Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Some grammar and syntax editing is needed.

Figure 1 could be improved or removed, is very simple and does not provide significant information.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The article is very well and clearly written.

The goals are clearly marked, the literature is transparent and relatively new, with the exception of older articles, which are nevertheless relevant to the current article.

No unnecessary self-citations are detected, those that are are in the context of the current article.

The topic is very topical, but theoretical modeling of magnetic materials is a complex and nonlinear problem that requires approaches as described in the presented article.

I think the article is of good quality, but perhaps we should still point out the practical applicability of such calculations.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf