Around-View-Monitoring-Based Automatic Parking System Using Parking Line Detection
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The issue is not new but this study is reliable. The article fits into the discussion about the automatic parking system.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer
Thank you for your review again.
We are uploading (a) an updated manuscript with indicating changes, and (b) a clean updated manuscript without highlights (PDF main document).
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Yun Hee Lee
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper illustrates a parking assistance system that uses 360 ° cameras, through which parking lines are identified. The innovative aspect consists in the recognition mode of the parking lines through the top view, with a line filter and verification through the convutional neural network. It follows the planning and monitoring of the automatic movement of the vehicle.
The system was tested in an experimental environment using a test vehicle, with three different types of slots: perpendicular, parallel and inclined. The number of tests (820) appears to be adequate, as well as the level of accuracy (95%).
The results are certainly interesting, although the research must be interesting with the implementation of algorithms to determine the presence of obstacles and improve accuracy through the object detection function.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer
Thank you for your review again.
We are uploading our point-by-point response to the comments that included (a) an updated manuscript with indicating changes, and (b) a clean updated manuscript without highlights (PDF main document).
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Yun Hee Lee
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
This paper is progressing well, however it is a little wordy and written in a report format.
Please review the following for my general remarks and suggestions:
- It is recommended to add a paragraph at the end of the introduction section which clearly demonstrates the layout of the paper stating the following sections providing a brif explanation of each subsection. This will give a chance to reader to have an overview of the remainder of the paper.
- It would be beneficial if the authors expanded the related works in section 2.
- Adding another section at the end of the paper after the conclusion which discusses the limitation of the current study as well as presenting some suggestions for future research is highly recommended.
- Please have a native speaker proofread the whole text for language, punctuation, and grammar.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer
Thank you for your review again.
We are uploading our point-by-point response to the comments that included (a) an updated manuscript with indicating changes, and (b) a clean updated manuscript without highlights (PDF main document).
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Yun Hee Lee
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 4 Report
- The literature review should be improved. The author should summarize the advantages and disadvantages of related methods and compared their methods with the existing methods.
- The experimental scenario is too simple, it's better to choose a more complex scene, such as other vehicles.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer
Thank you for your review again.
We are uploading our point-by-point response to the comments that included (a) an updated manuscript with indicating changes, and (b) a clean updated manuscript without highlights (PDF main document).
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Yun Hee Lee
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 4 Report
The authors have addressed all the concerns, I'm satisfied to accept this paper.