1. Introduction
The increasing amount of industrial solid waste produced by developed countries is a serious environmental problem. Hazardous wastes, including hydrocarbons, plastics, painted wood, paper, cartons, PET bottles, food remnants, and pesticides, are removed by their thermal degradation. Industrial solid waste is fed into a rotary kiln, where it is burned after minimal pre-treatment (only the largest non-flammable waste pieces are removed). A difference should be distinguished between municipal waste incineration plants, which operate practically continuously, and hazardous waste incineration plants, which operate discontinuously. In both types of waste incinerators, combustion products are usually very aggressive and lead to the degradation of exhaust-cleaning devices. When an electrostatic precipitator is used to remove particles from exhaust gasses, the corrosion and/or erosion of the electrodes is a significant problem. These processes result in rapid loss of electrode material, thereby reducing the collection efficiency of this type of device.
The problem of corrosion–erosion processes occurs in many devices in which a working medium, gas, or liquid conveying small solid particles flows at a high velocity. Devices operating in the process of thermal degradation of industrial waste are particularly exposed to corrosion and erosion. In the case of thermal power plants, the problem of erosion–corrosion occurs in electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), in which the flue gas contains dust particles. The erosion damage of metal structures caused by an impact of solid particles has been discussed, for example, by Malcher [
1]. In the case of electrostatic precipitators, the consequence of the erosion process is the serious degradation of electrodes and insulators, which results in a decrease in the collection efficiency [
2] and the premature failure of structural parts, causing the generation of additional costs associated with the need for their replacement.
The production of industrial solid waste has increased significantly over the past 60 years. In 1960, approximately 88 million tons of industrial waste was produced in the United States, and by 2018, this figure increased more than three times, to 292 million tons [
3]. In particular, due to population growth and urbanization in developing countries, the generation of municipal and industrial solid wastes has also increased significantly over the past decades and is expected to be doubled by 2025 compared to 2012 [
3]. The incineration of industrial solid waste is widely used to solve the problem of the large volume of waste that modern society produces [
4]. The thermal treatment of wastes is the most frequently used method of waste disposal, but these processes are not fully acceptable under current international environmental policy, which prefers the efficient recovery of raw materials and energy. Incineration plants have many advantages over other waste-disposal methods, such as reduced volume and weight after the incineration of waste and the biological detoxification of ash. However, the flue gas contains high concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [
5] and fly ash with heavy metals [
6]. The thermal decomposition of industrial wastes requires cleaning the exhaust gasses of toxic products, which are released into the atmosphere and can influence human health [
7,
8].
Fly ash also contains a large number of compounds, including carbon as soot particles, dioxins, furans [
9], and compounds of toxic metals: arsenic, cadmium [
10], chromium, nickel, and mercury bichloride [
11]. Within the techniques of cleaning gasses from industrial waste incinerators, electrostatic precipitators and fabric filters meet the exhaust gas-treatment standards [
12].
In the process of waste incineration, not only solid particles but also noxious and corrosive gasses are produced. In the process of waste combustion, most of the sulfur contained in the fuel is transferred (in an oxidizing atmosphere) to sulfur oxides [
13]. Sulfur dioxide already in the furnace turns into sulfur trioxide. Also, during an electric discharge in an electrostatic precipitator, compounds such as nitrogen or sulfur oxides (NO
x and SO
x) are produced due to the presence of fast electrons, forming free radicals in collisions with gaseous molecules. The harmfulness of SO
3 lies in the fact that it condenses on the surface of the devices after reaction with water in the form of sulfuric acid, which creates strong metal corrosion. Due to the low velocity of solid particles in the exhaust gas stream (about 1 m/s) and their low kinetic energy, the erosion process is less important, although a long time of impact of solid particles of different morphologies onto the discharge electrodes of electrostatic precipitator can also locally erode or deform its surface, which leads to electrode failure and electrostatic precipitator accidents.
In practice, after such an accident, due to the lack of knowledge of the chemical composition of flue gasses and properties of conveyed fly ash particles, which were precipitated earlier, it is not easy to distinguish between these two processes during actual electrostatic precipitator operation. Only the results of the degradation can be assessed by experts after years of ESP operation.
The problem of electrode material degradation in electrostatic precipitators has not been sufficiently thoroughly studied in the literature. There are only a few papers on this subject referring to dry ESPs, particularly those operating in harsh conditions of waste incinerators. The degradation of electrodes in the electrostatic precipitator reduces the performance of the electrostatic precipitator, mainly its collection efficiency, which results in increased particulate matter emission released into the atmosphere. The production of electrodes from the high-corrosion- and erosion-resistant materials can increase the lifetime of these electrodes and reduce the costs of electrodes replacement but increases the investment costs. Three types of solutions can be met in scientific and engineering papers, which are used to increase the lifetime of discharge electrodes: (1) the coating of the discharge electrode with an acid-resistant layer, (2) using the composite discharge electrodes, and (3) the construction of two-stage electrostatic precipitators, with the charging stage equipped with an ion injector instead of a conventional discharge electrode.
The electrodes with acid-resistant coating were constructed and investigated by Machnik and Nocuń [
14]. The authors used a mast electrode with blade emission elements, and a cylindrical smooth rod electrode, both with and without an anti-corrosion coating. Tests were conducted by the authors in order to assess the performances of three anti-corrosion agents: (1) “Unikor C” with an iron (III) oxide filler, (2) a water-soluble acrylic resin polydispersion, with an organic filler, and (3) a polyurethane varnish without a filler. The thickness of these coatings was between 50 and 65 μm. The measurements were carried out in the ambient air, at a pressure of 987.9 hPa, a temperature of 22 °C, and relative humidity of 53%. The authors measured the discharge current, the corona onset voltage, and the current density distribution on the collection electrode, for all the discharge electrodes tested. Their findings indicated that the anti-corrosion coating does not significantly affect these electrodes’ parameters. The addition of Fe
2O
3 (15 wt.%) to the coating resulted in an increase in the discharge current of the electrodes with blades.
Ali et al. [
15] developed a novel hybrid composite discharge electrode made of carbon fiber composite combined with metal mesh, which exhibited corrosion resistance and lightweight properties. This type of electrode could potentially be used in a wet electrostatic precipitator as a superior alternative to traditional metal electrodes. The hybrid composite discharge electrode exhibited a lower corona onset voltage than conventional metal electrodes, and the corona discharge was more uniform at comparable power levels.
A two-stage electrostatic precipitator, designed for the removal of particles and acidic droplets (for example, HF, HCl, HNO
3, and H
2SO
4) from corrosive gasses, discharged from the wet-etching technologies in semiconductor and optoelectronic industries, and from explosive gasses, as developed by Kim et al. [
16]. The precharger stage consisted of ion injectors with clean air sheath, placed outside the main gas flow, and constructed from carbon brush. The carbon electrodes were more resistant to the corrosive atmosphere than those made of metal. The collection efficiency for PM2.5 particles, achieved by this device, was between 89.5% and 99.5%, depending on the brush electrode depth, by a voltage applied to the carbon brush emission electrodes of −23 kV, and the exhaust gas flow rate of 600 L/min.
Hall and Katz [
17] considered the problem of mechanisms of the corrosion of electrodes in electrostatic precipitators. The authors identified the following types of corrosion specific to electrostatic precipitators, from which the most important are the following:
Uniform attack—this appears in the case the electrode has a direct contact with acids, caustics, or other corrosive liquids separated from the gas on a large surface of the electrode. The most susceptible to these attacks are collection plates, gas distribution baffles, hoppers, shells, roof, and isolator supports, and particularly the surfaces, which are locally cooled due to imperfect thermal isolation.
Pitting—this is an intense deep corrosion in small areas (points), particularly in the breakdowns of protective coating. The most vulnerable to this type of corrosion are discharge electrodes and rappers, and places through which cold air is drawn in.
Stress corrosion—this occurs in places loaded with high tensile stress in the presence of corrosive atmosphere. The discharge electrode frames are susceptible at their bents to this type of corrosion due to microcells formed in the material in the fabrication process.
Crevices corrosion—this is a type of corrosion occurring in tight gaps between two different parts in contact, for example, under gaskets, seals, washers, and screws, or inside cracks and seams. This type of corrosion may occur in all connections of different parts in an electrostatic precipitator.
Intergranular corrosion—this appears along material grain boundaries, particularly those formed due to material stress during cooling after welding. This type of corrosion may occur in the shells and roof, as well as in collection or discharge electrodes.
Fatigue corrosion—this results from a cyclic load or stress in a corrosive atmosphere. This fatigue leads to the formation of micro or macro cracks. The rappers, rapper anvils, particularly in welded areas, or hangers of collection plates are loaded by excessive vibration during rapping or the discharge electrodes.
Impingement attack—in the case of electrostatic precipitators, this is a process of scouring the metal surfaces exposed to the flowing abrasive media, leading to its erosion or surface attack through the scale, which are the corrosive products.
Fretting corrosion—this is the high frequency vibration of the collection and discharge electrodes during their rapping, which leads to metal fit erosion as an effect of friction.
Galvanic action—this corrosion occurs in a junction between two metals of different electrochemical potentials in the galvanic series. This localized metal erosion occurs particularly in the connections of discharge electrodes to a high voltage source.
In many practical cases all the mentioned mechanisms operate simultaneously, providing a synergistic effect in the electrode’s failure, and the final electrode degradation reasons are difficult to distinguish. Regarding the collection electrodes, the most susceptible to corrosion are plates adjacent to the chamber outer walls or hoppers, where the gas temperature can drop below the dew point for acid condensation [
17]. The upper parts of the collection and discharge electrodes can be exposed to the infiltration of cold air through the supporting insulators. Electrodes can also be eroded by excessive electrical breakdowns or electrical coronas due to the misalignment of the electrodes, sharp edges remaining after their fabrication, or thermal bending [
17].
The erosion of metal surfaces caused by bombardment by a stream of solid particles conveyed by the flowing gas was investigated numerically by Malcher [
1]. The collision of such particles with the metal surface can remove microscopic fragments of material from the surface. In the case of electrostatic precipitators, the most heavily loaded areas are the duct sidewalls, vanes, and baffles, where the gas velocity is of several m/s. The author assumed that a solid particle approaches the metal surface at an impingement angle,
γ (the angle between the surface and incident trajectory), with velocity
Vp. It was also assumed that the particle is much harder than the metal surface, the particle does not break up after collision, and the metal surface deforms plastically. The model of erosion was based on that provided by Finnie [
18], which is valid for ductile materials:
where
E is the volume of material removed by a single abrasive particle,
k is a constant depending on the hardness of eroding metal and the mass of the particle,
Vp is the velocity of the impinging particle,
n is the coefficient determined experimentally,
γ is the impingement angle, and
f is the dimensionless wear function, depending on the impingement angle
γ.
The objective of this article was to investigate the mechanisms of discharge electrode degradation in an industrial electrostatic precipitator operating downstream of an industrial waste incinerator. The analysis discusses the most plausible mechanisms leading to the observed degradation results. These mechanisms have been reconstructed ex-post, because the operating conditions of the incinerator, the chemical composition of exhaust gasses, and the PM content are not known and can largely vary in real exploitation conditions. To this end, the traces of elements remaining in the electrode material were analyzed as potential markers of the corrosion process.
The main goal of this article was to address the main mechanisms of the discharge electrodes’ degradation in an electrostatic precipitator operating under harsh conditions of an industrial waste incinerator, which are significantly different from those characteristic of coal-fired power plant boilers.
This paper presents novel insights into the potential mechanisms of electrode degradation under real-world, harsh operational conditions. The provided information will assist in selecting appropriate electrode material and/or implementing protection against the action of various factors, in order to extend the maintenance period.
4. Discussion
The investigation of discharge electrode degradation in an electrostatic precipitator was carried out. Given the lack of knowledge regarding the chemical composition and PM content of the exhaust gasses from an industrial waste incinerator, which can vary significantly, the physical and chemical causes of electrode degradation can be reconstructed ex-post and deduced from the traces of elements remaining at the electrode material only, or via a comparison of the effects of similar phenomena observed in laboratory experiments.
In the literature, only the problems of corrosion affecting boilers and heat exchangers, or exhaust pipes, are usually discussed. In these cases, the discussed processes involve high-temperature corrosion (from the boiler side) [
31,
32] or low-temperature corrosion (from the gas outlet side) [
33,
34]. In coal-fired boilers, the gas composition may vary slightly, but in the case of waste incineration plants, the flue gas composition may change depending on the type of waste being burned.
In the case of industrial waste incineration plants, the fuel components may include oil sludge, electronic parts, rubber, soil contaminated with pesticides, etc. Given the diverse nature of these components, it is challenging to ascertain the precise mechanisms, through which the electrostatic precipitator corrosion processes may occur.
There is an ongoing discussion in the literature regarding the possible mechanisms of corrosion and the influence of individual components in the flue gas on this process [
31]. A review of the literature reveals the absence of information about the course of corrosion in exhaust gas treatment systems, where the temperature should be above the acid dew point.
In a solid waste incinerator, in which municipal wastes are used as a fuel, the corrosion of steel by chlorine and chlorides plays the main role. The corrosion process due to the reaction of chlorides with oxides from the protective layer of the electrodes occurs as follows:
And the effect of chlorine (formed through the oxidation of HCl) [
35] occurs as follows:
Due to relatively high vapor pressure at high gas temperatures, a continuous evaporation of FeCl
2 takes place, and metal chlorides diffuse outward from the scales. At the temperature of the flue gas in the electrostatic precipitator, this reaction could be negligible. The FeCl
2 reacts with O
2, resulting in Fe
2O
3 formation with Cl
2 gas emission:
For this reason, chlorine has not been detected in the corrosion layer with the EDS method.
In another way, the corrosion caused by SO
2 occurs at low temperatures of exhaust gasses. EDS and RDX analyses indicated that the sulfur phases occur on the discharge electrodes. General sulfur corrosion reactions could occur, forming metal salts [
26].
Most corrosion processes involving water and aqueous solutions, called electrochemical corrosion, which might occur after water or acid condensation onto the electrodes, can be explained by the formation of corrosion microcells onto the surface. Local damage can lead to the perforation of the metal parts [
36].
If a metal material is exposed to an environment with oxidizing properties at elevated temperatures, the reaction products are formed and form solid products called scales (cf.
Figure 12), mainly on the surface of the material. The scale formed on the surface of the metal phase is dense, i.e., free from discontinuities and demonstrating sufficient adhesion to the substrate, thereby preventing the periodic detachment of the scale from the metal surface.
Corrosion is one of the inevitable problems of structural steel exposed to long-term exposure to waste gasses from the incineration of industrial waste. Corrosion is characterized by a uniform loss of the material of the surface layer.
Corrosion cracking can only occur when a corrosive environment combines with stresses and tensile forces (stress corrosion) [
17]. In
Figure 8, an area of a crack with a white circle is indicated. This crack is probably a result of stresses inside the material. Corrosion cracks can occur both along grain boundaries (in the case of lower stresses) and within the material’s components (intracrystalline). Several typical stress corrosion cracks in the investigated electrode material are shown in
Figure 12. The adsorption of sulfur compounds may occur in these cracks, resulting in their systematic widening (
Figure 9).
Crack initiation occurs in brittle surface layers and is followed by a gradual expansion of these cracks into the inner zone of the metal. The cracking process is influenced by microstresses, which may result from temperature gradient or structural heterogeneity of the material. Often, in non-austenitic chromium–nickel steel material, the stress corrosion cracking results in the formation of groups of adjacent cracks. At the beginning of crack development, some dislocations and microdeformations can emerge at the surface (cf.
Figure 8). The primary factor for crack development is the accelerated penetration of the corrosion environment into the crack crevices. Stress corrosion cracking can occur under the simultaneous action of a corrosive environment and tensile stresses. The microstresses and structural heterogeneity of the material distort the course of cracking.
The development of pitting corrosion occurs by increasing the pitting formed in the nucleation process and creating new corrosion zones. In the process of pitting corrosion, three stages can be distinguished: the nucleation of pits on the metal surface, the development of pits, and finally, the perforation element (open pits).
The shape and size of the pits as well as volume of removed material change depending on the corrosive conditions. The quantity of material lost at the pitting site is a function of the acidic components and the moisture content [
37]. The author of [
37] reviewed the critical factors, which influence the pitting corrosion. The factors discussed include temperature, pressure, and surface roughness. The result of the corrosive environment is the formation of open pits, as illustrated in
Figure 13. This mechanism suggests that the areas completely devoid of metal in this electrode are caused by acid gasses produced by waste incineration. The removed material accumulates at the edges of the pit in the form of scale or is removed with the flowing gas in the electrostatic precipitator.
Two- or multi-layer scales are formed on the surfaces of metals and alloys, where at least one of the layers, usually the innermost, is compact. The scales formed may be either single-phase or multi-phase, and they are compact throughout their cross-section, closely adhering to the substrate [
36]. The scale is filled with fly ash particles, which absorbed Hg, As, and Cu compounds, as suggested by EDS measurement (
Figure 14). A XRD diffractogram of the phase composition of scales on the electrode is shown in
Figure 15.
Figure 16 shows that either sulfides or oxides are formed as an effect of corrosion, and these compounds are the most abundant in the scales.
Scale formation is also a common phenomenon observed in exhaust gasses. As a result of fly ash deposition on the discharge electrode, the sulfur reacts with the electrode material via “migrating” to the structure of the material.
Figure 16 illustrates changes in the concentration of sulfur, phosphorus, iron, and chromium in different areas of the discharge electrode: in the fly ash deposited on the discharge electrode, clean metal electrode surface, degraded electrode material, and the scale. From this diagram, it is possible to estimate the migration of sulfur and phosphorus compounds (from exhaust gasses to scale) during the operation of the electrostatic precipitator. The sulfur compounds present in exhaust gasses penetrate both the created gaps in the electrode material, and are the main components of the scale.
The electric discharge plasma column that forms between the electrodes is a phenomenon that frequently occurs in electrostatic precipitators during back-corona discharge. This phenomenon can also cause material evaporation at a spot, resulting in the formation of small pits on the surface. The plasma column can be concentrated at a very small hot spot on the cathode, which causes the sputtering of the cathode material into the plasma region due to positive ion bombardment. Such an effect has been observed in many laboratory experiments. Another phenomenon occurs at the sharp edges of the discharge electrode, where the current density is particularly high, even at relatively small discharge currents, which was observed in other experiments [
23,
24]. The spot formed due to ion bombardment is difficult to distinguish from that due to electrochemical processes. In fact, both phenomena may occur simultaneously during an electrostatic precipitator operation.