Next Article in Journal
Malcertificate: Research and Implementation of a Malicious Certificate Detection Algorithm Based on GCN
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Speciation of Antarctic Atmospheric Depositions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Retrospective Study Regarding Orthodontic Retention Complications in Clinical Practice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue on Current Techniques and Materials in Dentistry

by
Mitsuru Motoyoshi
1,2
1
Department of Orthodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan
2
Division of Clinical Research, Dental Research Center, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(9), 4439; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094439
Submission received: 7 April 2022 / Revised: 20 April 2022 / Accepted: 21 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Techniques and Materials in Dentistry)

1. Introduction

In the field of dentistry, the use of regenerative therapy, as well as biocompatible and biomimetic materials, is well-established. Biocompatible and biomimetic materials have advanced, as have methods for maximizing the effectiveness of their applications and the associated technology. The application of polymer compounds, such as composite resins and dentin adhesives, in crown restoration is an extremely interesting topic, along with techniques for implanting jawbones and digital dentistry. Advances therein over time have led to innovations.

2. Innovations in Dental Materials and Technology

Composite resins, which are among the most innovative dental materials, are composed of organic polymers, inorganic fillers, and silane coupling agents [1,2]. Composite resins imitate the tooth structure and require a lot of attention; they form cured products via the polymerization of monomers, and the polymerization reaction affects their properties.
For photo-polymerized resins under ambient temperatures, the double bond conversion is rapid [3]. As the resin turns glassy and vitrifies, mobility is reduced, monomer conversion is hindered, and the reaction rate slows [4,5]. Mobility is reduced to the extent that photo-polymerization always leads to incomplete conversion. For photo-polymerized composites, there are guiding principles to maximize conversion, where insufficient conversion can lead to color instability and material degradation [6,7,8,9,10]. It has been suggested that heat polymerization, as used in polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) materials, may provide a more consistent source of energy for the reaction, leading to a higher degree of conversion.
The bond between the resin composite and tooth surface has also been subject to many innovations. Functional monomers with hydrophilic groups, which form chemical bonds with the tooth surface, have been used in various resin-based materials, such as self-adhesive resin cements, universal adhesives, self-adhesive flowable restorative materials, and orthodontic adhesive pastes. These adherent materials can simply be applied to the tooth substance. However, they have weaker etching capabilities than previous adhesive systems, leading to concerns about their low elastic modulus and marginal gap formation when used on enamel without any pre-treatment [11,12]. The effect of the application method on adhesiveness is also of concern.
Dental implants are one of the most interesting types of dental materials. For dental implant materials, inorganic materials such as titanium, titanium alloys, alumina oxide-based ceramics, hydroxyapatite and zirconia have been presented along with various applications. PEEK (polyetheretherketone) has recently been reported as a further innovation in polymer implant materials [13], although it has not yet met biomechanical requirements. In orthodontics, mini-implants are crucial to the success of treatment and are used in various clinical situations. Mini-implants, composed of titanium, titanium alloys, or other materials, are implanted into the bone, and the implant success rate is an important clinical endpoint. Microcracks caused by over-torquing in thick and hard bone [14], and the consequent heat production, may lower the success rate.
Digital technology is also revolutionizing the field of dentistry. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques are becoming increasingly popular. In the field of prosthodontics, 30 years after the first report on digital removable prostheses, many systems now exist to reduce the number of patient appointments and laboratory time [15,16,17,18]. The process of manufacturing complete dentures using computer-assisted technology involves the acquisition of clinical information and designing the prostheses using computer software. Complete dentures can be produced using an additive (3D printing) or subtractive (milling) process. Thus, CAD/CAM techniques for denture fabrication have many clinical and laboratory advantages [19,20,21,22].
Treatment planning and diagnosis are also expected to improve greatly with innovations in materials and technology. Although this Special Issue is now closed, innovative and detailed research on dental material technology is expected in the future. We encourage the integration and upgrading of clinical practice applications.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This issue would not have been possible without the contributions of the talented authors and dedicated reviewers. We would like to take this opportunity to express our heartfelt gratitude to all those involved.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cramer, N.; Stansbury, J.; Bowman, C. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 90, 402–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ferracane, J.L. Resin composite-State of the art. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stansbury, J.W.; Dickens, S.H. Network formation and compositional drift during photo-initiated copolymerization of dimethacrylate monomers. Polymer 2001, 42, 6363–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lovell, L.G.; Berchtold, K.A.; Elliott, J.E.; Lu, H.; Bowman, C.N. Understanding the kinetics and network formation of dimethacrylate dental resins. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2001, 12, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dickens, S.H.; Stansbury, J.; Choi, K.; Floyd, C. Photopolymerization kinetics of methacrylate dental resins. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 6043–6053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tanaka, K.; Taira, M.; Shintani, H.; Wakasa, K.; Yamaki, M. Residual monomers (TEGDMA and Bis-GMA) of a set visible-light-cured dental composite resin when immersed in water. J. Oral Rehabil. 1991, 18, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rathbun, M.A.; Craig, R.G.; Hanks, C.T.; Filisko, F.E. Cytotoxicity of a BIS-GMA dental composite before and after leaching in organic solvents. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1991, 25, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohsen, N.; Craig, R.G.; Hanks, C. Cytotoxicity of urethane dimethacrylate composites before and after aging and leaching. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1998, 39, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Söderholm, K.-J.; Mariotti, A. BIS-GMA–based resins in dentistry: Are they safe? J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1999, 130, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Landuyt, K.L.; Nawrot, T.; Geebelen, B.; De Munck, J.; Snauwaert, J.; Yoshihara, K.; Scheers, H.; Godderis, L.; Hoet, P.; Van Meerbeek, B.; et al. How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27, 723–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takamizawa, T.; Barkmeier, W.W.; Latta, M.A.; Berry, T.P.; Tsujimoto, A.; Miyazaki, M. Simulated wear of self-adhesive resin cements. Oper. Dent. 2016, 41, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Imai, A.; Takamizawa, T.; Sugimura, R.; Tsujimoto, A.; Ishii, R.; Kawazu, M.; Saito, T.; Miyazaki, M. Interrelation among the handling, mechanical, and wear properties of the newly developed flowable resin composites. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 89, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ghazal-Maghras, R.; Vilaplana-Vivo, J.; Camacho-Alonso, F.; Martínez-Beneyto, Y. Properties of polyetheretheretherketone (PEEK) implant abutments: A systematic review. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2022, 14, e349–e358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tachibana, R.; Motoyoshi, M.; Shinohara, A.; Shigeeda, T.; Shimizu, N. Safe placement techniques for self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012, 41, 1439–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kattadiyil, M.T.; Goodacre, C.J.; Baba, N.Z. CAD/CAM complete dentures: A review of two commercial fabrication systems. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2013, 41, 407–416. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwindling, F.S.; Stober, T. A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 116, 756–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Steinmassl, P.-A.; Klaunzer, F.; Steinmassl, O.; Dumfahrt, H.; Grunert, I. Evaluation of currently available CAD/CAM denture systems. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2017, 30, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kattadiyil, M.T.; AlHelal, A. An update on computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review on clinical outcomes. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2017, 117, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goodacre, C.J.; Garbacea, A.; Naylor, W.P.; Daher, T.; Marchack, C.B.; Lowry, J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: Concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2012, 107, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bidra, A.S.; Taylor, T.D.; Agar, J.R. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: Systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2013, 109, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Infante, L.; Yilmaz, B.; McGlumphy, E.; Finger, I. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014, 111, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Saponaro, P.C.; Yilmaz, B.; Heshmati, R.H.; McGlumphy, E.A. Clinical performance of CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures: A cross-sectional study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 116, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Motoyoshi, M. Special Issue on Current Techniques and Materials in Dentistry. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4439. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094439

AMA Style

Motoyoshi M. Special Issue on Current Techniques and Materials in Dentistry. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(9):4439. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094439

Chicago/Turabian Style

Motoyoshi, Mitsuru. 2022. "Special Issue on Current Techniques and Materials in Dentistry" Applied Sciences 12, no. 9: 4439. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094439

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop