Next Article in Journal
Teaching Atmospheric Hazards in the Climate Change Context—Environmental Didactic Proposals in the Mediterranean Region for Secondary Schools
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring and Management of Inland Waters: Insights from the Most Inhabited Italian Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
Empirical Research of Public Acceptance on Environmental Tax: A Systematic Literature Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Environments
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/environments9020028
environments-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bibliographic Coupling Links: Alternative Approaches to Carrying Out Systematic Reviews about Renewable and Sustainable Energy

by
Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho
Agricultural School (ESAV) and CERNAS-IPV Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu (IPV), 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal
Environments 2022, 9(2), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9020028
Submission received: 22 December 2021 / Revised: 8 February 2022 / Accepted: 9 February 2022 / Published: 12 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability-Life Cycle Assessment-Energy and Environmental Technology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

New technologies, specifically the internet, have over the last two decades increased the number of publications in the most diverse fields of science. Subjects related to renewable and sustainable energy are no exception. These frameworks have allowed the main insights produced by the scientific community through literature surveys to be highlighted. Nonetheless, considering the vast quantity of studies, systematic approaches have been proposed by the researchers to better organize and perform the literature review. Considering the subjectivity of some of these methodologies, the main objectives of this research are to conduct a systematic review about renewable and sustainable energy through more objective techniques, based on bibliometric analysis, to provide an alternative or to complement those already available within the literature. For this purpose, a “Biblio4Review” approach was proposed in order to perform systematic reviews about renewable and sustainable energy that may spread into other scientific fields. This methodology is based on bibliographic coupling links from the bibliometric analysis to identify the most relevant studies for the literature review. The results obtained highlight that with this approach it was possible to identify the studies with greater centrality in terms of references shared. In this way, they are among the most relevant documents for these topics. Specifically for the topic considered (renewable and sustainable energy) the main insights were referred to. In any case, the findings obtained show that there is a field for more interdisciplinary approaches.

1. Introduction

A preliminary survey of the literature shows that research on renewable and sustainable topics is often focused on energy dimensions, revealing that there is a field for interdisciplinary approaches. Indeed, interdisciplinary contributions allow making this topic broader where the environmental, social, and economic dimensions may be encompassed to give evidence for more sustainable development.
In addition, a search on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) [1] about the topics “renewable and sustainable energy” and “systematic review” shows a limited number of studies conducted on these subjects. The studies published on WoS focused on photovoltaic approaches [2], quality control [3], renewable energy and economic dynamics [4], renewable and sustainable energy in the Asian context [5], and heat waves [6].
This search on WoS also reveals that there is no document in which the topic “bibliometric” is added. This assessment highlights an interesting indication that supports the relevance of addressing the systematic reviews issue, based on bibliometric approaches on the topic of renewable and sustainable energy.
The consideration of the bibliometric analysis to conduct systematic reviews as a complement or alternative to the PRISMA [7] approach, for example, is not new. It was considered for subjects related to food marketing [8], agri-food frameworks [9], circular economy [10], smart agriculture [11], and business contexts [12].
The novelty of the study provided is to propose a methodology based specifically on bibliographic coupling and centrality metrics to conduct systematic reviews concerning renewable and sustainable energy, which may be broadened into other fields.
Taking into account these findings, this research aims to highlight the main gaps in the literature about renewable and sustainable energy and to propose suggestions for more interdisciplinary approaches. It is intended to develop a proposal to conduct systematic reviews and then implement them based on bibliometric analysis, through bibliographic coupling links and centrality metrics. It is not easy to find a definition for systematic review; nonetheless, it may be considered as a review that considers the following [13]: research question, search sources, inclusion criteria, selection approaches, quality/risks analyses, transparency, and reproducibility. This definition was proposed by a study focused on the health care literature; however, the findings may be applied in other areas of science.

2. Literature Review

Bibliographic coupling links are similarity approaches used in the frameworks of science mapping [14], considered in the bibliometric analysis, and occur when different documents share the same references [15]. For bibliographic coupling, the relatedness of documents is relative to the number of references they share [16]. In other words, bibliographic coupling occurs when two documents have a third word as a reference [17].
Bibliographic coupling has been considered, in the literature, for analysis in several studies relating to the different fields of science, such as the following (sometimes combined with other approaches [18]): assessment of the risk culture in commercial enterprises [19]; interdisciplinary in health research [20]; industry 4.0 [21]; electrical and electronic waste [22]; social responsibility [23]; corporate social responsibility [24]; Journal of Intellectual Capital [25]; co-innovation [26]; business literature [27]; public relations theory [28]; distance learning [29]; search results [30]; big data and business strategy [31]; historiography dimensions [32]; Brazilian publications [33]; Iberoamerican scientific production [34]; Journal of Marketing Education [35]; Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice [36]; Journal of Consumer Marketing [37]; tourism sector [38]; sustainable operation [39]; classical music [40]; Chinese patent information [41]; Chinese-Latin American relations [42]; industry [43]; food sector [44]; Asian literature [45]; firm level analysis [46]; innovation management [47]; social capital [48]; and entrepreneurship [49].
Various studies contributed to the knowledge concerning the different dimensions associated with bibliographic coupling. Some support its introduction and dissemination in the literature [50]. Others consolidate its relevance [51] and pertinence for bibliometric analysis [52] by the scientific community and others to bring about improvements [53], insights [54], and overviews [55]. This approach has been frequently considered in the literature and used from diverse perspectives [56], including coupling assessment among social media network users [57]. It allows for the identification of networks and clusters between documents that share references [58]. Bibliographic coupling also considers documents as items [59], and this is an advantage compared to other links from the bibliometric analysis. In addition, this is a quantitative methodology having more objectivity in the outputs, which is an added asset relative to qualitative approaches [60]. Another advantage is that younger publications may cite older documents, giving an updated perspective on the topics [61] and changing the focus for current tendencies [62]. Citations shared by studies may prove to be an interesting indicator about their relationships [63] and interlinkages with the same topic [64]. In this way, bibliographic coupling is often considered as being more adjusted in identifying the most relevant research compared to other techniques [65].
Bibliometric analysis is a determinant tool in supporting researchers to overview the context of documents published about specific topics [66], namely when dealing with a large volume of information [67], with specific issues [68] or publications [69]. This analysis also allows for the identification of transformations in different scientific topics [70] as well as current fields [71], emerging topics [72], trends [73], gaps in the literature [74], most relevant topics [75], themes [76], and similarities among items beyond documents [77]. The other items considered are, for example, the authors [78]. Nonetheless, it is not exempt from limitations and criticism [79], namely due to the different ways used by databases in writing the same information (references, for example) [80] and other sources of bias [81] and limitations [82], such as the potential great number of zeros in the similarity matrix [83].

3. Materials and Methods

To achieve the objectives proposed, 486 and 743 documents were obtained from the scientific databases WoS [1] and Scopus [84] during a search performed on 19 July 2021 for the topic “renewable and sustainable energy”. These documents were assessed through centrality metrics (harmonic closeness centrality), for bibliographic coupling links, with the Gephi software [85,86] to identify the most relevant document for the topic. The files for the Gephi software were prepared through the VOSviewer software [16,87]. The harmonic closeness centrality metric is the sum of the inverted distances between nodes, [88] in a not necessarily connected graph [89].
The bibliometric analysis was conducted separately for the two databases (WoS and Scopus). After identifying the most relevant studies for each database, the respective documents were added. Then the duplicate documents were removed, and a survey of the remaining studies was conducted to identify the most important insights.
The approach proposed may fill in the gaps the literature about systematic reviews in fields related to renewable and sustainable energy. It may include proposals to design alternative and more quantitative methodologies.

4. Data Analysis

Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 show the most productive and networked authors, countries, organizations, and sources, for the topic “renewable and sustainable energy”. These top-20 items were obtained through the VOSviewer software [87], considering bibliographic data and bibliographic coupling links. These tables show the number of documents for each item (authors, countries, organizations, and sources) and for each database. The weight attributed to “Documents” corresponds to the number of documents published by each item [16].
The most productive and networked author considering the information obtained from the Scopus database is Hameiri, Z., with 20 documents. In second place is Hosseini, S.E. who is also the most productive author for the WoS database (Table 1). Foley, A. and Duic, N. also appear among the authors having more documents in Scopus and WoS.
Table 2 reveals that the most productive countries for the two databases are China, the United States, India, Malaysia, and the United Kingdom/England. For the European Union member-states, Italy, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, and France are the countries with more publications for the topic.
These findings highlight the importance given by countries, such as China and the United States, to the fields related to renewable and sustainable energy. This is a concern for several countries, including Saudi Arabia and Iran.
The results provided in Table 3 are consistent with the findings described for Table 1 and Table 2 relative to the top authors and countries of affiliation. In fact, the most productive organizations are from Australia, China, the United Kingdom, Croatia, and Malaysia. The United States is in second place as an affiliated country, but does not appear among the most productive organizations, showing that the network is weaker for these organizations.
The most productive sources are the following (Table 4): Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews; Energies; Renewable Energy; and Energy. In addition, a relevant part of the top-20 sources are publications associated with the topics related to energy, with the exception for journals, such as Journal of Cleaner Production and Sustainability.

5. Identifying the Most Relevant Documents for Systematic Review

The information displayed in Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7 was obtained through the Gephi software [85,86], considering files prepared with the VOSviewer software [16,87] for bibliographic data and bibliographic coupling links. The advantages of the bibliographic coupling links to identify the most relevant documents for systematic review were highlighted in the literature review section. Some of these advantages are relative to the specificities of the nodes that are documents and, in this way, do not change over time [59]. Another advantage is that more recent publications may refer back to older documents and give an updated view of the topics analyzed [61].
In addition, the harmonic closeness centrality metric was considered as an indicator to order the documents. This metric gives evidence concerning the distance of each node/label to the others [85,86]. Considering that bibliographic data were considered for bibliographic coupling links, shorter distances among documents means that they share more references. From this perspective, the harmonic closeness centrality is an appropriate indicator for the objectives proposed in this research.
With the information presented in Table 5 and Table 6, (after removing the duplicates) the results shown in Table 7 were obtained. These documents will be considered for systematic review. The approach that was considered since the beginning of this study, and referred to as “Biblio4Review”, to achieve the documents shown in Table 7, is summarized in Figure 1.

6. Systematic Review

The systematic review conducted with the documents shown in Table 7 are summarized in Table 8. In general, these documents are focused on specific issues or specific countries.
The specific countries addressed by these studies were Australia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Some of them are petroleum export countries. The particular issues focused on were those related to energy sources (biomass, late transition metals, and solar power), processes and technologies (hydronic asphalt pavement, polygeneration, and bioconversion), methodologies (extreme learning machines, deep learning models, and computational optimization approaches), hydrogen, biofuel, and solar energy production.
In terms of biomass sources, this systematic review highlighted the importance of microalgae to produce biodiesel [90], palm oil solid waste [91], Delonix Regia [92], cereal crop residues [93], and Cannabis sativa [94]. Microalgae biomass may become an important alternative, because it is more efficient in terms of carbon sequestration and has a higher level of carbohydrates. The palm oil waste can support 40% of the energy demand in Malaysia through thermochemical processes. Delonix Regia has a higher H/C ratio relative to pinewood sawdust and coal.
With regard to the processes and technologies, it is worth noting that the hydronic asphalt pavement approach [95] may reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 8–100%. Bioconversion with insect and ruminant host symbionts for recycling of lignocellulosic carbon [96]. Additionally, the pre-treatment to use cereal crop residues [93] and for pyrolysis processes [97] have also been concerns for researchers.
Extreme learning machines, deep learning models [98], and computational optimization approaches [99] are methodologies emphasized by the literature. The production of hydrogen has motivated the scientific community [100]. The supercritical water gasification of biomass seems to be the more profitable thermochemical system in producing hydrogen.
Finally, the concerns of petroleum export countries, such as Saudi Arabia [101] and Indonesia [102], for more environmentally friendly energy production and use are good news in achieving global goals for more renewable and sustainable sources of energy.
Figure 2 summarizes the main topics and sub-topics related to renewable and sustainable energy dimensions. It highlights the main potentialities for interdisciplinary approaches.
Table 8. Main findings from systematic review.
Table 8. Main findings from systematic review.
DocumentObjectives/MethodologiesMain Insights
[90]Review about microalgae to produce biodiesel and butanolAlgae as a source of biofuels have several advantages, such as they grow faster; are more efficient at carbon sequestration; and are high in oil and carbohydrates.
[98]Predict the highest wave energy period in Australia with extreme learning machines and deep learning modelsIn terms of forecasting, extreme learning machines produce better results than deep learning models.
[101]Review the context about renewable and sustainable energy technologies in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, considering Saudi Vision 2030Fossil fuel is presently used to produce about 80% of the energy needs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This country prepared a plan to increase renewable and sustainable energy technologies for power generation to achieve 50% by 2050.
[103]Design and simulation of an electrical submersible pump system in geothermal conditions of TurkeyThe electrical submersible pump design has an impact on the production rate.
[99]Review about computational optimization methods in the fields of the renewable and sustainable energyThe main optimization approaches found in the literature were: mixed-integer and interval linear-programming; Lagrangian relaxation; quadratic programming; Nelder–Mead Simplex search; heuristic optimization approaches; and Pareto-optimization methods.
[104]Review the late transition metal nanocomplexes as a source in renewable energyThe types of catalytic reactions and types of energy storage were highlighted.
[105]Review about solar fuels and solar energy generationSolar fuels may be an interesting alternative to produce sustainable energy and mitigate the dioxide carbon impacts.
[95]Review about hydronic asphalt pavement approachesPavement solar collector approaches may reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 8–100%.
[106]Review about polygenerationPolygeneration is a sustainable approach that may be improved with the design of prototypes with intelligent control and monitoring structures.
[102]Review about the sustainable energy context in IndonesiaThe utilization of renewable energy in power generation in Indonesia is only around 3%.
[107]Review about renewable and sustainable energy in MalaysiaMalaysia has conditions to increase power generation through biomass and biogas utilization, solar power generation, and
Hydropower.
[100]Overview about hydrogen productionSupercritical water gasification of biomass is the more economical and thermochemical system to produce hydrogen.
[91]Review about hydrogen production from oil palm solid waste in MalaysiaForty percent of the energy needs of Malaysia may be supplied by a thermochemical process of palm solid residues.
[108]Review about utilization of biofuels in IndiaMore research about these fields and adjusted strategies to increase the availability of biofuel feedstock were suggested, as were a revision of the related fiscal system and promotion of public-private partnerships.
[92]Delonix Regia as a source of biomassDelonix Regia has an H/C ratio of 1.56 which is higher than pinewood sawdust (1.43) and of coal (1–1.4).
[93]Review about Indian cereal crop residues to produce biogasChemical pretreatment in cereal crop residues use for bioenergy generation by unmasking lignin.
[109]Review about hollow heterostructures derived from metal-organic-framework for electrocatalysisThe use of hollow heterostructures as electrode materials for oxygen- and hydrogen-involved energy conversion strategies and rechargeable batteries were emphasized.
[110]Review about biofuel productionThe principal barriers of biofuel markets are related to total capital cost, feedstock cost, process yield, and fossil oil price.
[111]Synthesis of WO3–x/MoO3–x heterojunctionCO performance is 40.2 μmol·g−1·h−1, which is 9.5 times greater than that of the pristine MoO3−x nanosheet.
[112]Review about biofuel generation from triglyceridesBiomass availability and composition, conversion technologies, and characteristics of biofuel were highlighted.
[113]Review about crop residues and weedy biomass for bio-ethanol generationPretreatment technologies, enzyme cocktails for saccharification, and fermentation strategies were discussed.
[114]Discussion about microalgal biomass for biofuel generationThermochemical conversion of microalgal biomass has relevant advantages, namely due to its simplicity, shorter conversion time, and higher productivity.
[96]Review about insect
and ruminant host symbionts for recycling
of lignocellulosic carbon		The xylophagous insects and herbivores animals
are interesting sources for lignocellulosic biomass bioconversion.
[94]Review about bioenergy generation from Cannabis sativa in PakistanThis biomass feedstock will allow savings of U.S. $200–400 million and will supply 4000 MW of energy.
[115]Review about tendencies in Afghanistan for more renewable and sustainable energies sourcesThe power sector is one of the main constraints for development in Afghanistan where renewable and sustainable sources of energy may bring relevant opportunities.
[116]Review about solar power technologiesThe cost for concentrated solar power with storage is about 9.0 ¢/kWh and is expected to drop at ~5.0 ¢/kWh by 2030. Nonetheless, this technology needs further development and cost reductions.
[117]Review about renewable energy investmentsThe methods used for energy planning are often from multicriteria decision analysis. LCA and CBA are more used for energy policy and management and environmental impact analysis.
[118]Summary about interfacial chemical particularity of the Platinum-based catalysts for controlling alkaline hydrogen evolution reactionThe alkaline electrolyzed water hydrogen output approach is relevant to generate sustainable and alternative energy.
[97]Review about lignocellulosic biomass
pyrolysis		One of the main challenges are in the pretreatment approaches.

7. Discussion and Conclusions

The main objectives of this study were to highlight the main insights from the literature, about the topic of renewable and sustainable energy through a systematic review supported by a more objective approach based on bibliometric analysis. For this purpose, an alternative methodology was proposed, which has been referred to in this study as “Biblio4Research”. This approach is based on bibliographic data and bibliographic coupling links so as to identify the most relevant documents for the topic addressed. The Biblio4Research methodology was implemented for the topic of renewable and sustainable energy, and may be easily applied in other fields.
The bibliographic coupling links have been considered by the literature for assessments in several fields of science. They are the most appropriate to achieve the objectives proposed by this research because of the following advantages: they consider the documents as items; the number of documents is considered as nodes in a more stable context over time; more recent publications cite older ones giving an updated framework about the issues analyzed; and the citations shared by documents are indicators of their interrelationships covering the same subject.
The data analysis has shown that the most productive authors are the following: Hameiri, Z.; Hosseini, S.E.; Foley, A.; and Duic, N. The most productive affiliation countries are China, the United States, India, Malaysia, and the United Kingdom/England. Italy, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, and France are the countries that possess more publications about renewable and sustainable energy from the European Union. The organizations with a greater number of documents are those from Australia, China, the United Kingdom, Croatia, and Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Energies, Renewable Energy, and Energy are the top sources. From these findings, it is worth mentioning that the network of countries and organizations does not follow the performance of some affiliated authors. Conversely, the European Union could promote more networks about these issues among their researchers. In addition, the documents about these topics are generally published in sources focused on the field of energy production.
The systematic reviews show that the documents analyzed are focused mainly on specific subjects (biomass, late transition metals, solar power, hydronic asphalt pavement, polygeneration, bioconversion, extreme learning machines and deep learning models, computational optimization approaches, hydrogen production, and biofuel generation). They are focused on specific countries, including Australia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. It seems that the large number of documents available on the scientific platforms (Scopus and WoS) hampers the consideration for interdisciplinary topics. The approach that has been proposed may provide an interesting suggestion to overcoming these constraints. In any case, there is a field for some topics to become more interdisciplinary. In fact, the topics related to renewable and sustainable energy are transversal to several areas of science, where the environmental dimension is a concern. The use of biomass as a source of energy is an example where the interdisciplinary field may bring interesting insights; namely, to solve associated problems [119], to recover nutrients for a more circular economy [120], and to control the quality of solid fuels [121].
In terms of practical implications, it is recommended that researchers conduct more studies considering broader topics with findings that may favor more stakeholders. It could be important to create the right environment for increasing the network among researchers worldwide, particularly in the European Union. Concerning policy recommendations, it could be important that governments worldwide, including the European Union institutions, create policies and plans to increase research and the network for renewable and sustainable energy frameworks. For future research, the application of the approach in this study is recommended for even broader topics related to renewable and sustainable energy.

Funding

This work is funded by National Funds through the FCT–Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project Refª UIDB/00681/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Furthermore we would like to thank the CERNAS Research Centre and the Polytechnic Institute of Viseu for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Web of Science Web of Science—Core Collection. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/basic-search (accessed on 19 July 2021).
  2. Devadiga, D.; Selvakumar, M.; Shetty, P.; Sridhar Santosh, M.; Chandrabose, R.S.; Karazhanov, S. Recent Developments in Metal-Free Organic Sensitizers Derived from Carbazole, Triphenylamine, and Phenothiazine for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 6584–6643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ishak, A.; Siregar, K.; Ginting, R.; Manik, A. Implementation Statistical Quality Control (SQC) and Fuzzy Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA): A Systematic Review. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (ici&me 2020); Iop Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 1003, p. 012098. [Google Scholar]
  4. Oliveira, H.; Moutinho, V. Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis. Energies 2021, 14, 4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rehman, W.U.; Bhatti, A.R.; Awan, A.B.; Sajjad, I.A.; Khan, A.A.; Bo, R.; Haroon, S.S.; Amin, S.; Tlili, I.; Oboreh-Snapps, O. The Penetration of Renewable and Sustainable Energy in Asia: A State-of-the-Art Review on Net-Metering. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 170364–170388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zuo, J.; Pullen, S.; Palmer, J.; Bennetts, H.; Chileshe, N.; Ma, T. Impacts of Heat Waves and Corresponding Measures: A Review. J. Clean Prod. 2015, 92, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. BMJ 2009, 339, b2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martinho, V.J.P.D. Food Marketing as a Special Ingredient in Consumer Choices: The Main Insights from Existing Literature. Foods 2020, 9, 1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martinho, V.J.P.D. Agri-Food Contexts in Mediterranean Regions: Contributions to Better Resources Management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martinho, V.J.P.D. Insights into Circular Economy Indicators: Emphasizing Dimensions of Sustainability. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2021, 10, 100119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martinho, V.J.P.D.; Guiné, R.D.P.F. Integrated-Smart Agriculture: Contexts and Assumptions for a Broader Concept. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kent Baker, H.; Pandey, N.; Kumar, S.; Haldar, A. A Bibliometric Analysis of Board Diversity: Current Status, Development, and Future Research Directions. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 108, 232–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Krnic Martinic, M.; Pieper, D.; Glatt, A.; Puljak, L. Definition of a Systematic Review Used in Overviews of Systematic Reviews, Meta-Epidemiological Studies and Textbooks. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2019, 19, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B. Bibliographic Coupling, Common Abstract Stems and Clustering: A Comparison of Two Document-Document Similarity Approaches in the Context of Science Mapping. Scientometrics 2008, 76, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jarneving, B. Bibliographic Coupling and Its Application to Research-Front and Other Core Documents. J. Informetr. 2007, 1, 287–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.16. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.16.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  17. Batagelj, V. On Fractional Approach to Analysis of Linked Networks. Scientometrics 2020, 123, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, Y.; Yan, E. Searching Bibliographic Data Using Graphs: A Visual Graph Query Interface. J. Informetr. 2016, 10, 1092–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdulla, A.; Schell, K.R.; Schell, M.C. Comparing the Evolution of Risk Culture in Radiation Oncology, Aviation, and Nuclear Power. J. Patient Saf. 2020, 16, E352–E358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adams, J.; Light, R. Mapping Interdisciplinary Fields: Efficiencies, Gaps and Redundancies in HIV/AIDS Research. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Agostini, L.; Nosella, A. Industry 4.0 and Business Models: A Bibliometric Literature Review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 2021, 27, 1633–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anandh, G.; PrasannaVenkatesan, S.; Goh, M.; Mathiyazhagan, K. Reuse Assessment of WEEE: Systematic Review of Emerging Themes and Research Directions. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 287, 112335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bautista-Bernal, I.; Quintana-Garcia, C.; Marchante-Lara, M. Research Trends in Occupational Health and Social Responsibility: A Bibliometric Analysis. Saf. Sci. 2021, 137, 105167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, Y.-C.; Padliansyah, R.; Lin, T.-C. The Relationship and Development Trend of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Literature Utilizing Bibliographic Coupling Analysis and Social Network Analysis. Manag. Decis. 2019, 58, 601–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bellucci, M.; Marzi, G.; Orlando, B.; Ciampi, F. Journal of Intellectual Capital: A Review of Emerging Themes and Future Trends. J. Intellect. Cap. 2021, 22, 744–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bresciani, S.; Ciampi, F.; Meli, F.; Ferraris, A. Using Big Data for Co-Innovation Processes: Mapping the Field of Data-Driven Innovation, Proposing Theoretical Developments and Providing a Research Agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 60, 102347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Budler, M.; Zupic, I.; Trkman, P. The Development of Business Model Research: A Bibliometric Review. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 135, 480–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Buhmann, A.; Ihlen, O.; Aaen-Stockdale, C. Connecting the Dots: A Bibliometric Review of Habermasian Theory in Public Relations Research. J. Commun. Manag. 2019, 23, 444–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Caneppele Bussler, N.R.; Hsu, P.L.; Storopoli, J.E.; Maccari, E.A. Scenarios for the future of distance education. Rev. Gest. Tecnol. 2019, 19, 4–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, S.-Y.; Chang, C.-N.; Nien, Y.-H.; Ke, H.-R. Concept Extraction and Clustering for Search Result Organization and Virtual Community Construction. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 2012, 9, 323–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ciampi, F.; Marzi, G.; Demi, S.; Faraoni, M. The Big Data-Business Strategy Interconnection: A Grand Challenge for Knowledge Management. A Review and Future Perspectives. J. Knowl. Manag. 2020, 24, 1157–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Colavizza, G. A Diachronic Study of Historiography. Scientometrics 2018, 117, 2117–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Filippo, D. What is publishing Brazil in Library and Information Science? Study of international papers and clustering analysis (Web of Science 2000 to 2014). Em Questao 2015, 21, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Filippo, D.; Levin, L. Detection and analysis of “bibliographic clusters” in Iberoamerican publications on science, technology and society (1970–2013). Investig. Bibliotecol. 2017, 123–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  35. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mills, A.; Pattnaik, D. Journal of Marketing Education: A Retrospective Overview Between 1979 and 2019. J. Market. Educ. 2021, 43, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Pattnaik, D.; Campagna, C. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice: A Retrospective of 2005–2019. J. Market. Theory Pract. 2020, 28, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Pattnaik, D. The Journal of Consumer Marketing at Age 35: A Retrospective Overview. J. Consum. Mark. 2021, 38, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Freire, R.R.; Verissimo, J.M.C. Mapping Co-Creation and Co-Destruction in Tourism: A Bibliographic Coupling Analysis. Anatolia 2021, 32, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fu, X.; Niu, Z.; Yeh, M.-K. Research Trends in Sustainable Operation: A Bibliographic Coupling Clustering Analysis from 1988 to 2016. Cluster Comput. 2016, 19, 2211–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Georges, P. Western Classical Music Development: A Statistical Analysis of Composers Similarity, Differentiation and Evolution. Scientometrics 2017, 112, 21–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gao, X.; Guan, J. Networks of Scientific Journals: An Exploration of Chinese Patent Data. Scientometrics 2009, 80, 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gil-Barragan, J.M.; Aguilera-Castillo, A.; Suarez Galeano, L. A Bibliometric Analysis of China-Latin America Economic and Political Relations. Lat. Am. Policy 2020, 11, 290–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guan, J.; Xu, X.; Xing, L. Analysis of Inter-Country Input-Output Table Based on Bibliographic Coupling Network: How Industrial Sectors on the GVC Compete for Production Resources. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2018, 32, 1850063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jose, A.; Shanmugam, P. Supply Chain Issues in SME Food Sector: A Systematic Review. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2019, 17, 19–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Karakus, M.; Usak, M.; Ersozlu, A. Emotions in Learning, Teaching, and Leadership: A Bibliometric Review of Asian Literature (1990–2018). SAGE Open 2021, 11, 2158244020988865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lerena, O.; Barletta, F.; Fiorentin, F.; Suarez, D.; Yoguel, G. Big Data of Innovation Literature at the Firm Level: A Review Based on Social Network and Text Mining Techniques. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2021, 30, 134–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meyer-Broetz, F.; Stelzer, B.; Schiebel, E.; Brecht, L. Mapping the Technology and Innovation Management Literature Using Hybrid Bibliometric Networks. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2018, 77, 235–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sanchez-Famoso, V.; Maseda, A.; Iturralde, T.; Danes, S.M.; Aparicio, G. The Potential of Internal Social Capital in Organizations: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2020, 58, 32–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schroder, K.; Tiberius, V.; Bouncken, R.B.; Kraus, S. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Mapping a Research Field. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2021, 27, 753–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kessler, M. Bibliographic Coupling Between Scientific Papers. Am. Doc. 1963, 14, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kessler, M. Bibliographic Coupling Extended in Time—10 Case-Histories. Inf. Storage Retr. 1963, 1, 169–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kessler, M. Comparison of the Results of Bibliographic Coupling and Analytic Subject Indexing. Am. Doc. 1965, 16, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Small, H.; Koenig, M. Journal Clustering Using a Bibliographic Coupling Method. Inf. Process. Manag. 1977, 13, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vladutz, G.; Cook, J. Bibliographic Coupling and Subject Relatedness. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1984, 21, 204–207. [Google Scholar]
  55. Weinberg, B. Bibliographic Coupling—Review. Inf. Storage Retr. 1974, 10, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kostoff, R.N. Literature-Related Discovery and Innovation—Update. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79, 789–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Van Schalkwyk, F.; Dudek, J.; Costas, R. Communities of Shared Interests and Cognitive Bridges: The Case of the Anti-Vaccination Movement on Twitter. Scientometrics 2020, 125, 1499–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, M. Visualizing the Studies on Smart Cities in the Past Two Decades: A Two-Dimensional Perspective. Scientometrics 2019, 120, 683–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, W.; Nanetti, A.; Cheong, S.A. Knowledge Evolution in Physics Research: An Analysis of Bibliographic Coupling Networks. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mura, M.; Longo, M.; Micheli, P.; Bolzani, D. The Evolution of Sustainability Measurement Research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2018, 20, 661–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tiberius, V.; Siglow, C.; Sendra-Garcia, J. Scenarios in Business and Management: The Current Stock and Research Opportunities. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 121, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vogel, R.; Guettel, W.H. The Dynamic Capability View in Strategic Management: A Bibliometric Review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2013, 15, 426–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Martyn, J. Bibliographic Coupling. J. Doc. 1964, 20, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Masmoudi, A.; Bellaaj, H.; Drira, K.; Jmaiel, M. Aco-Training-Based Approach for the Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification of Research Papers. Expert Syst. 2021, 38, e12613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Viebahn, P.; Chappin, E.J.L. Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage-A Bibliometric Analysis. Energies 2018, 11, 2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mas-Verdu, F.; Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J.-M.; Nieto-Aleman, P.A.; Roig-Tierno, N. A Systematic Mapping Review of European Political Science. Eur. Polit. Sci. 2021, 20, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, S.-H.; Liao, H.-L.; Pi, S.-M.; Hu, J.-W. Development of a Patent Retrieval and Analysis Platform—A Hybrid Approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 7864–7868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khan, M.A.; Ali, I.; Ashraf, R. A Bibliometric Review of the Special Issues of Psychology & Marketing: 1984–2020. Psychol. Mark. 2020, 37, 1144–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumar, S.; Pandey, N.; Haldar, A. Twenty Years of Public Management Review (PMR): A Bibliometric Overview. Public Manag. Rev. 2020, 22, 1876–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mason, R.E.; White, A.; Bucini, G.; Anderzen, J.; Mendez, V.E.; Merrill, S.C. The Evolving Landscape of Agroecological Research. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 45, 551–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Skute, I. Opening the Black Box of Academic Entrepreneurship: A Bibliometric Analysis. Scientometrics 2019, 120, 237–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Meyer, T. Decarbonizing Road Freight Transportation—A Bibliometric and Network Analysis. Transport. Res. Part D-Transport. Environ. 2020, 89, 102619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Noh, H.; Song, Y.-K.; Lee, S. Identifying Emerging Core Technologies for the Future: Case Study of Patents Published by Leading Telecommunication Organizations. Telecommun. Policy 2016, 40, 956–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Patricio, L.D.; Ferreira, J.J. Blockchain Security Research: Theorizing through Bibliographic-Coupling Analysis. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2021, 18, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Soos, S.; Kiss, A. Informetrics and the Study of Science-Society Communications: A Bibliometric Scoping Review. Scientometrics 2020, 124, 825–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sureka, R.; Kumar, S.; Mangla, S.K.; Hourneaux Junior, F. Fifteen Years of International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management (2004–2018). Int. J. Product Perform. Manag. 2021, 70, 1092–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tsai, F.M.; Bui, T.-D.; Tseng, M.-L.; Lim, M.K.; Hu, J. Municipal Solid Waste Management in a Circular Economy: A Data-Driven Bibliometric Analysis. J. Clean Prod. 2020, 275, 124132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, Q.; Sandstrom, U. Defining the Role of Cognitive Distance in the Peer Review Process with an Explorative Study of a Grant Scheme in Infection Biology. Res. Evaluat. 2015, 24, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, M.; Porter, A.L.; Wang, Z.L. Evolutionary Trend Analysis of Nanogenerator Research Based on a Novel Perspective of Phased Bibliographic Coupling. Nano Energy 2017, 34, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Najera-Sanchez, J.-J.; Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M.; Mora-Valentin, E.-M. Mapping Value Co-Creation Literature in the Technology and Innovation Management Field: A Bibliographic Coupling Analysis. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 588648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Nicolaisen, J.; Frandsen, T.F. Bibliometric Evolution: Is the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology Transforming Into a Specialty Journal? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2015, 66, 1082–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Steinhaeuser, V.P.S.; de Oliveira Paula, F.; van Aduard de Macedo-Soares, T.D.L. Internationalization of SMEs: A Systematic Review of 20 Years of Research. J. Int. Entrep. 2021, 19, 164–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Thijs, B.; Zhang, L.; Glanzel, W. Bibliographic Coupling and Hierarchical Clustering for the Validation and Improvement of Subject-Classification Schemes. Scientometrics 2015, 105, 1453–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Scopus Scopus Database. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/ (accessed on 19 July 2021).
  85. Bastian, M.; Heymann, S.; Jacomy, M. Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Available online: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/13937 (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  86. Gephi Gephi—The Open Graph Viz Platform. Available online: https://gephi.org/ (accessed on 19 July 2021).
  87. VOSviewer VOSviewer—Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com// (accessed on 19 July 2021).
  88. Rochat, Y. Closeness Centrality Extended to Unconnected Graphs: The Harmonic Centrality Index. Available online: file:///C:/Users/MDPI/AppData/Local/Temp/[EN]ASNA09.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  89. Martinho, V.J.P.D. Bibliometric Analysis for Working Capital: Identifying Gaps, Co-Authorships and Insights from a Literature Survey. Int. J. Financ. Stud. 2021, 9, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Abomohra, A.E.-F.; Elshobary, M. Biodiesel, Bioethanol, and Biobutanol Production from Microalgae. In Microalgae Biotechnology for Development of Biofuel and Wastewater Treatment; Alam, M.D.A., Wang, Z., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 293–321. ISBN 9789811322648. [Google Scholar]
  91. Hosseini, S.E.; Wahid, M.A.; Ganjehkaviri, A. An Overview of Renewable Hydrogen Production from Thermochemical Process of Oil Palm Solid Waste in Malaysia. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 94, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kawale, H.D.; Kishore, N. Comprehensive Study on Thermochemical Putrefaction of Delonix Regia in Non-Catalytic, Catalytic and Hydro-Catalytic Pyrolysis Atmospheres. Renew. Energy 2021, 173, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kumar, S.; Paritosh, K.; Pareek, N.; Chawade, A.; Vivekanand, V. De-Construction of Major Indian Cereal Crop Residues through Chemical Pretreatment for Improved Biogas Production: An Overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rehman, M.S.U.; Rashid, N.; Saif, A.; Mahmood, T.; Han, J.-I. Potential of Bioenergy Production from Industrial Hemp (Cannabis Sativa): Pakistan Perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 18, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ghalandari, T.; Hasheminejad, N.; Van den bergh, W.; Vuye, C. A Critical Review on Large-Scale Research Prototypes and Actual Projects of Hydronic Asphalt Pavement Systems. Renew. Energy 2021, 177, 1421–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rajeswari, G.; Jacob, S.; Chandel, A.K.; Kumar, V. Unlocking the Potential of Insect and Ruminant Host Symbionts for Recycling of Lignocellulosic Carbon with a Biorefinery Approach: A Review. Microb. Cell Factories 2021, 20, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zadeh, Z.E.; Abdulkhani, A.; Aboelazayem, O.; Saha, B. Recent Insights into Lignocellulosic Biomass Pyrolysis: A Critical Review on Pretreatment, Characterization, and Products Upgrading. Processes 2020, 8, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ali, M.; Prasad, R.; Xiang, Y.; Sankaran, A.; Deo, R.C.; Xiao, F.; Zhu, S. Advanced Extreme Learning Machines vs. Deep Learning Models for Peak Wave Energy Period Forecasting: A Case Study in Queensland, Australia. Renew. Energy 2021, 177, 1031–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Baños, R.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F.; Montoya, F.G.; Gil, C.; Alcayde, A.; Gómez, J. Optimization Methods Applied to Renewable and Sustainable Energy: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1753–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hosseini, S.E.; Wahid, M.A. Hydrogen Production from Renewable and Sustainable Energy Resources: Promising Green Energy Carrier for Clean Development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 850–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Amran, Y.H.A.; Amran, Y.H.M.; Alyousef, R.; Alabduljabbar, H. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Production in Saudi Arabia According to Saudi Vision 2030; Current Status and Future Prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 247, 119602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hasan, M.H.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Nur, H. A Review on Energy Scenario and Sustainable Energy in Indonesia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2316–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Aydin, H.; Merey, S. Design of Electrical Submersible Pump System in Geothermal Wells: A Case Study from West Anatolia, Turkey. Energy 2021, 230, 120891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Che Lah, N.A. Late Transition Metal Nanocomplexes: Applications for Renewable Energy Conversion and Storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 111103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ganesh, I. Solar Fuels Vis-à-Vis Electricity Generation from Sunlight: The Current State-of-the-Art (a Review). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 44, 904–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hani, M.R.; Mahidin, M.; Erdiwansyah, E.; Husin, H.; Khairil, K.; Hamdani, H. An Overview of Polygeneration as a Sustainable Energy Solution in the Future. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2020, 74, 85–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hosseini, S.E.; Abdul Wahid, M. The Role of Renewable and Sustainable Energy in the Energy Mix of Malaysia: A Review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2014, 38, 1769–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Joshi, G.; Pandey, J.K.; Rana, S.; Rawat, D.S. Challenges and Opportunities for the Application of Biofuel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 850–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, Z.; Song, M.; Zhu, W.; Zhuang, W.; Du, X.; Tian, L. MOF-Derived Hollow Heterostructures for Advanced Electrocatalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 439, 213946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Liew, W.H.; Hassim, M.H.; Ng, D.K.S. Review of Evolution, Technology and Sustainability Assessments of Biofuel Production. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 71, 11–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liu, Y.; Dong, X.; Yuan, Q.; Liang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Qu, X.; Dong, B. In-Situ Synthesis of WO3–x/MoO3–x Heterojunction with Abundant Oxygen Vacancies for Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 621, 126582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Long, F.; Liu, W.; Jiang, X.; Zhai, Q.; Cao, X.; Jiang, J.; Xu, J. State-of-the-Art Technologies for Biofuel Production from Triglycerides: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 148, 111269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pandiyan, K.; Singh, A.; Singh, S.; Saxena, A.K.; Nain, L. Technological Interventions for Utilization of Crop Residues and Weedy Biomass for Second Generation Bio-Ethanol Production. Renew. Energy 2019, 132, 723–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Raheem, A.; Wan Azlina, W.A.K.G.; Taufiq Yap, Y.H.; Danquah, M.K.; Harun, R. Thermochemical Conversion of Microalgal Biomass for Biofuel Production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 49, 990–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rostami, R.; Khoshnava, S.M.; Lamit, H.; Streimikiene, D.; Mardani, A. An Overview of Afghanistan’s Trends toward Renewable and Sustainable Energies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 1440–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Shahabuddin, M.; Alim, M.A.; Alam, T.; Mofijur, M.; Ahmed, S.F.; Perkins, G. A Critical Review on the Development and Challenges of Concentrated Solar Power Technologies. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Strantzali, E.; Aravossis, K. Decision Making in Renewable Energy Investments: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 885–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wu, Y.; Yao, J.; Gao, J. Interface Chemistry of Platinum-Based Materials for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution in Alkaline Conditions. In Methods for Electrocatalysis: Advanced Materials and Allied Applications; Inamuddin, B.R., Asiri, A.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 453–473. ISBN 978-3-030-27161-9. [Google Scholar]
  119. Hardy, T.; Arora, A.; Pawlak-Kruczek, H.; Rafajłowicz, W.; Wietrzych, J.; Niedźwiecki, Ł.; Vishwajeet; Mościcki, K. Non-Destructive Diagnostic Methods for Fire-Side Corrosion Risk Assessment of Industrial Scale Boilers, Burning Low Quality Solid Biofuels—A Mini Review. Energies 2021, 14, 7132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Aragón-Briceño, C.I.; Pozarlik, A.K.; Bramer, E.A.; Niedzwiecki, L.; Pawlak-Kruczek, H.; Brem, G. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Wet Biomass from Nitrogen and Phosphorus Approach: A Review. Renew. Energy 2021, 171, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pawlak-Kruczek, H.; Arora, A.; Gupta, A.; Saeed, M.A.; Niedzwiecki, L.; Andrews, G.; Phylaktou, H.; Gibbs, B.; Newlaczyl, A.; Livesey, P.M. Biocoal—Quality Control and Assurance. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 135, 105509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Environments 09 00028 g001
Figure 1. Steps to find the most relevant documents for systematic review, considering the proposed Biblio4Review approach.
Figure 1. Steps to find the most relevant documents for systematic review, considering the proposed Biblio4Review approach.
Environments 09 00028 g001
Environments 09 00028 g002
Figure 2. Topics and sub-topics related to renewable and sustainable dimensions.
Figure 2. Topics and sub-topics related to renewable and sustainable dimensions.
Environments 09 00028 g002
Table 1. Top-20 networked authors from Scopus and WoS databases for bibliographic coupling links.
Table 1. Top-20 networked authors from Scopus and WoS databases for bibliographic coupling links.
ScopusWoS
AuthorsDocumentsAuthorsDocuments
Hameiri Z.20Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan9
Hosseini S.E.9Foley, Aoife8
Li Y.9Wahid, Mazlan Abdul7
liu J.9Duic, Neven6
Foley A.8Markovska, Natasa5
Li J.7Puksec, Tomislav5
Liu Y.7Abdulkhani, Ali2
Duić N.6Ajayan, J.2
Pukšec T.6Alam, MD. MAHBUB2
Wahid M.A.6Ali, Mumtaz2
Zhang L.6Cao, Yijia2
Zhang Y.6Chen, Wei2
Zhou Y.6Daud, Wan Mohd Ashri Wan2
Li S.5David, ghislain2
Li X.5Dehghani-sanij, Alireza2
Markovska N.5Demadis, Konstantinos d.2
Wang H.5Dusseault, Maurice B.2
Wang J.5Ewees, Ahmed A.2
Wang S.5Fang, Baling2
Wang Y.5Ganesh, Ibram2
Table 2. Top-20 networked countries from Scopus and WoS databases for bibliographic coupling links.
Table 2. Top-20 networked countries from Scopus and WoS databases for bibliographic coupling links.
ScopusWoS
CountriesDocumentsCountriesDocuments
China140Peoples R China109
United States108USA69
India66India41
Malaysia62Malaysia40
United Kingdom53England26
Australia42Turkey23
Italy31Italy22
Turkey27South Korea21
South Korea25Spain20
Spain25Saudi Arabia17
Saudi Arabia24Brazil16
Germany22Germany16
Iran22Australia15
Canada20Iran15
Brazil17Canada13
Indonesia15The Netherlands12
The Netherlands15France11
France14Pakistan10
South Africa14Scotland10
Taiwan14South Africa10
Table 3. Top-20 networked organizations from Scopus and WoS databases for bibliographic coupling links.
Table 3. Top-20 networked organizations from Scopus and WoS databases for bibliographic coupling links.
ScopusWoS
OrganizationsDocumentsOrganizationsDocuments
school of photovoltaic and renewable energy engineering, unsw australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia15Chinese Acad Sci14
school of mechanical & aerospace engineering, queen’s university belfast, ashby building, stranmillis road, Belfast, BT9 5AH, United Kingdom4Univ Teknol Malaysia14
department of energy, power engineering and environment, university of zagreb, faculty of mechanical engineering and naval architecture, ivana lučića 5, Zagreb, 10002, Croatia3Univ Malaya10
high-speed reacting flow laboratory, faculty of mechanical engineering, universiti teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Utm Skudai, johor, Malaysia3Tsinghua Univ9
institute for turbulence-noise-vibration interaction and control, shenzhen graduate school, harbin institute of technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China3Queens Univ Belfast7
school of economics and management, north china electric power university, Beijing, 102206, China3Univ Zagreb7
school of environmental science and engineering, shanghai jiao tong university, Shanghai, 200240, China3Aalto Univ6
university of the west of scotland, school of engineering, high street, Paisley, PA1 2BE, United Kingdom3Univ Waterloo6
aksaray university, industrial engineering department, Aksaray, Turkey2City Univ Hong Kong5
center for engineering research, research institute, king fahd university of petroleum and minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia2Harbin Inst Technol5
college of electrical and information engineering, hunan university, Changsha, 410082, China2Hong Kong Polytech Univ5
department of catalysis and chemical reaction engineering, national institute of chemistry, hajdrihova 19, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia2Hunan Univ5
department of chemical engineering, universitas syiah kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia2King Saud Univ5
department of earth and environmental sciences, university of waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada2Univ Nottingham5
department of industrial engineering and engineering management, national tsing hua university, Hsinchu, Taiwan2Univ Sao Paulo5
department of mechanical engineering, universitas syiah kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia2Univ West Scotland5
department of sustainable and renewable energy engineering, university of sharjah, United Arab Emirates2Georgia Inst Technol4
department of wood and paper sciences and technology, faculty of natural resources, university of tehran, Karaj, 1417466191, Iran2Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol4
e & m school, beihang university, Beijing, 100191, China2King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals4
faculty of management, universiti teknologi malaysia (utm), Skudai Johor, 81310, Malaysia2Univ Padua4
Table 4. Top-20 networked sources from Scopus and WoS databases for bibliographic coupling links.
Table 4. Top-20 networked sources from Scopus and WoS databases for bibliographic coupling links.
ScopusWoS
SourcesDocumentsSourcesDocuments
renewable and sustainable energy reviews160renewable & sustainable energy reviews106
journal of renewable and sustainable energy45energies11
progress in photovoltaics: research and applications20renewable energy11
renewable energy14energy10
energies11international journal of hydrogen energy9
energy9energy conversion and management8
energy conversion and management8journal of cleaner production8
international journal of hydrogen energy8acs sustainable chemistry & engineering6
journal of cleaner production8applied energy6
applied energy7fuel6
fuel6journal of renewable and sustainable energy6
iop conference series: materials science and engineering6sustainability6
sustainability (switzerland)6rsc advances5
acs sustainable chemistry and engineering5electrochimica acta4
energy storage materials5energy storage materials4
green energy and technology5international journal of energy research4
international journal of energy research5solar energy materials and solar cells4
rsc advances5acs applied materials & interfaces3
electrochimica acta4applied microbiology and biotechnology3
energy policy4bioenergy research3
Table 5. Top-20 documents with higher harmonic closeness centrality from Scopus database for bibliographic coupling links.
Table 5. Top-20 documents with higher harmonic closeness centrality from Scopus database for bibliographic coupling links.
DocumentsDOIHarmonic Closeness Centrality
Rajeswari G. (2021)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-021-01597-00.876078
Ghalandari T. (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.0100.702586
Ali M. (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.0520.598779
Shahabuddin M. (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.1014340.561782
Ibram G. (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.0190.556753
Joshi G. (2017)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.1850.554957
Baños R. (2011)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.0080.535201
Hosseini S.E. (2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.1120.534842
Raheem A. (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.1860.533764
Pandiyan K. (2019)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.0490.530891
Abomohra A.E.-F. (2019)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2264-8_130.530532
Liew W.H. (2014)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.0060.525144
Hosseini S.E. (2014)https://doi.org/10.1002/er.31900.523707
Rehman M.S.U. (2013)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.0190.520833
Rostami R. (2017)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.1720.520474
Long F. (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.1112690.519756
Hani M.R. (2020)https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.74.2.851190.518319
Zadeh Z.E. (2020)https://doi.org/10.3390/pr80707990.517601
Hosseini S.E. (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.0120.515086
Wu Y. (2020)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27161-9_180.514727
Table 6. Top-20 documents with higher harmonic closeness centrality from WoS database for bibliographic coupling links.
Table 6. Top-20 documents with higher harmonic closeness centrality from WoS database for bibliographic coupling links.
DocumentsDOIHarmonic Closeness Centrality
Aydin (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.1208910.893978
Kawale (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.1390.702714
Liu (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.1265820.587362
Li (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.2139460.570823
Ganesh (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.0190.567006
Joshi (2017)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.1850.557252
Rostami (2017)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.1720.552587
Hosseini (2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.1120.547074
Banos (2011)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.0080.546226
Amran (2020)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.1196020.537744
Raheem (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.1860.53732
Liew (2014)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.0060.53732
Hosseini (2014)https://doi.org/10.1002/er.31900.536472
Hasan (2012)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.0070.536472
Pandiyan (2019)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.0490.535199
Lah (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.1111030.530534
Rehman (2013)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.0190.528838
Hosseini (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.0120.528414
Strantzali (2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.0210.527566
Kumar (2018)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.0490.527142
Table 7. Top documents with higher harmonic closeness centrality from Scopus and WoS top-20 documents, after removing duplicates, for bibliographic coupling links.
Table 7. Top documents with higher harmonic closeness centrality from Scopus and WoS top-20 documents, after removing duplicates, for bibliographic coupling links.
Documents DOIHarmonic Closeness Centrality
Aydin (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.1208910.893978
Rajeswari (2021)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-021-01597-00.876078
Kawale (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.1390.702714
Ghalandari (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.0100.702586
Ali (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.0520.598779
Liu (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.1265820.587362
Li (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.2139460.570823
Ganesh (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.0190.567006
Shahabuddin (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.1014340.561782
Joshi (2017)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.1850.557252
Rostami (2017)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.1720.552587
Hosseini (2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.1120.547074
Banos (2011)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.0080.546226
Amran (2020)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.1196020.537744
Liew (2014)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.0060.53732
Raheem (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.1860.53732
Hasan (2012)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.0070.536472
Hosseini (2014)https://doi.org/10.1002/er.31900.536472
Pandiyan (2019)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.0490.535199
Lah (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.1111030.530534
Abomohra (2019)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2264-8_130.530532
Rehman (2013)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.0190.528838
Hosseini (2015)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.0120.528414
Strantzali (2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.0210.527566
Kumar (2018)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.0490.527142
Long (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.1112690.519756
Hani (2020)https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.74.2.851190.518319
Zadeh (2020)https://doi.org/10.3390/pr80707990.517601
Wu (2020)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27161-9_180.514727
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martinho, V.J.P.D. Bibliographic Coupling Links: Alternative Approaches to Carrying Out Systematic Reviews about Renewable and Sustainable Energy. Environments 2022, 9, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9020028

AMA Style

Martinho VJPD. Bibliographic Coupling Links: Alternative Approaches to Carrying Out Systematic Reviews about Renewable and Sustainable Energy. Environments. 2022; 9(2):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9020028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martinho, Vítor João Pereira Domingues. 2022. "Bibliographic Coupling Links: Alternative Approaches to Carrying Out Systematic Reviews about Renewable and Sustainable Energy" Environments 9, no. 2: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9020028

APA Style

Martinho, V. J. P. D. (2022). Bibliographic Coupling Links: Alternative Approaches to Carrying Out Systematic Reviews about Renewable and Sustainable Energy. Environments, 9(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9020028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop