Junction Properties Interpretation of Textile Geogrids Using Multi-Junction Clamp

Abstract

In this paper, multi-junction clamp was used for junction strength evaluation under 20, 50 and 100 mm/min of strain rate at ambient condition. One~eight rib specimens were gripped in the clamps and each gage length was 50 mm, 100 mm and 150 mm, respectively. Warp knitted and woven type geogrids were used to compare the effects of multi-junction clamping on junction and tensile strength, respectively. The results indicate that junction strength decreased while the number of junctions increased. When the strain rate was increased, junction strength of woven type increased, but there was no effect of strain rate on warp knitted type. The newly designed clamp test for geogrid junction strength in this research is more accurate than the single-junction test, considering the scale effect of specimens.

1. Introduction

Textile geogrids(referred to as geogrid) are the representative reinforcement materials consisting of connected parallel sets of intersecting ribs with aperture of sufficient size to allow strike-through of surrounding soil, stone, or other geotechnical materials. Thus, geogrids are matrix-like materials with large open spaces called apertures which are typically 10 to 100 mm between ribs that are called longitudinal and transverse, respectively [1,2,3]. The network structure of geogrids gives stronger interaction to adjacent soil than other sheet type reinforcement. In general, the interaction between soil and geogrid is divided into three terms; (a) friction of geogrid to adjacent soil, (b) friction soil to soil directly contacted through apertures and (c) passive resistance of cross direction ribs of geogrids. Geogrid imposed loads due to a friction of cross direction rib surface to soil, and passive resistance of cross direction ribs, are transferred through junction to mechanical direction rib. Therefore, sufficient junction strength is needed to carry the induced force [4]. In general, junction efficiency and junction strength per unit width is calculated by a conversion equation that is recommended in GRI GG-2 [5]. The GRI GG-2 test method has an inherent weakness in not being able to take into account the scale effect of geogrid specimens. Most of the geosynthetics being used for civil engineering are used as tensile members, and they are subject to an assessment of their tensile strength by taking a specimen of wide width [6,7,8]. Therefore, more reliable test methods which include the scale effect are needed. The current trend in the assessment of the tensile strength of geosynthetics is that tensile strength tests on a specimen with a width as wide as possible. This study is a desirable attempt to provide more accurate and reliable test data, considering the scale effect of a specimen. In this study, the multi-junction test method was suggested for the assessment of the geogrids junction strength to consider the aperture size scale effect.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of Geogrids

PET filament woven and warp knitted geogrids with PVC coating were used. Figure 1 shows a picture of the geogrid used in this study. The specification and physical properties of geogrids were confirmed and are represented in

Table 1. Specifications of geogrids.

Geogrid	Raw Material /Coating Agent	Number of Ribs (/m)	Mechanical Properties
			Ultimate Strength (ton/m)		Elongationat at Break (%)
			MD	CMD	MD	CMD
W-GG-1	PET/PVC	47	6	3	12	NA
W-GG-2	PET/PVC	38	10	3	12	NA
WK-GG-1	PET/PVC	42	6	3	12	NA
WK-GG-2	PET/PVC	38	10	3	12	NA

MD is machine direction and CMD is cross machine direction, respectively.

.

2.2. Single and Multi-Junction Tests

A testing apparatus as described in Figure 2a is used mainly for the assessment of only one junction strength of a geogrid, according to GRI GG-2. The test method uses a clamping fixture that grips the transverse ribs of the geogrid immediately adjacent to and on each side of the longitudinal rib. The lower portion of the longitudinal rib is gripped in a standard clamp, and each clamp is mounted in a tensile testing machine, where the test specimen is pulled apart. This method gives single-junction strength, junction efficiency and geogrids junction strength per unit width. The first values of single-junction strength are obtained directly from the test results. In previous research old designed multi-junction clamp was used to test geogrids junction strength (Figure 2b).

The basic concept for this equipment was to widen the single-junction test clamp and the point-to-point length was determined by the aperture size of test conditions. For the old designed multi-junction test, a point-to-point length was 25 mm and the width of the clamp was 280 mm. The upper clamp has 11 gripping points for junctions and the lower clamp is a kind of flat type which also has 11 gripping points [9,10]. Using this modified method of determination, the geogrid junction strength should be more reasonable than the single-junction test. However, this kind of clamp is only suitable in testing the geogrids which aperture size was 25 mm. A newly developed multi-clamp was used to test junction strength. Figure 2 shows a composed drawing of multi-junction grip for junction strength testing of geogrid. The clamp is composed of a set of single grips in parallel. The pitch of the clamp grip can be freely adjusted. The total number of the restraining grip is 11. In the lower part, a normal type rib clamp was used. Figure 2c shows the newly designed multi-junction clamps. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the newly developed multi-junction testing apparatus and test condition (strain rate, specimen length and junction numbers), multi-junction clamp was used for junction strength with 20, 50 and 100 mm/min test speed at ambient condition. One~eight rib specimens were gripped in the clamps and the gage length was 50 mm, 100 mm and 150 mm. Furthermore, single-junction test samples were prepared according to the GRI-GG 2 test method while the test process was according to ASTM D4595 [11] for united test condition. The multi-junction test has been used under the same testing conditions and procedure as ASTM D 4595 except for the clamp devices. The multi-junction clamp proposed in this paper is a clamp that minimizes the error of the test result due to slipping by improving the slippage of the specimen held by the clamp compared to the conventional clamp.

2.3. Single and Wide-Width Tensile Tests

Single and wide-width tensile strength test conditions were utilized according to the ASTM D4595 test method. Roll grip clamp was used in this test and total test conditions for junction strength are representedin

Table 2. Specifications of test conditions.

Properties	Single-Junction Test	Multi-Junction Test	Single Tensile Test	Wide-Width Tensile Test
Scale effect	Unconsidered	Considered	Unconsidered	Considered
Slip	Unconsidered	Unconsidered	Considered	Considered
Strain rate (mm/min)	70 (20, 50,100)	70 (20, 50, 100)	70	70
Specimen width	1 rib	1~8 rib (200 mm)	1 rib	200 mm
Specimen length (mm)	300 (50, 100, 150)	300 (50, 100, 150)	300	300

.

3. Theoretical Background

In this study a single-junction test was carried out using the multi-junction clamp device. From the test results, geogrid junction strength per unit width and junction efficiency (standard) is calculated:

J_rib = I/n

(1)

J_grid = (J_rib) (n_junction)/w

(2)

E_junction = (J_rib/T_rib) × 100

(3)

where, J_rib = single-junction strength (average); J_i = single-junction strength of each junction (experimental value); n = total number of test specimens; J_grid = geogird junction strength per unit width; n_junction = number of junctions in a unit width; w = unit width (typically 1 m or 1 ft); E_junction = junction efficiency; T_rib = tensile strength of single rib (by ASTM D6637 [12]).

The experimental results were reported in terms of the multi-junction strength per specific number of ribs and the geogirds junction strength per unit width computed by the following equation:

$${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{multi}-\mathrm{rib}}={\displaystyle \sum _{\mathrm{i}=1}^{\mathrm{n}}{\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{i}-\mathrm{multi}}/\mathrm{n}}$$

(4)

$${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{grid}}=\frac{\left({\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{multi}-\mathrm{rib}}\left)\right({\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{junction}}\right)}{\left(\mathrm{W}\right)({\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{test}})}$$

(5)

$${\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{junction}}=\frac{{\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{multi}-\mathrm{rib}}}{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{wide}-\mathrm{width}}}\text{×}100$$

(6)

where J_multi-rib = junction strength of a specimen width i number of junctions (average); J_i-multi = each junction’s junction strength width i number of junctions (experimental value); n = total number of test specimens; J_grid = geogird junction strength per unit width; n_junction = number of geogird junction per unit width; W = unit width (typically 1 m or 1 ft); n_test = number of junction in the tested specimen; T_grid = geogrid tensile strength per unit width.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Optimization of Geogrid Multi-Junction Strength Evaluation

Table 3. Single-junction test results by grip position.

Geogrid	Value	20 mm/min		50 mm/min		100 mm/min
		GRI	New	GRI	New	GRI	New
W-GG-2	Jsingle (kgf)	19.2	18.5	19.8	18.8	20.4	19.7
	Elongation (mm)	3.9	4.1	4.2	4.3	4.2	4.2
WK-GG-2	Jsingle (kgf)	39.1	37.7	39	38	39.6	38
	Elongation (mm)	7.0	7.4	6.4	7.4	6.6	7.0

shows the test results of single-junction strength classified by grip position. In the GRI test method, the upper grip position is as close as possible to the vertical center rib. However, this newly developed test method recommends the upper grip position in the middle of the vertical center rib. The values of single-junction strength tested by the newly developed method are less than those tested according to GRI GG-2 for woven and warp knitted types. The values of elongation displayed in an opposite trend. GRI GG-2 determines the specimen in an ideal condition in order to investigate the maximum junction strength. However, in soil geogrid cross rib suffers variable curvature ribbing, and the peak of the curvature is the center bearing rib. Therefore, gripping the center of the cross rib is more appropriate to represent actual utilizing condition.

As with the single-junction test, the average junction strength per one rib and the geogrids junction strength per unit width are also calculated by using multi-junction test results. Firstly, geogrids which have 1–8 junctions were tested and curves of junction strength to number of junction were plotted. Secondly, normalized values of junction strength were calculated for each sample. Figure 3 shows the junction strength plotted against the number of junctions in different specimen length. Results of junction strength were carried out with different lengths showing that there was no change in junction strength at rupture point because woven and warp knitted materials contained PET filament. Therefore, in order to derive precise data, the same conditions except for specimen length were summarized and analyzed.

Figure 4 shows the results of regression analysis on the number of junctions versus junction strength with strain rate of geogrids. For woven type geogrids, all the plots were divided uniformly and the curves showed the same trend. Hence, the data have good reliability. Junction strength for geogrids were linearly increased with the numbers of junction and fitting was excellent with an R-squared value greater than 0.99. The difference is considered to be caused by scale effect and variation in the difference of manufactured product. For warp knitted geogrids, each normalized value is less than the value tested by single-junction test because of scale effect. The figure illustrates that junction strength strongly depends on junction number. When the numbers of junction point are less than three (including three), the normalized junction strength of woven type decreases markedly. When the numbers of junction point ranged from four to eight (including eight), the normalized junction strength of woven type changed slightly.

Figure 5 shows that woven and warp knitted type geogrids showed residual strength increase over the peak strength. When junction part of woven type geogrid junctions were pulled out, load-strain curve was drawn by by considering effect of each junction part mathematically and peak point appearance was not affected by any member over the peak strength. Once the junction number was more than four, their mutual-effect nearly reached equilibrium and the data were stabilized. Woven type geogrid junction strength increased with strain rate because of pulling-out mechanism. When strain rate increased, abrasion force also increased. Junction strength of warp knitted type lineally decreased while junction number increased. Therefore, when multi-junction strength was tested, peak point appeared as long as any of the junctions were broken up. There is no effect of strain rate on warp knitted type. The result indicated that the variable of a specimen with less than three junctions was caused by unstable balance and without considering scale effect sufficiently. From the results of the multi-junction test, it is indicated that a specimen with more than four junctions can provide reliable data of junction strength with scale effect taken into consideration.

Figure 6 shows the standard deviation data of normalized value plotted against junction number. As a result, the variables for specimens with fewer than three joints were irregularly affected by the mutual influence of the junction parts, and the scale effect of the junction parts did not have a significant effect. When the junction number was more than four (including four), the value of standard deviation decreased slightly. From this review, it is seen that the normalization of junction strength is more reasonable with increasing of junctions. Therefore, in order to consider the sufficient scale effect, the junction width should be as wide as possible. Considering various factors effecting the results of junction strength, and according to the GRI-GG2 test method, In the multi-junction stregnth test, the distance between grips was maintained at a minimum of 100 mm, and the clamp width was set to 200 mm, and the strain rate was 10 ± 3%/min.

4.2. Analysis of Tensile Property and Junction Property for Geogrids

The results of the multi-junction test proposed in this study are summarized in

Table 4. Results of multi-junction strength test.

W-GG-1		W-GG-2		WK-GG-1		WK-GG-2
Strength (kgf)	Strain (%)	Strength (kgf)	Strain (%)	Strength (kgf)	Strain (%)	Strength (kgf)	Strain (%)
115.74	3.5	166.3	4.0	273.6	8.86	253.3	7.3

.

The results of the single and multi-junction tests were compared and analyzed, along with the single and wide-width tensile tests. Equations (1)–(3) were applied in order to calculate the geogrid junction strength per unit width and junction efficiency (standard). These calculated values were then compared with the values in the multi-junction strength test calculated from Equations (4)–(6) (proposed). Similar to the tensile test, comparing the junction strength from the single-junction test with the multi-junction test, multi-junction test values are smaller than single-junction test values. This difference is due to the scale effect, and the multi-junction test is more accurate than the single-junction test. The scale effect of tensile and junction tests is shown in

Table 5. Results of tensile and junction test.

Geogrid	Tsingle-rib (T/m)	Twide-width (T/m)	Tscale effect	Jsingle-rib (T/m)	Jwide-width (T/m)	Jscale effect
W-GG-1	8	7.8	0.97	1.43	1.29	0.90
W-GG-2	12.8	13.1	1.02	1.52	1.2	0.79
WK-GG-1	7.6	7.0	0.92	0.56	0.54	0.97
WK-GG-2	13	12.8	0.98	0.86	0.79	0.92

. Scale effect exists in both the tensile and junction tests. However, comparing the value of the single tensile test and wide-width tensile tests, there is a slight change because of good stability in the property of tensile strength and handling process. The value of scale effect in junction test is much lower than that of tensile test, especially of woven type. This is due to single-junction strength data of the product distributing more disordered than the single tensile test, and that multi-junction clamp has a higher tendency to error during handling. Therefore, the multi-junction test results in large strength reduction.

Table 6. Junction efficiency of geogrids.

Value	Geogrid
	W-GG-1	W-GG-2	WK-GG-1	WK-GG-2
Esingle	7.38	6.64	18	11.9
Ewide-width	7.77	5.76	16.5	9.15

presents junction efficiency derived from Equations (3) and (6). Compared to the junction efficiency of the single-junction test with the multi-junction test, multi-junction test values are slightly lower than single test values except for the six ton woven type. This difference is due to the scale effect of the multi-junction test which is bigger than the wide-width tensile test. Using the multi-junction test method can be more accurate in representing junction efficiency than the single-junction test, considering scale effect.

Figure 7 shows the difference between wide-width and junction-width tensile tests. The value of tensile strength, which uses the multi-junction clamp, is markedly less than using the roll clamp. The significant distance due to slippage occurs during the multi-junction test.

5. Conclusions

The total trend of junction strength of geogrid decreased with the number of junctions. When strain rate increased, geogrids of woven type junction strength increased, while there is no effect by strain rate on warp knitted type. The junction strength with junction numbers under different strain rate showed the same trend in both woven and warp knitted types. Specimen length does not affect junction strength. Similar to the tensile test, geogrid junction strength values from the multi-junction test are lower than those from the single-junction test due to the scale effect of the specimen. The junction strength correction coefficient value is lower than tensile strength, especially with warp knitted type, which shows a marked decrease in junction strength. It is appropriate to evaluate the geogrid junction strength and junction efficiency by using the geogrid multi-junction test method considering scale effect. In order to minimize the multi-junction strength measurement error of geogrid, the mutual influence of factors such as cyclic load time, polymer raw material, maximum grain size, and the gradation and the shape of the soil particles (rounded/angular) was quantitatively evaluated. It is thought that further research to interpret this should be carried out.