Next Article in Journal
A Novel Constant Power Factor Loop for Stable V/f Control of PMSM in Comparison against Sensorless FOC with Luenberger-Type Back-EMF Observer Verified by Experiments
Previous Article in Journal
Superpixel Image Classification with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Learnable Positional Embedding
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 18
10.3390/app12189177
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Refined Test and Evaluation Method of Side Viewing Angle of LED Display Module

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(18), 9177; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189177
by Shuo Huang 1,2, Xifeng Zheng 1,3,*, Fengxia Liu 1,2, Hui Cao 3 and Xinyue Mao 1,3
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(18), 9177; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189177
Submission received: 28 August 2022 / Revised: 7 September 2022 / Accepted: 10 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors approach in the article a method of testing and evaluating the lateral viewing angle of the LED display module. In my opinion, the fort point of the manuscript is the comparison with the ability of visualize of the human eyes.

The paper is suitable for this journal, but in my opinion, it must be improved in some parts of the study before accepted.

1. The introduction could be more explicit and respectively supplemented with bibliographic references in the field of medical eyes and LED display.

2. The link between the part of the text where the mathematical aspects are referred not is highlighted in relation to the numerical value of the equation. (An example equation 2 has no explicit reference in the text above it).

3. The text of Line 159-161 should be reformulated and correlated with both the formula referred in Line (7) and grammatical aspects. The same aspects Line 182 to 185.

4. Given the required model of writing such a study, the last two parts must be completed and corrected. ( Author Contributions, Funding, Data Availability Statement, Acknowledgments, Conflicts of Interest, References).

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

It is an interesting paper.

I have minor suggestions:

1) The authors should better explain the optical details of the luminance meters;

2) there are several misprints. "0.0005cd/m2" should be  "0.0005 cd/m^2". I recommend more accuracy in reporting values.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop