Next Article in Journal
Convergence Analysis of Capacities for Photovoltaics and Energy Storage System Considering Energy Self-Sufficiency Rates and Load Patterns of Rural Areas
Previous Article in Journal
Anomaly Detection in IoT Communication Network Based on Spectral Analysis and Hurst Exponent
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microchannel Fabrication in Fused Quartz by Backside Laser-Induced Plasma Ablation Using 248 nm KrF Excimer Laser

1
Institute of Laser Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2
Key Laboratory of Trans-scale Laser Manufacturing Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100124, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(24), 5320; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245320
Submission received: 12 November 2019 / Revised: 3 December 2019 / Accepted: 4 December 2019 / Published: 6 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Physics General)

Abstract

:
Laser-induced plasma ablation (LIPA) using a 248 nm KrF excimer laser was investigated for microchannel fabrication. Examination of the morphology in relation to ablation performance was emphasized, and a synthetic LIPA mechanism model was proposed based on the results. Backside LIPA with a metal target on the bottom can be attributed to a combination of two phenomena: laser-induced plasma vaporization thermal ablation from the metal target below and enhanced laser–glass direct interaction from the plasma residuum. The laser absorption enhancement of quartz substrate resulting from the metal residuum was validated clearly using absorption spectrum measurements. The influence of laser parameters on the etching quality during LIPA was also analyzed for processing optimization. Finally, fused quartz glass microchannels of outstanding surface quality and dimension uniformity were implemented. The channel depth was 28 μm, and the bottom surface roughness was better than several hundred nanometers.

1. Introduction

Microchannel fabrication for biomedical or chemical analysis is an emerging technique as a fast, low-consumption, miniaturized tool in the biochemistry, analytical chemistry, microsensor, and microtechnology fields [1,2,3,4]. As a typical biologically friendly material, fused quartz glass is widely used in microfluidics owing to various advantages such as low cost, high optical transparency, and structural stability [5,6,7]. Thus, the quartz glass microchannel manufacturing technique attracted increasing attention, especially ultraviolet (UV) laser ablation using excimer lasers (157, 193, and 248 nm) or higher-order harmonics of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) lasers (266 and 355 nm), which are commercially available and provide large single-photon energy, great flexibility, and high manufacturing precision [8,9]. However, fused quartz glass microchannel fabrication by UV laser is still challenging due to the brittle nature of glass and the wide band gap (9 eV) of fused quartz. Good quality of the treatment surface and sufficient etching depth are difficult to approach using traditional direct laser etching [10,11,12,13]. To solve these problems, great effort was exerted in both the theoretical and experimental study of UV laser ablation.
Laser-induced plasma ablation (LIPA), as a novel indirect laser etching technique, was proposed for higher etching efficiency and quality. In such processing, after the laser irradiation, the plasma vapor generated from a metal target on the bottom can effectively ablate the quartz sample’s rear surface, even though the UV laser beam is highly transparent to the substrate. By means of LIPA, the quality of the etched bottom surface can be significantly improved. Zhang et al. presented the LIPA method for fused quartz grating manufacture using a 248 nm KrF laser. The relationship between the grating depth and the number of laser pulses was studied, showing good quality by implementing a 1.06 μm grating period and a 300-nm grating depth [14]. Duan et al. applied the LIPA technique with a UV pulse laser (355 nm) to fabricate quartz glass channels, showing a neat microchannel etched edge without brittle cracking or edge chipping [15]. Cheng et al. proposed backside wet etching using an indium–gallium cryogenic eutectic mixture as the absorption liquid, showing that the etched edge was neat, and the roughness of the bottom surface was approximately 30 nm [16]. In addition to merging the quartz in the liquid, the method of electroplating an absorbing film on the rear quartz surface was also used in LIPA. Hopp et al. presented an LIPA scheme using a 248 nm KrF excimer laser on a fused quartz plate with a 100 nm thick layer of silver. The etched depth of a single pulse reached 600 nm, and the roughness was as low as 2.2 nm [17]. Ihlemann et al. presented the same scheme with a UV absorbing oxide film instead of a silver coating, and single-pulse ablation depths ranging from a few to 500 nm were obtained, with a surface roughness lower than 5 nm [18]. Chemical corrosion [19] or successive electroplating [20] were also employed in LIPA treatment for the fabrication of good-quality microchannels.
Nevertheless, the wet etching system is complicated, and the liquid environment is often toxic. On the other hand, the absorbing layers in the existing literature are only several hundred nanometers thick, the ablation is limited to single-pulse operation, which is insufficient for microchannel fabrication, and tedious coating and removal are necessary during the preparatory and post-processing procedures, respectively. Furthermore, many theoretical models, such as charge and kinetic exchange between the plasma and the sample surface, were proposed to describe the ablation procedure; however, these hypotheses were not validated, and the mechanism of LIPA remains unclear.
To obtain better insight into the processing, we applied LIPA experiments onto fused quartz glass with economic 304-type stainless streel, and an exhaustive morphological study of ablation performance under different influences and laser pulse numbers was conducted with a view to understanding the mechanism. The present paper is organized as follows: firstly, the manufacturing system and the properties of the materials are presented in detail. Secondly, the morphological characteristics of the LIPA channels in different cases are compared, and the ablation mechanism is investigated by discussing and analyzing the experimental results. Finally, through optimization of the parameters, high-quality microchannels were obtained for biomedical applications.

2. Experimental Set-Up

The homemade excimer laser manufacturing system is illustrated in Figure 1. The laser source used in the present work was a commercial KrF excimer LPXpro305 (Coherent Co., Ltd., Santa Clara, CA, USA) that works at 248 nm. The laser pulse width and frequency were 30 ns and 1 Hz, respectively. The excimer laser beam was well aligned using an He–Ne laser indicator light (4D-B, Tuoda Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). A homemade mask with a 2 mm × 2 mm stainless-steel square pinhole was inserted into the beam axis to control the laser focal spot shape and size, through which the excimer laser beam was directed. After placement of the mask, the laser beam was deflected by 90° using a UV reflecting mirror, and subsequently tightly focused on the glass sample by a 10× UV objective. To control the microchannel dimensions and ablation pattern, the glass sample position was adjusted using a three-dimensional (3D) stage. The stage resolution was better than 2 μm in the 50 mm translation range, and the flight velocity could be varied from 0.01 to 6 mm/s along each axis. The laser output parameter settings and the stage translation were controlled by computer. After the ablation experiment, the etched depth and surface roughness were measured by a surface profiler (P7, KLA Tencor. Co., Ltd., Milpitas, CA, USA).
A 1 mm thick UV transparent quartz glass was used in this experiment, and the content of SiO2 was no less than 99.96%. We measured the transmittance spectrum of the fused quartz glass in the UV range prior to ablation using a spectrophotometer. As can be seen in Figure 2, such glass has a good transmittance window in the UV range, and the transmittance is greater than 92% at 248 nm. The 8% transmission loss is due to reflection at the quartz layer surface, such that the 248 nm laser beam is hardly absorbed by the substrates [21]. A 304-type stainless-steel plate (20 mm × 20 mm × 10 mm) was chosen as the target for plasma vaporization generation. The metal target was kept in contact with the rear surface of the fused quartz glass so that the glass could be etched directly by the high-temperature plasma. For preparation, both the glass sample and the stainless-steel target were ultrasonically cleaned in ethanol for 10 min to remove the oxide on the surface before the experiment.

3. Results

Different LIPA processing configurations were performed to understand the mechanism of LIPA. Firstly, to analyze the direct laser–quartz interaction effect, we applied 50 pulses of laser shooting at 2 J/cm2 laser fluence on the bare quartz glass sample without the metal target on the bottom. There was no ablation trace on the quartz surface, proving the extremely low absorption rate of the bare quartz substrate. Subsequently, keeping the quartz sample in the same vertical position, the 304-type stainless-steel target was placed under the quartz layer, and we reapplied 50 pulses at the same laser fluence. The quartz sample after the processing is shown in Figure 3, where a well-defined ablation pattern can be observed very easily, measuring 180 μm × 180 μm. Furthermore, after LIPA, some micro-cracks under the recast layer were found in the rear surface and the edge of the quartz plate [19].
Then, we varied the laser fluence from 0 to 4 J/cm2 and performed a single-pulse ablation series with the metal target to study the dependence of depth on the laser fluence. The resulting depths measured by the surface profiler are shown in Figure 4. When the fluence was lower than 0.7 J/cm2, no ablation occurred, since the laser irradiation fluence was lower than the damage threshold value. Afterward, the ablation depth increased linearly with increasing laser fluence.
Next, we repeated the ablation from 1–250 laser pulses at a fixed 4 J/cm2 laser irradiation energy density. Photographs of the rear surface of the glass and the top surface of the metal target are shown in Figure 5. With 10 laser pulses, the glass was modestly etched (Figure 5a); however, the ablation effect became increasingly obvious as the pulse number increased (Figure 5b). After 220 pulses, the glass broke, and edge chipping was observed (Figure 5c). On the other hand, with increasing laser pulses, the penetration depth of the stainless-steel target increased, and there was more black metal residuum on both the glass and the metal surfaces.
The ablation depth is shown as a function of the pulse number in Figure 6. The depth value increased with the number of pulses in each position. It can be observed that, when the number of pulses was less than 70, the laser ablation effect was very modest, and the depth was less than 3 μm. However, when the pulse number was greater than 70, the ablation depth significantly increased. Furthermore, when the number of pulses exceeded 130, the ablation depth increased more slowly with the number of pulses, and the ablation efficiency began to saturate.
We planned to reapply the direct etching without the metal target with the etched quartz sample after LIPA processing instead of the bare one in Figure 3a, to check if the properties of the sample were changed during the etching. We firstly moved the stage to make a 600 × 1000 μm groove; then, in each node position, 150 laser pulses of LIPA with the metal target at 4 J/cm2 were performed, and the depth was measured to be around 24 μm, similar to that in Figure 6. Consequently, we removed the metal target and reapplied a secondary 20-pulse direct ablation onto the grooving area at the same quartz substrate height. Figure 7 shows the morphology of the sample prior to (a) and following the secondary direct ablation (b). Even without the metal target, the laser could still etch the quartz (in the red circle), which should result from an effect other than plasma etching.
We performed a series of direct ablations without the target under different pulse numbers in the grove area, and the ablation depth values under 20, 50, 70, and 100 pulses are illustrated in Figure 8 (red). These depth values were found to be comparable with those from the previous ablation series with the metal target (blue) under pulse numbers from 150 to 250 in Figure 6. This result indicates again that, with large a pulse number (here, more than 150), the plasma ablation effect can be neglected, while another phenomenon contributes to the quartz etching.

4. Discussion

Considering that the energy gap of quartz is 9 eV, electron excitation from the valence band to the conduction band by a 248 nm KrF laser (5 eV) under an extremely low absorption rate is impossible, such that no ablation trace can be found after direct ablation without the metal target, as shown in Figure 3a. However, with the metal sacrificial plate below, LIPA can effectively etch the quartz sample (Figure 3b). The plasma formation directly depends on laser power, such that the etching depth increases linearly with the irradiation influence, as shown in Figure 4.
From the morphology result displayed in Figure 7 and Figure 8, there appears to be another ablation mechanism when the metal target is absent. After reviewing the literature [22,23], we propose a two-step ablation hypothesis during LIPA to describe the processing dynamics. A schematic of the process in our experiment is depicted in Figure 9.
The excimer irradiation pulse train heats the stainless-steel target, and the martial temperature continuously rises, as shown in Figure 9a. When the fluence is high enough, the upper layer of the metal target is completely melted and vaporized, and a plasma plume including a metal ion and radical is formed, as shown in Figure 9b [19]. The metal vaporization threshold Eth can be expressed as follows [24]:
E t h d τ = π 3 / 2 ( T v T m ) 2 A l tan 1 32 λ l ρ l C l v d + π 3 / 2 ( T m T 0 ) λ s 2 A s tan 1 32 λ s ρ s C s v d ,
where Tv and Tm are the vaporizing and melting temperature values of the material, and T0 is room temperature; d is the laser spot diameter, and τ is the pulse duration; λl, Al, Cl, and ρl are the mean values of thermal conductivity, absorptivity, heat capacity, and density in the liquid state. Likewise, λs, As, Cs, and ρs are the mean values corresponding to the solid state.
The kinetic energy of the ions and free radicals in the plasma vaporization is very high, in the range of a few to several hundred eV. Afterward, the kinetic energy is transferred to the rear surface of the quartz sample, the plasma plume heats the quartz substrate, and the temperature rapidly rises to the 2000 K melting point, at which the quartz sample is melted and vaporized.
We assume the etching depth during each pulse as the same, and the etching duration as shorter than the pulse duration, such that the etching depth h after a single laser pulse of energy E can be expressed simply as follows:
h = α ( E E t h ) = α ( I S E t h ) ,
where α is the etching coefficient. The etching depth is expected to be a linear function of the influence I in a given laser spot area S, which as validated by the result in Figure 4. While considering that the influence distribution is not the uniform, the influence in the central part is higher than at the edge, such that a slightly arched etched top instead of flat top on the quartz rear surface should be formed after the ablation (see Figure 9e). On the other hand, because of the thermal expansion and contraction strain after the rapid melting and cooling of quartz, some micro-cracks appear under the recast layer in Figure 3c,d [19].
Afterward, the metal vapor cools down and freezes, and the black microscale molten metal residuum remains on the rear surface of the quartz. Following several pulses, we propose a hypothesis that the accumulated metal residuum layer and the ablation-induced glass defects cause an increase in the laser absorption rate of the quartz glass, as shown in Figure 9c [25]. Moreover, inverse bremsstrahlung absorption gives rise to a change in the optical properties of the quartz, increasing the absorption rate as well [21]. Then, the laser ablation effect on the glass sample includes both plasma thermal ablation and direct laser–quartz interaction. This can fully explain Figure 6, showing that, when the pulse number was more than 70, the etching rate increased dramatically. In Figure 9d, during ablation processing, the height of the ablation gap between the quartz and the metal surface increased and eventually exceeded the distance of the plasma ejection range. Therefore, less and less plasma vapor can approach the top surface and ablate the quartz, and the ablation efficiency tends to saturate. In this case, the contribution of plasma-induced ablation can be omitted. Only the direct laser ablation effect continues, with absorption enhancement of the metal residuum. This is why the ablation depth increased slowly with more than 150 laser pulses in Figure 6, and the ablation still occurred even without the metal target in Figure 8. However, the residuum does not distribute uniformly on the surface (see Figure 9e), but mainly on the ablation gap edge, and glass edge chipping occurs due to the nonuniform heat conduction (similar to Figure 5f).
To validate our hypothesis of absorption enhancement resulting from the metal residuum, the absorption rates of the resulting quartz sample after the LIPA at 4 J/cm2 fluence were measured using a UV spectrometer (UH-4150, HITACHI Co., Ltd., Marunouchi, Tokyo, Japan). As shown in Figure 10, the absorption ecoefficiencies at 248 nm were measured to be 2.5% and 3.2% after exposure to 10 and 50 laser pulses, respectively. Nevertheless, the absorption rate of the bare quartz plate before exposure was measured to be less than 0.01%. The absorption rate increased by at least two orders of magnitude.
After analyzing the LIPA processing mechanism, we attempted to implement a microscale channel for biomedical application using the optimized parameters. As shown in Figure 11, the LIPA scanning process of a straight-line pattern on fused quartz glass was launched. Considering the practical microchannel dimension requirements and the manufacturing efficiency, the processing parameters were set as follows: laser energy density, 4 J/cm2; translation velocity of the stage, 50 μm/s; laser pulse frequency, 10 Hz. After processing, the metal residuum and molten quartz dust were removed by HF corrosion in the supersonic cleaner. We can observe from Figure 11 the good surface quality of the glass microchannel bottom without edge cracking in the entire structure. The depth was 28 μm, and the roughness on the bottom surface was approximately 150 nm. The channel can be qualified for biomedical microfluidic applications including cell culture or DNA analysis [5,6,7]. It should be noted that, during ablation, the neighboring ablation positions overlapped partly; thus, the depth after the scan was slightly more than that in the single localized hole measured before.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the laser-induced plasma ablation (LIPA) technique was studied experimentally using a 248 nm KrF excimer laser with a 304-type stainless-steel target. A series of fused quartz glass ablation experiments were performed to investigate the LIPA mechanism. Two phenomena were proven to work together during processing: laser-induced plasma thermal ablation and direct laser–glass interaction due to the absorption enhancement of the metal residuum on the bottom surface of the glass.
With the optimized parameters, a depth up to 28 μm of the fused quartz glass channel could be obtained, and the roughness of the surface could be suppressed to several hundred nanometers. Using our etching technique, high-quality quartz channels in different dimensions can be obtained for multiple biomedical applications. This processing method has outstanding advantages over traditional LIPA schemes, such as high simplicity, with no need for toxic liquid absorbents or complicated metal coatings. We believe that this novel technique can provide economic, fast, and reliable microfluidic system fabrication in the future as a good alternative microstructure manufacturing methodology.

Author Contributions

Investigation, conceptualization, and writing, Y.Z.; experimental validation and visualization, Q.L., Z.W., and Z.D.; supervision, T.C.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Project of Science and Technology of Beijing Municipal Education Commission, Grant No. KZ201910005009 and the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation, Grant No. 4194071.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Velve Casquillas, G.; Le Berre, M.; Piel, M.; Tran, P.T. Microfluidic tools for cell biological research. Nano Today 2010, 5, 28–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yang, R.-J.; Fu, L.-M.; Hou, H.-H. Review and perspectives on microfluidic flow cytometers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 266, 26–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sia, S.K.; Whitesides, G.M. Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies. Electrophoresis 2003, 24, 3563–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, W.H.; Ai, F.; Wang, Z.L.; Cheng, J.K. Recent advances in single-cell analysis using capillary electrophoresis and microfluidic devices. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2008, 866, 104–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, M.; Perroud, T.D.; Srivastava, N.; Branda, C.S.; Sale, K.L.; Carson, B.D.; Patel, K.D.; Branda, S.S.; Singh, A.K. Microfluidically-unified cell culture, sample preparation, imaging and flow cytometry for measurement of cell signaling pathways with single cell resolution. Lab. Chip. 2012, 12, 2823–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, J.S.; Cho, J.B.; Park, B.G.; Lee, W.; Lee, K.B.; Oh, M.K. Size-controllable quartz nanostructure for signal enhancement of DNA chip. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 2085–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Greif, D.; Galla, L.; Ros, A.; Anselmetti, D. Author’s personal copy Single cell analysis in full body quartz glass chips with native UV laser-induced fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1206, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Q.S.; You, L.B.; Yu, Y.S.; Zhao, J.M.; Fang, X.D. All-solid-state pulsed excitation source for KHz excimer laser. High Power Laser Part Beams. 2013, 25, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Basting, D. Excimer Laser Technology; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ihlemann, J.; Wolff, B.; Simon, P. Nanosecond and femtosecond excimer laser ablation of fused silica. Appl. Phys. A 1992, 54, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Varel, H.; Ashkenasi, D.; Rosenfeld, A.; Wahmer, M.; Campbell, E.E.B. Micromachining of quartz with uhtrashort laser pulses. Appl. Phys. A 1997, 65, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nikumb, S.; Chen, Q.; Li, C.; Reshef, H.; Zheng, H.Y.; Qiu, H.; Low, D. Precision glass machining, drilling and profile cutting by short pulse lasers. Thin Solid Films 2005, 477, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. He, F.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, Z.Z.; Liao, Y.; Xu, J.; Sun, H.Y.; Wang, C.; Zhou, Z.; Sugioka, K.; Midorikawa, K.; et al. Direct fabrication of homogeneous microfluidic channels embedded in fused silica using a femtosecond laser. Opt. Lett. 2010, 35, 282–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, J.; Sugioka, K.; Midorikawa, K. Direct fabrication of microgratings in fused quartz by laser-induced plasma-assisted ablation with a KrF excimer laser. Opt. Lett. 1998, 23, 1486–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, S. A Study on Laser Etching; Polishing Quartz Glasses Technology; Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Wuhan, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yen, M.H.; Huang, C.W.; Hsu, W.C.; Young, T.H.; Zimmer, K.; Cheng, J.Y. Crack free micromachining on glass substrates by visible LIBWE using liquid metallic absorbers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hopp, B.; Vass, C.S.; Smausz, T. Laser induced backside dry etching of transparent materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 25, 7922–7925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ihlemann, J. UV-laser ablation of fused silica mediated by solid coating absorption. In Proceedings of the Conference on Photon Processing in Microelectronics, Photonics VI, San Jose, CA, USA, 22–25 January 2007; pp. 64580E-1–64580E-7. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pan, C.; Chen, K.; Liu, B.; Ren, L.; Wang, J.; Hu, Q.; Liang, L.; Zhou, J.; Jiang, L. Fabrication of micro-texture channel on glass by laser-induced plasma-assisted ablation and chemical corrosion for microfluidic devices. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 240, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, S.J.; Liu, B.; Pan, C.F.; Ren, L.; Tang, B.; Hu, Q.K.; Jiang, L. Ultrafast fabrication of micro-channels and graphite patterns on glass by nanosecond laser-induced plasma-assisted ablation (LIPAA) for electro fluidic devices. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 247, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Z.J. Mathematical Model of Ultraviolet Pulse LASER Etching; Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Wuhan, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kelly, R.; Dreyfus, R.W. On the effect of Knudsen-layer formation on studies of vaporization, sputtering, and desorption. Surf. Sci. 1988, 198, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hanada, Y.; Sugioka, K.; Miyamoto, I.; Midorikawa, K. Double-pulse irradiation by laser-induced plasma-assisted ablation (LIPAA) and mechanisms study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 248, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zou, J.L.; He, Y.; Wu, S.K.; Huang, T.; Xiao, R.S. Experimental and theoretical characterization of deep penetration welding threshold induced by 1-μm laser. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 357, 1522–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, J.; Sugioka, K.; Midorikawa, K. Laser-induced plasma-assisted ablation of fused quartz using the fourth harmonic of a Nd+: YAG laser. Appl. Phys. A 1998, 67, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the excimer laser processing system.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the excimer laser processing system.
Applsci 09 05320 g001
Figure 2. Ultraviolet (UV) transmission spectrum of the fused quartz glass.
Figure 2. Ultraviolet (UV) transmission spectrum of the fused quartz glass.
Applsci 09 05320 g002
Figure 3. SEM photographs of the quartz samples after 50 laser pulses with the metal target: (a) the entire pattern; (b,c) zoomed view of the edge and the rear surface center region of the plate.
Figure 3. SEM photographs of the quartz samples after 50 laser pulses with the metal target: (a) the entire pattern; (b,c) zoomed view of the edge and the rear surface center region of the plate.
Applsci 09 05320 g003
Figure 4. Profile of ablation depth after single pulse as a function of laser fluence.
Figure 4. Profile of ablation depth after single pulse as a function of laser fluence.
Applsci 09 05320 g004
Figure 5. Photographs of the ablation patterns at 4 J/cm2 laser fluence with different pulse number N. (ac) The rear surfaces of the fused quartz glass samples. (df) The top surfaces of the stainless-steel target.
Figure 5. Photographs of the ablation patterns at 4 J/cm2 laser fluence with different pulse number N. (ac) The rear surfaces of the fused quartz glass samples. (df) The top surfaces of the stainless-steel target.
Applsci 09 05320 g005
Figure 6. The relationship between ablation depth and the number of laser pulses.
Figure 6. The relationship between ablation depth and the number of laser pulses.
Applsci 09 05320 g006
Figure 7. Photographs of the quartz sample without the stainless-steel target: (a) prior to secondary direct ablation; (b) after secondary direct ablation (in the red circle). The inset is the SEM image of the second ablation pattern.
Figure 7. Photographs of the quartz sample without the stainless-steel target: (a) prior to secondary direct ablation; (b) after secondary direct ablation (in the red circle). The inset is the SEM image of the second ablation pattern.
Applsci 09 05320 g007
Figure 8. The ablation depth of the first and second ablation series.
Figure 8. The ablation depth of the first and second ablation series.
Applsci 09 05320 g008
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of laser-induced plasma ablation (LIPA) processing: (a) the laser beam heats the metal target through the quartz plate; (b) target begins to boil and plasma occurs; (c) the quartz plate is etched by the plasma; (d) the saturation of plasma-induced ablation; (e) the close-up of the etching hole on the quartz rear surface.
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of laser-induced plasma ablation (LIPA) processing: (a) the laser beam heats the metal target through the quartz plate; (b) target begins to boil and plasma occurs; (c) the quartz plate is etched by the plasma; (d) the saturation of plasma-induced ablation; (e) the close-up of the etching hole on the quartz rear surface.
Applsci 09 05320 g009
Figure 10. Absorption spectrum of the quartz glass sample.
Figure 10. Absorption spectrum of the quartz glass sample.
Applsci 09 05320 g010
Figure 11. SEM photographs of LIPA-introduced fused quartz glass microchannels: (a,b) the entire channel; (c,d) zoomed view of the rear surface center and the edge.
Figure 11. SEM photographs of LIPA-introduced fused quartz glass microchannels: (a,b) the entire channel; (c,d) zoomed view of the rear surface center and the edge.
Applsci 09 05320 g011

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z.; Dai, Z.; Chen, T. Microchannel Fabrication in Fused Quartz by Backside Laser-Induced Plasma Ablation Using 248 nm KrF Excimer Laser. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5320. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245320

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Li Q, Wang Z, Dai Z, Chen T. Microchannel Fabrication in Fused Quartz by Backside Laser-Induced Plasma Ablation Using 248 nm KrF Excimer Laser. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(24):5320. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245320

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yu, Qian Li, Zhengfei Wang, Ziruo Dai, and Tao Chen. 2019. "Microchannel Fabrication in Fused Quartz by Backside Laser-Induced Plasma Ablation Using 248 nm KrF Excimer Laser" Applied Sciences 9, no. 24: 5320. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245320

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop