Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Pedological Impact of Local Anesthesia Dental Simulator as Serious Game
Previous Article in Journal
A Sun-Tracking Algorithm for Satellite-Borne Spectrometers Based on the Orbital Motion Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Torsion Test vs. Other Methods to Obtain the Shear Strength of Elastic-Plastic Adhesives

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(7), 3284; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073284
by Monica Ferraris 1,2, Milena Salvo 1,2, Valentina Casalegno 1,2, Stefano De La Pierre 1,2, Luca Goglio 2,3 and Alessandro Benelli 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(7), 3284; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073284
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 18 March 2022 / Accepted: 21 March 2022 / Published: 23 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanical Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors submitted a good good, although some issues require attention. Please see my enclosed PDF report with comments and issue that require improvement.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is interesting and fits with the scope of journal. Minor comments are reported below.

1)The reviewer suggests to improve the quality of abstract.

2) The reviewer suggests to improve the description of the experimetal procedure. The test where performed in displacement or force control? At which rate? Which testing machine? Etc...

3) The reviewer suggests to introduce some photos of experimental tests.

4)The reviewer suggests to expand the characterization of adhesive joints in the introduction. See below

  • Modelling of a GFRP adhesive connection by an imperfect soft interface model with initial damage. Composite Structures 239 (2020) 112034
  •  Cyclic behaviour modelling of GFRP adhesive connections by an imperfect soft interface model with damage evolution. Composite Structures 279 (2022) 114741

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I am happy with the modifications

Back to TopTop