Next Article in Journal
CPAM: Cross Patch Attention Module for Complex Texture Tile Block Defect Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Model-Based Design of Induction Motor Control System in MATLAB
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two-Stage Adaptive Large Neighbourhood Search for Team Formation and Worker Assignment Problems in Cellular Manufacturing Systems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/app122311958
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Enhancing Antifragile Performance of Manufacturing Systems through Predictive Maintenance

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 11958; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311958
by Oana Chenaru, Stefan Mocanu *, Radu Dobrescu and Maximilian Nicolae
Reviewer 1:
Mohammed Alnahhal
Reviewer 2:
Fubin Yang
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 11958; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311958
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 20 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Management of Serviceability Products and Systems, Smart Industrial and Manufacturing Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

please see the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached pdf file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The submission to be considered for publication in the journal reports enhancement of antifragile performance of manufacturing systems through predictive maintenance. Overall, the paper might give some inspirations from a different point of view on this topic. Some suggestions are provided for the authors' consideration.

1. The keywords section should be improved.

2. Literature review is insufficient. An updated and complete literature review should be conducted to present the state-of-the-art and knowledge gaps of the research with strong relevance to the topic of the paper.

3. The conclusions drawn are very generic and insignificant. This part seems a summary.

4. The validation methods should be introduced in detail.

Author Response

Please see the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

There are some comments that we hope can help improve the quality of the manuscript.

1.     Please highlight the contribution of this article.

2.     The background section seems to be too redundant. Please simplify it.

3.     Please revise the layout of the paper to make it more comfortable to read.

4.     The Figure 4 is not clear enough. Please modify it to make it more concise.

5.     Is there a simulation experiment to verify the proposed method?

Author Response

Please see the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Most of points mentioned in the first round were not taken into consideration in the current version. Only very few minor changes were added

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Please find the answers to your observations and suggestions in the attached file. Also, a revised version of the manuscript will be uploaded.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The reviewer didn's see response to the fourth question.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Please find reply to observation #4 in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

My concerns have been responded well.

Author Response

Thank you for your efforts and suggestions

Back to TopTop