Next Article in Journal
Measuring Polarization in Online Debates
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Mid-Infrared Energy Conversion of a Doubly Resonant Optical Parametric Oscillator Using Aperiodically Poled Lithium Niobate
Previous Article in Journal
Placental mRNA and Protein Expression of VDR, CYP27B1 and CYP2R1 Genes Related to Vitamin D Metabolism in Preeclamptic Women
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Diode Pumped Middle Infrared Laser Based on Ho: GdVO4 Crystal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mid-Infrared Multispectral Gaseous Stimulated Raman Scattering Laser

1
Key Laboratory of Chemical Lasers, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
School of Science, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(24), 11875; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411875
Submission received: 16 November 2021 / Revised: 8 December 2021 / Accepted: 12 December 2021 / Published: 14 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Middle Infrared (Mid-IR) Lasers and Their Application)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Advances in Middle Infrared (Mid-IR) Lasers and Their Application.

Abstract

We demonstrated mid-infrared gaseous stimulated Raman scattering lasers in free space. Mixed gases of hydrogen and deuterium were used as Raman gain media in one Raman cell. Pumped by laser pulses at 1064 nm, the first Stokes Raman components at 1560 nm and 1907 nm were generated. A four-wave mixing process with the pump laser at 1064 nm and Raman lasers at 1560 nm and 1907 nm contributed to dramatically reducing the threshold of mid-IR laser generation at 4432 nm. The maximum output peak power of a mid-IR laser at 4432 nm reached 121 kW. Furthermore, by scattering on the rotational transition of deuterium, multispectral mid-IR Raman lasers at wavelengths of 2071 nm, 2266 nm, 2604 nm, 2920 nm, 3322 nm, 3743 nm, 4432 nm, and 5431 nm were also generated. Our results show that this is a convenient method to reduce the threshold and achieve a high power output with mid-IR Raman lasers.

1. Introduction

Mid-infrared (mid-IR) laser sources in the range of 2–6 μm have important applications for atmospheric sounding, the detection of organic gaseous pollutants, biomedical surgery, defense technology, gas detection, and higher harmonics generation technology [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) process is an effective method of broadening the laser spectral range and generating new wavelength lasers [9,10,11]. It is very convenient to realize the down–conversion of laser frequencies and achieve a mid-IR Raman laser output by the SRS process. By using solid-state materials as Raman gain media, mid-IR lasers have been widely studied and reported [12,13]. Large gain coefficients and the high thermal conductivity of solid crystals can be beneficial to realizing a high conversion efficiency with mid-IR Raman lasers. However, the development of high-energy Raman laser output is limited by the absorption of crystals in the mid-IR range and the low optical damage threshold. Moreover, the Raman shifts of solid crystals are about 1000 cm−1, which is not large enough to generate wide-ranging mid-IR Raman lasers. Gas Raman gain media in hollow-core fiber (HCF) have also been demonstrated to generate mid-IR Raman lasers, but the strong loss of silica over wavelengths of 5 μm limits the generation of silica anti-resonant hollow-core fiber Raman lasers [14,15,16,17,18]. With a much higher damage threshold, gaseous Raman media in free space can withstand large pump energy. However, it is very hard to generate mid-IR Raman lasers due to the low Raman gain of gaseous media.
In this work, we reported the generation of mid-IR multispectral gaseous Raman lasers in free space by using a mixed gas of hydrogen (H2) and deuterium (D2) as the Raman gain medium. The four-wave mixing (FWM) process contributed to dramatically reducing the threshold of mid-IR Raman laser generation. A 4432 nm Raman laser with a peak power of 121 kW was obtained, and multispectral mid-IR Raman lasers at wavelengths of 2071 nm, 2266 nm, 2604 nm, 2920 nm, 3322 nm, 3743 nm, 4432 nm, and 5431 nm were also generated.

2. Experimental Setup

The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. A Q-switched solid-state Nd:YAG laser (Nimma-900, Beamtech Optronics Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) at 1064 nm was used as the pump source. The laser beam divergence angle was approximately 0.5 mrad, and the beam diameter was approximately 9 mm. The pulse width was 9 ns, and the repetition rate used in this experiment was 1 Hz. The output beam passed through a half-wave plate (HWP) and a polarizing beam splitter prism (PBSP). The pump power could be adjusted continuously by rotating the HWP. Then, the linearly polarized pump laser passed through a quarter-wave plate (QWP) and turned to the circular polarization. The pump laser was focused into a Raman cell through a convex lens L1 with focal length of 2 m. The Raman cell, created from a 4 m stainless steel tube and two calcium fluoride (CaF2) windows, was filled with a mixed gas of 0.4 MPa H2 and 2.0 MPa D2 of 99.995% purity.
The SRS and FWM processes occurred in the Raman cell, and a series of mid-IR Raman lasers were generated and separated by a CaF2 lens L2, a CaF2 prism and a slit. Photographic paper was used to locate the burn marks of Raman components with different wavelengths, as shown in the inset of Figure 1. The spectra and waveform of the output Raman lasers were detected by a monochromator (Micro HR MHRA-2A-MS, HORIBA, Beijing, China) and a photoelectric probe (PVI-2TE-4, VIGO System, Ozarow Mazowiecki, Poland), and the laser pulse energy was detected by an energy meter (QE25LP-S-MB-D0, GENTEC-EO, Beijing, China).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. High-Power Mid-IR Laser at 4432 nm

In the Raman cell, with a 1064 nm laser pump, the SRS processes occurred in the mixture of H2 and D2 gases. When the pump laser was scattered on the vibrational transitions of H2 with a Raman shift of Ω R v i b ( H 2 ) = 4155   cm 1 , the first Stokes (S1) at 1907 nm was generated. Similarly, when the pump laser was scattered on the vibrational transitions of D2 with a Raman shift of Ω R v i b ( D 2 ) = 2987   cm 1 , the first Stokes (S1) at 1560 nm and the second Stokes (S2) at 2920 nm was generated.
With the generation of 1560 nm and 1907 nm Raman lasers, FWM processes could occur in the Raman cell. A mid-IR Raman laser at 4432 nm would be obtained by the FWM process of the pump laser at 1064 nm, and Raman lasers at 1560 nm and 1907 nm. The scheme of the FWM process is shown in Figure 2.
According to Bjorklund’s research, the generated power of a 4432 nm laser by the FWM process above can be given by [19,20]:
P 4 = B p 2 P 1 P 2 P 3 exp ( b | Δ k | )
where B is a constant; p is the gas pressure in the Raman cell; b is the laser confocal parameter; P 1 , P 2 , P 3 are the powers of the pump laser at 1064 nm, and the Raman lasers at 1560 nm and 1907 nm, separately; and Δk is the wave-vector mismatch caused by the dispersion of the Raman medium. In this case, the wave-vector mismatch Δ k can be defined as:
Δ k = k 1 + k 2 k 3
where k 1 and k 2 are the wave vectors of the Raman lasers at 1560 nm and 1907 nm, separately, and k 3 is the wave vector of the pump laser at 1064 nm.
According to the Equation (1), the output power of a mid-IR laser at 4432 nm is proportional to a product of the output powers of the pump laser at 1064 nm, and Raman lasers at 1560 nm and 1907 nm, so the generation of a mid-IR laser at 4432 nm by the FWM process has no threshold. After generating a 4432 nm laser seed, it could be further amplified by the SRS process in the Raman cell. In comparison with the cascade SRS process, this work provided a much easier method to achieve a mid-IR laser output.
In the Raman cell, due to the high Raman gain coefficient of the vibrational transitions, high-energy Raman lasers at 1560 nm, 1907 nm, and 2920 nm could be obtained by the SRS process in the mixture of H2 and D2 gases. The output powers of different Raman components were investigated and are shown in Figure 3. Had the SRS process occurred in a different gas pressure of Raman media, the conversion efficiencies of Raman components would be influenced greatly [21,22]. To obtain high-energy mid-IR Raman laser output, the FWM process should be matched well by adjusting the partial pressure of H2 and D2 in the Raman cell. As shown in Figure 3a, while the 1064 nm laser pumped the mixed gas of 0.4 MPa H2 and 2.0 MPa D2, the output energies of the S1 Raman lasers at 1560 nm and 1907 nm were approximately equal at their highest conversion efficiencies. Similar output energies would contribute to generating a mid-IR laser at 4432 nm by the FWM process and the SRS amplification process. By slightly increasing the partial pressure of H2 to 0.5 MPa, the output energy of the S1 Raman laser at 1907 nm could reach a higher level than the S1 Raman laser at 1560 nm of D2, as shown in Figure 3b, which resulted in the suppression of Raman conversion at 1560 nm and 2920 nm of D2. This condition was unfavorable for the generation of mid-IR Raman lasers. In the same experimental conditions, the output energy of the mid-IR laser at 4432 nm generated by the mixed gas of 0.5 MPa H2 and 2.0 MPa D2 was too weak to be recorded by an energy meter.
Furthermore, according to Equations (1) and (2), it could be found that the wave-vector mismatch Δ k should be satisfied to generate a mid-IR laser by the FWM process. Ishaaya’s research concluded that phase-matching conditions would be influenced by focus conditions [23]. While a lens of a short focal length is used to focus the pump laser into Raman cells, at the focus, the numerical aperture is relatively large, so the maximum angle between the pump laser and Raman lasers may be large enough to satisfy the wave-vector match [24]. In this case, a mid-IR laser is easily generated by the FWM process. However, the power density would be so high that the laser pulses could ionize Raman media at the focus, and the laser-induced breakdown would deteriorate the conversion of Raman lasers [25]. On the other hand, while a lens of long focal length is used to focus the pump laser, at the focus, the numerical aperture is small, and the maximum angle between the pump and Stokes waves may be too small to satisfy the wave-vector match. In this case, the FWM process is limited, and it is hard to generate a mid-IR laser. In our study, by using a lens with a focal length longer than 2 m, the mid-IR laser at 4432 nm could not be observed.
In summary, compared with cascade SRS, the FWM process could dramatically reduce the threshold of mid-IR Raman laser generation. By further SRS amplification, a mid-IR 4432 nm laser achieved high peak power output. The SRS process of the vibrational first Stokes Raman laser of H2 pumped by a 1560 nm laser contributed to the amplification, and the SRS process of the vibrational first Stokes Raman laser of D2 pumped by a 1907 nm laser was also conducive to it. The waveform of the 4432 nm laser was recorded and is shown in Figure 4a. Due to the pulse compression of the SRS process, the pulse width of the 4432 nm laser was smaller than the pump laser, which was only 2.8 ns. The output power of the mid-IR laser at 4432 nm is also shown in Figure 4b. It can be seen that the maximum output peak power reached 121 kW, pumped by the laser at 1064 nm with a pulse energy of 431 mJ and linewidth of 1 cm−1. However, the output energy of the 4432 nm laser would decay due to the laser-induced breakdown mentioned above when the pump energy was beyond 440 mJ.

3.2. 2–6 μm Multispectral Mid-IR Raman Laser

With the generation of high-energy Raman components at wavelengths of 1907 nm, 2920 nm, and 4432 nm, these Raman lasers could be used as pump sources and scattered on the rotational transition of D2 with Raman shift of Ω R r o t ( D 2 ) = 415   cm 1 . The circular polarization of the pump laser could contribute to reducing the threshold of the rotational Raman scattering of D2 [26,27]. Thus, pumped by the laser at 1064 nm with a pulse energy of 431 mJ, multispectral mid-IR Raman lasers in the range of 2–6 μm could be generated as: the first Stokes at 2071 nm and the second Stokes at 2266 nm, pumped by a 1907 nm laser; the first Stokes at 3322 nm and the first anti-Stokes at 2604 nm, pumped by a 2920 nm laser; the first Stokes at 5431 nm and the first anti-Stokes at 3743 nm, pumped by a 4432 nm laser. The spectra of the mid-IR Raman lasers are shown in Figure 5, and the SRS processes generating all the mid-IR Raman components in the range of 2–6 μm are shown in Table 1.
In this work, by using a CaF2 prism, the output mid-IR Raman lasers could be dispersed, and a slit could be used to select a specific wavelength that we would need in these mid-IR Raman lasers. Furthermore, some previous studies showed that it would be possible to finely tune the frequencies of Raman lasers by using wavelength-tunable laser sources, or with a tunable seed injection [28,29].
In our experiment, it is possible to generate the second Stokes laser at 9.2 μm. However, our experimental condition makes the detection of 9.2 μm very difficult. First, the optical conversion efficiency of 9.2 μm is expected to lead to limitations. Even if it has a similar photon conversion efficiency to a D2 second Stokes (2.92 μm) Raman laser, the 9.2 μm Raman laser would have much lower energy due to large quantum deficiency. Furthermore, a CaF2 exit window and prism were used in this experiment. CaF2 has strong absorption at 9.2 μm, and this will further decrease energy of a 9.2 μm laser. Output Raman lasers were dispersed by a prism, focused by a CaF2 lens, with a burn mark used to know the exact position of the Raman line before the energy of the Raman laser was measured. However, in our experiment, even if a 9.2 μm Raman laser was generated, it would still be very difficult to obtain the burn mark, and, consequently, the energy of the 9.2 μm Raman laser could not be measured. In fact, if the second Stokes laser at 9.2 μm is expected to be generated, a pure hydrogen and linear polarization pump laser should be used, and a Herriot multiple pass Raman configuration will also benefit the generation of a 9.2 μm Raman laser.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have first demonstrated multispectral mid-IR gaseous Raman lasers in free space in the range of 2–6 μm by using a mixture of H2 and D2 as Raman gain medium. A high-power 1064 nm laser was used to pump the vibrational transitions of H2 and D2 to generate the first Stokes Raman components at wavelengths of 1560 nm and 1907 nm. The FWM process of 1064 nm, 1560 nm, and 1907 nm lasers was carried out and reduced the threshold of mid-IR Raman laser generation. With further SRS amplification, a 4.4 μm Raman laser was obtained and a maximum peak power of 121 kW was achieved. Furthermore, the smaller Raman shift of the rotational transition of D2 contributed to generating more mid-IR Raman components. Theoretically, by using a multipass Raman cell with a longer gain length and selecting an active gas mixture, mid-IR Raman lasers with more spectra and a wider wavelength range can be obtained, and even far-infrared Raman lasers can be generated by this method.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S., X.C. and T.Z.; methodology, C.S. and T.Z.; formal analysis, D.L.; investigation, Y.J.; data curation, D.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.S.; writing—review and editing, J.G. and J.L.; funding acquisition, C.S. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (22073101) and the Innovation Foundation of Key Lab of Chemical Laser of Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (KLCL-20S09).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vodopyanov, K.L. Laser-Based Mid-Infrared Sources and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Walsh, B.M.; Lee, H.R.; Barnes, N.P. Mid infrared lasers for remote sensing applications. J. Lumin. 2016, 169, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jackson, S. Towards high-power mid-infrared emission from a fibre laser. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Werle, P.; Slemr, F.; Maurer, K.; Kormann, R.; Mücke, R.; Jänker, B. Near- and mid-infrared laser-optical sensors for gas analysis. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2002, 37, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gandolfi, M.; Tognazzi, A.; Rocco, D.; de Angelis, C.; Carletti, L. Near-unity third-harmonic circular dichroism driven by quasi-bic in asymmetric silicon metasurfaces. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2102.08027. [Google Scholar]
  6. Koshelev, K.; Tang, Y.; Li, K.; Choi, D.-Y.; Li, G.; Kivshar, Y. Nonlinear Metasurfaces Governed by Bound States in the Continuum. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1639–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pitruzzello, G.; Krauss, T.F. Photonic crystal resonances for sensing and imaging. J. Opt. 2018, 20, 073004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tognazzi, A.; Rocco, D.; Gandolfi, M.; Locatelli, A.; Carletti, L.; De Angelis, C. High Quality Factor Silicon Membrane Metasurface for Intensity-Based Refractive Index Sensing. Optics 2021, 2, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, D.J.; Yang, G.L.; Chen, F.; Xie, J.J.; Zhang, L.M.; Guo, J.; Shao, C.L.; Peng, Z.Q.; Lu, Q.P. Stimulated rotational Raman scattering at multiwavelength under tea CO2 laser pumping with a multiple-pass cell. Laser Phys. 2012, 22, 937–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Supradeepa, V.R.; Nichsolson, J.W.; Headley, C.E.; Yan, M.F.; Palsdottir, B.; Jakobsen, D. A high efficiency architecture for cascaded Raman fiber lasers. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 7148–7155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, C.; Cai, X.; Sang, Y.; Zheng, T.; Li, Z.; Liu, D.; Liu, W.; Guo, J. Investigation of multispectral SF6 stimulated Raman scattering laser. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2020, 18, 051402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sabella, A.; Piper, J.A.; Mildren, R.P. Diamond Raman laser with continuously tunable output from 3.38 to 3.80 μm. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 4037–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheng, P.; Zhao, J.; Xu, F.; Zhou, X.; Wang, G. Diode-pumped mid-infrared YVO4 Raman laser at 2418 nm. Appl. Phys. A 2017, 124, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Z.; Huang, W.; Cui, Y.; Wang, Z. Efficient mid-infrared cascade Raman source in methane-filled hollow-core fibers operating at 28 μm. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 4671–4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gladyshev, A.V.; Kosolapov, A.F.; Khudyakov, M.; Yatsenko, Y.P.; Kolyadin, A.; Krylov, A.A.; Pryamikov, A.D.; Biriukov, A.S.; Likhachev, M.E.; Bufetov, I.A.; et al. 4.4-μm Raman laser based on hollow-core silica fibre. Quantum Electron. 2017, 47, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gladyshev, A.V.; Kosolapov, A.F.; Khudyakov, M.M.; Yatsenko, Y.P.; Kolyadin, A.N.; Krylov, A.A.; Pryamikov, A.D.; Biriukov, A.S.; Likhachev, M.E.; Bufetov, I.A. 2.9, 3.3, and 3.5 μm raman lasers based on revolver hollow-core silica fiber filled by 1H2/D2 gas mixture. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2018, 24, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Dasa, M.K.; Adamu, A.I.; Antonio-Lopez, J.E.; Habib, S.; Correa, R.A.; Bang, O.; Markos, C. High pulse energy and quantum efficiency mid-infrared gas Raman fiber laser targeting CO2 absorption at 4.2 µm. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 1938–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, S.-F.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Ding, W.; Jiang, D.-L.; Gu, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, P. Hollow-core conjoined-tube negative-curvature fibre with ultralow loss. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Björklund, G. Effects of focusing on third-order nonlinear processes in isotropic media. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1975, 11, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kleinman, D.A.; Ashkin, A.; Boyd, G.D. Second-Harmonic Generation of Light by Focused Laser Beams. Phys. Rev. 1966, 145, 338–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bloembergen, N.; Bret, G.; Lallemand, P.; Pino, A.; Simova, P. Controlled stimulated Raman amplification and oscillation in hydrogen gas. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1967, 3, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chu, Z.; Singh, U.N.; Wilkerson, T.D. Multiple stokes wavelength generation in H2, D2, and CH4 for lidar aerosol measurements. Appl. Opt. 1991, 30, 4350–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ben Yehud, L.; Belker, D.; Ravnitzki, G.; Ishaaya, A.A. Competition between stimulated Raman and Brillouin scattering processes in CF_4 gas. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boyd, R. Nonlinear Optics, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yagi, T.; Huo, Y. Laser-induced breakdown in H2 gas at 248 nm. Appl. Opt. 1996, 35, 3183–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Minck, R.W.; Hagenlocker, E.E.; Rado, W.G. Stimulated Pure Rotational Raman Scattering in Deuterium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1966, 17, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perrone, M.R.; Piccinno, V.; De Nunzio, G.; Nassisi, V. Dependence of rotational and vibrational Raman scattering on focusing geometry. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1997, 33, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, W.; Li, Z.; Cui, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Z. Efficient, watt-level, tunable 1.7 µm fiber Raman laser in H2-filled hollow-core fibers. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 475–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shen, C.; Cai, X.; Su, X.; Zheng, T.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Jia, Y.; Liu, D.; Guo, J. Wavelength-tunable narrow-linewidth gaseous Raman laser. Appl. Opt. 2021, 60, 5465–5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup. The inset shows the burn marks of Raman components with different wavelengths.
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup. The inset shows the burn marks of Raman components with different wavelengths.
Applsci 11 11875 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the mid-IR 4432 nm Raman laser generation by FWM.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the mid-IR 4432 nm Raman laser generation by FWM.
Applsci 11 11875 g002
Figure 3. Output power of Raman components of (a) mixed gas of 0.4 MPa H2 and 2.0 MPa D2; (b) mixed gas of 0.5 MPa H2 and 2.0 MPa D2.
Figure 3. Output power of Raman components of (a) mixed gas of 0.4 MPa H2 and 2.0 MPa D2; (b) mixed gas of 0.5 MPa H2 and 2.0 MPa D2.
Applsci 11 11875 g003
Figure 4. Pulse shape (a) and energy conversion curve (b) of the mid-IR laser at 4432 nm.
Figure 4. Pulse shape (a) and energy conversion curve (b) of the mid-IR laser at 4432 nm.
Applsci 11 11875 g004
Figure 5. Mid-IR spectra of the Raman lasers generated by the 1064 nm laser pump for the mixture of H2 and D2 gases.
Figure 5. Mid-IR spectra of the Raman lasers generated by the 1064 nm laser pump for the mixture of H2 and D2 gases.
Applsci 11 11875 g005
Table 1. The mid-IR Raman components generated by each SRS process.
Table 1. The mid-IR Raman components generated by each SRS process.
WavelengthSRS Process
2071 nm ω 1907   nm Ω R r o t ( D 2 )
2266 nm ω 1907   nm 2 Ω R r o t ( D 2 )
2604 nm ω 2920   nm + Ω R r o t ( D 2 )
2920 nm ω 1064   nm 2 Ω R v i b ( D 2 )
3322 nm ω 2920   nm Ω R r o t ( D 2 )
3743 nm ω 4432   nm + Ω R r o t ( D 2 )
4432 nm ω 1064   nm Ω R v i b ( D 2 ) Ω R v i b ( H 2 )
5431 nm ω 4432   nm Ω R r o t ( D 2 )
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, C.; Cai, X.; Zheng, T.; Jia, Y.; Liu, D.; Liu, J.; Guo, J. Mid-Infrared Multispectral Gaseous Stimulated Raman Scattering Laser. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11875. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411875

AMA Style

Shen C, Cai X, Zheng T, Jia Y, Liu D, Liu J, Guo J. Mid-Infrared Multispectral Gaseous Stimulated Raman Scattering Laser. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(24):11875. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411875

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Chencheng, Xianglong Cai, Tiancheng Zheng, Yuxi Jia, Dong Liu, Jinbo Liu, and Jingwei Guo. 2021. "Mid-Infrared Multispectral Gaseous Stimulated Raman Scattering Laser" Applied Sciences 11, no. 24: 11875. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411875

APA Style

Shen, C., Cai, X., Zheng, T., Jia, Y., Liu, D., Liu, J., & Guo, J. (2021). Mid-Infrared Multispectral Gaseous Stimulated Raman Scattering Laser. Applied Sciences, 11(24), 11875. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411875

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop