Next Article in Journal
Exploring Digital Technologies for Addressing Risk Factors of Solitary Death in South Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Status-Byte-Assisted RDMA Transmission Mechanism for Optimizing Multi-Task Video Streaming in Edge Computing
Previous Article in Special Issue
AtomGID: An Atomic Gesture Identifier for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Generative Adversarial Networks in Business and Social Science

by
Africa Ruiz-Gándara
and
Luis Gonzalez-Abril
*
Department Applied Economic I, Faculty of Sciences of Economics and Business, University of Seville, Avda. Ramón y Cajal, 1, E-41018 Sevilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(17), 7438; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177438 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 24 July 2024 / Revised: 16 August 2024 / Accepted: 20 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024

Abstract

:

Featured Application

The importance of generative adversarial networks (GANs) in economics is growing and is driven by successes in other fields. Many economic problems could benefit from GANs, although few studies exist and progress is needed. This paper argues for the use of GANs as a novel and effective tool in economics. An important issue is the need for large datasets, where traditional techniques fall short due to a multiplicity of problems, making the use of GANs very useful in this task.

Abstract

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have become a recent and rapidly developing research topic in machine learning. Since their inception in 2014, a significant number of variants have been proposed to address various topics across many fields, and they have particularly excelled not only in image and language processing but also in the medical and data science domains. In this paper, we aim to highlight the significance of and advancements that these GAN models can introduce in the field of Business Economics, where they have yet to be fully developed. To this end, a review of the literature of GANs is presented in general together with a more specific review in the field of Business Economics, for which only a few papers can be found. Furthermore, the most relevant papers are analysed in order to provide approaches for the opportunity to research GANs in the field of Business Economics.

1. Introduction

Currently, we are facing a continuous technological advance that necessitates significant societal changes. In light of this new social structure, massive data holds particular interest, since access to this resource signifies major privileges. Traders, manufacturers, suppliers, insurers, and entrepreneurs all require access to and the ability to utilise extensive databases that enable them to study and uncover the necessary information to establish commercial strategies. This access also allows them to understand customer profiles and preferences, thereby enabling informed decision-making on pricing, promotions, risk assessment, competition, business models, and more. However, these highly coveted volumes of data have surpassed human capacity for collection, storage, and analysis. Consequently, to undertake these tasks effectively, humans require suitable tools, such as statistics intelligence and machine learning.
Major advances are being made in machine learning, which has been utilised to recognise patterns and identify objects. However, recently there has been a leap towards generating entirely new objects and individuals. Generative models are capable of creating all kinds of content from images and text. Among them, we highlight: generative adversarial networks (GANs), transformers, variational autoencoders (VAEs), diffusion models, and neural radiance fields (NeRFs). It is worth noting that when choosing one model or another, one should consider choosing a model that works well for the problem to be tackled. Thus, for example, one would use transformers for translation tasks, NeRFs for 3D scenes, and GANs for the generation of synthetic datasets. It is important that a sufficient quantity and quality of data be available; thus, for example, transformers need a large volume of data, but GANs work better with less data. Another aspect to consider is the quality of the results: GANs are better at obtaining clear and detailed images, while VAE obtains more uniform results.
This paper is focused on GANs. Thus, by using two antagonistic neural networks, ref. [1] proposes a tool called “Generative Adversarial Networks” (GANs), which are capable of creating faces of people that are not real, and it is difficult to differentiate these from real faces. While this is one of the most popular applications of GANs, their true importance lies in their capability to generate synthetic data that appear indistinguishable from real data.
In this paper, a bibliographic review of GANs is conducted that focuses on contributions made in the areas of Business and Social Science. Presently, within the literature, various reviews on GANs in general can be found [2,3,4,5,6,7]. However, none of these specifically concentrates on the potential applications within the field of Business Economics. The objective is to showcase the potential of this tool within these two areas.
The rest of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 briefly defines a GAN and how it functions. Section 3 presents a statistical study of publications on GANs gathered from the Web of Science. In Section 4, the focus is placed on GAN publications within the scope of this work: Business Economics. Section 5 details the relevance of this tool in the field of Business Economics. Section 6 outlines the conclusions drawn.

2. Generative Adversarial Networks

The main aim of GANs is the automatic generation of data. Its main difference from other generative models is that it does not directly use the distribution of real data; instead, it operates through a classifier. The generative model is random and adjusts itself step-by-step based on the classifier’s response, continually refining the output until the discriminator is unable to differentiate between real and synthetic data.
In order to achieve this objective, two neural networks—namely, the generator and the discriminator—are employed, which engage in a competitive process. The generator produces synthetic data resembling real data, while the discriminator endeavours to distinguish between real data and the data supplied by the generator.
This competition between the generator and discriminator can be viewed through game theory as a zero-sum game since the two networks have conflicting objectives; as one network improves, the other deteriorates. Consequently, the minimax algorithm can be employed, which is a decision-making algorithm that minimises the maximum loss in the game [8]. Thus, the training objective of GANs is to find the Nash equilibrium. Ref. [1] demonstrated that the Nash equilibrium is reached when the generator produces samples indistinguishable from the training dataset and the discriminator can only randomly guess whether a sample is real or fake, which means the generated samples are indistinguishable to the discriminator. When the Nash equilibrium is achieved, it is said that the network converges. In practice, GAN training is conducted using techniques that are not explicitly designed to find the Nash equilibrium, which may potentially lead to non-convergence [9]. At times, achieving convergence might necessitate the imposition of stringent conditions, which can be challenging to meet in practice [10,11,12].
The goal of the generator is to fool the discriminator, and the goal of the discriminator is to not be fooled. This confrontation leads to the generator being increasingly capable of providing synthetic data that is more similar to real data. The ideal solution in the GAN model is that the percentage of success of the discriminator for the real data and synthetic data is 50 % for both cases. The structure of a GAN model for a database can be observed in Figure 1.

2.1. Mathematical Framework

Let us give a technical introduction of the GAN model: Given a database with m real samples ( x ) (training data) and a random noise vector ( z ), the following terms are considered:
  • G ( z ) is the output of the generator from the noise z : that is, it is the synthetic data.
  • D ( x ) is the output of the discriminator when a real sample x is processed.
  • D ( G ( z ) ) is the prediction of the discriminator on the synthetic data.
  • P x and P z are the distributions of real and noise data, respectively.
  • E x and E G ( z ) are the expected log likelihoods from the different outputs of real and generated data, respectively.
  • θ D and θ G are the weights of the discriminator and generator model, respectively.
The expression to be considered for the complete network comprising the discriminator and generator is denoted by V and is as follows:
V ( θ D , θ G ) = E x P x [ log D ( x ) ] + E z P z [ log ( 1 D ( G ( z ) ) ) ] .
This value function is submitted to a min–max strategy with the goal of maximising the discriminator loss and minimising the generator loss:
min θ G max θ D V ( θ D , θ G ) .
Furthermore, a suitable setup for each artificial neural network employed and its training is required for the implementation of a GAN.

2.2. Variants of GANs

The training of GANs presents some major challenges: for example, mode collapse [14], non-convergence [11,15,16], and instability [17], among others [18,19]. Furthermore, a GAN can be structured to address a specific problem. Thus, some variants of GANs have been proposed in order to overcome these challenges by redesigning the generator and discriminator in the network architecture, changing the form of loss functions, and altering optimization algorithms. Hence, the following variants of GANs are worthy of note:
  • Conditional GAN (CGAN): This is similar to the classic GAN but allows for the generation of data from a specific class defined within the real dataset, such as the generation of MNIST digits conditioned on class labels [20].
  • Vanilla GAN: This is a simple type of GAN where the discriminator and the generator are simpler, multilayer perceptrons [1].
  • Deeper convolutional GAN (DCGAN): This is a GAN whereby the architecture of both the generator and discriminator is composed of ConvNets instead of multilayer perceptrons [21,22,23].
  • Laplacian pyramid GAN (LAPGAN): This combines the CGAN model with a Laplacian pyramid representation [24].
Other known networks include: SRGAN, which employs a deep neural network [25]; StackGAN [26,27]; CycleGAN, as proposed in [28]; PassGAN [29]; WGAN, as seen in [30]; spatio–temporal GAN, as studied in [31]; constrained GAN, which can be seen in [32]; H-GAN [33]; pix2pix, as proposed in [34]; Android-GAN [35]; UNIT, which was developed in [36]; RGAN and RaGAN, as introduced in [37]; and AnoGAN, as proposed in [38]. Ref. [39] introduces GANomaly and RCGAN, which are showcased in [40], and EGAN [41] and TimeGAN are seen in [42], among others.
Another approach to addressing the limitations of GANs is through the proposal of hybrid models that combine GANs with other deep learning models such as transformers [43,44,45], diffusion models [46,47,48], and large language models [49,50]. This line of research on the hybridisation of GANs with other architectures represents a promising field of investigation.
Despite the continuous advancements and rapid growth that GANs have experienced since their inception, several challenges remain to be addressed. These include the consistency, the convergence rate, improving training stability and diversity, enhancing resources and real-time scalability, and the need to establish robust ethical regulations.

2.3. Applications of GANs

GANs have been employed to address various types of problems:
  • Generating synthetic data for training: In [13,51], GANs are employed to generate data related to lung cancer patients, and statistical tests are employed to validate such synthetic data. For the generation of time-series data, one can employ SeqGAN [52]. It is also possible to generate synthetic data in tabular datasets using CTGAN [53].
  • Generating text and natural language: There are several notable examples: SeqGAN [52], which generates text sequences; LeakGAN [54], which introduces a search policy to enhance text generation; and RankGAN [55]. Others, like textGAN [56], are used for natural language generation. CTRL, proposed by [57], facilitates controlled text generation and enables users to specify style and content. Additionally, GPT-3, one of the most influential studies in text generation using GAN, is based on a transformer architecture that produces high-level, coherent, and natural text [58].
  • Generating realistic images: One of the initial applications of GANs for generating realistic images was introduced by [21], where the authors proposed a DCGAN. Subsequently, other authors suggested different GAN modalities for distinct objectives. For instance, [28] applied CycleGAN to generate images by learning domain correspondence without the need for labelled data pairs. Another example is given by [26], which used StackGAN to produce detailed, high-resolution images by introducing a cascaded generator architecture. Other GAN variants, such as those employed for generating human faces [59], include StyleGAN [60,61,62] and BigGAN [63]. These models are utilised to enhance the quality and resolution of generated images and employ a scalable architecture. Other DCGAN variants are employed for the generation of human poses from a photograph [64] and can even project the age progression of an individual [65].
  • Enhancement and restoration of damaged or low-quality images: To address this issue, several alternatives to the classic GAN have been proposed, such as SRGAN [25], Pix2Pix [34], and CycleGAN [28]. The latter addresses inpainting tasks (by filling in missing or damaged regions of an image) using DeepFill [66,67]. To restore images that are corrupted by noise, RedNet was designed [68], and for noise filtering, nCNN and FFDNet were created [69,70].
  • Speech synthesis: This constitutes one of the earliest application fields of GANs. For instance, WaveGAN was designed for waveform-based voice synthesis [71]. Similarly, MelGAN was developed for voice synthesis using high-quality Mel spectrograms, and it provided enhanced quality and naturalness to synthesised voices [72]. To expedite real-time voice waveform generation, ParallelWaveGAN was proposed [73]. Other generative models include MelGAN-VC, which enables conversation [74], and HiFi-GAN for high-fidelity voice synthesis, which provides greater quality and detail [75,76]. GANs have also been used for the creation of music and songs by blending the different styles and compositions of recognised musicians and composers [77].
However, new approaches to apply GANs are constantly emerging, e.g., in anomaly detection [78], data imbalance problems [79], probabilistic forecasting of financial time series [45], stock price prediction [80], etc.

3. Statistics on GAN Publications

In this section, the evolution of scientific articles related to GANs is presented. To this end, a search was conducted on 1 July 2023 using the Web of Science (WOS). In the search field, the keyword used was “Generative Adversarial” or “generative adversarial” or “GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL”.
References to countries and research areas were extracted exactly as they appear in the WOS.
The conducted search yielded a total of 18619 documents, categorised according to the type of publication, as shown in Table 1.
In this table, we can observe that 60 % of GAN publications are in the form of papers, and 38 % are papers of proceedings.
Furthermore, in Table 2, the countries with the highest number of publications on this topic are displayed (“Others” includes all countries with a percentage lower than 1 % ).
In this table, it can be observed that nearly half of all publications related to GANs originate from China, which showcases the country’s positioning in emerging technologies. With just over 20 % , the USA ranks second and is significantly ahead of other countries.

3.1. Evolution of GANs

The evolution of GANs over time is depicted in Figure 2. In this figure, an estimation of publications for the year 2023 is made based on a linear fit derived from the information collected in the table for previous years. The years 2014 and 2015 were not considered for the fit since the concept of GANs was still emerging and due to the lack of data to accurately model the real growth (on 1 July 2023, there were 1825 publications in the preceding 12 months).
It can be observed in this figure how the growth experienced by the papers addressing GANs follows an increasing trend that has not yet reached its peak since there are still fields, such as Business and Social Sciences, where the potential provided by this GAN tool to the scientific world remains to be fully explored.

3.2. Knowledge Areas and GANs

Table 3 has been obtained by taking into account the research areas collected by the WOS and reveals the most relevant research areas (areas that comprise at least 1 % of all publications).
Regarding the areas that feature a significant number of scientific publications for these GANs, the field of Computer Science stands out and encompasses a wide variety of applications in image processing, deep learning, and synthetic content generation [21,28,34,63,81].
The field of Engineering presents multiple applications, ranging from the optimisation of renewable energies to manufacturing and monitoring of structural health, which showcases its versatility and utility in solving real-world problems [82,83,84,85]. Of particular interest is the application to cognitive cars [86,87,88] and electronic home appliances [89].
Another field where numerous applications are found is in Imaging Science and Photographic Technology. This field is undergoing continuous evolution, for which GANs are contributing significant advancements [25,90,91,92,93,94,95]. It is a major challenge to enumerate the multitude of applications and problems addressed in this field that have been successfully resolved using GANs.
Work in Telecommunications also stands out [96,97,98,99,100,101].
In the field of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging, GANs appear particularly relevant regarding the processing and analysis of medical images by improving their quality and usefulness, aiding in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases, and facilitating advancements in research [102,103,104,105,106,107].
Of great significance is the field of Remote Sensing, where GANs have contributed towards enhancing the quality and quantity of data, thereby enabling the interpretation and analysis of images, and introducing new applications and techniques for monitoring and understanding our planet from space [108,109,110,111,112].
GANs have overcome limitations in the field of Optics related to resolution and quality in the reconstruction of diffracted images, thereby enhancing the capacity for observation and analysis [113,114,115].
In the field of Physics, GANs have contributed towards significant advances in simulation techniques, data analysis, and modelling across various domains, including computational physics, particle physics, and quantum physics [116,117,118,119,120,121].
In Chemistry, GANs have contributed towards advances in molecular techniques, drug discovery, organic synthesis, and the prediction of chemical properties, thereby opening doors for chemical and pharmaceutical research [122,123,124,125].
In the field of Instruments and Instrumentation, one can find studies applying GANs in deepfake detection, synthetic data generation, instrument calibration, and improvements in resolution in microscopy techniques [126,127,128,129].
In Automatic Control Systems, GANs have contributed innovative solutions in areas such as anomaly detection, system modelling, and synthetic data generation for the design and evaluation of control algorithms [130,131,132,133,134,135].
In Materials Science, GANs provide innovative solutions in areas such as material discovery, molecular design, structure optimisation, and the generation of compounds with specific properties [136,137,138,139].
In Geology, several significant applications are related to facies classification techniques, geological pattern generation, image enhancement, and detection of geological features [140,141,142,143].
In Mathematics, innovative solutions have been achieved in areas such as robust optimisation, graph generation, geometric modelling, image compression, and solving differential equations, expanding the capabilities and applications of GANs in the mathematical domain [95,144,145,146,147,148].
In the field of Science, Technology and other Topics, advances have been made in image generation techniques, enhancements in the quality and stability of GANs, as well as in the manipulation and control of features in image synthesis. These advances have propelled the field of computer vision and machine learning [28,59,60,63,149].
In Mathematical/Computational Biology, advances have been made in unsupervised learning techniques, synthetic data generation, molecular modelling, and analysis of biological images, thereby opening new perspectives in mathematical and biological research [21,150,151].
The application of GANs in Environmental Sciences and Ecology has developed innovative solutions for species distribution modelling, land cover prediction, environmental data analysis, and water quality monitoring, thereby enhancing our understanding and management of ecosystems and the environment [152,153].
Also, in the field of Acoustics, GANs have contributed significant solutions in areas such as audio synthesis, speech enhancement, sound simulation, and speaker verification, thereby enhancing the quality and robustness of acoustic signal processing [71,154,155,156,157,158].
In the field of Neurosciences and Neurology, GANs have achieved advancements in diagnostic techniques, synthetic data generation, analysis of brain signals, and the study of neurological diseases, thereby providing new insights and tools for the field of neuroscience and neurology [159,160,161].
When studying GANs in Geochemistry and Geophysics, significant advancements have been achieved in techniques for the estimation of petrophysical properties, seismic data inversion, interpretation of geophysical data, and modelling of subsurface structures. These advances enhance our understanding and analytical capabilities in exploring and characterising natural resources and geological processes [162,163,164,165,166].
In the field of Robotics, GANs have been applied in areas such as synthetic data generation, reinforcement learning enhancement, robotic perception, terrain classification, and robotic grasp improvement, thereby enhancing the capabilities and applications of robots in various environments and tasks [167,168,169,170,171].
In the field of Medical Informatics, studies on GANs have developed innovative solutions in areas such as the generation of synthetic medical images, anomaly detection, incomplete image reconstruction, and data synthesis to enhance the analysis and interpretation of medical images, thereby significantly impacting disease diagnosis and treatment [38,172,173,174,175].
In the field of Transportation, advances have been made in areas such as traffic flow prediction, traffic simulation, traffic sign translation, vehicle re-identification, and estimation of public transport demand, thereby enhancing the efficiency, safety, and sustainability of transportation systems [176,177,178,179,180].
In the field of Energy Fuels, GANs have been applied in energy forecasting techniques, optimisation of energy systems, design of renewable energy systems, and assessment of climate-change mitigation strategies, thereby enhancing our ability to address current energy and environmental challenges [181,182,183,184].
In Operations Research and Management Science, GAN applications encompass fields such as synthetic data generation, revenue management, fraud detection, supply-chain optimisation, and dynamic pricing. These applications improve decision-making and efficiency in operations and management processes [185,186,187,188].
However, there are still significant fields where the development of such models can offer major advances and advantages that are still emerging and hold great potential in their research. One of these fields is Business Economics, where GANs can provide solutions to major problems encountered in the economic world when conducting various studies of interest. This topic is addressed in the following section.

4. Statistics on GAN Publications in Economics

In the field of Economics, GANs constitute an emerging and highly promising tool, among other reasons due to their ability to generate synthetic data that can help to improve economic research and analysis. Researchers often face limitations in data availability, especially when dealing with economic data. It is worth noting that having access to synthetic data in these scenarios would help simulate and predict complex economic behaviours, thereby enabling the evaluation of various economic strategies and policies well in advance to facilitate appropriate decision-making tailored to each situation.
In order to highlight these advances in the economic field and to reveal the extensive potential this tool holds, we filter and analyse the selected bibliography by limiting it to research directly related to this field. Hence, the number of obtained papers is reduced to a total of 42 by the WOS in the the research areas considered: Business Economics (29), Social Issues (3), Mathematics Methods in Social Science (7), and Social Sciences Other Topics (9).
Out of these 42 publications, we select the publications that are categorised as research papers, narrowing down the number to 31. In order to analyse and present these research contributions more clearly, these papers are grouped into five specific fields identified by the researchers: Financial Economics (9), Management (4), Marketing and Publicity (8), Logistics Transport (5), and Others (5). These areas are analysed in the following sections.

4.1. Financial Economics

The publications on GANs in the field of Financial Economics are displayed in Table 4. The first paper [189] proposes an innovative optimisation framework for the portfolio optimisation problem by leveraging GANs to develop a heuristic approach to the classic Markowitz model. This involves three steps: (i) using a GAN to select the initial set of assets for investment, (ii) solving the portfolio optimisation problem to determine the weights of the assets from the previous step, and (iii) enhancing the obtained solutions.
In the year 2020, [190], proposed the use of CGAN for the calibration and aggregation of trading strategies. They designed an experiment involving multiple trading strategies across 579 assets and yielded successful results and clear advantages over other tools.
In [191], a data-driven approach is proposed to calibrate local stochastic volatility models using GANs, and it demonstrates its feasibility and showcases several significant advantages over other methods.
An approach using a GAN-based model, referred to as Quant GAN, is introduced in [192] for modelling discrete-time financial time series. Although the models of time series have historically been notably challenging to train, advances in GANs showcase their potential to provide competitive outcomes. Thus, as training procedures continue to evolve, GANs hold the promise of delivering even better performance in the future.
In [193], a GAN model named WCGAN-GP is developed to address the challenges existing in actuarial domains, since actuaries often require a great amount of data. Furthermore, the datasets employed by actuaries frequently encounter issues with imbalanced classes, wherein events of interest related to risk are underrepresented. The authors provide several contributions to actuaries, with applications including the generation of new samples, data augmentation, enhancement of predictive models, anomaly detection, and imputation of missing data.
Another paper from 2022 in the financial domain is [194], which addresses the problem of maximising utility under uncertain parameters through a robust optimisation process that can be interpreted as a stochastic differential game for two players with a zero-sum. This algorithm is tested in real markets and shows that robust portfolios tend to have higher expected utility and are more stable during market downturns. To solve the value function, the authors derive the analytical solution in the case of logarithmic utility and obtain numerical approximations using various methods, including GANs, and demonstrate a high level of accuracy in the numerical results.
It is well-known that the major complexity in valuing convertible bonds lies in modelling the underlying stock-return process. A GAN called DeepPricing that generates financial time series capable of replicating a risk-neutral stock return process while preserving statistical properties is presented in [195]. The authors declare that it is more flexible and accurate at capturing the dynamics of the underlying stock-return process.
The GANs used in [196] as generators of economic scenarios can be expanded into an entire internal market risk model by encompassing a suitable number of risk factors. The results obtained are comparable to regulatory-approved internal models in Europe. Hence, GANs can be considered as an alternative method for market risk modelling. Furthermore, the authors show how a GAN can serve as an economic scenario generator for market risk calculation within insurance companies.
A Wasserstein generative adversarial network with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP) is given in [197], where it is applied to the stock market, futures market, and cryptocurrency market. The results demonstrate that datasets generated from original asset prices by WGAN-GP simulate asset prices well, thereby showcasing the potential of a market simulator for trading analysis.

4.2. Management

All the studies in the field of Management found in the WOS are from the year 2022 and are presented in Table 5.
A study on the detection of credit card fraud using GANs to generate synthetic samples by explicitly considering the distribution of customers is presented in [186]. The conclusions state that using synthetically generated data has the potential to enhance model performance, and that this performance is sensitive to underlying customer distributions and data sources.
A framework is proposed in [198] to map the technological landscape of an emerging industry value chain through deep-learning-based patent analysis by using a GAN as a data augmentation method to overcome the issue of low-quality patent samples from emerging industries. It is demonstrated that limitations regarding data from emerging companies and class imbalance issues can be successfully addressed.
In [199], a technology robot called Pi-Mind is developed and evaluated; it acts as a responsible, resilient, ubiquitous cognitive clone (or a digital copy) and as an autonomous representative of a human decision-maker. To train the Pi-Mind agent to choose the most appropriate solution from among alternatives at critical decision points, the authors train agents using GANs.
The last paper in this category is [200], the authors of which propose a method for supply chain management. To tackle the challenge of a high number of decisions and limited data samples, they propose a dynamic supply chain member selection algorithm based on CGAN by dividing management into six areas: orders, purchases, production, inventory, distribution, and transportation.

4.3. Marketing and Publicity

Table 6 is obtained with respect to the field of Marketing and Publicity.
A comparative analysis is conducted in [201] on consumer preferences for a real fashion product versus a synthetically generated product created using CycleGAN. It was observed that the creation of new designs using GAN results in a higher perceived value of the product, which potentially generates co-creation value for customers, thereby enhancing their engagement and encouraging purchasing behaviour regardless of whether they are aware of the use of technology. The study suggests that using GAN technology can provide significant advantages by expanding the scope and scale of the product design process and by increasing perceived consumer value.
In [202], deepfakes are introduced into the marketing literature by proposing a typology, a conceptual framework, and a research agenda based on balanced centrality. This aims to guide future research on deepfakes in marketing studies, thereby allowing both companies and customers to benefit from deepfakes while also safeguarding against potential risks.
The study presented by [203] proposes a mechanism to automate the generation of textual ads and combines a GAN model with reinforcement learning to optimise the generation of advertising texts.
Along the same lines as the aforementioned articles, Ref. [204] constructs a general framework to better understand consumers’ responses to all forms of advertising manipulation; the researchers are aided by digital and automatic tools that enable advertisers to automate many advertising processes and to produce increasingly sophisticated synthetic ads. These same authors continue by analysing the impact of this increasingly pervasive trend of ad automation. In Ref. [205], the authors show that these AI-based tools, in the same way as GANs, may bring potentially drastic changes to the way ads are conceived, produced, edited, and directed. They also examine the associated ethical issues.
Another important aspect in this field is customer privacy. Ref. [206] demonstrate that recent advances in machine learning enable companies to transfer a generative model instead of using real data. They show the effectiveness of GANs for preserving the desired characteristics of the original data, which offers advantages both in terms of privacy and scalability. GANs outperform benchmark models in solving marketing problems and alleviate the logistical and computational burden for data providers since they only need to train one GAN model that can solve various marketing problems. This approach is advantageous in terms of both volume and speed.
To influence the aesthetic design process, Ref. [207] propose a model that combines a probabilistic variational autoencoder (VAE) with adversarial components from a GAN and a supervised learning component. The model is tested in the automotive sector and demonstrates a significant improvement compared to conventional machine learning models and neural networks.
Lastly in this section, the work by [208] introduces an innovative approach to user modelling that preserves privacy for digital marketing campaigns by combining learning techniques and GANs. This allows users to retain control of their personal data while enabling marketing professionals to identify suitable behaviours for their campaigns.

4.4. Logistic Transport

In the field of Logistic Transport, there are several papers available (see Table 7).
These studies address the challenge of anticipating potential accidents. However, they encounter imbalanced and limited datasets, leading to a low incident-detection rate and a high false-alarm rate in detection models. In this context, the study by [209] proposes a new incident detection framework based on GANs. Experimental results demonstrate a significant enhancement in the detection rate and a reduction in false-alarm rates.
In the paper by [210], the issue of requiring a large labelled dataset regarding travel modes to avoid congestion is addressed. Often, these travel modes are unbalanced in their representation. Hence, the authors develop a hybrid travel-mode detection model using neural networks and GANs. The GANs are employed to augment the size of the dataset and balance it, thereby enhancing the accuracy of the detection model.
On the other hand, in order to address the concern of predicting collisions in real-time, Ref. [211] proposes a new data architecture inspired by images that is capable of capturing the microscopic scene in which vehicular interactions occur. For this purpose, an accident prediction model is constructed using multi-input convolutional neural networks and by employing various oversampling methodologies to balance the training data. The authors ascertain that the best results are achieved using deep convolutional generative adversarial networks (DCGANs) with random undersampling.
The same topic is addressed in [212], but from the perspective of spatio–temporal transferability. A combination of a GAN and transfer learning is used to examine the transferability of real-time collision prediction models in an extremely imbalanced data environment. The practical application involves using a Wasserstein GAN (WGAN) to generate synthetic collision data since the initial dataset had an extreme imbalance between collision and non-collision data. The study revealed that direct transferability is not feasible. However, the models become spatio–temporally transferable in terms of time and space when transfer learning is applied.
The last study obtained in this field, by [213], proposes a MoGAN model to generate realistic urban mobility networks. This is applied to public bicycle and taxi travel data and demonstrates increased realism compared to classical gravity and radiation models. Moreover, it can be used for data augmentation, simulations, and hypothetical analyses.

4.5. Others

Finally, those studies that did not directly correspond to Economics were grouped under the title “Others” (see Table 8).
A GAN model called Lung-GAN is introduced in [214] and is trained to interpret images of lung disease to enable early diagnosis, thereby improving survival rates.
In [215], the missing-data problem is addressed due to the lack of responses in survey sampling using deep-learning models.
In [216], the use of GANs for cybersecurity analysis is proposed and addresses the challenge of the limited labelled data used by current machine learning models trained by humans.
The aim of [217] involved fall prevention to reduce medical costs. These authors utilise a hidden Markov model with a generative adversarial network (HMM-GAN).
In [218], the origins of deepfakes are traced back to the inception of GANs; this phenomenon is reviewed, and the authors present recent statistics, prevalent application domains, risks, and opportunities. The authors analyse the latest bibliography and highlight the novelty of a scenario where falsehoods in human societies and cultures are predominantly produced by machines. This paper underscores the importance of a semiotic and interdisciplinary study of these productions.

5. Why Use GANs in Business Economics?

Given that the main aim of GANs involves the automatic generation of data, we ask when and how can they be used in Economics. These networks can be utilised to expand the size of the working set, since data availability in most economic problems is often scarce yet crucial. This helps researchers to develop mechanisms that are essential for making economic, business, and commercial decisions, which is pivotal for the proper functioning of the sector.
On the other hand, anomaly detection is highly sought-after in this field for the detection of credit card fraud, insurance fraud, and banking operations. In these problems, there is often an imbalance issue, with only a small amount of data in the relevant class compared to abundant data in the other class. In this scenario, GANs can be conditioned to generate data for the minority class since it is well-known that models perform better when data are balanced.
Another issue that can be addressed using GANs is that of time-series data, which can simulate temporal series and stochastic processes for risk management, financial projections, stock prediction, monetary policy formulation, price evolution, capital modelling, solvency projection, reserve management, asset and liability management, and mortality projections, among others.
Another significant issue that can be addressed by GANs is privacy preservation, given that most business data and other information may be secret, confidential, and/or sensitive. For instance, a company such as a private hospital could withhold its real patient database by generating a set of synthetic data with the same characteristics as the real patients, even though these patients do not exist. This method preserves privacy while allowing the use of data to create models that improve the practices of this and other hospitals.
Another problem is that of missing data, which affects the field of business economics and poses a challenge when applying analytical methods that are often unprepared for missing datasets.
One of the key advantages GANs offer over conventional methods in solving these aforementioned issues involves their operation through supervised learning, which enhances the performance of the models.

6. Conclusions

Throughout the numerous publications analysed, the success of the application of GANs for addressing various problems in many diverse areas of knowledge has been demonstrated.
However, it has been shown that GANs have hitherto been underutilised in issues related to the Economic Business field.
Given the range of economic problems with which GANs can assist researchers and can yield promising results, often surpassing those achieved by current techniques, we believe that GANs should be more frequently employed. GANs could offer a new perspective on several of the most current and diverse issues in this area and could potentially provide a range of superior outcomes in many situations compared to the outcomes of existing methodologies. It has also been observed that some papers related to Economics are categorised under other areas of knowledge. For instance, Refs. [219,220,221,222,223,224,225] are all listed under the area of Computer Science. However, even with a change in these categorisations, the utilisation of GANs in Economic problems still remains very limited.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G.-A. and A.R.-G.; methodology, L.G.-A. and A.R.-G.; software, L.G.-A. and A.R.-G.; validation, L.G.-A. and A.R.-G.; investigation, L.G.-A. and A.R.-G.; resources, A.R.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.-G.; writing—review and editing, A.R.-G. and L.G.-A.; visualization, L.G.-A.; supervision, A.R.-G.; project administration, L.G.-A.; funding acquisition, L.G.-A. and A.R.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (AEI/FEDER, UE) under grant number PID2022-141045OB-C42 (research project: generation of reliable synthetic health data for federated learning in secure data spaces).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Goodfellow, I.; Pouget-Abadie, J.; Mirza, M.; Xu, B.; Warde-Farley, D.; Ozair, S.; Courville, A.; Bengio, Y. Generative adversarial nets. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, Montreal, QC, Canada, 8–13 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gonog, L.; Zhou, Y. A review: Generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Xi’an, China, 19–21 June 2019; pp. 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Creswell, A.; White, T.; Dumoulin, V.; Arulkumaran, K.; Sengupta, B.; Bharath, A.A. Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2018, 35, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aggarwal, A.; Mittal, M.; Battineni, G. Generative adversarial network: An overview of theory and applications. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2021, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hong, Y.; Hwang, U.; Yoo, J.; Yoon, S. How generative adversarial networks and their variants work: An overview. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2019, 52, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gui, J.; Sun, Z.; Wen, Y.; Tao, D.; Ye, J. A review on generative adversarial networks: Algorithms, theory, and applications. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2021, 35, 3313–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cheng, J.; Yang, Y.; Tang, X.; Xiong, N.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, F. Generative Adversarial Networks: A Literature Review. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2020, 14. [Google Scholar]
  8. Neumann, V.J. Zur theorie der gesellschaftsspiele. Math. Ann. 1928, 100, 295–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salimans, T.; Goodfellow, I.; Zaremba, W.; Cheung, V.; Radford, A.; Chen, X. Improved techniques for training GANs. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29, Barcelona, Spain, 5–10 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ge, H.; Xia, Y.; Chen, X.; Berry, R.; Wu, Y. Fictitious GAN: Training GANs with historical models. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1803.08647. [Google Scholar]
  11. Heusel, M.; Ramsauer, H.; Unterthiner, T.; Nessler, B.; Hochreiter, S. GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. In Proceedings of the NIPS’17: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA, 4–9 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bynagari, N.B. GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local Nash equilibrium. Asian J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 2019, 8, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gonzalez-Abril, L.; Angulo, C.; Ortega, J.A.; Lopez-Guerra, J.L. Statistical Validation of Synthetic Data for Lung Cancer Patients Generated by Using Generative Adversarial Networks. Electronics 2022, 11, 3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arjovsky, M.; Bottou, L. Towards principled methods for training generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1701.04862. [Google Scholar]
  15. Farnia, F.; Ozdaglar, A. Do GANs always have Nash equilibria? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Online, 12–18 July 2020; pp. 3029–3039. [Google Scholar]
  16. Belomestny, D.; Moulines, E.; Naumov, A.; Puchkin, N.; Samsonov, S. Rates of convergence for density estimation with generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2102.00199. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, Z.; Luo, C.; Yu, J. Towards the gradient vanishing, divergence mismatching and mode collapse of generative adversarial nets. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Beijing, China, 3–7 November 2019; pp. 2377–2380. [Google Scholar]
  18. Al-Ragehi, A.; Abdulkadir, S.J.; Muneer, A.; Sadeq, S.; Al-Tashi, Q. Hyper-Parameter Optimization of Semi-Supervised GANs Based-Sine Cosine Algorithm for Multimedia Datasets. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 73, 2169–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, B.; Liu, Y.; Wei, L.; Xu, Q. Towards imperceptible and robust adversarial example attacks against neural networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2–7 February 2018; Volume 32. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mirza, M.; Osindero, S. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1411.1784. [Google Scholar]
  21. Radford, A.; Metz, L.; Chintala, S. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1511.06434. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dumoulin, V.; Visin, F. A guide to convolution arithmetic for deep learning. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1603.07285. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chollet, F. Deep Learning Mit Python und Keras: Das Praxis-Handbuch vom Entwickler der Keras-Bibliothek; MITP-Verlags GmbH & Co. KG: Göttingen, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Denton, E.L.; Chintala, S.; Szlam, A.; Fergus, R. Deep generative image models using a laplacian pyramid of adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada, 7–12 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ledig, C.; Theis, L.; Huszár, F.; Caballero, J.; Cunningham, A.; Acosta, A.; Aitken, A.; Tejani, A.; Totz, J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017; pp. 4681–4690. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, H.; Xu, T.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Huang, X.; Metaxas, D.N. StackGAN: Text to photo-realistic image synthesis with stacked generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 22–29 October 2017; pp. 5907–5915. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, H.; Xu, T.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Huang, X.; Metaxas, D.N. StackGAN plus plus: Realistic Image Synthesis with Stacked Generative Adversarial Networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019, 41, 1947–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, J.Y.; Park, T.; Isola, P.; Efros, A.A. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 22–29 October 2017; pp. 2223–2232. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hitaj, B.; Gasti, P.; Ateniese, G.; Perez-Cruz, F. PassGAN: A deep learning approach for password guessing. In Proceedings of the Applied Cryptography and Network Security: 17th International Conference, ACNS 2019, Bogota, Colombia, 5–7 June 2019; Proceedings 17. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 217–237. [Google Scholar]
  30. Arjovsky, M.; Chintala, S.; Bottou, L. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Sydney, Australia, 6–11 August 2017; pp. 214–223. [Google Scholar]
  31. Qin, C.; Gao, X. Spatio-Temporal Generative Adversarial Networks. Chin. J. Electron. 2020, 29, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chao, X.; Cao, J.; Lu, Y.; Dai, Q.; Liang, S. Constrained generative adversarial networks. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 19208–19218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Elakkiya, R.; Vijayakumar, P.; Kumar, N. An optimized Generative Adversarial Network based continuous sign language classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 182, 115276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Isola, P.; Zhu, J.Y.; Zhou, T.; Efros, A.A. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017; pp. 1125–1134. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shin, S.Y.; Kang, Y.W.; Kim, Y.G. Android-GAN: Defending against android pattern attacks using multi-modal generative network as anomaly detector. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020, 141, 112964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, M.Y.; Breuel, T.; Kautz, J. Unsupervised image-to-image translation networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA, 4–9 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jolicoeur-Martineau, A. The relativistic discriminator: A key element missing from standard GAN. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1807.00734. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schlegl, T.; Seeböck, P.; Waldstein, S.M.; Schmidt-Erfurth, U.; Langs, G. Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Oaxaca, Mexico, 25–30 June 2017; pp. 146–157. [Google Scholar]
  39. Akcay, S.; Atapour-Abarghouei, A.; Breckon, T.P. GANomaly: Semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ACCV 2018: 14th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Perth, Australia, 2–6 December 2018; Revised Selected Papers, Part III 14. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 622–637. [Google Scholar]
  40. Esteban, C.; Hyland, S.L.; Rätsch, G. Real-valued (medical) time series generation with recurrent conditional GANs. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1706.02633. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhu, S.; Qing, C.; Chen, C.; Xu, X. Emotional generative adversarial network for image emotion transfer. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 216, 119485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yoon, J.; Jarrett, D.; Van der Schaar, M. Time-series generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jiang, Y.; Chang, S.; Wang, Z. Transgan: Two pure transformers can make one strong gan, and that can scale up. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Online, 6–14 December 2021; pp. 14745–14758. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lv, Z.; Huang, X.; Cao, W. An improved GAN with transformers for pedestrian trajectory prediction models. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2022, 37, 4417–4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, H.; Qu, W.; Long, H.; Chen, M. The Intelligent Advertising Image Generation Using Generative Adversarial Networks and Vision Transformer: A Novel Approach in Digital Marketing. J. Organ. End User Comput. (JOEUC) 2024, 36, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dhariwal, P.; Nichol, A. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34, Online, 6–14 December 2021; pp. 8780–8794. [Google Scholar]
  47. Croitoru, F.A.; Hondru, V.; Ionescu, R.T.; Shah, M. Diffusion models in vision: A survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023, 45, 10850–10869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saharia, C.; Chan, W.; Chang, H.; Lee, C.; Ho, J.; Salimans, T.; Fleet, D.; Norouzi, M. Palette: Image-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2022, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–11 August 2022; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jiang, Z.; Ren, Y.; Ye, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Q.; Ji, S.; Huang, R.; Wang, C.; Yin, X.; et al. Mega-tts: Zero-shot text-to-speech at scale with intrinsic inductive bias. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.03509. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ren, Y.; Lei, M.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Q.; Yan, Z.; Zhao, Z. Prosospeech: Enhancing prosody with quantized vector pre-training in text-to-speech. In Proceedings of the ICASSP 2022—2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Virtual Conference, 22–27 May 2022; pp. 7577–7581. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gonzalez-Abril, L.; Angulo, C.; Ortega, J.A.; Lopez-Guerra, J.L. Generative Adversarial Networks for Anonymized Healthcare of Lung Cancer Patients. Electronics 2021, 10, 2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y. SeqGAN: Sequence generative adversarial nets with policy gradient. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA, 4–9 February 2017; Volume 31. [Google Scholar]
  53. Xu, L.; Skoularidou, M.; Cuesta-Infante, A.; Veeramachaneni, K. Modeling tabular data using conditional GAN. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
  54. Guo, J.; Lu, S.; Cai, H.; Zhang, W.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J. Long text generation via adversarial training with leaked information. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2–7 February 2018; Volume 32. [Google Scholar]
  55. Lin, K.; Li, D.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, M.T. Adversarial ranking for language generation. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Gan, Z.; Fan, K.; Chen, Z.; Henao, R.; Shen, D.; Carin, L. Adversarial feature matching for text generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Sydney, Australia, 6–11 August 2017; pp. 4006–4015. [Google Scholar]
  57. Keskar, N.S.; McCann, B.; Varshney, L.R.; Xiong, C.; Socher, R. Ctrl: A conditional transformer language model for controllable generation. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.05858. [Google Scholar]
  58. Microsoft. OpenAI Licenses GPT-3 Technology to Microsoft. 2020. Available online: https://openai.com/index/openai-licenses-gpt-3-technology-to-microsoft/ (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  59. Karras, T.; Aila, T.; Laine, S.; Lehtinen, J. Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1710.10196. [Google Scholar]
  60. Karras, T.; Laine, S.; Aila, T. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA, 16–20 June 2019; pp. 4401–4410. [Google Scholar]
  61. Karras, T.; Laine, S.; Aittala, M.; Hellsten, J.; Lehtinen, J.; Aila, T. Analyzing and improving the image quality of styleGAN. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Online, 14–19 June 2020; pp. 8110–8119. [Google Scholar]
  62. Karras, T.; Aittala, M.; Laine, S.; Härkönen, E.; Hellsten, J.; Lehtinen, J.; Aila, T. Alias-free generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Online, 6–14 December2021; pp. 852–863. [Google Scholar]
  63. Brock, A.; Donahue, J.; Simonyan, K. Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1809.11096. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ma, L.; Jia, X.; Sun, Q.; Schiele, B.; Tuytelaars, T.; Van Gool, L. Pose guided person image generation. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, Long Beach, CA, USA, 4–9 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  65. Antipov, G.; Baccouche, M.; Dugelay, J.L. Face aging with conditional generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Beijing, China, 17–20 September 2017; pp. 2089–2093. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yu, J.; Lin, Z.; Yang, J.; Shen, X.; Lu, X.; Huang, T.S. Generative image inpainting with contextual attention. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–22 June 2018; pp. 5505–5514. [Google Scholar]
  67. Yu, J.; Lin, Z.; Yang, J.; Shen, X.; Lu, X.; Huang, T.S. Free-form image inpainting with gated convolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 27 October–2 November 2019; pp. 4471–4480. [Google Scholar]
  68. Mao, X.; Shen, C.; Yang, Y.B. Image restoration using very deep convolutional encoder-decoder networks with symmetric skip connections. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 5–10 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang, K.; Zuo, W.; Chen, Y.; Meng, D.; Zhang, L. Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2017, 26, 3142–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, K.; Zuo, W.; Zhang, L. FFDNet: Toward a fast and flexible solution for CNN-based image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2018, 27, 4608–4622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Donahue, C.; McAuley, J.; Puckette, M. Adversarial audio synthesis. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1802.04208. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kumar, K.; Kumar, R.; De Boissiere, T.; Gestin, L.; Teoh, W.Z.; Sotelo, J.; De Brebisson, A.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A.C. MelGAN: Generative adversarial networks for conditional waveform synthesis. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yamamoto, R.; Song, E.; Kim, J.M. Parallel WaveGAN: A fast waveform generation model based on generative adversarial networks with multi-resolution spectrogram. In Proceedings of the ICASSP 2020—2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Online, 4–8 May 2020; pp. 6199–6203. [Google Scholar]
  74. Pasini, M. MelGAN-VC: Voice conversion and audio style transfer on arbitrarily long samples using spectrograms. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1910.03713. [Google Scholar]
  75. Su, J.; Jin, Z.; Finkelstein, A. HiFi-GAN: High-fidelity denoising and dereverberation based on speech deep features in adversarial networks. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2006.05694. [Google Scholar]
  76. Kong, J.; Kim, J.; Bae, J. Hifi-GAN: Generative adversarial networks for efficient and high fidelity speech synthesis. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Online, 6–12 December2020; pp. 17022–17033. [Google Scholar]
  77. Mukherjee, S.; Mulimani, M. ComposeInStyle: Music composition with and without Style Transfer. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 191, 116195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lim, W.; Yong, K.S.C.; Lau, B.T.; Tan, C.C.L. Future of generative adversarial networks (GAN) for anomaly detection in network security: A review. Comput. Secur. 2024, 139, 103733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Huseyn, M.; Ruiz-Gándara, Á.; González-Abril, L.; Romero, I. Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Spain: The Role of Competences and Skills. Amfiteatru Econ. 2024, 26, 848–866. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang, J.; Chen, Z. Factor-GAN: Enhancing stock price prediction and factor investment with Generative Adversarial Networks. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0306094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, H.; Goodfellow, I.; Metaxas, D.; Odena, A. Self-attention generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Long Beach, CA, USA, 9–15 June 2019; pp. 7354–7363. [Google Scholar]
  82. Svoboda, J.; Anoosheh, A.; Osendorfer, C.; Masci, J. Two-stage peer-regularized feature recombination for arbitrary image style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Online, 14–19 June 2020; pp. 13816–13825. [Google Scholar]
  83. Regenwetter, L.; Nobari, A.H.; Ahmed, F. Deep generative models in engineering design: A review. J. Mech. Des. 2022, 144, 071704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, L.; Chan, Y.C.; Ahmed, F.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, P.; Chen, W. Deep generative modeling for mechanistic-based learning and design of metamaterial systems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2020, 372, 113377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, C.; Park, S.H.; Chen, D.; Lin, D.W.; Xiong, W.; Kuo, H.C.; Lin, C.F.; Cao, H.; Han, J. Mesoporous GAN for Photonic Engineering Highly Reflective GAN Mirrors as an Example. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, C.; Khurshid, S. DeepRoad: GAN-based metamorphic testing and input validation framework for autonomous driving systems. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 3–7 September 2018; pp. 132–142. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ghosh, A.; Bhattacharya, B.; Chowdhury, S.B.R. Sad-gan: Synthetic autonomous driving using generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1611.08788. [Google Scholar]
  88. Marfia, G.; Roccetti, M.; Amoroso, A.; Gerla, M.; Pau, G.; Lim, J.H. Cognitive cars: Constructing a cognitive playground for VANET research testbeds 2011. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Radio and Advanced Spectrum Management, Paris, France, 5–7 September 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Palazzi, C.E.; Ferretti, S.; Roccetti, M.; Pau, G.; Gerla, M. What’s in that magic box? The home entertainment center’s special protocol potion, revealed. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2006, 52, 1280–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Luan, F.; Paris, S.; Shechtman, E.; Bala, K. Deep photo style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017; pp. 4990–4998. [Google Scholar]
  91. Yang, C.; Lu, X.; Lin, Z.; Shechtman, E.; Wang, O.; Li, H. High-resolution image inpainting using multi-scale neural patch synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017; pp. 6721–6729. [Google Scholar]
  92. Chen, C.; Chen, Q.; Xu, J.; Koltun, V. Learning to see in the dark. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–22 June 2018; pp. 3291–3300. [Google Scholar]
  93. Reed, S.; Akata, Z.; Yan, X.; Logeswaran, L.; Schiele, B.; Lee, H. Generative adversarial text to image synthesis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, New York, NY, USA, 19–24 June 2016; pp. 1060–1069. [Google Scholar]
  94. Wang, T.C.; Liu, M.Y.; Zhu, J.Y.; Tao, A.; Kautz, J.; Catanzaro, B. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional GANs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–22 June 2018; pp. 8798–8807. [Google Scholar]
  95. Agustsson, E.; Tschannen, M.; Mentzer, F.; Timofte, R.; Gool, L.V. Generative adversarial networks for extreme learned image compression. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 27 October–2 November 2019; pp. 221–231. [Google Scholar]
  96. Liao, Y.; Hua, Y.; Cai, Y. Deep learning based channel estimation algorithm for fast time-varying MIMO-OFDM systems. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2019, 24, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ye, H.; Li, G.Y.; Juang, B.H. Power of deep learning for channel estimation and signal detection in OFDM systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2017, 7, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Adesina, D.; Hsieh, C.C.; Sagduyu, Y.E.; Qian, L. Adversarial machine learning in wireless communications using RF data: A review. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 25, 77–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kasgari, A.T.Z.; Saad, W.; Mozaffari, M.; Poor, H.V. Experienced deep reinforcement learning with generative adversarial networks (GANs) for model-free ultra reliable low latency communication. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020, 69, 884–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gong, J.; Xu, X.; Lei, Y. Unsupervised specific emitter identification method using radio-frequency fingerprint embedded InfoGAN. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2020, 15, 2898–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, X.Y.; Wang, X. Real-time indoor localization for smartphones using tensor-generative adversarial nets. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2020, 32, 3433–3443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zadeh, F.S.; Molani, S.; Orouskhani, M.; Rezaei, M.; Shafiei, M.; Abbasi, H. Generative Adversarial Networks for Brain Images Synthesis: A Review. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.15421. [Google Scholar]
  103. Johnson, J.W. Generative adversarial networks in medical imaging. In State of the Art in Neural Networks and Their Applications; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 271–278. [Google Scholar]
  104. Frid-Adar, M.; Diamant, I.; Klang, E.; Amitai, M.; Goldberger, J.; Greenspan, H. GAN-based synthetic medical image augmentation for increased CNN performance in liver lesion classification. Neurocomputing 2018, 321, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wolterink, J.M.; Leiner, T.; Viergever, M.A.; Išgum, I. Generative adversarial networks for noise reduction in low-dose CT. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2017, 36, 2536–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Islam, J.; Zhang, Y. GAN-based synthetic brain PET image generation. Brain Inform. 2020, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, C.; Yang, G.; Papanastasiou, G.; Tsaftaris, S.A.; Newby, D.E.; Gray, C.; Macnaught, G.; MacGillivray, T.J. DiCyc: GAN-based deformation invariant cross-domain information fusion for medical image synthesis. Inf. Fusion 2021, 67, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Du, B. Deep learning for remote sensing data: A technical tutorial on the state of the art. IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Mag. 2016, 4, 22–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cao, X.; Zhou, F.; Xu, L.; Meng, D.; Xu, Z.; Paisley, J. Hyperspectral image classification with Markov random fields and a convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2018, 27, 2354–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Audebert, N.; Le Saux, B.; Lefèvre, S. Deep learning for classification of hyperspectral data: A comparative review. IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Mag. 2019, 7, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lu, T.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, J. Satellite image super-resolution via multi-scale residual deep neural network. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Liu, B.; Li, H.; Zhou, Y.; Peng, Y.; Elazab, A.; Wang, C. A super resolution method for remote sensing images based on cascaded conditional wasserstein GANs. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP), Online, 17–19 December 2020; pp. 284–289. [Google Scholar]
  113. Ni, Y.; Zhou, D.; Yuan, S.; Bai, X.; Xu, Z.; Chen, J.; Li, C.; Zhou, X. Color computational ghost imaging based on a generative adversarial network. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 1840–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ma, T.; Tobah, M.; Wang, H.; Guo, L.J. Benchmarking deep learning-based models on nanophotonic inverse design problems. Opto-Electron. Sci. 2022, 1, 210012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ma, J.; Zhang, H.; Shao, Z.; Liang, P.; Xu, H. GANMcC: A generative adversarial network with multiclassification constraints for infrared and visible image fusion. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 70, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Tompson, J.; Schlachter, K.; Sprechmann, P.; Perlin, K. Accelerating eulerian fluid simulation with convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Sydney, Australia, 6–11 August 2017; pp. 3424–3433. [Google Scholar]
  117. Paganini, M.; de Oliveira, L.; Nachman, B. CaloGAN: Simulating 3D high energy particle showers in multilayer electromagnetic calorimeters with generative adversarial networks. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 014021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rehm, F.; Vallecorsa, S.; Saletore, V.; Pabst, H.; Chaibi, A.; Codreanu, V.; Borras, K.; Krücker, D. Reduced precision strategies for deep learning: A high energy physics generative adversarial network use case. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2103.10142. [Google Scholar]
  119. de Oliveira, L.; Paganini, M.; Nachman, B. Learning particle physics by example: Location-aware generative adversarial networks for physics synthesis. Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 2017, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kasieczka, G.; Plehn, T.; Butter, A.; Cranmer, K.; Debnath, D.; Dillon, B.M.; Fairbairn, M.; Faroughy, D.A.; Fedorko, W.; Gay, C.; et al. The machine learning landscape of top taggers. SciPost Phys. 2019, 7, 014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dallaire-Demers, P.L.; Killoran, N. Quantum generative adversarial networks. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 012324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wei, J.N.; Duvenaud, D.; Aspuru-Guzik, A. Neural networks for the prediction of organic chemistry reactions. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Butler, K.T.; Davies, D.W.; Cartwright, H.; Isayev, O.; Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 2018, 559, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rifaioglu, A.S.; Atas, H.; Martin, M.J.; Cetin-Atalay, R.; Atalay, V.; Doğan, T. Recent applications of deep learning and machine intelligence on in silico drug discovery: Methods, tools and databases. Briefings Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1878–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Popova, M.; Isayev, O.; Tropsha, A. Deep reinforcement learning for de novo drug design. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaap7885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Güera, D.; Delp, E.J. Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 15–16 July 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  127. Zhou, X.; Hu, Y.; Wu, J.; Liang, W.; Ma, J.; Jin, Q. Distribution bias aware collaborative generative adversarial network for imbalanced deep learning in industrial IoT. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 19, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zou, Y.; Chen, J.; Wei, X. A calibration optimization method for a welding robot laser vision system based on generative adversarial network. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 2514713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hyun, Y.; Kim, D. Development of deep-learning-based single-molecule localization image analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhou, P.; Li, C.; Chen, C.; Wu, D.; Fei, M. PAD: Privacy-Preserved Payload Anomaly Detection for Industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2023, 20, 5103–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Araujo-Filho, P.F.d.; Kaddoum, G.; Campelo, D.R.; Santos, A.G.; Macêdo, D.; Zanchettin, C. Intrusion detection for cyber–physical systems using generative adversarial networks in fog environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 6247–6256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wachel, P.; Rojas, C. An Adversarial Approach to Adaptive Model Predictive Control. J. Adv. Appl. Comput. Math. 2022, 9, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Silva, S.H.; Najafirad, P. Opportunities and challenges in deep learning adversarial robustness: A survey. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2007.00753. [Google Scholar]
  134. Alabugin, S.K.; Sokolov, A.N. Applying of generative adversarial networks for anomaly detection in industrial control systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 Global Smart Industry Conference (GloSIC), Chelyabinsk, Russia, 17–19 November 2020; pp. 199–203. [Google Scholar]
  135. Parthasarathy, D.; Bäckstrom, K.; Henriksson, J.; Einarsdóttir, S. Controlled time series generation for automotive software-in-the-loop testing using GANs. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Testing (AITest), Oxford, UK, 3–6 August 2020; pp. 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  136. Pyzer-Knapp, E.O.; Pitera, J.W.; Staar, P.W.; Takeda, S.; Laino, T.; Sanders, D.P.; Sexton, J.; Smith, J.R.; Curioni, A. Accelerating materials discovery using artificial intelligence, high performance computing and robotics. npj Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Elton, D.C.; Boukouvalas, Z.; Fuge, M.D.; Chung, P.W. Deep learning for molecular design—A review of the state of the art. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2019, 4, 828–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ookawara, S.; Yasuda, T.; Matsuda, Y.; Yoshikawa, S.; Matsumoto, H. Machine learning in porous materials: SVM-based characterization and CGAN-driven materials discovery and design. In Machine Learning in Materials Informatics: Methods and Applications; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; pp. 181–209. [Google Scholar]
  139. Jabbar, R.; Jabbar, R.; Kamoun, S. Recent progress in generative adversarial networks applied to inversely designing inorganic materials: A brief review. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2022, 213, 111612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, X.; Song, H. Automatic identification of fossils and abiotic grains during carbonate microfacies analysis using deep convolutional neural networks. Sediment. Geol. 2020, 410, 105790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Li, G.; Qiao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Wu, W. Semi-supervised learning based on generative adversarial network and its applied to lithology recognition. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 67428–67437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Dupont, E.; Zhang, T.; Tilke, P.; Liang, L.; Bailey, W. Generating realistic geology conditioned on physical measurements with generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1802.03065. [Google Scholar]
  143. Mizuochi, H.; Iijima, Y.; Nagano, H.; Kotani, A.; Hiyama, T. Dynamic mapping of subarctic surface water by fusion of microwave and optical satellite data using conditional adversarial networks. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhao, S.; You, F. Distributionally robust chance constrained programming with generative adversarial networks (GANs). AIChE J. 2020, 66, e16963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Li, Y.; Vinyals, O.; Dyer, C.; Pascanu, R.; Battaglia, P. Learning deep generative models of graphs. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1803.03324. [Google Scholar]
  146. Kleineberg, M.; Fey, M.; Weichert, F. Adversarial generation of continuous implicit shape representations. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2002.00349. [Google Scholar]
  147. Qin, C.; Wu, Y.; Springenberg, J.T.; Brock, A.; Donahue, J.; Lillicrap, T.; Kohli, P. Training generative adversarial networks by solving ordinary differential equations. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Online, 6–12 December 2020; pp. 5599–5609. [Google Scholar]
  148. Jeon, J.; Kim, J.; Song, H.; Cho, S.; Park, N. GT-GAN: General Purpose Time Series Synthesis with Generative Adversarial Networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, 28 November–9 December 2022; pp. 36999–37010. [Google Scholar]
  149. Shaham, T.R.; Dekel, T.; Michaeli, T. SinGAN: Learning a Generative Model from a Single Natural Image. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 27 October–2 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  150. Gu, H.; Xian, Y.; Unarta, I.C.; Yao, Y. Generative Adversarial Networks for Robust Cryo-EM Image Denoising. In Handbook of Mathematical Models and Algorithms in Computer Vision and Imaging: Mathematical Imaging and Vision; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 969–1000. [Google Scholar]
  151. Bau, D.; Zhu, J.Y.; Strobelt, H.; Zhou, B.; Tenenbaum, J.B.; Freeman, W.T.; Torralba, A. GAN dissection: Visualizing and understanding generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1811.10597. [Google Scholar]
  152. Madhu, A.; Kumaraswamy, S. Data augmentation using generative adversarial network for environmental sound classification. In Proceedings of the 2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), A Coruña, Spain, 2–6 September 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  153. Yan, J.; Gao, Q.; Yu, Y.; Chen, L.; Xu, Z.; Chen, J. Combining knowledge graph with deep adversarial network for water quality prediction. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 10360–10376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Hu, H.; Tan, T.; Qian, Y. Generative adversarial networks based data augmentation for noise robust speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Calgary, AB, Canada, 15–20 April 2018; pp. 5044–5048. [Google Scholar]
  155. Hao, X.; Su, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Batushiren. UNetGAN: A robust speech enhancement approach in time domain for extremely low signal-to-noise ratio condition. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.15521. [Google Scholar]
  156. Miyato, T.; Dai, A.M.; Goodfellow, I. Adversarial training methods for semi-supervised text classification. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1605.07725. [Google Scholar]
  157. Ratnarajah, A.; Tang, Z.; Manocha, D. IR-GAN: Room impulse response generator for far-field speech recognition. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.13219. [Google Scholar]
  158. Michelsanti, D.; Tan, Z.H. Conditional generative adversarial networks for speech enhancement and noise-robust speaker verification. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1709.01703. [Google Scholar]
  159. Malik, R.; Chughtai, Z.A.; Chugtai, S. Brain tumor image generations using Deep Convolutional Generative adversarial networks: (DCGAN). Int. J. Comput. Innov. Sci. 2022, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  160. Barile, B.; Marzullo, A.; Stamile, C.; Durand-Dubief, F.; Sappey-Marinier, D. Data augmentation using generative adversarial neural networks on brain structural connectivity in multiple sclerosis. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2021, 206, 106113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Cao, Y.; Kuai, H.; Liang, P.; Pan, J.S.; Yan, J.; Zhong, N. BNLoop-GAN: A multi-loop generative adversarial model on brain network learning to classify Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1202382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Mosser, L.; Dubrule, O.; Blunt, M.J. Conditioning of generative adversarial networks for pore and reservoir scale models. In Proceedings of the 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11–14 June 2018; European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 2018, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  163. Mosser, L.; Dubrule, O.; Blunt, M.J. Stochastic seismic waveform inversion using generative adversarial networks as a geological prior. Math. Geosci. 2020, 52, 53–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. An, S.; Zhou, K.; Jinlin, W.; Zhang, N.; Liao, S.; Feng, Q.; Zhang, Z. Interpretation of high resolution aeromagnetic data for structures study and exploration of polymetallic deposits in Kalatage area, eastern Tianshan (NW China). Geosci. J. 2019, 24, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Peng, X.; Rao, X.; Zhao, H.; Xu, Y.; Zhong, X.; Zhan, W.; Huang, L. A proxy model to predict reservoir dynamic pressure profile of fracture network based on deep convolutional generative adversarial networks (DCGAN). J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 208, 109577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Niu, Y.; Wang, Y.D.; Mostaghimi, P.; Swietojanski, P.; Armstrong, R.T. An innovative application of generative adversarial networks for physically accurate rock images with an unprecedented field of view. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2020GL089029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chatterjee, S.; Byun, Y.C. A Synthetic Data Generation Technique for Enhancement of Prediction Accuracy of Electric Vehicles Demand. Sensors 2023, 23, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Hazra, D.; Shafqat, W.; Byun, Y.C. Generating Synthetic Data to Reduce Prediction Error of Energy Consumption. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 70, 3151–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yin, H.; Ou, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Xu, X.; Fan, J.; Meng, A. A novel asexual-reproduction evolutionary neural network for wind power prediction based on generative adversarial networks. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 247, 114714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Avila, A.; Lucu, M.; Garcia-Bediaga, A.; Ibarguren, U.; Gandiaga, I.; Rujas, A. Hybrid Energy Storage System Based on Li-Ion and Li-S Battery Modules and GAN-Based DC-DC Converter. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 132342–132353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Kousounadis-Knousen, M.A.; Bazionis, I.K.; Georgilaki, A.P.; Catthoor, F.; Georgilakis, P.S. A Review of Solar Power Scenario Generation Methods with Focus on Weather Classifications, Temporal Horizons, and Deep Generative Models. Energies 2023, 16, 5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Guibas, J.T.; Virdi, T.S.; Li, P.S. Synthetic medical images from dual generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1709.01872. [Google Scholar]
  173. Li, W.; Tang, Y.M.; Yu, K.M.; To, S. SLC-GAN: An automated myocardial infarction detection model based on generative adversarial networks and convolutional neural networks with single-lead electrocardiogram synthesis. Inf. Sci. 2022, 589, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Yang, G.; Yu, S.; Dong, H.; Slabaugh, G.; Dragotti, P.L.; Ye, X.; Liu, F.; Arridge, S.; Keegan, J.; Guo, Y.; et al. DAGAN: Deep de-aliasing generative adversarial networks for fast compressed sensing MRI reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2017, 37, 1310–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M.; Shao, C.; Shi, L.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, M.; Shan, F.; Liu, L. Combination of generative adversarial network and convolutional neural network for automatic subcentimeter pulmonary adenocarcinoma classification. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2020, 10, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Lin, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, S.; Qu, X. How generative adversarial networks promote the development of intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2023, 10, 1781–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Hussain, A.H.A.; Taher, M.A.; Mahmood, O.A.; Hammadi, Y.I.; Alkanhel, R.; Muthanna, A.; Koucheryavy, A. Urban Traffic Flow Estimation System Based on Gated Recurrent Unit Deep Learning Methodology for Internet of Vehicles. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 58516–58531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Sultana, R.; Ohashi, G. GAN-based Image Translation Model with Self-attention for Nighttime Dashcam Data Augmentation. IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. 2023, 106, 1202–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Li, W.; Guo, H.; Dong, H.; Tang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J. Bi-Level Implicit Semantic Data Augmentation for Vehicle Re-Identification. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 4364–4376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Li, C.; Zheng, L.; Jia, N. Network-wide ride-sourcing passenger demand origin-destination matrix prediction with a generative adversarial network. Transp. A Transp. Sci. 2022, 20, 2109774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Venketeswaran, A.; Lalam, N.; Wuenschell, J.; Ohodnicki Jr, P.R.; Badar, M.; Chen, K.P.; Lu, P.; Duan, Y.; Chorpening, B.; Buric, M. Recent advances in machine learning for fiber optic sensor applications. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2022, 4, 2100067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Pinto, L.; Davidson, J.; Sukthankar, R.; Gupta, A. Robust adversarial reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Sydney, Australia, 6–11 August 2017; pp. 2817–2826. [Google Scholar]
  183. Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Lu, Q.; Lin, Z.; Qin, N.; Shi, Q. FW-GAN: Underwater image enhancement using generative adversarial network with multi-scale fusion. Signal Process. Image Commun. 2022, 109, 116855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Chen, Y.; Jiang, J.; Lei, R.; Bekiroglu, Y.; Chen, F.; Li, M. GraspAda: Deep Grasp Adaptation through Domain Transfer. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), London, UK, 29 May – 2 June 2023; pp. 10268–10274. [Google Scholar]
  185. Chen, L.; Liu, X.; Ruan, W.; Lu, J. Enhance Robustness of Sequence Labelling with Masked Adversarial Training. 2020. Available online: https://www.amazon.science/publications/enhance-robustness-of-sequence-labelling-with-masked-adversarial-training (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  186. Langevin, A.; Cody, T.; Adams, S.; Beling, P. Generative adversarial networks for data augmentation and transfer in credit card fraud detection. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2022, 73, 153–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Deng, J.; Chen, C.; Huang, X.; Chen, W.; Cheng, L. Research on the construction of event logic knowledge graph of supply chain management. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2023, 56, 101921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Soleymani, F.; Paquet, E. Long-term financial predictions based on feynman–dirac path integrals, deep bayesian networks and temporal generative adversarial networks. Mach. Learn. Appl. 2022, 7, 100255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Kim, Y.; Kang, D.; Jeon, M.; Lee, C. GAN-MP hybrid heuristic algorithm for non-convex portfolio optimization problem. Eng. Econ. 2019, 64, 196–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Koshiyama, A.; Firoozye, N.; Treleaven, P. Generative adversarial networks for financial trading strategies fine-tuning and combination. Quant. Financ. 2021, 21, 797–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Cuchiero, C.; Khosrawi, W.; Teichmann, J. A Generative Adversarial Network Approach to Calibration of Local Stochastic Volatility Models. Risks 2020, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Wiese, M.; Knobloch, R.; Korn, R.; Kretschmer, P. Quant GANs: Deep generation of financial time series. Quant. Financ. 2020, 20, 1419–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ngwenduna, K.S.; Mbuvha, R. Alleviating Class Imbalance in Actuarial Applications Using Generative Adversarial Networks. Risks 2021, 9, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Guo, I.; Langrene, N.; Loeper, G.; Ning, W. Robust utility maximization under model uncertainty via a penalization approach. Math. Financ. Econ. 2022, 16, 51–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Tan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wang, S. DeepPricing: Pricing convertible bonds based on financial time-series generative adversarial networks. Financ. Innov. 2022, 8, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Flaig, S.; Junike, G. Scenario Generation for Market Risk Models Using Generative Neural Networks. Risks 2022, 10, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Han, F.; Ma, X.; Zhang, J. Simulating Multi-Asset Classes Prices Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network: A Study of Stocks, Futures and Cryptocurrency. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2022, 15, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Xu, G.; Dong, F.; Feng, J. Mapping the Technological Landscape of Emerging Industry Value Chain Through a Patent Lens: An Integrated Framework With Deep Learning. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2022, 69, 3367–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Golovianko, M.; Gryshko, S.; Terziyan, V.; Tuunanen, T. Responsible cognitive digital clones as decision-makers:a design science research study. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2022, 32, 879–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Lin, H.; Lin, J.; Wang, F. An innovative machine learning model for supply chain management. J. Innov. Knowl. 2022, 7, 100276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Sohn, K.; Sung, C.E.; Koo, G.; Kwon, O. Artificial intelligence in the fashion industry: Consumer responses to generative adversarial network (GAN) technology. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2021, 49, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Whittaker, L.; Letheren, K.; Mulcahy, R. The Rise of Deepfakes: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda for Marketing. Aust. Mark. J. 2021, 29, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Terzioglu, S.; Cogalmis, K.N.; Bulut, A. Ad creative generation using reinforced generative adversarial network. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Campbell, C.; Plangger, K.; Sands, S.; Kietzmann, J. Preparing for an Era of Deepfakes and AI-Generated Ads: A Framework for Understanding Responses to Manipulated Advertising. J. Advert. 2022, 51, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Campbell, C.; Plangger, K.; Sands, S.; Kietzmann, J.; Bates, K. How Deepfakes and Artificial Intelligence Could Reshape the Advertising Industry The Coming Reality of AI Fakes and Their Potential Impact on Consumer Behavior. J. Advert. Res. 2022, 62, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Anand, P.; Lee, C. Using Deep Learning to Overcome Privacy and Scalability Issues in Customer Data Transfer. Mark. Sci. 2022, 42, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Burnap, A.; Hauser, J.R.; Timoshenko, A. Product Aesthetic Design: A Machine Learning Augmentation. Mark. Sci. 2023, 42, 1029–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Han, Q.; Lucas, C.; Aguiar, E.; Macedo, P.; Wu, Z. Towards privacy-preserving digital marketing: An integrated framework for user modeling using deep learning on a data monetization platform. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 23, 1701–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Lin, Y.; Li, L.; Jing, H.; Ran, B.; Sun, D. Automated traffic incident detection with a smaller dataset based on generative adversarial networks. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 144, 105628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Li, L.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, H.; Tan, H.; Du, B.; Ran, B. Coupled application of generative adversarial networks and conventional neural networks for travel mode detection using GPS data. Transp. Res. Part A-Policy Pract. 2020, 136, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Basso, F.; Pezoa, R.; Varas, M.; Villalobos, M. A deep learning approach for real-time crash prediction using vehicle-by-vehicle data. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2021, 162, 106409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Man, C.K.; Quddus, M.; Theofilatos, A. Transfer learning for spatio-temporal transferability of real-time crash prediction models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2022, 165, 106511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Mauro, G.; Luca, M.; Longa, A.; Lepri, B.; Pappalardo, L. Generating mobility networks with generative adversarial networks. EPJ Data Sci. 2022, 11, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Yadav, P.; Menon, N.; Ravi, V.; Vishvanathan, S. Lung-GANs: Unsupervised Representation Learning for Lung Disease Classification Using Chest CT and X-ray Images. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2021, 70, 2774–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Wang, Z.; Akande, O.; Poulos, J.; Li, F. Are deep learning models superior for missing data imputation in surveys? Evidence from an empirical comparison. Surv. Methodol. 2022, 48, 375–399. [Google Scholar]
  216. Ebrahimi, M.; Chai, Y.; Samtani, S.; Chen, H. Cross-Lingual Cybersecurity Analytics in the International Dark Web with Adversarial Deep Representation Learning. Mis Q. 2022, 46, 1209–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Yu, S.; Chai, Y.; Samtani, S.; Liu, H.; Chen, H. Motion Sensor-Based Fall Prevention for Senior Care: A Hidden Markov Model with Generative Adversarial Network Approach. Inf. Syst. Res. 2023, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Leone, M. The Spiral of Digital Falsehood in Deepfakes. Int. J. Semiot. Law-Revue Int. Semiot. Jurid. 2023, 36, 385–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Jiang, C.; Lu, W.; Wang, Z.; Ding, Y. Benchmarking state-of-the-art imbalanced data learning approaches for credit scoring. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 213, 118878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Ma, D.; Yuan, D.; Huang, M.; Dong, L. VGC-GAN: A multi-graph convolution adversarial network for stock price prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 236, 121204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Gao, C.; Zhang, N.; Li, Y.; Lin, Y.; Wan, H. Adversarial self-attentive time-variant neural networks for multi-step time series forecasting. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 231, 120722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Aftabi, S.Z.; Ahmadi, A.; Farzi, S. Fraud detection in financial statements using data mining and GAN models. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 227, 120144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Kang, Y.; Chen, L.; Jia, N.; Wei, W.; Deng, J.; Qian, H. A CWGAN-GP-based multi-task learning model for consumer credit scoring. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 206, 117650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Wei, S.; Zhou, X.; An, X.; Yang, X.; Xiao, Y. A heterogeneous E-commerce user alignment model based on data enhancement and data representation. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 228, 120258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Fiore, U.; De Santis, A.; Perla, F.; Zanetti, P.; Palmieri, F. Using generative adversarial networks for improving classification effectiveness in credit card fraud detection. Inf. Sci. 2019, 479, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of a generative adversarial network model [13].
Figure 1. Structure of a generative adversarial network model [13].
Applsci 14 07438 g001
Figure 2. Number of articles published per year.
Figure 2. Number of articles published per year.
Applsci 14 07438 g002
Table 1. Frequency per type of document.
Table 1. Frequency per type of document.
Document Type#    Document Type#  Document Type#
Articles11,168Meeting Abstracts131Letters5
Proceedings7027Editorial Materials21Retracted Publications3
Early Access503Corrections17Data Papers2
Review Articles335Book Chapters12
Table 2. Publications per country.
Table 2. Publications per country.
Country#     %     Country#     %     
China9123 48.998 USA3837 20.608
South Korea1165 6.259 England958 5.145
India920 4.941 Japan835 4.485
Germany704 3.781 Australia670 3.563
Canada630 3.384 Taiwan415 2.229
France398 2.138 Singapore369 1.982
Italy350 1.880 Spain296 1.570
Switzerland251 1.348 Saudi Arabia203 1.090
Others (103 countries)3267 17.546
Table 3. Publications according to research areas.
Table 3. Publications according to research areas.
Research Area#   %   
Computer Science10,974 58.940
Engineering8418 45.212
Imaging Science/Photographic Technology2368 12.718
Telecommunications1983 10.650
Radiology/Nuclear Medicine/Medical Imaging1182 6.348
Remote Sensing897 4.818
Optics868 4.662
Physics854 4.587
Chemistry667 3.582
Instruments/Instrumentation674 3.620
Automation/Control Systems631 3.389
Materials Science507 2.723
Geology444 2.385
Mathematics404 2.170
Science/Technology/Other Topics404 2.170
Mathematical/Computational Biology389 2.089
Environmental Sciences/Ecology361 1.939
Acoustics351 1.885
Neurosciences/Neurology329 1.767
Geochemistry/Geophysics336 1.805
Robotics283 1.520
Medical Informatics245 1.316
Transportation235 1.262
Energy Fuels212 1.139
Operations Research/Management Science189 1.015
Others (90 areas)2283 12.261
Table 4. WOS publications on Financial Economics.
Table 4. WOS publications on Financial Economics.
YearTitleAuthors
2019GAN-MP hybrid heuristic algorithm for non-convex portfolio optimization problem.Kim, Y., Kang, D., Jeon, M., and Lee, C. [189]
2020Generative adversarial networks for financial trading strategies fine-tuning and combination.Koshiyama, A., Firoozye, N., and Treleaven, P. [190]
2020A generative adversarial network approach to calibration of local stochastic volatility models.Cuchiero, C., Khosrawi, W., and Teichmann, J.  [191]
2020Quant GANs: deep generation of financial time series.Wiese, M., Knobloch, R., Korn, R., and Kretschmer, P. [192]
2021Alleviating class imbalance in actuarial applications using generative adversarial networks.Ngwenduna, K. S., and Mbuvha, R.  [193]
2022Robust utility maximization under model uncertainty via a penalization approach.Guo, I., Langrene, N., Loeper, G., and Ning, W.  [194]
2022DeepPricing: pricing convertible bonds based on financial time-series generative adversarial networks.Tan, X., Zhang, Z., Zhao, X., and Wang, S.  [195]
2022Scenario generation for market risk models using generative neural networks.Flaig, S., and Junike, G.  [196]
2022Simulating multi-asset classes prices using Wasserstein generative adversarial network: A study of stocks, futures and cryptocurrency.Han, F., Ma, X., and Zhang, J.  [197]
Table 5. WOS publications in Management.
Table 5. WOS publications in Management.
YearTitleAuthors
2022Generative adversarial networks for data augmentation and transfer in credit card fraud detection.Langevin, A., Cody, T., Adams, S., and Beling, P. [186]
2022Mapping the technological landscape of emerging industry value chain through a patent lens: An integrated framework with deep learning.Xu, G., Dong, F., and Feng, J. [198]
2022Responsible cognitive digital clones as decision-makers: a design science research study.Golovianko, M., Gryshko, S., Terziyan, V., and Tuunanen, T. [199]
2022An innovative machine learning model for supply chain management.Lin, H., Lin, J., and Wang, F. [200]
Table 6. WOS publications on Marketing and Publicity.
Table 6. WOS publications on Marketing and Publicity.
YearTitleAuthors
2021Artificial intelligence in the fashion industry: consumer responses to generative adversarial network (GAN) technology.Sohn, K., Sung, C. E., Koo, G., and Kwon, O. [201]
2021The rise of deepfakes: A conceptual framework and research agenda for marketing.Whittaker, L., Letheren, K., and Mulcahy, R. [202]
2022Ad creative generation using reinforced generative adversarial network.Terzioglu, S., Cogalmis, K. N., and Bulut, A. [203]
2022Preparing for an era of deepfakes and AI-generated ads: A framework for understanding responses to manipulated advertising.Campbell, C., Plangger, K., Sands, S., and Kietzmann, J. [204]
2022How deepfakes and artificial intelligence could reshape the advertising industry: The coming reality of AI fakes and their potential impact on consumer behavior.Campbell, C., Plangger, K., Sands, S., Kietzmann, J., and Bates, K. [205]
2022Using deep learning to overcome privacy and scalability issues in customer data transfer.Anand, P., and Lee, C. [206]
2023Product aesthetic design: A machine learning augmentation.Burnap, A., Hauser, J. R., and Timoshenko, A. [207]
2023Towards privacy-preserving digital marketing: an integrated framework for user modeling using deep learning on a data monetization platform.Han, Q., Lucas, C., Aguiar, E., Macedo, P., and Wu, Z.  [208]
Table 7. WOS publications on Logistic Transport.
Table 7. WOS publications on Logistic Transport.
YearTitleAuthors
2020Automated traffic incident detection with a smaller dataset based on generative adversarial networks.Lin, Y., Li, L., Jing, H., Ran, B., and Sun, D. [209]
2020Coupled application of generative adversarial networks and conventional neural networks for travel mode detection using GPS data.Li, L., Zhu, J., Zhang, H., Tan, H., Du, B., and Ran, B. [210]
2021A deep learning approach for real-time crash prediction using vehicle-by-vehicle data.Basso, F., Pezoa, R., Varas, M., and Villalobos, M. [211]
2022Transfer learning for spatio-temporal transferability of real-time crash prediction models.Man, C. K., Quddus, M., and Theofilatos, A.  [212]
2022Generating mobility networks with generative adversarial networks.Mauro, G., Luca, M., Longa, A., Lepri, B., and Pappalardo, L. [213]
Table 8. WOS publications classified as “Others”.
Table 8. WOS publications classified as “Others”.
YearTitleAuthors
2021Lung-GAN: Unsupervised representation learning for lung disease classification using chest CT and X-ray images.Yadav, P., Menon, N., Ravi, V., and Vishvanathan, S. [214]
2022Are deep learning models superior for missing data imputation in large surveys? Evidence from an empirical comparison.Wang, Z., Akande, O., Poulos, J., and Li, F.  [215]
2022Cross-lingual cybersecurity analytics in the international dark web with adversarial deep representation learning.Ebrahimi, M., Chai, Y., Samtani, S., and Chen, H. [216]
2023Motion Sensor-based fall prevention for senior care: A hidden Markov model with generative adversarial network approach.Yu, S., Chai, Y., Samtani, S., Liu, H., and Chen, H. [217]
2023The spiral of digital falsehood in deepfakes.Leone, M. [218]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz-Gándara, A.; Gonzalez-Abril, L. Generative Adversarial Networks in Business and Social Science. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 7438. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177438

AMA Style

Ruiz-Gándara A, Gonzalez-Abril L. Generative Adversarial Networks in Business and Social Science. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(17):7438. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177438

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz-Gándara, Africa, and Luis Gonzalez-Abril. 2024. "Generative Adversarial Networks in Business and Social Science" Applied Sciences 14, no. 17: 7438. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177438

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop