Next Article in Journal
Research on Top Archer’s EEG Microstates and Source Analysis in Different States
Previous Article in Journal
A Paradigm for Targeting Functional Impairment as an Outcome in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Altered Development of Prefrontal GABAergic Functions and Anxiety-like Behavior in Adolescent Offspring Induced by Prenatal Stress

by
Arbthip Suwaluk
and
Nuanchan Chutabhakdikul
*
Research Center for Neuroscience, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73130, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(8), 1015; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081015
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 31 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Developmental Neuroscience)

Abstract

:
Maternal stress can afflict fetal brain development, putting the offspring at risk of cognitive deficits, including anxiety. The prefrontal cortex (PFC), a protracted maturing region, is notably affected by prenatal stress (PS). However, it remains unclear how PS interferes with the maturation of the GABAergic system, considering its functional adjustment in the PFC during adolescence. The present study thus investigated the long-lasting consequences of PS on the prefrontal GABAergic functions of adolescent offspring. Pregnant Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into controls and the PS group, which underwent restraint stress during the last week of gestation. Male pups from postnatal days (PND) 40–42 were submitted to the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. Proteins essentially involved in GABAergic signaling were then examined in PFC tissues, including the K+-Cl cotransporter (KCC2), Na+-K+-Cl cotransporter (NKCC1), α1 and α5 subunits of GABA type A receptors (GABAA receptors), and parvalbumin (PV), along with cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation (pCREB), which reacts in the plasticity regulation of PV-positive interneurons. The results revealed that the higher anxiety-like behavior of PS adolescent rats concurred with the significant decreases of the KCC2 and α1 subunits, with PV- and pCREB-lowered levels. The findings suggested that PS disrupts the continuance of PFC maturity by reducing the essential elements of GABAergic functions. These changes likely underlie the anxiety emerging in adolescence, possibly progressing to mental disorders.

1. Introduction

Maternal stress hormones negatively impact fetal growth and cause long-term consequences on the brain and behavioral development of the offspring [1,2]. Considering the brain areas crucial for cognitive and emotional control, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is one of those markedly affected by prenatal stress (PS), especially at the neuronal and synaptic levels [3,4]. In addition, the PFC is an extended developing region and highly plastic during adolescence, which is a period for the emergence of neuropsychiatric diseases [5,6], including anxiety disorders [7,8]. The vulnerability to such diseases notably connects with the prefrontal GABAergic system disruptions [9,10].
The essential elements of the neurotransmitter GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) signaling include cation-chloride cotransporters (CCCs), which actively regulate the intracellular chloride (Cl) concentration [11]. The developmental switching of GABAergic functions from excitation to inhibition depends on the upregulation of the Cl exporter, K+-Cl cotransporter (KCC2) rather than the Cl importer, Na+-K+-Cl cotransporter (NKCC1), which occurs during the early postnatal period in rodents, concurrent with the regulation of the intraneuronal Cl level [12,13,14]. In addition, anion-permeable channels, GABA type A receptors (GABAA receptors), are another vital component in GABAergic functions; GABAA receptors establish and maintain the Cl gradient in coordination with KCC2 and NKCC1 [11,15]. In the PFC, a developmental rise in GABAA receptor α1 subunits corresponds to a reduction in α5 subunits expression with increasing age until maturity [16,17]. Accordingly, α1 subunits incorporate short-lasting responses, conducting fast phasic inhibition [18,19], while α5 subunits involve slow tonic inhibitory conductance [20,21].
Previous studies suggested that PS interferes with CCCs and GABAA receptor subunits, then interrupts the maturity of GABAergic functions, leading to aberrant behaviors. For instance, in the hippocampus (HPC) of rat pups at puberty, PS delayed the GABAergic system maturation by changing the expression of NKCC1 and KCC2, along with GABAA receptor α1 and α5 subunits [22]. Additionally, by measuring the gene expression in adolescent rats, they found that PS primarily increased the NKCC1/KCC2 ratio in the HPC associated with reduced social behaviors [23], as in the amygdala (AMG), PS decreased the expression of KCC2 and increased NKCC1, enhancing the anxiety-like behavior of females [24]. Despite this previous evidence, how PS alters the development of the prefrontal GABAergic system, specifically in adolescence, remains unclear. However, it is somehow related to a significant adjustment of the local GABAergic functions in the PFC during adolescence to drive the maturation of the excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) balance in the prefrontal network [9]. Furthermore, PS has developmental consequences on the substantial group of GABAergic interneurons that express parvalbumin (PV), one of the calcium (Ca2+)-binding proteins markers [25]. PS affected PV-positive interneuron proportion leading to delayed maturation in the HPC and medial frontal cortex (mFC) from childhood to adulthood, correlated with anxiety-like behavior in adult mice [26]. Apart from changes at the cellular level, it should be in question whether PS influences the proteins associated with the molecular mechanism of interneurons. Interestingly, the meticulous study of PV-positive cortical interneurons demonstrated a novel Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase (CaMK) pathway, triggering cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation (pCREB) in activity-dependent gene regulation [27]. Thus, a better understanding of PS effects related to long-term plasticity would provide by investigating PV coupled with pCREB.
This present study aims to examine the effects of PS on the developmental trajectories of the GABAergic system, i.e., the protein levels of KCC2, NKCC1, GABAA receptor α1/α5 subunits, PV, and pCREB, during adolescence in the PFC of male rat pups because of a greater tendency of anxiety-like behavior in males evoked by prenatal psychological stressors such as maternal restraint stress [28]. The information contributed by this study can expand the evidence of PS-induced cellular and molecular alterations in the prefrontal GABAergic functions, which may underlie the anxiety-like behavior in adolescent offspring.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted according to the Guidelines for Care and Use of the Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institute ACUC Committee (COA.NO. MB-ACUC 2015/003).

2.1. Animals

Pregnant Sprague–Dawley rats were transported on the expected gestational day (GD) from the National Experimental Animal Center of Mahidol University. Each was housed individually in a cage with 12 h of light/dark cycle, temperature and humidity control, and free access to food and water. Rats were weighed daily before any manipulation. Then, each pregnant female received nesting materials on the designated delivery day, and the cages were checked twice daily. The appearance of a litter marked postnatal day (PND) 0; pups were weaned on PND 21.

2.2. Maternal Restraint Stress

After random division into the control and PS groups (n = 4), pregnant rats in the PS group underwent immobilization with bright light in the well-ventilated plexiglass cylindrical cage with adjustable lengths. Restraint stress was carried out for four hours daily from GD 14 to GD 20 during the light phase of the cycle [22,29]; the observation of restlessness or suffering signs happened every half an hour. For the control group, pregnant rats were left undisturbed until parturition. The operation of maternal restraint stress was in the last week of gestation, because this period presents the most sensitivity to the behavioral teratogenic effect of PS [30]. Moreover, epigenetic modifications grow more complicated in the late gestational stage, and PS can disturb synaptic remodeling in the brain during this time [3].

2.3. Elevated plus Maze

The elevated plus maze (EPM) test occurred in the dark phase (rats’ active period), and rat behaviors were recorded and analyzed by the SMART video tracking system version 3 (Panlab, Harvard, MA, USA). The apparatus consisted of a plus-shaped maze elevated 50 cm above the floor with two opposite closed arms and open arms (50 × 10 cm) and a center platform (10 × 10 cm). We performed the test in a dark room under dim light to prompt open arms entry of the controls, as suggested by Weinstock [2]. On PND 40–42, male pups from both groups (n = 5) were taken separately from their home cages and rested briefly in transport cages near the testing area. When the record started, each rat stayed on the central platform facing an open arm; the record ran for five minutes, while the observer monitored outside the testing room to avoid any disturbances. Then, the rat was removed from EPM and returned to its home cage before bringing the next one into the room. We thoroughly cleaned the maze floor with diluted citric acid and 70% alcohol between each test. The amount of time spent in open and closed arms, the number of entries into each arm, and the distance traveled in both arms were calculated for anxiety-like behavior assessment [31,32].

2.4. Tissue Preparation

On PND 43–45, rat pups from both groups were decapitated, and fresh PFC tissues were dissected and immediately stored at −80 °C for further use. For fixation, intact pieces of the PFC were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4. The incubation was two nights at 4 °C, then cryoprotection with 30% sucrose in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4. Cryoprotected tissues were embedded in OCT media to set the cutting block and coronally cut for 30 µm-thick in the cryostat machine, hence ordered as ten serial coronal sections. Brain slices were mounted on the gelatin-coated glass slides and kept in the container under −20 °C for further use.

2.5. Reagents

The antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA) as follows; polyclonal goat anti-KCC2 (SC-19420), polyclonal goat anti-NKCC1 (SC-21545), polyclonal goat anti-PV (SC-7448), polyclonal goat anti-GABAA α1 (SC-7348), polyclonal goat anti-GABAA α5 (SC-7357), and mouse anti-β-actin (SC-69879), including the HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Additionally, the monoclonal rabbit anti-pCREB (87G3), polyclonal rabbit anti-tubulin β (SAB4500088), and polyclonal rabbit anti-KCC2 (07-432), were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA), Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA, USA), respectively. Donkey anti-rabbit IgG–secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 594) and the nuclear dye, DAPI, were purchased from Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Lastly, the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Amersham ECL Prime) were obtained from GE Healthcare (Chicago, IL, USA) and the anti-fade mounting solution (VECTASHIELD) was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Newark, CA, USA).

2.6. Western Blot Analysis

The supernatants from PFC tissue lysate were processed through concentration measurement using the Bradford Assay. After concentration adjustment and protein denaturation, each sample with equal volume was resolved in 10–12% SDS-PAGE for 120 minutes before transferring to the PVDF membrane at 100 V for 120 minutes. The membranes were blocking-incubated in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) for the detections of KCC2, NKCC1, PV, pCREB, GABAA receptor α1, and α5 subunits, and in 5% skimmed milk buffer for β-Actin and Tubulin β. Next, the membrane incubation of primary antibody diluted in TBST was applied overnight at 4 °C with antibodies from the commercial sources as follows: polyclonal goat anti-KCC2 (1:1000), polyclonal goat anti-NKCC1 (1:1000), polyclonal goat anti-PV (1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-pCREB (1:1000), polyclonal goat anti-GABAA receptor α1 subunit (1:500), polyclonal goat anti-GABAA receptor α5 subunit (1:1000), mouse anti-β-actin (1:10,000), and polyclonal rabbit anti-tubulin β (1:10,000). After that, the membranes were washed for five minutes each, three times in TBST, and incubated at room temperature with compatible HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in TBST. The membranes were then incubated with the ECL reagents for protein band signaling and detected by film capture or the imaging system machine (Azure Biosystems, Dublin, CA, USA). Band densities were quantified with the ImageJ program developed by the National Institutes of Health, USA.

2.7. Immunohistochemistry

Brain sections were blocking-incubated at room temperature with buffer containing 10% donkey serum plus 0.2% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4. Next, the sections were incubated with the diluted primary antibody, i.e., polyclonal rabbit anti-KCC2 (1:500) (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA) in 2% donkey serum plus 0.2% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4 buffer, overnight at 4 °C. After that, the sections were washed in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4, for five minutes each, three times. The sections were then incubated with donkey anti-rabbit IgG–secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 594; 1:500) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the nuclear dye (DAPI; 1:1,000), diluted in the buffer same as the primary antibody incubation for 1 to 2 hours in a dark-humid chamber at room temperature. After thorough washing, stained brain sections were maintained by the anti-fade mounting solution.

2.8. Image Analysis

The fluorescent-stained brain sections were imaged under a ZEISS confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany) to scan through the z-plane at 40× magnification. The same parameters were applied to all imaging of each section from both groups to control the signal intensity. Two-dimensional images were adjusted with the maximum projection by ZEN microscopy software (ZEN 2.1, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany)

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The data were presented as the mean ± SEM and statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 5 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Accordingly, protein quantification data, the percentage of time spent, the number of entries, and the percentage of distance in the EPM test were compared between the PS and control groups using a Student’s t-test (unpaired two-sample t-test). A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant between the two groups.

3. Results

3.1. Anxiety-like Behavior in Adolescent Rats

PS increases the risk for mental illness in the offspring, such as anxiety [4]. We then assessed anxiety-like behavior in rats based on behaviors in response to a novel set in the EPM, reflecting a conflict between their innate need to explore new surroundings and liking for a dark-enclosed space, which can provoke an avoidance of a high-open area [31,32]. Decreased time spent in the open arms and/or reduced number of entries into the open arms indicate anxiety, while the number of closed arms entries indicates spontaneous motor activity [31], as well as the distance traveled in each area was also measured [32]. As a result, the percent of time spent in the open arms (Figure 1A) was significantly lower in PS adolescent pups than controls, consistent with more time spent in the closed arms (Figure 1B), suggesting higher anxiety in PS male rats. However, the number of entries into the open arms (Figure 1C) and closed arms (Figure 1D), also, the distance traveled in the open arms (Figure 1E) and closed arms (Figure 1F) showed non-significance, implying no difference in the locomotor activity between groups.

3.2. Developmental Shift of Cation-Chloride Cotransporters

KCC2 upregulation is essential for maintaining neuronal Cl homeostasis in GABA inhibitory actions [14]. To investigate this component as a part of GABAergic maturation, Cl exporter, KCC2, and Cl importer, NKCC1, were measured at the protein levels. As a result, PS significantly decreased KCC2 (Figure 2B), and the deficiency of KCC2 expression also showed in the immunohistochemical staining of the medial PFC (Figure 2A). However, there was no significant difference in the NKCC1 level compared to the controls (Figure 2C). These results indicate altered KCC2 switching in the PFC of PS adolescents.

3.3. GABA Type A Receptors Functional Development

Fast phasic inhibition in GABAergic signaling intrinsically contains GABAA receptor α1 subunits; with increasing age in the PFC, an upregulation in α1 subunits aligns with α5 subunit reduction [16,17,18,19]. The protein levels of the α1 and α5 subunits were then measured to investigate the maturing expression of these subunits regarding the functionality of GABAergic inhibition. The results demonstrated PS induced a significant decrease in α1 subunits (Figure 3A) but not α5 subunits (Figure 3B), indicating impaired α1 subunits shifting in the PFC of PS adolescent rats.

3.4. The Plasticity Regulation of GABAergic Interneurons

PV-positive/fast-spiking cells, the substantial group of cortical interneurons, retain prolonged development through the young periods until adolescence [25]. PV is a Ca2+-binding protein, and Ca2+ dynamics in PV-positive cells involve the Ca2+-dependent signaling pathway that regulates the gene expression necessary for long-term plasticity by activating pCREB [27]. The protein levels of PV and pCREB were thus measured to inspect the development of interneurons and the plasticity regulation that can affect their functions. As a result, PS significantly decreased both PV (Figure 4A) and pCREB (Figure 4B), suggesting altered PV and pCREB-dependent activities in the PFC of PS adolescents.

4. Discussion

Maternal stress during pregnancy has been extensively studied for long-lasting effects on the offspring, predisposing cognitive dysfunctions later in life [2,4]. It is still unclear how PS alters the development of prefrontal GABAergic functions in adolescence, inducing impairments such as anxiety. Thus, the present study investigated PS-induced alterations in the elements of the GABAergic system in the PFC of adolescence regarding anxiety in the offspring. The results showed a decrease in KCC2 protein expression in PS rats, while there was no significant difference in the level of NKCC1, indicating an altered developmental shift of KCC2. Moreover, a reduction of GABAA receptor α1 subunits suggests changes in GABAA receptors functionality, although the level of α5 subunits showed no difference. PS also induced alterations of PV and pCREB-dependent activities in the PFC by decreasing both the PV and pCREB protein levels. Therefore, these consequences disturb the prefrontal GABAergic functions, which likely underlies anxiety-like behavior in prenatally stressed adolescent males. However, there was a limitation on the age of adolescence in our study that only tested rats’ behavior on PND 40–42 and collected their brain tissues on PND 43–45. Accordingly, this selected age range corresponds to middle adolescence (PND 34–46), which rodents show increased impulsivity and risk-taking, as reviewed by Holliday and Gould [33]. The range between PND 30 and PND 60 in rats and mice is comparable to adolescence in other species related to behavioral and neurobiological changes, despite no clear-cut point at what age span covers the adolescent period [34]. In addition, rats/mice at around PND 60 are conventionally assessed as adults when reaching physical and sexual maturity [35].
Recently, Milani et al. [28] have proposed that PS-precipitated anxiety-like behaviors result from an imbalance in GABAergic and glutamatergic circuits directly or indirectly induced by neuroinflammation. Both GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission in the PFC undergo significant arrangement during adolescence, particularly GABAergic signaling, which plays a crucial role in refining glutamatergic activity and cortical maturation [6,9,36]. Prefrontal adjustment in adolescence points out the high plasticity of the PFC, and disruptions during this susceptible period led to impaired maturation of the prefrontal GABAergic circuits in adulthood [37,38]. According to anxiety, the modulatory model has demonstrated an imbalance between overactive bottom-up activity from the AMG and dysfunctional top-down control emerging in the PFC [39]. In addition, collecting data in neuroimaging studies has suggested the importance of cortical–subcortical regulatory mechanisms, especially the medial PFC hypoactivity in anxiety disorders [40]. Thus, the integrity of the PFC is necessary for emotional control, and the GABAergic system development in this region is worth understanding.
Focusing on the key elements of GABA transmission, our study examined how PS disturbs the prefrontal development of GABAA receptors by investigating α1 and α5 subunits, since, with increasing age in the PFC, an upregulation in α1 subunits coincides with α5 subunit reduction until adulthood [16,17]. It is known that GABAA receptors mediate fast phasic and slow tonic inhibition by synaptic and extrasynaptic signaling, respectively [11,21]. The extrasynaptic GABAA receptors integrated α5 subunits that downregulate during development [20], as opposed to α1 subunits that promoted faster decay times or rapid responses [18,19]. A developmental shift from α2- to α1-containing GABAA receptors in the PFC also induced faster inhibitory kinetics during adolescence [41]. In this time window, the increased frequency of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) onto pyramidal neurons and GABAA receptor-mediated responses to afferent drive recorded by local field potential manifested the enhancement in prefrontal GABAergic functions [9,42]. Accordingly, homozygous α1−/− mice lacking the primary adult GABAA α1 subunits continued a juvenile phenotype of IPSCs with longer decay time constant values than the wild-type mice, holding the immature form of postsynaptic responses in the cortex [43]. Hence, PS can profoundly impact the maturation of prefrontal GABAergic signaling by interrupting developmental switching of GABAA receptor α1 subunits, as found in our study.
The adolescent enhancement of GABAergic functions in the PFC also connects with an increase in the total PV levels due to the distribution of PV-positive processes with a slight increase in PV-positive cells [44]. However, the reduced PV protein level in our study probably relates to the delayed migration of cortical GABAergic progenitors caused by PS [45]. The delayed sequence continued after birth, with a decreased population of PV-positive cells in the HPC and mFC in adolescence; despite no differences in total GABAergic cells in adulthood, an altered proportion of PV-positive interneurons underlie anxiety-like behavior [26]. Moreover, prenatal exposure to a proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-6, could repeat the effect of PS on interneuron progenitor migration [46]; additionally, in the maternal immune activation model, disruptions of PV-positive interneurons in the PFC correlated with anxiety-like behavior in the adult offspring [47]. Therefore, either alone or combined with immune activation, PS can affect GABAergic interneuron development, leading to an imbalance in GABAergic and glutamatergic circuits that precipitate anxiety [28], as mentioned earlier.
We also showed that PS reduced pCREB, an activated transcription factor in a novel CaMK-dependent pathway that controls the plasticity of PV-positive interneurons [27]. As one of the neuronal Ca2+-binding proteins, the prevalence of PV suggests that Ca2+ dynamics regulation is vital for the activity of these cells [48]. Consistently, PV-positive interneurons are fast-spiking neurons and potent regulators for the E/I balance in the PFC, mediating gamma oscillations [49]. In schizophrenia, MRI-based investigations measuring cortical GABA offered evidence of decreased GABA transmission linked with abnormal gamma-band activity [50]. Additionally, the anxiety disorders rates were significantly higher in schizophrenia patients than in the general population [51], and PS is well-known to be a risk factor for psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and anxiety involved with inhibitory neuron pathology [52]. Thus, decreased protein levels of PV and pCREB, possibly leading to altered PV-dependent activity, play a part in PS-induced deficits of inhibitory functions. However, there was another limitation in this study, because we did not directly investigate pCREB in PV-positive interneurons. Therefore, altered plasticity regulations in this cell type need more specific inspections in future studies.
Furthermore, we demonstrated that PS causes long-term consequences by interfering with the developmental shift of KCC2 in the PFC. In the mature brain, the intracellular Cl concentration is typically low to support hyperpolarization mediated by Cl influx through GABAA receptors [14,53]. The gene-targeted KCC2−/− mice model highlighted the significance of KCC2 for neuronal Cl homeostasis and cortical GABA transmission, in which cortical neurons lacking KCC2 failed in a developmental decrease of intracellular Cl and Cl loading regulations [54]. In addition, hypomorphic KCC2-deficient mice also showed various deficits, including increased anxiety-like behavior [55]. Additionally, the gene expression study reported reduced social behaviors in prenatally stressed adolescent rats with decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf) transcripts and an increased NKCC1/KCC2 ratio in the HPC, but in the PFC, there were only gender-dependent changes in Bdnf [23]. Nonetheless, our study showed decreased protein levels of KCC2 in the PFC of rats at the same age period. These inconsistent findings are possibly associated with the different effects of PS on transcriptional and post-translational controls of KCC2 expression [56]. Transforming growth factor β2 (TGF-β2) has been introduced as a post-translational regulator of KCC2 for membrane trafficking and functionality by activating pCREB and Ras-associated binding protein 11b in its pathway [57]. Interestingly, the finding of pCREB in our study corresponds with this cascade; we then suggest a further question of whether the decrease in pCREB induced by PS is related to TGF-β2 signaling that consequently disturbs KCC2 expression.
In conclusion, PS elicits long-term effects by interrupting the maturity process of the GABAergic system, leading to disruptions of the prefrontal E/I balance underlying adolescent anxiety that can further progress to mental illness. Accordingly, the adolescent period is a transition from being children to adults, a manifestation of disturbances in the continuance of PFC maturity, as shown in our study, anticipating the problems of emotional and cognitive control in adulthood. Therefore, more understanding of how PS affects adolescent brains and behaviors is necessary to prevent neuropsychiatric diseases and improve the treatments. In addition, future studies may need to clarify the mechanisms that these studied factors contribute to alterations in the developmental trajectories of the PFC and provide the prospects for intervention targets.

Author Contributions

A.S.; funding acquisition, experimental design, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, and preparation of the original draft manuscript. N.C.; conceptualization, funding acquisition, experimental design, project administration, validation, supervision, interpretation of the data, and critical review and editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the research grant from the Royal Golden Jubilee (RGJ) Ph.D. Program by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF), Grant No. PHD/0063/2554 to A.S. and N.C. with joint support from the Research Career Development Grant by the TRF, Grant No. RSA5780016 to N.C.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the Guidelines for Care and Use of the Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institute ACUC Committee (COA.NO. MB-ACUC 2015/003).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Advanced Cell Imaging Center, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University for the confocal microscopy imaging and Chanati Jantrachotechatchawan for gifting the reagents and making thoughtful suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reynolds, R.M. Glucocorticoid excess and the developmental origins of disease: Two decades of testing the hypothesis—2012 Curt Richter Award Winner. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weinstock, M. Prenatal stressors in rodents: Effects on behavior. Neurobiol. Stress 2017, 6, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bock, J.; Wainstock, T.; Braun, K.; Segal, M. Stress In Utero: Prenatal Programming of Brain Plasticity and Cognition. Biol. Psychiatry 2015, 78, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Van den Bergh, B.R.H.; van den Heuvel, M.I.; Lahti, M.; Braeken, M.; de Rooij, S.R.; Entringer, S.; Hoyer, D.; Roseboom, T.; Räikkönen, K.; King, S.; et al. Prenatal developmental origins of behavior and mental health: The influence of maternal stress in pregnancy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2020, 117, 26–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mills, K.L.; Goddings, A.L.; Clasen, L.S.; Giedd, J.N.; Blakemore, S.J. The Developmental Mismatch in Structural Brain Maturation during Adolescence. Dev. Neurosci. 2014, 36, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Caballero, A.; Granberg, R.; Tseng, K.Y. Mechanisms contributing to prefrontal cortex maturation during adolescence. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 70, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sah, P. Interneurons in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Role in the Genesis of Anxiety in Adolescence? Biol. Psychiatry 2019, 86, 650–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Newman, E.; Thompson, W.K.; Bartsch, H.; Hagler, D.J.; Chen, C.-H.; Brown, T.T.; Kuperman, J.M.; McCabe, C.; Chung, Y.; Libiger, O.; et al. Anxiety is related to indices of cortical maturation in typically developing children and adolescents. Brain Struct. Funct. 2016, 221, 3013–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Caballero, A.; Tseng, K.Y. GABAergic Function as a Limiting Factor for Prefrontal Maturation during Adolescence. Trends Neurosci. 2016, 39, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zimmermann, K.S.; Richardson, R.; Baker, K.D. Maturational Changes in Prefrontal and Amygdala Circuits in Adolescence: Implications for Understanding Fear Inhibition during a Vulnerable Period of Development. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tang, X.; Jaenisch, R.; Sur, M. The role of GABAergic signalling in neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021, 22, 290–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ben-Ari, Y. Excitatory actions of gaba during development: The nature of the nurture. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ben-Ari, Y. The GABA excitatory/inhibitory developmental sequence: A personal journey. Neuroscience 2014, 279, 187–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ben-Ari, Y.; Khalilov, I.; Kahle, K.T.; Cherubini, E. The GABA Excitatory/Inhibitory Shift in Brain Maturation and Neurological Disorders. Neuroscientist 2012, 18, 467–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Knoflach, F.; Hernandez, M.-C.; Bertrand, D. GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission: Not so simple after all. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016, 115, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duncan, C.E.; Webster, M.J.; Rothmond, D.A.; Bahn, S.; Elashoff, M.; Shannon Weickert, C. Prefrontal GABAA receptor α-subunit expression in normal postnatal human development and schizophrenia. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2010, 44, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Datta, D.; Arion, D.; Lewis, D.A. Developmental Expression Patterns of GABAA Receptor Subunits in Layer 3 and 5 Pyramidal Cells of Monkey Prefrontal Cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 25, 2295–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bosman, L.W.J.; Rosahl, T.W.; Brussaard, A.B. Neonatal development of the rat visual cortex: Synaptic function of GABAa receptor α subunits. J. Physiol. 2002, 545, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vicini, S.; Ferguson, C.; Prybylowski, K.; Kralic, J.; Morrow, A.L.; Homanics, G.E. GABAA Receptor α1 Subunit Deletion Prevents Developmental Changes of Inhibitory Synaptic Currents in Cerebellar Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Caraiscos Valerie, B.; Elliott Erin, M.; You-Ten Kong, E.; Cheng Victor, Y.; Belelli, D.; Newell, J.G.; Jackson Michael, F.; Lambert Jeremy, J.; Rosahl Thomas, W.; Wafford Keith, A.; et al. Tonic inhibition in mouse hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons is mediated by α5 subunit-containing γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 3662–3667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Farrant, M.; Nusser, Z. Variations on an inhibitory theme: Phasic and tonic activation of GABAA receptors. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Veerawatananan, B.; Surakul, P.; Chutabhakdikul, N. Maternal restraint stress delays maturation of cation-chloride cotransporters and GABAA receptor subunits in the hippocampus of rat pups at puberty. Neurobiol. Stress 2016, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Berry, A.; Panetta, P.; Luoni, A.; Bellisario, V.; Capoccia, S.; Riva, M.A.; Cirulli, F. Decreased Bdnf expression and reduced social behavior in periadolescent rats following prenatal stress. Dev. Psychobiol. 2015, 57, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ehrlich, D.E.; Neigh, G.N.; Bourke, C.H.; Nemeth, C.L.; Hazra, R.; Ryan, S.J.; Rowson, S.; Jairam, N.; Sholar, C.A.; Rainnie, D.G.; et al. Prenatal stress, regardless of concurrent escitalopram treatment, alters behavior and amygdala gene expression of adolescent female rats. Neuropharmacology 2015, 97, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Woodward, E.M.; Coutellier, L. Age- and sex-specific effects of stress on parvalbumin interneurons in preclinical models: Relevance to sex differences in clinical neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 131, 1228–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lussier, S.J.; Stevens, H.E. Delays in GABAergic interneuron development and behavioral inhibition after prenatal stress. Dev. Neurobiol. 2016, 76, 1078–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cohen, S.M.; Ma, H.; Kuchibhotla, K.V.; Watson, B.O.; Buzsáki, G.; Froemke, R.C.; Tsien, R.W. Excitation-Transcription Coupling in Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons Employs a Novel CaM Kinase-Dependent Pathway Distinct from Excitatory Neurons. Neuron 2016, 90, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Roshan-Milani, S.; Seyyedabadi, B.; Saboory, E.; Parsamanesh, N.; Mehranfard, N. Prenatal stress and increased susceptibility to anxiety-like behaviors: Role of neuroinflammation and balance between GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission. Stress 2021, 24, 481–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chutabhakdikul, N.; Surakul, P. Prenatal stress increased Snk Polo-like kinase 2, SCF β-TrCP ubiquitin ligase and ubiquitination of SPAR in the hippocampus of the offspring at adulthood. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2013, 31, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Freide, E.; Weinstock, M. The effects of prenatal exposure to predictable or unpredictable stress on early development in the rat. Dev. Psychobiol. 1984, 17, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Walf, A.A.; Frye, C.A. The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ari, C.; D’Agostino, D.P.; Diamond, D.M.; Kindy, M.; Park, C.; Kovács, Z. Elevated Plus Maze Test Combined with Video Tracking Software to Investigate the Anxiolytic Effect of Exogenous Ketogenic Supplements. JoVE 2019, 143, e58396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Holliday, E.; Gould, T.J. Nicotine, adolescence, and stress: A review of how stress can modulate the negative consequences of adolescent nicotine abuse. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 65, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Eiland, L.; Romeo, R.D. Stress and the developing adolescent brain. Neuroscience 2013, 249, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Crestani, C.C. Adolescent vulnerability to cardiovascular consequences of chronic emotional stress: Review and perspectives for future research. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 74, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Le Magueresse, C.; Monyer, H. GABAergic Interneurons Shape the Functional Maturation of the Cortex. Neuron 2013, 77, 388–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Cass, D.K.; Flores-Barrera, E.; Thomases, D.R.; Vital, W.F.; Caballero, A.; Tseng, K.Y. CB1 cannabinoid receptor stimulation during adolescence impairs the maturation of GABA function in the adult rat prefrontal cortex. Mol. Psychiatry 2014, 19, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Thomases, D.R.; Cass, D.K.; Tseng, K.Y. Periadolescent Exposure to the NMDA Receptor Antagonist MK-801 Impairs the Functional Maturation of Local GABAergic Circuits in the Adult Prefrontal Cortex. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nuss, P. Anxiety disorders and GABA neurotransmission: A disturbance of modulation. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015, 11, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Etkin, A. Functional Neuroanatomy of Anxiety: A Neural Circuit Perspective. In Behavioral Neurobiology of Anxiety and Its Treatment; Stein, M.B., Steckler, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 251–277. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hashimoto, T.; Nguyen, Q.L.; Rotaru, D.; Keenan, T.; Arion, D.; Beneyto, M.; Gonzalez-Burgos, G.; Lewis, D.A. Protracted developmental trajectories of GABAA receptor alpha1 and alpha2 subunit expression in primate prefrontal cortex. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 65, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Caballero, A.; Thomases, D.R.; Flores-Barrera, E.; Cass, D.K.; Tseng, K.Y. Emergence of GABAergic-dependent regulation of input-specific plasticity in the adult rat prefrontal cortex during adolescence. Psychopharmacology 2014, 231, 1789–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bosman, L.W.J.; Heinen, K.; Spijker, S.; Brussaard, A.B. Mice Lacking the Major Adult GABAA Receptor Subtype Have Normal Number of Synapses, But Retain Juvenile IPSC Kinetics Until Adulthood. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Caballero, A.; Flores-Barrera, E.; Cass, D.K.; Tseng, K.Y. Differential regulation of parvalbumin and calretinin interneurons in the prefrontal cortex during adolescence. Brain Struct. Funct. 2014, 219, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Stevens, H.E.; Su, T.; Yanagawa, Y.; Vaccarino, F.M. Prenatal stress delays inhibitory neuron progenitor migration in the developing neocortex. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Gumusoglu, S.B.; Fine, R.S.; Murray, S.J.; Bittle, J.L.; Stevens, H.E. The role of IL-6 in neurodevelopment after prenatal stress. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 65, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Canetta, S.; Bolkan, S.; Padilla-Coreano, N.; Song, L.J.; Sahn, R.; Harrison, N.L.; Gordon, J.A.; Brown, A.; Kellendonk, C. Maternal immune activation leads to selective functional deficits in offspring parvalbumin interneurons. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 956–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Eyles, D.W.; McGrath, J.J.; Reynolds, G.P. Neuronal calcium-binding proteins and schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2002, 57, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ferguson, B.R.; Gao, W.-J. PV Interneurons: Critical Regulators of E/I Balance for Prefrontal Cortex-Dependent Behavior and Psychiatric Disorders. Front. Neural Circuits 2018, 12, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. McNally, J.M.; McCarley, R.W. Gamma band oscillations: A key to understanding schizophrenia symptoms and neural circuit abnormalities. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2016, 29, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kiran, C.; Chaudhury, S. Prevalence of comorbid anxiety disorders in schizophrenia. Ind. Psychiatry J. 2016, 25, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fine, R.; Zhang, J.; Stevens, H.E. Prenatal stress and inhibitory neuron systems: Implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 2014, 19, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Schulte, J.T.; Wierenga, C.J.; Bruining, H. Chloride transporters and GABA polarity in developmental, neurological and psychiatric conditions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 90, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhu, L.; Lovinger, D.; Delpire, E. Cortical Neurons Lacking KCC2 Expression Show Impaired Regulation of Intracellular Chloride. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 93, 1557–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Tornberg, J.; Voikar, V.; Savilahti, H.; Rauvala, H.; Airaksinen, M.S. Behavioural phenotypes of hypomorphic KCC2-deficient mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 21, 1327–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chamma, I.; Chevy, Q.; Poncer, J.C.; Levi, S. Role of the neuronal K-Cl co-transporter KCC2 in inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Roussa, E.; Speer, J.M.; Chudotvorova, I.; Khakipoor, S.; Smirnov, S.; Rivera, C.; Krieglstein, K. The membrane trafficking and functionality of the K+-Cl− co-transporter KCC2 is regulated by TGF-β2. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 3485–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Anxiety-like behavior in adolescent rats. (A) Time spent in the open arms. (B) Time spent in the closed arms. Bar graphs display the results from the percentage calculation compared between the control and prenatal stress (PS) groups; the significant differences are at * p < 0.05. (C) Number of entries into the open arms. (D) Number of entries into the closed arms. Bar graphs display the results from counted number calculation compared between the control and PS groups; non-significance (ns) was found. (E) Distance in the open arms. (F) Distance in the closed arms. Bar graphs display the results from the percentage calculation compared between the control and PS groups; non-significance (ns) was found. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Figure 1. Anxiety-like behavior in adolescent rats. (A) Time spent in the open arms. (B) Time spent in the closed arms. Bar graphs display the results from the percentage calculation compared between the control and prenatal stress (PS) groups; the significant differences are at * p < 0.05. (C) Number of entries into the open arms. (D) Number of entries into the closed arms. Bar graphs display the results from counted number calculation compared between the control and PS groups; non-significance (ns) was found. (E) Distance in the open arms. (F) Distance in the closed arms. Bar graphs display the results from the percentage calculation compared between the control and PS groups; non-significance (ns) was found. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Brainsci 12 01015 g001
Figure 2. Developmental shift of cation–chloride cotransporters. (A) Immunohistochemical staining of KCC2. Expression in the medial prefrontal cortex between the control (left) and prenatal stress (PS) (right) groups; white arrows indicate KCC2-positive cells (upper; red) merged with the nuclear stain DAPI (lower; blue), scale bar = 20 µm. (B) Western blotting of KCC2. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and PS (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the KCC2/ß–actin ratio; the significant differences at *** p < 0.001. (C) Western blotting of NKCC1. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and PS (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the NKCC1/ß–actin ratio; non-significance (ns) was found. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Figure 2. Developmental shift of cation–chloride cotransporters. (A) Immunohistochemical staining of KCC2. Expression in the medial prefrontal cortex between the control (left) and prenatal stress (PS) (right) groups; white arrows indicate KCC2-positive cells (upper; red) merged with the nuclear stain DAPI (lower; blue), scale bar = 20 µm. (B) Western blotting of KCC2. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and PS (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the KCC2/ß–actin ratio; the significant differences at *** p < 0.001. (C) Western blotting of NKCC1. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and PS (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the NKCC1/ß–actin ratio; non-significance (ns) was found. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Brainsci 12 01015 g002aBrainsci 12 01015 g002b
Figure 3. GABA type A receptors functional development. (A) Western blotting of GABAA receptor α1 subunits. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and prenatal stress (PS) (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the GABAA receptor α1/ß–actin ratio; the significant differences at *** p < 0.001. (B) Western blotting of the GABAA receptor α5 subunits. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and PS (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the GABAA receptor α5/ß–actin ratio; non-significance (ns) was found. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Figure 3. GABA type A receptors functional development. (A) Western blotting of GABAA receptor α1 subunits. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and prenatal stress (PS) (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the GABAA receptor α1/ß–actin ratio; the significant differences at *** p < 0.001. (B) Western blotting of the GABAA receptor α5 subunits. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and PS (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the GABAA receptor α5/ß–actin ratio; non-significance (ns) was found. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Brainsci 12 01015 g003
Figure 4. The plasticity regulation of GABAergic interneurons. (A) Western blotting of PV. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and prenatal stress (PS) (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the PV/β–actin ratio; the significant differences at *** p < 0.001. (B) Western blotting of pCREB. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and PS (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the pCREB/Tubulin-β ratio; the significant differences at *** p < 0.001. Data are shown as Mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Figure 4. The plasticity regulation of GABAergic interneurons. (A) Western blotting of PV. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and prenatal stress (PS) (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the PV/β–actin ratio; the significant differences at *** p < 0.001. (B) Western blotting of pCREB. Upper, band comparing the control (left) and PS (right) groups; lower, bar graph displays the analysis of protein band densities of the pCREB/Tubulin-β ratio; the significant differences at *** p < 0.001. Data are shown as Mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Brainsci 12 01015 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suwaluk, A.; Chutabhakdikul, N. Altered Development of Prefrontal GABAergic Functions and Anxiety-like Behavior in Adolescent Offspring Induced by Prenatal Stress. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081015

AMA Style

Suwaluk A, Chutabhakdikul N. Altered Development of Prefrontal GABAergic Functions and Anxiety-like Behavior in Adolescent Offspring Induced by Prenatal Stress. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12(8):1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suwaluk, Arbthip, and Nuanchan Chutabhakdikul. 2022. "Altered Development of Prefrontal GABAergic Functions and Anxiety-like Behavior in Adolescent Offspring Induced by Prenatal Stress" Brain Sciences 12, no. 8: 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081015

APA Style

Suwaluk, A., & Chutabhakdikul, N. (2022). Altered Development of Prefrontal GABAergic Functions and Anxiety-like Behavior in Adolescent Offspring Induced by Prenatal Stress. Brain Sciences, 12(8), 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop