3.1. Design of the Single-Mode Waveguide
Optical waveguides are designed using slot waveguides based on a silicon-gallium nitride (Si-GaN) structure. Gallium nitride (GaN) has been widely used for integrating optically active nanodevices and non-photonic devices due to its superior electrical properties, temperature resistance, and potential to cover a broad-spectrum range [
13]. GaN components can be grown on epitaxial substrates or directly on silicon substrates. It is recommended to use materials with the smallest refractive index difference to incorporate slot waveguides into the construction of multimode interference devices.
Recent research has highlighted the superiority of GaN compared to materials such as silicon-alumina and silicon-silica (SiO2) for this application [
13]. By utilizing GaN as the material for slot waveguides, the performance of the devices is significantly enhanced. GaN’s high refractive index contrast and its compatibility with silicon technology make it an excellent choice for high-performance integrated optical devices. The use of GaN in slot waveguides not only improves the optical confinement but also enhances the overall efficiency and functionality of the photonic devices. In the fabrication of silicon gallium nitride (Si-GaN) structure, it needs to be prepared through various processes such as photolithography and etching. In the preparation of silicon-based slot waveguides, 0.2 μm is easier to achieve single-mode propagation than 0.22 μm, which helps to reduce mode interference and optical loss, and it has stronger mode constraints, which makes it more suitable for high-density integrated photonic devices. In this paper, we use a mode solution to simulate the design of the device in the 1550 nm optical wavelength range.
Figure 1a depicts a three-layered slot waveguide comprising two Si layers with a refractive index of 3.47 and a GaN layer that has a refractive index of 2.305. This waveguide is encircled by a SiO
2 cladding layer, which has a refractive index of 1.45.
HSi and
HGaN are the heights of Si and GaN, respectively.
W is the width of the slot waveguide, which operates at a wavelength of 1550 nm.
Figure 1b shows an example of the structure of the power splitter, which comprises three components, i.e., the input waveguide, the multimode interference coupling region, and the output waveguide.
LMMI is the length of the coupling region.
W0 is the width of the narrow end of the coupling region, whereas
W1 is the width of the broad end of the coupling region.
LTaper and
WTaper are the length and width of the taper structures, respectively. All the waveguides, including the input and output ones, use a slot-waveguide configuration. The multimode interference coupling region is designed to achieve efficient power splitting.
Stable transmission of optical signals was achieved through a waveguide under single-mode transmission conditions by using an effective refractive index method to determine the optimal height and width of the slot waveguide. Waveguide configurations with varying heights for silicon and gallium nitride as well as different widths for the slot waveguide were scanned.
The single-mode conditions are analyzed for the Si waveguide height, and the variation of the mode refractive index with the waveguide height is analyzed in the range of 0.16–0.26 μm for the Si waveguide height. From
Figure 2a, it can be observed that the criteria for achieving single-mode transmission are fulfilled only when the height of Si is less than and not equal to 0.24 μm. It is noteworthy that the standardized preparation process usually assumes the height of Si to be around 0.2 or 0.22 μm. Therefore, in our study, the height of silicon was set to 0.2 μm to align with the standardized preparation process. In
Figure 2b, single-mode conditions are analyzed for the GaN waveguide, and the mode refractive index of the silicon nitride waveguide height is analyzed in the range of 0–0.25 μm as a function of the waveguide height, and the height of GaN is determined to be 0.1 μm; the single-mode transmission condition is satisfied without excessively increasing the height of the waveguide, which is beneficial for the preparation process. After determining the silicon waveguide height as well as the gallium nitride waveguide height, the overall input waveguide width is analyzed for single-mode conditions. As depicted in
Figure 2c, single-mode transmission is achieved when the waveguide width is less than and not equal to 0.45 μm. Therefore, the width of the waveguide was chosen to be 0.4 μm in the design.
The mode distribution characteristics of a single-mode waveguide are shown in
Figure 3. From
Figure 3a,b, it is evident that the TE-mode optical field is distributed within the silicon layer, while the TM-mode optical field is distributed within the gallium nitride layer. In particular, the discontinuity on the horizontal dividing plane is the primary trait of the TM mode, which is concentrated mainly within the low refractive index domain. Conversely, the optical field distribution of the TE mode mainly resides within the high refractive index range, closely resembling that of a typical silicon-based waveguide configuration [
18]. Consequently, the TE mode was chosen for the subsequent analysis.
3.2. Optimization of the Multimode Interference Region
In this study, a uniform coupling region with a width of 3 μm was designed. As stated in Equation (2), the beat length is in direct proportion to the width of the coupling region. As a result, decreasing the width of the coupler would result in a shortened length of the coupling region. This is beneficial for creating more compact optical devices. However, there is a trade-off, i.e., excessively reducing the width may lead to unintended coupling between the modes of the output ports. This phenomenon occurs because, as the width narrows, the spatial separation between modes decreases, increasing the likelihood of crosstalk and mode interference. To mitigate this issue, the coupling region is designed in a parabolic shape. The parabolic design helps to gradually taper the width, allowing for a smoother transition and better control over the coupling dynamics. The width change function of the coupling region is formulated to optimize performance while maintaining a balance between reducing the coupling region’s length and avoiding unintended mode coupling. The width change function of the coupling region is formulated according to the following equation [
22]:
where x and y are the range of values for the length and width of the coupling region, respectively.
W0 is the width of the coupling region at x = 0, whereas
W1 is the width of the coupling region at x =
LMMI. In order to determine the optimal imaging length and width of the coupling zone, this study used the EME function module of the Mode Solutions software (v.2020 r2) for simulation and analysis. The width of the narrow end of the coupling zone,
W0, was first determined, and then the value of
W0 was systematically varied to assess its effect on the normalized transmission as well as the value of
LMMI. Through such simulations, the authors of this study were able to better understand the impact of width and length variations on coupling efficiency and transmission quality and, thus, optimize the design parameters to achieve optimal performance.
Figure 4 presents the curves showing the variation in normalized transmission with
LMMI for different values of
W0.
From
Figure 4, it can be clearly seen that when the value of
W0 increases from 2.2 to 2.6 μm, the normalized transmission shows an increasing and then decreasing trend with the change of
LMMI. The normalized transmission is maximum when
W0 is 2.4 μm. When
W0 is 2.4 μm, the results are shown in
Figure 4 when the
LMMI increases from 2.5 to 6 μm. It can be seen that the total normalized transmission is highest at 0.992 when the length of the coupling region is kept at 4 μm. Thus, in the subsequent analysis, the length of the coupling region was chosen as 4 μm, and the width of the coupling region was chosen as 2.4 μm.
Figure 5 shows the optical field distribution of a 1 × 3 power splitter based on multimode interference in a parabolic Si-GaN slot-waveguide structure. The input light at the output port is evenly divided into 3 parts at the output port.
3.3. Optimization of the Taper
The tapered structure in a waveguide system is a key factor in optimizing performance. The tapered structure is a transition region that smooths the mode shift between the single-mode input waveguide and the multimode interference region. This transition is critical because abrupt changes in waveguide dimensions can cause scattering and coupling inefficiencies, leading to higher excess losses and imbalances. Therefore, a tapered structure was introduced in the connecting portion of the input/output waveguide and the multimode interference coupling region. This design feature effectively mitigates the excess loss problem while improving the device imbalance. In addition, the taper improves the coupling efficiency from the single-mode input to the coupling region, further improving the fabrication tolerance of the power divider [
21]. According to
Figure 6a, there is a clear trend of excess loss and imbalance when the taper length is varied in the range of 1.9 to 2.1 μm. It can be concluded that the best performance is achieved when the taper length is 2 μm. Therefore, the taper length was set to 2 μm. The width of the tapered surface was scanned to assess any associated excess loss or imbalance.
It is evident from
Figure 6b that within the 0.5 to 0.7 μm range for the width of the taper, there is a notable decrease and subsequent increase in both the excess loss and imbalance. This trend reveals the sensitivity of the device performance to the width of the cone. For smaller taper widths, specifically closer to 0.5 μm, the excess loss and imbalance decrease. This reduction can be attributed to the decrease in waveguide crosstalk. Crosstalk occurs when there is interference between the signals in adjacent waveguides, leading to signal degradation. A narrower taper width reduces the overlap between the modes of adjacent waveguides, thereby minimizing crosstalk and improving performance. However, as the taper width increases beyond a certain threshold, particularly above 0.65 μm, the crosstalk between the output waveguides becomes more pronounced. This increased crosstalk results in a deterioration in the performance of the power splitter, manifesting as higher excess loss and imbalance. Therefore, it is crucial to choose an appropriate value of taper width that balances the reduction in excess loss and imbalance against the increase in crosstalk. Through simulation analysis, it was found that a taper width of 0.65 μm provides the optimal trade-off between these factors. At this width, the device achieves a minimum imbalance and an excess loss of less than 0.036 dB. This balance ensures that the device performs efficiently without significant signal degradation. Thus, based on these findings, the taper width for the device was set to 0.65 μm. This value was chosen to optimize the performance of the power splitter, ensuring low excess loss and minimal imbalance while avoiding the adverse effects of increased crosstalk.
3.4. Analysis of Preparation Tolerance
During the production of optical waveguide devices, variations in the length and width of the coupling region can arise due to both the fabrication process and material characteristics. These discrepancies are often unavoidable because they stem from the inherent limitations and fluctuations in manufacturing technologies and the physical properties of the materials used. These deviations can have significant adverse effects on the performance of the device. Therefore, designing devices with good preparation tolerance is essential. Preparation tolerance refers to a device’s ability to maintain high performance despite variations in its fabrication. Devices with significant tolerance margins can accommodate these variations without substantial decline in performance. This not only ensures consistent device operation but also leads to reduced manufacturing costs, as it minimizes the need for highly precise and expensive fabrication processes. Additionally, it minimizes performance fluctuations, thereby enhancing the reliability of the optical systems in which these devices are used [
21]. In this study, we aim to analyze the device tolerance passes under the condition of constant coupling zone width. This approach allows us to systematically study how length variations affect the excess loss and imbalance of the device. This analysis helps to determine the optimal dimensions that provide the best performance while maintaining a high tolerance to fabrication variations.
As depicted in
Figure 7, when
W0 is kept constant and
LMMI increased from 3.5 to 4.5 μm, the excess loss and imbalance are less than 1 dB. These results demonstrate that the device is highly tolerant to variations in
LMMI. To further investigate the resulting values of excess loss and imbalance, while keeping the length of the coupling region constant, the width of the coupling region was modified.
As depicted in
Figure 8, when
LMMI is kept constant and
W0 increased from 2 to 2.8 μm, the excess loss and imbalance exhibited a strong variation. This can be attributed to the fact that the
LMMI is proportional to the square of
W0. Thus, even a slight variation in
W0 causes a more significant change in both excess loss and imbalance compared to that caused by variation in length. To maintain low levels of excess loss and imbalance, the width deviation of the coupling region should be kept within the range of ±0.2 µm.