Next Article in Journal
Computational Characterization of Turbulent Flow in a Microfluidic Actuator
Next Article in Special Issue
A Reliable Way to Improve Electrochemical Migration (ECM) Resistance of Nanosilver Paste as a Bonding Material
Previous Article in Journal
BFE-Net: Bidirectional Multi-Scale Feature Enhancement for Small Object Detection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Characteristics of Copper Foil Three-Electrode Planar Spark Gap High Voltage Switch Integrated with EFI
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Sparse Weighting for Pyramid Pooling-Based SAR Image Target Recognition

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(7), 3588; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073588
by Shaona Wang *, Yang Liu and Linlin Li
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(7), 3588; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073588
Submission received: 4 March 2022 / Revised: 26 March 2022 / Accepted: 29 March 2022 / Published: 1 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optoelectronic Materials, Devices, and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A very well written paper. It is also technically sound and presents new research results with a very important goal – the use of SPM and SR for the detection of targets in SAR images. I've few suggestion/corrections to improve the quality of the paper: 1. On line 27, “…in understanding and interpretation of SAR images.” should be changed to “…in understanding and interpreting SAR images.” 2. On line 48, please define these acronyms SIFT and HOG 3. If you substitute Eqn (4) into Eqn(5), optimization problem will not be well defined. Please correct Eqn (5) 4. I think an illustrative example on the use of your algorithm on other SAR images will bring more clarity to this interesting research work. 5. Also, the performance criteria used in the paper to show the robustness of your algorithm compared to existing ones in literature is not clear in the paper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments that could be useful to improve the manuscript have been incorporated in the review document

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The issues described in the paper, regarding the automatic recognition of objects, are insufficiently documented and do not bring anything new in the discussed topic. Fig. 1 of the drawings needs to be edited, it is unreadable. There are no references to mathematical formulas to literature items. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The article was corrected after the reviewers' comments, which improved its quality.

Back to TopTop