Next Article in Journal
Phytochemicals Block Glucose Utilization and Lipid Synthesis to Counteract Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Collective Memory: Transposing Pavlov’s Experiment to Robot Swarms
Previous Article in Journal
Zero-Dynamics Attack on Wind Turbines and Countermeasures Using Generalized Hold and Generalized Sampler
Previous Article in Special Issue
Accelerating Emergence of Aerial Swarm
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Software Architecture for Autonomous and Coordinated Navigation of UAV Swarms in Forest and Urban Firefighting

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031258
by Ángel Madridano 1,*, Abdulla Al-Kaff 1, Pablo Flores 2, David Martín 1 and Arturo de la Escalera 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031258
Submission received: 17 December 2020 / Revised: 26 January 2021 / Accepted: 27 January 2021 / Published: 29 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Swarm Robotics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper addresses software architecture for autonomous navigation of UAV swarm. This is a big paper that includes many issues. As a result, the length of paper is too long. 

One concern is embedded software. How can the authors implement all software algorithm including trajectory planning, smoothing and decision making algorithms? It may requires very expensive computation power. Do you intend to use cloud for computation? How can you distribute the computation? That is my major concern. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting paper with a practice application scenario. I have the following comments:

- the authors need to revise the abstract completely. Currently it has too many background information, and little technical information about the paper. You should summarise the challenges of the application, your approach and novelties and a brief summary of your many results. 

-Regarding the layers 3 and 4, it is not clear when the system uses the centralized, decentralized or RL methods for avoiding obstacles.
- Related to the previous point, what happens if one UAV loses the connection with the swarm, is the architecture able to maintain a centralized and decentralized configuration at the same time. This point needs to be clarified.
- The RL based method has been trained and validated with two open environments, it is recommended to work with more complex environments.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop