Next Article in Journal
Special Issue on Contaminants in Coastal Environments: From the Sediment-Water Interface to the Trophic Chain
Previous Article in Journal
A Parallel Robotic Antenna Design for Downlinking Leo Satellite Signal Subject to Wind Disturbance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Level of Fidelity of an Actuator Line Model in Predicting Loads and Deflections of Rotating Blades under Uniform Free-Stream Flow
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Scalability of Mach Number Effects on Noise Emitted by Side-by-Side Propellers

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9507; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199507
by Caterina Poggi †, Giovanni Bernardini *,†, Massimo Gennaretti and Roberto Camussi
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9507; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199507
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 9 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 22 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aerodynamic Aeroelasticity and Aeroacoustics of Rotorcraft)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A minor revision is need before This paper can be received and published on Applied Sciences, the comments are as follows:

1 What is the definition of Δ OASPL shown in Fig,3?

2 The layout of the titles in Figures should be improved.

3 Is the calculated results need to be verified with experiment results? 

Author Response

See attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript reports a numerical work about the scalability of Mach number effects on noise emitted by side-by-side propellers due to the different Mach numbers operated in the experiments and actual applications. The authors adopt BEM based on incompressible, potential flows and the Farassat 1A formulation of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings equation to evaluate the acoustic emission of the propellers. 

 

While the work is interesting and has significant contributions for the Distributed Electric Propulsion, the manuscript suffers some major shortcomings, so I cannot recommend their publications. Details are as follows.

 

  1. Missing mesh and surface information

In the manuscript, the information about the chosen surface and the meshes are all missed. Where and how are the surfaces chosen? What are meshes adopted for the integration? It is important for readers to know these technical details of the modelling.  

 

  1. Missing grid convergence study

Grid convergence study is an important step to show the credibility of the models. It must be included in the manuscripts. 

 

  1. Missing parts in methodology

 

In Line 143, how the surface velocity is evaluated? Could the authors please describe some of its details? It is because this velocity is essential in evaluating the noise emission.

 

 

Author Response

See attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop