Next Article in Journal
Properties and Colorimetric Performance of Screen-Printed Thermochromic/UV-Visible Fluorescent Hybrid Ink Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Efficacy of a Novel Optimized Tuned Mass Damper for Minimizing Dynamic Responses of Cantilever Beams
Previous Article in Journal
Silica-Based Composites with Enhanced Rheological Properties Thanks to a Nanosized Graphite Functionalized with Serinol Pyrrole
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Novel MRE Adaptive Seismic Isolator Using Curvelet Transform Identification

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11409; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311409
by Wael A. Altabey 1,2, Mohammad Noori 3,*, Zele Li 1,*, Ying Zhao 1, Seyed Bahram Beheshti Aval 4, Ehsan Noroozinejad Farsangi 5,*, Ramin Ghiasi 1 and Ahmed Silik 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11409; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311409
Submission received: 27 October 2021 / Revised: 10 November 2021 / Accepted: 12 November 2021 / Published: 2 December 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The results are good. While there is no description of mechanisms at the level of individual magnetic particles, this approach is quite possible.

Shown good effect of adding MWCNTs to MRE

The mechanism for the effectiveness of MWCNTs when added to the MRE is not discussed

Very long article, one may be  shorten

Author Response

Responses to Reviewers’ Requests:

 

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author

The results are good. While there is no description of mechanisms at the level of individual magnetic particles, this approach is quite possible.

Shown good effect of adding MWCNTs to MRE

The mechanism for the effectiveness of MWCNTs when added to the MRE is not discussed

Very long article, one may be shorten

Response: the manuscript is revised based on respected reviewer’s comment.

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper presents a study about magnetorheological elastomeric material as candidate for designing seismic isolators. The study has been made by using the curvelet technique to assess the reliability of the material under investigation. 

The paper is interesting, well written and presented and it deserves to be accounted for publication. Some comments are reported in the attached PDF.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Responses to Reviewers’ Requests:

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author

The paper presents a study about magnetorheological elastomeric material as candidate for designing seismic isolators. The study has been made by using the curvelet technique to assess the reliability of the material under investigation.

The paper is interesting, well written and presented and it deserves to be accounted for publication. Some comments are reported in the attached PDF.

I suggest to reduce the length of abstract. It seems to be large

Response: the abstract has the important description of the present work, and due to the several methods discussed in paper the abstract seems to be long, but the total words are 310 words which  is within the acceptable range of applied sciences journal.

Despite the above sentence, I suggest to mention at least two or three works about the application to MRE in civil applications.

Response: the references 17, 18, 19, 21 are works related to the application of MRE in structures and civil applications.

Also for introduction, I suggest to reduce the length.

Response: the manuscript introduces several methods and the introduction covers the background on  all these methods, we tried to reduce the paper, however, we realized that unfortunately if we do too much reduction, the main objectives of the paper will not be understood.  Nevertheless, we made some reduction.

Figure 2, please, re-edit figures and include subcaptions in the caption. In addition, why do not the curves start from 0-0?

Response: We made the modifications, thanks for the suggestion.  It should be clear that the value of strain is equal to 0 at stress level of 0 MPa.

In Equation 15, maybe a list of symbols is necessary

Response: the symbols definitions are stated now above or in Figure 6.

In Figure 12, which software did you use?

Response: ANSYS.  It is now stated.

Figure 12, Please, re-edit figures and include subcaptions in the caption. In addition.

Response: Modified.

 

Back to TopTop