Next Article in Journal
Upper First Molar and Second Premolar Distalization with Clear Aligner and Interradicular Skeletal Anchorage: A Finite Element Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Robustness Evaluation of Aerodynamic Flutter Stability and Aerostatic Torsional Stability of Long-Span Suspension Bridges
Previous Article in Journal
Exposure to Noise and Vibration of Vocational Education Training Teachers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue on Recent Challenges and Innovations in Long-Span Bridges

Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(17), 9694; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179694
Submission received: 23 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 28 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Challenges and Innovations in Long-Span Bridges)
Bridges are typical structures that provide connections between destinations and therefore achieve transportation functionality. Millions of bridges have been built around the world, becoming an essential part of the modern transportation system. The determination of a bridge span arrangement should satisfy requirements for shipping, construction, and mechanical performance [1], and the engineering economics [2] should also be considered in the process. Therefore, long-span bridges are necessary in some major engineering projects crossing valleys, rivers, or canals. Girder bridges, arch bridges, cable-stayed bridges, and suspension bridges are the most basic types of bridges. Taking advantage of the developments of material properties, construction method and equipment, computational ability, and design theory, the applicable span range for these types of bridges has showcased significant increases.
Girder bridges are one of the oldest bridge types. In ancient times, wood and stone were used to build girder bridges. The longest girder bridge is the Shibanpo Parallel Yangtze River Bridge [3], with a main span of 330 m, completed in 2006 in Chongqing, China. The Taoer River Bridge, which is currently under construction in Shandong Province, China, will break this record, with a main span of 338 m after completion. Arch bridges first appeared in the form of masonry arches in Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greece, and later in Ancient Rome. Currently, the longest steel, concrete, and concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges are the Chaotianmen Bridge (552 m) [4], the Shanghai-Kunming High-speed Railway Bridge over the Beipan River (445 m) [5], and the Third Pingnan Bridge (560 m) [6], respectively. The Lantian Fifth Yangtze River Bridge, a steel-box arch bridge of 578 m, the Fenglai Bridge, a steel-truss arch bridge of 580 m, and the Tiane Longtan Bridge, a stiff-skeleton concrete arch bridge of 600 m, will further break these records after completion. All the above arch bridges are located in China. The Swedish Strömsund Bridge, built in 1955 with a main span of 183 m, is often recognized as the first modern cable-stayed bridge [7]. After this, the maximum span of cable-stayed bridges increased rapidly due to their excellent crossing ability. In the 21st century, the span record for the cable-stayed bridge has exceeded 1000 m with the completion of the Sutong Bridge (1088 m) [8], the Stonecutters Bridge (1018 m) [9], and the Russky Bridge (1104 m) [10]. The Changtai Yangtze River Bridge, which is under construction in Nanjing, China, will set a new record with an anticipated span of 1176 m after completion. Modern suspension bridges, characterized by the use of steel wires to fabricate the main cables, began with the Brooklyn Bridge, which was completed in 1883 in the United States, with a span length of 486 m. In 1931, the George Washington Bridge, with a span of 1067 m, was completed, becoming the world’s first bridge with a span longer than a kilometer [11]. In 1998, the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge, which has a main span length of 1991 m and adopted prefabricated parallel-wire strands, was completed in Japan [12]. In 2022, the 1915 Canakkale Bridge, which has a main span length of 2023 m and adopted a twin-box stiffening girder to enhance the stability under wind loads, was completed in Turkey [13]. Moreover, the Shiziyang Bridge, with a main span of 2180 m, and the Zhangjinggao Bridge, with a main span of 2300 m, are currently under construction in China [14].
Despite the above achievements, there are still some major strait projects in the planning stage, for instance the Bohai Strait, Taiwan Strait in China, the Gibraltar Strait in Italy, and the Bering Strait between the Pacific and Arctic oceans. Therefore, there still exists genuine demand for the construction of record-shattering long-span bridges, and bridge engineers will have to grapple with new unique challenges, such as bridge foundations in deep waters and aerodynamic challenges for long-span cable-supported bridges, to name a few. Researchers and engineers are investigating multiple techniques and innovations to deal with these challenges, including the combination and innovation of bridge structural systems [15], innovation in passive or active control techniques [16], and improvements in structural system resilience. Ge et al. [17] investigated the aerodynamic stability of super-long span suspension bridges with a main span of 5000 m. Xiao et al. [18] discussed the design scheme for cable-stayed bridges with a main span length of nearly 1500 m. Bridge engineers have also achieved developments in several key technologies, including multi-functional large-span bridges [5], steel box or truss girder and steel-concrete composite beam [19,20], design and construction of deep-water foundations [21], etc.
On the other hand, after the completion of construction, bridges can face severe challenges in terms of life-cycle maintenance, disaster prevention, and mitigation. To address these issues, engineers and researchers have developed portable, non-destructive detection equipment and bridge loading experimentation for various types of bridges [22]. Structural health monitoring systems and the field of sensing, data storage, and processing have also made progress [23,24]. In terms of intelligent maintenance, fast identification and intelligent analysis of bridge inspection data have been realized, and the building information model [25] is gradually becoming the technical basis for the integration of construction, management, and maintenance. Moreover, developments in computational methods, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, have provided a new approach for assessing structural performance, therefore tracking and managing the evolving risks [26,27].
In conclusion, great achievements have been made in the construction of long-span bridges, but bridge engineers still need to embrace new challenges. Bridge engineers should work together to reasonably tackle these challenges with technical innovations and developments, therefore driving more sustainable, high-quality, safe, and effective engineering construction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tang, M.-C. Super-long span bridges. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2017, 13, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, L.; Xiao, R.; Sun, B.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhuang, D.; Zhou, Y.; Tu, X. Study on economic performances of multi-span suspension bridges part 1: Simple estimation formulas. Struct. Eng. Mech. Int. J. 2013, 47, 265–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, M.-C. The New Shibanpo Bridge, Chongqing, China. Struct. Eng. Int. 2010, 20, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cheng, J. Optimum design of steel truss arch bridges using a hybrid genetic algorithm. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2010, 66, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qin, S.; Gao, Z. Developments and prospects of long-span high-speed railway bridge technologies in China. Engineering 2017, 3, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, J.; Wang, J. Concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges in China. Engineering 2018, 4, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, M.C. Cable-stayed bridges. In Bridge Engineering Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  8. You, Q.; He, P.; Dong, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, S. Sutong Bridge—The longest cable-stayed bridge in the world. Struct. Eng. Int. 2008, 18, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Falbe-Hansen, K.; Hauge, L.; Kite, S. Stonecutters bridge-detailed design. IABSE Rep. 2004, 88, 150. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pipinato, A. Case study: The Russky bridge. In Innovative Bridge Design Handbook; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 671–680. [Google Scholar]
  11. Buonopane, S.G.; Billington, D.P. Theory and history of suspension bridge design from 1823 to 1940. J. Struct. Eng. 1993, 119, 954–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kitagawa, M. Technology of the akashi kaikyo bridge. Struct. Control. Health Monit. 2004, 11, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kroon, I.B.; Polk, H.; Fuglsang, K. 1915 Çanakkale Bridge–Meeting the Challenge. In Proceedings of the Developments in International Bridge Engineering: Selected Papers from Istanbul Bridge Conference 2018, Turkey, Istanbul, 5–6 November 2018; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 55–69. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xiao, R.; Song, C.; Sun, B.; Dai, W.; Liu, J. Reliability-assisted determination of partial factors for the design of main cables considering secondary stress effect. Structures 2023, 48, 1479–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhuang, D.; Xiao, R.; Sun, B.; Yang, L. Concept and preliminary static analysis of hybrid anchored suspension bridge. J. Bridge Eng. 2021, 26, 4021032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tao, T.; Wang, H.; Yao, C.; He, X. Parametric sensitivity analysis on the buffeting control of a long-span triple-tower suspension bridge with MTMD. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ge, Y.-J. Aerodynamic challenge and limitation in long-span cable-supported bridges. In Proceedings of the Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research (ACEM16), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 28 August–1 September 2016; Volume 16. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xiong, W.; Cai, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, R. Study of super long span cable-stayed bridges with CFRP components. Eng. Struct. 2011, 33, 330–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shao, X.; Yi, D.; Huang, Z.; Zhao, H.; Chen, B.; Liu, M. Basic performance of the composite deck system composed of orthotropic steel deck and ultrathin RPC layer. J. Bridge Eng. 2013, 18, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiao, R.; Song, C.; Sun, B.; Guo, R.; Chen, H. Design and experimental study of a replaceable steel-UHPC composite bridge deck. Structures 2022, 40, 1107–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wei, K.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, M.; Ti, Z.; Qin, S. Review of the hydrodynamic challenges in the design of elevated pile cap foundations for sea-crossing bridges. Adv. Bridge Eng. 2020, 1, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dan, D.; Ge, L.; Yan, X. Identification of moving loads based on the information fusion of weigh-in-motion system and multiple camera machine vision. Measurement 2019, 144, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, L.; Shang, Z.; Xia, Y.; Bhowmick, S.; Nagarajaiah, S. Review of bridge structural health monitoring aided by big data and artificial intelligence: From condition assessment to damage detection. J. Struct. Eng. 2020, 146, 4020073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Surace, C. Special issue on novel approaches for structural health monitoring. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiao, R.; Lian, Y.; Sun, B.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Z.; Tang, P. Method of bridge structural analysis based on bridge information modeling. In Proceedings of the 2017 ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, IWCCE 2017, Seattle, WA, USA, 25–27 June 2017; pp. 92–100. [Google Scholar]
  26. Song, C.; Zhang, C.; Shafieezadeh, A.; Xiao, R. Value of information analysis in non-stationary stochastic decision environments: A reliability-assisted POMDP approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2022, 217, 108034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Mazumder, R.K.; Salarieh, B.; Salman, A.M.; Shafieezadeh, A.; Li, Y. Machine learning for risk and resilience assessment in structural engineering: Progress and future trends. J. Struct. Eng. 2022, 148, 3122003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, B.; Xiao, R.; Song, C. Special Issue on Recent Challenges and Innovations in Long-Span Bridges. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9694. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179694

AMA Style

Sun B, Xiao R, Song C. Special Issue on Recent Challenges and Innovations in Long-Span Bridges. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(17):9694. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179694

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Bin, Rucheng Xiao, and Chaolin Song. 2023. "Special Issue on Recent Challenges and Innovations in Long-Span Bridges" Applied Sciences 13, no. 17: 9694. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179694

APA Style

Sun, B., Xiao, R., & Song, C. (2023). Special Issue on Recent Challenges and Innovations in Long-Span Bridges. Applied Sciences, 13(17), 9694. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179694

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop