Next Article in Journal
Multi-Metal Distribution Patterns in Soils of the Sacramento River Floodplain and Their Controlling Factors
Next Article in Special Issue
Explainable-AI in Automated Medical Report Generation Using Chest X-ray Images
Previous Article in Journal
Measurement of Quasiparticle Diffusion in a Superconducting Transmon Qubit
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sample-Efficient Deep Learning Techniques for Burn Severity Assessment with Limited Data Conditions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Efficient Deep Learning Approach for Colon Cancer Detection

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8450; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178450
by Ahmed S. Sakr 1, Naglaa F. Soliman 2,*, Mehdhar S. Al-Gaashani 3, Paweł Pławiak 4,5, Abdelhamied A. Ateya 6 and Mohamed Hammad 7,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8450; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178450
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 20 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Medical Image Analysis and Computer-Aided Diagnosis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The answers to the comments are attached in the following pdf file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This article “An Efficient Deep Learning Approach for Colon Cancer Detection” by Sakr etc. reports a deep learning approach to analyze input histopathological images for colon cancer detection. There are some questions that need to be addressed before this article can be considered for publication.

1. In Figure 1, it’s better to number the normal images and images with colon cancer, e.g., colon_n_1, colon_n_2, …, colon_aca_1, colon_aca_2, …, so that these images can be clearly referred.

2. The display of Figure 4 is terrible. The texts are too small. It is hard to for the readers to get the key information.

3. In Figure 5, the texts are small and unclear. The label of the Y axis is very blurry.

4. In Table 3, it seems that Tongacar et al. has achieved an accuracy of 99.69% and Yildirim and Cinar et al. has reached 99.75%. In comparison, this paper reports an accuracy of 99.50%. But in the abstract, the authors stated that “The result analysis demonstrates that the proposed deep model for colon cancer detection provides the result with higher accuracy of 99.50% which is considered the best accuracy compared with other deep learning approaches”. It seems that 99.50% cannot be considered to be the best.

5. The grammar of the whole manuscript needs to be checked before publication.

Author Response

The answers to the comments are attached in the following pdf file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

No questions.

Back to TopTop