Next Article in Journal
Environmental Pollution and Oxidative Stress: Health Effects During Pregnancy: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation on Rock Failure Characteristics of Large-Span Goafs Using Digital Image Correlation Analysis and Acoustic Emission Monitoring
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Study on the Surrogate-Based Optimization of Flexible Wings Considering a Flutter Constraint
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparative Analysis of Active Control vs. Folding Wing Tip Technologies for Gust Load Alleviation

by
Francesco Toffol
Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(21), 9883; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219883
Submission received: 26 September 2024 / Revised: 21 October 2024 / Accepted: 23 October 2024 / Published: 29 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity)

Abstract

As part of the Ultra High Aspect Ratio Wing Advanced Research and Designs (U-HARWARD) project, funded by CS2JU, various gust load alleviation (GLA) technologies have been developed and studied. GLA plays a crucial role in the development of new generation ultra-high aspect ratio wings (UHARWs), as it reduces gust loads, thereby decreasing the structural weight of the wing and, consequently, the entire aircraft. This weight reduction enhances overall aircraft efficiency, enabling a higher aspect ratio. GLA technologies are categorized into passive systems, which require no active intervention, and active systems, where control surfaces redistribute the aerodynamic loads. In this study, passive GLA was implemented using a folding wing tip (FWT) developed by the University of Bristol, while active GLA employed a Static Output Feedback controller developed by Politecnico di Milano. Both approaches were compared against a baseline aircraft configuration. A flutter assessment confirmed that FWT does not introduce aeroelastic instabilities, ensuring the aircraft remains flutter-free across its flight envelope. A thorough comparison of load envelopes, based on nearly 2000 load cases across different flight points and mass configurations, was conducted in compliance with CS25 regulations, examining both positive and negative gust conditions. The results show a possible 15% reduction in the dynamic load envelope for both passive and active solutions. Using NeOPT, a hybrid finite element (FE) model was developed, with a detailed global FEM (GFEM) for the wingbox and stick elements for other components. Linear gust analyses in Nastran, with the hinge locked and released, provided high-fidelity results, comparing wing failure indexes and demonstrating the effectiveness of the FWT solution.
Keywords: high aspect ratio wings; load alleviation; folding wing tip high aspect ratio wings; load alleviation; folding wing tip

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Toffol, F. A Comparative Analysis of Active Control vs. Folding Wing Tip Technologies for Gust Load Alleviation. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219883

AMA Style

Toffol F. A Comparative Analysis of Active Control vs. Folding Wing Tip Technologies for Gust Load Alleviation. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(21):9883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219883

Chicago/Turabian Style

Toffol, Francesco. 2024. "A Comparative Analysis of Active Control vs. Folding Wing Tip Technologies for Gust Load Alleviation" Applied Sciences 14, no. 21: 9883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219883

APA Style

Toffol, F. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of Active Control vs. Folding Wing Tip Technologies for Gust Load Alleviation. Applied Sciences, 14(21), 9883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219883

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop