Next Article in Journal
Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of the Primary Stability in D3 Synthetic Bone of Two Different Shapes and Pitches of the Implant Threads
Previous Article in Journal
Correlations between Process and Geometric Parameters in Additive Manufacturing of Austenitic Stainless Steel Components Using 3DPMD
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on the Shock Response Characteristics of a Threaded Connection Using the Thin-Layer Element Method

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(12), 5611; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125611
by A’min Yan 1, Xiaofeng Wang 1, He Yang 2, Fenglei Huang 1 and Aiguo Pi 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(12), 5611; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125611
Submission received: 14 May 2021 / Revised: 11 June 2021 / Accepted: 15 June 2021 / Published: 17 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanical Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Main Comment

Nonlinear factors such as the contact stiffness and friction damping at the threaded inter- face of a projectile-fuse system significantly affect the dynamic response characteristics. To obtain  the dynamic response of the fuze body accurately during penetration, it is necessary to characterise  these nonlinear factors reasonably. Because the existing structural dynamic software cannot effectively deal with nonlinear factors, the thin-layer element method was used to represent the nonlinear factors in this study. By combining the thread elastic model with thin-layer element principles, an effective method for determining the material parameters of the thin-layer element was established theoretically, which provided a different method of determining material parameters, not  just relying on experiments. The accuracy of the material parameters was verified based on modal  experiments with threaded tubes having different specifications. The errors were within 5 %, indicating the reliability of the theoretical determination method for the material parameters. In addition, projectile penetration into a semi-infinite concrete target was tested to verify the accuracy of  the thin-layer element modelling. Compared with the ‘TIED’ constraint method, the resonant frequency obtained with the thin-layer element method was in better agreement with that of the experimental data. The maximum error decreased from 15.7 % to 7.8 %, indicating that the thin-layer  element method could accurately represent the nonlinear factors. Thus, this study serves as a reference for accurately evaluating the dynamic response of the fuze body of a penetrator.

 

The paper is well structured and informative, with updated references, but authors are encouraged to go to another phase of manuscript review to address the following issues.

The manuscript should be revised to address errors in several places.  Several examples from the text follow (p - page):

(p.3)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 1.

(p.3)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 1.

(p.4)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 2.

(p.5)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 3.

(p.5)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 2.

(p.5)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 3.

(p.6)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 4.

(p.6)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 4.

(p.7)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 5.

(p.9)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 6.

(p.9)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 5.

(p.10)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 7.

(p.10)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 6.

(p.10)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 7.

(p.11)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 8.

(p.12)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 9.

(p.12)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 10.

(p.13)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 11.

(p.13)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 12.

(p.13)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 8.

(p.14)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 13.

(p.14)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 9.

(p.15)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 14.

(p.16)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 15.

(p.17)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 16.

(p.17)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Figure 17.

(p.18)  It is necessary to add a source to describe the Table 10.

 

(p.18) In conclusion, in addition to the above, I would expect an expression of opinion and perspective of the authors on the issue of the paper. Finally, the authors of the article should pay more attention to the overall writing and clarity of their article, which should support the demonstration of their findings.

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this paper, the nonlinear dynamic behaviour of a projectile-fuse system is studied. In particular, the influence of contact stiffness and friction damping, which represent relevant nonlinear factors, at the threaded interface of the system is investigated on the basis of Thin-Layer Element method.

The present paper is scientifically interesting, well written and arranged, reporting several relevant observations and results. It presents many strengths and some little weaknesses.

Strengths

1) The accuracy of the theoretical model proposed is properly verified by means of comparisons with experiments to understand actual effect of nonlinear factors on the vibration response of the system.

2) The theoretical procedure adopted to determine TLE material parameters, i.e. Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio and shear modulus, is correct.

3) FE modelling of the projectile-fuse system and FRF curves of TLE vs. TIED method are right.

Weaknesses

1) Several small English Language mistakes are present throughout the text, which must be corrected​ in the reviewed version of the paper.

2) Quality of Figure 1 should be increased.

3) Term “fuse” instead of “fuze” should be adopted within the text.

4) How are “free boundary conditions” simulated in the theoretical model?

5) In this work, TLE method is adopted to analyse friction damping at the interface of the system. Vibration reduction of mechanical components represents a relevant issue. Actually, this can be obtained by increasing the damping behaviour at the interfaces of multi-layer functionally graded composites. The Authors are invited to consider and also discuss this topic in the Introduction, by reporting related references available in literature, as for example:

a) Catania, G.; Strozzi, M. Damping oriented design of thin-walled mechanical components by means of multi-layer coating technology. Coatings 2018, 8, 73.

b) Yu, L.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, C.; Xu, H. Damping efficiency of the coating structure. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2005, 42, 3045-3058.

c) Rongong, J.A.; Goruppa, A.A.; Buravalla, V.R.; Tomlinson, G.R.; Jones, F.R. Plasma deposition of constrained layer damping coatings. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 2004, 218, 669-680.

Therefore, in the opinion of the Reviewer, by considering the previous notes, the paper should be accepted for publication after minor revision.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop