Next Article in Journal
Cardiac and Cerebellar Histomorphology and Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate (IP3R) Perturbations in Adult Xenopus laevis Following Atrazine Exposure
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Virgin Microplastics on Growth, Intestinal Morphology and Microbiota on Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides)
Previous Article in Journal
An Investigation into the Effect of Emissions from Industrial Complexes on Air Quality in the Ulsan Metropolitan City Utilizing Trace Components in PM2.5
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prediction and Remediation of Groundwater Pollution in a Dynamic and Complex Hydrologic Environment of an Illegal Waste Dumping Site
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Situ Bioremediation of a Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Plume: A Superfund Site Field Pilot Test

1
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Albuquerque, NM 87113, USA
2
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
3
ECCI, Little Rock, AR 72223, USA
4
Biology Department, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
5
Lynker Technologies, LLC, Leesburg, VA 20175, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(21), 10005; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110005
Submission received: 10 September 2021 / Revised: 21 October 2021 / Accepted: 22 October 2021 / Published: 26 October 2021

Abstract

The North Railroad Avenue Plume, discovered in 1989, contained chlorinated solvent groundwater plumes extending over 23.5 hectares (58 acres) and three hydrostratigraphic units. The source contaminant, tetrachloroethene, stemmed from release at a dry cleaner/laundromat business. The anaerobic biodegradation byproducts trichloroethene, isomers of dichloroethene (DCE), and vinyl chloride were detected in groundwater samples collected prior to remedial action. The impacted aquifers are the sole source drinking water aquifers for the communities near the site. Following the remedial investigation and feasibility study, the selected alternative for full-scale remedial action at the site was enhanced reductive dichlorination (ERD) focused on four treatment areas: the shallow source zone, the shallow hotspot area, the shallow downgradient area, and the deep zone. Pilot testing, which was conducted in the source zone and hotspot areas, is the subject of this paper. The primary objectives of the pilot test were to obtain the necessary information to select an ERD treatment formulation, dose, and frequency of dosing for use during full-scale remedial action, as well as to refine the site’s hydrogeologic conceptual site model and design parameters. Four (4) test cells, each of which contained well pairs of injection and downgradient extraction wells, were used to test ERD bio-amendment formulations: ethyl lactate, dairy whey, emulsified vegetable oil (EVO), and a combination of EVO and a hydrogen gas infusion. A conservative tracer, bromide, was added to the recirculation flow to record tracer breakthrough, peak, and dissipation at extraction wells. The results of these dipole tracer tests were used to reassess the hydraulic conductivity and hydrodynamic dispersity used in the remedial design. In addition to water quality analyses of contaminants and substrates, groundwater samples were also analyzed for biological analyses before, during, and after the addition of bioamendment. Analyses of phospholipid fatty acids and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracts from fresh groundwater samples informed decisions on the capacity for complete ERD without DCE stalling and tracked the shifts in the bacterial and archaeal taxonomy and phylogeny stemming from the addition of bioamendments. The pilot test concluded that EVO was the most suitable, considering (1) support of the native microbial consortia for ERD, (2) mechanics and hydraulics of the remediation system, and (3) sustainability/retention of the substrate in the subsurface. Along with EVO, the addition of a nutrient broth derived from brewery waste accelerated and sustained the desired conditions and microbial diversity and population levels. The pilot test results were also used to assess the utilization kinetics of the injected substrates based on total organic carbon (TOC) concentrations measured in the groundwater. After determining that substrate utilization followed Monod kinetics, a TOC threshold at 300 milligrams per liter, equivalent to approximately twice its half-saturation constant was established. Full scale treatment dosing and dose frequency were designed around this threshold, assuming the maximum substrate utilization would yield optimum ERD.
Keywords: superfund; bioremediation; enhanced reductive dechlorination (ERD); dense nonaqueous-phase liquid (DNAPL); chlorinated hydrocarbons; tetrachloroethene (PCE); trichloroethene (TCE); dichloroethene (DCE); anaerobic reduction; metagenomics superfund; bioremediation; enhanced reductive dechlorination (ERD); dense nonaqueous-phase liquid (DNAPL); chlorinated hydrocarbons; tetrachloroethene (PCE); trichloroethene (TCE); dichloroethene (DCE); anaerobic reduction; metagenomics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guerra, P.; Bauer, A.; Reiss, R.A.; McCord, J. In Situ Bioremediation of a Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Plume: A Superfund Site Field Pilot Test. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10005. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110005

AMA Style

Guerra P, Bauer A, Reiss RA, McCord J. In Situ Bioremediation of a Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Plume: A Superfund Site Field Pilot Test. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(21):10005. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guerra, Peter, Akemi Bauer, Rebecca A. Reiss, and Jim McCord. 2021. "In Situ Bioremediation of a Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Plume: A Superfund Site Field Pilot Test" Applied Sciences 11, no. 21: 10005. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110005

APA Style

Guerra, P., Bauer, A., Reiss, R. A., & McCord, J. (2021). In Situ Bioremediation of a Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Plume: A Superfund Site Field Pilot Test. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10005. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110005

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop