Classification of Exergames with Different Types: Perceptual and Physiological Responses in College Students

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors, 

Please review the document.

Thanks. 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This study aimed to investigate the effects of five active video games (AVGs) with different types on physiological and perceptual variables and compare them with each other and resting condition; categorize the AVGs’ physical activity (PA) intensity according to ACSM classification; and investigate the correlation between RPE and enjoyment score within each AVG. These are my comments and suggestions:

Abstract:

The abstract is nicely written with clearly states the purpose of the study.

Line 8: Please proofread the text here

Line 21: That line, the conclusion of the abstract needs re-writing. Something is missing and is not easily understood by the reader.

 

Introduction:

The Introduction section is very well written and you mention the background and importance of the study.

Line 29 and 35: Take care of your syntax

Lines 45 to 48: This part needs to be rewritten.

Line 84 - 86: What do you mean?

Line 95: See the comment in the abstract section

 

Materials and Methods:

Section 2.2. This part is quite odd. You describe the methodology very well later. However, that part is not very well understood by the reader.

Line 154: I can not find the Equation 6.

 

Results:

The results were presented fairly and convincingly. Presenting them in the form of tables and bar graphs allowed a very clear analysis of the information contained in them. The explanations underneath the graphs are very thorough and clear.

 

Discussion:

The discussion section is sufficient and the results are very well reported and compared.

The limitation subsection is very well presented and mentions all the existing limitations of the manuscript.

 

Conclusion:

Line 359: Pay attention to the punctuation

I have included my comments above

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors stated WHO recommendation in lines 29-32 but then state USA numbers in line 32-34 and then again world wide reading from line 34. Complete legend for figure 1 is missing. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors, 

Thanks for your answers, these was satisfactory.

Regards.