Next Article in Journal
Green Wave Control Model Simultaneously Considering Passenger Cars and Buses in Closed Road Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Advanced and Potential Methods for Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Avocado Peel—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
On Alpha-Expansion-Based Graph-Cut Optimization for Decoder-Side Depth Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploration of Wendan Pomelo (Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr. cv. Wentan) Peel from Four Different Growing Regions by Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Bioactivity Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Different Pretreatments on the GABA Content of Germinated Brown Rice

Department of Food Science, National Ilan University, Number 1, Section 1, Shen-Lung Road, Yilan City 260007, Yilan County, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(13), 5771; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135771
Submission received: 28 May 2024 / Revised: 24 June 2024 / Accepted: 27 June 2024 / Published: 2 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Chemistry, Analysis and Innovative Production Technologies)

Abstract

:
Brown rice germination increases γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels and enhances its antioxidant activity. In this study, Kaohsiung 145 brown rice was used as the raw material, and soaked in various solutions for 6 h before being processed with either high-pressure processing (HPP) or ultrasonic treatment to increase the GABA content. The GABA and antioxidant components of brown rice were analyzed after 42 h of germination and subsequent air-drying to obtain a moisture content of 14%. The results showed that non-germinated brown rice had GABA at 7.10 mg/100 g and treatment with various soaking solutions (0.1% CaCl2, 0.1% Glu, 0.2% CaCl2, and 0.2% Glu) increased GABA contents. Specifically, 0.1% CaCl2 and 0.1% Glu exhibited higher GABA content, at 42.51 and 44.64 mg/100 g. Furthermore, the GABA content increased synergistically when combined with HPP (100 MPa, 10 min) and ultrasonic (20 min) treatments after soaking. The results showed that the GABA contents in germinated rice were the greatest after ultrasonic treatment, followed by HPP treatment, and the least with only soaking treatment. The treatments with 0.1% CaCl2 and 0.2% Glu combined with ultrasonic processing for 20 min resulted in the highest GABA content at 102.38 and 110.88 mg/100 g, respectively. Finally, 0.1% CaCl2 with ultrasonic treatment for 20 min was chosen, as it demonstrated a considerable improvement in total polyphenols content and DPPH scavenging abilities, as seen by improved scores in subsequent taste evaluations.

1. Introduction

Brown rice is regarded as a healthier choice than polished white rice because it retains more germ and bran layers during processing, maintaining dietary fiber, vitamins, plant sterols, and bioactive components such as GABA [1]. However, brown rice is rarely consumed as a staple food because of its dark appearance and hard texture. The germination of brown rice can be used to improve its taste and further enhance its nutritional value and health functions [2]. In addition, brown rice germination can improve water absorption, cooking gelatinization quality, and hence, brown rice texture. Kim et al. [3] reported that the water absorption stage of brown rice took 8 h, and moisture content increased from 15.9% to 36.8% after 48 h of germination. The sprouting ratio increased to 97% at 32 h.
Brown rice germination can enhance the nutritional value and bioactive components, including total polyphenols, and flavonoids, to increase antioxidant activity [4,5]. Both γ-oryzanol and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) can be improved by germination and fermentation [6,7]. GABA is widely present in both animals and plants, where it serves critical functions. In plants, GABA not only regulates the internal environment to cope with biotic/abiotic stimuli, but it also serves as a signaling molecule. When plants are stimulated externally, GABA can perform a variety of tasks, including regulating the carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio [8], plant defense [9], and phenolic compound accumulation [10]. In animals, GABA serves a variety of physiological functions, including reducing blood stress [11], improving sleep [12], and relieving stress [13]. Consequently, functional foods rich in GABA, such as tea, beverages, and dairy products, have gained popularity in many countries [14].
GABA metabolism occurs in the cytoplasm and is primarily divided into two pathways: GABA shunt and polyamine degradation. The GABA shunt is the primary synthetic pathway, producing 70% of GABA under anaerobic conditions [15]. The GABA shunt involves the irreversible decarboxylation of cytoplasmic L-glutamic acid at the α position by glutamate decarboxylase (GAD, EC 4.1.1.15), resulting in GABA. Inside plant cells, Ca2+ can bind to its receptor protein, calmodulin (CaM), initiating the response. As the Ca2+ concentration increases, active enzymes known as Ca2+/CaM complex promote production. Baum et al. [16] postulated that GAD, which is involved in GABA production, is a binding protein (CaM) that can be activated by Ca2+ and CaM, hence increasing GAD activity and thus metabolizing more GABA content.
High-pressure processing (HPP), also known as high hydrostatic pressure processing or ultra-high-pressure processing, is an emerging non-thermal food preservation technique. The primary purposes of HPP are microbial inactivation, effectively eliminating hazardous pathogens or spoilage microorganisms present in food, and altering the characteristics of food. HPP can change the texture, appearance, and flavor of food. Moreover, HPP can cause cold gelatinizing effects, imparting unique properties to food and improving food quality [17]. Xia et al. [18] investigated the effect of HPP on GABA in germinated brown rice and found that treating germinated brown rice at 300 MPa for 10 min increased the GABA content by 45.16%. The HPP conducted at 100 MPa increased the GABA content in germinated brown rice, which can be attributed to the stimulation of glutamate metabolism, as glutamate is a precursor of GABA [19,20,21]. Therefore, combining germination and HPP treatment can accelerate GABA and glutamate metabolism pathways, resulting in increased GABA content.
Ultrasonication, an emerging processing technique, is used in the food industry and biotechnology processes such as filtering, extracting, and degassing [22]. The formation of cavities (cavitation) in liquids, followed by the rise and collapse of air bubbles, results in cavitation microstreaming, which causes pressure and velocity changes in the fluid and generates fine jets [23]. These actions can be used to enhance the yield of bioactive compounds (including primary and secondary metabolites) in plant-based foods. Yang et al. [24] studied the use of ultrasonic treatment to improve the taste and nutrition of soybeans, finding that soaking followed by (40 kHz, 300 W) for 30 min improved the GABA content in soybean sprouts by 43.4%. The findings revealed that ultrasonication improved water absorption, total phenolic accumulation, energy metabolism, lipid metabolism, and protein hydrolysis in brown rice, hence affecting GABA content. Ding et al. [25] used ultrasonication on red rice at various stages of germination and found that ultrasonication for 5 min after 66 h of germination resulted in a GABA content of 75.82 mg/100 g, which was 69.2% higher than that of red rice germinated for 72 h, implying that ultrasonic treatment could be a novel method to stimulate seed germination and accumulate bioactive compounds such as GABA and riboflavin (vitamin B2).
The objective of this study was to use organically grown Kaohsiung 145 brown rice as raw material, soak it in various soaking solutions for 6 h, and then apply HPP and ultrasonic treatment to continue germination at 25 °C for 36 h. The germinated brown rice was dried by 35 °C cold air drying and analyzed for GABA content, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant capacity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Calcium chloride, L-2-aminopentanedioic acid, 4-aminobutanoic acid, 3,4,5-trihy-droxybenzoic acid (gallic acid), sodium carbonate, trichloroalumane, o-phthalaldehyde (OPA), 2-sulfanylethan-1-ol, boric acid, N,N-diethylethanamine, ethanoic acid, and oxolane were purchased from Nippon Soda (Osaka, Japan). Quercetin (2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxychromen-4-one), 2,2-diphenyl-1-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) hydrazine (DPPH), ascorbic acid ((5R)-[(1S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-3,4-dihydroxyfuran-2(5H)-one), Folin & Ciocalteus phenol reagent, BHA (2-tert-butyl-4-methoxyphenol), and sodium acetate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Acetonitrile was obtained from Avantor (Radnor, PA, USA), and methanol was purchased from Spectrum Chemical (New Brunswick, NJ, USA). All other reagents used were of analytical or reagent grade.

2.2. Preparation of Germinated Brown Rice with Various Soaking Solutions

Brown rice grains (Kaohsiung 145) were obtained from Colim Spring Rice (first rice growing season of 2022, Yilan, Taiwan). In polypropylene (PP) boxes, distilled water was poured, and approximately 500 g of brown rice was weighed to achieve a rice-to-water ratio of 1:1. The brown rice was then soaked in 0.1%/0.2% calcium chloride and 0.1%/0.2% L-glutamic acid solutions separately for 6 h at 25 °C. After soaking, the excess moisture was drained, and the brown rice was vacuum-sealed using nylon/linear low-density polyethylene vacuum bags (NY/LLDPE).

2.3. Physical Pretreatments of HPP or Ultrasonic in Germinated Brown Rice

Following the methodology outlined by Wu et al. [26], after germinated brown rice was soaked for 6 h, the HPP (600 MPa/6.2 L, Kuntec International Co., Ltd., Yunlin, Taiwan) was carried out at 100 MPa for 10 min. In addition, following the methodology outlined by Hung and Chen [27], the soaked brown rice could also undergo ultrasonic (DC-600H, Delta Ultrasonic Co., Ltd., New Taipei, Taiwan) treatment at a power intensity of 400 W for 20 min. Then, the brown rice was drained of excess moisture and spread evenly in the plastic PP box. It was then incubated at 25 °C for 36 h for germination (total duration of 42 h).

2.4. Cold Air-Drying Germinated Brown Rice

The 1 kg of germinated brown rice was placed in a 35 °C cold air-drying machine (YK-112 RS, Zhudian Hsing Industries Co., Ltd., Taichung, Taiwan) until its moisture content decreased to below 14% on a wet basis. After drying, the germinated brown rice was allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for 2 h before being packed into Ziplock bags and stored in a 4 °C refrigerator for subsequent experimental analysis. The weight and surface temperature changes of the germinated brown rice during drying were recorded to plot the heating and drying curves.

2.5. Moisture Content Determination

The method specified in AACC [28] was followed. Five grams of germinated brown rice wet sample weight (Wi) was placed in a pre-weighed aluminum dish and placed in a 105 °C oven (Channel DCM 45, Kehua Co., Ltd., Yilan, Taiwan) until constant weight (Wo) was achieved. Three replicates were performed for each treatment, and the moisture content on a wet basis (w.b.) was calculated using the following formula.
M o i s t u r e   c o n t e n t   ( % ) = W i W o W i × 100 %  

2.6. Color Determination

A colorimeter (Sph900, ColorLite Gmbh, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany) was used to measure the L*, a*, and b* values of samples subjected to various processing methods. Each sample was measured 6 times, and the average values were taken to compare the color differences between different treatments. Here, L* represents brightness, black (0) to white (100); a* represents redness (+) to greenness (−); and b* represents yellowness (+) to blueness (−).
The measurement range of Delta E (△E) is between 0 and 100, where values closer to 0 indicate a smaller color difference, while 100 indicates complete distortion. L*, a*, and b*, respectively, represent the brightness, red–green color, and yellow–blue color of the control group of ungerminated brown rice; L1*, a1*, and b1* represent the values in the experimental group of germinated rice.
E = ( L * L 1 * ) 2 + ( a * a 1 * ) 2 + ( b * b 1 * ) 2

2.7. Water Absorption Percentage Determination

Take 100 g (Wi) of dried brown rice and soak it in room temperature water for 0–6 h. Drain off the water and weigh the rice every hour. Observe the weight change (Wf) due to water absorption during the soaking period, and calculate the percentage increase in weight of the soaked brown rice.
Water   absorption   ( % ) = W f W i W i × 100 %

2.8. γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Content Determination

Following the methodology outlined by Le et al. [29], dried germinated brown rice powder (5 g) was mixed with 25 mL of reverse osmosis (RO) water and subjected to ultrasonic extraction for 2 h at room temperature using a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:5. Subsequently, the sample was centrifuged at 6000 rpm (3870× g) for 15 min (CB-2060, Hsiangtai Precision Machine Co., Ltd., New Taipei, Taiwan), and the supernatant was collected. The centrifugation step was repeated at 10,000 rpm (8050× g) for 10 min (MCD-259, Hsiangtai Precision Machine Co., Ltd., New Taipei, Taiwan) to obtain the supernatant for further analysis. The supernatant (2 mL) was transferred to a 2 mL Eppendorf tube and reacted with 10 µL of derivatization reagent (OPA) for 2 min. The derivatizing agent (OPA) was prepared by dissolving in acetonitrile and adding 2-mercaptoethanol and boric acid buffer. The reaction mixture was then drawn into a syringe, filtered through a 0.22 µm PVDF membrane, and injected into an HPLC (Waters, MA, USA) sample vial for γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) quantification. The obtained sample concentrations were interpolated into the standard curve of GABA (y = 33,714x − 6592.8; R2 = 0.997) over a concentration range of 0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/L, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.88 mg/L and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 2.65 mg/L, to convert them into GABA concentrations.
The HPLC system conditions were as follows: Phase A, 8.0 g of crystalline sodium acetate was weighed and diluted to 1000 mL with water, then 220 μL of triethylamine was added, stirred, and the pH was adjusted to 7.2 using 5% acetic acid, followed by the addition of 5 mL of tetrahydrofuran; Phase B, 8.0 g of crystalline sodium acetate was weighed and diluted to 1000 mL with water, the pH was adjusted to 7.2 using 2% acetic acid, then the sodium acetate solution was mixed with acetonitrile and methanol in a volume ratio of 1:2:2; the HPLC mobile phase was shown in the following Table 1; the separation column employed was Ascentis® C18 (25 cm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA); the detection wavelength was UV 338 nm, flow rate was 1 mL/min, and column temperature was 25 °C; the injection volume was 10 µL; and GABA retention time was 22 min. Data processing was performed using the QChrom data processing system (Scientific Information Service Co., Ltd., New Taipei, Taiwan).

2.9. Total Polyphenols Content Determination

Referring to the method outlined by Lin and Tang [30] for the quantification of total polyphenols, dried germinated brown rice powder (2.5 g) was accurately weighed and mixed with 50 mL of 95% ethanol. The mixture was subjected to ultrasonic extraction for 20 min at room temperature, using a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:20. Subsequently, the sample was centrifuged at 6000 rpm (3870× g) for 15 min (CB-2060, Hsiangtai Precision Machine Co., Ltd., New Taipei, Taiwan), and the supernatant was collected for further analysis. For the subsequent analysis, 0.2 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 1 mL of Folin & Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent and 0.8 mL of 7.5% sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) solution. The mixture was then allowed to react in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 765 nm using a spectrophotometer (CT-2700, Jiancheng Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan). The obtained absorbance values were then compared to a standard curve of gallic acid (y = 0.0084x − 0.0889; R2 = 0.9925) for the quantification of gallic acid equivalents in the sample.

2.10. Flavonoids Content Determination

Following the method described by Lin and Tang [30] for the quantification of flavonoids, dried germinated brown rice powder was extracted as in session 2.9 for TPC determination. For the TFC analysis, 0.2 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 1 mL of 2% AlCl3·6H2O-MeOH solution and thoroughly mixed. The mixture was then allowed to react in the dark at room temperature for 10 min. Absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 430 nm using a spectrophotometer (CT-2700, Jiancheng Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan). The obtained absorbance values were then compared to a standard curve of quercetin (y = 0.0292x − 0.0051; R2 = 0.9999) for the quantification of quercetin equivalents in the sample.

2.11. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity Determination

Based on the method outlined by Lin et al. [31] for evaluating the scavenging activity of DPPH radicals, the following steps were followed.
The supernatant of the extraction described in Section 2.9 was then concentrated under reduced pressure at 50 °C and re-dissolved in 95% ethanol to achieve a concentration of 20 mg/mL for subsequent analysis.
DPPH assay: A total of 2 mL of the prepared 20 mg/mL sample solution was combined with 2 mL of 0.2 mM DPPH-MeOH solution. The mixture was allowed to react in darkness at room temperature for 30 min. After incubation, the absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at a wavelength of 517 nm with a spectrophotometer (CT-2700, Jiancheng Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan). The scavenging activity of DPPH radicals was calculated using a formula. Vitamin C-RO and BHA-MeOH at a concentration of 20 mg/mL were employed as control groups.
This method facilitates the assessment of the scavenging activity of DPPH radicals in germinated brown rice samples.
S c a v e n g i n g   D P P H   f r e e   r a d i c a l s = A B S b l a n k A B S s a m p l e A B S b l a n k × 100 %

2.12. Analysis of Taste Value

The germinated brown rice was sent to the East District Branch of the Agriculture and Food Agency, Yilan County, for taste analyzer analysis. The principle of the taste analyzer (TM-3500, Shizuoka Seiki Co., Ltd., Fukuroi-shi, Japan) involves using near-infrared transmission to measure the moisture content, protein content, amylose content, free fatty acids, and taste value of the control brown rice and experimental sprouted brown rice at continuous wavelengths ranging from 500 nm to 1010 nm.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

The experimental results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis System Enterprise Guide (SAS EG, Cary, NC, USA) version 9.4 software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) were employed for significant difference analysis, comparing the means of each group at a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Soaking on Brown Rice Germination

It was ensured that the brown rice had sufficient moisture for germination after water absorption. Figure 1 shows the water absorption curve of organic brown rice (Kaohsiung No. 145) at room temperature. After 1 h of soaking, there was a significant rise in water absorption, with a ratio of 16.5%. After 6 h of soaking, the water absorption curve flattened out, with a water absorption ratio of 27.1%, and the moisture content of brown rice was approximately 35%, which was conducive to microbial growth and may lead to deterioration and unpleasant odors. Therefore, drying was used to terminate the germination process and reduce moisture content for preservation and analysis.
Figure 2 exhibits photos of germinated brown rice at different germination stages. At 36 h, sprouts develop, and then they reach a length of about 0.2 cm by 42 h, almost half the length of the rice grain. For the subsequent drying operation, this experiment selected a germination time of 42 h. Yen et al. [32] mentioned that if the sprout length of germinated brown rice exceeds 0.3 cm, it tends to fall off during drying, causing undesirable appearance issues. The sprout length of germinated rice was controlled to keep it below 0.3 cm.
The study examined the GABA content of Taichung Sen 10 brown rice at various germination times and found that brown rice germinated at 25 °C for 42 h also had the highest GABA content, which was three times greater than that of non-germinated brown rice [32].
Figure 3 shows the drying and temperature curves of 1 kg of germinated brown rice placed in a 35 °C cold air dryer. Germinated brown rice had a temperature of about 30 °C. At the end of germination, germinated brown rice had a moisture content of 0.53 g water/g dry material (dry basis, d.b.). After 8 h of drying, the moisture content was reduced to less than 0.18 g water/g DM, allowing for easier preservation and analysis. The moisture content of germinated rice should be kept below 15% (wet basis, approximately 0.18 g water/g DM on a dry basis) to prevent spoilage and ensure long-term storage stability [33].

3.2. Effect of Various Soaking Solutions on GABA and Antioxidants of Germinated Brown Rice

According to previous studies, soaking treatment can increase GABA and bioactive compound content [34]. Table 2 indicates the GABA content of germinated brown rice after various soaking solutions. When ungerminated, the Kaohsiung No. 145 brown rice contained only 7.10 mg/100 g of GABA. Following 42 h of germination treatment, the GABA content increased to 22.30 mg/100 g. Moreover, soaking treatments with 0.1% CaCl2 and 0.1% glutamate (Glu) solutions further increased GABA content to 42.51 and 44.64 mg/100 g, respectively. However, when the soaking solution concentration was increased to 0.2%, GABA content decreased with no significant difference compared to the 42 h water germination, implying that the osmotic pressure of the solution may affect the activity of GABA decarboxylase, thereby influencing the biosynthesis of GABA.
Wu et al. [35] investigated the effect of various CaCl2 concentrations on GABA content after germination in glutinous brown rice. The results revealed that soaking in 2.0% CaCl2 for 24 h increased the GABA content by 1.76 times compared to the control group. However, increasing the concentration led to a decrease in GABA content, indicating that high CaCl2 concentrations may inhibit the activity of glutamate decarboxylase and the metabolism pathway of GABA transaminase [36]. Wu et al. [26] studied the effect of 0.1% and 0.2% soaking solutions (CaCl2 and glutamic acid) on germinated brown rice from the Taichung Sen 10 variety. This variety had undetectable GABA content while ungerminated, although soaking in 0.2% CaCl2 exhibited higher GABA content compared to the results of this experiment, indicating rice variety differences.
Table 3 shows an analysis of the antioxidant components and DPPH radical scavenging capacity of germinated brown rice in various soaking solutions. The total phenolic content of germinated brown rice ranged from 0.85 to 0.93 mg gallic acid equivalent/g, with no significant differences observed following water germination and soaking in various solutions. Similarly, the flavonoid content ranged from 3.68 to 4.41 μg quercetin equivalent/g, with no significant differences found. The DPPH radical scavenging capacity decreased from 87% to 84% after germination but increased to around 90% following soaking in various solutions. Wu et al. [5] found a positive correlation between the antioxidant ability of phenolic compounds and their content during the brown rice germination process.

3.3. Effect of HPP and Ultrasonic Treatment on GABA and Antioxidants of Germinated Brown Rice

Table 4 shows the effect of various soaking solutions combined with HPP or ultrasonic treatment on the GABA content of germinated brown rice. GABA contents in the HPP group reached 83.10 mg/100 g after HPP treatment (100 MPa, holding 10 min) with 0.1% CaCl2 soaking solution. Similarly, when treated with 0.1% Glu soaking solution, the GABA content was 64.29 mg/100 g. However, increasing the soaking solution concentration to 0.2% CaCl2 and Glu, reduced the GABA content to around 62 mg/100 g. Therefore, 0.1% CaCl2 combined with HPP processing was more effective in increasing GABA content. In the ultrasonic group, soaking with 0.1% CaCl2 for 20 min resulted in a higher GABA content of 102.38 mg/100 g. In general, the ultrasonic group obtained higher GABA contents than the HPP group, and these two physical treatments after soaking various solutions enhanced GABA contents in germinated brown rice.
Sun et al. [14] integrated mechanisms of HPP to promote GABA, including (1) changing enzyme conformation; (2) promoting H+ release in plants; (3) disrupting cell structure, accelerating mass transfer between substrate and cells, and promoting enzyme reactions; and (4) altering the structure of Ca2+ channels, promoting calcium ion release [36]. Wu et al. [35] investigated the effect of ultrasonic treatment combined with CaCl2 soaking on brown rice to stimulate brown rice for the first 9 h before germination.
Although 0.2% Glu contained more GABA content, there was no significant difference between them, and CaCl2 is cheaper than that of L-Glu, making CaCl2 a more cost-effective option for increasing GABA content. When comparing the equipment cost and convenient operation of HPP and ultrasonic treatments, ultrasonic treatment was significantly less expensive to operate [37]. Considering production costs, subsequent research recommended 0.1% CaCl2 paired with ultrasonic treatment at a power intensity of 400 W for 20 min for germinated brown rice.
Table 5 shows an analysis of antioxidant activity components and DPPH radical scavenging capacity in germinated brown rice after HPP and ultrasonic treatment. While HPP resulted in a total phenolic content of 0.89–1.00 mg gallic acid equivalent/g, ultrasonic treatment significantly increased the content to 1.06–1.08 mg gallic acid equivalent/g. The flavonoid content remained similar at 3.94–5.15 μg quercetin equivalent/g after both HPP and ultrasonic treatments. The DPPH radical scavenging capacity improved to 93% after ultrasonic treatment, indicating that ultrasonic processing enhances the antioxidant capacity of germinated brown rice.

3.4. Effect of Pretreatments on the Quality of Germinated Brown Rice

To understand whether the quality of germinated brown rice changes under different treatments. Table 6 shows the color appearance of germinated brown rice after soaking, and combined with HPP and ultrasonic treatment. The L* value remained around 55.65 for all treatments, while the a* and b* values showed slight increases after germination. The △E of brown rice and various soaked and germinated brown rice was 1.1~1.98, while the △E of HPP treatment slightly increased to 3.24~4.07, and the △E of ultrasonic treatment increased to 2.18~3.48. However, there were minor variations in color appearance between different pretreatments and ungerminated brown rice.
Because the sensory evaluation of rice requires a large amount of people and time, the taste score values can be used to quickly determine taste quality. The taste analyzer utilizes near-infrared reflectance measurements of key rice ingredients like amylose starch, protein, water, and fatty acids to convert them into a taste value [38]. Table 7 shows the results of the taste evaluation of germinated brown rice using a taste analyzer. The protein content ranged from 5.7 to 7.9, while the amylose content ranged from 18.8% to 17.2%. The fatty acid content varied from 12 to 21 mg/100 mg KOH after various pretreatments. The pretreatment of germinated brown rice affected the composition changes and taste value, the ultrasonic treatment resulted in higher taste values. The group of 0.1% CaCl2 with ultrasonic treatment germinated brown rice has lower protein content and the highest taste value.
Amylose content significantly influences rice quality, with low levels typically associated with higher taste quality [38]. Shi et al. [39] conducted a taste examination of seven different rice varieties to investigate the effect of nitrogen fertilizer usage during rice cultivation on taste scores, and higher taste scores were found to be negatively correlated with protein content.

4. Conclusions

In this study, germinated brown rice was treated with various soaking solutions (0.1% CaCl2, 0.1% Glu, 0.2% CaCl2, and 0.2% Glu). The results showed that higher concentrations (0.2%) of the soaking solutions decreased the GABA content. Subsequently, combination treatments with HPP or ultrasonic treatment were applied. Ultrasonic processing for 20 min resulted in higher GABA contents, reaching 84.85~110.88 mg/100 g, compared to HPP (100 MPa, 10 min), which reached 62.58~83.10 mg/100 g. Additionally, the combination of 0.1% CaCl2 pretreatment followed by ultrasonic treatment significantly increased total polyphenols, flavonoids, and DPPH radical scavenging activity, and enhanced taste value. Considering the equipment cost, ultrasonic treatment is more economical and convenient than HPP, making it a preferable method for enhancing the nutritional quality of germinated brown rice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing, and project administration, resources supervision, writing (review and revision), S.-D.C.; methodology, visualization, H.-Y.H.; analysis and data curation, formal analysis, investigation, software conduct experiments, validation, writing (original draft), S.-F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Agriculture and Food Agency, MOA, Taiwan, R.O.C. project number 111AS-11.1.1-FD-Z2.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data and samples presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Eastern Region Branch, Agriculture and Food Agency, Council of Agriculture, Taiwan for providing a rice taste value analyzer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abhilasha, P.; Pal, U.S.; Panda, M.K.; Sahoo, G.; Nayak, R.; Rayaguru, K.; Sahoo, N.R. Standardisation of cooking and conditioning methods for preparation of quick cooking germinated brown rice. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2021, 98, 100093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, F.; Yang, N.; Touré, A.; Jin, Z.; Xu, X. Germinated brown rice and its role in human health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, H.; Kim, O.-W.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, B.-M.; Oh, J.; Kim, H.-J. Metabolomic analysis of germinated brown rice at different germination stages. Foods 2020, 9, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cho, D.-H.; Lim, S.-T. Germinated brown rice and its bio-functional compounds. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, N.-N.; Li, R.; Li, Z.-J.; Tan, B. Effect of germination in the form of paddy rice and brown rice on their phytic acid, GABA, γ-oryzanol, phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant capacity. Food Res. Int. 2022, 159, 111603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choe, H.; Sung, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y. Effects of calcium chloride treatment on bioactive compound accumulation and antioxidant capacity in germinated brown rice. J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 101, 103294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castanho, A.; Pereira, C.; Lageiro, M.; Oliveira, J.C.; Cunha, L.M.; Brites, C. Improving γ-oryzanol and γ-aminobutyric acid contents in rice beverage amazake produced with brown, milled and germinated rices. Foods 2023, 12, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Huang, T.; Tang, M.; Cheng, B.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, X. iTRAQ-based proteomics reveals key role of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in regulating drought tolerance in perennial creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 145, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, Z.; Lv, J.; Dong, X.; Du, N.; Piao, F. Gamma-aminobutyric acid improves phenanthrene phytotoxicity tolerance in cucumber through the glutathione-dependent system of antioxidant defense. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 217, 112254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, M.; Sun, M.; Gu, Z.; Yang, R. GABA mediates phenolic compounds accumulation and the antioxidant system enhancement in germinated hulless barley under NaCl stress. Food Chem. 2019, 270, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nishimura, M.; Yoshida, S.; Haramoto, M.; Mizuno, H.; Fukuda, T.; Kagami-Katsuyama, H.; Tanaka, A.; Ohkawara, T.; Sato, Y.; Nishihira, J. Effects of white rice containing enriched gamma-aminobutyric acid on blood pressure. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2016, 6, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, L.; Han, X.; Cen, S.; Duan, H.; Feng, S.; Xue, Y.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhai, Q.; et al. Beneficial effect of GABA-rich fermented milk on insomnia involving regulation of gut microbiota. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 233, 126409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Teng, J.; Zhou, W.; Zeng, Z.; Zhao, W.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X. Quality components and antidepressant-like effects of GABA green tea. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 3311–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, Y.; Mehmood, A.; Battino, M.; Xiao, J.; Chen, X. Enrichment of gamma-aminobutyric acid in foods: From conventional methods to innovative technologies. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162, 111801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liao, J.; Wu, X.; Xing, Z.; Li, Q.; Duan, Y.; Fang, W.; Zhu, X. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) accumulation in tea (Camellia sinensis L.) through the GABA shunt and polyamine degradation pathways under anoxia. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3013–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baum, G.; Chen, Y.; Arazi, T.; Takatsuji, H.; Fromm, H. A plant glutamate decarboxylase containing a calmodulin binding domain. Cloning, sequence, and functional analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 19610–19617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Balakrishna, A.K.; Wazed, M.A.; Farid, M. A review on the effect of high pressure processing (HPP) on gelatinization and infusion of nutrients. Molecules 2020, 25, 2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xia, Q.; Wang, L.; Xu, C.; Mei, J.; Li, Y. Effects of germination and high hydrostatic pressure processing on mineral elements, amino acids and antioxidants in vitro bioaccessibility, as well as starch digestibility in brown rice (Oryza sativa L.). Food Chem. 2017, 214, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shigematsu, T.; Hayashi, M.; Nakajima, K.; Uno, Y.; Sakano, A.; Murakami, M.; Narahara, Y.; Ueno, S.; Fujii, T. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on distribution dynamics of free amino acids in water soaked brown rice grain. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 215, 012171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, M.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Jang, G.Y.; Li, M.; Lee, Y.R.; Lee, J.; Jeong, H.S. Influence of applied pressure on bioactive compounds of germinated rough rice (Oryza sativa L.). Food Bioprocess Technol. 2015, 8, 2176–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, M.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Jang, G.Y.; Park, H.J.; Li, M.; Kim, S.; Lee, Y.R.; Noh, Y.H.; Lee, J.; Jeong, H.S. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on the enhancement of functional components of germinated rough rice (Oryza sativa L.). Food Chem. 2015, 166, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chemat, F.; Khan, M.K. Applications of ultrasound in food technology: Processing, preservation and extraction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 813–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feng, H.; Barbosa-Canovas, G.; Weiss, J. (Eds.) Ultrasound Technologies for Food and Bioprocessing; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, H.; Gao, J.; Yang, A.; Chen, H. The ultrasound-treated soybean seeds improve edibility and nutritional quality of soybean sprouts. Food Res. Int. 2015, 77, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ding, J.; Ulanov, A.V.; Dong, M.; Yang, T.; Nemzer, B.V.; Xiong, S.; Zhao, S.; Feng, H. Enhancement of gama-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and other health-related metabolites in germinated red rice (Oryza sativa L.) by ultrasonication. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 40, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, N.-T.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Chen, S.-D. Quality of germinated brown rice by pretreatment of soaking solution and high pressure processing (HPP). Taiwan J. Agric. Chem. Food Sci. 2024, 62, accepted. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hung, C.-H.; Chen, S.-D. Study of inducing factors on resveratrol and antioxidant content in germinated peanuts. Molecules 2022, 27, 5700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 10th ed.; Method 44-15.02. Moisture-air oven methods. Approved November 3, 1999; Cereals & Grains Association: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1999. [CrossRef]
  29. Le, P.H.; Verscheure, L.; Le, T.T.; Verheust, Y.; Raes, K. Implementation of HPLC analysis for γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in fermented Food Matrices. Food Anal. Method 2020, 13, 1190–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, J.-Y.; Tang, C.-Y. Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents in selected fruits and vegetables, as well as their stimulatory effects on mouse splenocyte proliferation. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, Y.-T.; Pao, C.-C.; Wu, S.-T.; Chang, C.-Y. Effect of different germination conditions on antioxidative properties and bioactive compounds of germinated brown rice. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 608761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yen, Y.-F.; Lin, J.-D.; Chen, S.-D. Study of processing and application of germinated brown rice. Taiwan. J. Agric. Chem. Food Sci. 2016, 54, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. CXS 198-1995; Standard for Rice. FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius: Rome, Italy, 1995. Available online: https://www.fao.org (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  34. Oh, S.H.; Choi, W.G. Changes in the levels of [gamma]-aminobutyric acid and glutamate decarboxylase in developing soybean seedlings. J. Plant Res. 2001, 114, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, Y.; He, S.; Pan, T.; Miao, X.; Xiang, J.; Ye, Y.; Cao, X.; Sun, H. Enhancement of γ-aminobutyric acid and relevant metabolites in brown glutinous rice (Oryza sativa L.) through salt stress and low-frequency ultrasound treatments at pre-germination stage. Food Chem. 2023, 410, 135362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Poojary, M.M.; Dellarosa, N.; Roohinejad, S.; Koubaa, M.; Tylewicz, U.; Gómez-Galindo, F.; Saraiva, J.A.; Rosa, M.D.; Barba, F.J. Influence of innovative processing on γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) contents in plant food materials. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gomes, W.F.; Tiwari, B.K.; Rodriguez, Ó.; de Brito, E.S.; Fernandes, F.A.N.; Rodrigues, S. Effect of ultrasound followed by high pressure processing on prebiotic cranberry juice. Food Chem. 2017, 218, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, H.; Chen, D.; He, L.; Wang, T.; Lu, H.; Yang, F.; Deng, F.; Chen, Y.; Tao, Y.; Li, M.; et al. Correlation of taste values with chemical compositions and Rapid Visco Analyser profiles of 36 indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Food Chem. 2021, 349, 129176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shi, S.; Wang, E.; Li, C.; Cai, M.; Cheng, B.; Cao, C.; Jiang, Y. Use of protein content, amylose content, and RVA parameters to evaluate the taste quality of rice. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 758547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The water absorption curve of brown rice during soaking at room temperature. Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 1. The water absorption curve of brown rice during soaking at room temperature. Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 3).
Applsci 14 05771 g001
Figure 2. Pictures of germinated brown rice at different germination times: (A) 0 h, (B) 12 h, (C) 24 h, (D) 30 h, (E) 36 h, (F) 42 h, and (G) 48 h.
Figure 2. Pictures of germinated brown rice at different germination times: (A) 0 h, (B) 12 h, (C) 24 h, (D) 30 h, (E) 36 h, (F) 42 h, and (G) 48 h.
Applsci 14 05771 g002
Figure 3. Drying and temperature curves of 1 kg germinated brown rice during 35 °C cold air drying. Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 3. Drying and temperature curves of 1 kg germinated brown rice during 35 °C cold air drying. Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 3).
Applsci 14 05771 g003
Table 1. HPLC mobile phase gradient of GABA.
Table 1. HPLC mobile phase gradient of GABA.
Time (min)Phase A (%)Phase B (%)Flow Rate (mL/min)
09281.0
2060401.0
289281.0
Table 2. Effects of various soaking solutions on GABA content of germinated brown rice.
Table 2. Effects of various soaking solutions on GABA content of germinated brown rice.
Germination TreatmentGABA (mg/100 g)
Ungermination7.10 ± 2.53 c
Water 22.33 ± 7.87 b
Soaking
0.1% CaCl242.51 ± 11.37 a
0.1% Glu44.64 ± 2.95 a
0.2% CaCl230.09 ± 9.51 b
0.2% Glu27.40 ± 7.89 b
Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 3). Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Analyses of antioxidant active components and DPPH free radical scavenging ability in germinated brown rice by various soaking solutions.
Table 3. Analyses of antioxidant active components and DPPH free radical scavenging ability in germinated brown rice by various soaking solutions.
Germination
Treatment
Total Polyphenols (mg Gallic Acid
Equivalent/g)
Flavonoids
(µg Quercetin
Equivalent/g)
Scavenging DPPH Free Radicals (%)
Ungermination0.91 ± 0.01 ab3.68 ± 0.00 a87.01 ± 0.11 d
Water 0.84 ± 0.01 b4.41 ± 0.00 a84.61 ± 2.61 e
Soaking
0.1% CaCl20.90 ± 0.03 ab4.17 ± 0.42 a89.98 ± 0.24 abc
0.1% Glu0.85 ± 0.02 b3.68 ± 0.00 a89.39 ± 0.17 bc
0.2% CaCl20.90 ± 0.07 ab4.17 ± 0.85 a88.94 ± 1.83 c
0.2% Glu0.93 ± 0.01 a3.68 ± 0.00 a88.69 ± 0.25 cd
Vitamin C91.72 ± 0.00 a
BHA91.06 ± 0.00 ab
Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 3). Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05). The concentrations of the sample, vitamin C, and BHA for the DPPH assay were 20 mg/mL.
Table 4. Effects of various soaking solutions with HPP or ultrasonic treatments on GABA content of germinated brown rice.
Table 4. Effects of various soaking solutions with HPP or ultrasonic treatments on GABA content of germinated brown rice.
Germination TreatmentGABA (mg/100 g)
Ungermination7.10 ± 2.53 f
Water 22.33 ± 7.87 e
Soaking/HPP (100 MPa, 10 min)
Water67.17 ± 3.99 d
0.1% CaCl283.10 ±1.65 c
0.1% Glu64.29 ± 2.38 d
0.2% CaCl262.58 ± 3.34 d
0.2% Glu62.62 ± 7.91 d
Soaking/ultrasonic treatment (400 W, 20 min)
Water84.85 ± 1.45 c
0.1% CaCl2102.38 ± 6.53 ab
0.1% Glu96.73 ± 11.28 b
0.2% CaCl281.24 ± 5.48 c
0.2% Glu110.88 ± 6.02 a
Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 3). Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effects of HPP and ultrasonic treatment on the content of antioxidants in germinated brown rice.
Table 5. Effects of HPP and ultrasonic treatment on the content of antioxidants in germinated brown rice.
Germination
Treatment
Total Polyphenols
(mg Gallic Acid
Equivalent/g)
Flavonoids
(µg Quercetin
Equivalent/g)
Scavenging DPPH Free Radicals (%)
Ungermination0.91 ± 0.01 c3.68 ± 0.00 c87.01 ± 0.11 d
Water 0.84 ± 0.01 d4.41 ± 0.00 abc84.61 ± 2.61 e
Soaking/HPP (100 MPa, 10 min)
Water0.90 ± 0.02 c3.92 ± 0.42 c86.62 ± 1.23 d
0.1% CaCl20.94 ± 0.01 c5.15 ± 1.27 a89.58 ± 0.71 c
0.1% Glu0.89 ± 0.04 c3.68 ± 0.00 c86.83 ± 1.48 d
0.2% CaCl20.93 ± 0.02 c3.92 ± 0.74 c89.14 ± 0.05 c
0.2% Glu1.00 ± 0.06 b4.90 ± 0.42 ab86.33 ± 0.44 d
Soaking/ultrasonic treatment (400 W, 20 min)
Water1.06 ± 0.02 a3.92 ± 0.42 c92.50 ± 0.51 ab
0.1% CaCl21.06 ± 0.01 a3.94 ± 0.00 c93.10 ± 0.10 ab
0.1% Glu1.08 ± 0.03 a3.92 ± 0.42 c93.21 ± 0.09 a
0.2% CaCl21.08 ± 0.02 a4.15 ± 0.46 bc93.08 ± 0.08 a
0.2% Glu1.06 ± 0.01 a4.41 ± 0.00 abc93.00 ± 0.21 a
Vitamin C91.72 ± 0.00 ab
BHA91.06 ± 0.00 b
Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 3). Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05). The concentrations of the sample, vitamin C, and BHA for the DPPH assay were 20 mg/mL.
Table 6. Color of germinated brown rice by different pretreatments.
Table 6. Color of germinated brown rice by different pretreatments.
Germination TreatmentL*a*b*△E
Ungermination55.33 ± 1.34 bcd2.19 ± 0.21 d16.92 ± 1.15 d0
Water55.65 ± 0.13 bcd2.58 ± 0.45 cd18.83 ± 2.15 bc1.98
Soaking
0.1% CaCl256.16 ± 0.73 bcd3.01 ± 0.32 abcd17.62 ± 1.22 cd1.36
0.1% Glu54.55 ± 1.97 cd2.93 ± 0.34 abcd16.65 ± 0.42 d1.11
0.2% CaCl254.62 ± 1.16 cd2.86 ± 0.45 bcd17.35 ± 0.67 cd1.07
0.2% Glu54.21 ± 0.79 d3.22 ± 0.32 abc17.34 ± 0.52 cd1.58
Soaking/HPP (100 MPa, 10 min)
Water56.77 ± 1.21 abc3.69 ± 1.22 ab18.20 ± 1.22 bcd2.44
0.1% CaCl258.92 ± 1.70 a2.47 ± 0.33 cd17.72 ± 1.26 cd3.69
0.1% Glu56.18 ± 0.94 bcd3.91 ± 0.30 a19.53 ± 0.56 ab3.24
0.2% CaCl255.88 ± 1.04 bcd3.70 ± 0.66 ab20.66 ± 0.77 a4.07
0.2% Glu57.12 ± 0.79 ab3.71 ± 0.79 ab19.79 ± 0.63 ab3.71
Soaking/ultrasonic treatment (400 W, 20 min)
Water55.81 ± 1.43 bcd3.12 ± 0.58 abcd17.67 ± 0.24 cd1.29
0.1% CaCl256.12 ± 1.45 bcd3.06 ± 0.55 abcd19.00 ± 0.37 abc2.39
0.1% Glu55.92 ± 0.16 bcd3.22 ± 0.48 abc18.85 ± 0.66 bc2.27
0.2% CaCl257.31 ± 2.17 ab3.21 ± 0.17 abc19.59 ± 1.06 ab3.48
0.2% Glu55.96 ± 0.76 bcd2.60 ± 0.05 cd18.97 ± 0.12 abc2.18
Data were expressed as mean and error bars of ± S.D. (n = 6). Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 7. Analysis of the taste profile of germinated brown rice under different soaking treatments.
Table 7. Analysis of the taste profile of germinated brown rice under different soaking treatments.
Germination
Treatment
Moisture
(%)
Protein
(%)
Amylose
(%)
Fatty Acid
(mg/100 mg KOH)
Taste Value
Ungermination14.56.918.81978
Water14.87.918.21470
0.1% CaCl214.97.818.81669
0.1% CaCl2 + HPP14.57.818.31271
0.1% CaCl2 + US13.25.717.22187
Data were expressed as mean (n = 3).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsou, S.-F.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Chen, S.-D. Effects of Different Pretreatments on the GABA Content of Germinated Brown Rice. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135771

AMA Style

Tsou S-F, Hsu H-Y, Chen S-D. Effects of Different Pretreatments on the GABA Content of Germinated Brown Rice. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(13):5771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135771

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsou, Shao-Fu, Hsin-Yun Hsu, and Su-Der Chen. 2024. "Effects of Different Pretreatments on the GABA Content of Germinated Brown Rice" Applied Sciences 14, no. 13: 5771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135771

APA Style

Tsou, S. -F., Hsu, H. -Y., & Chen, S. -D. (2024). Effects of Different Pretreatments on the GABA Content of Germinated Brown Rice. Applied Sciences, 14(13), 5771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135771

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop