Future Self-Continuity and Grit in College Students: The Role of Future Time Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Future Self-Continuity and Grit
2.2. The Mediating Role of Future Time Perspective
2.3. The Present Study
3. Methods
3.1. Participants and Procedures
3.2. Measures
3.2.1. Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ)
3.2.2. Future Time Perspective Scale (FTPS)
3.2.3. Grit Scale
3.3. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Reliability and Validity
4.2. FSC and FTP Across Grit Groups
4.3. Pearson Correlation Analysis
4.4. FSC and Grit: Direct Effect and Mediation Analysis
4.5. The Mediating Role of FTP in Shaping Grit
5. Discussion
5.1. Summary of the Findings
5.2. Theoretical Significance and Practical Implications
5.2.1. Theoretical Significance
5.2.2. Practical Implications
5.3. Limitations and Future Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Adelman, R. M., Herrmann, S. D., Bodford, J. E., & Frazier, R. H. (2017). Feeling closer to the future self and doing better: Temporal psychological mechanisms underlying academic performance. Journal of Personality, 85(3), 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bartels, D. M., & Urminsky, O. (2011). On intertemporal selfishness: How the perceived instability of identity underlies impatient consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 182–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Oettingen, G. (2016). Pragmatic prospection: How and why people think about the future. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hershfield, H. E. (2011). Future self-continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hershfield, H. E., Garton, M. T., Ballard, K., & Berman, J. (2009a). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(4), 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hershfield, H. E., Wimmer, G. E., & Knutson, B. (2009b). Saving for the future self: Neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(1), 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, H., & Lv, H. (2017). The relationship between adolescents’ future time perspective and academic performance: The mediating role of grit. Psychological Development and Education, 33(3), 321–327. [Google Scholar]
- Li, T., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2022). The intergenerational transmission of grit: The mediating role of parenting style. Psychological Development and Education, 38(2), 207–215. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X., Guo, X., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Autonomous support environment and middle school students’ grit: A moderated mediation model. Educational Research and Experiment, 2023(2), 102–111. [Google Scholar]
- Ling, Y., Chen, Y., You, J., & Wang, F. (2021). The impact of social support on adolescent internet addiction: The chain mediating role of grit and domain-specific impulsivity. Chinese Clinical Psychology Journal, 29(3), 567–571. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2018). Future self-continuity and its impact on individual psychology and behavior. Advances in Psychology, 26(12), 2161–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, X., Lv, H., & Hua, S. (2014). Delay of gratification: Self-regulation based on future time perspective. Psychological Science, 37(1), 78–82. [Google Scholar]
- Rutchick, A. M., Slepian, M. L., Reyes, M. O., & Kuo, M. C. (2018). Future self-continuity is associated with improved health and increased exercise behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(1), 72–80. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychologist, 16(2), 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokol, Y., & Serper, M. (2020). Development and validation of a future self-continuity questionnaire: A preliminary report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(5), 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Q. (2004). Theoretical and empirical research on college students’ future time perspective [Ph.D. dissertation, Southwest Normal University]. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L., Chen, Z., & He, Y. (2020). The impact of transmission motivation on financial risk-taking behavior: The mediating role of future self-continuity. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(8), 1004–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X., Fan, C., Zhou, Z., & Li, J. (2021). The relationship between mindfulness and smartphone addiction tendency: The role of boredom tendency and future time perspective. Psychological Development and Education, 37(3), 419–428. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y., & Zeng, X. (2022). The impact of future self-continuity on college students’ learning engagement: The mediating role of expected future outcomes. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 30(4), 601–607. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, F., Zhang, S., Zang, X., & Li, Y. (2020). The relationship between family economic status and future self-continuity: The mediating role of time management tendency. Psychological Research, 13(5), 467–473. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J., Zhou, G., Deng, Z., & Li, X. (2023). The impact of growth mindset on college students’ sense of educational achievement: The chain mediating role of grit and learning engagement. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 31(6), 953–960. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y., Zhai, X., Zhang, G., & Li, W. (2022). The relationship between growth mindset and grit: The chain mediating role of future time perspective and achievement motivation. Psychological Development and Education, 38(2), 216–222. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, H., & Long, L. (2004). Statistical testing and control methods for common method bias. Advances in Psychology, 6, 942–950. [Google Scholar]
- Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Low Group (n = 128) | High Group (n = 128) | t | Cohen’s d | Degrees of Freedom |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M ± SD | M ± SD | ||||
1 Positivity | 4.10 ± 1.08 | 4.10 ± 1.08 | −2.374 ** | 0.30 | 251 |
2 Vividness | 3.67 ± 1.31 | 4.35 ± 1.29 | −4.167 *** | 0.53 | 251 |
3 Similarity | 4.57 ± 1.35 | 5.35 ± 1.32 | −4.652 *** | 0.58 | 251 |
4 Future Self-Continuity | 4.11 ± 0.90 | 4.69 ± 0.98 | −4.905 *** | 0.63 | 251 |
5 Behavioral Commitment | 3.34 ± 0.61 | 4.01 ± 0.51 | −9.441 *** | 1.19 | 251 |
6 Future Efficacy | 3.52 ± 0.79 | 4.14 ± 0.60 | −7.053 *** | 0.92 | 251 |
7 Far-Reach Goal Orientation | 3.42 ± 0.68 | 3.80 ± 0.64 | −4.662 *** | 0.60 | 251 |
8 Future Purpose Consciousness | 2.69 ± 0.65 | 3.54 ± 0.76 | −9.59 *** | 1.37 | 251 |
9 Future Image | 3.61 ± 0.60 | 3.92 ± 0.54 | −4.274 *** | 0.54 | 251 |
10 Future Time Perspective | 3.31 ± 0.48 | 3.86 ± 0.46 | −9.519 *** | 1.22 | 251 |
Variables | M (SD) | FSC1 | FSC2 | FSC3 | FSC | FTP1 | PTP2 | FTP3 | FTP4 | FTP5 | FTP | Grit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSC1 | 4.28 (1.16) | 1 | ||||||||||
FSC2 | 4.09 (1.30) | 0.444 ** | 1 | |||||||||
FSC3 | 4.91 (1.32) | 0.233 ** | 0.452 ** | 1 | ||||||||
FSC | 4.41 (0.96) | 0.765 ** | 0.813 ** | 0.712 ** | 1 | |||||||
FTP1 | 3.65 (0.61) | 0.201 ** | 0.315 ** | 0.344 ** | 0.369 ** | 1 | ||||||
FTP2 | 3.81 (0.72) | 0.212 ** | 0.339 ** | 0.493 ** | 0.446 ** | 0.671 ** | 1 | |||||
FTP3 | 3.62 (0.64) | 0.157 ** | 0.335 ** | 0.309 ** | 0.342 ** | 0.663 ** | 0.606 ** | 1 | ||||
FTP4 | 3.00 (0.81) | 0.01 ** | 0.136 ** | 0.283 ** | 0.178 ** | 0.318 ** | 0.337 ** | 0.200 ** | 1 | |||
FTP5 | 3.72 (0.57) | 0.067 ** | 0.147 ** | 0.272 ** | 0.205 ** | 0.439 ** | 0.520 ** | 0.441 ** | 0.359 ** | 1 | ||
FTP | 3.55 (0.49) | 0.165 ** | 0.338 ** | 0.448 ** | 0.404 ** | 0.812 ** | 0.810 ** | 0.786 ** | 0.626 ** | 0.713 ** | 1 | |
Grit | 3.13(0.45) | 0.109 * | 0.203 ** | 0.264 ** | 0.245 ** | 0.528 ** | 0.417 ** | 0.287 ** | 0.472 ** | 0.262 ** | 0.528 ** | 1 |
Regression Equation | Overall Fit Index | Coefficient Significance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dependent Variables | Predictor | R | R2 | F | β | t |
1 Grit | 0.30 | 0.09 | 9.56 *** | |||
Gender | −0.08 | −1.71 | ||||
Age | 0.15 | 2.54 ** | ||||
Academic Year | −0.00 | −0.08 | ||||
FSC | 0.23 | 4.70 *** | ||||
2 FTP | 0.42 | 0.18 | 20.76 *** | |||
Gender | 0.07 | 1.41 | ||||
Age | 0.11 | 1.90 | ||||
Academic Year | −0.01 | −0.19 | ||||
FSC | 0.40 | 8.59 *** | ||||
3 Grit | 0.55 | 0.30 | 33.51 *** | |||
Gender | −0.12 | −2.73 ** | ||||
Age | 0.10 | 1.85 | ||||
Academic Year | 0.00 | 0.02 | ||||
FTP | 0.51 | 10.85 *** | ||||
FSC | 0.02 | 0.52 |
Effect Type | Path | Effect Value | Bootstrapped Standard Error | 95% Confidence Interval |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Effect | 0.23 | 0.05 | [0.13, 0.32] | |
Direct Effect | FSC → Grit | 0.02 | 0.05 | [−0.07, 0.12] |
Indirect Effect | FSC → FTP → Grit | 0.21 | 0.03 | [0.14, 0.27] |
Regression Equation | Overall Fit Index | Coefficient Significance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dependent Variable | Predictor | R | R2 | F | β | t |
1 Grit | 0.30 | 0.09 | 9.56 *** | |||
FSC | 0.23 | 4.66 *** | ||||
2 Behavioral Commitment | 0.39 | 0.16 | 17.77 *** | |||
FSC | 0.36 | 7.63 *** | ||||
3 Future Efficacy | 0.46 | 0.21 | 26.09 *** | |||
FSC | 0.45 | 9.86 *** | ||||
4 Far-Reach Goal Orientation | 0.35 | 0.12 | 13.25 *** | |||
FSC | 0.34 | 7.13 *** | ||||
5 Future Purpose Consciousness | 0.24 | 0.06 | 6.02 *** | |||
FSC | 0.17 | 3.37 ** | ||||
6 Future Image | 0.22 | 0.05 | 4.73 *** | |||
FSC | 0.20 | 4.07 *** | ||||
7 Grit | 0.64 | 0.41 | 29.09 *** | |||
Behavioral Commitment | 0.44 | 7.31 *** | ||||
Future Efficacy | 0.11 | 1.75 | ||||
Far-Reach Goal Orientation | −0.12 | −2.11 * | ||||
Future Purpose Consciousness | 0.33 | 7.53 *** | ||||
Future Image | −0.57 | −1.17 | ||||
FSC | 0.02 | 0.38 |
Effect | Path | Standardized Effect Size | Bootstrapped Standard Error | 95% Confidence Interval | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||||
Total Effect | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.32 | ||
Direct Effect | FSC→Grit | 0.02 | 0.05 | −0.07 | 0.11 | |
Indirect Effect | FSC→Behavioral Commitment→Grit | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.23 | |
FSC→Future Efficacy→Grit | 0.05 | 0.04 | −0.03 | 0.12 | ||
FSC→Far-Reach Goal Orientation→Grit | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.09 | 0.02 | ||
FSC→Future Purpose Consciousness→Grit | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.10 | ||
FSC→Future Image→Grit | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.04 | 0.01 | ||
Total Indirect Effect | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.29 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wei, D.; Ouyang, Y.; Zeng, X. Future Self-Continuity and Grit in College Students: The Role of Future Time Perspective. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020144
Wei D, Ouyang Y, Zeng X. Future Self-Continuity and Grit in College Students: The Role of Future Time Perspective. Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 15(2):144. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020144
Chicago/Turabian StyleWei, Dandan, Yuting Ouyang, and Xueyun Zeng. 2025. "Future Self-Continuity and Grit in College Students: The Role of Future Time Perspective" Behavioral Sciences 15, no. 2: 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020144
APA StyleWei, D., Ouyang, Y., & Zeng, X. (2025). Future Self-Continuity and Grit in College Students: The Role of Future Time Perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020144