Evaluation of Saponin Extract from Vitex doniana and Pentaclethra macrophylla for Antibacterial Activity
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials
2.2. Maceration and Extraction of Plant Materials
2.3. Phytochemical Assay
2.4. Saponin Extraction
2.5. Test Bacteria
2.6. Antibacterial Assay
2.7. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Determination
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nyiligira, E.; Viljoen, A.M.; van Heerden, F.R.; van Zyl, R.L.; Van Vuuren, S.F.; Steenkamp, P.A. Phytochemistry and in vitro pharmacological activities of South African Vitex (Verbenaceae) species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nwodo, U.U.; Ngene, A.A.; Iroegbu, C.U.; Onyedikachi, O.A.L.; Chigor, V.N.; Okoh, A.I. In vivo evaluation of the antiviral activity of Cajanus cajan on measles virus. Arch. Virol. 2011, 156, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nwodo, U.U.; Ngene, A.A.; Iroegbu, C.U.; Obiiyeke, G.E. Effects of fractionation on antibacterial activity of crude extracts of Tamarindus indica. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 7108–7113. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, K.W.; Iqbal, S.; Khong, N.M.H.; Ooi, D.J.; Ismail, M. Antioxidant activity of phenolics-saponins rich fraction prepared from defatted kenaf seed meal. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 56, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Nie, R.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, C.; Xiong, Z. The effects of total soy saponins on free radicals in the quadriceps femoris, serum testosterone, LDH, and BUN of exhausted rats. J. Sport Health Sci. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fouedjou, R.T.; Teponno, R.B.; Quassinti, L.; Bramucci, M.; Petrelli, D.; Vitali, L.A.; Fiorini, D.; Tapondjou, L.A.; Barboni, L. Steroidal saponins from the leaves of Cordyline fruticosa (L.) A. Chev. and their cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 7, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cousins, D.; Huffman, M.A. Medicinal properties in the diet of gorillas: An ethno-pharmacological evaluation. Afr. Study Monogr. 2002, 23, 65–89. [Google Scholar]
- Ekeanyanwu, C.R. Traditional medicine in Nigeria: Current status and the future. Res. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 5, 90–94. [Google Scholar]
- Ouattara, A.; Coulibaly, A.; Adima, A.A.; Ouattara, K.; Ouattara, K. Exploration of the antistaphylococcic activity of Vitex doniana (Verbenaceae) stem bark extracts. Sch. Acad. J. Pharm. 2013, 2, 94–100. [Google Scholar]
- Cimanga, K.R.; Kikweta, M.C.; Tshodi, E.M.; Nsaka, L.S.; Mbamu, M.B.; Manienga, K.; Bumoyi, M.; Kambu, K.O. Antibacterial and antifungal screening of extracts from six medicinal plants collected in Kinshasa-Democratic Republic of Congo against clinical isolate pathogens. J. Pharmacogn. Phytother. 2014, 6, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enujiugha, V.N. Nutrient changes during the fermentation of African oil bean (Pentaclethra macrophylla benth) seeds. Pak. J. Nutr. 2003, 2, 320–323. [Google Scholar]
- Agbogidi, O. Response of African oil bean (Pentaclethra Macrophylla benth) seeds to soils contaminated with spent lubricating oil. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 4, 492–494. [Google Scholar]
- Agbede, J.; Ibitoye, A. Chemical composition of black plum (Vitex doniana): An under-utilized fruit. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2007, 5, 95–96. [Google Scholar]
- Muhammad, M.B.; Binta, B.; Hamidu, M.R.; Paul, N. Antimicrobial activity of the leaves and stem bark of Vitex doniana. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Osum, F.I.; Okonkwo, T.M.; Okafor, G.I. Effect of processing methods on the chemical composition of Vitex doniana leaf and leaf products. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 1, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilani, A. Antibacterial assessment of whole stem bark of Vitex doniana against some enterobactriaceae. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 958–959. [Google Scholar]
- Lagnika, L.; Amoussa, M.; Adjovi, Y.; Sanni, A. Antifungal, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of Adansonia digitata and Vitex doniana from Bénin pharmacopeia. J. Pharmacogn. Phytother. 2012, 4, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okunrobo, L.; Ching, F.; Ifijeh, F. Antinociceptive activity of methanol extract and aqueous fraction of the stem bark of Pentaclethra macrophylla benth (mimosaceae). J. Med. Plants Res. 2009, 3, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
- Okorie, C.; Oparaocha, E.; Adewunmi, C.O.; Iwalewa, E.; Omodara, S. Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of Pentaclethra macrophylla aqueous extracts in mice. Afr. J. Trad. CAM 2006, 2, 44–53. [Google Scholar]
- Mir, M.A.; Sawhney, S.S.; Jassal, M.M.S. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of phytochemicals of Taraxacum officinale. Wudpecker J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Majinda, R.R. Extraction and isolation of saponins. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 864, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Soetan, K.; Oyekunle, M.; Aiyelaagbe, O.; Fafunso, M. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of saponins extract of Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 2405–2407. [Google Scholar]
- Vincken, J.P.; Heng, L.; de Groot, A.; Gruppen, H. Saponins, classification and occurrence in the plant kingdom. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sparg, S.; Light, M.; van Staden, J. Biological activities and distribution of plant saponins. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 94, 219–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trease, G.E.; Evans, W.C. Phytochemistry: Introduction and general methods. In Pharmacognosy, 11th ed.; Bailliere Tindall: London, UK, 1978; pp. 227–247. [Google Scholar]
- Harborne, J.B. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide in Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis; Chapman and Hall Ltd.: London, UK, 1998; pp. 221–232. [Google Scholar]
- Onyilagha, J.C.; Islam, S. Flavonoids and other polyphenols of the cultivated species of the genus Phaseolus. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2009, 11, 231–234. [Google Scholar]
- Zovko, K.M.; Kremer, D.; Gruz, J.; Strnad, M.; Bisevac, G.; Kosalec, I. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of Moltkia petraea (tratt.) Griseb. Flower, leaf and stem infusions. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 1537–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ajibade, V.A.; Famurewa, O. Histopathological and toxicological effects of crude saponin extract from Phyllanthus niruri, L (syn. P. franternus. webster) on organs in animal studies. Glob. J. Med. Res. 2012, 12, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
- Wikler, M.A. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard—8th ed.; NCCLS: Vilanova, PA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Methods for Dilution in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests: Approved Standard; NCCLS M2-A5; NCCLS: Vilanova, PA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, J.M.; Wang, Y.F.; Yan, H.L.; Lin, P.; Gu, W.; Yu, J. Antidiabetic effect of total saponins from Polygonatum kingianum in streptozotocin-induced daibetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 179, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiang, L.; Wang, Y.; Yi, X.; Feng, J.; He, X. Furospirostanol and spirostanol saponins from the rhizome of Tupistra chinensis and their cytotoxic and anti-inflammatory activities. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, M.M.; Heraso, C.; Villarreal, M.L.; Vargas-Arispuro, I.; Aranda, E. Biological activities of crude plant extracts from Vitex trifolia L. (Verbenaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 67, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Traditional Medicine-Growing Needs and Potential; WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicine, No. 2; WHO: Genève, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
Phyto-constituent | Vitex doniana | Pentaclethra macrophylla | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves | Stem Bark | Leaves | Stem Bark | |
Tannins (CE/g) | 231 ± 0.6 | 207 ± 0.4 | 152 ± 0.3 | 309 ± 2.42 |
Flavonoids (QE/g) | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 69 ± 1.33 |
Anthroquinones (CE/g) | 23 ± 0.21 | 19 ± 0.11 | 27 ± 0.21 | 55 ± 1.71 |
Alkaloids (%) | 39 ± 0.7 | 33 ± 0.4 | 59 ± 0.7 | 71 ± 0.5 |
Saponins (%) | 54.2 ± 0.58 | 81.2 ± 0.29 | 61.2 ± 0.17 | 87 ± 3.4 |
Plant Extract | Bacterial Strain | Mean Zone of Inhibition (mm) ± SD | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50.0 mg/mL | 25.0 mg/mL | 12.50 mg/mL | 6.25 mg/mL | 3.125 mg/mL | ||
V. doniana ethanolic leaf extract | E. coli | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli ATCC 11775 | - | - | - | - | - | |
S. aureus | 15.5 ± 2.12 | 13.0 ± 0 | 10.0 ± 1.41 | 7.0 ± 0 | - | |
S. aureus ATCC 12600 | 14.5 ± 0.71 | 12.5 ± 0.71 | 10.5 ± 2.12 | - | - | |
P. aeruginosa | - | - | - | - | - | |
P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 | - | - | - | - | - | |
P. macrophylla ethanolic leaf extract | E. coli | 15.0 ± 1.41 | 13.0 ± 0 | 10.5 ± 2.12 | 7.0 ± 0 | - |
E. coli ATCC 11775 | 14.5 ± 2.12 | 11.5 ± 0.71 | 10.5 ± 0.71 | 8.0 ± 1.41 | - | |
S. aureus | 20.0 ± 1.41 | 15.5 ± 0.71 | 11.5 ± 0.71 | 10.0 ± 0 | 8.5 ± 0.71 | |
S. aureus ATCC 12600 | 12.5 ± 0.71 | 9.5 ± 0.71 | 8.5 ± 2.12 | - | - | |
P. aeruginosa | 18.5 ± 0.71 | 15.0 ± 1.41 | 11.5 ± 2.12 | 9.5 ± 0.71 | - | |
P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 | 17.0 ± 0 | 14.0 ± 1.41 | 11.0 ± 1.41 | - | - | |
V. doniana ethanolic stem bark extract | E. coli | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli ATCC 11775 | - | - | - | - | - | |
S. aureus | 17.5 ± 0.71 | 14.0 ± 0 | 10.0 ± 1.41 | 7.0 ± 0 | - | |
S. aureus ATCC 12600 | 20.0 ± 1.41 | 16.5 ± 0.71 | 11.0 ± 1.41 | 8.5 ± 0.71 | 7.0 ± 0 | |
P. aeruginosa | - | - | - | - | - | |
P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 | - | - | - | - | - | |
P. macrophylla ethanolic stem bark extract | E. coli | 17.0 ± 0 | 12.0 ± 1.41 | 11.5 ± 0.71 | 8.5 ± 0.71 | - |
E. coli ATCC 11775 | 19.5 ± 0.71 | 17.0 ± 0 | 13.0 ± 1.41 | 9.0 ± 0 | - | |
S. aureus | 18.5 ± 0.71 | 11.5 ± 0.71 | 9.5 ± 0.71 | 7.5 ± 0.71 | - | |
S. aureus ATCC 12600 | 23.0 ± 2.83 | 15.5 ± 0.71 | 12.5 ± 0.71 | 10.0 ± 0 | 8.5 ± 0.71 | |
P. aeruginosa | 20.0 ± 1.41 | 18.0 ± 0.71 | 16.0 ± 0.71 | 13.0 ± 1.41 | 10.5 ± 0.71 | |
P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 | 19.5 ± 3.54 | 14.5 ± 0.71 | 12.5 ± 0.71 | 10.5 ± 0.71 | 8.0 ± 0 |
Plant Extract | Bacterial Strain | Mean Zone of Inhibition (mm) ± SD | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50.0 mg/mL | 25.0 mg/mL | 12.50 mg/mL | 6.25 mg/mL | 3.125 mg/mL | CPF (100 mg/mL) | ||
V. doniana crude saponin extract | E. coli | 20.0 ± 1.41 | 15.0 ± 1.41 | 10.5 ± 0.71 | 8.0 ± 0 | 7.0 ± 0 | 29.25 |
E. coli ATCC 11775 | 17.0 ± 0 | 12.5 ± 0.71 | 10.5 ± 0.71 | 8.0 ± 0 | - | 28.85 | |
S. aureus | 13.0 ± 1.41 | 10.0 ± 0 | 8.5 ± 0.71 | - | - | 24.85 | |
S. aureus ATCC 12600 | - | - | - | - | - | 22.25 | |
P. aeruginosa | 18.5 ± 0.71 | 16.0 ± 0 | 13.5 ± 0.71 | 10.0 ± 1.41 | 7.5 ± 0.71 | 26.85 | |
P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 | 15.0 ± 0 | 12.0 ± 1.41 | 9.5 ± 0.71 | - | - | 25.25 | |
P. macrophylla crude saponin extract | E. coli | 18.0 ± 1.41 | 14.5 ± 0.71 | 12.0 ± 1.41 | 9.5 ± 0.71 | 7.5 ± 0.71 | 29.25 |
E. coli ATCC 11775 | 13.0 ± 1.41 | 10.0 ± 0 | 8.0 ± 1.41 | - | - | 28.85 | |
S. aureus | 10.5 ± 0.71 | 8.0 ± 0 | 7.0 ± 0 | - | - | 24.85 | |
S. aureus ATCC 12600 | - | - | - | - | - | 22.25 | |
P. aeruginosa | 18.5 ± 0.71 | 13.5 ± 0.71 | 12.0 ± 0 | 10.0 ± 1.41 | 7.5 ± 0.71 | 26.85 | |
P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 | 13.5 ± 0.71 | 10.5 ± 0.71 | 9.0 ± 0 | 7.0 ± 0 | - | 25.25 |
Bacterial Strain | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (mg/mL) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDetl | PMetl | VDets | PMets | VDs | PMs | |
E. coli | - | 0.195 | - | 0.195 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
E. coli ATCC 11775 | - | 0.195 | - | 0.195 | 0.195 | 0.78 |
S. aureus | 0.195 | 0.12 | 0.195 | 0.195 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
S. aureus ATCC 12600 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.12 | 0.12 | - | - |
P. aeruginosa | - | 0.195 | - | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 | - | 0.78 | - | 0.12 | 0.78 | 0.195 |
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Akaniro-Ejim, N.E.; Ubani, C.S.; Nubila, N.I.; Nzei, A.A.; Nwodo, U.U.; Okoh, A.I. Evaluation of Saponin Extract from Vitex doniana and Pentaclethra macrophylla for Antibacterial Activity. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6060180
Akaniro-Ejim NE, Ubani CS, Nubila NI, Nzei AA, Nwodo UU, Okoh AI. Evaluation of Saponin Extract from Vitex doniana and Pentaclethra macrophylla for Antibacterial Activity. Applied Sciences. 2016; 6(6):180. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6060180
Chicago/Turabian StyleAkaniro-Ejim, Nneoma E., Chibuike S. Ubani, Nkoyo I. Nubila, Alexander A. Nzei, Uchechukwu U. Nwodo, and Anthony I. Okoh. 2016. "Evaluation of Saponin Extract from Vitex doniana and Pentaclethra macrophylla for Antibacterial Activity" Applied Sciences 6, no. 6: 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6060180
APA StyleAkaniro-Ejim, N. E., Ubani, C. S., Nubila, N. I., Nzei, A. A., Nwodo, U. U., & Okoh, A. I. (2016). Evaluation of Saponin Extract from Vitex doniana and Pentaclethra macrophylla for Antibacterial Activity. Applied Sciences, 6(6), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6060180