Next Article in Journal
Spatial Modeling through GIS Analysis of Flood Risk and Related Financial Vulnerability: Case Study: Turcu River, Romania
Next Article in Special Issue
An Investigation into the Influence of Sample Height on the Consolidation Behaviour of Dredged Silt
Previous Article in Journal
Textural Analysis Supports Prostate MR Diagnosis in PIRADS Protocol
Previous Article in Special Issue
Creep Characteristics of a Strongly Weathered Argillaceous Sandstone Sliding Zone and the Disaster Evolution Mechanism of the Huaipa Landslide, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Soil Properties’ Spatial Correlation Lengths and Inclination on Permanent Slope Displacements Due to Earthquake Excitation

by
Nikolaos Alamanis
1,* and
Panagiotis Dakoulas
2
1
Department of Agrotechnology, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece
2
Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Thessaly, 38334 Volos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(17), 9868; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179868
Submission received: 24 July 2023 / Revised: 27 August 2023 / Accepted: 29 August 2023 / Published: 31 August 2023

Abstract

:
Natural disasters, when and where they occur, often cause serious social and economic consequences, which require an urgent solution to the problem. In particular, Greece, which is characterized by a complex geological structure and intense tectonic stress, has suffered and continues to suffer the consequences of such catastrophic phenomena. Among the various destructive phenomena recorded on the Earth’s surface, two of the most important problems are landslides and land subsidence. The above phenomena may cause, in addition to the serious case of loss of human life, a threat to the social and economic fabric affecting sustainability in general, i.e., the quality of life of an area (destruction of property, filling of reservoirs, blockage of streams and rivers, etc.). In fact, landslides are a phenomenon with enormous social and economic consequences, since apart from the financial burden due to the collapse of a technical project or the interruption of transportation, they are accompanied by the loss of human life. This research examines the stochastic characteristics of a slopes’ stability to investigate the variation range of permanent earthquake movements. More specifically, the influence of inclination as well as the lengths of the spatial correlation of ground are investigated. The method in the present study follows the development of arbitrary fields of soil properties, which follow the Gaussian distribution characterized by autocorrelation lengths lx and ly in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively, mean value μ, standard deviation σ, and cross-correlation coefficients ρij. The estimation of permanent displacements is performed by the combination of the Local Average Subdivision algorithm and the FLAC software (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) used in the parametric investigation of this work. The results of this research showed that the spatial correlation of the properties has an important impact on the permanent displacements of slopes caused by strong earthquake excitations.

1. Introduction

Based on available published data and on the usage of the Local Average Subdivision method (Fenton et al., 1990, 2008) [1,2] and the program Mathematica, an extensive series of random fields were developed. Then, with the aid of arbitrary fields of soil properties, a fully automated procedure was created based on the finite difference software FLAC (Itasca, 2011) [3], which was used to conduct a large number of stability analyses and seismic simulations. FLAC is suitable for solving non-linear geotechnical engineering problems in two dimensions, as it incorporates specialized constitutive models that model the behaviour of various soil materials under the application of significant plastic deformations.
In order to conduct a significant number of parametric analyses, it was necessary: (a) to automate the entire procedure of creating arbitrary fields of soil properties with targeted values, (b) to create automated numerical models for mechanical behaviour analysis, and, finally, (c) to execute and automatically process the results to produce data for the statistical analysis. The results of the static and dynamic analyses are automatically entered into the program Mathematica, and from the results of the processing, new files are created for further statistical analysis and grouping. The total automation of the process through the program Mathematica allows the rapid and effective execution of the analysis, and therefore makes it possible to create many parametric analyses for the examination of the effect of spatial variability of the properties of soil on earthquake behaviour. Numerical simulations display that the spatial variability of soil properties has an important impact on the permanent displacement values of the earth slope for a series of earthquake loadings. For this purpose, models of various slopes are analyzed. Afterwards, the results are compared with corresponding results from analyses of homogeneous slopes having the same properties to the average values of the random fields used as a reference basis in this study.
The safety factor is used as a safety criterion for static conditions, and the permanent displacement of the slope at the end of shaking is utilized as a performance criterion under seismic conditions. Through the usage of numerical simulations, it has been shown that the spatial variability of properties of soil significantly affects the permanent displacements. Various statistical analyses of the numerical results have shown that the most appropriate statistical distributions for the description of resident earthquake displacements are the Weibull, Extreme Value, and Gamma.

2. Literature Review

With the aid of random fields of soil properties, a fully automated procedure was created using FLAC [3]. Griffiths and Fenton [4] and Griffiths and Huang [5] used the LAS methodology to examine slope stability under static conditions with the usage of a FEM (finite element method). This work examines the resulting failure probability relative to the soil statistical parameters, and recommends a simplified harmonic mean approach. This averaging approach is recommended for the estimation of the probability of failure that avoids the necessity for Monte Carlo modeling. Griffiths et al. [6] studied the probability of slope failure under static conditions with the usage of a simplified methodology and a sophisticated stochastic FEM. The latter methodology was used in combination with Monte Carlo modeling, in which the spatial variation is taken into account. It must be underlined that the study on slope stability with the usage of probabilistic methodologies in references [4,5,6] concentrates entirely on the static behaviour, in contrast to the earthquake performance examined in Section 3, Section 4, and Section 5 in the work herein. Analytical reviews of these research undertakings may be found in Cho, 2007; Taha, 2010; Tabarroki et al., 2013; Zhang and Goh, 2012 [7,8,9,10], as well as in recent studies by Zhang et al., 2015; Ji and Chan, 2014; Li et al., 2014; Ji, 2014; Jiang et al., 2014; Low, B.K.,-Phoon, K., 2015; Schöbi and Sudret, 2015; Liu et al., 2017; Lü et al., 2017 [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
It should also be mentioned that experimental data on soil properties are given in the references [20,21,22,23,24], some typical values of which are used in the seismic analyses of the present study. A Kronecker-based covariance specification is presented by Ribeiro et al., 2022 [25], who propose a simple construction that allows generalization to larger dimensions more easily but does not deal with the effects of soil properties’ spatial correlation lengths and inclination on permanent slope displacements. Various approaches have been developed for the simulation of non-Gaussian and non-stationary cross-correlated random fields, among which is the very interesting work written by Hongzhe Dai et al., 2022 [26]. The goal of this paper is to develop a conceptually simple methodology for the simulation of non-Gaussian and non-stationary cross-correlated random fields with arbitrary correlation structures and marginal distributions but does not study the effect of spatial correlation lengths or inclination on permanent slope displacements. Additionally, the work written by Ye W. Tun et al., 2016 [27], which proposes a genetic algorithm considering the limit equilibrium method to search for multiple critical failures, appears very interesting. This study does not estimate the permanent displacements of slopes and also does not use the combination of the Local Average Subdivision algorithm and the FLAC software (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) for the parametric investigation as does our work. Additionally, it does not take in account the impact of spatial correlation lengths or inclination on permanent slope displacements. The works of Cormac Reale et al., 2015, 2016 [28,29] applied a reliability method which focuses entirely on the FOS calculation of the static behavior, as opposed to the permanent displacements due to seismic performance investigated in this paper. More importantly, the excellent study of Peiping Li et al., 2023, [30], proposes a method which is able to deal with a large number of cross-correlated quantities for big data analytics in a high-dimension domain. This study goes further than that of Jiang et al., 2023 [31], which proposes a novel eigenvalue-based iteration method that significantly improves the efficiency of multivariate non-Gaussian random field simulation and, also, the work by H. Zhu et al. (2017) [32], which presents a generic methodology for generating multivariate cross-correlated random fields. Most of these works do not take in account the impact of spatial correlation lengths or inclination on permanent slope displacements.
In the present study, the seismic analysis is performed using the finite difference program FLAC in which soil behavior is simulated with the elasto-plastic Mohr–Coulomb model combined with an appropriate hysteretic model to capture the effects of cyclic loading on the stiffness degradation and critical damping ratio with increasing amplitude of cyclic shear strain. The formulation is appropriate for large strain analysis capable of handling large soil deformation during seismic loading. This rigorous numerical formulation is applied to investigate the effects of the spatial variability of soil properties for various geometries of slopes, subjected to a series of excitations of varying temporal and frequency characteristics, in order to assess their seismic performance.
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that examines the combined effects of the spatial variability of soil properties, spatial correlation lengths and inclination on permanent slope displacements. In this respect, the work presented here differs significantly from the results presented in the literature, as can be seen in the following sections.

3. Numerical Model with Random Fields of Material Properties

An example of the numerical model discretization of a slope with inclination 2:1 (H:V) using the FLAC program is given in Figure 1. This model is used to examine the effects of the variation of soil properties, the characteristic autocorrelation lengths lx and ly, and the intensity and frequency content of the seismic excitation. Two additional numerical models with different slope inclinations are examined later in the paper.
Table 1 gives the mean value μ and standard variation σ of the cohesion c, friction angle φ, Young’s elastic modulus E, and density ρ. The dilation angle ψ and Poisson’s ratio v are also given, but without considering any variation. The cross-correlation coefficients ρij of the properties i and j, based on published experimental data, are given in Table 2. The ρij values for which no experimental data were found have been considered as equal to zero (Rackwitz, 2000, Zheng Wu, 2013) [20,21].
It should be noted that random fields following the Gauss distribution are defined by their mean value μ , the standard variation σ , and the autocorrelation function ρ ( x , y ) . The most commonly used expression for the autocorrelation function between two points x , y and x , y in a two-dimensional anisotropic space is given by
ρ ( x , y ) = E x p [ x x l x y y l y ]
where l x and l y are the characteristic autocorrelation lengths in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. These lengths define the scale of fluctuation of the random field. Higher values of autocorrelation lengths indicate a stronger statistical correlation between two points. Table 3 shows the autocorrelation lengths ly, lx in the vertical and horizontal directions, respectively, used in this study (Phoon et al., 1999) [22,23].
To illustrate the development of a numerical model of the slope using random fields of properties, the geometry in Figure 1 is considered. The soil properties are shown in Table 1 and the cross-correlation coefficients are shown in Table 2. The characteristic autocorrelation lengths used are ly = 2 m in the vertical direction and lx = 20 m in the horizontal direction. The generation of the random field of the material properties using the LAS method assumes a Gaussian distribution. One realization of the spatial distribution of the random fields of soil cohesion c , shear strength angle φ, Young’s modulus E , and density ρ is displayed in Figure 2.
The random fields presented in Figure 2 cover a grid of 128 × 64 zones, in which each zone has the dimensions dx = dy = 1 m. It is evident in the random fields in Figure 2 that there are different spatial correlations of the soil properties in the horizontal and vertical directions.
The numerical models developed in this study are subjected to strong ground motion to investigate their seismic performance in terms of permanent displacements at the end of shaking. Table 4 provides the basic characteristics of five historical seismic records used as excitations in the study. These records have been modified to match the acceleration design spectra of Eurocode 8 for rock sites, scaled to a maximum peak ground acceleration of 0.3 g. Figure 3 shows the acceleration response spectra of the modified seismic excitations and the Eurocode 8 acceleration spectra for rock sites.

4. Impact of the Spatial Correlation of Soil Properties

This section examines the impact of the length of spatial correlation on permanent horizontal, vertical, and total displacement. The permanent displacements are evaluated at the top of the slope, indicated as point A in Figure 1.
More specifically, three cases are investigated as shown in Table 3. For case a, the autocorrelation lengths are lx = 20 m and ly = 2 m; for case b, they are lx = 40 m and ly = 2 m; and for case c, they are lx = 20 m and ly = 4 m. All analyses correspond to a sample greater than or equal to 30. Table 5 shows the data of the cases to be compared. Along with the lengths lx and ly, the values of the ratios lx/dx and ly/dy are also given, where dx = horizontal length of the failure surface and dy = height of the failure surface. Figure 4 shows a representative surface of failure and the dimensions dx and dy (Alamanis, 2017) [24].
When the lengths lx and ly tend to infinity, then the soil becomes homogeneous. Conversely, when the lengths lx and ly tend to zero then the soil changes its properties randomly without any correlation between two adjacent or distant points. The use of ratios lx/dx and ly/dy helps us better understand the impact of spatial variability of soil properties in relation to the dimensions of the expected failure surface. Indeed, when the ratios li/di take values greater than one or two (li/di > 1 or 2), then the material at a given point has properties with a strong correlation with those found in other points within the failure surface, and thus tends to approach homogeneity. The method of determining the development of the failure surface of slopes is based on monitoring the equivalent plastic strain increment throughout the analysis. When it increases significantly and abruptly along a surface, this suggests that there is significant movement along this surface and indicates the initiation of a sliding failure.
The evolution of the horizontal and vertical displacement at point A for heterogeneous soil (see Figure 1) is given in Figure 5, with residual values at the end of shaking equal to 0.75 m, respectively.
Figure 6 illustrates the probability density function of the permanent horizontal displacement ux for the various values of lx and ly based on the Weibull distribution. It is observed that for a fixed value of ly = 2 m, when lx increases from 20 m to 40 m, there is a very small decrease of the dispersion, as the soil becomes relatively homogeneous. Conversely, for a constant value lx = 20 m, when ly increases from 2 m to 4 m, the dispersion increases more significantly (Figure 6). Since the sample is significant (30 analyses), this trend can be interpreted as follows: doubling the autocorrelation length at high values (e.g., from 20 m to 40 m), the effect is low as both of these lengths suggest a large spatial autocorrelation. On the contrary, for a doubling of the autocorrelation length in small values (e.g., from 2 m to 4 m), the effect is significant in that the spatial correlation with short distances is small but increases more intensely with the doubling of the length ly.
In Figure 7, similar results are presented for the vertical permanent displacement, where the differences between the probability of densities are clearer. The results in Figure 7 indicate that there is some quantitative difference in the effect of the spatial correlation between the horizontal and vertical directions. Indeed, for vertical displacements, the doubling of the autocorrelation length significantly affects the dispersion of the results in both short and larger lengths. Finally, Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the results for the total permanent displacement as well as the probability of exceedance of a certain value of total permanent displacement u* for various values lx and ly, based on the Weibull distribution. The results on the effect of the length of the spatial correlation of soil properties presented here are given for only three value pairs of lx/dx and ly/dy ratios (90 simulations in total) due to space constraints.

5. Effect of Slope Inclination

This section examines the effect of slope inclination on the seismic behaviour of the slopes, adopting as performance criterion the permanent displacement at the end of shaking. More specifically, Table 6 presents three slope profiles (A, B, and C) corresponding to slope inclinations 2:1, 4:3, and 1:1, respectively, which have been investigated in this study. A common set of soil properties was assumed for the three slopes given in Table 7, in which the soil strength parameters are higher than those in Table 1 to avoid numerical difficulties in the case of steeper slopes. For the case of homogeneous slopes, Table 8 shows the static safety factor FS, the mean horizontal permanent displacement ux, the mean vertical permanent displacement uy, and the total permanent displacement u for the modified seismic records in Figure 3, matching the Eurocode 8 spectra (for rock sites) with a peak ground acceleration of 0.30 g.
Figure 10 presents the coefficient fx = ux/ūx of horizontal permanent displacement ux of the heterogeneous slope normalized with respect to the horizontal permanent displacement ūx of the homogeneous slope for the three slope inclinations. Additionally, Figure 11 and Figure 12 present the coefficients fy = uy/ūy and f = u/ū of the vertical and total permanent displacement of the heterogeneous slope with respect to the corresponding displacements of the homogeneous slope. As the permanent displacements ux, uy, u, ūx, ūy, and ū correspond to the same mean soil strength for a given slope, the coefficients fx = ux/ūx, fy = uy/ūy, and f = u/ū mainly express the impact of the spatial variability of soil properties, while the changes of the statistical characteristics of fx, fy, and f express the impact of slope inclination. As expected, it is shown by the results that increasing the slope inclination significantly increases the ratios of fx, fy, and f. The mean values of f for the 2:1, 4:3, and 1:1 slopes are 1.24, 1.54, and 1.90, respectively. It is observed that for the slopes 2:1 and 4:3, some values of f are less than 1, but for the slope 1:1, all values of f are larger than 1. Finally, Figure 13 plots the probability of exceedance of a given value f * of the coefficient f = u/ū of total permanent displacement for the three slopes (u = total permanent displacement, ū = total permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
To examine the impact of slope inclination on permanent displacements, it is of interest to utilize the derived statistical distribution of the ratio f x = u x / u ¯ x (or f y = u y / u ¯ y ) and the results of permanent displacements for homogeneous slopes u ¯ x (or u ¯ y ) given in Table 8, combined with the statistical distribution of normalized displacements expressing the temporal and frequency variability of the seismic excitation. For each slope inclination investigated, the combined effects of the spatial variability of soil properties and earthquake characteristics are expressed by the relations:
u x   =   u ¯ x   RV   ( Normal   Distribution   μ f x , σ f x )   ×   RV   ( Uniform   Distribution   r min , r max )
u y   =   u ¯ y   RV   ( Normal   Distribution   μ f y , σ f y )   ×   RV   ( Uniform   Distribution   r min , r max )
where
u x , u y = horizontal and vertical permanent displacements of heterogeneous slope
u ¯ x , u ¯ y = horizontal and vertical permanent displacements of homogeneous slope
RV = random variate
μ f x , μ f y = mean values of the coefficients fx, fy
σ f x , σ f y = standard variations of the coefficients fx, fy
r min , r max = bounds of uniform distribution
For the slope with inclination 2:1, Figure 14a plots a histogram with the distribution of the computed horizontal permanent displacement derived from a sample of 500 values of u x using Equation (2a). The distribution of u x is fitted with the Weibull, Extreme Value, and Gamma distributions. Moreover, Figure 14b,c, plot the computed values of the vertical permanent displacements u y and total permanent displacements u .
Similar results on the distribution of permanent displacements for slope inclination 4:3 are presented in Figure 15, and for slope inclination 1:1 in Figure 16. A comparison of the best fit test parameters for the three statistical distributions in all results presented in Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16 shows that the Weibull distribution clearly provides the best fit for all cases.
To examine the effect of inclination of slopes having the same mean strength, the probability density function of horizontal permanent displacements u x corresponding to the three slopes are compared in Figure 17a. It is evident from Figure 17a that the effect of slope inclination on u x is substantial, as both its mean value and variation of the results increase significantly with slope steepness. Indeed, the mean values of u x are 0.51 m, 0.94 m, and 1.28 m for the 2:1, 4:3, and 1:1 slopes, respectively. (It is noted that the mean values of horizontal permanent displacement u ¯ x of homogeneous slopes from Table 8 are 0.39, 0.41, and 0.76 m, respectively). Moreover, the corresponding standard deviations are 0.138, 0.304, and 0.344 for the three slopes. Similar conclusions for the effects of inclination of heterogeneous slopes on the vertical permanent displacements u y and total permanent displacements u , are derived from Figure 17b,c, respectively.
Moreover, Figure 18a plots the probability of exceedance of a given value of horizontal permanent displacement ux for slope inclinations 2:1, 4:3, and 1:1. Similar results for the vertical permanent displacement uy, and total permanent displacements u are given in Figure 18b,c, respectively.
Finally, it should be noted that the numerical results presented in Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16 correspond to seismic excitations having a peak ground acceleration of a g max = 0.3 g. To investigate the effect of material nonlinearity of permanent displacements of slopes, similar parametric investigations have been conducted for a wide range of peak ground accelerations from 0.05 g to 0.5 g (Alamanis, 2017) [24]. It has been shown that the seismic permanent displacements of a homogeneous slope ( u ¯ x , u ¯ y ) in equation (2) increase with the magnitude of peak ground acceleration a g max and can be described with an exponential function of the form.
u ¯ i = a i a g max / g b i
where a i , b i are constants (Alamanis, 2017) [24].

6. Conclusions

1. The spatial variability of material properties in earth slopes may have a significant effect on their seismic performance. Accounting for this spatial variability using stochastic methods allows for a better evaluation of the expected permanent displacements of slopes due to strong ground motion, and a better design for mitigation of the expected seismic damage.
2. It has been shown by using statistical analyses that the most suitable distributions for the description of permanent seismic displacements are the Gamma, Extreme Value, and Weibull distributions. Among them, the Weibull distribution provides the best fit of the numerical data.
3. The results show, as far as the impact on spatial correlation length of the soil properties is concerned, that for a doubling of autocorrelation length in large values (e.g., from 20 m to 40 m), the effect on horizontal displacements is low, since both of these lengths indicate great spatial autocorrelation. On the contrary, for doubling of autocorrelation length in small values (e.g., from 2 m to 4 m), the effect is significant in that the spatial correlation with short distances is small but increases more intensely with the doubling of distance. Indeed, for vertical displacements, the doubling of the autocorrelation length significantly affects the dispersion of the results.
4. For slopes with the same material strength, the results of the numerical simulations show that both the mean value and standard deviation of permanent seismic displacement increase substantially when slope inclination increases.
5. The automated procedure of combing the Local Average Subdivision algorithm and the FLAC software through the program Mathematica allowed for the efficient execution of complex, time-consuming Monte Carlo simulations and significantly helped the investigation of the effects of the spatial variability of soil properties on seismic permanent displacements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A. and P.D.; methodology, N.A. and P.D.; software, N.A. and P.D.; validation, N.A. and P.D.; formal analysis, N.A. and P.D.; investigation, N.A. and P.D.; resources, N.A. and P.D.; data curation, N.A. and P.D.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A.; writing—review and editing, P.D.; visualization, N.A. and P.D.; supervision, P.D.; project administration, N/A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No additional data are available beyond those presented in the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fenton, A.G.; Vanmarcke, E.H. Simulation of Random Fields via Local Average Subdivision. J. Eng. Mech. 1990, 116, 1733–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fenton, A.G.; Griffiths, D.V. Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering; John Viley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Itasca. Fast Langrangian Analysis of Continua, User Manual; Itasca Consulting Group Inc.: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Griffiths, D.V.; Fenton, G.A. Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2004, 130, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Griffiths, D.V.; Huang, J. Influence of spatial variability on slope reliability using 2D Random Fields. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 2009, 135, 1367–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fenton, G.A.; Griffiths, D.V.; Urquhart, A. A slope stability model for spatially random soils. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), Millpress, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 July 2003; Kiureghian, A., Madanat, S., Pestana, J.M., Eds.; 2003; pp. 1263–1269. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho, S.E. Effects of spatial variability of soil properties on slope stability. Eng. Geol. 2007, 92, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Taha, R.S.; Khajehzadeh, M.; El-Shafie, A. Slope Stability Assessment Using Optimization Techniques: An Overview. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. Bund. Q. 2010, 15, 1901–1915. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, W.; Goh, A.T. Reliability assessment on ultimate and serviceability limit states and determination of critical factor of safety for underground rock caverns. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2012, 32, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tabarroki, M.; Ahmad, F.; Banaki, R.; Jha, S.; Ching, J. Determining the factors of safety of spatially variable slopes modeled by random fields. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2013, 139, 2082–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ji, J. A simplified approach for modeling spatial variability of undrained shear strength in out-plane failure mode of earth embankment. Eng. Geol. 2014, 183, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ji, J.; Chan, C.L. Long embankment failure accounting for longitudinal spatial variation—A probabilistic study. Comput. Geotech. 2014, 61, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jiang, S.H.; Li, D.Q.; Zhang, L.M.; Zhou, C.B. Slope reliability analysis considering spatially variable shear strength parameters using a non-intrusive stochastic finite element method. Eng. Geol. 2014, 168, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, D.-Q.; Qi, X.-H.; Phoon, K.-K.; Zhang, L.-M.; Zhou, C.-B. Effect of spatially variable shear strength parameters with linearly increasing mean trend on reliability of infinite slopes. Struct. Saf. 2014, 49, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Low, B.K.; Phoon, K.-K. Reliability-based design and its complementary role to Eurocode 7 design approach. Comput. Geotech. 2015, 65, 30–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schöbi, R.; Sudret, B. Application of conditional random fields and sparse polynomial chaos expansions to geotechnical problems. Geotech. Saf. Risk V 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goh, A.T.; Zhang, Y. Probabilistic assessment of serviceability limit state of diaphragm walls for braced excavation in clays. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A Civ. Eng. 2015, 1, 06015001. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, L.-L.; Cheng, Y.-M.; Zhang, S.-H. Conditional random field reliability analysis of a cohesion-frictional slope. Comput. Geotech. 2017, 82, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lü, Q.; Xiao, Z.P.; Ji, J.; Zheng, J. Reliability based design optimization for a rock tunnel support system with multiple failure modes using response surface method. Tunneling Undergr. Space Technol. 2017, 70, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rackwitz, R. Reviewing probabilistic soils modeling. Comput. Geotech. 2000, 26, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, X.Z. Trivariate analysis of soil ranking correlated characteristics and its application to probabilistic stability assessments in geotechnical engineering problems. Soils Found. 2013, 53, 540–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Phoon, K.K.; Kulhawy, F.H. Characterization on geotechnical variability. Can. Geotech. J. 1999, 36, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Phoon, K.K.; Kulhawy, F.H. Evaluation of geotechnical property variability. Can. Geotech. J. 1999, 36, 625–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alamanis, N.O. Effect of Spatial Variability of Soil Properties in Permanent Seismic Displacements of Road Slopes. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ribeiro, A.M.; Ribeiro Junior, P.J.; Bonat, W.H. A Kronecker-based covariance specification for spatially continuous multivariate data. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2022, 36, 4087–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dai, H.; Zhang, R.; Beer, M. A new perspective on the simulation of cross-correlated random fields. Struct. Saf. 2022, 96, 102201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tun, Y.W.; Pedroso, D.M.; Scheuermann, A.; Williams, D.J. Assessing multiple slope instabilities with genetic algorithms. Int. J. Sci. Res. Civ. Eng. 2015, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reale, C.; Xue, J.; Pan, Z.; Gavin, K. Deterministic and Probabilistic Multi-Modal Analysis of Slope Stability. Comput. Geotech. 2015, 66, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reale, C.; Gavin, K.; Prendergast, L.J.; Xue, J. Multi Modal ReabilityAnalysis of Slope Stability. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 2468–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, G. Non-parametric generation of multivariate cross correlated random fields directly from sparse measurements using Bayesian compressive sensing and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2023, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiang, Y.; Hui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Peng, L.; Huang, G.; Liu, S. A noveleigenvalue-based iterative simulation method for multi-dimensional homogeneous non-Gaussian stochastic vector fields. Struct. Saf. 2023, 100, 102290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, H.; Zhang, L.M.; Xiao, T.; Li, X.Y. Generation of multivariate cross correlated geotechnical random fields. Comput. Geotech. 2017, 86, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Discretization of geometry A having slope inclination equal to 2:1 (H:V).
Figure 1. Discretization of geometry A having slope inclination equal to 2:1 (H:V).
Applsci 13 09868 g001
Figure 2. Illustrative example of random fields of properties derived using the LAS method: (a) cohesion, (b) friction angle, (c) Young’s modulus, and (d) density.
Figure 2. Illustrative example of random fields of properties derived using the LAS method: (a) cohesion, (b) friction angle, (c) Young’s modulus, and (d) density.
Applsci 13 09868 g002
Figure 3. Spectra of acceleration of the modified earthquake excitations and Eurocode 8 spectra for rock sites for a maximum ground acceleration (PGA) equal to 0.3 g.
Figure 3. Spectra of acceleration of the modified earthquake excitations and Eurocode 8 spectra for rock sites for a maximum ground acceleration (PGA) equal to 0.3 g.
Applsci 13 09868 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of ultimate equivalent shear strain at the end of seismic shaking and inferred failure surface. (Input excitation: Lefkada 2003 record).
Figure 4. Distribution of ultimate equivalent shear strain at the end of seismic shaking and inferred failure surface. (Input excitation: Lefkada 2003 record).
Applsci 13 09868 g004
Figure 5. Evolution of horizontal and vertical displacement in point A (input excitation: Lefkada 2003 record).
Figure 5. Evolution of horizontal and vertical displacement in point A (input excitation: Lefkada 2003 record).
Applsci 13 09868 g005
Figure 6. Probability density of horizontal permanent displacement ux for various values of lx and ly (Weibull distribution).
Figure 6. Probability density of horizontal permanent displacement ux for various values of lx and ly (Weibull distribution).
Applsci 13 09868 g006
Figure 7. Probability density of vertical permanent displacement uy for various values of lx and ly (Weibull distribution).
Figure 7. Probability density of vertical permanent displacement uy for various values of lx and ly (Weibull distribution).
Applsci 13 09868 g007
Figure 8. Probability density of total permanent displacement u for different values of lx and ly (Weibull distribution).
Figure 8. Probability density of total permanent displacement u for different values of lx and ly (Weibull distribution).
Applsci 13 09868 g008
Figure 9. Probability of exceedance of a given value of total permanent displacement u* for different values of lx and ly (Weibull distribution).
Figure 9. Probability of exceedance of a given value of total permanent displacement u* for different values of lx and ly (Weibull distribution).
Applsci 13 09868 g009
Figure 10. Probability density of the coefficient fx = ux/ūx of horizontal permanent displacement for three slopes (ux = horizontal permanent displacement, ūx = horizontal permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
Figure 10. Probability density of the coefficient fx = ux/ūx of horizontal permanent displacement for three slopes (ux = horizontal permanent displacement, ūx = horizontal permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
Applsci 13 09868 g010
Figure 11. Probability density of the coefficient fy = uy/ūy of vertical permanent displacement for three slopes (uy = vertical permanent displacement, ūy = vertical permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
Figure 11. Probability density of the coefficient fy = uy/ūy of vertical permanent displacement for three slopes (uy = vertical permanent displacement, ūy = vertical permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
Applsci 13 09868 g011
Figure 12. Probability density of the coefficient f = u/ū of total permanent displacement for three slopes (u = total permanent displacement, ū = total permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
Figure 12. Probability density of the coefficient f = u/ū of total permanent displacement for three slopes (u = total permanent displacement, ū = total permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
Applsci 13 09868 g012
Figure 13. Probability of exceedance of a given value f* of the coefficient f = u/ū of total permanent displacement for three slopes (u = total permanent displacement, ū = total permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
Figure 13. Probability of exceedance of a given value f* of the coefficient f = u/ū of total permanent displacement for three slopes (u = total permanent displacement, ū = total permanent displacement of homogeneous slope).
Applsci 13 09868 g013
Figure 14. Computed permanent displacements for slope inclination 2:1: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u fitted by Weibull, Extreme Value, and Gamma distributions.
Figure 14. Computed permanent displacements for slope inclination 2:1: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u fitted by Weibull, Extreme Value, and Gamma distributions.
Applsci 13 09868 g014
Figure 15. Computed permanent displacements for slope inclination 4:3: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u fitted by Weibull, Extreme Value, and Gamma distributions.
Figure 15. Computed permanent displacements for slope inclination 4:3: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u fitted by Weibull, Extreme Value, and Gamma distributions.
Applsci 13 09868 g015
Figure 16. Computed permanent displacements for slope inclination 1:1: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u fitted by Weibull, Extreme Value, and Gamma distributions.
Figure 16. Computed permanent displacements for slope inclination 1:1: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u fitted by Weibull, Extreme Value, and Gamma distributions.
Applsci 13 09868 g016
Figure 17. Probability density of computed permanent displacements for slope inclinations 2:1, 4:3, and 1:1: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u (Weibull distribution).
Figure 17. Probability density of computed permanent displacements for slope inclinations 2:1, 4:3, and 1:1: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u (Weibull distribution).
Applsci 13 09868 g017
Figure 18. Probability of exceedance of a given value u* of permanent displacement for slope inclinations 2:1, 4:3, and 1:1: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u (Weibull distribution).
Figure 18. Probability of exceedance of a given value u* of permanent displacement for slope inclinations 2:1, 4:3, and 1:1: (a) horizontal displacement ux, (b) vertical displacement uy, and (c) total displacement u (Weibull distribution).
Applsci 13 09868 g018
Table 1. Mean value and standard deviation of soil properties.
Table 1. Mean value and standard deviation of soil properties.
PropertyMean Value μCoefficient of Variation σ/μ
Cohesion c, kPa300.3
Friction angle φ°, degrees200.2
Dilation angle ψ°, degrees0
Density ρ, kg/m320000.1
Modulus Ε, MPa600.2
Poisson’s ratio v0.30
Table 2. Correlation coefficients of soil properties.
Table 2. Correlation coefficients of soil properties.
Correlation   Coefficient   ρ i j
PropertycφρEν
c1−0.50.50.20
φ−0.510.50.20
ρ0.50.5100
E0.20.2010
ν00001
Table 3. Autocorrelation lengths.
Table 3. Autocorrelation lengths.
Autocorrelation LengthsCases
abc
l x , m204020
l y , m224
Table 4. Historic earthquake records used as excitations.
Table 4. Historic earthquake records used as excitations.
EarthquakeMwR (km)RecrdingComponentPGA (g)
Kalamata (1986)6.012PrefectureHor.0.25
Lefkada (2003)6.410LefkadaTrans.0.60
Kobe (1995)7.220Port IslandHor.0.57
Northrdge (1994)6.730RinaldiHor. 3180.47
Friuli (1976)6.519FRiuliHor.0.35
Table 5. Investigation of spatial variability of soil properties (dx = horizontal length of failure surface and dy = height of failure surface).
Table 5. Investigation of spatial variability of soil properties (dx = horizontal length of failure surface and dy = height of failure surface).
Case Studylx, mly, mdx mdy mlx/dxly/dy
12029029.850.2220.067
24029029.850.4440.067
32049029.850.2220.133
Table 6. Geometric characteristics of investigated slopes.
Table 6. Geometric characteristics of investigated slopes.
GeometryInclination (H:V)Height, mAngle
A 2:12027°
B4:33037°
C1:13045°
Table 7. Mean value and standard deviation of soil properties.
Table 7. Mean value and standard deviation of soil properties.
PropertyMean Value μCoefficient of Variation σ/μ
Cohesion c, kPa500.3
Friction angle φ°, degrees300.2
Dilation angle ψ°, degrees0
Density ρ, kg/m320000.1
Modulus Ε, MPa600.2
Poisson’s ratio v0.30
Table 8. Permanent displacements of slopes A, B, and C for homogeneous soil.
Table 8. Permanent displacements of slopes A, B, and C for homogeneous soil.
GeometryInclination (H:V)FS u ¯ x , m u ¯ y , m u ¯ , m
A 2:12.580.390.350.53
B4:31.710.410.470.63
C1:11.450.760.540.94
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alamanis, N.; Dakoulas, P. Impact of Soil Properties’ Spatial Correlation Lengths and Inclination on Permanent Slope Displacements Due to Earthquake Excitation. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9868. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179868

AMA Style

Alamanis N, Dakoulas P. Impact of Soil Properties’ Spatial Correlation Lengths and Inclination on Permanent Slope Displacements Due to Earthquake Excitation. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(17):9868. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alamanis, Nikolaos, and Panagiotis Dakoulas. 2023. "Impact of Soil Properties’ Spatial Correlation Lengths and Inclination on Permanent Slope Displacements Due to Earthquake Excitation" Applied Sciences 13, no. 17: 9868. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop