Next Article in Journal
Decoupled Control for Double-T Dc-Dc MMC Topology for MT-HVdc/MVdc Grids
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation-Based Reliability Design Optimization Method for Industrial Robot Structural Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Experimental Study on the Flexural Performance of a Steel-ECC Composite Bridge Deck Sheet in the Negative Moment Zone

School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 3777; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063777
Submission received: 4 February 2023 / Revised: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 22 February 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023

Abstract

:
This paper seeks to solve the problem of orthotropic anisotropic steel deck pavement being prone to damage and fatigue, and to study the negative moment performance of steel-ECC concrete composite deck slabs. In this work, four groups of eight specimens were designed for the negative moment four-point bending test study, which included four variables of two ECC slab thicknesses and two bolt spacings. By analyzing the damage mode, crack distribution characteristics, bending load capacity, load-deflection curve, and load-strain curve, the effects of different ECC slab thicknesses and bolt spacings on the bending performance, deformation capacity, and cracking behavior of the steel-ECC composite bridge deck were investigated. The test showed that the combined structure of the ECC and steel plate showed good integrity and good ductility under a negative bending moment, and the damage mode of the member was pure bending of a section of the ECC with concrete cracking damage. When the thickness of the ECC plate increased from 50 mm to 75 mm, the ultimate flexural load capacity of the specimen increased by 92.6%, and when the distance between bolts was reduced from 200 mm to 150 mm, the ultimate flexural load capacity of the specimen increased by 13.4%. The increase in the ECC layer thickness increases the ultimate bearing capacity of the specimen significantly, and the decrease in the bolt spacing increases the ultimate bearing capacity of the specimen less.

1. Introduction

The orthogonal anisotropic steel bridge deck is a bridge deck structure composed of longitudinal and transverse perpendicular longitudinal ribs and transverse ribs together with the deck cover, which has the significant advantages of low structural dead weight and high ultimate load capacity, and it is widely used in key node projects such as cable-stayed bridges and cross-line viaducts at home and abroad. Orthogonal anisotropic steel bridge panels are often used in asphalt concrete pavement, with the advantages of lightweight and good coordination of deformation, which are known as flexible pavement steel bridge panels. However, the special stress characteristics of such decks as well as flexible pavements combined with increasingly heavy traffic have led to varying degrees of disease in most orthotropic anisotropic steel bridge panels, thus affecting the service life of the bridge [1]. Among them, the longitudinal ribs (U-ribs) on the deck support and the transverse diaphragm cause two types of defects due to positive and negative alternating out-of-plane deformations and stresses at the longitudinal rib-deck joint and the transverse diaphragm-deck joint, respectively. According to statistics, depending on the thickness of the bridge deck cover, the two abovementioned problems account for about 50.4% of the total [2].
Reinforcement methods for steel bridge panels mainly include the steel plate reinforcement method, welding repair method, weld remelting method, stop crack hole method, crack closure method, etc. However, with the bridge deck cover and the longitudinal ribs, the horizontal partition between the flat, longitudinal, and horizontal connection and the structural structure are complex; the steel plate reinforcement method of the reinforcement life is short, and the repair effect is poor; the welding repair or remelting method will lead to residual tensile stress in the steel structure, and cannot avoid welding defects that are not conducive to either repair and reinforcement; and the stop crack hole method and crack closure method is only a temporary repair method, and damages the original structure. In recent years, some scholars have tried to combine UHPC (Ultra-High Performance Concrete) and steel bridge slabs with bolts to form UHPC rigid pavement steel bridge slabs with large positive and negative bending deformation capacities. The fatigue life of the bridge deck is significantly improved by reducing the stresses between the deck and the longitudinal and transverse ribs because the bending moment of the inertia of the bridge deck is increased [3,4]. Shao Xudong et al. of Hunan University conducted extensive research on combined steel-UHPC structures and found that the shear performance of the interface is a key factor in the joint work of steel plates and concrete [5,6]. In the process of static load carrying capacity tests and finite element analysis of steel-UHPC, Li Chuanxi et al. focused on the regions with large values of the principal tensile stresses in orthotropic anisotropic steel bridge panels, and found that the peak principal tensile stresses were concentrated at the lower bottom edge of the span deck plate and at the top edge of the panel where it meets the cross-sectional plate [7]. Thus, the importance of the performance of the negative moment zone for orthotropic anisotropic steel bridge slabs is obvious.
All of the abovementioned studies used UHPC materials, while the cubic compressive strength of UHPC can reach more than 150 MPa, which has excessive performance for bridge deck applications [8,9]. In addition, the high cost of UHPC itself, the complex maintenance process, and the difficult removal of UHPC are just some of the many limitations when applying it to bridge decks [10]. Studies have shown that ECC (Engineered Cementitious Composites) have good ductility and crack control, and exhibit good mechanical properties and fatigue resistance when used in combination with steel and steel plates [11]. At the same time, ECC is very suitable for large-area bridge decks due to its low cost [12]. In recent years, studies on steel-ECC composite structures have focused on the performance of pinned shear bonds [13,14], interfacial properties [15,16], and flexural properties [17,18]. Among them, flexural performance research mainly studied ECC and steel beams to form a combined beam, and Jiansheng Fan et al. [17] found that the stiffness of steel-ECC beams was improved by 50% compared to steel-NC beams by flexural tests. In addition, Xue Huiqing et al. [19] considered the tensile properties after incorporating ECC cracking, and each member was able to derive stable load-carrying values. Most of the works above use I-beams as the main structure and the stress distribution also does not match the stress characteristics of orthotropic anisotropic steel bridge plates, while the study of a ECC-steel combined bridge deck plate has not been fully developed. Some experts at Southeast University have also tried to apply it to bridge decks to improve the fatigue life of bridges [20]. However, none of these scholars and experts have considered the setting of shear-resistant connector keys, so no overall combined structure was formed to work together, and no related research was produced thereafter.
This paper takes the steel-ECC combined deck sheet as the research object and conducts a four-point bending static loading test by microcomputer-controlled electro-hydraulic servo long column press so as to test the bending load capacity of a steel-ECC combined deck sheet under a negative bending moment, and it investigates the influence of the deck thickness and bolt spacing of the steel-ECC deck sheet on the bending resistance performance, thereby providing a theoretical and experimental basis for the steel bridge panel to adopt ECC for rigid deck pavement reinforcement.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Design

A total of four groups of eight combined bridge deck slab specimens were designed for this test, including two combinations of ECC slab thickness parameters (50 mm, 75 mm) and two combinations of bolt spacing parameters (150 × 125 mm, 200 × 125 mm), with each specimen having a reinforcement ratio of approximately 2%. The basic parameters of each specimen are shown in Table 1.
The bridge deck slab is 3000 mm long and 500 mm wide, and the steel plate is made of 16 mm Q345q steel; the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is made of Φ10 HRB400 grade reinforcement with a spacing of 150 mm × 125 mm; the bolts are 22 mm in diameter and 35 mm in height, and designed according to the full shear connection. Taking specimen SE-50-150-1 as an example, Figure 1 shows the specimen size and main structure. Other samples are similar in construction but differ only in the combination of design parameters.

2.2. Material Properties

The ECC was prepared by mixing with an on-site mixer and naturally maintained for 28 days. The main materials included P-O42.5 grade ordinary silica cement, 70–120 mesh extra fine quartz sand, 600 kg/m3 silica fume density, coal gangue powder, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fiber, and polycarboxylic acid water reducing agent, which did not contain coarse aggregates. The fiber volume admixture is 2.5%, and the water-cement ratio is 0.3. The mass ratio of cement, silica fume, coal gangue powder, and quartz sand is 1:0.14:0.6:0.87. The material properties of ECC concrete were tested by 500 T universal mechanical testing machine, and the compressive strength and bending strength of concrete were tested by displacement loading, in which the displacement loading rate was 1 mm/min for testing the compressive strength and 0.5 mm/min for testing the bending strength. The tensile strength of concrete was tested by a uniaxial tensile test, and the displacement loading rate was 0.3 mm/min. The dog bone specimens in the tensile test of ECC materials are shown in Figure 2, the basic properties of ECC materials are shown in Table 2, and the basic properties of the steel used in the test pieces are shown in Table 3.

2.3. Component Production

The main fabrication process of the components is shown in Figure 3. It includes reinforcement tying, formwork fabrication, strain gauge pasting, ECC mixing and pouring, maintenance, etc. As the ECC ratio does not contain coarse aggregate in its preparation of the mixing process, the friction generated by the aggregates is not enough to form an effective mixing effect. Therefore, this test pays special attention to the input sequence of raw materials in the ratio: first, the cementitious materials and powder water reducing agent is mixed into the dry mix for 1 min, water and wet mix are then added for 3 min, and, finally, the artificial secondary shredding treatment of PVA fiber mixing is added for 2 min.

2.4. Loading and Testing Solutions

Five percentage gauges were set in the middle of the span, 1/4 span, and pivot point of the specimen. Concrete and steel plate strain gauges were arranged symmetrically in the middle of the span, 1/4 span, and 3/4 span surfaces of the members. Steel strain gauges were also arranged in the middle of the span, 1/4 span, and 3/4 span of the longitudinal reinforcement, and the measurement equipment was arranged as shown in Figure 4.
The distance between the two ends of the deck plate and the lower pivot point is 20 mm, the net span between the two loading points is 2600 mm, and the distance between the two pivot points at the upper end is 800 mm––i.e., the pure bending section of the beam is 800 mm, and the loading diagram is shown in Figure 5. The test is carried out by a “microcomputer-controlled electro-hydraulic servo long column press” to load the bending test, and the specific loading procedure is as follows.
(1) Pre-loading: repeat the 5 kN pre-loading 3 times to eliminate inelastic deformation and poor contact, while ensuring that the instruments are in normal working condition.
(2) Displacement-controlled loading: load at a speed of 2 mm/min until the member is damaged.

3. Analyzing Experimental Phenomena and Results

3.1. Load-Deflection Curve

The load-deflection curves were plotted by taking the average deflection values of 1/4 span and 1/2 span for each group of two specimens, as shown in Figure 6, while the deflection specific data are shown in Table 4. The three working stages of the load-deflection curve of the steel-ECC composite structure are obvious from the curves: the elastic stage, crack extension stage, and yielding stage. The whole composite structure is in the elastic working stage from the beginning of loading the ECC slab before the cracks appear when the steel strain is not large and the growth of both the ECC surface and the steel strain is relatively stable. With the further increase in the load, the reinforcement in the ECC plate starts to enter the yielding stage, and the curve takes the first turn, the deflection curve is out of linear growth, and the whole curve tends to flatten out, at which time it enters the crack expansion stage. As the load continued to increase, the reinforcement reached the yielding point and the deflection curve began to turn into the yielding stage for the second time, the cracks in the ECC plate expanded rapidly toward the bottom of the beam, the beam deflection increased rapidly again, and the load-bearing capacity remained stable. After the test unloading, the whole specimen showed an obvious rebound phenomenon, and the ECC layer did not flake off, indicating that the ECC has high ductility, and the steel plate did not yield during the whole loading period. Finally, a large area of cracks appeared in the flexural-only section of the lower ECC layer, and the load-bearing capacity was lost, indicating damage to the member.
The steel-ECC composite structure can maintain good tensile strength even after being subjected to negative moment stress. This is partly due to the material properties of the ECC material itself, which has high tensile strength, and partly due to its ability to maintain the ultimate tensile strength in its high strain state after reaching the ultimate tensile strength.
In the initial stage of the curve, the linear state is approximately straight, the effect of the ECC thickness variable on the stiffness of the member is significantly greater than the effect of the bolt spacing variable on the stiffness of the member, and the stiffness of the member increases with the increase in the ECC thickness while it decreases with the increase in the bolt spacing. After the first turn of the curve, when the member enters the working stage with cracks, the curve only changes in slope, the influence of each parameter on the stiffness of the structure is still maintained, the influence of the two variables on the stiffness of the member is almost increased (due to the large shear stress of the bolts with larger spacing at this stage and the early deformation, which leads to the relative slip of the ECC and the steel plate and interlaminar damage), and the stiffness decreases.

3.2. Load-Strain Curve

At the beginning of test loading, the specimen deflection increases rapidly with the increase in load, there is no relative slip deformation on both sides, and the strains on the steel and ECC surfaces continue to increase. The load-strain curve on the ECC surface maintains a continuous increase in microstrain at lower load levels due to the unique strain-hardening-force-deformation characteristics of the ECC, and the strain on the ECC surface increases with load only after cracks appear on the surface layer. The surface load-strain curve of the reinforcement remained linear without significant transitions until yielding and was relatively stable after reaching the peak. The load-strain curves for the same ECC thickness combination are very similar, and the difference in load capacity is not significant.
As shown in Figure 7, by comparing the load-strain curves of the ECC and the reinforcement, the tensile strain on the surface of ECC was 1800–2000 με and the surface strain of steel was 900–1000 με before the cracks appeared in the ECC layer, and with the formation of the initial cracks in the members, the load-strain curves of ECC and reinforcement changed significantly. In terms of microstrain growth, both the ECC surface strain and the reinforcement surface strain are basically in linear growth, which is mainly due to the strain-hardening property of the ECC, which allows both strains to increase smoothly at low-loading levels. After the measured strain value of the reinforcement reaches 6000 με and the measured strain value of the ECC concrete bottom surface exceeds 12,000 με, the reinforcement yields and the specimen gradually loses its load-bearing capacity due to concrete cracking. At the yielding stage, the load-strain curve approaches a horizontal line, indicating the good ductility of the member.

3.3. Crack Development Pattern

When the load was increased to about 30% of the ultimate load, numerous transverse small cracks began to appear on the bottom and sides of the ECC of the pure bending moment section. As the load increased, the cracks on the bottom of the pure moment section ECC continued to expand, and small cracks gradually appeared on the bottom surface of the non-pure moment section ECC. When the load was applied to about 70% of the ultimate load, the cracks on the bottom surface of the ECC appeared to expand in width and increase in area, and they were mainly concentrated in the pure moment section. Figure 8 shows the site picture of ECC cracking. As the load continued to be applied, the cracks continued to expand, and, eventually, the large-area cracks crossed the bottom surface of the ECC and the specimens gradually lost their load-bearing capacity. For the negative moment specimens of the steel-ECC composite slab, the damage modes were all crack damage on the ECC bottom slab. The cracks of the ECC bottom slab showed more and smaller widths, which is because the PVE fibers bore most of the tensile stress of the concrete bottom slab through the bridge linkage effect, which redistributes the stress around the cracks and inhibits the crack propagation at the bottom of the ECC. The test cracks and load results are summarized in Table 5.
As shown in Figure 9, the two groups of variables have different effects on the crack width. The influence of the ECC layer thickness is reflected in the magnitude of the load under the same crack width, the cracking load of the specimen with the ECC layer thickness of 75 mm is twice that of the specimen with a thickness of 50 mm, and the difference of the ultimate load is about 25 KN, which indicates that the thicker ECC layer helps to limit the crack width. The influence of the spacing of the bolts is mainly reflected in the cracking load of the beam, and the difference is about 5 KN. The spacing of the bolts is large, the force is more concentrated, the force on each bolt increases, and the ECC layer is pulled and cracked earlier.

3.4. Damage Modes and Finite Element Analysis

Using the classical calculation method combining Eshelby’s equivalent intercalation theory with Mori Tanaka’s model, the ECC material containing PVA fibers was equated to a single dielectric material, and the parameters for homogenization of the composite were calculated as shown in Table 6.
Accordingly, the plastic damage model of ECC material can be determined and its intrinsic structure relationship is determined according to the uniaxial compressive and tensile stress-strain relationship of concrete according to the specification of the “Technical Specification for the Application of Fiber Concrete JGJ/T221-2010”. ABAQUS finite element analysis software was used to perform the test force analysis on the plate members of this test. Among them, the ECC and steel plate were simulated by the C3D8R three-dimensional solid unit, which can greatly improve the computational efficiency by using the integration method of nodes with three translational degrees of freedom and eight nodes forming a unit. The mesh size of the steel plate is 10 mm, and the mesh size of the ECC plate is 5 mm; the steel reinforcement is simulated by the two-node 3D T3D2 of the truss unit and the mesh size is 50 mm, and it is embedded in the ECC in “Embedded” mode, corresponding to the test member SE-50-150-1; and the established finite element model is shown in Figure 10.
The ultimate load calculated by the finite element model is 28.64 kN, which is consistent with the test results, and the error is controlled within 10%. The reason for the error may be that the model calculation of the composite material and the assumptions and simplifications made by the CDP plastic damage model for ECC do not perfectly match the real material, and, in addition, the embedding and connection of the bolts and reinforcement also deviate from the actual situation to some extent. By defining the parameters of the tensile damage factor in the CDP plastic damage model in ABAQUS software, a tensile damage cloud of the structure was obtained, as shown in Figure 11. The tensile damage in the model is very similar to the crack distribution in the test process and results, with cracks appearing early and concentrated in the pure bending section and relatively late and scattered in the non-pure bending section. After the test unloading, the whole specimen showed an obvious rebound phenomenon, but the ECC layer did not peel off as a result, indicating that the ECC has high ductility and the steel plate did not yield during the whole loading period. Finally, a large area of cracks appeared in the flexure-only section of the lower ECC layer, and the load-bearing capacity was lost, explaining the damage to the member.
The CDP model of the combined structure established by the inclusions theory can more accurately simulate the force of the test specimen throughout the test process, the inclusions theory, and CDP damage model, but there are certain errors that include: (1) the Eshelby–Mori–Tanaka single inclusions theory yielded elastic mode tends to be homogeneous, and the actual model of multiple inclusions mixed material properties there is a certain error; (2) the CDP model is a simulation method of isotropic elastic damage superimposed on anisotropic tensile and compressive plastic damage, while the ECC is a non-homogeneous and complex mechanical property, which forms an elastic-plastic material with considerable ductility after the addition of reinforcement; (3) the embedding mode of reinforcement is idealized, and it is not able to effectively simulate the non-negligible adhesive slip between reinforcement and the ECC. However, the ultimate load capacity and crack distribution are roughly similar to the experimental results, which can more accurately simulate the force process of the combined structure under four-point bending.

4. Conclusions

(1) According to the test results of four groups of eight members, the damage mode of the steel-ECC composite deck slab under negative moment loading is relatively stable, and the composite structure composed of the ECC and steel plate shows good integrity and good ductility under a negative moment.
(2) The sensitivity of the main design parameters to the ultimate load capacity of the steel-ECC composite slab is greater for the thickness of the ECC layer than for the spacing of the pegs. When the thickness of the ECC layer is increased from 50 mm to 75 mm, the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the steel-ECC composite structure increases by 92.6%; when the spacing of the bolts is decreased from 200 mm to 150 mm, the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the member increases by 13.4%.
(3) The thickness of the ECC and the spacing of the bolts have important effects on the bending load capacity of the steel-ECC composite members. Increasing the thickness of the ECC layer and reducing the distance between the bolts can increase the cracking load, and the steel-ECC composite deck structure can maintain a certain load-bearing capacity under large deflection.
(4) Through the finite element simulation of plastic damage, the tensile damage in the model matches well with the crack distribution and damage mode in the test process and results, which further confirms the good bending performance of the steel-ECC composite deck plate with a negative bending moment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W. and Z.C.; methodology, S.W. and Z.C.; formal analysis, Z.C., C.L. and Z.Z.; resources, Z.C., C.L. and Z.Z.; data curation, S.W., Z.Z. and Z.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W., Z.C. and C.L.; writing—review and editing, S.W. and Z.C.; visualization, C.L. and Z.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Changsha University of Science and Technology Postgraduate Innovation Project (CX2021SS24).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yi, C.Z.; Xi, L.C.; Lu, K.; Ming, L.Y.; Qiao, L.J. Study on the fatigue damage of a suspension bridge steel box girder and its treatment method. J. Civ. Eng. 2017, 50, 91–100. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, W. Influence of U-Rib Construction and Cross-Sectional Spacer Opening form on Fatigue Performance of Orthotropic Anisotropic Steel Bridge Panels; Southwest Jiaotong University: Chengdu, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Feng, Z.; Li, C.; Deng, S.; Wu, S.; Lei, Z. Comparative analysis of static load carrying capacity of steel-UHPC composite beam deck slabs. J. Xi’an Univ. Archit. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2019, 51, 551–558. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shao, X.; Qu, W.; Cao, J.; Yao, Y. Static and fatigue properties of the steel-UHPC lightweight composite bridge deck with large U ribs. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2018, 148, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Meng, L.; Xu-dong, S.H.A.O.; Jun-hui, C.A.O.; Guang, H.E.; Yu-bao, C.H.E.N.; Xu-dong, Z.H.A.O. Performance of experimental and theoretical analysis on shear short headed studs embedded in UHPC. China J. Highw. Transp. 2021, 34, 191. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, C.; Xiao, H.; He, L.; Shi, Y.; Feng, H.; Pei, B. Experimental study on the longitudinal negative bending performance of flat steel plate—UHPC composite bridge decks. Eng. Mech. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Nie, J.; Feng, Z.; Tan, J. Experimental study of UHPC local pressure performance and bearing capacity calculation formula. J. Civ. Eng. 2022, 55, 36–46+93. [Google Scholar]
  8. Su, Y.; Luo, B.; Luo, Z.; Huang, H.; Li, J.; Wang, D. Effect of Accelerators on the Workability, Strength, and Microstructure of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. Materials 2021, 15, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liao, S.; Wu, N.; Lu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Li, L. A Review on the Preparation and Performance of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second National Symposium on Modern Structural Engineering, Xuzhou, China, 16–31 July 2022. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kakuma, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Hayashikawa, T.; He, X. Fatigue analysis of ECC-steel composite deck under wheel trucking load. Procedia Eng. 2011, 14, 1838–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shen, X. Application of high ductility cementitious composites (ECC) in bridge deck pavement projects. Highw. Traffic Technol. 2018, 34, 56–60+65. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, F.; Wu, J.; Cao, X.; Bi, Y.; Song, J.; Guan, Y. Experimental study on shear resistance of pins in steel-ECC composite bridge decks. Build. Struct. 2020, 50, 757–761. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tian, Q.; Du, X. Experimental study on the launch of high performance concrete composite pavement with short pegs. Bridge Constr. 2016, 46, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shang, X.; Lu, Z. Research progress on the interfacial adhesion performance of ECC and concrete. Concrete 2015, 305, 54–58. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rana, M.M.; Lee, C.K.; Al Deen, S. 08.50: A study on the bond stress-slip behavior between engineered cementitious composites and structural steel sections. Ce/papers 2017, 1, 2247–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fan, J.; Shi, Z.; Xi, S.; Nie, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z. Experimental study on the bending performance of steel-ECC composite beams in the negative moment region. J. Civ. Eng. 2017, 50, 64–72. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fan, J.; Gou, S.; Ding, R.; Zhang, J.; Shi, Z. Experimental and analytical research on the flexural behaviour of steel–ECC composite beams under negative bending moments. Eng. Struct. 2020, 210, 110309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xue, H.; Deng, Z. Experimental study and theoretical analysis of bending performance of HRECC beams. J. Civ. Eng. 2013, 46, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, Z. Study on Self-Healing Mechanism and Fatigue Damage of High Ductility Cementitious Material Pavement of Steel Bridge Deck; Southeast University: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, P. Mechanical Properties of Highly Ductile Concrete with Different Fly Ash Admixtures at Sub-High Temperatures. J. Southeast Univ. 2020, 50, 831–836. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Steel-ECC composite bridge deck construction diagram (Unit: mm).
Figure 1. Steel-ECC composite bridge deck construction diagram (Unit: mm).
Applsci 13 03777 g001
Figure 2. Uniaxial tensile test.
Figure 2. Uniaxial tensile test.
Applsci 13 03777 g002
Figure 3. The main production process of the component.
Figure 3. The main production process of the component.
Applsci 13 03777 g003
Figure 4. Strain Gauge Location Diagram.
Figure 4. Strain Gauge Location Diagram.
Applsci 13 03777 g004
Figure 5. Test loading site diagram.
Figure 5. Test loading site diagram.
Applsci 13 03777 g005
Figure 6. Load-deflection curve. (a) 1/2 span; (b) 1/4 span.
Figure 6. Load-deflection curve. (a) 1/2 span; (b) 1/4 span.
Applsci 13 03777 g006
Figure 7. Load-strain curve. (a) ECC surface; (b) Reinforcement surface.
Figure 7. Load-strain curve. (a) ECC surface; (b) Reinforcement surface.
Applsci 13 03777 g007
Figure 8. ECC cracking photo.
Figure 8. ECC cracking photo.
Applsci 13 03777 g008
Figure 9. Load-crack width curve. (a) Group 1; (b) Group 2.
Figure 9. Load-crack width curve. (a) Group 1; (b) Group 2.
Applsci 13 03777 g009
Figure 10. Finite element model.
Figure 10. Finite element model.
Applsci 13 03777 g010
Figure 11. Tensile damage cloud.
Figure 11. Tensile damage cloud.
Applsci 13 03777 g011
Table 1. The grouping of the test specimens.
Table 1. The grouping of the test specimens.
GroupSymbolThe Thickness of ECC/mmBolts Spacing/mm
1SE-50-150-150150
SE-50-150-250150
2SE-50-200-150200
SE-50-200-250200
3SE-75-150-175150
SE-75-150-275150
4SE-75-200-175200
SE-75-200-275200
Table 2. Basic properties of ECC concrete.
Table 2. Basic properties of ECC concrete.
Compressive Strength/MPaFlexural Strength/MPaTensile Strength/MPaElastic Modulus/GPaPoisson’s Ratio
5022.65.234.50.2
Table 3. Mechanical properties of steel materials.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of steel materials.
Type of SteelElastic Modulus/GPaYield Strength/MPaTensile Strength/MPaRemark
Q345q200375516Test value
HRB400195466584Test value
Bolts200300380Manufacturers provide
Table 4. Summary of test deflection results.
Table 4. Summary of test deflection results.
Symbol1/2 Span Maximum Deflection/mm1/4 Span Maximum Deflection/mm
SE-50-150-1125.6283.56
SE-50-150-2124.5281.43
SE-50-200-1111.9676.13
SE-50-200-2112.5474.62
SE-75-150-196.2166.46
SE-75-150-295.4966.24
SE-75-200-188.3462.07
SE-75-200-290.5461.01
Table 5. Summary of test cracks and load results.
Table 5. Summary of test cracks and load results.
SymbolFcrack/KNFmax/KN
SE-50-150-17.426.2
SE-50-150-27.227.4
SE-50-200-16.422.5
SE-50-200-26.721.3
SE-75-150-115.249.1
SE-75-150-214.651.6
SE-75-200-113.444.5
SE-75-200-213.544.7
Note: Fcrack is the cracking load, Fmax is the ultimate load.
Table 6. Performance parameters of ECC composites after homogenization.
Table 6. Performance parameters of ECC composites after homogenization.
MaterialsDensity/(kg·m−3)Elastic Modulus/GPaPoisson’s Ratio
PVA-ECC2213350.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Z.; Wang, S.; Zeng, Z.; Li, C. An Experimental Study on the Flexural Performance of a Steel-ECC Composite Bridge Deck Sheet in the Negative Moment Zone. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063777

AMA Style

Chen Z, Wang S, Zeng Z, Li C. An Experimental Study on the Flexural Performance of a Steel-ECC Composite Bridge Deck Sheet in the Negative Moment Zone. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(6):3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063777

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Zhuoyi, Shengqi Wang, Zhenhai Zeng, and Chuanxi Li. 2023. "An Experimental Study on the Flexural Performance of a Steel-ECC Composite Bridge Deck Sheet in the Negative Moment Zone" Applied Sciences 13, no. 6: 3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063777

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop