Next Article in Journal
Influence of Root Canal Sealers and Obturation Techniques on Vertical Root Fracture Resistance. An In Vitro Experiment
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating Shape Variation Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis and Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Acoustic and Dynamic Response of Unbaffled Plates of Arbitrary Shape
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluctuating Asymmetry and Stress in Macaca fuscata: Does Captivity Affect Morphology?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 17
10.3390/app11178020
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Parallel Evolution of Allometric Trajectories of Trophic Morphology between Sympatric Morphs of Mesoamerican Astyanax (Characidae)

by
Carlos A. Garita-Alvarado
1,2 and
Claudia Patricia Ornelas-García
1,*
1
Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior S/N, Ciudad de México CP 04510, Mexico
2
Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior S/N, Ciudad de México CP 04510, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(17), 8020; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178020
Submission received: 19 June 2021 / Revised: 9 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 30 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Geometric Morphometrics and Computational Imaging)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Parallel evolution of the body shape and trophic-related traits has been detected between sympatric pairs of lake-dwelling characin fishes in Mesoamerica. Here, we evaluated the variation in and the ontogenetic allometric trajectories of trophic morphology between sympatric Astyanax morphs (elongate and deep-body) in two geographic systems, Lake Catemaco (Mexico) and San Juan River basin (Nicaragua and Costa Rica). Using geometric morphometrics, we determined the shape variation and disparity in the premaxillary bone, and the patterns of allometric trajectories between morphs in each system. We found a higher differentiation and disparity in the premaxilla shape between morphs from San Juan River basin than between the Lake Catemaco ones. We found shared (parallel evolution) patterns of divergence between systems, which included allometric trajectories showing a positive correlation between the premaxilla shape and log centroid size, as well as trajectories being extended in the elongated-body morph (truncated in the deep-body morph). Regarding the unique patterns of divergence, we recovered parallel allometric trajectories between morphs from Lake Catemaco, while the San Juan River basin morphs showed divergent trajectories. Our results are congruent with the hypothesis that divergence in trophic morphology can be considered a triggering factor in the divergence in the genus Astyanax from Mesoamerica.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Body size influences many traits in animals [1,2,3,4,5]. Allometry is defined as the variation in morphometric variables or other features of organisms associated with size. Thus, ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometries are recognized based on whether this relationship is over the development of individuals, across individuals at a similar developmental stage, or across species, respectively [2,6]. Ontogenetic allometry could contribute to evolutionary diversification, as has been described in studies of morphological diversification associated with ontogenetic allometric trajectories at intra- and interspecific levels (e.g., [7,8,9,10,11,12]). According to the latter idea, changes in ontogenetic trajectories could have an adaptive basis, being useful to the study of how different selective pressures imposed by ecological factors could affect development [10,12,13].
The fish genus Astyanax Baird and Girard, 1854, distributed in North and Central America, shows ideal features for the study of ontogenetic allometric trajectories associated with trophic adaptation in an ecological divergence context. These fishes are known to adapt to a very wide range of ecological conditions, the cave-adapted morphs being the most conspicuous example [14,15,16,17]. Interestingly, previous works have found evidence of the parallel evolution of sympatric morphs associated with trophic morphology and body shape divergence in different Mesoamerican lakes inhabited by lineages of Astyanax, which evolved independently [18,19,20,21,22]. This has been shown in two distant geographical systems, the San Juan River basin in Central America (which includes the Lakes Managua and Nicaragua), and the Lake Catemaco system in Mexico [20,23,24]. The lacustrine morphs, consisting of an elongate-body and a deep-body morph (Figure 1), show major morphological differences, which prompted their original consideration as different genera (i.e., Astyanax and Bramocharax, [25,26]). Some of the morphological differences distinguishing these morphs correspond to the body depth and the head length, as well as to their trophic morphology (i.e., number of maxillary teeth and of cuspids on the anterior tooth of premaxilla, see [21,22]), which are associated with alternative trophic habits. Additionally, a geographical cline (i.e., a differentiation gradient between north and south systems) in morphological differentiation between morphs was suggested between the Lake Catemaco and San Juan River systems [22], and, recently, we explored the genetic and ecological differentiation between sympatric morphs of Astyanax in these systems, finding evidence of a geographical cline also in the genetic differentiation [23,24]. The morphs from the San Juan River system show greater genetic differentiation in contrast to the lack of thereof between morphs in Lake Catemaco, suggesting that both systems represent different stages of divergence between sympatric Astyanax morphs pairs [23,24].
Previous studies have shown that size is an important factor determining body shape variation in Astyanax morphs from the Lake Catemaco and San Juan River systems [19,21]. Particularly, there are differences in body size between morphs in Lake Catemaco [19], where the elongate-body morph reaches a larger size than the deep-body morph. Despite the possible relevance of size in trophic morphology variation and its potential role on the diversification in the Astyanax genus [21,22] and in Characiforms [27], it remains to be explored how trophic morphology varies throughout ontogeny and if it can be considered as a mechanism promoting morphological diversification. Here, we focused on determining the ontogenetic allometric trajectories of trophic morphology between sympatric morphs of Astyanax in two different geographic systems, by analyzing the shape of a relevant trophic structure, the premaxillary bone.
We have a two-fold objective. First, we aimed to compare the variation in the premaxilla shape and the disparity (i.e., morphological diversity, [28]) between morphs inside each system. Second, we aimed to describe the patterns of ontogenetic allometric trajectories of the premaxillary bone between sympatric morphs of Astyanax in each system and to elucidate shared (parallel evolution) and unique patterns of divergence between morphs for each system.

2. Methods

2.1. Sampling Collection

We collected Astyanax fish of the two different morphs from two geographical systems: in México, from Lake Catemaco (belonging to Papaloapan basin); and in Central America, from San Juan River basin, which includes Lake Managua, Lake Nicaragua, and the Sarapiquí River, which flows into the San Juan River, the outlet of the two mentioned lakes (Figure 1). We focused on late ontogenetic stages (i.e., post-embryonic development), as is usual in allometric trajectories studies (see [29]). We analyzed a total of 218 specimens (130 deep-body and 88 elongate-body) collected in 11 sampling sites in both systems between November 2011 and January 2017 (Table 1, Figure 1). We used cast nets and gill nets to collect the fish and assigned specimens to morphs based on their external morphology [25,26]. Fish were euthanized in iced water and voucher specimens were deposited at the Colección Nacional de Peces, IBUNAM, México.

2.2. Premaxilla Shape Variation

For each specimen, we dissected the premaxillary bone and cleaned it with 1 M of KOH solution for 15 min. We took a picture of each bone with a stereoscope (Zeiss Stemi305) and the shape of the premaxilla was quantified using a 2D geometric morphometric approach. We digitalized two landmarks and 50 semilandmarks (Figure 1C) using TPSDig2, version 2.31 [30]. We performed a Procrustes superimposition and obtained relative warps (RWs) and the centroid size (measured as the square root of the summed, squared distances of all landmarks from their geometric center, which is considered a proxy of size in geometric morphometric studies) using the program TPS Relw, version 1.69 [30]).
To describe the variation in the shape of the premaxilla between morphs in each system, we plotted RW1 vs. RW2 and compared the disparity in shape (Procrustes variance) between morphs by system. We used the Geomorph package in R (R Core Team, 2013, version 4.02: http://cran.r-project.org, accessed on 22 June 2020) to perform the disparity analysis. The Procrustes superimposition was carried out using the gpagen function, and comparisons of Procrustes variance (morphol.disparity function) were made between sympatric morphs. Additionally, to graphically represent the differences in the shape of premaxilla between morphs, we calculated the consensus shape of Procrustes coordinates of morphs by system (mshape function) and plotted the shape differences using the deep-body morph for reference (plotRefToTarget function, magnification = 2) for each system.

2.3. Ontogenetic Allometric Trajectories

In order to analyze the late allometric ontogenetic trajectories, we first regressed RW1 and RW2 against the log centroid size for each morph in both systems. We then performed ANCOVA models for each system to test for differences in the shape of premaxilla (RW1 and RW2 of premaxilla: response variables) related to log centroid size (covariate), morph, and the interaction morph*log centroid size (to test for differences in slopes between morphs). We included a biplot of the RW1 and RW2 to represent the overall shape of the premaxilla. ANCOVA models and regression analyses were performed in R.

3. Results

3.1. Premaxilla Shape Variation

We found a shared pattern of divergence in the premaxilla shape (parallel evolution) between morphs in the two systems analyzed (Figure 2). RW1 was related to the width and the angle of the ascending process, with positive values showing a narrower ascending process and a sharper angle corresponding to the elongate-body morph in both systems, with opposite patterns found in the deep-body morph. RW2 showed variation related to the width of the premaxilla and length of the ascending process, with morphs showing no differentiation based on this relative warp. RW1 and RW2 together explained most of the variation (80.2%) of the shape of the premaxilla (Supplementary Material Table S1A for explained variation of all relative warps). In the northern system, Lake Catemaco, morphs showed some overlap in premaxilla shape (Figure 2A), contrasting with the southern morphs from the San Juan River system, which showed a larger divergence, with almost no overlap in premaxilla shape between morphs (Figure 2B), depicting a geographical cline, increasing north to south, in the premaxilla shape differentiation between the morphs.
The analyses of the premaxilla shape revealed no differences in disparity between morphs in the Lake Catemaco system (Procrustes variance in the deep-body morph: 0.008 vs. the elongate-body morph: 0.01, p = 0.21), while in the San Juan River system, the elongate-body morph showed a two-fold higher disparity of premaxilla shape than the deep-body morph (Procrustes variance in the elongate-body morph: 0.015 vs. the deep-body morph: 0.009, p < 0.001). We can appreciate these differences in the graphical representation in the vectors’ length toward the elongate-body morph, where the morphs from the San Juan River showed a larger differentiation (Figure 3B,D) than the morphs from the Lake Catemaco system (Figure 3A,C). Thus, we observed a parallel pattern of premaxilla shape evolution in the two systems when plotting the shape differences using the deep-body morph for reference.

3.2. Ontogenetic Allometric Trajectories

We found a positive correlation between RW1 and log centroid size in the regression analysis for both morphs in the two systems (Table 2, Figure 4A,B). This indicates that specimens with a longer premaxilla also had a sharper angle and narrower ascending processes. For RW2, only the regression analysis for the deep-body morph from the San Juan River system showed a positive association with log centroid size (Table 2, Figure 4C,D). In this case, as the log centroid size increases, fish showed narrower premaxilla and longer ascending processes (Figure 4D).
In the late ontogenetic allometric trajectories analysis of the shape of premaxilla for RW1, we found differences between morphs in both systems as revealed by the ANCOVAs (morph term, Table 3). We found differences in the slopes (indicating different direction of allometric trajectories) between morphs in the San Juan system, while in Lake Catemaco, the slopes did not differ statistically, suggesting parallel allometric trajectories (interaction term morph*log Centroid, Table 3). The elongate-body morph showed a parallel pattern of an extended ontogenetic trajectory when compared with its sympatric deep-body morph in both systems (Figure 4A,B). However, in the San Juan River system, the elongate-body morph showed a steeper slope (Figure 4B, Table 2). For the RW2, allometric trajectories of the shape of premaxilla showed contrasting patterns between systems. In the ANCOVA for the Lake Catemaco system, no factor showed a significant effect (Table 3), and there was no difference between morphs and premaxilla shape in relation to size (Figure 4C). Morphs from the San Juan River system showed convergent allometric trajectories for RW2. In the ANCOVA, we found differences in the shape of premaxilla (RW2) between morphs and found differences in slopes (interaction Morpho*log Centroid size was significant, Table 3). As the centroid size increased, the shapes of the premaxilla of both morphs became more similar (Figure 4D).

4. Discussion

In this study, we characterized the degree of variation and disparity of the premaxilla shape and the late ontogenetic allometric trajectories of the premaxillary bone between sympatric morphs of Astyanax in two lacustrine systems, Lake Catemaco in México and San Juan River basin in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. We found parallel evolution in the divergence of the premaxilla shape (i.e., a narrower ascending process and a sharper angle corresponding to the elongate-body morph in both systems) and common patterns in the late ontogenetic allometric trajectory between the morphs in both systems. Interestingly, these patterns have not evolved completely in the same manner in both systems, while there are shared (parallel) but also unique patterns of diversification of the ontogenetic trajectories in each Astyanax setting analyzed. Our results suggest evolvability of the ontogenetic allometric trajectories in Astyanax, supporting the general evidence of the relevance of change in allometric trajectories for biological diversification [13].

4.1. Premaxilla Shape Divergence between Morphs and Systems

The analysis of the premaxilla shape (RW1-RW2 biplot, disparity analysis, and differences in the consensus shape) showed a geographical cline of differentiation between systems. The results are consistent with the patterns of body and head shape divergence previously described [21,22], which showed a larger morphological divergence in body shape, trophic ecomorphology, and dentition between morphs in the San Juan River system than between morphs from the Lake Catemaco system. In addition, the pattern of divergence in premaxilla shape between morphs in the San Juan River system have been characterized [24], and in the present study, we went one step further and compared those patterns with yet another geographically distant system, Lake Catemaco, allowing further understanding of the evolution of the premaxilla shape.
The two systems analyzed belong to independent evolutionary lineages of the genus Astyanax in Mesoamerica, differing in time of divergence, as Lake Catemaco is inhabited by a younger lineage than the lineage inhabiting the Río San Juan system [18]. Time of divergence has been considered an important factor explaining morphological divergence and speciation [27,31,32]. Thus, as the lineage from the Río San Juan system is older than that in the Lake Catemaco system, this longer time of divergence could be associated with the more pronounced morphological divergence and disparity in shape of premaxilla found for this system. A similar pattern of skull shape disparity was found when analyzing 87 cichlids fish species [33] endemic to the Great African lakes Tanganyika, Malawi, and Victoria, where fishes from the youngest of these lakes (L. Victoria) exhibited the lowest amount of skull shape disparity, while the oldest lake (L. Tanganyika) showed the largest disparity [33].

4.2. Patterns of Allometric Ontogenetic Trajectories between Morphs and Systems

Our results showed differences between sympatric morphs in both systems in the late allometric ontogenetic trajectories, although these patterns have not evolved in the same way in both systems. Klingenberg [28] noted that allometric trajectories can potentially change direction, shift sideways through lateral transposition, or be extended or truncated. In addition, Sheets and Zelditch [34] summarized patterns of variation in ontogenetic trajectories based on changes in direction, magnitude (length of trajectory), and outset shape of the trajectory, which could produce parallel, divergent, or convergent patterns of such ontogenetic trajectories. For the RW1 (which accounted for 59.3% of the explained variation and allowed morph discrimination), in Lake Catemaco, we did not find statistical differences in slopes of the allometric trajectories between morphs, suggesting parallel ontogenetic trajectories. However, fitted lines in Figure 4A showed a slightly divergent pattern, with a faster shape change in the elongate-body morph. In the San Juan River System, allometric trajectories for RW1 were clearly divergent [34] between morphs. There was a clear difference in the direction of the ontogenetic trajectories between morphs (as shown by the heterogeneity of slopes); as the size of the premaxilla increased, the elongate-body morph showed a steeper slope, suggesting a faster change in shape than the deep-body morph. In the San Juan River system, the shape of the premaxilla between morphs in the outset of the trajectories is markedly different, arguing also for a larger divergence between San Juan system morphs than between morphs from Lake Catemaco.
A shared pattern for both systems corresponds to the extended allometric trajectory in the elongate-body morphs, corresponding to parallel evolution when compared with their sympatric deep-body morphs. This corresponds to changes in the length of trajectories and, hence, to changes in magnitude [34]; consequently, the elongate-body morph can form a longer premaxilla, while the deep-body morph showed a truncated trajectory. In addition, in agreement with the role of size in Astyanax diversification, Ornelas-García et al. [19] reported in Lake Catemaco a longer body size in the elongate-body morph when compared with the deep-body morph, which also corresponded to an extended trajectory for the elongate-body morph. The patterns of the late ontogenetic allometric trajectories for RW2 were contrasting with the patterns for the RW1. As evidenced by the regression analysis, only the deep-body morph from the San Juan system showed a positive correlation between RW2 and log centroid size, resulting in convergent allometric ontogenetic trajectories for morphs in this system. The shape variation described by the RW2 (width of the premaxilla and length of ascending process) is not clearly associated with morph differentiation in both systems, and therefore, we hypothesize that these premaxilla features are probably not associated with the trophic specialization of morphs.
Several studies have shown an association between the ecology and variation in ontogenetic allometric trajectories in invertebrates [8] and vertebrates [9,10,19,35,36,37,38], with some cases related to morphological diversification or speciation in fishes [7,11,39,40]. In this study, the differences in allometric trajectories between morphs are consistent with the divergent patterns in trophic ecology associated with trophic level considering ecological data (diets and stable isotopic ratios of nitrogen), with the elongate-body morph occupying a higher trophic level in both systems [20,24]. In addition, the shape of the premaxilla showing a sharper angle in the ascending process in the elongate-body morph resembles the shape of premaxilla in another predator characiform, the genus Oligosarcus [41]. Other lacustrine fish groups, such as Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), also present sympatric morphs showing differences in ontogenetic allometric trajectories, which are associated with contrasting ecological adaptations of diet (piscivores vs. omnivore) and habitat use (littoral and pelagic zones or littoral and profundal zone) [7,11].
Differences in premaxilla shape in the outset of the late allometric trajectories in the range of size analyzed can explain, at least in part, the differentiation between morphs in the two systems studied; however, information is lacking about early embryonic development and early allometric trajectories of the morphs. In other Astyanax populations, some studies have addressed the early development of trophic morphology. For example, in Astyanax mexicanus, Trapani et al. [42] described the early ontogenetic transition from unicuspid to multicuspid oral dentition, and Atukorala and Franz-Odendaal [43] studied the development of pharyngeal dentition. However, the generalization of these patterns to other species or populations of Astyanax is unknown, and a detailed description of patterns associated with size is still lacking. Future studies on early ontogenetic allometric trajectories between Astyanax morphs from San Juan River and Lake Catemaco could shed light on the first stages of divergence between morphs (i.e., embryonic, or post-hatching development).

5. Conclusions

This study provides additional support to the relevance of trophic morphology in the diversification of Astyanax fish in different Mesoamerican lakes, and suggests evolvability of the allometric ontogenetic trajectories associated with the ecological divergence. In recent years, the genus Astyanax has built up as an important model in evolutionary biology [44]. However, to our knowledge, this study is the first analysis of ontogenetic allometric trajectories in Astyanax, and gaining knowledge on these trajectories will surely prove very useful to our understanding of morphological evolution in this complex system.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app11178020/s1, Table S1. Percentage of variance explained by the relative warps in the premaxilla shape variation analysis (A), Procrustes coordinates (B) and relative warps scores (C).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.G.-A. and C.P.O.-G.; methodology, C.A.G.-A. and C.P.O.-G.; software, C.A.G.-A.; validation, C.A.G.-A. and C.P.O.-G.; formal analysis, C.A.G.-A.; data curation, C.A.G.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A.G.-A.; writing—review and editing, C.A.G.-A. and C.P.O.-G.; supervision, C.P.O.-G.; project administration, C.P.O.-G.; funding acquisition, C.P.O.-G. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

C.A.G.-A. was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México (CONACYT). We thank the support from PAPIIT, UNAM, Project number IN212419, for the field trip and publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Field collection permits and protocols were approved by the Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación and Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía of Costa Rica and Ministerio del Ambiente y los Recursos Naturales (Nicaragua), collecting permits 007-2013-SINAC and SINAC-GASP-PI-R-072-2014 (Costa Rica), and 008-112014/DGPN (Nicaragua).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials Table S1B,C.

Acknowledgments

We thank Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de México for the support to CGA during his PhD study. We thank Marta Barluenga and Carlos Pedraza for useful comments in the final versions of the manuscript. We thank Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación and Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía of Costa Rica and Ministerio del Ambiente y los Recursos Naturales (Nicaragua) for collecting permits 007-2013-SINAC and SINAC-GASP-PI-R-072-2014 (Costa Rica), and 008-112014/DGPN (Nicaragua). We also thank Carlos Pedraza and Marta Barluenga for help on fieldwork.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gould, S.J. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 1966, 41, 587–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Klingenberg, C.P. Multivariate Allometry. In Advances in Morphometrics; NATO ASI Series; Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P., Slice, D.E., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1996; pp. 23–49. [Google Scholar]
  3. Klingenberg, C.P. Size, shape, and form: Concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Dev. Genes Evol. 2016, 226, 113–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Feldman, A.; Sabath, N.; Pyron, R.A.; Mayrose, I.; Meiri, S. Body sizes and diversification rates of lizards, snakes, amphisbaenians and the tuatara. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2016, 25, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Friedman, S.T.; Martinez, C.M.; Price, S.A.; Wainwright, P.C. The influence of size on body shape diversification across Indo-Pacific shore fishes. Evolution 2019, 73, 1873–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pélabon, C.; Firmat, C.; Bolstad, G.H.; Voje, K.L.; Houle, D.; Cassara, J.; Le Rouzic, A.; Hansen, T.F. Evolution of morphological allometry. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1320, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Svanbäck, R.; Eklöv, P. Effects of habitat and food resources on morphology and ontogenetic growth trajectories in perch. Oecologia 2002, 131, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hollander, J.; Adams, D.C.; Johannesson, K. Evolution of adaptation through allometric shifts in a marine snail. Evolution 2006, 60, 2490–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Piras, P.; Salvi, D.; Ferrara, G.; Maiorino, L.; Delfino, M.; Pedde, L.; Kotsakis, T. The role of post-natal ontogeny in the evolution of phenotypic diversity in Podarcis lizards. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24, 2705–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Esquerré, D.; Sherratt, E.; Keogh, J.S. Evolution of extreme ontogenetic allometric diversity and heterochrony in pythons, a clade of giant and dwarf snakes. Evolution 2017, 71, 2829–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Simonsen, M.K.; Siwertsson, A.; Adams, C.E.; Amundsen, P.A.; Præbel, K.; Knudsen, R. Allometric trajectories of body and head morphology in three sympatric Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)) morphs. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 7277–7289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gray, J.A.; Sherratt, E.; Hutchinson, M.N.; Jones, M.E. Changes in ontogenetic patterns facilitate diversification in skull shape of Australian agamid lizards. BMC Evol. Biol. 2019, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Klingenberg, C.P. There’s something afoot in the evolution of ontogenies. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gross, J.B.; Borowsky, R.; Tabin, C.J. A novel role for Mc1r in the parallel evolution of depigmentation in independent populations of the cavefish Astyanax mexicanus. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Jeffery, W.R. Regressive evolution in Astyanax cavefish. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 25–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Elipot, Y.; Hinaux, H.; Callebert, J.; Launay, J.M.; Blin, M.; Rétaux, S. A mutation in the enzyme monoamine oxidase explains part of the Astyanax cavefish behavioural syndrome. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. McGaugh, S.E.; Gross, J.B.; Aken, B.; Blin, M.; Borowsky, R.; Chalopin, D.; Hinaux, H.; Jeffery, W.R.; Keene, A.C.; Ma, L.; et al. The cavefish genome reveals candidate genes for eye loss. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ornelas-García, C.P.; Domínguez-Domínguez, O.; Doadrio, I. Evolutionary history of the fish genus Astyanax Baird & Girard (1854) (Actinopterygii, Characidae) in Mesoamerica reveals multiple morphological homoplasies. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8, 340. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ornelas-García, C.P.; Bastir, M.; Doadrio, I. Morphometric variation between two morphotypes within the Astyanax Baird and Girard, 1854 (Actinopterygii: Characidae) genus, From a Mexican tropical lake. J. Morphol. 2014, 275, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ornelas-García, C.P.; Córdova-Tapia, F.; Zambrano, L.; Bermúdez-González, M.P.; Mercado-Silva, N.; Mendoza-Garfias, B.; Bautista, A. Trophic specialization and morphological divergence between two sympatric species in Lake Catemaco, Mexico. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 4867–4875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garita-Alvarado, C.A.; Barluenga, M.; Ornelas-García, C.P. Parallel evolution of morphs of Astyanax species (Teleostei: Characidae) in México and Central America. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 124, 706–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Powers, A.K.; Garita-Alvarado, C.A.; Rodiles-Hernández, R.; Berning, D.J.; Gross, J.B.; Ornelas-García, C.P. A geographical cline in craniofacial morphology across populations of Mesoamerican lake-dwelling fishes. J. Exp. Zool. Part A Ecol. Integr. Physiol. 2020, 333, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ornelas-García, C.P.; Gonzalez, E.; Tautz, D.; Doadrio, I. Lack of genetic differentiation between two sympatric species of Astyanax (Characidae: Teleostei) in Lake Catemaco, Mexico. Res. Sq. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Garita-Alvarado, C.A.; Garduño-Sánchez, M.; Barluenga, M.; Ornelas-García, C.P. Genetic and ecomorphological divergence between sympatric Astyanax morphs from Central America. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Contreras-Balderas, S.; Rivera-Teillery, R. Bramocharax (Catemaco) caballeroi Subgen. et. sp. nv., del lago de Catemaco, Veracruz, México. Publ. Biológicas Inst. Investig. Científicas UANL 1985, 2, 7–29. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bussing, W.A. Freshwater Fishes of Costa Rica, 1st ed.; Universidad de Costa Rica: San José, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sidlauskas, B. Testing for unequal rates of morphological diversification in the absence of a detailed phylogeny: A case study from Characiform fishes. Evolution 2007, 61, 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Klingenberg, C.P. Heterochrony and allometry: The analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol. Rev. 1998, 73, 79–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Foote, M. Contributions of individual taxa to overall morphological disparity. Paleobiology 1993, 19, 403–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rohlf, F.J. The tps series of software. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal. 2015, 26, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  31. De Queiroz, K. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nosil, P.; Harmon, L.J.; Seehausen, O. Ecological explanations for (incomplete) speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cooper, W.J.; Parsons, K.; McIntyre, A.; Kern, B.; McGee-Moore, A.; Albertson, R.C. Bentho-pelagic divergence of cichlid feeding architecture was prodigious and consistent during multiple adaptive radiations within African rift-lakes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sheets, H.D.; Zelditch, M.L. Studying ontogenetic trajectories using resampling methods and landmark data. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal. 2013, 24, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cardini, A.; O’Higgins, P. Post-natal ontogeny of the mandible and ventral cranium in Marmota species (Rodentia, Sciuridae): Allometry and phylogeny. Zoomorphology 2005, 124, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Urošević, A.; Ljubisavljević, K.; Ivanović, A. Patterns of cranial ontogeny in lacertid lizards: Morphological and allometric disparity. J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26, 399–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Duport-Bru, A.S.; Ponssa, M.L.; Vera Candioti, F. Postmetamorphic ontogenetic allometry and the evolution of skull shape in Nest-building frogs Leptodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Evol. Dev. 2019, 21, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Morris, Z.S.; Vliet, K.A.; Abzhanov, A.; Pierce, S.E. Heterochronic shifts and conserved embryonic shape underlie crocodylian craniofacial disparity and convergence. Proc. R. Soc. B 2019, 286, 20182389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Mina, M.V. Morphological diversification of fish as a consequence of the divergence of ontogenetic trajectories. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 2001, 32, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Corse, E.; Neve, G.; Sinama, M.; Pech, N.; Costedoat, C.; Chappaz, R.; Andre, G. Plasticity of ontogenetic trajectories in cyprinids: A source of evolutionary novelties. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 106, 342–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ribeiro, A.C.; Menezes, N.A. Phylogenetic relationships of the species and biogeography of the characid genus Oligosarcus Günther, 1864 (Ostariophysi, Characiformes, Characidae). Zootaxa 2015, 3949, 41–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Trapani, J.; Yamamoto, Y.; Stock, D.W. Ontogenetic transition from unicuspid to multicuspid oral dentition in a teleost fish: Astyanax mexicanus, the Mexican tetra (Ostariophysi: Characidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2005, 145, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Atukorala, A.D.S.; Franz-Odendaal, T.A. Spatial and temporal events in tooth development of Astyanax Mex. Mech. Dev. 2014, 134, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tabin, C.J. Introduction: The Emergence of the Mexican Cavefish as an Important Model System for Understanding Phenotypic Evolution. In Biology and Evolution of the Mexican Cavefish; Keene, A., Yoshizawa, M., McGaugh, S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
Applsci 11 08020 g001 550
Figure 1. Sampling sites and morphs included in this study. (A) Lake Catemaco system (1–3) and (B) San Juan River system (4–11). (C) Landmarks (black) and 50 semilandmarks (grey) in the premaxilla. Examples of (D) elongate-body and (E) deep-body morphs from San Juan River system. Scale bar in (D,E) = 2 cm.
Figure 1. Sampling sites and morphs included in this study. (A) Lake Catemaco system (1–3) and (B) San Juan River system (4–11). (C) Landmarks (black) and 50 semilandmarks (grey) in the premaxilla. Examples of (D) elongate-body and (E) deep-body morphs from San Juan River system. Scale bar in (D,E) = 2 cm.
Applsci 11 08020 g001
Applsci 11 08020 g002 550
Figure 2. Premaxilla shape variation for (A) Lake Catemaco system and (B) San Juan River system by morph. Deformation grids show shape variation along RW1 (X axis) and RW2 (Y axis).
Figure 2. Premaxilla shape variation for (A) Lake Catemaco system and (B) San Juan River system by morph. Deformation grids show shape variation along RW1 (X axis) and RW2 (Y axis).
Applsci 11 08020 g002
Applsci 11 08020 g003 550
Figure 3. Differences in the consensus shape of premaxilla between morphs for (A) Lake Catemaco and (B) San Juan River systems. Gray dots in the shapes in (A,B) represent the deep-body morph used for reference; change vectors in black show the deformations toward the sympatric elongate-body morph. Examples of premaxilla of the elongate-body morph for (C) Lake Catemaco and (D) San Juan River systems.
Figure 3. Differences in the consensus shape of premaxilla between morphs for (A) Lake Catemaco and (B) San Juan River systems. Gray dots in the shapes in (A,B) represent the deep-body morph used for reference; change vectors in black show the deformations toward the sympatric elongate-body morph. Examples of premaxilla of the elongate-body morph for (C) Lake Catemaco and (D) San Juan River systems.
Applsci 11 08020 g003
Applsci 11 08020 g004 550
Figure 4. Late allometric ontogenetic trajectories of the shape of premaxilla. RW1 and RW2 on log centroid size for (A,C) Lake Catemaco system and (B,D) San Juan River system by morph. Deformation grids on the left show shape variation along RW1 (Y axis) in (A,B), and RW2 (Y axis) in (C,D).
Figure 4. Late allometric ontogenetic trajectories of the shape of premaxilla. RW1 and RW2 on log centroid size for (A,C) Lake Catemaco system and (B,D) San Juan River system by morph. Deformation grids on the left show shape variation along RW1 (Y axis) in (A,B), and RW2 (Y axis) in (C,D).
Applsci 11 08020 g004
Table
Table 1. Number of specimens of both morphs by sampling sites and geographical system. Site numbers according to Figure 1. Size range of specimens (standard length), Lake Catemaco: deep-body 49.4–89.5 mm, elongate body 6.70–135.7 mm, San Juan River: deep-body 45.8–102.1 mm, elongate body 42.9–132.5 mm.
Table 1. Number of specimens of both morphs by sampling sites and geographical system. Site numbers according to Figure 1. Size range of specimens (standard length), Lake Catemaco: deep-body 49.4–89.5 mm, elongate body 6.70–135.7 mm, San Juan River: deep-body 45.8–102.1 mm, elongate body 42.9–132.5 mm.
SystemLake/RiverSampling SiteSite NumberDeep-BodyElongate-Body
Lake CatemacoLake CatemacoMarket1-7
Coyame22214
Tebanca31716
San Juan RiverLake ManaguaPuerto Momotombo411
South of Momotombo volcano577
Isla Escondida662
Lake NicaraguaIsletas de Granada7239
Ometepe8196
Solentiname911
Sarapiquí RiverTambor101824
Tirimbina11161
Table
Table 2. Regression analysis for RW1 and RW2 on log centroid size for Lake Catemaco and San Juan River systems. Bold p values indicate statistically significant results.
Table 2. Regression analysis for RW1 and RW2 on log centroid size for Lake Catemaco and San Juan River systems. Bold p values indicate statistically significant results.
System/MorphRW1RW2
SlopeR2pSlopeR2p
Lake Catemaco
Deep-body0.190.130.020.030.0040.69
Elongate-body0.330.260.0010.00001<0.0010.99
San Juan River
Deep-body0.170.090.0020.210.090.003
Elongate-body0.420.52<0.0010.004<0.0010.94
Table
Table 3. ANCOVA models for RW1 and RW2 for Lake Catemaco and San Juan River systems. Bold p values indicate statistically significant effects. All factors have one degree of freedom.
Table 3. ANCOVA models for RW1 and RW2 for Lake Catemaco and San Juan River systems. Bold p values indicate statistically significant effects. All factors have one degree of freedom.
FactorRW1 RW2
Sum of SquaresFpSum of SquaresFp
Lake Catemaco
Log Centroid size0.1353.41<0.0010.0010.580.44
Morph0.0114.680.030.0042.010.16
Morph*log Centroid size0.0031.250.260.00020.110.73
San Juan River
Log Centroid size0.89459.9<0.0010.04618.86<0.001
Morph0.367188.95<0.0010.0166.660.01
Morph*log Centroid size0.01910.150.0010.0135.440.02
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garita-Alvarado, C.A.; Ornelas-García, C.P. Parallel Evolution of Allometric Trajectories of Trophic Morphology between Sympatric Morphs of Mesoamerican Astyanax (Characidae). Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178020

AMA Style

Garita-Alvarado CA, Ornelas-García CP. Parallel Evolution of Allometric Trajectories of Trophic Morphology between Sympatric Morphs of Mesoamerican Astyanax (Characidae). Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(17):8020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garita-Alvarado, Carlos A., and Claudia Patricia Ornelas-García. 2021. "Parallel Evolution of Allometric Trajectories of Trophic Morphology between Sympatric Morphs of Mesoamerican Astyanax (Characidae)" Applied Sciences 11, no. 17: 8020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178020

APA Style

Garita-Alvarado, C. A., & Ornelas-García, C. P. (2021). Parallel Evolution of Allometric Trajectories of Trophic Morphology between Sympatric Morphs of Mesoamerican Astyanax (Characidae). Applied Sciences, 11(17), 8020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop