Next Article in Journal
The Estimation of Trapped Modes in a Cavity–Duct Waveguide Based on the Coupling of Acoustic and Flow Fields
Previous Article in Journal
A Lightweight Neural Network-Based Method for Identifying Early-Blight and Late-Blight Leaves of Potato
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Design Method in Wireless Charger for SS Topology with Current/Voltage Self-Limitation Function

Department of Electrical Engineering, Chonnam National University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(3), 1488; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031488
Submission received: 9 December 2022 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 14 January 2023 / Published: 23 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering)

Abstract

:
This study proposes a novel wireless power transfer (WPT) resonance compensation design method based on the SS topology with a self-limitation function that achieves fault tolerance without additional components when the secondary circuit is in a short and open state. Conventionally, WPT compensation topologies have constant current (CC) or constant voltage (CV) output characteristics. The CC and CV characteristics can lead to overvoltage and overcurrent, respectively. Several control systems have been proposed to counter this issue; however, they tend to increase the cost and weight of the system. The proposed topology has a self-limitation function that limits the voltage–ampere output. Here, the wireless charging system was designed after the parameters were obtained using the proposed analysis. The performance of the proposed design was verified by configuring a 400 W experimental prototype and comparing it with the conventional series–series (SS) topology. Experimental results indicated that the system could effectively limit the output voltage and current resulting from open-or short-circuit states.

1. Introduction

Wireless power transfer (WPT) systems are widely applied in various applications such as electric vehicles (EVs), mobile phones, unmanned aerial vehicles, and robots [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. These systems overcome the technical limitations of battery capacities and offer an easier charging alternative to plug-in charging methods during unmanned and autonomous mobility, thereby eliminating the possibility of hazards such as electric shock and leakage from cracked and worn-out cables [9,10].
WPT systems employ inductive power transfer (IPT) and magnetic resonance methods. Most of the WPT devices adopt the IPT charging method owing to its high efficiency. Major studies related to WPT based on IPT have focused on the pad design and the compensation topology of the IPT converter.
In terms of pad design, the studies mainly focused on overcoming the low coupling coefficients of existing circular and rectangular pads. The pad designs with polarity proposed in recent studies offer a higher coupling coefficient k and better consistency in alignment than basic pads [11,12,13,14,15].
Compensation topologies have been proposed to resolve the phase shift caused by the coil inductance of the charging pad. The phase difference between the voltage and current increases the current flowing through the IPT system owing to the increase in circulating current and reactive power, which leads to additional system losses. Various compensation topologies have been presented and analyzed. These topologies are classified into four basic resonant topologies, i.e., the series–series (SS), series–parallel (SP), parallel–series (PS), and parallel–parallel (PP). Furthermore, certain high-order topologies have been proposed to improve the compensation characteristics [16,17,18,19,20]. Compensation topologies are significant parameters that can improve efficiency by minimizing the volt-ampere (VA) ratings. It further influences the constant output characteristics (current or voltage), which are determined by the constant current (CC) or constant voltage (CV) compensation topology structure.
Most IPT systems have either CV or CC output characteristics; thus, the output characteristics can cause overcurrent or overvoltage when charging the battery through the IPT system, which can damage the battery [21,22]. Moreover, when WPT is applied to an automated system, it is difficult to respond immediately to prevent secondary damage in the event of a battery accident. To prevent these problems, most batteries include a battery management system (BMS), which has an internal monitoring function and a control-charging mode. When the state of charge (SoC) is low, the BMS can be in CC mode to avoid overcurrent, and when SoC is high, the BMS changes the CC mode to CV mode to avoid overvoltage. However, applying BMS and telecommunication functions inevitably increases the system’s cost and weight. Thus, it is not suitable for low-cost and low-volume mobility systems such as drones, mobile phones, wireless earphones, and electric bikes. To reduce the cost of controllers in low-cost models, researchers have proposed various safety strategies. It was proposed in [23] that a slot current protection circuit, such as ZnO resistance, be included or a signal from the control sensor be sent to the metal–oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) switch to protect against faults. However, this mechanism offers protection only in the case of a fault, and a BMS is still required, which increases the cost owing to specific components.
Meanwhile, in [24,25], a CC/CV solution via topological access was proposed; in [24], a circuit that adds a coil in the primary pad to achieve the CC/CV mode was proposed, while in [25], a topology based on a high-order compensation topology was proposed. In [26,27,28,29,30], a hybrid topology was proposed to achieve the CC/CV mode by using a switching capacitor. In [26,27], CC/CV control by switching a capacitor between the two topologies was proposed. Further, CC/CV control was proposed in [28] by switching capacitors on the secondary coil. In [29], switching capacitors were proposed for both primary and secondary coils. In [30], a single switching capacitor and a variable operating frequency were proposed. However, these methods are not economically viable. In [24], the addition of a coil was required, and [25,26,27,28,29] are based on high-order topology, which requires additional components. In [26,27,28,29], more switches were required to change the charging mode, while a more complex controller was required in [30]. As these systems invariably cause an increase in cost or weight, they are unsuitable for low-cost WPT battery chargers. Thus far, there has been no reported study on the application of control strategies without including additional components.
In this study, a novel low-cost IPT compensation design method based on SS topology has been proposed. The proposed design method has resonance elements similar to those of the conventional SS design, but the resonance requirements are designed differently. Unlike the CC or CV characteristics of most conventional topologies, the proposed resonance design has a nonlinear converging current and voltage curve. Further, the proposed design method does not need additional control functions and components to prevent current/voltage fluctuations when an open or short state occurs on the secondary side.
This paper is organized as follows: A fundamental circuit analysis is presented in Section 2. The output characteristics are explained according to the load variation in Section 3. A prototype of the proposed design method is experimentally validated on a 400 W prototype. A control method for compensating for changes in output characteristics due to misalignment or tolerance is presented in Section 4. The comparison results of the proposed and conventional SS design methods, and the battery output characteristic results are presented in Section 5. The conclusions of the study are presented in Section 5.

2. Basic Principle

2.1. Fundamentals

Figure 1 shows the diagram of the IPT system. To simplify the circuit diagram, line resistance, core resistance, and parasitic parameters are not shown in this figure. A full-bridge inverter comprising four MOSFETs (Q1Q4) was utilized to convert a direct current (DC) link voltage into an alternating current (AC) square wave voltage. Us is the equivalent AC input voltage of the compensation topology. According to [29], Us can be calculated as follows:
U s = 4 U DC π n = 1 , 3 , 5 sin ( n ϕ ) n
Generally, only the fundamental harmonic (n = 1) is considered in the IPT converter system because high-order harmonics are filtered in the IPT converter circuit, which appear in the high-order harmonics of a high-impedance circuit. M represents the mutual inductance between the two pads. Cr and Cs represent the resonance capacitors in the primary and secondary coils, respectively. As illustrated in Figure 1, a loosely coupled transformer (LCT) works as an ideal transformer model. The coupling coefficient k of the LCT and its effective turn ratio are defined in (2) and (3). A bridge rectifier consists of four diodes (D1D4) to rectify the sinusoidal AC voltage flowing from the IPT converter to the DC battery-charging voltage. RL and Co represent the DC output load and the output filter capacitance, respectively. Uo and Io are the output voltage and output current, respectively. The following equations can be derived from [31]:
k = M L p L s
n = k L p L s
U L = π 2 2 U o I L = 2 2 π I o
where UL and IL represent the root-mean-square (RMS) values of Uo and Io, respectively. Based on (4), the relationship between RL and Ro is given as follows:
R o = 8 π 2 R L
Figure 1. IPT system.
Figure 1. IPT system.
Applsci 13 01488 g001

2.2. Basic Analysis of the SS Topology with Conventional Design

Figure 2 depicts the proposed compensation design method based on the conventional SS topology. The SS topology with conventional design is the most widely applied resonance compensation network. Both the primary and secondary resonant capacitors are completely resonated with primary and secondary inductances. The two compensation capacitors Cp and Cs are designed using the following resonant equations:
L p = L m + L l k p
ω 0 2 L p C p = ω o 2 L s C s = 1
Z 22 S S = R L + j ω 0 L s + 1 j ω 0 C s Z r S S = ω 0 M 2 Z 22 S S Z 11 S S = j ω 0 L p + 1 j ω 0 C r S S + Z r S S
where ω0 is the resonant angular frequency, Lm is the magnetization inductance, and Llkp is the primary leakage inductance. The self-inductance Lp can be divided into Lm and Llkp. In the conventional SS resonance design, a resonance capacitor is resonated with inductance to reduce VA rating and primary circular current. From the corresponding secondary, reflect, and primary parasitic resistances, the output current can be calculated as follows:
I o s s = j ω 0 M i n _ S S Z 22 S S = j U s ω 0 M
Figure 2. Proposed IPT compensation design method.
Figure 2. Proposed IPT compensation design method.
Applsci 13 01488 g002
Figure 3 shows the voltage gain and phase angle of the SS topology with a conventional design for different load resistances. The primary and secondary self-inductances are presented in Table 1, and the resonance capacitor is calculated by (7). As shown in (9) and Figure 3a, the output current is constant, and the voltage is linear to the load resistance. Therefore, CC characteristics can protect short faults, open faults can cause load to overvoltage.
Figure 3b shows the phase angle graph of the SS topology with the conventional design method. Ideally, the SS topology with the conventional design method can be implemented with a zero-phase angle independent of load resistance; however, in practical application, there is a concern that a bifurcation phenomenon may occur wherein the phase is changed depending on the load resistance value due to parasitic components, inductance tolerance, and temperature. In the bifurcation phenomenon, the MOSFET of the inverter is operated in the zero-current switching state, which can lead to switch failure [32].
As illustrated in Figure 3, when the SS topology with the conventional design method is in an open-circuit state, the output voltage rapidly increases.
In order to prevent faults caused by overvoltage and overcurrent, protection and wireless communication devices with low latency are required, which lead to increased cost and volume.

2.3. Basic Analysis of the Proposed Design Method

The SS topology with the proposed design method has a similar configuration to the conventional compensation topology design [33] that resonated with primary and secondary self-inductances. However, the SS topology with the proposed design method divides the primary self-inductance into a magnetizing inductance Lm and a virtual leakage inductance Llkp to compensate for partial resonance. The primary side capacitor resonates with the leakage inductance. The secondary side has the same resonant conditions as the SS topology with the conventional design method that resonated with Ls. The equivalent impedance expressions for the secondary side is provided in (10)–(15). Cr is the capacitance that resonates with Llkp, and Zin is the equivalent input impedance.
C s = 1 ω 2 L s
1 j ω C s + j ω L s = 0
L m = k L p
L l k p = ( 1 k ) L p
C r = 1 ω 2 L l k p
Z i n = j ω L m + ω k L p L s 2 R o
In (15), the imaginary value of the equivalent circuit impedance is always positive, and the proposed topology has inductive loads regardless of the load resistance. Thus, the proposed topology can be operated with zero-voltage switching (ZVS) over the entire load range. ZVS has the advantage of a reduced turn-on loss under MOSFET switching.
The primary current Ip, output current Io, and output voltage Uo, respectively, are given in (16)–(18). As indicated by (17) and (18), the output current and voltage have complex components that show nonlinear output characteristics.
I p = U s Z i n = U s j ω L m + ( ω M ) 2 R o
I o = j ω M U s Z i n   R o = ω M 3 U s ω 2 M 4 + L m R o 2 j M U s L m R o ω 2 M 4 + L m R o 2
U o = I o R o = ω M 3 U s R o ω 2 M 4 + L m R o 2 j M U s L m R o 2 ω 2 M 4 + L m R o 2
In (17), the smaller the load resistance becomes, the more the real part converges and the imaginary part becomes zero. In (18), the larger the load resistance becomes, the more the imaginary part converges and the real part becomes zero.
Table 1 shows the practical parameters of the proposed design method used in Figure 2 and Figure 4, which were measured using an IM 3536 LCR Meter from HIOKI. Figure 4a,b show the graphs of the voltage gains and phase, respectively, from short to open state in the proposed design method. The operation frequency is equal to the resonance frequency, i.e., 85 kHz. As shown in Figure 4a, the voltage gains converge to a constant value under open load.
As shown in Figure 4b, there is a phase difference in the charging area. A small phase difference is required for ZVS but owing to the nature of the proposed design method, the phase increases with the increase in load resistance.

2.4. Analysis of High Order Harmonic Suppression

A prominent function of the compensation topology is that it can be utilized to compensate for the large leakage inductances of the LCT. The compensation topology can work as a passive bandpass filter that only allows the specified resonant frequency component to pass because the resonant networks comprise inductors and capacitors. Therefore, the harmonic components can be attenuated [34]. The proposed design method in this study uses partial resonance with leakage inductance, which may lead to concerns that harmonics cannot be completely eliminated. However, as the proposed design method has the structure of an inductive load whose impedance values increase proportionally with frequency, high-order harmonic components can be sufficiently attenuated. The impedance for filtering the harmonic component current can be explained as follows:
Z s = j ω L s + 1 j ω C s + R o
Z r = ( ω M ) 2 Z s
Z i n = j ω L p + 1 j ω C r + ( ω M ) 2 j ω L s + 1 j ω C s + R o
The secondary impedance Zs, reflected impedance Zr, and input equivalent impedance Zin, respectively, are provided in (19)–(21). In addition, to verify the high-order harmonics suppression, Figure 5 shows the result of comparative simulations. By using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) tool to analyze the input current Ip, simulation results confirm that there are few high-order harmonic amplitudes of Ip. Therefore, the proposed topology can be approximated and computed using the fundamental harmonic approximation (FHA) method.

3. Analysis of Output Characteristics Variation

The SS topology with the proposed design method has a self-limitation characteristic. As indicated by (17) and (18), unlike conventional compensation topologies in which the output voltage and current are constant, the output equation consists of complex structures, and the values of the output current and voltage depend on the load. As the load resistance value fluctuates, the ratio between the reactance and resistance components included in the denominator of the output equation varies. Accordingly, the output characteristic equation is divided into three modes.

3.1. Mode 1: Current Limitation in Case of Short-Circuit

The output load current when the load resistance value is low is provided by (22). Based on (17), when short-circuit RL is zero, the output load current equation becomes similar to that of the conventional SS topology [17]. The output equation is identical to the CC characteristics during short-circuit, and the phase angle is close to zero. Therefore, the proposed design method has the advantages of preventing transient current fluctuation when a short-circuit accident occurs under a load and protecting devices from damage caused by overcurrent.
ω 2 M 4 L m R o 2 I L = 2 2 π I o j 2 2 U s π ω M

3.2. Mode 2: Voltage Limitation in Case of an Open-Circuit

The output load voltage is given in (23), which is based on (18) when the load resistance is infinity. When the load impedance is high, it can be approximated, and the output load voltage has a constant value regardless of the load. In (23) it is implied that, regardless of the coupling coefficient, the proposed topology can apply the desired output voltage according to the inductance design. The proposed topology prevents damage to the insulation and accident due to overvoltage, as no voltage is sustained for more than a fixed period even in the event of an open-circuit accidents without additional components.
U L , max = I L R L = π 2 8 j ω M U s R o j ω L m R o + ( ω M ) 2 π 2 U s 8 L s L p

3.3. Mode 3: Charging Region

The imaginary part of the output-voltage expression cannot be ignored in the charging region. The output voltage and output current exhibit non-linear changes, reaching the maximum-output power state in this interval. The resistance value when the output power reaches its maximum value is shown (24). Once the output power reaches the maximum value with the increase in the load resistance, it starts decreasing. It is necessary to consider the major charging regions of the battery.
R L , P L = P max = ω M 2 L m
Figure 6 presents a graph of the output current, output voltage, and output power of the proposed topology for different loads based on Table 1. Figure 6 shows that the proposed design method has a self-current/voltage limitation function depending on the load fluctuations. The maximum voltage and maximum current are fixed, which prevents the expansion of accidents during short-circuit and open-circuit states.
Thus, the proposed design method does not require additional components, which makes it suitable for low-cost WPT charging systems. In addition to the parameters proposed in Table 1, the short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage can be calculated and designed by modifying inductance, operating frequency, input voltage, and coupling coefficient. Battery management (BM) converter attachment is required to satisfy the output characteristics that vary depending on the battery SoC and the parameter tolerance [35].

4. Experimental Verification

4.1. The Proposed Hybrid IPT Charger’s Parameter Design for CC/CV Modes

After the load-specific characteristics of the proposed design method were verified (as described in Section 3), a design of the primary and secondary pads that satisfied the desired PL, VL, and IL was crafted. The maximum voltage and maximum current are given in (17) and (18), and accordingly, the pad parameters were considered. As indicated by (22), (23), and (24), this had an impact on the ratio of the pad’s mutual and magnetization inductances. Figure 7 shows the 3D geometry design of the LCT, and its detailed design parameters are listed in Table 2.
Considering the voltage and current on the primary and secondary pads, the appropriate wire diameter and distance of insulation between wires were considered. The coupling factor is affected by the size of the pad, the winding design, the external and internal diameters of the winding, and the separation distance. In order to increase the coupling factor, ferrite was added to the primary coil. On the secondary side, the pad is only composed of coils to reduce weight. To validate the analysis, a prototype of the proposed topology and the conventional SS topology was constructed.
The practical parameters employed for the prototype are presented in Table 1 and Table 3. The gap between the primary pad and the secondary pad was 10 mm, which is closer than the normal separation distance of EVs, resulting in a relatively high k of 0.3. The operation frequency was 85 kHz. The duty cycle of the inverter operates at 0.5.
When configuring the experimental environment, the primary capacitor of the SS topology with the conventional design method was modified to work in the ZVS region. Owing to resonance caused by primary pad inductance, the primary capacitor value of the SS topology with the conventional design method was 60.4 nF. The SS topology with the conventional design method had minimum output power, and the output power increased proportionally with resistance value owing to the CC output characteristic.
The load resistance region of the SS topology with the conventional design method was assumed to be from 0.4 Ω to 0.8 Ω as the efficiency and output characteristics must be compared in the same power range. The output current of the SS topology with the conventional design method was determined by the input voltage, primary pad inductance, and secondary pad inductance. To compare efficiency at the same output voltage and current, the operation frequency and duty cycle of the inverter must be controlled. Therefore, in this experiment, only the same duty, switching frequency, input voltage, and rated output power were compared. Moreover, in order to compare the efficiency of the same circuit structure, the SS topology with the conventional design method experiment was conducted without adding a BM converter.

4.2. Experimental Result 1: Verification of Output Characteristic

Figure 8 shows the prototype IPT system manufactured for actual experimental verification. Figure 9a–c show the experimental waveforms of modes 1, 2, and 3 mentioned in Section 3, respectively. In short-circuit experiments, a short resistance with a value of 0.46 Ω was used. Figure 9b shows that mode 2 can demonstrate, based on the electric load, that the resistance is 2000 Ω with output voltage limitation. The maximum current and voltage were almost equal to the theoretical calculations, as illustrated in Figure 9a. Figure 9a,b show that the SS topology with the proposed design method can be verified to demonstrate self-limitation without any other control system or components. The measured short-current in Figure 9a is 24.1 A, which was equal to the value calculated using (18). The measured output voltage in Figure 9b was 35.1 V, which was equal to the value calculated using (17).
As shown in Figure 9, the SS topology with the proposed design method achieved ZVS in all the ranges, thus reducing switching loss. Table 4 shows the results of the prototype experiments (voltage and current in the case of a short-circuit; Po = 100, 200, 300, and 400 W; and an open-circuit). The short-circuit currents were measured by connecting a short resistance.
Figure 10a–c show waveforms from major charging to short-circuit, from major charging to open-circuit, and from short-circuit to open-circuit, respectively. Experimental results were almost consistent with the output equation theories specified in Section 3. Figure 10 shows that the SS topology with the proposed design method prevented overcurrent and overvoltage in dynamic short-circuit and open-circuit, respectively.

4.3. Experimental Result 2: Comparison of Output Characteristics and Efficiency with the Conventional Design Method

Figure 11a,b show the experimental waveform of the SS topology with conventional design. As illustrated in Figure 11, the output current is independent of the load resistance value, and the input current waveform of the conventional SS topology design has a zero-phase angle.
Figure 12 shows the efficiency of the SS topology with the conventional design method and the proposed design method, which were measured using the power analyzer PW6001 from HIOKI. Because of the CC characteristics (minimum output resistance is 0.4 Ω), the SS topology with the conventional design method was measured from 200 W to 400 W. The maximum efficiency of the SS topology with the proposed design method was 89.6% at 350 W. The maximum efficiency of the SS topology with the conventional design method was 87.1%. Owing to the current on the secondary side, the copper loss of the SS topology with the conventional design method was higher than with the proposed design method.
Figure 13 shows a graph of the loss ratio at full load for the two topologies compared experimentally. As the output power characteristics of the SS topology with the proposed design method were different at full load, it shows that the loss values were lower than those of the SS topology with the conventional design method in all sections.
Figure 14 shows a graph of the output characteristics. The x-axis of the graph consisted of a log scale, from short-circuit state to open-circuit state, verifying the theoretical analysis shown in Figure 7. As the resistance increased, the output load voltage almost converged with the designed value obtained by (19). When the secondary side was shorted, the current was limited to the maximum designed value.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a novel WPT system with self-limitation was proposed. In contrast to the conventional design method, which resonates with the self-inductance of a series on the primary and secondary sides, the proposed design method resonates with a leakage inductance on the primary side. Owing to the partial primary resonance, the proposed topology reached ZVS in all load ranges. The output characteristics of the load were analyzed. Under a short-circuit load, the output current converged to the limit, and under an open-circuit load, the output voltage converged to the limit. A prototype was constructed, and the experimental results validated the theoretical analysis. The system delivered approximately 400 W. Under the short-circuit condition, the output current was limited to 24.1 A. Under the open-circuit condition, the output voltage was limited to 35.1 V. Experiment results confirmed that the proposed design method showed reasonable performance in safety and efficiency. Output characteristics of the proposed design method can be calculated and designed for short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage by considering pad inductance, input voltage, and coupling coefficient. The proposed design method can be applied to low-cost WPT charging systems while ensuring safety and efficiency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J., C.-S.S. and D.-H.K.; data curation, S.J.; formal analysis, S.J.; funding acquisition, D.-H.K.; investigation, S.J. and D.-H.K.; project administration, S.J. and D.-H.K.; writing—original draft, S.J.; writing—review and editing, D.-H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program-Automobile industry technology development) (20018829, Vehicle Underbody Charging Type Automatic Charging and Management/Control System Development) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE, Republic of Korea).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, C.-S.; Stielau, O.H.; Covic, G.A. Design considerations for a contactless electric vehicle battery charger. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2005, 52, 1308–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sample, A.P.; Meyer, D.T.; Smith, J.R. Analysis, experimental results, and range adaptation of magnetically coupled resonators for wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2011, 58, 544–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, S.; Mi, C.C. Wireless power transfer for electric vehicle applications. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2015, 3, 4–17. [Google Scholar]
  4. Covic, G.A.; Boys, J.T. Modern trends in inductive power transfer for transportation applications. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2013, 1, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Keskin, N.; Liu, H. Fast charging method for wireless and mobile devices using double-pulse charge technique. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 8–9 May 2014; pp. 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sugino, M.; Masamura, T. The wireless power transfer systems using the Class E push-pull inverter for industrial robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 10–12 May 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, C.; Ma, Z. Design of wireless power transfer device for UAV. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, China, 7–10 August 2016; pp. 2449–2454. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shanmugam, Y.; Narayanamoorthi, R.; Vishnuram, P.; Bajaj, M.; AboRas, K.M.; Thakur, P. A systematic review of dynamic wireless charging system for electric transportation. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 133617–133642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, B.; Dehghanian, P.; Wang, S.; Mitolo, M. Electrical safety considerations in large-scale electric vehicle charging stations. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2019, 55, 6603–6612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Freschi, F.; Mitolo, M.; Tommasini, R. Electrical safety of plug-in electric vehicles: Shielding the public from shock. IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag. 2018, 24, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheon, S.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kang, S.-Y.; Lee, M.L.; Lee, J.-M.; Zyung, T. Circuit-model-based analysis of a wireless energy-transfer system via coupled magnetic Resonances. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2010, 58, 2906–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zaheer, A.; Hao, H.; Covic, G.A.; Kacprzak, D. Investigation of multiple decoupled coil primary pad topologies in lumped IPT systems for interoperable electric vehicle charging. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 1937–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, F.Y.; Covic, G.A.; Boys, J.T. Evaluation of magnetic pad sizes and topologies for electric vehicle charging. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 6391–6407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nguyen, T.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Mi, C.C. Feasibility study on bipolar pads for efficient wireless power chargers. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 16–20 March 2014; pp. 1676–1682. [Google Scholar]
  15. Choi, S.Y.; Huh, J.; Lee, W.Y.; Rim, C.T. Asymmetric coil sets for wireless stationary EV chargers with large lateral tolerance by dominant field analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 6406–6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shevchenko, V.; Husev, O.; Strzelecki, R.; Pakhaliuk, B.; Poliakov, N.; Strzelecka, N. Compensation topologies in IPT systems: Standards, requirements, classification, analysis, comparison and application. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 120559–120580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, W.; Mi, C.C. Compensation topologies of high-power wireless power transfer systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2016, 65, 4768–4778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, W.; Zhao, H.; Deng, J.; Li, S.; Mi, C.C. Comparison study on SS and double-sided LCC compensation topologies for EV/PHEV wireless chargers. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2016, 65, 4429–4439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fang, C.; Song, J.; Lin, L.; Wang, Y. Practical considerations of series-series and series-parallel compensation topologies in wireless power transfer system application. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies: Wireless Power Transfer, Chongqing, China, 20–22 May 2017; pp. 255–259. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, B.; Chen, Y.; Ruan, W.; Liu, H.; Ren, Y.; Mai, R. Current stress optimization for double-sided CLLLC topology-based IPT system with constant output current tolerating Pad misalignments. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2022, 58, 1032–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Puviwatnangkurn, W.; Tanboonjit, B.; Fuengwarodsakul, N.H. Overcurrent protection scheme of BMS for Li-Ion battery used in electric bicycles. In Proceedings of the 2013 10th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, Krabi, Thailand, 15–17 May 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  22. Salerno, D.; Korsunsky, R. Practical considerations in the design of lithium-ion battery protection systems. In Proceedings of the 1998 Proceedings 13th Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA, 15–19 February 1998; Volume 2, pp. 700–707. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lv, X.; Zhu, Z.; Luo, J.; Wang, X.; Yu, Z. Design method of anti-open protection circuit for MCI-WPT based on SS compensation topology. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 3rd Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, Chongqing, China, 11–13 October 2019; pp. 900–904. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen, Y.; Yang, N.; Liu, L.; Dai, R.; He, Z.; Mai, R. Two/Three-coil hybrid topology for WPT systems charging electric bicycles. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA, 17–21 March 2019; pp. 3084–3087. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Song, B.; Li, S.; Kan, T.; Mi, C.C. Fault-tolerant wireless power transfer system with a dual-coupled LCC-S topology. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 11838–11846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rehman, M.; Nallagownden, P.; Baharudin, Z. Design of a new hybrid topology of WPT system to achieve load-independent constant-current and constant-voltage output. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hwang, S.-H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lee, K.-Y.; Kim, D.-H. Reconfigurable hybrid resonant topology for constant current/voltage wireless power transfer of electric vehicles. Electronics 2020, 9, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Liu, Q.; Sun, Y. A hybrid compensation topology for battery charging system based on IPT technology. Energies 2019, 12, 3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Park, S.; Kim, D. A Switching hybrid LCC-S compensation topology for constant current/voltage EV Wireless Charging. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 133924–133935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Park, S.; Kim, D. A hybrid compensation topology with single switch for battery charging of inductive power transfer systems. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 171095–171104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Steigerwald, R.L. A comparison of half-bridge resonant converter topologies. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 1988, 3, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, C.-S.; Covic, G.A.; Stielau, O.H. Power transfer capability and bifurcation phenomena of loosely coupled inductive power transfer systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2004, 51, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Shin, C.; Seo, K.; Park, S.; Kim, D. A comparative study of S-S and LCC-S compensation topology of inductive power transfer systems for EV chargers. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems, Xi’an, China, 3–6 June 2019; pp. 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeng, H.; Yang, S.; Peng, F.Z. Design consideration and comparison of wireless power transfer via harmonic current. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 5943–5952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rahimi-Eichi, H.; Ojha, U.; Baronti, F.; Chow, M.-Y. Battery management system: An overview of its application in the smart grid and electric vehicles. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2013, 7, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 3. Conventional resonance design in the SS topology: (a) voltage gain for different load resistances; (b) phase angle for different load resistances.
Figure 3. Conventional resonance design in the SS topology: (a) voltage gain for different load resistances; (b) phase angle for different load resistances.
Applsci 13 01488 g003
Figure 4. Proposed design methods: (a) voltage gain for different load resistances; (b) phase angle for different load resistances.
Figure 4. Proposed design methods: (a) voltage gain for different load resistances; (b) phase angle for different load resistances.
Applsci 13 01488 g004
Figure 5. Simulation results of Ip harmonics under different load resistances.
Figure 5. Simulation results of Ip harmonics under different load resistances.
Applsci 13 01488 g005
Figure 6. Output characteristics of the proposed topology under different loads.
Figure 6. Output characteristics of the proposed topology under different loads.
Applsci 13 01488 g006
Figure 7. Loosely coupled transformer 3D model.
Figure 7. Loosely coupled transformer 3D model.
Applsci 13 01488 g007
Figure 8. (a) Prototype IPT system for experimental verification in the case of the proposed design method; (b) a prototype coil.
Figure 8. (a) Prototype IPT system for experimental verification in the case of the proposed design method; (b) a prototype coil.
Applsci 13 01488 g008
Figure 9. Experimental waveforms of the proposed topology: (a) Mode 1: short−circuit load; (b) Mode 2: open−circuit load; (c) Mode 3: charging region.
Figure 9. Experimental waveforms of the proposed topology: (a) Mode 1: short−circuit load; (b) Mode 2: open−circuit load; (c) Mode 3: charging region.
Applsci 13 01488 g009
Figure 10. Input/output current and voltage waveforms for the proposed topology are: (a) from charging to short−circuit load; (b) from charging to open−circuit load; and (c) from short−circuit load to open−circuit load.
Figure 10. Input/output current and voltage waveforms for the proposed topology are: (a) from charging to short−circuit load; (b) from charging to open−circuit load; and (c) from short−circuit load to open−circuit load.
Applsci 13 01488 g010
Figure 11. Experimental waveforms of the SS topology with the conventional design: (a) Po = 400 W; (b) Po = 250 W.
Figure 11. Experimental waveforms of the SS topology with the conventional design: (a) Po = 400 W; (b) Po = 250 W.
Applsci 13 01488 g011
Figure 12. Efficiency of the SS topology with conventional design and proposed design under different loads.
Figure 12. Efficiency of the SS topology with conventional design and proposed design under different loads.
Applsci 13 01488 g012
Figure 13. 400 W loss graph of the SS topology with conventional design and proposed design.
Figure 13. 400 W loss graph of the SS topology with conventional design and proposed design.
Applsci 13 01488 g013
Figure 14. Experimental results on the output characteristics from short to open loads of the proposed design method.
Figure 14. Experimental results on the output characteristics from short to open loads of the proposed design method.
Applsci 13 01488 g014
Table 1. Measured parameters of the proposed IPT system.
Table 1. Measured parameters of the proposed IPT system.
SymbolsParametersValues
UsDC link voltage96 V
fOperation frequency85 kHz
Po,maxMaximum-output power400 W
ULLoad voltage range0–35.1 V
IL,shortLoad current under short-circuit23.4 A
kCoupling coefficient0.324
LpPrimary self-inductance56.76 µH
LsSecondary self-inductance6.628 µH
LlkPrimary leakage inductance38.421 µH
CrLeakage resonance capacitor91.1 nF
RLLoad resistance0.46–2000 Ω
RLpAC resistance of Lp58.7 mΩ
RLsAC resistance of Ls19.2 mΩ
Table 2. Designed dimensional parameters of LCT.
Table 2. Designed dimensional parameters of LCT.
ParametersValues
Air gap distance10 mm
Turns per coilNp: 17, Ns: 5
Primary coil dimension180 mm × 92 mm × 3.1 mm (0.12 mm/500)
Primary ferrite plate dimension200 mm × 50 mm × 5 mm
Primary shield dimension244 mm × 136 mm × 2 mm
Secondary coil dimension180 mm × 92 mm × 3.1 mm (0.12 mm/500)
Table 3. Practical parameters of the SS topology with conventional design for comparison.
Table 3. Practical parameters of the SS topology with conventional design for comparison.
Experimental Outputs
PoutShort400300200100Open
VLShort23.4628.2530.0130.8135.1
IL24.1517.7510.566.673.270.02
RL0.51.32.74.59.42000
Table 4. Result of prototype (Charging and fault) experiments.
Table 4. Result of prototype (Charging and fault) experiments.
SymbolsParametersValues
UsDC link voltage96 V
ILOutput load current21.5 A
CrLeakage resonance capacitor60.4 nF
RLLoad resistance0.4–0.8 Ω
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jo, S.; Shin, C.-S.; Kim, D.-H. Novel Design Method in Wireless Charger for SS Topology with Current/Voltage Self-Limitation Function. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031488

AMA Style

Jo S, Shin C-S, Kim D-H. Novel Design Method in Wireless Charger for SS Topology with Current/Voltage Self-Limitation Function. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(3):1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jo, Seungjin, Chang-Su Shin, and Dong-Hee Kim. 2023. "Novel Design Method in Wireless Charger for SS Topology with Current/Voltage Self-Limitation Function" Applied Sciences 13, no. 3: 1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop