Next Article in Journal
One-Step Liquid Phase Polymerization of HEMA by Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Discharges for Ti Dental Implants
Previous Article in Journal
New Flexible Protective Coating for Printed Smart Textiles
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Modeling of Transmission Compliance and Hysteresis Considering Degradation in a Harmonic Drive

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 665; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020665
by Ting Tang 1,2, Hang Jia 1,2, Junyang Li 1,2,*, Jiaxu Wang 1,2 and Xingyu Zeng 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 665; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020665
Submission received: 15 December 2020 / Revised: 3 January 2021 / Accepted: 8 January 2021 / Published: 12 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanical Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see attached pdf document for my comments. My main recommendation is to create a single comprehensive GLOSSARY/LIST OF SYMBOLS for the paper. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The article focuses on the proposal of a model that captures transmission compliance and hysteresis as well as degradation associated with a harmonic drive (HD). The authors have investigated the existing models in-depth and proposed a new model that can possibly enhance the performance of the system. Some clarifications are required from authors before the article can be accepted for final production. Below are my queries:

  1. I feel that the figures can be placed right below the text where they talk about it. For example, when the authors discuss about the results of their proposed model, they put in phrases about Figure 11, 12 etc but they are being organized on a separate page. It would be better if they can rearrange immediately after the texts/phrases to ensure good continuity. This could be done for all figures.
  2. In line 117: the authors provide equations of piecewise linear function based on catalog reference [5]. However, the link provided in bibliography points to a big list of HD’s. Could they provide the exact link of the model considered? It would add more information to the readers.
  3. Eqs. 22 and 23 have no connection with the phrases? Could the authors add more information on how the constants are changed from a to a’ and b to b’?
  4. Could the authors add more information on how they arrived to Eqs. 24 and 25?
  5. Eq. 37: This equation is probably the objective function for the optimization problem. The authors have not discussed in detail how they did the optimization approach, the methodology/tool, the constraints (if any)? This information is important as the authors speak about optimization only in the abstract.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

 

The harmonic drive is studied by a new model considering the transmission compliance and hysteresis and the degradation of teeth is analysed. The identification of parameters is described together with the test rig.

The core of the paper is the identification described in expression (24).

The paper is interesting, but I have some issue:

-Can you evaluate the difference between results from the  model in percentage terms?I mean  about  simulation results of the local elastic coefficient.

  -Figure 5 is superfluous

-English have to be revised

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop