Next Article in Journal
Special Issue on New Insights into Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue on Geotechnical Engineering Hazards
Previous Article in Journal
Usefulness of Potentially Probiotic L. lactis Isolates from Polish Fermented Cow Milk for the Production of Cottage Cheese
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Critical Investigation on the Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability of EPB Machines: A Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Selection Techniques for Estimating Building Response

by
Tariq A. Aquib
1,*,
Jayalakshmi Sivasubramonian
2 and
P. Martin Mai
1
1
Earth Science and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
2
Ècole Centrale College of Engineering, Mahindra University, Hyderabad 500043, Telangana, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 12089; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312089
Submission received: 8 September 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geotechnical Engineering Hazards)

Abstract

The structural response of buildings to earthquake shaking is of critical importance for seismic design purposes. Research on the relationship between earthquake ground motion intensity, building response, and seismic risk is ongoing, but not yet fully conclusive. Often, probability demand models rely on one ground motion intensity measure (IM) to predict the engineering demand parameter (EDP). The engineering community has suggested several IMs to account for different ground motion characteristics, but there is no single optimal IM. For this study, we compile a comprehensive list of IMs and their characteristics to assist engineers in making an informed decision. We discuss the ground motion selection process used for dynamic analysis of structural systems. For illustration, we compute building responses of 2D frames with different natural period subjected to more than 3500 recorded earthquake ground motions. Using our analysis, we examine the effects of different structural characteristics and seismological parameters on EDP-IM relationships by applying multi-regression models and statistical inter-model comparisons. As such, our results support and augment previous studies and suggest further improvements on the relationship between EDP and IM in terms of efficiency and sufficiency. Finally, we provide guidance on future approaches to the selection of both optimal intensity measures and ground motions using newer techniques.
Keywords: ground motion; intensity measures; structural response; inter-story drift ratio; correlation; performance-based earthquake engineering ground motion; intensity measures; structural response; inter-story drift ratio; correlation; performance-based earthquake engineering

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aquib, T.A.; Sivasubramonian, J.; Mai, P.M. Analysis of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Selection Techniques for Estimating Building Response. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 12089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312089

AMA Style

Aquib TA, Sivasubramonian J, Mai PM. Analysis of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Selection Techniques for Estimating Building Response. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(23):12089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aquib, Tariq A., Jayalakshmi Sivasubramonian, and P. Martin Mai. 2022. "Analysis of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Selection Techniques for Estimating Building Response" Applied Sciences 12, no. 23: 12089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312089

APA Style

Aquib, T. A., Sivasubramonian, J., & Mai, P. M. (2022). Analysis of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Selection Techniques for Estimating Building Response. Applied Sciences, 12(23), 12089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop