Sexual Excitation in Young Women with Different Levels of Sexual Satisfaction in Relationships: A Laboratory Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Instruments and Materials
2.2. Procedure
2.3. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Henderson, A.W.; Lehavot, K.; Simoni, J. Ecological models of sexual satisfaction among lesbian/bisexual and heterosexual women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2009, 38, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Developing Sexual Health Programmes: A Framework for Action. 2010. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70501/WHO_RHR_HRP_10.22_eng.pdf;jsessionid=CBF4AE4544A30BE890077A9BB5856ABF?sequence=1 (accessed on 15 February 2024).
- World Association for Sexual Health. Declaration on Sexual Pleasure. 2021. Available online: https://www.worldsexualhealth.net/_files/ugd/793f03_e3db60b096364b97a6f5a7bcd10cd5ea.pdf?index=true (accessed on 15 February 2024).
- Fielder, R. Sexual functioning. In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine; Gellman, M.D., Turner, J.R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1774–1777. [Google Scholar]
- Flynn, K.E.; Lin, L.; Bruner, D.W.; Cyranowski, J.M.; Hahn, E.A.; Jeffery, D.D.; Reese, J.B.; Reeve, B.B.; Shelby, R.A.; Weinfurt, K.P. Sexual satisfaction and the importance of sexual health to quality of life throughout the life course of US adults. J. Sex. Med. 2016, 13, 1642–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M.; Santos-Iglesias, P.; Sierra, J.C. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2014, 14, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephenson, K.R.; Pickworth, C.; Jones, P.S. Gender differences in the association between sexual satisfaction and quality of life. Sex. Relatsh. Ther. 2024, 39, 301–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrance, K.; Byers, E.S. Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction. Pers. Relat. 1995, 2, 267–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byers, E.S. Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. J. Sex Res. 2005, 42, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M.; Santos-Iglesias, P. Sexual satisfaction in Spanish heterosexual couples: Testing the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2016, 42, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vowels, L.M.; Mark, K.P. Relationship and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal actor-partner independence model approach. Sex. Relatsh. Ther. 2020, 35, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, L.M.; Nathanson, C.A.; Kim, Y.J. Physical women, emotional men: Gender and sexual satisfaction in midlife. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2009, 38, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klusmann, D. Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2002, 31, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C. Does quality of marital sex decline with duration? Arch. Sex. Behav. 2003, 32, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C. A theory of sex difference in changes in marital sexual satisfaction. Evol. Behav. Sci. 2018, 12, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmiedeberg, C.; Schröder, J. Does sexual satisfaction change with relationship duration? Arch. Sex. Behav. 2016, 45, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parish, W.L.; Luo, Y.; Stolzenberg, R.; Laumann, E.O.; Farrer, G.; Pan, S. Sexual practices and sexual satisfaction: A population based study of Chinese urban adults. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2007, 36, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calvillo, C.; Sierra, J.C.; Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M.; Granados, R. Sexual rewards and costs in heterosexual and gay Hispanic adults. Healthcare 2024, 12, 170190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Józefacka, N.M.; Szpakiewicz, E.; Lech, D.; Guzowski, K.; Kania, G. What matters in a relationship—Age, sexual satisfaction, relationship length, and interpersonal closeness as predictors of relationship satisfaction in young adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laumann, E.O.; Paik, A.; Rosen, E.C. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999, 281, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peixoto, M.M.; Amarelo-Pires, I.; Pimentel Biscaia, M.S.; Machado, P.P.P. Sexual self-steem, sexual functioning and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Psychol. Sex. 2018, 9, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra, J.C.; Arcos-Romero, A.I.; Granados, R.; Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M.; Calvillo, C.; Moyano, N. Ratings of Sexual Arousal and Ratings of Genital Sensations: Psychometric properties in Spanish sample. Rev. Int. Androl. 2017, 15, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, E.; Bancroft, J. The dual control model of sexual response: A scoping review, 2009–2022. J. Sex Res. 2023, 60, 948–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bancroft, J.; Graham, C.A.; Janssen, E.; Sanders, S.A. The dual control model: Current status and future directions. J. Sex Res. 2009, 46, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bancroft, J.; Carnes, L.; Janssen, E.; Goodrich, D.; Long, J.S. Erectile and ejaculatory problems in gay and heterosexual men. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2005, 34, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bancroft, J.; Herbenick, D.; Barnes, T.; Hallam-Jones, R.; Wylie, K.; Janssen, E.; Members of BASRT. The relevance of the dual control model to male sexual dysfunction: The Kinsey Institute/BASRT collaborative project. Sex. Relatsh. Ther. 2005, 20, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bancroft, J.; Janssen, E. The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2000, 24, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moyano, N.; Sierra, J.C. Validation of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form (SIS/SES-SF). Ter. Psicol. 2014, 32, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanders, S.A.; Graham, C.A.; Milhausen, R.R. Predicting sexual problems in women: The relevance of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2008, 37, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra, J.C.; de la Rosa, M.D.; Granados, R.; Calvillo, C.; Arcos-Romero, A.I.; Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M.; Moyano, N. Validity evidence of the Spanish version of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form (SIS/SES-SF). Rev. Iberoam. Diagn. Eval.-Aval. Psicol. 2019, 50, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra, J.C.; Cervilla, O.; Álvarez-Muelas, A.; Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M. Validity of reliability evidence and norms for the Spanish version of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form. Psicothema 2024, 36, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, D.L.; Janssen, E.; Graham, C.A.; Vorst, H.; Wicherts, J. The Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form (SIS/SES-SF). In Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures; Fisher, T.D., Davis, C.M., Yarber, W.L., Davis, S.L., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 236–239. [Google Scholar]
- Janssen, E. Sexual arousal in men: A review and conceptual analysis. Horm. Behav. 2011, 59, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velten, J.; Scholten, S.; Graham, C.A.; Margraf, J. Psychometric properties of the sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women in a German sample. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2016, 45, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, E.; Everard, W.; Spiering, M.; Janssen, J. Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. J. Sex Res. 2000, 37, 8–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Traish, A.M.; Botchevar, E.; Kim, N.N. Biochemical factors modulating female genital sexual arousal physiology. J. Sex Res. 2010, 7, 2925–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chivers, M.L.; Seto, M.C.; Lalumière, M.L.; Laan, E.; Grimbos, T. Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2010, 39, 5–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosher, D.L. Multiple indicators of subjective sexual arousal. In Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures; Fisher, T.D., Davis, C.M., Yarber, W.L., Davis, S.L., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 59–61. [Google Scholar]
- Brotto, L.A.; Yule, M.A. Physiological and subjective sexual arousal in self-identified asexual women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2011, 40, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grauvogl, A.; de Jong, P.; Peters, M.; Evers, S.; van Overveld, M.; van Lankveld, J. Disgust and sexual arousal in young adult men and women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2015, 44, 1515–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clifton, J.; Seehuus, M.; Rellini, A.H. Testing cognitive predictors of individual differences in the sexual psychophysiological responses of sexually functional women. Psychophysiology 2015, 52, 957–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcos-Romero, A.I.; Sierra, J.C. Factors associated with subjective orgasm experience in heterosexual relationships. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2020, 46, 314–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lykins, A.; Janssen, E.; Newhouse, S.; Heiman, J.R.; Rafaeli, E. The effects of similarity in sexual excitation, inhibition, and mood on sexual arousal problems and sexual satisfaction in newlywed couples. J. Sex. Med. 2012, 9, 1360–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawless, N.J.; Karantzas, G.C.; Mullins, E.R.; McCabe, M.P. Does it matter who you feel sexually aroused by? Associations between sexual arousal, relationship quality, and sexual satisfaction. Sex. Med. 2022, 10, 100523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busby, D.M.; Leonhardt, N.D.; Hanna-Walker, V.; Leavitt, C.E. Putting the dyad into the sexual response discussion: A latent class analysis using ratings of self and partner. J. Sex Res. 2022, 59, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawłowska, A.; Janssen, E.; Dewitte, M. The way you make me feel: An ecological momentary assessment study on couple similarity in sexual arousal and its sexual, relational, and affective correlates. J. Sex. Med. 2023, 20, 1115–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lawrance, K.; Byers, E.S.; Cohen, J.N. Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire. In Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures, 4th ed.; Milhausen, R.R., Sakaluk, J.K., Fisher, T.D., Davis, C.M., Yarber, W.L., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 497–503. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M.; Santos-Iglesias, P.; Byers, E.S.; Sierra, J.C. Validation of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. J. Sex Res. 2015, 52, 1028–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sierra, J.C.; Álvarez-Muelas, A.; Arcos-Romero, A.I.; Calvillo, C.; Torres-Obregón, R.; Granados, R. Connection between subjective sexual arousal and genital response: Differences between men and women. Rev. Int. Androl. 2019, 17, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2020. Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 14 February 2022).
- RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R (Computer Software); RStudio PBC: Boston, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Stekhoven, D.J.; Bühlmann, P. MissForest—Non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 2011, 28, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revelle, W. Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research; Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 2019; Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/index.html (accessed on 20 March 2024).
- Boyer, S.C.; Pukall, C.F.; Holden, R.R. The relationship between female sexual arousal and response bias in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia. J. Sex Res. 2012, 49, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granados, R.; Carvalho, J.; Sierra, J.C. Preliminary evidence on how the dual control model predicts female sexual response to bogus negative feedback. Psychol. Rep. 2021, 124, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, C.A.; Sanders, S.A.; Milhausen, R.R.; McBride, K.R. Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2004, 33, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vowels, L.M.; Vowels, M.J.; Mark, K.P. Identifying the strongest self-report predictors of sexual satisfaction using machine learning. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 2022, 39, 1191–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, D.L.; Janssen, E.; Graham, C.A.; Vorst, H.; Wicherts, J. Women´s scores on the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES): Gender similarities and differences. J. Sex Res. 2008, 45, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinta Gomes, A.L.; Janssen, E.; Santos-Iglesias, P.; Pinto-Gouveia, J.; Fonseca, L.M.; Nobre, P.J. Validation of the Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES) in Portugal: Assessing gender differences and predictors of sexual functioning. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2018, 47, 1721–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dèttore, D.; Pucciarelli, M.; Santarnecchi, E. Anxiety and female sexual functioning: An empirical study. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2013, 39, 216–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atlantis, E.; Sullivan, T. Bidirectional association between depression and sexual dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sex. Med. 2012, 9, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nappi, R.E.; Cucinella, L.; Martella, S.; Rossi, M.; Tiranini, L.; Martini, E. Female sexual dysfunction (FSD): Prevalence and impact on quality of life (QoL). Maturitas 2016, 94, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nolet, K.; Guay, J.P.; Bergeron, S. Validation of the French-Canadian version of the Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form (SIS/SES-SF): Associations with sexual functioning, sociosexual orientation, and sexual compulsivity. Sex. Med. 2021, 9, 100374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wincze, J.J.; Weiberg, R.B. Sexual Dysfunction: A Guide for Assessment and Treatment, 3rd ed.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Peterson, Z.D.; Muehlenhard, C.L. What is sex and why does it matter? A motivational approach to exploring individuals’ definitions of sex. J. Sex Res. 2007, 44, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muehlenhard, C.L.; Shippee, S.K. Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. J. Sex Res. 2010, 47, 552–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salisbury, C.M.; Fisher, W.A. “Did you come?” A qualitative exploration of gender differences in beliefs, experiences, and concerns regarding female orgasm occurrence during heterosexual sexual interactions. J. Sex Res. 2014, 51, 616–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClelland, S.I. Who is the “self” in self reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 2011, 8, 304–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascoal, P.M.; Narciso, I.D.S.B.; Pereira, N.M. What is sexual satisfaction? Thematic analysis of lay people’s definitions. J. Sex Res. 2014, 51, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coker, A.L. Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abus. 2007, 8, 149–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fallah, M.Y.; Talemi, A.N.; Bagheri, M.; Allameh, Y.; Mazloumirad, M.; Zandnia, F.; Gheitarani, B.; Ghahari, S. Attachment styles, marital conflicts, coping strategies, and sexual satisfaction in spouse abused and non-abused women. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orchowski, L.M.; Yusufov, M.; Oesterle, D.; Bogen, K.W.; Zlotnick, C. Intimate partner violence and coerced unprotected sex among young women attending community college. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2020, 49, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra, J.C.; Álvarez-Muelas, A.; Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M. Sexual function and relationship satisfaction among women who have experienced intimate partner violence. Curr. Sex. Health Rep. 2023, 15, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, S.L. Sexual victimization by current partner is negatively associated with women’s sexual satisfaction. Women Health 2023, 63, 797–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bronfenbrenner, U. Ecological models of human development. In The International Encyclopedia of Education; Husén, T., Postlethwaite, T.N., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 1994; pp. 1643–1647. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M.; Salinas, J.M.; Sierra, J.C. Use of an ecological model to study sexual satisfaction in a heterosexual spanish sample. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2016, 45, 1973–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calvillo, C.; Sánchez-Fuentes, M.M.; Sierra, J.C. An explanatory model of sexual satisfaction in adults with a same-sex partner: An analysis based on gender differences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez-Muelas, A.; Gómez-Berrocal, C.; Sierra, J.C. Study of Sexual Satisfaction in Different Typologies of Adherence to the Sexual Double Standard. Front. Psychol. 2021, 11, 609571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinxten, W.; Lievens, J. Gender differences in the development of sexual excitation and inhibition through the life course: Preliminary finding from a representative study in flanders. J. Sex Res. 2016, 53, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granados, R.; Moyano, N.; Sierra, J.C. Behavioral intention to have risky sex in young men and women: The rol of sexual excitation and assertiveness. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
M | SD | Range Study | Range Scales | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sexual satisfaction | 30.96 | 4.46 | 15–35 | 5–35 |
Relationship satisfaction | 31.16 | 4.42 | 17–35 | 5–35 |
SES | 15.60 | 2.82 | 11–23 | 6–24 |
SIS1 | 8.20 | 1.84 | 4–12 | 4–16 |
SIS2 | 12.24 | 2.31 | 6–16 | 4–16 |
Genital response | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0–0.21 | - |
RSA | 19.84 | 4.40 | 12–28 | 5–35 |
RGS | 3.80 | 1.41 | 1–7 | 1–11 |
Relationship Satisfaction | SES | SIS1 | SIS2 | Genital Response | RSA | RSG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sexual satisfaction | 0.65 ** | 0.19 | −0.35 * | −0.31 * | −0.18 | 0.03 | 0.15 |
Relationship satisfaction | 0.07 | −0.13 | −0.12 | −0.32 * | −0.05 | −0.01 | |
SES | −0.20 | −0.43 ** | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.13 | ||
SIS1 | 0.54 ** | 0.09 | 0.08 | −0.11 | |||
SIS2 | −0.03 | 0.10 | 0.16 | ||||
Genital response | 0.03 | −0.08 | |||||
RSA | 0.61 ** |
Low Scores in Sexual Satisfaction Group | Average Scores in Sexual Satisfaction Group | High Scores in Sexual Satisfaction Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n = 12 | n = 18 | n = 15 | ||||
M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | F | p | ηp2 | |
SES | 14.92 (2.47) | 15.72 (3.30) | 16 (2.54) | 0.50 | 0.606 | |
SIS1 | 9.41 (1.38) a | 8.06 (2.04) | 7.4 (1.45) a | 4.79 | 0.013 | 0.19 |
SIS2 | 13.67 (1.61) a | 11.94 (2.62) | 11.47 (1.96) a | 3.68 | 0.034 | 0.15 |
Genital response | 0.07 (0.03) | 0.06 (0.06) | 0.05 (0.05) | 0.71 | 0.496 | |
RSA | 21.33 (4.36) | 19.11 (4.34) | 19.53 (4.52) | 0.97 | 0.386 | |
RGS | 3.58 (1.16) | 4 (1.57) | 3.73 (1.44) | 0.33 | 0.721 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sánchez-Fuentes, M.d.M.; Álvarez-Muelas, A.; Cervilla, O.; Granados, R.; Sierra, J.C. Sexual Excitation in Young Women with Different Levels of Sexual Satisfaction in Relationships: A Laboratory Study. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090769
Sánchez-Fuentes MdM, Álvarez-Muelas A, Cervilla O, Granados R, Sierra JC. Sexual Excitation in Young Women with Different Levels of Sexual Satisfaction in Relationships: A Laboratory Study. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(9):769. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090769
Chicago/Turabian StyleSánchez-Fuentes, María del Mar, Ana Álvarez-Muelas, Oscar Cervilla, Reina Granados, and Juan Carlos Sierra. 2024. "Sexual Excitation in Young Women with Different Levels of Sexual Satisfaction in Relationships: A Laboratory Study" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 9: 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090769