Next Article in Journal
Construction Technology and Service Performance of Waterproof Curtain for Foundation Pit in Large-Particle Pebble Gravel Layer of Yangtze River Floodplain
Previous Article in Journal
DTAG: A Methodology for Aggregating Digital Twins Using WoTDT Ontology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Chewing Bite Wafers versus Conventional Analgesic Drugs to Relieve Self-Reported Pain Associated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Luay Jabr
1,
Maryam Altuhafy
2,
Abdul Basir Barmak
3,
Paul Emile Rossouw
1 and
Dimitrios Michelogiannakis
1,*
1
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, New York, NY 14620, USA
2
Department of Orofacial Pain and TMD, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, New York, NY 14620, USA
3
Department of Dentistry, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, New York, NY 14620, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(13), 5963; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135963
Submission received: 19 March 2024 / Revised: 21 June 2024 / Accepted: 25 June 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orthodontic Treatment: Current State and Future Possibilities)

Abstract

(1) Objectives: To estimate the impact of chewing bite wafers in reducing pain associated with fixed orthodontic treatment (OT) compared with conventional analgesic drugs (CADs) (Ibuprofen or Acetaminophen). (2) Materials and methods: Unrestricted and manual searching was achieved up to November 2023 and PRISMA guidelines were followed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. The available evidence quality was considered using the GRADE approach. (3) Results: Seven RCTs were included. Five RCTs used the Visual Analog Scale for self-reported pain assessment, while two RCTs used the Numeric Rating Scale. Four RCTs had a high RoB, and three RCTs had a moderate RoB. Separate meta-analyses were performed by pooling quantitative data from two RCTs that compared self-reported orthodontic pain between the bite wafer and Ibuprofen groups and three RCTs that compared the bite wafer and Acetaminophen groups for the different timepoints after orthodontic treatment. None of the timepoints individually indicated a significant difference in pain scores between the bite wafer and control groups, except on day 3, indicating significantly lower pain scores in the bite wafer versus the Acetaminophen groups. The overall level of evidence was very low. (4) Conclusions: Chewing bite wafers is possibly a useful option for CADs to relieve pain during early fixed OT.
Keywords: bite wafer; ibuprofen; orthodontic treatment; pain; paracetamol bite wafer; ibuprofen; orthodontic treatment; pain; paracetamol

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jabr, L.; Altuhafy, M.; Barmak, A.B.; Rossouw, P.E.; Michelogiannakis, D. Chewing Bite Wafers versus Conventional Analgesic Drugs to Relieve Self-Reported Pain Associated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135963

AMA Style

Jabr L, Altuhafy M, Barmak AB, Rossouw PE, Michelogiannakis D. Chewing Bite Wafers versus Conventional Analgesic Drugs to Relieve Self-Reported Pain Associated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(13):5963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135963

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jabr, Luay, Maryam Altuhafy, Abdul Basir Barmak, Paul Emile Rossouw, and Dimitrios Michelogiannakis. 2024. "Chewing Bite Wafers versus Conventional Analgesic Drugs to Relieve Self-Reported Pain Associated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Applied Sciences 14, no. 13: 5963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135963

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop