Next Article in Journal
Preliminary Evaluation of Pentacene Field Effect Transistors with Polymer Gate Electret as Ionizing Radiation Dosimeters
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-Aging Effects of Polyoxometalates on Skin
Previous Article in Journal
Unstimulated Parotid Saliva Is a Better Method for Blood Glucose Prediction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multilevel Gene Regulation Using Switchable Transcription Terminator and Toehold Switch in Escherichia coli
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MiR-486-3p and MiR-938—Important Inhibitors of Pacemaking Ion Channels and/or Markers of Immune Cells

1
Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2
Biological Faculty, Department of Human and Animal Physiology, Leninskie Gory 1, Building 2, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Świętej Anny 12, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11366; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311366
Submission received: 4 November 2021 / Revised: 25 November 2021 / Accepted: 26 November 2021 / Published: 1 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Nucleic Acids in Chemistry and Biology)

Abstract

:
The sinus node (SN) is the heart’s primary pacemaker and has a unique expression of pacemaking ion channels and immune cell markers. The role of microribonucleic acids (miRNAs) in control of ion channels and immune function of the sinus node is not well understood. We have recently shown that hsa-miR-486-3p downregulates the main pacemaking channel HCN4 in the SN. In addition, we recently demonstrated that immune cells are significantly more abundant in the SN compared to the right atrium. The aim of this study was to validate the previously predicted interactions between miRNAs and mRNAs of key Ca2+ ion channels (involved in peacemaking) and mRNA of TPSAB1—(a mast cells marker) using luciferase assay. We now show that miR-486 significantly downregulates Cav1.3, Cav3.1, and TPSAB1-mediated luciferase activity, while miR-938 significantly downregulates only TPSAB1-mediated luciferase activity. This makes miR-486-3p a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of SN dysfunctions.

1. Introduction

As part of the cardiac conduction system (CCS), the sinus node (SN) is the primary pacemaker of the heart and is located at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium. The SN is a crescent-shaped structure that extends along the crista terminalis [1,2]. Compared to the surrounding working myocardium, the SN has distinctive molecular and functional properties—owing to its unique expression of ion channels and Ca2+-handling proteins, both responsible for the membrane voltage and Ca2+ clocks—as we have previously described [1].
Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels 1 and 4 (HCN1, HCN4) are the key ion channels responsible for the SN’s myocytes’ diastolic depolarization also known as the pacemaker potential, with HCN4 being the main isoform that is highly expressed in human SN [3,4]. The Cav3.1 ion channel carries the T-type calcium current (ICa,T) at the late diastole phase of the pacemaker potential, and Cav1.3 carries the L-type calcium current (ICa,L) at the upstroke phase of the action potential [3]. We have previously shown that these key ion channels are highly expressed in the human SN, compared to the atrial muscle [1,4]. The SN dysfunction of these ion channels contribute to the development of SN-related rhythm abnormalities such as bradycardia, tachycardia, sinus arrest, etc. [3,5].
Small noncoding RNA molecules (miRNAs) have been extensively studied and are known to regulate the post-transcriptional expression of protein-coding genes, through inhibition [6] by binding to complimentary 3 prime untranslated region (3′UTR) of their target messenger-ribonucleic acids (mRNAs). This regulation plays key roles in the development of cardiac diseases such as cardiac arrhythmia, hypertrophy, fibrosis, and heart failure [7,8,9].
Our previous studies have shown that 18 microRNAs are significantly more experienced, and 48 microRNAs are significantly less expressed in the SN vs. right atrium [1,4]. Among these microRNAs, seven microRNAs (miR-1-3p, miR-30c-5p, miR-133a-3p, miR-429, miR-4220, miR-486-3p, and miR-938) were predicted to inhibit key pacemaking ion channels (HCN1, HCN4, Cav1.3, and Cav3.1) [4], key transcription factors (TFs) (TBX3 and TBX18) [4], a mast cell marker (TPSAB1—a tryptase isoenzyme), and macrophage cell marker CD209 [10], which are significantly more expressed in the SN compared to the right atrium [10]. We have also shown that miR-486-3p reduces the beating rate of rat SN via inhibition of HCN4 [4].
To further our understanding of the SN’s pacemaking and immune response function, the aim of this work was to validate the previously predicted interactions between six miRNAs and key ion channels, transcription factors, immune cell markers, and collagen using luciferase assay experiments. A reduction in bioluminescence indicated that the inhibition of miRNA’s target is taking place. Renilla reporter gene is used to normalize values produced by the luciferase reporter gene. We found that out of the seven microRNAs that are predicted to inhibit key pacemaking channels and mast cell marker, some microRNAs did or did not downregulate their predicted targets.

2. Materials and Methods

Main methods are summarized in Figure 1.

2.1. MiRNAs

MiRNA mimics were ordered from the Dharmacon Cherry Pick library (Horizon Discovery) and arrived in a powder form in a 96-well plate. This was then resuspended in 1X siRNA buffer (diluted from 5X buffer Dharmacon using RNAse-free water). All miRNAs were diluted to a final concentration of 5 µM. Plates were spun down, at a speed of 2000 rpm for 30 s, before adding 20 µL of 1X siRNA buffer to each well and storing at −20 °C. As one of the control experiments, scrambled miRNA (a nonfunctional miRNA) was used.

2.2. Plasmids

Human Cav1.3 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_000720.2; HmiT054373-MT06); HCN4 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_005477.2; HmiT088528-MT06); and TBX18 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_001080508.1; HmiT022062-MT06)—3′UTR-containing plasmids were purchased from GeneCopoeia (Rockville, MD, USA).
Human Cav3.1 (NCBI Reference: NM_001256324.1; HmiT055094-MT06); TPSAB1 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_003294.3; HmiT018221-MT06); TBX3 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_005996.4; HmiT117945-MT06); HCN1 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_021072.4; HmiT117946a-MT06); COL1A1 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_000088.4; HmiT127385-MT06); LZTS1 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_001362884.1; HmiT091521-MT06); LBH (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_030915.4; HmiT127384-MT06); and HLA-DRA (NCBI Reference Sequence: 019111.4; HmiT100191-MT06)—3′UTR-containing plasmids were purchased from LabOmics, UK. The plasmids were delivered in pEZX-MT06 with reporter genes for firefly luciferase and tracking genes for renilla luciferase, in a 30–50 uL solution. A generic vector information provided for all plasmids is shown in Figure 2. Further information regarding predicted interactions between miRNAs and mRNA is shown in in Table 1.

2.3. Plasmid Amplification

In total, 1 µL of plasmid was taken up in 20 µL of supercompetent cells (XL1-Blue, Agilent Technologies) and placed on ice for 3 min before heat-shocking for 30 s. The solution was placed on ice again before spreading 21 µL solution on an agar gel plate (containing carbenicillin) and incubating at 37 °C overnight. Then, a single bacterial colony transfected with the plasmid was added to a solution containing 3 mL sterile LB medium and 3 µL carbenicillin (100 µg/µL) overnight at 37 °C, shaking at a speed of 120 rpm. Following this, 1 mL of the resulting culture was mixed with a solution containing 200 mL LB medium and 200 µL carbenicillin (100 µg/µL) overnight at 37 °C, shaking at a speed of 120 rpm. The remaining 2 mL of culture was added to 200 µL 50% glycerol and stored at −80 °C for future use. The next day, the plasmid DNA was extracted and purified using Purelink Plasmid Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Altrincham, UK), according to manufacturer’s protocol. Concentration of plasmids was determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoScientific, Altrincham, UK). The plasmid concentrations ranged between 0.3 and 2.3 µg/ µL.

2.4. Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay

Rat cardiac H9C2 cells (cell line purchased from ATCC, LGC Limited, Middlesex, UK) were maintained in DMEM (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA) containing 10% feline bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), and 1% nonessential amino acids (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Altrincham, UK). At day 1, cells were plated in 48-well plates at a density of 50,000 cells in a volume of 250 µL of media for 24 h. Following this, the medium was removed and replaced with 225 µL of fresh medium. Cells were transfected with 0.25 µg plasmid (from a 1 µg/µL stock solution) with 1.25 µL miRNA (from a 5 µM stock) in 11 µL of optiMEM (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoScientific, Altrincham, UK) was diluted in optiMEM (0.75 µL lipofectamine 2000 with 11.75 µL optiMEM). Then, the diluted lipofectamine 2000, diluted miRNA, and diluted plasmid were mixed (see Figure 1 for details) and allowed to incubate for 5 min at room temperature before adding to the cells in each well. The cells were then incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h before luciferase activity was measured.
Following this, renilla and luciferase substrate and buffers (Promega) were thawed at room temperature. Here, 1X cell culture lysis was prepared from 5X cell culture lysis reagent (Promega), using milliQ water to dilute. Medium was aspirated from the cells before washing with PBS, and then 50 µL lysis buffer was added and placed on a rocker for 20–25 min. In addition, 10 µL of each lysate was added into a 96-well plate in duplicate for both renilla and luciferase assay readings. A GloMax Luminometer (Promega, Southampton, UK) was set up to inject 50 µL of either luciferase (from injector pump 1) or renilla (from injector pump 2) per well. Luciferase assay activity was normalized to renilla assay activity to obtain a ratio than was then inputted in GraphPad Prism 8. Batches of experiments ranged between 3 and 6.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

In Table 2 and Table 3 and Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 mean ± SEM values are shown. All statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 8. Significant differences were identified using unpaired t test. Significant difference was assumed at p ≤ 0.05.

2.6. Binding Sites Prediction

Genome (https://genome.ucsc.edu accessed on 25 November 2021) was used to obtain the 3′UTR sequence for the target mRNAs. MirBase (https://www.mirbase.org accessed on 25 November 2021) was used to obtain the sequence for the microRNAs. The microRNA sequence and the 3′UTR sequence for their target mRNA were uploaded into RNA22 v2 (https://cm.jefferson.edu/rna22/interactive/ accessed on 25 November 2021) or TargetScan Human (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/ accessed on 25 November 2021) in order to predict the number of binding sites on the mRNAs for their corresponding microRNAs and identify predicted binding sites (Table 1).

3. Results

Out of the 12 hsa-mRNAs that had been predicted to be inhibited by their respective has-miRNAs, we did not observe a significant decrease in luciferase activity with eight hsa-mRNAs and their respective hsa-miRNAs (Table 2). However, we observed a significant decrease in luciferase activity with four hsa-mRNAs and their respective hsa-miRNAs (Table 3, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5), suggesting the presence of interaction between the hsa-mRNAs and hsa-miRNAs. Therefore, we can assume a reduction in the expression of the genes and proteins encoded by these genes, based on these observed interactions.

3.1. Hsa-miR-486-3p Significantly Downregulates Hsa-Cav1.3

Hsa-Cav1.3 is predicted to have six binding sites for hsa-miR-486-3p (Table 1). Hsa-Cav1.3-mediated luciferase activity was significantly reduced by hsa-miR-486-3p when compared to cells transfected with hsa-Cav1.3 and scrambled miR, hsa-miR-486-3p only, or negative control cells (culture media only) (Table 2 and Figure 3).

3.2. Hsa-miR-486-3p Significantly Downregulates Hsa-Cav3.1

Hsa-Cav3.1 is predicted to have one binding site for hsa-miR-486-3p (Table 1). Hsa-Cav3.1-mediated luciferase activity was significantly reduced by hsa-miR-486-3p, when compared to cells transfected with hsa-Cav3.1 and scrambled miR, hsa-miR-486-3p only, or negative control cells (culture media only) (Table 2 and Figure 3).

3.3. Hsa-miR-938 Significantly Downregulates Hsa-Cav1.3

Hsa-Cav1.3 is predicted to have nine binding sites for hsa-miR-938 (Table 1). Hsa-Cav1.3-mediated luciferase activity was significantly reduced by hsa-miR-938, when compared to cells transfected with hsa -Cav1.3 and scrambled miR, hsa-miR-938 only, or negative control cells (culture media only) (Table 2 and Figure 4).

3.4. Hsa-miR-486-3p Significantly Downregulates Hsa-TPSAB1

Hsa-TPSAB1 is a marker for mast cells, involved in immune system regulation, and is predicted to have two binding sites for hsa-miR-486-3p (Table 1). Hsa-TPSAB1-mediated luciferase activity was significantly reduced by hsa-miR-486-3p, when compared to cells transfected with hsa-TPSAB1 and scrambled miR, hsa-miR-486-3p only, or negative control cells (culture media only) (Table 2 and Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Following our previously predicted interactions between key hsa-miRNAs and key hsa-mRNAs [4,10], it was important for us to experimentally verify these predictions. It should be noted that the experimental validation of miRNA-mRNA interaction is still a challenging feat. The reason why some predicted microRNA-mRNA interactions have been confirmed (through observations of significantly reduced bioluminescence/luciferase activity) and some interactions could not be confirmed could be due to several factors such as: thermodynamic stability and binding site accessibility—as recently reviewed by Riolo et. al., 2021 [11].
The current study focuses on two microRNAs (hsa-miR-486-3p and hsa-miR-938) that significantly reduces the luciferase of the mRNAs encoding for Ca2+ ion channels (Cav1.3 and Cav3.1) and a mast cell marker (TPSAB1) in H9C2 cells (Table 3). This suggests that an interaction between these mRNAs and their respective microRNAs is taking place; therefore, this could result in a reduction in expression of Cav1.3, Cav3.1, and TPSAB1.
In our previous study, we have shown that the direct binding of hsa-miR-486-3p to hsa-HCN4 significantly reduces HCN4-mediated luciferase activity and reduces the beating rate in the rat SN preparations [4]. We now provide evidence that hsa-miR-486-3p also significantly downregulates the luciferase activity of mRNAs encoding hsa-Cav1.3, hsa-Cav3.1, and hsa-TPSAB1 (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).

4.1. Hsa-miR-486-3p

Hsa-miR-486-3p is less expressed in the SN, which explains why the pacemaking ion channels and other related transcripts are more expressed in this specialized tissue of the heart [4]. In human SN during heart failure, hsa-miR-486-3p is upregulated [12]. The other predicted targets for hsa-miR-486-3p are hsa-Cav1.3, hsa-Cav3.1, hsa-TPSAB1, hsa-HCN1, hsa-HCN4, LZTS1, LBH, HLA-DRA, and TBX18 [4,10]—all of which we explored through luciferase assay experiments. Interestingly, we observed that hsa-miR-486-3p can significantly reduce the luciferase activity of three key target mRNAs (hsa-Cav1.3, hsa-Cav3.1, and hsa-TPSAB1) (Figure 3 and Figure 5). In acute myocardial infarction patients, their serum hsa-miR-486-3p levels is increased [13,14]. The expression of hsa-miR-486-3p is also elevated during ventricular hypertrophy [15] and in patients with congenital heart diseases [16]. Not only does hsa-miR-486-3p inhibit hsa-TPAB1 (a mast cell marker), it also inhibits hsa-CD209 (a macrophage marker) [10]. We have pilot data that show a trend toward hsa-miR-486-3p inhibiting hsa-CD209 (data not shown). Hulsmans et. al. (2017) noticed a high expression of immune cells in the atrioventricular node (AV) of mice [17]. They also observed AV block and bradycardia in mice that had reduced macrophage expression [17]. Incidentally, severe COVID-19 patients suffer from bradycardia [18,19], and the expression of hsa-miR-486-3p in their blood is increased due to an immune response to the virus [20].
Based on our studies and many other studies described above, hsa-miR-486-3p can be a principal therapeutic target in the treatment of cardiac dysfunction.

4.2. Hsa-Cav1.3 and Hsa-miR-486-3p

Cav1.3 is a voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channel that is important in the regulation of the SN’s pacemaking function. When this channel is deactivated in mice, bradycardia and sinoatrial arrhythmia are observed [21,22]. We have recently shown that hsa-miR-486-3p is predicted to indirectly inhibit hsa-Cav1.3—with hsa-Cav1.3 being predicted to have six binding sites for hsa-miR-486-3p [4]. Our luciferase assay experiment confirms this prediction because the binding of hsa-miR-486-3p significantly reduces hsa-Cav1.3-mediated bioluminescence (Figure 3).

4.3. Hsa-Cav3.1 and Hsa-miR-486-3p

Cav3.1 is a voltage-gated T-type Ca2+ channel that also plays a key role in regulating the pacemaking function of the SN. Mangoni et al. (2006) demonstrated that the knockout of Cav3.1 in mice led to the lack of transitory ICa,T current and slowed down the SN pacemaker activity and AV conduction and reduced their heart rate [23]. We have recently shown that hsa-miR-486-3p is predicted to indirectly inhibit hsa-Cav3.1—with Cav3.1 being predicted to have one binding site for hsa-miR-486-3p [4]. Our luciferase assay experiment confirms this prediction because the binding of hsa-miR-486-3p significantly reduces hsa-Cav3.1-mediated bioluminescence (Figure 3).

4.4. Hsa-TPSAB1 and Hsa-miR-486-3p

In the early phase of myocardial infarction, inflammatory cells migrate to the infarction in order to aid cardiac repair [24]. It has been shown that a dysfunction of the immune and inflammatory pathways may contribute to the development of various cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure and arrhythmia [25,26]. Mast cells are involved in the immune response pathways, and TPSAB1—the main tryptase isoenzyme that is expressed in mast cells—plays a role in immunity [27].
Tryptase is the enzymatic activator of membrane protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2)—a receptor that is expressed by cardiomyocytes [28]. These PAR-2 receptors are connected to ERF kinases that mediate survival and hypertrophic signals. It could be assumed that hsa-miR-486-3p suppresses the tryptase/PAR-2/ERK hypertrophy pathway in the SN, preventing myocyte hypertrophy and therefore supporting the SN’s spindle-like neonatal-like morphology. In addition, tryptase belong to the serine proteases family [29], and they all have very conservative 3-UTRs with a unique secondary structure that is crucial to mRNA stability.
We recently reported that hsa-TPSAB1 is significantly expressed in the adult human SN and is predicted to be directly inhibited by hsa-miR-486-3p [10]. The function of TPSAB1 in the SN is unknown, but it is interesting to see its high expression in the SN. The binding of hsa-miR-486-3p significantly reduces hsa-TPSAB1-mediated bioluminescence (Figure 5). It is possible that the immune system is important for maintaining the pacemaking function of the human SN. A high expression of hsa-miR-486-3p in the blood plasma of COVID-19 patients [20] could result in the reduced expression of hsa-TPSAB1 and abnormal functioning of immune cells in the SN. Based on this information, hsa-miR-486-3p could be a promising target in the treatment of bradycardia that is experienced by COVID-19 patients [18,19].
The high expression of immune cells in the SN could slow down the development of effective biological pacemakers. It has been supposed that immune cells contribute to SN functioning. For example, Hu et al. (2014) reported that when an adenoviral vector of TBX18 was delivered to a swine model of total heart block, it affected not only the heart rhythm but also caused an immune response [30].

4.5. Hsa-miR-938

We have previously reported that hsa-miR-938 is one of the novel microRNAs that is uniquely expressed in the human right atrium and is predicted to inhibit Cav1.3 [4]. Now, following our luciferase assay experiments, we observed a significant decrease in the luciferase activity of the mRNA encoding for Cav1.3 when hsa-miR-938 is added (Figure 4). This observation suggests there is interaction between hsa-Cav1.3 and hsa-miR-938. The function of this microRNA in the cardiovascular system is unknown, but this microRNA is known to promote cell proliferation [31] and is linked to the development of gastric [32] and pancreatic cancer [33].

5. Conclusions

With the growing occurrence of cardiovascular disease, particularly sinus node dysfunction (SND), as the global ageing population increases, it is important for us to identify new therapeutic targets and to further understand the complex mechanisms that regulate the SN’s pacemaking function. We hereby provide novel insights into the interacting between key microRNAs and ion channels and immune cell markers in H9C2 cells by further exploring our previous predicted interactions (as described in Petkova et al. (2020) [4] and Aminu et al. (2021) [10]). Using luciferase assay experiments, our observation of significant reduction of luciferase activity suggests there is interaction between miR-486-3p and three mRNAs (Cav1.3, Cav3.1, and TPSAB1) and between miR-938 and Cav1.3 mRNA. These observations allow room for further explorations of how these microRNAs can be used for ex vivo and in vivo experiments to study their effect on cardiac function/dysfunction, as previously shown by Yanni et al., who injected an antimiR to miR-370 into heart failure mice and restored HCN4 mRNA and protein expression in the SN, thus increasing the beating rate [34], and recently by Petkova et al., who injected miR-486-3p into the rat SN tissue and observed a reduced heart rate [4].

Author Contributions

Methodology, manuscript planning, writing and editing, data curation and analysis, and creating and formatting figures and tables, A.J.A. (Abimbola J Aminu); methodology, data curation, and analysis for Cav1.3, M.P.; methodology and manuscript editing, W.C.; methodology, Z.Y.; manuscript editing, V.S.K.; supervision, A.J.A. (Andrew J Atkinson); conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, manuscript planning, data analysis, figures and tables formatting, and manuscript review and editing, H.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the BRITISH HEART FOUNDATION, grant number FS/17/67/33483 and the Leducq Foundation (THE FANTACY 19CVD03).

Data Availability Statement

All data related to this study is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the technical support provided by Gabrielle Forte and Cali Anderson from Alicia D’Souza’s research group, University of Manchester.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Chandler, N.J.; Greener, I.D.; Tellez, J.O.; Inada, S.; Musa, H.; Molenaar, P.; DiFrancesco, D.; Baruscotti, M.; Longhi, R.; Anderson, R.H.; et al. Molecular architecture of the human sinus node insights into the function of the cardiac pacemaker. Circulation 2009, 119, 1562–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Stephenson, S.R.; Atkinson, A.; Kottas, P.; Perde, F.; Jafarzadeh, F.; Bateman, M.; Iaizzo, P.A.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Anderson, R.H.; et al. High resolution 3-dimensional imaging of the human cardiac conduction system from microanatomy to mathematical modeling. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dobrzynski, H.; Anderson, R.H.; Atkinson, A.; Borbas, Z.; D’Souza, A.; Fraser, J.F.; Inada, S.; Logantha, S.J.; Monfredi, O.; Morris, G.; et al. Structure, function and clinical relevance of the cardiac conduction system, including the atrioventricular ring and outflow tract tissues. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 139, 260–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Petkova, M.; Atkinson, A.J.; Yanni, J.; Stuart, L.; Aminu, A.J.; Ivanova, A.D.; Pustovit, K.B.; Geragthy, C.; Feather, A.; Li, N.; et al. Identification of Key Small Non-Coding MicroRNAs Controlling Pacemaker Mechanisms in the Human Sinus Node. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2020, 9, e016590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, H.; Holden, A.V.; Kodama, I.; Honjo, H.; Lei, M.; Varghese, T.; Boyett, M. Mathematical models of action potentials in the periphery and center of the rabbit sinoatrial node. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2000, 279, H397–H421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thum, T.; Galuppo, P.; Kneitz, S.; Fiedler, J.; Van Laake, L.; Mummery, C.; Ertl, G.; Bauersachs, J. WITHDRAWN: MicroRNAs in the Human Heart: A Clue to Fetal Gene Reprogramming in Heart Failure. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2007, 17, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boettger, T.; Braun, T. A new level of complexity the role of micrornas in cardiovascular development. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 1000–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Romaine, S.P.R.; Tomaszewski, M.; Condorelli, G.; Samani, N.J. MicroRNAs in cardiovascular disease: An introduction for clinicians. Heart 2015, 101, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Torrente, A.G.; Mesirca, P.; Neco, P.; Rizzetto, R.; Dubel, S.; Barrere, C.; Sinegger-Brauns, M.; Striessnig, J.; Richard, S.; Nargeot, J.; et al. L-type Cav1.3 channels regulate ryanodine receptor-dependent Ca2+release during sino-atrial node pacemaker activity. Cardiovasc. Res. 2016, 109, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Aminu, A.J.; Petkova, M.; Atkinson, A.J.; Yanni, J.; Morris, A.D.; Simms, R.T.; Chen, W.; Yin, Z.; Kuniewicz, M.; Holda, M.K.; et al. Further insights into the molecular complexity of the human sinus node—The role of ‘novel’ transcription factors and microRNAs. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2021, 166, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Riolo, G.; Cantara, S.; Marzocchi, C.; Ricci, C. miRNA Targets: From Prediction Tools to Experimental Validation. Methods Protoc. 2020, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, N.; Artiga, E.; Kalyanasundaram, A.; Hansen, B.J.; Webb, A.; Pietrzak, M.; Biesiadecki, B.; Whitson, B.; Mokadam, N.A.; Janssen, P.M.L.; et al. Altered microRNA and mRNA profiles during heart failure in the human sinoatrial node. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hsu, A.; Chen, S.-J.; Chang, Y.-S.; Chen, H.-C.; Chu, P.-H. Systemic Approach to Identify Serum microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Acute Myocardial Infarction. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 418628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, R.; Lan, C.; Pei, H.; Duan, G.; Huang, L.; Li, L. Expression of circulating miR-486 and miR-150 in patients with acute myocardial infarction. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2015, 15, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lange, S.; Banerjee, I.; Carrion, K.; Serrano, R.; Habich, L.; Kameny, R.; Lengenfelder, L.; Dalton, N.; Meili, R.; Börgeson, E.; et al. miR-486 is modulated by stretch and increases ventricular growth. JCI Insight 2019, 4, 125507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mukai, N.; Nakayama, Y.; Murakami, S.; Tanahashi, T.; I Sessler, D.; Ishii, S.; Ogawa, S.; Tokuhira, N.; Mizobe, T.; Sawa, T.; et al. Potential contribution of erythrocyte microRNA to secondary erythrocytosis and thrombocytopenia in congenital heart disease. Pediatr. Res. 2018, 83, 866–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hulsmans, M.; Clauss, S.; Xiao, L.; Aguirre, A.D.; King, K.R.; Hanley, A.; Hucker, W.J.; Wülfers, E.M.; Seemann, G.; Courties, G.; et al. Macrophages Facilitate Electrical Conduction in the Heart. Cell 2017, 169, 510–522.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Amaratunga, E.A.; Corwin, D.S.; Moran, L.; Snyder, R. Bradycardia in Patients With COVID-19: A Calm Before the Storm? Cureus 2020, 12, e8599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Capoferri, G.; Osthoff, M.; Egli, A.; Stoeckle, M.; Bassetti, S. Relative bradycardia in patients with COVID-19. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 27, 295–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tang, H.; Gao, Y.; Li, Z.; Miao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Liu, X.; Xie, L.; Li, H.; Wen, W.; Zheng, Y.; et al. The noncoding and coding transcriptional landscape of the peripheral immune response in patients with COVID-19. Clin. Transl. Med. 2020, 10, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Platzer, J.; Engel, J.; Schrott-Fischer, A.; Stephan, K.; Bova, S.; Chen, H.; Zheng, H.; Striessnig, J. Congenital Deafness and Sinoatrial Node Dysfunction in Mice Lacking Class D L-Type Ca2+ Channels. Cell 2000, 102, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Song, H.; Rodriguez, J.; Tuteja, D.; Namkung, Y.; Shin, H.-S.; Chiamvimonvat, N. Functional roles of Cav1.3 (alpha1D 3) calcium channel in sinoatrial nodes. Circ. Res. 2002, 90, 981–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mangoni, M.E.; Traboulsie, A.; Leoni, A.L.; Couette, B.; Marger, L.; Le Quang, K.; Kupfer, E.; Cohen-Solal, A.; Vilar, J.; Shin, H.-S. Bradycardia and slowing of the atrioventricular conduction in mice lacking Cav3.1/alpha(1G) T-type calcium channels. Circ. Res. 2006, 98, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zimmer, A.; Bagchi, A.K.; Vinayak, K.; Bello-Klein, A.; Singal, P.K. Innate immune response in the pathogenesis of heart failure in survivors of myocardial infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2019, 316, H435–H445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Swirski, F.K.; Nahrendorf, M. Cardioimmunology: The immune system in cardiac homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 733–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lazzerini, P.E.; Laghi-Pasini, F.; Boutjdir, M.; Capecchi, P.L. Cardioimmunology of arrhythmias: The role of autoimmune and inflammatory cardiac channelopathies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 19, 63–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lyons, J.; Yu, X.; Hughes, J.D.; Le, Q.T.; Jamil, A.; Bai, Y.; Ho, N.; Zhao, M.; Liu, Y.; O’Connell, M.; et al. Elevated basal serum tryptase identifies a multisystem disorder associated with increased TPSAB1 copy number. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1564–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Antoniak, S.; Sparkenbaugh, E.M.; Tencati, M.; Rojas, M.; Mackman, N.; Pawlinski, R. Protease activated receptor-2 conrtibutes to heart failure. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, C.; Darrow, A.L.; Qi, J.S.; D’Andrea, M.R.; Andrade-Gordon, P. A novel serine protease predominantely expressed in macrophages. Biochem. J. 2003, 374, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hu, Y.-F.; Dawkins, J.F.; Cho, H.C.; Marbán, E.; Cingolani, E. Biological pacemaker created by minimally invasive somatic reprogramming in pigs with complete heart block. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 245ra94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, C.-F.; Li, Y.-C.; Jin, J.-P.; Yan, Z.-K.; Li, D.-D. miR-938 promotes colorectal cancer cell proliferation via targeting tumor suppressor PHLPP2. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 807, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, Y.; Jia, Z.; Cao, D.; Wang, C.; Wu, X.; You, L.; Wen, S.; Pan, Y.; Cao, X.; Jiang, J. Predictive Value of MiR-219-1, MiR-938, MiR-34b/c, and MiR-218 Polymorphisms for Gastric Cancer Susceptibility and Prognosis. Dis. Markers 2017, 2017, 4731891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cao, Z.; Feng, M.; Yang, G.; Zhang, T. Plasma miRNAs Effectively Distinguish Patients with Pancreatic Cancer from Controls: A Multicenter Study. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2017, 225, e125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yanni, J.; D’Souza, A.; Wang, Y.; Li, N.; Hansen, B.J.; Zakharkin, S.O.; Smith, M.; Hayward, C.; Whitson, B.A.; Mohler, P.J.; et al. Silencing miR-370-3p rescues funny current and sinus node function in heart failure. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Summary of main methods. H9C2, a rat cardiomyoblast cell line; OptiMEM (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA), minimal essential medium; and miRNA, microribonucleic acid. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Summary of main methods. H9C2, a rat cardiomyoblast cell line; OptiMEM (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA), minimal essential medium; and miRNA, microribonucleic acid. Created with BioRender.com.
Applsci 11 11366 g001
Figure 2. Generic vector map for all human plasmids used. SV40, Simian Virus 40 promoter; CMV, cytomegalovirus; hLuc, Firefly luciferase reporter gene. Modified from GeneCopoeia (Rockville, MD, USA) and LabOmics, Nivelles, Belgium.
Figure 2. Generic vector map for all human plasmids used. SV40, Simian Virus 40 promoter; CMV, cytomegalovirus; hLuc, Firefly luciferase reporter gene. Modified from GeneCopoeia (Rockville, MD, USA) and LabOmics, Nivelles, Belgium.
Applsci 11 11366 g002
Figure 3. Luciferase bioluminescence after transfection of H9C2 cells with hsa-miR-486-3p and plasmids. Bioluminescence was recorded 24 h after transfecting H9C2 cells with 0.25 µg of (A) Cav1.3′- or (B) Cav3.1—3′-untranslated region-containing plasmid and 1.25 µL hsa-miR-486-3p or scrambled hsa-miRNA. Two control groups did not include the luciferase reporter gene, and cells were transfected with only hsa-miR-486-3p or remained untransfected (i.e., contained an equivalent volume of culture medium to replace the hsa-miRNAs or 3′-untranslated region-containing plasmid). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 batches of experiments were plotted for Cav1.3; n = 6 batches of experiments were plotted for Cav3.1; * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.005).
Figure 3. Luciferase bioluminescence after transfection of H9C2 cells with hsa-miR-486-3p and plasmids. Bioluminescence was recorded 24 h after transfecting H9C2 cells with 0.25 µg of (A) Cav1.3′- or (B) Cav3.1—3′-untranslated region-containing plasmid and 1.25 µL hsa-miR-486-3p or scrambled hsa-miRNA. Two control groups did not include the luciferase reporter gene, and cells were transfected with only hsa-miR-486-3p or remained untransfected (i.e., contained an equivalent volume of culture medium to replace the hsa-miRNAs or 3′-untranslated region-containing plasmid). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 batches of experiments were plotted for Cav1.3; n = 6 batches of experiments were plotted for Cav3.1; * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.005).
Applsci 11 11366 g003
Figure 4. Luciferase bioluminescence after transfection of H9C2 cells with hsa-miR-938 and hsa-Cav1.3. Bioluminescence was recorded 24 h after transfecting H9C2 cells with 0.25 µg of hsa-Cav1.3—3′-untranslated region-containing plasmid and 1.25 µL hsa-miR-938 or scrambled miRNA. Two control groups did not include the luciferase reporter gene, and cells were transfected with only hsa-miR-938 or remained untransfected (i.e., contained an equivalent volume of culture medium to replace the miRNAs or Cav1.3). Data are shown as mean ± SEM shown (n = 3 batches of experiments; *** p ≤ 0.0010).
Figure 4. Luciferase bioluminescence after transfection of H9C2 cells with hsa-miR-938 and hsa-Cav1.3. Bioluminescence was recorded 24 h after transfecting H9C2 cells with 0.25 µg of hsa-Cav1.3—3′-untranslated region-containing plasmid and 1.25 µL hsa-miR-938 or scrambled miRNA. Two control groups did not include the luciferase reporter gene, and cells were transfected with only hsa-miR-938 or remained untransfected (i.e., contained an equivalent volume of culture medium to replace the miRNAs or Cav1.3). Data are shown as mean ± SEM shown (n = 3 batches of experiments; *** p ≤ 0.0010).
Applsci 11 11366 g004
Figure 5. Luciferase bioluminescence after transfection of H9C2 cells with hsa-miR-486-3p and hsa-TPSAB1. Bioluminescence was recorded 24 h after transfecting H9C2 cells with 0.25 µg of hsa-TPSAB1 3′-untranslated region-containing plasmid and 1.25 µL has-miR-486-3p or scrambled miRNA. Two control groups did not include the luciferase reporter gene, and cells were transfected with only hsa-miR-486-3 or remained untransfected (i.e., contained an equivalent volume of culture medium to replace the miRNAs or hsa-TPSAB1). Data are shown as mean ± SEM shown (n = 3 batches of experiments; * p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5. Luciferase bioluminescence after transfection of H9C2 cells with hsa-miR-486-3p and hsa-TPSAB1. Bioluminescence was recorded 24 h after transfecting H9C2 cells with 0.25 µg of hsa-TPSAB1 3′-untranslated region-containing plasmid and 1.25 µL has-miR-486-3p or scrambled miRNA. Two control groups did not include the luciferase reporter gene, and cells were transfected with only hsa-miR-486-3 or remained untransfected (i.e., contained an equivalent volume of culture medium to replace the miRNAs or hsa-TPSAB1). Data are shown as mean ± SEM shown (n = 3 batches of experiments; * p ≤ 0.05).
Applsci 11 11366 g005
Table 1. Predicted microRNA-mRNA interactions. MicroRNA expression data are based on our previous studies [4,10]. Significant change in the expression of mRNA and microRNA is classed as p ≤ 0.05. Red represents significantly more expressed mRNA in the SN vs. right atrium. Green represents significantly less expressed microRNA in the SN vs. right atrium. HCN1, HCN4, Cav1.3, and Cav3.1 are pacemaking ion channels (see text for details); LZTS1, LBH, TBX3, and TBX18 are transcription factors; COL1A1 is a collagen marker; TPSAB1 is a mast cell marker; HLA-DRA is histocompatibility complex marker; and CD209 is a macrophage cell marker. N = no; Y = yes; Hsa = homosapien.
Table 1. Predicted microRNA-mRNA interactions. MicroRNA expression data are based on our previous studies [4,10]. Significant change in the expression of mRNA and microRNA is classed as p ≤ 0.05. Red represents significantly more expressed mRNA in the SN vs. right atrium. Green represents significantly less expressed microRNA in the SN vs. right atrium. HCN1, HCN4, Cav1.3, and Cav3.1 are pacemaking ion channels (see text for details); LZTS1, LBH, TBX3, and TBX18 are transcription factors; COL1A1 is a collagen marker; TPSAB1 is a mast cell marker; HLA-DRA is histocompatibility complex marker; and CD209 is a macrophage cell marker. N = no; Y = yes; Hsa = homosapien.
Hsa-miRNAHsa-miRNA SequencePredicted Target mRNANumber of Binding Sites for Hsa-miRNA on Hsa-mRNA
Hsa-miR-1-3pUGGAAUGUAAAGAAGUAUGUAUHCN11
HCN41
TBX31
Hsa-miR-30c-5pUGUAAACAUCCUACACUCUCAGCHCN11
HCN41
COL1A10
Hsa-miR-486-3pCGGGGCAGCUCAGUACAGGAUHCN16
HCN47
Cav3.11
Cav1.36
LZTS112
LBH1
TPSAB12
HLA-DRA2
CD2091
Hsa-miR-133a-3pUUUGGUCCCCUUCAACCAGCUGHCN45
COL1A11
TPSAB11
Hsa-miR-938UGCCCUUAAAGGUGAACCCAGUCav1.39
LBH1
Hsa-miR-429UAAUACUGUCUGGUAAAACCGUTBX181
Hsa-miR-422aACUGGACUUAGGGUCAGAAGGCTBX31
Table 2. Nonsignificant downregulation of hsa-mRNAs by hsa-miRNAs in H9C2 cells, observed following luciferase assay experiments. Mean ± SEM values are shown. Red represents significantly more expressed mRNA in the SN vs. right atrium whereas green represents significantly less expressed microRNA in the SN vs. right atrium, as shown in our previous publications [4,10].
Table 2. Nonsignificant downregulation of hsa-mRNAs by hsa-miRNAs in H9C2 cells, observed following luciferase assay experiments. Mean ± SEM values are shown. Red represents significantly more expressed mRNA in the SN vs. right atrium whereas green represents significantly less expressed microRNA in the SN vs. right atrium, as shown in our previous publications [4,10].
Hsa-miRNAPredicted Target hsa-mRNAHsa-miRNA Plus
hsa-mRNA Mean ± SEM
Scrambled hsa-miRNA Plus hsa-mRNA
Mean ± SEM
Hsa-miRNA No mRNA
Mean ± SEM
No hsa-miRNA and No hsa-mRNA
(Negative Control)
Mean ± SEM
Hsa-miR-1-3pHCN10.789 ± 0.2050.686 ± 0.211--
HCN40.558 ± 0.1440.422 ± 0.103--
TBX30.686 ± 0.2440.586 ± 0.189--
Hsa-miR-30c-5pHCN10.955 ± 0.2480.686 ± 0.211--
HCN4
COL1A1
0.689 ± 0.024
0.800 ± 0.232
0.422 ± 0.103
0.626 ± 0.292
-
-
-
-
Hsa-miR-486-3pHCN10.554 ± 0.1570.686 ± 0.2110.593 ± 0.3440.580 ± 0.313
LZTS10.326 ± 0.1780.556 ± 0.1780.707 ± 0.3980.589 ± 0.310
LBH0.343 ± 0.1420.604 ± 0.2280.7065 ± 0.3980.589 ± 0.310
HLA-DRA0.672 ± 0.2280.944 ± 0.3590.593 ± 0.3440.580 ± 0.313
Hsa-miR-133a-3pHCN40.457 ± 0.1110.422 ± 0.103--
COL1A1
TPSAB1
0.334 ± 0.094
0.814 ± 0.300
0.542 ± 0.186
0.743 ± 0.372
0.255 ± 0.126
0.255 ± 0.126
0.666 ± 0.369
0.6666 ± 0.369
Hsa-miR-938LBH0.276 ± 0.1090.575 ± 0.1900.081 ± 0.0350.093 ± 0.024
Hsa-miR-429TBX180.593 ± 0.0480.558 ± 0.229--
Hsa-miR-422aTBX30.512 ± 0.1710.586 ± 0.179--
Table 3. Significant downregulation of hsa-mRNAs by hsa-miRNAs in H9C2 cells, observed following luciferase assay experiments. Mean ± SEM values are shown. Red represents significantly more expressed mRNA in the SN vs. right atrium, whereas green represents significantly less expressed miRNA in the SN vs. right atrium, as shown in our previous publications [4,10]. p values are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Table 3. Significant downregulation of hsa-mRNAs by hsa-miRNAs in H9C2 cells, observed following luciferase assay experiments. Mean ± SEM values are shown. Red represents significantly more expressed mRNA in the SN vs. right atrium, whereas green represents significantly less expressed miRNA in the SN vs. right atrium, as shown in our previous publications [4,10]. p values are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Hsa-miRNAPredicted Target hsa-mRNAHsa-miRNA Plus
hsa-mRNA Mean ± SEM
Scrambled hsa-miRNA Plus hsa-mRNA
Mean ± SEM
Hsa-miRNA No mRNA
Mean ± SEM
No hsa-miRNA and No hsa-mRNA
(Negative Control)
Mean ± SEM
Hsa-miR-486-3pCav3.10.511 ± 0.1111.188 ± 0.281 0.596 ± 0.3440.567 ± 0.318
Cav1.30.211 ± 0.0390.449 ± 0.019 0.057 ± 0.0200.083 ± 0.026
TPSAB11.049 ± 0.2562.240 ± 0.032 0.593 ± 0.3440.580 ± 0.313
Hsa-miR-938Cav1.30.159 ± 0.0250.449 ± 0.0190.074 ± 0.0200.087 ± 0.020
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aminu, A.J.; Petkova, M.; Chen, W.; Yin, Z.; Kuzmin, V.S.; Atkinson, A.J.; Dobrzynski, H. MiR-486-3p and MiR-938—Important Inhibitors of Pacemaking Ion Channels and/or Markers of Immune Cells. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11366. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311366

AMA Style

Aminu AJ, Petkova M, Chen W, Yin Z, Kuzmin VS, Atkinson AJ, Dobrzynski H. MiR-486-3p and MiR-938—Important Inhibitors of Pacemaking Ion Channels and/or Markers of Immune Cells. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(23):11366. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aminu, Abimbola J, Maria Petkova, Weixuan Chen, Zeyuan Yin, Vlad S Kuzmin, Andrew J Atkinson, and Halina Dobrzynski. 2021. "MiR-486-3p and MiR-938—Important Inhibitors of Pacemaking Ion Channels and/or Markers of Immune Cells" Applied Sciences 11, no. 23: 11366. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311366

APA Style

Aminu, A. J., Petkova, M., Chen, W., Yin, Z., Kuzmin, V. S., Atkinson, A. J., & Dobrzynski, H. (2021). MiR-486-3p and MiR-938—Important Inhibitors of Pacemaking Ion Channels and/or Markers of Immune Cells. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11366. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop