Next Article in Journal
Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Optimization Method Based on Object Detection in Dynamic Scene
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Dispersion Stability and Polishing Performance of Polishing Solution Based on Micro-Abrasive Water Jet Polishing
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study of Deformation and Fault Mechanisms in Bedding-Locked Rock Slope

Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 1786; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051786
by Xiaodong Han, Jinyu Dong *, Xinglong Yang and Huimin Guo
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 1786; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051786
Submission received: 8 January 2024 / Revised: 12 February 2024 / Accepted: 20 February 2024 / Published: 22 February 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

 

The paper entitled ‘Study on deformation and fault mechanisms of bedding locked rock slope’ focuses on the study of a typical bedding locked rock slope in China. 

The main drawback of the paper is the legibility. It is quite complicated to understand and follow the manuscript. This is mainly due to the poor quality of the English level and the several grammatical and typographical errors. There are some long sentences, which make it even more complicated to follow. Therefore, it is suggested to be reviewed by an English native speaker. 

 

The second main drawback of the paper is the abstract. It is not very clear what is the goal or the method followed. There is a lot of information that do not help the reader to understand it. It is suggested to be revised and re-written following this structure: introduction to the problem or state of the art, solution or objectives, method, results and some main conclusions.  

The third main drawback of the paper is the length. Figures could be added in a single row.  

Most of the plots are blurry. It is suggested to redo them.

The numerical model is not clear. How was it developed? And the analyses? Boundary conditions? There is no proper description. 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English should be revised. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In the abstract, I suggest to the author to precise the main result;

authors must choose a uniform style for calling up references in the text

authors should give some ideas for futur research

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

moderate editing for english language

Author Response

Dear reviewer, Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors.

Kindly revise the manuscript in light of the comments marked on the attached draft.

Bets of luck! 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor English corrections are required.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop