Next Article in Journal
Intensity and Driving Forces of Land Abandonment in Eastern Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Episode-Based Analysis of Size-Resolved Carbonaceous Aerosol Compositions in Wintertime of Xinxiang: Implication for the Haze Formation Processes in Central China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/app10103499
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Polyphenolics in Extracts from Natural Materials on Metabolic Activity of Metastatic Melanoma WM-266-4 Cells

by
Taja Žitek
1,
Barbara Dariš
2,
Matjaž Finšgar
3,
Željko Knez
4,
Dragana Bjelić
1 and
Maša Knez Hrnčič
1,*
1
Laboratory for Separation Processes and Product Design, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
2
Department of Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
3
Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry and Industrial Analysis, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
4
Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(10), 3499; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103499
Submission received: 25 March 2020 / Revised: 14 May 2020 / Accepted: 18 May 2020 / Published: 19 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Food Science and Technology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The importance of natural crops in medicine and pharmacy is growing. Beside bioactive compounds used directly as therapeutic agents, there are also raw materials used for drug synthesis or as a basic model for new biologically active compounds. In this paper, the optimum conditions for material extraction of Curcuma longa, Lycium barbarum, Equisetum arvense, Vitis vinifera, and Rosmarinus officinalis were investigated to achieve high antioxidant levels. The main aim of this study was to verify the correlation between the content of antioxidants, proanthocyanidins and total phenolic substances for certain extracts from the raw materials (Curcuma longa, Lycium barbarum, Equisetum arvense, Vitis vinifera and Rosmarinus officinalis) and the reduction of the metabolic activity of skin cancer cells.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The incidence of malignant melanoma, a type of skin cancer, has been increasing during the last several decades; it is now the fifth most common cancer in males and the seventh in the female population in the United States [1]. The treatment of melanoma remains challenging, as many chemotherapeutic agents show a limited selectivity for tumor cells and cause adverse effects [2]. Moreover, resistance to chemotherapy is frequently observed in melanoma therapy [3]. Many clinically approved anticancer drugs contain ingredients of a natural origin, such as natural products, derivatives or synthesized molecules, which are from natural products [4,5]. Some well-known anti-cancer drugs include ingredients such as cantharanthus alkaloids, colchicine, etoposide, and taxol [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Plant-based secondary metabolites, such as polyphenol compounds, alkaloids, and terpenes possess diverse pharmacological properties, including cytotoxic and cancer chemopreventative effects [12]. The latter may appear during different phases of malignant tumor development and involve various mechanisms, such as protecting DNA from oxidative damage. Several clinical studies have shown the anti-proliferative effect of natural extracts on different cancer cell lines [13,14,15,16,17]. Most of the surveys were performed in vitro, except those specifically indicated, which were in vivo.
In addition, some studies have shown that various nutritional factors affect cancer rates and even prevent malignancy. Some fruits, vegetables and herbs contain large amounts of nutrient and non-nutrient phytochemicals and appear to be effective antioxidative agents. It has been reported that plant-based extracts were applied to different cells in order to study their antiproliferative activity [18]. For further analysis, different extraction methods were used where the extracts were obtained by methods such as supercritical fluid and pressurized liquid extraction, in addition to conventional procedures [19]. The most frequently utilized solvent was methanol in combination with supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2). Extracts obtained by supercritical CO2 extraction have revealed antiproliferative effect, especially equated to Soxhlet extracts [20].
Extracts from Rosemary were applied to several different human cancer cell lines. Active compounds (carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid) and extracts were applied to NCI-H82 (human, small cellular pneumonia, cancer), DU-145 (human, prostate, cancer), Hep-3B (human, breast, adenocarcinoma), PC-3 (human, prostate, adenocarcinoma), MDA-MB-231 (human, breast, liver, carcinoma, hepatocellular), and K-562 (human chronic myeloid leukemia, adenocarcinoma). The MTT test was used, where extracts were shown to have many different cytotoxic effects against cell lines [20]. It was established that extract of rosemary has antiproliferative activity on A2780 human cancer cells and on A2780CP70 daughter-cell line [13].
Pre-clinical studies based on in vitro and animal models of different cancer cell lines, including breast, cervical, colon, gastric, hepatic, leukemia, oral epithelial, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate, have consistently shown that the curcuma extract, curcumin, possesses anti-cancer activity.
Additionally, the effect of turmeric on A375 melanoma cells was investigated and various concentrations of curcumin were used. The researchers observed cellular morphology and determined migration, invasion, proliferation, and apoptosis of A375 cells in vitro. The final process also revealed that curcumin caused a major change in the morphology of the A375 cells [21]. Other studies indicate an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic, and antiproliferative cell line activity, particularly in breast cancer (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, BT-48), melanoma cell lines (C32, G-361 and WM 266-4), and HNSCC lines (CAL27, UM-SCC14A, UM-SCC1). The highest concentration was 10 mg/mL [16,17].
The arrangement of chemical bonds in the structure of methyl sulfone is almost identical to that of the well-known compound binding the microtubules in cells [22]. DMSO was once considered to be a promising new anti-cancer drug, mostly because it causes induction of polymerization and stabilization of microtubules. Extensive studies have shown that DMSO has no anti-cancer properties [12]. Equisetum (horsetail) is widely found in grasslands and contains high levels of methyl sulfone, and it can be a useful compound with effective and chemotherapeutic impact for metastatic melanoma cells treatment and other possible treatments of metastatic cancers [23]. Horsetail extracts were applied to two human cancer cell lines: HeLa, HT-29, and MCF7. The results of electron spin resonance (ESR) analysis confirmed that the investigated extracts suppressed the formation of lipid peroxyl radicals in a dose-dependent manner. The results show that n-butanol, methanol, ethyl acetate, and water extracts have significant peroxyl radical scavenging activity. Additionally, the chosen extracts repressed the interphase of cells depending on specific cell line and their concentration. Ethyl acetate extract showed the largest outstanding antiproliferative effect without inducing any cell growth stimulation on human tumour cell lines. According to the results obtained, horsetail extracts could be used as a natural source of antioxidants and as potential phytochemicals [14]. The analysis emphasized that some extracts were beneficial antioxidants in comparison to the reference molecules, vitamin E and quercetin. A correlation was found between the total amount of phenolic compounds contained in the extracts and antioxidant effects. Significant effects of the extract on proliferation of melanoma B16 cells were studied and reported [15].
In other studies, phytochemicals present in grapes have also shown potential anticancer activity in preclinical and clinical studies [24,25,26]. One such phytochemical is resveratrol. Additional extracts attained from various parts of grapes have been tested for their cytotoxic effect on different cell lines: MCF-7 cells, A427 lung cancer cells, gastric adenocarcinoma CRL-1739 cells, A549 and H1299 lung cancer cells, Cal27 and SCC25 oral squamous cell carcinoma cells, and Jurkat cells. The extracts were also tested for antioxidant activity effect (UV-B induces skin carcinogenesis), anti-inflammatory effect (TNBS induces ulcerative colitis rat model), apoptosis of cells (DU145 and LNCaP), antiangiogenic (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231), and antimetastatic effects (4T1 Breast cancer cells) [27]. A correlation was also found between antioxidant effects and the total amount of phenolic compounds contained from the extracts, which results in a significant effect on the proliferation of melanoma B16 cells [15].
This study analysed the influence of antioxidant activity, proanthocyanidins and total phenols from selected natural materials (curcuma, goji berries, horsetail, rosemary, marc and seeds of grape) on the human melanoma cell line, to which these extracts have never been applied, and the literature concerning similar research is scarce. To determine the metabolic activity (the sum of the chemical reactions that take place within each cell of a living organism and that provide energy for vital processes and for synthesizing new organic material) of these cells, the WST 8 test was employed.

1.1. Curcuma (Curcuma longa)

Curcuma is a tropical plant from the ginger family; it grows under similar conditions. Short stems grow from its pear-shaped outgrowths with lateral shoots. The stalks sprout bright green, petiole-shaped petioles with prominent veins set in the shape of a fish bone. On short flower shoots, clusters of bright yellow double-someric flowers develop [28,29].
Curcuma longa has many diverse effects, for instance antioxidant [30], antimutagenic [31], antimicrobial [32], anti-inflammatory [33], anti-tumour [34], anticarcinogenic [35] wound healing, and gastroprotective activities [36]. C. longa and its active compounds (curcumin) (curcumin, 4-hydroxycinnamoyl (feruloyl) methane and bis (4-hydroxycinnamoyl) methane [37]) lessen nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and lung toxicity mainly through the reduction of inflammatory cytokines, antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects [38]. It has been reported that in healthy human subjects, daily intake decreases the amount of total blood lipid peroxides as well as in HDL (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, also called “good” cholesterol) and LDL (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, also called “bad” cholesterol)-lipid peroxidation. This reduces the risk for cardiovascular disease. The literature reviewed indicates that curcumin and related plant co-antioxidants are powerful anti-inflammatory substances [39]. Much research has been conducted on the anticancer effects of turmeric. Curcumin and turmeric extract reduce the development of animal tumours, as indicated in evaluated experiments in vitro using tissue culture methods and in vivo in mice using Dalton’s lymphoma cells [40,41]. Data also suggests that curcumin may take a role as a suppressor for Sp-1 activation and its downstream genes, including ADEM10, calmodulin, EPHB2, HDAC4, and SEPP1 in a concentration-dependent manner in colorectal cancer cell lines, and that curcumin could also act as a suppressor for Sp-1 activity in bladder cancer and decrease DNA binding activity of Sp-1 in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells [42]. The antiproliferative effects of curcumin include inhibition of several breast tumour cell lines, including hormone-dependent and -independent and multidrug-resistant (MDR) lines. Summarizing the results leads to the conclusion that curcumin is a potent antiproliferative agent for breast tumour cells and could have potential as an anticancer agent [43,44].

1.2. Goji Berry (Lycium barbarum)

Goji berry (Lycium barbarum) is a perennial, medicinal plant native to northern China. Lycium barbarum shrubs can also be found in Europe, especially in the United Kingdom, Romania and Bulgaria. It is classified as a member of the Solanaceae family, which includes potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, and aubergines. The plant grows up to 3 m tall. Most often, it is grown as a tree with hanging branches. It is a two-sex deciduous plant that blooms with small purple flowers in July. It bears fruit until the first frost and tolerates drought and cold (up to −20 °C) [45,46,47].
More than 200 different components of the Goji berry have been identified, characterized, and analysed. The most interesting for medicinal purposes are carotenoids, phenylpropanoids, flavonoids, polyphenols, and polysaccharides [48]. Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBPs) are the essential compound in the berries and are involved in various biological functions. This bioactive molecule of goji berry consists of a complex mixture of glycoconjugates, with a wide interval of molecular weights (10–2, 300 kDa), which is soluble in water (in our study we used only water) and contains a carbohydrate portion (≥90%) [48,49]. Goji berries possess properties that promote many pharmacological activities because of their polysaccharide content, including antioxidant and antiaging effects, increased metabolism, immune system regulation, neuroprotective properties, reduction of cardiovascular diseases, as well as antidiabetic, antiglaucoma anticancer, and immunomodulatory effects [45,50,51,52,53]. According to the literature, ultrasound-enhanced subcritical water is the most effective medium for extraction of polysaccharides from Lycium barbarum and it has been reported that is the most effective way to use dried goji berries. Compounds present in Lycium barbarum berries are used in cases of treating the onset and progression of cancer in traditional Chinese medicines. Many tests have confirmed pro-apoptotic and antiproliferative activity of compounds present in Lycium barbarum against cancer cells. There are reports of significant reduction of lipid peroxidation in mice under the influence of Goji polysaccharide fractions and inhibition of proliferation of liver cancer cells and anticancer properties of polysaccharide fractions. It was acknowledged with in vitro and in vivo studies that LBPs can act at different levels. Proliferation and insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells, or glucose metabolism by hepatocytes and adipocytes are also increased by LBPs [48,49,50].

1.3. Horsetail (Equisetum arvense)

Horsetail (Equisetum arvense) is an herbaceous perennial species that is spread throughout the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere. Its spines have elongated stems from which lateral shoots emerge and give the plant a spindle-like shape. They have small petiole-like leaves. The stem contains quartz, which gives the hinges firmness and brittleness. The sterile stems are 10–90 cm tall and 3–5 mm diameter [54,55].
Equisetum arvense is used in traditional medicines to cure jaundice, loss of hair and for rheumatic diseases [56]. E. arvense extracts are important in drug development with various pharmacological properties including antifungal, antioxidant, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antitumor, cytotoxic, anticonvulsant activities, and hepatoprotective activity [57,58,59,60]. There are several phytochemical compounds in horsetail, such as apigenin, luteolin, equisetumoside A, equisetumoside B and equisetumoside C, nicotine, palustrine, and palustrinine [61,62]. Some of these components are isolated from methanol extract, including two phenolic petrosins, onitin and onitin-9-O glucoside; and four flavonoids, apigenin, kaempferol-3-O-glucoside, luteolin, and quercetin-3-O-glucoside. Phytochemical analysis of the hydroalcoholic extract showed the presence of tannins, saponins, flavonoids, and sterols [63,64,65,66,67]. Several papers examining the antitumor effects of Equisetum arvense have been published, including the antitumor effects of peptide extracts on slowly growing mammary adenocarcinoma in CBRB-Rb(8.17)1Iem mice used as a model of breast cancer in humans; peptides from Hypericum perforatum and a mixture of Chelidonium majus L., Inula helenium L., Equisetum arvense L., and Inonotus obliquus exhibited high activity [68]. Other compounds (onitin, kaempferol-3-O-glucoside) exhibited hepatoprotective activities on tacrine-induced cytotoxicity in human liver-derived Hep G2 cells [67].

1.4. Marc and Seeds of Grape (Vitis vinifera)

Grape (Vitis vinifera) is a member of the Vinikov (Vitaceae (Lindley) or Ampelidae (Kunth)) family. Vitis vinifera grape species currently consist of between 5000 and 10,000 varieties. There are also some wild grapevines, Vitis vinifera ssp. sylvestris. The largest number of species is found in areas with moderate subtropical and tropical climates [69,70].
Grape (Vitis vinifera) is one of the world’s largest fruit crops. Marc and seeds of Vitis vinifera possess several medicinal effects, including antioxidant, anti-tumour, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and antidiabetic activities, as well as hepatoprotective, cardioprotective and neuroprotective effects [71,72,73,74]. Bacillus cereus, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were exposed to the extracts and tested for antibacterial activity using the pour plate method. Inhibition was successful with Gram-positive bacteria at 850–1000 ppm, and Gram-negative bacteria at 1250–1500 ppm concentration [71]. It has also been reported that grape seed extracts may be useful as antibacterial agents to prevent the deterioration of food products. A large quantity of anthocyanins are found in white grapes, including five anthocyanidin-3-monoglucosides, five anthocyanidin-3-monoglucoside-acetates, five anthocyanidin-3-monoglucoside-p-coumarates, and malvidin-3-monoglucoside-caffeoate [75]. Anticancer effects and induced apoptosis in colon cancer cell lines were noted due to exposure to extract from grape seeds. Among anticancer effect constituents, triterpenoid and betulinic acid inhibited growth by 50% (GI50) in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. The anticancer effects of resveratrol metabolites, including resveratrol-3-O-sulfate, resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide and resveratrol-4-O-glucuronide on colon cancer cells have been established, and extracts show synergistic chemotherapeutic effects with SN38 and oxaliplatin on metastatic colon cancer cells (SW620) [76,77].

1.5. Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis)

Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) is a green shrub from the leatherback family. It grows up to 2 m high. It has coniferous, leathery leaves and pale blue or white flowers [78]. Its leaves have a characteristic aromatic odor and an aromatic, slightly bitter taste, and they are used for medical purposes. The main biological activities of R. officinalis L. are antitumoral, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, neurodegenerative, endocrinal, anti-infective, and antioxidant [13,79,80].
In the European Union, rosemary extract (E392) has been approved as an effective natural antioxidant for preserved food [81]. Rosemary contains many phenolic acids and there is increasing interest in its therapeutic properties. For example, rosmarinic acid has antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties [82]. Recent studies have claimed that carnosic acid may be safe and useful as a novel chemotherapeutic agent [83,84]. Carnosic acid exhibits significant growth inhibition and cell cycle arrest in melanoma B16F10 cells, triggers cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase, and enhances p21 expression, and it can enhance BCNU- and CCNU-mediated cytotoxicity and cell cycle arrest in B16F10 cells. It also inhibits tumour growth and reduces the values of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in vivo [83]. Other studies show that it targets colon cancer cells by increasing intracellular reactive oxygen species and decreasing cell survival mechanisms; it may provide a therapeutic option in colon cancer through joining rosemary compounds with chemotherapeutic drugs [85,86].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

This study investigated the following natural materials: Curcuma (Curcuma longa), Goji Berry (Lycium barbarum), Horsetail (Equisetum arvense), Marc and Seeds of Grape (Vitis vinifera), and Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis). The material was obtained from Alfred Galke GmbH (Samtgemeinde Bad Grund, Germany), except the marc and grape seeds, which were obtained from domestic producers. Marc and grape seeds of the Traminec species were dried by lyophilization. Other materials were received in the dried form from the supplier; the water content was 10 wt. The material was ground in a grinder before use. The extracts obtained were stored in a freezer at −20 °C. After the extract was obtained, all analyses were performed within 3 weeks.
For extractions, we used water as a solvent because water is present as a solvent in everyday tasks such as cooking. It also acts as a solvent in our bodies, as all biochemical reactions take place in aqueous solutions. Water is at the same time a medium for the transport of nutrients and oxygen to cells and for the removal of metabolic waste. In industries, such as the food industry, water is commonly used as a solvent.

2.2. Determining Optimal Extraction Conditions

Conventional extraction methods were used. After grinding, the naturally dried material was macerated in hot water. Extraction experiments were performed at different temperatures and for different extraction times. Optimal conditions to achieve the highest antioxidant activity were determined with Design Expert Pro 7.0 software, Godward St NE, Minneapolis, 2007 (concentration of the resulting solution was c = 5 mg/mL). The antioxidative activity of the natural material solution was determined by following the exact sequence of the experiments as suggested by the Expert pro 7.0 design program. The experiment was performed at a temperature range from 40 °C to 100 °C and a time range from 5 min to 30 min. For the extract of curcuma and rosemary, the program determined the optimum temperature and time but confirmed that time does not have a significant effect in this time range, while temperature has a visible effect. In the cases of horsetail extract and goji berry extract, both parameters had significant effects. The measurements of the grape extract, according to the program, showed that the temperature and time were significant, but the measured numbers were very similar. Temperatures varied by 5 °C. However, the times varied by 4 min. In cases where time had no significant effect, it was selected at the point where the highest antioxidant activity was achieved.

2.3. Preparation of the Extract

Natural material solutions prepared under optimal conditions were filtered and the raffinate was discarded. Prefiltered natural material solution was lyophilized. After lyophilization, dry extracts were obtained. Before the extracts were applied to the cancer cells, various concentrations of the solutions of the extracts were prepared. Eight solutions of extracts at different concentrations were prepared (water was used as a solvent): c = 100 mg/mL, 20 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, 0.01 mg/mL, 0.001 mg/mL.

2.4. Testing of the Cells’ Metabolic Activity

Human melanoma cell line WM-266-4 (ATCC® CRL1676™, USA) was cultured in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM, ATCC® 30-2003™) containing 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS, ATCC® 30-2021™) and 0.02% MycoZap™ Plus-CL (Lonza, Portsmouth, NH, USA). Cells were cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2, ≥90% RH. The cells were plated at a density of 2 × 104 viable cells per well in 96-well culture plates. The cells were cultured in complete medium for 24 h to allow cell attachment. In order to measure the cells’ metabolic activity, the cells were exposed to selected concentrations of extracts and cultured for 24 h. Concentrations of extracts were 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 100 mg/mL. Cells for controls were cultured for 24 h in the complete medium only, no extracts added. The WST 8 Colorimetric Cell Viability Kit I (PromoKine, PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany, EU) was used, according the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance (A) was measured spectrophotometrically at 570 nm (background absorbance at 630 nm) in pentaplicates for all samples. The percentage of the cells’ metabolic activity was calculated with the following equation: (A570-A630) test sample value/(A570-A630) control value × 100, where A represents average value calculated from pentaplicates.
In addition, cell morphology was observed with an inverted microscope (DM16000B, Leica) using a digital camera (DFC365 FX Leica, Buffalo Grove IL, USA).

2.5. DPPH Method for the Determination of Antioxidantity

Antioxidant activity was determined according to the DPPH, method as described by Villaño et al. [87]

2.6. Method for the Determination of Total Phenolics

Total phenolics were determined according to the Folin–Ciocalteu, method as described by Gülçin et al. [88].

2.7. Method for the Determination of Proanthocyanidins

Proanthocyanidins were determined using the UV spectrophotometric method (UV-VIS spectrophotometer, BIOTEK SYNEGRY 2) as described by Majhenič et al. [89].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Determining Optimal Extraction Conditions

Measurements provided the optimal conditions for achieving the highest antioxidative activity of a single material as shown in Table 1. The antioxidative activity is presented in Figure 1d. Table 1 shows optimal extraction temperatures for all materials at a temperature range from 90 °C to 100 °C, according to the experimental design in the temperature range from 40 °C to 100 °C and the time range from 5 min to 30 min. The extraction times are about 15 min, with a slightly lower optimal extraction time in the case of Horsetail extract, according to the program. A high percentage of inhibitory effectiveness (89%) in rosemary was measured (Figure 1d).
Much research has already been done on rosemary, and it has been shown to contain many antioxidants, such as carnosol, rosmanol, carnosic acid, and methyl carnosate [90]. Eighty-seven perecent inhibitory effectiveness was determined for turmeric, which is assumed to be a component of curcumin. Similar results have been reported in the literature, with most being achieved with added ethanol on extraction; for example, about 70% of the antioxidant activity was achieved on extraction with 50% ethanol at 60 °C and a time of 60 min [91]. High values were obtained with the use of a juice extractor, with antioxidant activity of curcume measured around 65% [92]. Grape extract achieved 84% inhibition, probably because of the high content of proanthocyanidins. The inhibitory value of horsetail extract was measured at 79%. It has been reported that horsetail extracts show high superoxide anion radical-scavenging activities [93]. Goji berries had the lowest inhibitory value, but still above 50%. In the future, it would be interesting to compare the maceration results obtained with supercritical extraction using a co-solvent (water), because supercritical water extraction has been shown to achieve high antioxidant activities. A concentration of 11.3 µg/mL has been measured, corresponding to high antioxidant activities. It has also been found that at lower temperatures (25 °C), the main constituent of the extract is a more polar compound (rosmanol). By increasing the temperature to 200 °C, carnosic acid, carnosol, genquaninin, and carnosic acid have been extracted at 200 °C [90]. Studies show the key impact of different extraction methods on purity, molecular characteristics and biological properties, even in the case of extracted alginates [94]. For example, curcumin-laden alginate—80 nanoparticle polysorbate may be useful in treating various human inflammatory diseases [95].

3.2. Results of Determination of Total Phenols, Proanthocyanidins and Antioxidantive Activity

The concentrations required for 50% inhibition efficiency are shown in Figure 1c. All the extracts achieved high values of inhibitory effectiveness. The visible difference, however, is the amount of extract concentration required to achieve 50% inhibitory potency. For example, curcuma has high percentages of antioxidant activity and low concentration (EC50 = 0.708 mg/mL) is required to achieve 50% inhibitory potency. The figures are similar for grapes (EC50 = 0.681 mg/mL). According to the literature, to obtain 50% antioxidant activity of curcuma extract, prepared by continuous magnetic stirring in methanol at 25 °C from different types and varieties of turmeric, the required concentrations of extract were measured from 0.03 to 0.23 mg/mL, which comes close to the results of this study [96]. However, rosemary (EC50 = 2.199 mg/mL), horsetail (EC50 = 3.384 mg/mL), and goji berries (EC50 = 3.604 mg/mL) require a slightly higher concentration. The contents of the proanthocyanidins in mg per gram of material selected (mPAC/g material) are shown in Figure 1b, and the total phenol content in mg per gram of the selected material (mg GA/g material) is shown in Figure 1a. The values of proanthocyanidins and total phenols (mg/g material) are higher in cases of higher levels of antioxidant activity. With aqueous extracts of turmeric, methanolic extracts are also approximated in the measurements of total phenols: Methanolic extracts have reached a total phenol content of 43 to 158 mg GA/g extract [96]. Also, a study with ethanol extract confirmed our results on high levels of proanthocyanidins, a type of flavonoid known for its high antioxidant properties. They measured about 1.38 g/L [97].

3.3. The Effects of the Extracts on Cells’ Metabolic Activity

Morphological changes of WM-266-4 cells exposed to different concentrations of tested extracts and the control are shown in Figure 2. The effects of the tested extracts on the metabolic activity of WM-266-4 cells are shown in Figure 3.

3.4. Statistical Analysis of the Extracts on Cell Metabolic Activity

To measure metabolic activity, five repetitions were performed at 100, 20, 10, 5, 1, 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 mg/mL concentrations using five different extracts: curcuma, goji berry, grape marc and seeds, horsetail, and rosemary. The effect of each extract on the metabolic activity of cells was determined by comparison with the control. No test compound was exposed to cell control. In the control, the cells were exposed only to the medium. Each set of measurements was tested for possible outliers using Dixon’s and Grubbs’s statistical tests [98] and in cases where they were present, they were discarded. Average metabolic activities and corresponding standard deviations at different concentrations of extracts are presented in Figure 3. The change in significance in metabolic activity was accessed using a statistical t-test by comparing two sample means at 95% confidence. This test considers the average values at certain concentrations and its standard deviations. The calculated t-value (tcalc) is compared with the critical t-values (tcrit) and if tcalc > tcrit, the change in average value was considered as significant. The change in bar colors in Figure 3 represents the transition of significant influence on the metabolic activity with the change in concentration. Similar bar color represents an insignificant influence on metabolic activity with change in concentration. Furthermore, in cases where the same metabolic activity was predicted statistically (using the t-test) for more than two samples, non-significant change between these samples was also confirmed by the analysis-of-variances (ANOVA) at 95% confidence. Curcuma extract shows two concentration regions where metabolic activity drops significantly (Figure 3a). The first concentration region is at 0.001–1 mg/mL (MA ≈ 50%), the second at 5–100 mg/mL (MA ≈ 20%). Goji berry extract has the lowest influence on metabolic activity: an insignificant influence of goji berry extract occurred at up to 20 mg/mL (Figure 3b), but a 100 mg/mL concentration had an influence (MA ≈ 20%). In the case of grape marc and seeds extract, a significant influence on metabolic activity occurs at 0.001–5 mg/mL (MA ≈ 70%) (Figure 3c), followed by a second significant drop at 10 mg/mL (MA ≈ 50%). Grape marc and seed extract had the most significant influence at 20–100 mg/mL concentration (MA ≈ 50%). Horsetail extract showed a significant change in metabolic activity even at the lowest concentration present, 0.001 mg/mL (Figure 3d). However, with an increase in the concentration of horsetail extract up to 20 mg/mL, its influence is statistically insignificant. Increasing the concentration from 20 to 100 mg/mL changed metabolic activity significantly again (MA ≈ 20%). Rosemary extract has a different influence on metabolic activity compared with horsetail extract (Figure 3e). In the range of 0.001–1 mg/mL, the effect is similar; it drops at 5 mg/mL, and again drops at 10–20 mg/mL (MA ≈ 20%). The latter concentration has the most significant effect on metabolic activity. Surprisingly, an increase in rosemary concentration to 100 mg/mL increases metabolic activity.

4. Conclusions

One of the goals of the food industry is to use as few organic solvents as possible. Therefore, our study was limited to water as a solvent. With Design Expert pro 11, optimal parameters for extraction performance were determined to achieve the highest percentage of antioxidant activity. The concentration of extracts required to achieve 50% inhibitory effectiveness, total phenols, and proanthocyanidins was determined.
Furthermore, a study of the influence of extracts on WM-266-4 melanoma cells was performed. A high percentage of antioxidant activity AA (c = 5 mg/mL) = 87% was measured in the curcuma extract and a low concentration (EC50 = 0.708 mg/mL) was required to achieve 50% inhibition. Multiple studies have shown that curcuma is a potent antioxidant source that combats free radicals in the body and has significant potential to act as an antitumor agent. Within the frame of our research, we observed that extract of turmeric significantly influences metabolic activity at the lowest extract concentration of 0.001 mg/mL. Curcuma extract shows two concentration ranges where metabolic activity is significantly reduced: at about 50% MA and 20%.
Goji berry extract has the lowest influence on metabolic activity. The highest concentration (100 mg/mL) of goji berry extract had an influence on metabolic activity (MA = 25%). However, there was no significant change with other concentrations. Grape marc and seed exhibited 84% antioxidant activity. The percentage of total phenols is higher than 50%.
When cell metabolic activity is concerned, compared to the control, it was observed that the extracts inhibited the metabolic activity of the tested cells at all concentrations. Therefore, they reduced or decreased the metabolic activity of cancer cells. Grape marc and seed extract at 20–100 mg/mL concentration have the most significant influence on metabolic activity.
The results showed that horsetail extract causes significant change in metabolic activity even for the lowest concentration present, 0.001 mg/mL. It is assumed that the reason for this is the high content of antioxidants AA (c = 5 mg/mL) = 79% and total phenols GA = 33.49 mg/g in the horsetail extract. Rosemary extract has a similar influence on metabolic activity compared to horsetail extract, because even for the lowest concentration present (0.001 mg/mL), significant inhibition of metabolic activity of the tested cells was noted. The cause of the high metabolic activity of WM-266-4 cells is probably high levels of antioxidants AA (c = 5 mg/mL) = 89% and total GA phenols = 90.10 mg/g extract, as antioxidants and phenols have a beneficial effect or prevent oxidative stress of the cells.
The optimal process conditions for the preparation of extracts from selected natural materials (Curcuma, Goji Berry, Grape marc and seeds, Horsetail and Rosemary) were determined. The obtained extracts decreased the rate of melanoma cell division (WM-266-4). Further, it would be interesting to check in more detail whether the division only stopped or even apoptosis of these melanoma cells may have occurred. We plan to expand the research to at least three other melanoma cell lines to test anti-tumour effects. It would also be interesting to check the content of the potential bioactive compounds in the discharged fractions, since agricultural residues have already been shown to have the potential for an abundant source of natural antioxidants suitable for further development [99]. Furthermore, it would be necessary to check what is the influence of the extracts on the healthy cells. Therefore, this should be a point for further investigation.

Author Contributions

T.Ž. and B.D. performed most of the experimental work, D.B. performed an extensive literature search and data evaluation together with M.F. T.Ž. and M.K.H. wrote most of the paper; M.K.H. and Ž.K. devised the content of the review and supervised the writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency through grant P2-0046 is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.; Naishadham, D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2013, 63, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Padma, V.V. An overview of targeted cancer therapy. BioMedicine 2015, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Drug-Resistance in Human Melanoma—Helmbach—2001—International Journal of Cancer—Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijc.1378 (accessed on 14 May 2019).
  4. Pan, L.; Chai, H.; Kinghorn, A.D. The continuing search for antitumor agents from higher plants. Phytochem. Lett. 2010, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Bindseil, K.U.; Jakupovic, J.; Wolf, D.; Lavayre, J.; Leboul, J.; van der Pyl, D. Pure compound libraries; a new perspective for natural product based drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 2001, 6, 840–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khojasteh, A.; Metón, I.; Camino, S.; Cusido, R.M.; Eibl, R.; Palazon, J. In Vitro Study of the Anticancer Effects of Biotechnological Extracts of the Endangered Plant Species Satureja Khuzistanica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Bonassi, S.; Prinzi, G.; Lamonaca, P.; Russo, P.; Paximadas, I.; Rasoni, G.; Rossi, R.; Ruggi, M.; Malandrino, S.; Sánchez-Flores, M.; et al. Clinical and genomic safety of treatment with Ginkgo biloba L. leaf extract (IDN 5933/Ginkgoselect®Plus) in elderly: A randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial [GiBiEx]. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Jabbari, M.; Daneshfard, B.; Emtiazy, M.; Khiveh, A.; Hashempur, M.H. Biological Effects and Clinical Applications of Dwarf Elder (Sambucus ebulus L): A Review. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 22, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Abate, A.; Rossini, E.; Bonini, S.A.; Fragni, M.; Cosentini, D.; Tiberio, G.A.M.; Benetti, D.; Hantel, C.; Laganà, M.; Grisanti, S.; et al. Cytotoxic Effect of Trabectedin In Human Adrenocortical Carcinoma Cell Lines and Primary Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Siamayuwa, C.E.; Nyanga, L.K.; Chidewe, C. Chemopreventive Effects and Antioxidant Capacity of Combined Leaf Extracts of Sesamum angustifolium (Oliv.) Engl. and Hibiscus articulatus on Rhabdomyosarcoma. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2020, 2020, 8567182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Vo, N.N.Q.; Nomura, Y.; Muranaka, T.; Fukushima, E.O. Structure-Activity Relationships of Pentacyclic Triterpenoids as Inhibitors of Cyclooxygenase and Lipoxygenase Enzymes. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 3311–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ravi, A.; Mallika, A.; Sama, V.; Begum, A.S.; Khan, R.S.; Reddy, B.M. Antiproliferative activity and standardization of Tecomella undulata bark extract on K562 cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 137, 1353–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tai, J.; Cheung, S.; Wu, M.; Hasman, D. Antiproliferation effect of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) on human ovarian cancer cells in vitro. Phytomedicine 2012, 19, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Četojević-Simin, D.D.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J.M.; Bogdanović, G.M.; Djilas, S.M.; Ćetković, G.S.; Tumbas, V.T.; Stojiljković, B.T. Antioxidative and Antiproliferative Activities of Different Horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) Extracts. J. Med. Food 2010, 13, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Trouillas, P.; Calliste, C.-A.; Allais, D.-P.; Simon, A.; Marfak, A.; Delage, C.; Duroux, J.-L. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative properties of sixteen water plant extracts used in the Limousin countryside as herbal teas. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mackenzie, G.G.; Queisser, N.; Wolfson, M.L.; Fraga, C.G.; Adamo, A.M.; Oteiza, P.I. Curcumin induces cell-arrest and apoptosis in association with the inhibition of constitutively active NF-κB and STAT3 pathways in Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 123, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, W.-Y.; Cai, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Y. Natural Phenolic Compounds From Medicinal Herbs and Dietary Plants: Potential Use for Cancer Prevention. Nutr. Cancer 2009, 62, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Prakash, D.; Kumar, N. Cost Effective Natural Antioxidants. In Nutrients, Dietary Supplements, and Nutriceuticals: Cost Analysis Versus Clinical Benefits; Gerald, J.K., Watson, R.R., Preedy, V.R., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 163–187. ISBN 978-1-60761-308-4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Valdés, A.; García-Cañas, V.; Rocamora-Reverte, L.; Gómez-Martínez, Á.; Ferragut, J.A.; Cifuentes, A. Effect of rosemary polyphenols on human colon cancer cells: Transcriptomic profiling and functional enrichment analysis. Genes Nutr. 2013, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yesil-Celiktas, O.; Sevimli, C.; Bedir, E.; Vardar-Sukan, F. Inhibitory Effects of Rosemary Extracts, Carnosic Acid and Rosmarinic Acid on the Growth of Various Human Cancer Cell Lines. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2010, 65, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.P.; Li, Y.Q.; Lv, Y.T.; Wang, J.M. Effect of curcumin on the proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion of human melanoma A375 cells. Genet. Mol. Res. GMR 2015, 14, 1056–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Caron, J.M.; Bannon, M.; Rosshirt, L.; Luis, J.; Monteagudo, L.; Caron, J.M.; Sternstein, G.M. Methyl Sulfone Induces Loss of Metastatic Properties and Reemergence of Normal Phenotypes in a Metastatic Cloudman S-91 (M3) Murine Melanoma Cell Line. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mao, F.; Xiao, B.; Jiang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Huang, X.; Guo, J. Anticancer effect of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on colon cancer cells involves G0/G1 phase arrest. Med. Oncol. 2011, 28, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kaur, M.; Agarwal, R.; Agarwal, C. Grape seed extract induces anoikis and caspase-mediated apoptosis in human prostate carcinoma LNCaP cells: Possible role of ataxia telangiectasia mutated–p53 activation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mantena, S.K.; Baliga, M.S.; Katiyar, S.K. Grape seed proanthocyanidins induce apoptosis and inhibit metastasis of highly metastatic breast carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 1682–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ye, X.; Krohn, R.L.; Liu, W.; Joshi, S.S.; Kuszynski, C.A.; McGinn, T.R.; Bagchi, M.; Preuss, H.G.; Stohs, S.J.; Bagchi, D. The cytotoxic effects of a novel IH636 grape seed proanthocyanidin extract on cultured human cancer cells. In Stress Adaptation, Prophylaxis and Treatment; Das, D.K., Ed.; Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 1999; pp. 99–108. ISBN 978-1-4615-5097-6. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaur, M.; Agarwal, C.; Agarwal, R. Anticancer and Cancer Chemopreventive Potential of Grape Seed Extract and Other Grape-Based Products. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 1806S–1812S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ammon, H.P.T.; Wahl, M.A. Pharmacology of Curcuma longa. Planta Med. 1991, 57, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Priyadarsini, K.I. The chemistry of curcumin: From extraction to therapeutic agent. Mol. Basel Switz. 2014, 19, 20091–20112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ak, T.; Gülçin, İ. Antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of curcumin. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2008, 174, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shukla, Y.; Arora, A.; Taneja, P. Antimutagenic potential of curcumin on chromosomal aberrations in Wistar rats. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2002, 515, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gupta, A.; Mahajan, S.; Sharma, R. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Curcuma longa rhizome extract against Staphylococcus aureus. Biotechnol. Rep. 2015, 6, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sahebkar, A. Curcumin: A Natural Multitarget Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2016, 15, 333–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ruby, A.J.; Kuttan, G.; Dinesh Babu, K.; Rajasekharan, K.N.; Kuttan, R. Anti-tumour and antioxidant activity of natural curcuminoids. Cancer Lett. 1995, 94, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Garg, R.; Ingle, A.; Maru, G. Dietary turmeric modulates DMBA-induced p21ras, MAP kinases and AP-1/NF-κB pathway to alter cellular responses during hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 232, 428–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Azuine, M.A.; Bhide, S.V. Protective single/combined treatment with betel leaf and turmeric against methyl (acetoxymethyl) nitrosamine-induced hamster oral carcinogenesis. Int. J. Cancer 1992, 51, 412–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Toda, S.; Miyase, T.; Arichi, E.; Tanizawa, H.; Takino, Y. Natural Antioxidants. III. Antioxidative Components Isolated from Rhizome of Curcuma longa L. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 1985, 33, 1725–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Panahi, Y.; Hosseini, M.S.; Khalili, N.; Naimi, E.; Majeed, M.; Sahebkar, A. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of curcuminoid-piperine combination in subjects with metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial and an updated meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 34, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miquel, J.; Bernd, A.; Sempere, J.M.; Díaz-Alperi, J.; Ramírez, A. The curcuma antioxidants: Pharmacological effects and prospects for future clinical use. A review. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2002, 34, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lu, P.; Tong, Q.; Jiang, F.; Zheng, L.; Chen, F.; Zeng, F.; Dong, J.; Du, Y. Preparation of curcumin prodrugs and their in vitro anti-tumor activities. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci. Hua Zhong Ke Ji Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ying Wen Ban Huazhong Keji Daxue Xuebao Yixue Yingdewen Ban 2005, 25, 668–670, 678. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kanase, V.; Khan, F. An Overview of Medicinal Value of Curcuma Species. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018, 11, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lou, Z.; O’Reilly, S.; Liang, H.; Maher, V.M.; Sleight, S.D.; McCormick, J.J. Down-regulation of overexpressed sp1 protein in human fibrosarcoma cell lines inhibits tumor formation. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehta, K.; Pantazis, P.; McQueen, T.; Aggarwal, B.B. Antiproliferative effect of curcumin (diferuloylmethane) against human breast tumor cell lines. Anticancer. Drugs 1997, 8, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kuttan, R.; Bhanumathy, P.; Nirmala, K.; George, M.C. Potential anticancer activity of turmeric (Curcuma longa). Cancer Lett. 1985, 29, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Donno, D.; Beccaro, G.L.; Mellano, M.G.; Cerutti, A.K.; Bounous, G. Goji berry fruit (Lycium spp.): Antioxidant compound fingerprint and bioactivity evaluation. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 1070–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Skenderidis, P.; Petrotos, K.; Giavasis, I.; Hadjichristodoulou, C.; Tsakalof, A. Optimization of ultrasound assisted extraction of of goji berry (Lycium barbarum) fruits and evaluation of extracts’ bioactivity. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, e12522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fukuda, T.; Yokoyama, J.; Ohashi, H. Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Genus Lycium (Solanaceae): Inferences from Chloroplast DNA Sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001, 19, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tian, X.; Liang, T.; Liu, Y.; Ding, G.; Zhang, F.; Ma, Z. Extraction, Structural Characterization, and Biological Functions of Lycium Barbarum Polysaccharides: A Review. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Masci, A.; Carradori, S.; Casadei, M.A.; Paolicelli, P.; Petralito, S.; Ragno, R.; Cesa, S. Lycium barbarum polysaccharides: Extraction, purification, structural characterisation and evidence about hypoglycaemic and hypolipidaemic effects. A review. Food Chem. 2018, 254, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kulczyński, B.; Gramza-Michałowska, A. Goji Berry (Lycium barbarum): Composition and Health Effects—A Review. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2016, 66, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gan, L.; Hua Zhang, S.; Liang Yang, X.; Bi Xu, H. Immunomodulation and antitumor activity by a polysaccharide–protein complex from Lycium barbarum. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2004, 4, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jing, L.; Cui, G.; Feng, Q.; Xiao, Y. Evaluation of Hypoglycemic Activity of the Polysaccharides Extracted from Lycium Barbarum. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2009, 6, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Li, X.M.; Ma, Y.L.; Liu, X.J. Effect of the Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on age-related oxidative stress in aged mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Marshall, G. Growth and Development of Field Horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.). Weed Sci. 1986, 34, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Radulović, N.; Stojanović, G.; Palić, R. Composition and antimicrobial activity of Equisetum arvense L. essential oil. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maeda, H.; Miyamoto, K.; Sano, T. Occurrence of Dermatitis in Rats Fed a Cholesterol Diet Containing Field Horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.). J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 1997, 43, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jabeur, I.; Martins, N.; Barros, L.; Calhelha, R.C.; Vaz, J.; Achour, L.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Contribution of the phenolic composition to the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antitumor potential of Equisetum giganteum L. and Tilia platyphyllos Scop. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 975–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Jiang, F.; Li, W.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Jin, B.; Chen, N.; Ding, Z.; Ding, X. Antioxidant, Antityrosinase and Antitumor Activity Comparison: The Potential Utilization of Fibrous Root Part of Bletilla striata (Thunb.) Reichb.f. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Čanadanović-Brunet, J.M.; Ćetković, G.S.; Djilas, S.M.; Tumbas, V.T.; Savatović, S.S.; Mandić, A.I.; Markov, S.L.; Cvetković, D.D. Radical scavenging and antimicrobial activity of horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) extracts. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Garcia, D.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V.; Marín, S. Effect of Equisetum arvense and Stevia rebaudiana extracts on growth and mycotoxin production by Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides in maize seeds as affected by water activity. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 153, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Asgarpanah, J.; Roohi, E. Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Properties of Equisetum Arvense L. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 3689–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Vogl, S.; Picker, P.; Mihaly-Bison, J.; Fakhrudin, N.; Atanasov, A.G.; Heiss, E.H.; Wawrosch, C.; Reznicek, G.; Dirsch, V.M.; Saukel, J.; et al. Ethnopharmacological in vitro studies on Austria’s folk medicine—An unexplored lore in vitro anti-inflammatory activities of 71 Austrian traditional herbal drugs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 149, 750–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Review on Plants Having Hepatoprotective Activity. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260167853_Review_on_plants_having_Hepatoprotective_activity (accessed on 11 November 2019).
  64. Sham, T.-T.; Chan, C.-O.; Wang, Y.-H.; Yang, J.-M.; Mok, D.K.-W.; Chan, S.-W. A review on the traditional Chinese medicinal herbs and formulae with hypolipidemic effect. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 925302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Capasso, F.; Cerri, R.; Morrica, P.; Senatore, F. Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory activity of an alcoholic extract of Teucrium polium L. Boll. Della Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1983, 59, 1639–1643. [Google Scholar]
  66. Santos, A.R.; Niero, R.; Filho, V.C.; Yunes, R.A.; Pizzolatti, M.G.; Delle Monache, F.; Calixto, J.B. Antinociceptive properties of steroids isolated from Phyllanthus corcovadensis in mice. Planta Med. 1995, 61, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Oh, H.; Kim, D.-H.; Cho, J.-H.; Kim, Y.-C. Hepatoprotective and free radical scavenging activities of phenolic petrosins and flavonoids isolated from Equisetum arvense. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 95, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tepkeeva, I.I.; Moiseeva, E.V.; Chaadaeva, A.V.; Zhavoronkova, E.V.; Kessler, Y.V.; Semushina, S.G.; Demushkin, V.P. Evaluation of antitumor activity of peptide extracts from medicinal plants on the model of transplanted breast cancer in CBRB-Rb(8.17)1Iem mice. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 145, 464–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Prirodoslovno Društvo Slovenije. Available online: https://www.proteus.si/ (accessed on 19 November 2019).
  70. Aizpurua-Olaizola, O.; Ormazabal, M.; Vallejo, A.; Olivares, M.; Navarro, P.; Etxebarria, N.; Usobiaga, A. Optimization of Supercritical Fluid Consecutive Extractions of Fatty Acids and Polyphenols from Vitis Vinifera Grape Wastes. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, E101–E107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Selvi, T.; Sakariah, K.K. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of grape (Vitis vinifera) seed extracts. Food Res. Int. 2003, 36, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Baydar, N.G.; Sagdic, O.; Ozkan, G.; Cetin, S. Determination of antibacterial effects and total phenolic contents of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) seed extracts. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 41, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Orhan, N.; Aslan, M.; Orhan, D.D.; Ergun, F.; Yeşilada, E. In-vivo assessment of antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of grapevine leaves (Vitis vinifera) in diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 108, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nassiri-Asl, M.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Review of the pharmacological effects of Vitis vinifera (Grape) and its bioactive compounds. Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 1197–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Baydar, N.G.; Özkan, G.; Sağdiç, O. Total phenolic contents and antibacterial activities of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) extracts. Food Control 2004, 15, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Singh, R.P.; Sakariah, K.K. Antioxidant activity of grape seed (Vitis vinifera) extracts on peroxidation models in vitro. Food Chem. 2001, 73, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wulf, L.W.; Nagel, C.W. High-Pressure Liquid Chromatographic Separation of Anthocyanins of Vitis Vinifera. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1978, 29, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
  78. Akhtar, M.S.; Habib, A.; Ali, A.; Bashir, S. Isolation, identification, and in vivoevaluation of flavonoid fractions of chloroform/methanol extracts of Rheum emodi roots for their hepatoprotective activity in Wistar rats. Int. J. Nutr. Pharmacol. Neurol. Dis. 2016, 6, 28. [Google Scholar]
  79. Andrade, J.M.; Faustino, C.; Garcia, C.; Ladeiras, D.; Reis, C.P.; Rijo, P. Rosmarinus officinalis L.: An update review of its phytochemistry and biological activity. Future Sci. OA 2018, 4, FSO283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Đilas, S.; Knez, Ž.; Četojević-Simin, D.; Tumbas, V.; Škerget, M.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J.; Ćetković, G. In vitro antioxidant and antiproliferative activity of three rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) extract formulations. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 2052–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Approved Additives and E Numbers. Available online: http://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/approved-additives-and-e-numbers (accessed on 12 November 2019).
  82. Erkan, N.; Ayranci, G.; Ayranci, E. Antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus Officinalis L.) extract, blackseed (Nigella sativa L.) essential oil, carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid and sesamol. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lin, K.-I.; Lin, C.-C.; Kuo, S.-M.; Lai, J.-C.; Wang, Y.-Q.; You, H.-L.; Hsu, M.-L.; Chen, C.-H.; Shiu, L.-Y. Carnosic acid impedes cell growth and enhances anticancer effects of carmustine and lomustine in melanoma. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Moore, J.; Yousef, M.; Tsiani, E. Anticancer Effects of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) Extract and Rosemary Extract Polyphenols. Nutrients 2016, 8, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pérez-Sánchez, A.; Barrajón-Catalán, E.; Ruiz-Torres, V.; Agulló-Chazarra, L.; Herranz-López, M.; Valdés, A.; Cifuentes, A.; Micol, V. Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) extract causes ROS-induced necrotic cell death and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. HemaIswarya, S.; Doble, M. Potential synergism of natural products in the treatment of cancer. Phytother. Res. PTR 2006, 20, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Villaño, D.; Fernández-Pachón, M.S.; Moyá, M.L.; Troncoso, A.M.; García-Parrilla, M.C. Radical scavenging ability of polyphenolic compounds towards DPPH free radical. Talanta 2007, 71, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gülçin, Ì.; Güngör Şat, İ.; Beydemir, Ş.; Elmastaş, M.; İrfan Küfrevioǧlu, Ö. Comparison of antioxidant activity of clove (Eugenia caryophylata Thunb) buds and lavender (Lavandula stoechas L.). Food Chem. 2004, 87, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Majhenič, L.; Škerget, M.; Knez, Ž. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of guarana seed extracts. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1258–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ibañez, E.; Kubátová, A.; Señoráns, F.J.; Cavero, S.; Reglero, G.; Hawthorne, S.B. Subcritical Water Extraction of Antioxidant Compounds from Rosemary Plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mushtaq, Z.; Nadeem, M.T.; Arshad, M.U.; Saeed, F.; Ahmed, M.H.; Ain, H.B.U.; Javed, A.; Anjum, F.M.; Hussain, S. Exploring the biochemical and antioxidant potential of ginger (Adric) and turmeric (Haldi). Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 1642–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Maizura, M.; Abdullah, A.; Mustapha, W.A.W. Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Kesum (Polygonum Minus), Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) and Turmeric (Curcuma Longa) Extract. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Total-phenolic-content-and-antioxidant-activity-of-Maizura-Abdullah/6404359355e2bd79adef30117ced598a2d01d87f (accessed on 18 April 2020).
  93. Nagai, T.; Myoda, T.; Nagashima, T. Antioxidative activities of water extract and ethanol extract from field horsetail (tsukushi) Equisetum arvense L. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Borazjani, N.J.; Tabarsa, M.; You, S.; Rezaei, M. Effects of extraction methods on molecular characteristics, antioxidant properties and immunomodulation of alginates from Sargassum angustifolium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 101, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Govindaraju, R.; Karki, R.; Chandrashekarappa, J.; Santhanam, M.; Shankar, A.K.K.; Joshi, H.K.; Divakar, G. Enhanced Water Dispersibility of Curcumin Encapsulated in Alginate-Polysorbate 80 Nano Particles and Bioavailability in Healthy Human Volunteers. Pharm. Nanotechnol. 2019, 7, 39–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Akter, J.; Hossain, M.A.; Takara, K.; Islam, M.d.Z.; Hou, D.-X. Antioxidant activity of different species and varieties of turmeric (Curcuma spp): Isolation of active compounds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 215, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Negro, C.; Tommasi, L.; Miceli, A. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity from red grape marc extracts. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Massart, D.L.; Vandeginste, B.G.M.; Buydens, L.M.C.; de Jong, S.; Lewi, P.J.; Smeyers-Verbeke, J.; Mann, C.K. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A. Appl. Spectrosc. 1998, 52, 302A. [Google Scholar]
  99. Vijayalaxmi, S.; Jayalakshmi, S.K.; Sreeramulu, K. Polyphenols from different agricultural residues: Extraction, identification and their antioxidant properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 2761–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Applsci 10 03499 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Total phenolic content in selected extracts. (b) Proanthocyanidin content in selected extracts. (c) Concentrations of extracts required for 50% inhibitory effectiveness. (d) Antioxidant activity in selected extracts under optimal conditions. The extracts were obtained by maceration with water at optimum temperature and time: Curcuma (100 °C, 15 min), Goji berry (93 °C, 13 min), Grape marc and seeds (100 °C, 15 min), Horsetail (100 °C, 6 min), and Rosemary (96 °C, 20 min).
Figure 1. (a) Total phenolic content in selected extracts. (b) Proanthocyanidin content in selected extracts. (c) Concentrations of extracts required for 50% inhibitory effectiveness. (d) Antioxidant activity in selected extracts under optimal conditions. The extracts were obtained by maceration with water at optimum temperature and time: Curcuma (100 °C, 15 min), Goji berry (93 °C, 13 min), Grape marc and seeds (100 °C, 15 min), Horsetail (100 °C, 6 min), and Rosemary (96 °C, 20 min).
Applsci 10 03499 g001
Applsci 10 03499 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphology of WM-266-4 cells when exposed to: (a) medium (control); (b) extract of curcuma (5 mg/mL); (c) extract of goji berry (100 mg/mL); (d) extract of horsetail (100 mg/mL); (e) extract of grape merc and seeds (20 mg/mL); (f) extract of rosemary (5 mg/mL). Magnification 200×.
Figure 2. Morphology of WM-266-4 cells when exposed to: (a) medium (control); (b) extract of curcuma (5 mg/mL); (c) extract of goji berry (100 mg/mL); (d) extract of horsetail (100 mg/mL); (e) extract of grape merc and seeds (20 mg/mL); (f) extract of rosemary (5 mg/mL). Magnification 200×.
Applsci 10 03499 g002
Applsci 10 03499 g003 550
Figure 3. Metabolic activity (decrease in cancer cell activity) at different concentrations of (a) curcuma, (b) goji berry, (c) grape marc and seed, (d) horsetail, and (e) rosemary.
Figure 3. Metabolic activity (decrease in cancer cell activity) at different concentrations of (a) curcuma, (b) goji berry, (c) grape marc and seed, (d) horsetail, and (e) rosemary.
Applsci 10 03499 g003
Table
Table 1. Optimal conditions for the highest antioxidative activity.
Table 1. Optimal conditions for the highest antioxidative activity.
MaterialTextraction [°C]textraction [min]
curcuma (Curcuma longa)10015
goji berry (Lycium barbarum)9313
grape marc and seeds (Vitis L.)10015
horsetail (Equisetum arvense)1006
rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis)9620

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Žitek, T.; Dariš, B.; Finšgar, M.; Knez, Ž.; Bjelić, D.; Knez Hrnčič, M. The Effect of Polyphenolics in Extracts from Natural Materials on Metabolic Activity of Metastatic Melanoma WM-266-4 Cells. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103499

AMA Style

Žitek T, Dariš B, Finšgar M, Knez Ž, Bjelić D, Knez Hrnčič M. The Effect of Polyphenolics in Extracts from Natural Materials on Metabolic Activity of Metastatic Melanoma WM-266-4 Cells. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(10):3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Žitek, Taja, Barbara Dariš, Matjaž Finšgar, Željko Knez, Dragana Bjelić, and Maša Knez Hrnčič. 2020. "The Effect of Polyphenolics in Extracts from Natural Materials on Metabolic Activity of Metastatic Melanoma WM-266-4 Cells" Applied Sciences 10, no. 10: 3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103499

APA Style

Žitek, T., Dariš, B., Finšgar, M., Knez, Ž., Bjelić, D., & Knez Hrnčič, M. (2020). The Effect of Polyphenolics in Extracts from Natural Materials on Metabolic Activity of Metastatic Melanoma WM-266-4 Cells. Applied Sciences, 10(10), 3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop