Intelligently Counting Agricultural Pests by Integrating SAM with FamNet
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe paper accurately describes how a TopK matching algorithm to propagate accurate labels and the forgetting mechanism can significantly improve the FamNet baseline model.
The dataset, however, includes the description of the images but the authors do not specify why these conditions were chosen. For example, in section 2.1, the authors state "Images of citrus psyllids under different natural light intensities were captured during three time periods: 9:00-11:00, 14:00-15:00, and 17:00-18:00 every day.". Does this represent good or bad conditions?
The proposal of a system called Segment Assist in Count (SAM) for counting with the assistance of FamNet for a small dataset of RGB images is interesting. Also, the authos bring valuable insights on how the system can be improved and its limitations.
Comments on the Quality of English Language
I suggest a minor english revision to make the text more readable, but it can be published as is.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors1. The introduction section needs to be refined. For example, the 4th to 8th sentences in Paragraph 1 talk about relevant studies on counting pests, which should be placed in Paragraph 3. "Subsequently" in Paragraph looks odd as the Ferentinos paper was published in 2018 after the Li paper. Paragraph 4 also appears abruptly - it is better to add one sentence explaining why large language models are relevant. The citation for "Can sam count anything?" should be placed just at the end of the sentence.
2. "Count Every Thing" model is used interchangeably with FamNet in both text and figures without a clear explanation. It is better to use a consistent term or add a sentence to explain this.
3. How do you determine the value of K in TopK tag matching? This is not clearly discussed in the manuscript.
4. "Figure 1" at the end of Paragraph 2 in Section 2.1 is probably "Figure 2" - please confirm.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf