Next Article in Journal
Positron Emission Tomography in Coronary Heart Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Supporting the Work of a Psychologist and Its Evaluation on the Example of Support for Psychological Diagnosis of Anorexia
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of City–Industry Integration Development and Regional Differences under the New Urbanization: A Case Study of Sichuan

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(9), 4698; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094698
by Lu Gan 1,2,3,*, Lihong Wei 1, Shan Huang 1, Benjamin Lev 3 and Wen Jiang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(9), 4698; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094698
Submission received: 9 April 2022 / Revised: 30 April 2022 / Accepted: 4 May 2022 / Published: 7 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Green Sustainable Science and Technology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,
First of all, congratulations on the work presented.
I enjoyed the research. 
The topic is pertinent, and the structure of the article seems adequate.
The research design and methodology adopted are strong points of the article.
As suggestions for improvement, I suggest including some authors cited in the bibliographical references to corroborate the conclusions presented by the authors. Another suggestion is the more detailed specification of suggestions for future research.
Best of luck with your article.
Best Regards,

Author Response

Dear reviewer, we would like to thank you for your careful and patient review and for your constructive, helpful comments. According to each of your suggestions, we have done our best to revise this paper. English in the paper has been thoroughly improved. We consulted a native speaker to help us improve the writing of this paper to enhance its readability, and all the sentences have been checked. Other revisions for the specific comments are as follows:

 

Q1: Including some authors cited in the bibliographical references to corroborate the conclusions presented by the authors.

A: Thank you for your kind suggestion. We have added some cited authors to the bibliographical references in the conclusion section to support the summary we have made, mainly in the discussion of the results of empowerment and scoring. On this basis, we have further supplemented the conclusion part to make our summary more comprehensive.

 

Q2: More detailed specification of suggestions for future research.

A: Thank you for your rigorous comment. We have expanded the previous future research section and described in detail the two directions in which city-industry integration can be further extended. It is mainly divided into the update of data to improve the indicators, as well as the further introduction of regional difference methods, hoping to play a certain enlightening role in relevant research.

 

We appreciate all the useful comments from you. Thank you for your careful and patient help and hope that our revisions could meet your requirements.

 

Best regards,

 

Lu Gan, Lihong Wei, Shan Huang, Benjamin Lev, Weng Jiang

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor and aurthor(s), thank you for inviting me to review this interesting manuscript.

I found it very timely and interesting in order to explore city urbanization dynamics with specific reference to industry closeness to urban systems.

In particular, I found the manuscript very sound in terms of both the analysis of existing references and also of the methodology and the metrics that have been adopted in order to perform this research study.

In particular, the framework proposed in Figure n. 1 is very comprehensive and includes all relevant perspectives of analysis, to me.

The study is ready for publication, then, however, some further revisions are needed, with reference to the following aspects:

1) An English proofreading is suggested;

2) A discussion on study limitations of this study is needed in the conclusion section.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you very much for your kind and helpful suggestion. We are very glad that the content and structure of this paper interest you. We read every comment and suggestion from you very carefully. According to your advice, English in the paper has been thoroughly improved. We contacted a native speaker to help us improve the writing of this paper to enhance its readability, and all the sentences have been checked. Other revisions for the specific comments are as follows:

 

Q1: An English proofreading is suggested.

A: Thank you for your kind suggestions. English in the paper has been thoroughly improved. We consulted a native speaker to help us improve the writing of this paper to enhance its readability, and all the sentences have been checked.

 

Q2: A discussion on study limitations of this study is needed in the conclusion section.

A: Thanks for your great suggestion on Conclusion. We added the study limitations in the conclusion section, which is mainly divided into the typicality of the region and the collection of data. After detailing the shortcomings caused by these two aspects, we also added how future research on city-industry integration can be further developed, so the conclusion section is now in much better shape.

 

We appreciate all the careful comments from you and hope that our revisions could meet your requirements.

 

Best regards,

 

Lu Gan, Lihong Wei, Shan Huang, Benjamin Lev, Weng Jiang

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop