Next Article in Journal
Widely Wavelength-Tunable High Power Single-Longitudinal-Mode Fiber Laser in Mid-Infrared Waveband
Next Article in Special Issue
Users’ Reaction Time for Improvement of Security and Access Control in Web Services
Previous Article in Journal
How to Correctly Detect Face-Masks for COVID-19 from Visual Information?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advanced Data Mining of SSD Quality Based on FP-Growth Data Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/app11052072
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Protected Network Architecture for Ensuring Consistency of Medical Data through Validation of User Behavior and DICOM Archive Integrity

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 2072; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052072
by Shamil Magomedov * and Artem Lebedev
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Igor Perko
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 2072; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052072
Submission received: 23 January 2021 / Revised: 16 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data: Advanced Methods, Interdisciplinary Study and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The architecture of analytical clusters is to improve the functionality of SIEM environments deployed in hospitals. The system proposed in this paper is designed specifically to allow integration of validation of medical data itself and user behavior analytics to validate medical specialists’ activity.

The problem this paper addressing is important and the motivation is strong.

However, the over presentation could be further improved in multiple aspects such as the image quality, the table illustration, and the overall explanation on each of the components.

The overall contribution is also limited due to the limited system evaluation considering this is system work. Also, what is the designing contribution other than the implementation for the system would also worth paying attention to. How the novel architecture could help other future works would be a question worth answering.

It would be great the authors could better position the contribution and the value of this specific system and proposal to contribute to the domain.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Please do invoke a thesaurus for ALL the abbreviations (even if involving well know standards as DICOM)

Please clarify the boundaries of the examined issues adequately, maybe in the introduction or/and in the discussion

protecting who? Is it the patient, the storage system, the data manager? Which threats are to be addressed? By whom should the threats be executed?

Is it a centralised system, where are the data stored, in a single organisation, by the data manager, on the patient's device? Who owns the data, who is the manager?

Are we discussing manual data analysis by an specialist, or big data predictive modelling? Are the concepts the same? Is the data the same?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop