Vibration Characteristics and Experimental Research of an Improved Bistable Piezoelectric Energy Harvester
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
the article is interesting, I ask for the answer to my comments before any kind of decision,
1- What is the maximum value of vibration that you designed ystem can support?
2- Please give more details about the used magnets (material, magnetic field value, weight of each magnet, etc).
3- if you develop something interesting. what is the price and added benefits of your prototype in comparison with those existing in the market.
4- please compare your results with other works in the literature.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
Thank you very much for your guidance.Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the indispensable guiding significance to our researches. We have carefully revised the paper according to your comments. Please see the attachment.
Yours sincerely,
Xuhui Zhang, Hao Tian, Jianan Pan, Xiaoyu Chen, Mengyao Huang, Hengtao Xu, Fulin Zhu, Yan Guo
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
This paper presents an improved version of bistable piezoelectric energy harvester. Both simulation and experiments are conducted to demonstrate its effectiveness and comparisons are also made to show its superiority. The paper can be considered for publication after incorporating minor revisions:
1. ‘but these methods pose challenges to the fabrication of materials and the stability of system operation’ – Why do those methods pose such challenges? How do those challenges come from?
2. ‘Based on the research of the research group [27], this paper proposes …’ – why do the authors conduct the present research based on that study? What is advantage of that method to be based on? What is also its disadvantage to be improved in this work?
3. What is the main motivation and contribution of the present work? This is not clearly illustrated in Introduction?
4. There are many grammar mistakes in the text, which should be checked and avoided.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
Thank you very much for your guidance.Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the indispensable guiding significance to our researches. We have carefully revised the paper according to your comments. Please see the attachment.
Yours sincerely,
Xuhui Zhang, Hao Tian, Jianan Pan, Xiaoyu Chen, Mengyao Huang, Hengtao Xu, Fulin Zhu, Yan Guo
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf