Next Article in Journal
Sampling Rate Impact on Precise Point Positioning with a Low-Cost GNSS Receiver
Next Article in Special Issue
Involvement of the Orexinergic System in Feeding
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study of Military Crawl as a Special Type of Human Quadripedal Automatic Locomotion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Presence of Systemic Amyloidosis in Mice with Partial Deficiency in Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide (PACAP) in Aging
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Doxycycline and Minocycline Act as Positive Allosteric Modulators of the PAC1 Receptor and Induce Plasminogen Activators in RT4 Schwann Cells

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(16), 7673; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167673
by Sarah Thomas Broome 1, Giuseppe Musumeci 2 and Alessandro Castorina 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(16), 7673; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167673
Submission received: 27 July 2021 / Revised: 16 August 2021 / Accepted: 17 August 2021 / Published: 20 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Neuropeptide Biology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this manuscript, the authors have demonstrated that doxycline or minocycline treatment induces tPA and uPA via activating PAC1 by various means, i.e. QPCR, zymography, western blotting. The experiments were well-designed, performed and properly analyzed. Only some minor points need to be addressed.

  1. In figure 1, the authors showed that doxycline (100ng/ml) and minocycline (100ng/ml) induce the highest expression of tPA and uPA. Please explain why the expressions of tPA and uPA are lower upon stimulation of higher doxycline and minocycline.
  2. In figure 2, please include the statistical analysis among different groups to demonstrate whether cell viability is affected by DOX and MIN at high concentration.
  3. In figure 5, the authors used PACAP6-38 as a PAC1 antagonist. However, the concentration of PACAP6-38 employed in this experiment was much higher than its IC50, causing the possible problem of unspecificity. The author should address this question by titrating PACAP6-38 or introducing PAC1 knockdown. 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper by Broome et al is a straight forward attempt to explore one of the reasons behind neuroprotection and axonal regeneration. The authors have presented data sets from conventional bio-analytical experiments to show a plausible over-expression of tPA and uPA which they attribute to antibiotic effect. The data set is nice. But there are a few concerns especially the data presentation, english language and grammar, low resolution immunocytochemistry images, lack of sufficient novelty. The authors need to explain more especially how this data could lead to development of novel therapeutic solutions to address diverse neurological disorders. 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop