Next Article in Journal
Investigation into the Influence of Stress Conditions on the Permeability Characteristics of Weakly Cemented Sandstone
Previous Article in Journal
Analyzing Data Reference Characteristics of Deep Learning Workloads for Improving Buffer Cache Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Circular Bioeconomy and the Forest-Wood Sector: Bridging the Gap between Policies and Disadvantaged Forest Areas
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment and Zoning Control Based on Ecosystem Service Value: Taking Sichuan Province as an Example

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(22), 12103; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212103
by Zhuoting Jiang, Xiaoyu Gan *, Jie Liu, Xinyuan Bi, Ao Kang and Bo Zhou
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(22), 12103; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212103
Submission received: 15 October 2023 / Revised: 30 October 2023 / Accepted: 3 November 2023 / Published: 7 November 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Article presents actual problems with selection of proper methods for ecological management in Sichuan province, taking into account its local specificity. Anyway article appears to have significant deficiencies such as poor results discussion.

Lack of significant findings not only in abstract section, but also in main text (Results section) because many equations were used in order to calculate values the indicators, to present ecological effects in monetary equivalent -Ecosystem Service Value presented in table 2- lack of discussion and presentation of calculated values  in abstract section.

Also main findings need to be mentioned in abstract section: in which geographical sites of this province most of actions/improvements should be done in the future.

Besides, I have following detailed remarks to the article:

1.Improvement of figure 1: Overall stragety => overall strategy

2. Improvement of visibility fig.2. Lack of description in main text, why this figure is needed in this article, what information does it give.

3. Some sections in article need to be re-organised, f.e. figure 3 presents results- remove from section Methods.

4. Due to fact, that figure 5 represent the most important data for further interpretation and  discussions there is strongly need for improvement of visibility of fig. 5

5. In references: point 22, L496 wrong format, Chineese letters.

6. Literature is not well balanced, (19 sources from recent 5 years in it 7 / 2021, 7/2022 and 3/2023) but the 11 sources are older than 5 years; add or replace by the newest one.

5. In references: point 22, L496 wrong format, Chineese letters.
6. Literature is not well balanced, (19 sources from recent 5 years in it 7 / 2021, 7/2022 and 3/2023) but the 11 sources are older than 5 years; add or replace by the newest one.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment and Zoning Control Based on Ecosystem Service Value: Taking Sichuan Province as an Example

1)      Please rephrase line 14-15 its confusing

2)      Please make abstract simple

3)      The introduction system is not well organized. Please make it coherent and organized, also the problem statement and justification section need an improvement. P

4)      Please go through the following article might be helpful in introduction

5)      Can the improve the quality of figure 1

6)      Study area section need sources of citation, also better to include the climatic, geological and soil data

7)      Line 123-125 No need of this please remove

8)      Can the author include research generalization  section in the MS

9)      Can the author a limitation section in this MS

10)   The MS is not well organized and structured. Please organized your MS as Abstract, introduction, Materials and methods , Results, Discussion and conclusion

11)   Please refer to the following articles particularly in discussion and  introduction section  

Yin, L., Wang, L., Huang, W., Liu, S., Yang, B.,... Zheng, W. (2021). Spatiotemporal Analysis of Haze in Beijing Based on the Multi-Convolution Model. Atmosphere, 12(11), 1408. doi: 10.3390/atmos12111408

Yin, L., Wang, L., Zheng, W., Ge, L., Tian, J., Liu, Y.,... Liu, S. (2022). Evaluation of Empirical Atmospheric Models Using Swarm-C Satellite Data. Atmosphere, 13(2), 294. doi: 10.3390/atmos13020294

Chen, J., Liu, Z., Yin, Z., Liu, X., Li, X., Yin, L.,... Zheng, W. (2023). Predict the effect of meteorological factors on haze using BP neural network. Urban Climate, 51, 101630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101630

Wu, B., Quan, Q., Yang, S., & Dong, Y. (2023). A social-ecological coupling model for evaluating the human-water relationship in basins within the Budyko framework. Journal of Hydrology, 619, 129361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129361

Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Guo, D., Zhao, Z., Lin, T.,... Zhang, C. (2022). Underground space use of urban built-up areas in the central city of Nanjing: Insight based on a dynamic population distribution. Underground Space, 7(5), 748-766. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2021.12.006

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

 I am almost satisfied with improvements, which you have made, but the figure 1 should be still improved- the word "strategy" should be used instead of "stragety"

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop