Next Article in Journal
Supramarginal Gyrus and Angular Gyrus Subcortical Connections: A Microanatomical and Tractographic Study for Neurosurgeons
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Automated Speech Processing for Repeated Measurements in a Clinical Setting of the Behavioral Variability in the Stroop Task
Previous Article in Journal
Task Demands and Sentence Reading Comprehension among Healthy Older Adults: The Complementary Roles of Cognitive Reserve and Working Memory
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Drives Animal Fluency Performance in Cantonese-Speaking Chinese Patients with Adult-Onset Psychosis?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/brainsci13030429
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Temporal Stability of the Dynamic Resting-State Functional Brain Network: Current Measures, Clinical Research Progress, and Future Perspectives

by
Yicheng Long
†,
Xiawei Liu
† and
Zhening Liu
*
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(3), 429; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030429
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 20 February 2023 / Accepted: 28 February 2023 / Published: 1 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to the Psychopathology of Psychotic Disorders)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Based on functional magnetic resonance imaging and multilayer dynamic network model, the brain network’s quantified temporal stability has shown potential in predicting altered brain functions. This manuscript aims to summarize current knowledge, clinical research progress, and future perspectives on brain network’s temporal stability. There are a variety of widely used measures of temporal stability such as the variance/standard deviation of dynamic functional connectivity strengths, the temporal variability, the flexibility (switching rate), and the temporal clustering coefficient, while there is no consensus to date which measure is the best. The temporal stability of brain networks may be associated with several factors such as sex, age, cognitive functions, head motion, circadian rhythm, and data preprocessing/analyzing strategies, which should be considered in clinical studies. Multiple common psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder have been found to be related to altered temporal stability, especially during the resting state; generally, both excessively decreased and increased temporal stabilities were thought to reflect disorder-related brain dysfunctions. However, the measures of temporal stability are still far from applications in clinical diagnoses for neuropsychiatric disorders partly because of the divergent results. Further studies with larger samples and in transdiagnostic (including schizoaffective disorder) subjects are warranted.

1. Introduction

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is currently one of the best methods to study the functional activity of the human brain under non-invasive conditions [1,2]. Using fMRI technology, many common psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia [2,3], bipolar disorder [4,5] and major depressive disorder [6,7] have been found to be accompanied by abnormal functional connectivity (FC) between brain areas and changes in brain network topological properties on large scales, which provide potential markers for the auxiliary diagnosis of these disorders.
In traditional fMRI research, computational analyses are generally based on the assumption that functional connections between different areas of the brain remain constant during the whole fMRI scan. However, it has been suggested that the patterns of brain FC actually fluctuate dynamically over time even at the resting state, which are ignored by traditional fMRI data analysis methods [8,9]. Therefore, research on the dynamic fluctuations of the FC patterns of the brain during fMRI scan so-called dynamic FC (dFC) has emerged in recent years [10,11,12]. Several studies have shown that after excluding disturbing factors such as head movement, dFC can still accurately reflect the inherent individual differences between subjects [13,14]. Based on multiple repeated fMRI scans on the same subjects, it was also shown that multiple dFC measures have acceptable test–retest reliability [14,15], which demonstrates the feasibility and reliability of dFC measures.
In dFC studies, a commonly used approach is to model the human brain network as a multilayer “dynamic network” and then evaluate the temporal stability/variability of such dynamic networks in a graph theory-based framework. Such an approach has shown potential for predicting alterations in brain functions in both normal [14,16] and pathological [17,18] conditions in clinical studies. However, compared with traditional static brain network measures, the dynamic brain network model remains a relatively new area and its clinical applications are still in the exploration phase. This manuscript briefly introduces the basic concepts, commonly used measures, and possible influencing factors of the temporal stability of brain networks, and narratively summarizes its clinical research progresses in common psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression, in order to provide new highlights for understanding the relationship between common psychiatric disorders and brain functional stability based on the dynamic brain network model.

2. The Basic Concepts and Commonly Used Measures of the Temporal Stability of a Brain Network

In a framework of graph theory, the functional brain network can be modeled as a complex network, which abstracts the brain into a series of “nodes” and “edges” connecting those “nodes” [19]. Each of these “nodes” typically represents a brain region defined based on an anatomical or functional brain map, while the “edge” between each of the two “nodes” represents the strength of the functional connection between them [19,20]. In traditional static brain network models, the strengths of these “edges” are constant; in contrast, in dynamic network models, the strengths of each “edge” change dynamically over time [21]. Such changes are typically estimated by dividing the fMRI signal of the entire scan into several time periods, and then calculating the connection strengths of each “edge” in the brain network in different time periods. To achieve this, the often-used method is dividing the entire fMRI signal into several non-overlapped or partially overlapped “time windows” by the “sliding-window” approach [17,22,23,24], while there are also other methods [25]. As a result, a dynamic brain network can be constructed as G = (Gt)t = 1, 2, 3…, where Gt is the layer representing brain dFC within the tth time period (the tth time window) (Figure 1). Compared with the static brain network model, the dynamic brain network model thus incorporates an additional time dimension to track the dynamic changes in the brain network.
After constructing a dynamic brain network, the temporal stability of the brain network can be then estimated from both global (at the whole-brain level) and regional levels. The higher temporal stability indicates that a brain network is more stable (fluctuates less) over time. It is noteworthy that there are various measures of temporal stability proposed by different researchers, which is introduced later. Moreover, there are measures to quantitatively analyze the other characteristics of a dynamic brain network beyond simply estimating its temporal stability (Figure 1). For instance, another dynamic brain network-based analysis technique is to use clustering, where the layers (time windows) in a dynamic brain network are portioned into a set of clusters or “states” using the K-means clustering [26] or principal components analysis (PCA) [27]; this family of technique summarizes the dFC patterns into a number of “states” and may provide a more comprehensive overview of dynamic changes in the brain network [12]. Nevertheless, there is no consensus to date concerning which measure is the best to characterize the temporal fluctuations in dFC patterns. We introduce below several of the most commonly used measures of temporal stability for a dynamic brain network:
(1) Variance and the standard deviation [16,23,28,29,30]: Possibly the most straightforward and simple method to estimate the temporal stability of “edges” in a dynamic brain network is to calculate the variance or the standard deviation of dFC strengths of each edge across different layers (time windows). Intuitively, a higher variance or a higher standard deviation suggests lower temporal stability of dFC between brain nodes. The advantages of this measure include the simple analyzing steps and short calculating time. However, there are studies reporting that such measures may be less reliable when compared to other measures [28,31].
(2) Temporal variability [17,18,32,33,34]: The “temporal variability” of a dynamic brain network is estimated by averaging the dissimilarity of its network structures between different layers (time windows). The exact formula for such calculations can be found in the previous related publications [17,18,32,33,34]. This measure can be computed at both the global (temporal variability) and regional (nodal temporal variability) levels. Additionally, it can be also computed at the subnetwork level (within-subnetwork and between-subnetwork temporal variability) to reflect the temporal stability of dFC patterns within/between particular large-scale brain subsystems. A higher value of temporal variability indicates lower temporal stability of a dynamic brain network (more variable over time).
(3) Flexibility [22,35,36,37,38]: This measure is also called “switching rate”; it estimates the temporal stability of a dynamic brain network according to its modularity structures. The flexibility or “switching rate” of a given brain node quantifies the rate at which it transits between different functional modules. Higher flexibility or “switching rate” suggests that the brain network transit between different configurations at a higher rate, and thus with lower temporal stability. The flexibility can be also computed at the global and subnetwork levels, by averaging all nodes within the whole brain network or those nodes belonging to a particular subnetwork.
(4) Temporal clustering coefficient [14,17,21,39,40]: This measure is also called “the temporal correlation coefficient”; it is derived from the definition of analogous metric (clustering coefficient) for conventional static networks. The temporal clustering coefficient estimates the tendency of a dynamic brain network to keep stable over time (its “temporal clustering”) by quantifying the average topological overlap of the network connections between any two consecutive layers (i.e., neighboring time windows). A higher temporal clustering coefficient suggests that the brain network is more likely to keep stable over time (showing higher temporal stability). Similar to the brain network flexibility, the temporal clustering coefficient can be computed at all the nodal, subnetwork, and global levels.
In addition to these four measures, there are also other methods to measure the temporal stability of dynamic brain networks. One example is independently calculating the traditional “static” topological properties of the brain network within each layer (time window) and then estimating their changing ranges by the area under the curve (AUC) [41] or the temporal deviation of each network property (“temporal grading index”) [42]. Based on the earlier-mentioned state-clustering algorithm, the stability of dynamic brain networks can be also measured by switching frequencies between different “states” [43]. Nevertheless, in this current manuscript, we focus on the abovementioned four kinds of measures that have been commonly used in published neuroimaging studies.

3. Possible Influencing Factors When Analyzing the Temporal Stability of a Brain Network

Prior studies of dynamic human brain networks have shown that the temporal stability of brain networks may be associated with factors such as sex, age, and cognitive functions. Furthermore, it was suggested that the results of dFC studies might be influenced by some factors such as the participants’ head motion during the fMRI scanning, as well as several data preprocessing and analyzing strategies. These reports suggest that attention should be given to controlling the potential influences of these factors in the clinical applications of dynamic brain network models.
(1) Sex: In studies using traditional static brain network models, sex and age were typically controlled as covariates since they are thought to have significant influences on many important brain network properties [44,45]. For dFC studies, there have been also several studies to investigate the possible sex effects on the temporal stability of brain networks. Interestingly, although conflicting results exist [46], we notice many of these studies found that the females’ brain networks seem to be more stable over time compared to the males’ brain networks [14,43,47]. For instance, one study using a state-clustering algorithm suggested that the females’ brain networks switch connectivity states less frequently than the males’ and can thus be considered more stable over time [43]; in another study using the temporal clustering coefficient, it was found that the females’ brain networks are more stable than the males’ and such differences are significant at both the global and regional (particularly within the default-mode and subcortical regions) levels [14]. These findings may not only highlight the necessity to control for sex effects in dFC studies, but also provide valuable insight into the sex differences in clinical characteristics of many mental problems and disorders (e.g., females are more likely to be affected by depression) [48,49,50].
(2) Age: There have been a number of studies investigating the possible age-related effects in the temporal stability of dynamic brain networks at the resting state [16,51,52,53], many of which used relatively large samples. For instance, using data from 902 healthy controls, Tang et al. [54] found a significant aging-related increase in temporal variability of dFC within the default-mode network. Similarly, Qin et al. [53] examined age-related differences in dFC patterns with data from 183 subjects aged 7–30, and found that higher age is associated with higher temporal variability of the connections among the visual network, default mode network, and cerebellum. In addition, Marusak et al. [52] analyzed the dynamic brain network characteristics of 146 children and adolescents aged 7 to 16 years old, and found that the temporal variabilities of dFC among multiple neurocognitive networks are positively associated with age. Overall, these results suggest the process of maturation/aging of the brain may be accompanied by increased temporal variability (decreased temporal stability) of the brain network. However, there were also opposite findings: e.g., Xia et al. [51] reported that age is negatively associated with the variability of dynamic functional networks by analyzing the resting scan data of a total of 434 subjects. Nevertheless, the changes in temporal stability-based dFC measures may be an important characteristic of the maturation/aging process but further investigations are still needed to provide a deep understanding of such relationships.
(3) Cognitive functions: Several studies have shown that the temporal stability of dynamic brain networks may be associated with multiple dimensions of cognitive function. For instance, Hilger et al. [55] found that higher intelligence is associated with higher temporal stability (lower temporal variability) of brain network modularity. The other cognitive factors which may be associated with the temporal stability of brain networks include executive function [56], learning ability [35], working memory [36], cognitive flexibility [57], verbal creativity [33], and the need for cognition [58]. Therefore, it might be better to consider the possible influences of different levels of cognition in clinical studies on dFC, especially when performing direct comparisons between the groups of healthy controls and psychiatric populations. An alternative way to achieve this could be to include education level as a covariate in the analyses, as performed by many researchers [14,17,59,60].
(4) Head motion: There have been multiple studies pointing out that the subjects’ head motion would considerably affect the obtained dFC patterns [61,62]. Therefore, to minimize the possible influences of head motion, it is necessary to perform motion artifact removal steps during the data preprocessing stage [61]. Moreover, we propose that in clinical studies, it would be better to match the levels of head motion between different groups; it would also be better to include the head motion parameters (e.g., mean framewise-displacement) as an additional covariate in the analyses, as performed by many researchers [14,17,59,60].
(5) Circadian rhythm: It has been raised by many researchers that the fluctuations in fMRI signals can be critically affected by circadian rhythm; for example, it was reported that healthy participants’ brain FC can be significantly affected by the time of the day, which was hypothesized to be related to effects of different cortisol levels at different time points [63,64]. Therefore, although there is currently only limited knowledge about the direct influences of circadian rhythm on the measures of brain network’s temporal stability, it would be better to control for possible influences of circadian rhythm in clinical studies. One of the beneficial solutions, for example, is acquiring all the fMRI data approximately at the same time of the day [63].
(6) Data preprocessing and analyzing strategies: In dFC studies, it is possible that the values of dynamic brain network measures (including temporal stability) could be affected by different choices in some data preprocessing and analyzing strategies. For example, the dynamic brain network measures may be different when performing and not performing the global signal regression (GSR) during data preprocessing; the dynamic brain network measures also could be different when choosing different window lengths and step lengths, two key parameters of the sliding-window approach [61]. Actually, there are still debates about the necessity of GSR [65] and about the optimal window lengths/step lengths in the sliding-window approach [31,66]. Nevertheless, in a number of studies on the temporal stability of brain networks, the analyzes were repeated with different strategies and it was found that consistent results can be obtained when performing/not performing GSR, and when using a set of different window lengths/step lengths in the sliding-window step [14,17,24]; therefore, the main conclusions in these studies are unlikely to be largely driven by the choices in data preprocessing and analyzing strategies.

4. Research Progress on Possible Relationships between the Temporal Stability of Resting-State Brain Networks and Common Psychiatric Disorders

In recent years, researchers have explored abnormal changes in the temporal stability of brain networks in patients with multiple psychiatric disorders, especially at the resting state and in three of the most common psychiatric disorders worldwide: schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Here, we briefly summarize the relevant research progress in the following paragraphs based on search results from PubMed (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/, accessed on 30 January 2023). Note that since there are a variety of different measures for the temporal stability of brain networks, we used different searching keywords for different measures separately. For example, the searching strategies for finding studies on schizophrenia using the measure of temporal variability are: “(schizophrenia) AND (‘dynamic functional connectivity’ OR ‘dynamic brain network’) AND (‘temporal variability’)”, and all of the reviewed articles are published before 30 January 2023.
An overview of the sample sizes, measures used for temporal stability, and main findings of all mentioned studies can be found in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3; moreover, some additional information such as the diagnostic criteria for psychiatric disorders in each research report are listed in Table A1, Table A2 and Table A3. The patients with psychiatric disorders were diagnosed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria in almost all the referred studies (except one study using the DSM-V criteria). The participants with drug abuse history and other severe psychiatric or somatic disorders have been excluded in almost all the referred studies (except one study where this issue was not mentioned).
(1) Schizophrenia: Schizophrenia is perhaps one of the most thoroughly studied psychiatric disorders as for its relationship with the brain’s temporal stability based on the dynamic brain network model. For instance, in 2016, Zhang et al. [18] studied two separate samples of 69 schizophrenic patients/62 healthy controls and 53 schizophrenic patients/67 healthy controls, respectively. They found that the patients with schizophrenia showed significantly increased temporal variability (decreased temporal stability) of dFCs in the subcortical regions such as the thalamus, pallidum, and putamen, and in the visual cortex at the resting state; additionally, the schizophrenia patients showed significantly decreased temporal variability (increased temporal stability) in the relevant regions of the default-mode network. Afterward, Dong et al. [34] and Long et al. [32] also investigated the changes in temporal variability of brain dFC patterns in schizophrenia patients and they found similar results: both of them observed that the schizophrenia patients showed significantly increased temporal variability (decreased temporal stability) in sensory and perceptual systems (including the visual, sensorimotor, and attention networks, along with thalamus) but decreased temporal variability (increased temporal stability) in higher-order networks (e.g., the default-mode and frontal–parietal networks). Using the measure of flexibility, Gifford et al. [67] also found that the temporal stabilities of dFC in multiple brain regions including the thalamus are significantly decreased in schizophrenia patients.
Overall, all these findings point to a significant widespread decrease in temporal stability of dFC in most of the brain systems, especially the sensory and perceptual systems (e.g., visual cortex, sensorimotor cortex, and thalamus), and an increase in certain higher systems (e.g., frontal–parietal and default-mode networks) in schizophrenia patients. Actually, there are several other studies (beyond those above) that reported similar conclusions [68,69], although inconsistent reports also exist [70]. These findings may support the opinion that such widespread aberrant dynamic brain network reconfigurations may be a potential biomarker for schizophrenia, suggestive of impaired abilities in effectively filter inputs in sensory/perceptual systems and integrating information in high-order networks, which may underlie the perceptual and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia [32,34].
Table
Table 1. Summary of main findings of changes in the temporal stability of brain network in patients with schizophrenia (SZ) as mentioned in this manuscript. dFC, dynamic functional connectivity; HCs, healthy controls.
Table 1. Summary of main findings of changes in the temporal stability of brain network in patients with schizophrenia (SZ) as mentioned in this manuscript. dFC, dynamic functional connectivity; HCs, healthy controls.
ReferenceSampleMeasure of Temporal Stability Main Findings on the Temporal Stability in SZ Patients
Zhang et al. [18]Two datasets: 69 SZ patients/62 HCs and 53 SZ patients/67 HCsTemporal variabilityDecreased stability in subcortical and visual regions; increased stability in default-mode regions
Dong et al. [34]102 SZ patients/124 HCsTemporal variabilityDecreased stability in visual, sensorimotor, and attention networks, as well as thalamus; increased stability in default-mode and frontal–parietal networks
Long et al. [32]66 SZ patients/66 HCsTemporal variabilityDecreased temporal stability in sensorimotor, visual, attention, limbic, and subcortical areas; increased stability in default-mode areas
Gifford et al. [67]55 SZ patients/72 HCsFlexibilityDecreased stability in cerebellar, subcortical, and fronto-parietal task control networks
Guo et al. [70]22 SZ patients/60 HCsTemporal variabilityDecreased stability in dFC anchored on the precuneus
Wang et al. [68]42 SZ patients/35 HCsStandard deviationDecreased stability in dFCs among multiple networks
Sheng et al. [69]Two datasets: 51 SZ patients/63 HCs and 36 SZ patients/60 HCsTemporal variabilityDecreased stability in prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, temporal cortex, visual cortex, and hippocampus
(2) Major depressive disorder: Major depressive disorder is also one of the most focused disorders in clinical studies on the temporal stability of human brain networks. Among these studies, Long et al. [17] reported that the level of temporal variabilities of dFCs are significantly increased (indicating decreased temporal stability) in patients with major depressive disorder at both the whole-brain level and subnetwork level within the default-mode, sensorimotor, and subcortical networks. Using the measure of temporal clustering coefficient, Zhao et al. [39] found that patients with major depressive disorder showed decreased temporal stability at the global level and in regions of sensory perception systems. Hou et al. [71] and Ouyang et al. [40] found that patients with major depressive disorder showed decreased temporal stability within the striatum and default-mode regions, respectively. Overall, these findings suggest that major depressive disorder may be associated with excessive fluctuation (decreased temporal stability) of functional brain network organizations, and the default-mode areas are most prominently involved. The default-mode network is thought to be primarily involved in processing one’s self-referential and internally directed information [72]. Therefore, the instability of the default-mode network dFCs was hypothesized to be related to uncontrollable, too-frequent thinking activities about negative emotions and event, known as “rumination” in patients with depression [17]. Actually, another study by Wise et al. [73] has also strongly supported such an opinion: they proved that temporal stabilities of dFCs within several key default-mode regions are significantly decreased in major depressive disorder, which was replicated in two independent samples.
However, we notice that the findings in a number of other published studies are not consistent with the above reports. For example, Demirtaş et al. [74] compared the temporal variability of dFCs quantified as the index of dispersion (variance/mean) between patients with major depressive disorder and healthy controls; and they found that the patients showed significantly decreased variability (increased temporal stability) of dFCs between the default-mode and fronto-parietal networks. In another study using the measure of brain network flexibility, Tian et al. [75] found that the patients with major depressive disorder showed increased temporal stability within the default-mode and cognitive control networks. Han et al. [76] also reported decreased switching rates (increased temporal stability) within several default-mode regions such as the precuneus and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex in patients with major depressive disorder. Furthermore, Zhou et al. [30] also reported that major depressive disorder is characterized by excessive stable (increased temporal stability) dFCs within default-mode areas such as the precuneus. These results are not consistent and even conflict with those studies mentioned in the last paragraph.
Here, we propose that the inconsistencies in previous studies on major depressive disorder may be partly due to several reasons. First, we notice that the sample sizes in some studies are relatively small (Table 2), which may lead to less reliable results [77]. Second, it is possible that major depressive disorder is a disorder with significant clinical and biological heterogeneity; for example, it has been suggested that major depressive disorder-related brain dysfunctions may differ in different age groups (e.g., early adulthood vs. late-life) of patients [78]. Therefore, subtypes with distinct dFC profiles (e.g., hyper- and hypo-stability) may exist in major depressive disorder, which can be investigated in future studies.
Table
Table 2. Summary of main findings of changes in the temporal stability of brain network in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) as mentioned in this manuscript. HCs, healthy controls.
Table 2. Summary of main findings of changes in the temporal stability of brain network in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) as mentioned in this manuscript. HCs, healthy controls.
ReferenceSampleMeasure of Temporal StabilityMain Findings on the Temporal Stability in MDD Patients
Demirtaş et al. [74]27 MDD patients/
27 HCs		Variance/meanIncreased stability in dFCs between default-mode and fronto-parietal networks
Long et al. [17]460 MDD patients/
473 HCs		Temporal variability and temporal clustering coefficientDecreased stability mainly in default-mode, sensorimotor, and subcortical areas
Wise et al. [73]Two datasets: 20 MDD patients/19 HCs and 19 MDD patients/19 HCsThe standard deviationDecreased stability within several key default-mode regions
Zhao et al. [39]55 MDD patients/
62 HCs		Temporal clustering coefficientDecreased stability at global level and in sensory perception regions
Hou et al. [71]77 MDD patients/
40 HCs		Temporal variabilityDecreased stability in inferior occipital gyrus and pallidum
Ouyang et al. [40]55 MDD patients/
21 HCs		Temporal clustering coefficientDecreased stability at global level, and within default-mode and subcortical networks
Zhou et al. [30]19 MDD patients/
22 HCs		The varianceIncreased stability in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and precuneus connectivity
Tian et al. [75]35 MDD patients/
35 HCs		FlexibilityIncreased stability within default-mode and cognitive control networks
Han et al. [76]61 MDD patients/61 HCsFlexibility (switching rate)Increased stability in precuneus, parahippocampal gyrus, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, and striatum
(3) Bipolar disorder: Similar to schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, many researchers have explored possible changes in the temporal stability of brain networks in patients with bipolar disorder. For example, Nguyen et al. [79] found that compared with healthy controls, patients with euthymic bipolar disorder showed significantly reduced dFC variability (increased temporal stability) between the medial prefrontal lobe and the posterior cingulate gyrus in the resting-state. Han et al. [76] found that patients with bipolar disorder showed decreased network switching rates (increased temporal stability) of regions including the left precuneus, bilateral dorsal medial prefrontal cortex, and bilateral parahippocampal gyrus. Liang et al. [80] found that compared to healthy participants, patients with bipolar disorder showed decreased variance (increased temporal stability) of dFC between the posterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex. Using the measure of temporal variability, Long et al. [32] found increased temporal variability (decreased temporal stability) of dFCs profiles within subcortical areas, and between the thalamus and sensorimotor areas. Wang et al. [81] reported that depressed bipolar disorder patients showed increased temporal stability of dFC between the default-mode network and central executive network when compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, Luo et al. [82] reported the group of depressed bipolar disorder patients had reduced dFC variance (increased temporal stability) between the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the left inferior parietal lobule than the healthy group.
In summary, most of the published studies mentioned above suggest that bipolar disorder is associated with an excessively increased temporal stability of the brain network. Moreover, at the local level, certain brain areas have been repeatedly reported to be involved in two or more studies (e.g., the posterior cingulate gyrus) (Table 3). However, generally, there is no significant convergence of the regional dFC abnormalities in bipolar disorder across these published studies. Such inconsistencies in previous studies may be firstly due to their relatively small sample sizes (Table 3), which may lead to relatively low statistical power and relatively low reliability [77]. Beyond that, it is possible that bipolar disorder-related brain dysfunctions may be characterized by different changes in different clinical states (e.g., in depression, mania, and euthymic states [83]. However, the direct comparisons on brain network stability between different clinical states of bipolar disorder are still relatively limited to our knowledge, which merits further investigations in the future.
Table
Table 3. Summary of main findings of changes in the temporal stability of brain network in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) as mentioned in this manuscript. dFC, dynamic functional connectivity; HCs, healthy controls.
Table 3. Summary of main findings of changes in the temporal stability of brain network in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) as mentioned in this manuscript. dFC, dynamic functional connectivity; HCs, healthy controls.
ReferenceSampleMeasure of Temporal Stability Main Findings on the Temporal Stability in BD Patients
Nguyen et al. [79]15 euthymic BD patients/19 HCsStandard deviationIncreased stability between medial prefrontal lobe and posterior cingulate gyrus
Han et al. [76]40 BD patients/61 HCsFlexibility (switching rate)Increased stability in precuneus, parahippocampal gyrus, and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex
Wang et al. [81]51 depressed BD patients/52 HCsStandard deviationIncreased stability between default-mode and central executive networks
Long et al. [32]53 BD patients/66 HCsTemporal variabilityDecreased stability in dFCs within subcortical areas and between thalamus and sensorimotor areas
Liang et al. [80]18 BD patients/19 HCStandard deviationIncreased stability in dFC between posterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex
Luo et al. [82]106 depressed BD patients/130 HCsStandard deviationDecreased stability between posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and inferior parietal lobule
(4) Other psychiatric disorders: Although we focus on schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder in this manuscript, alterations in temporal stabilities of dynamic brain networks have been also reported in multiple other neuropsychiatric disorders. For example, Harlalka et al. [84] found that patients with autism spectrum disorder showed a significant increase in dynamic variability (decreased temporal stability) in a wide range of brain network connections. Additionally, significantly decreased temporal stabilities of brain networks have been associated with both substance [85] and non-substance [59] addictions, suggesting that brain network instability may play an important role in the onset of these disorders.

5. Discussion: Summary and Future Perspectives

In summary, based on the fMRI technical and the dynamic brain network model, researchers have proposed a number of measures to quantify the temporal stability of the human brain network, and their associations with multiple common psychiatric disorders (especially in patients with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder) have been explored. Generally, both excessively decreased and increased temporal stabilities have been reported in psychiatric populations, and both of them were thought to be reflective of disorder-related brain dysfunctions. For example, in most of the published relevant studies, schizophrenia was often associated with decreased temporal stability (Table 1), while bipolar disorder was often associated with increased temporal stability of brain networks (Table 3). These findings might provide a unique perspective for deepening our understanding of these disorders.
However, the measures of temporal stability are still far from applications in clinical diagnoses for neuropsychiatric disorders, partly because of the divergent and even conflicting results on its associations with common psychiatric disorders (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). As discussed earlier, the inconsistent results in previous studies may be due to the relatively small sample sizes in many of them, and the possibility that there is biological heterogeneity in these disorders (e.g., major depressive disorder-related brain dysfunctions may differ in different age groups of patients). Therefore, future studies with larger samples may be warranted to further investigate the relationships between brain network’s temporal stability and common psychiatric disorders, along with the potential biological heterogeneity in these disorders as reflected by temporal stability.
It is also noteworthy that while most current clinical studies on the temporal stability of brain networks were performed during a resting state, it has been suggested that altered temporal stability during a certain task (e.g., working memory task [86]) can be reflective of brain dysfunctions, too. Nevertheless, the number of task-based studies on temporal stability is much more limited than that of resting-state ones; for such a reason, we chose to focus on the temporal stability of brain networks during rest in this manuscript. More future studies may be needed to investigate the possible associations between common psychiatric disorders and the temporal stability of brain networks under certain cognitive/emotional tasks.
Another potentially valuable direction in future studies is to investigate the possible transdiagnostic alterations in the temporal stability of brain networks (those alterations shared by different disorders). It is well known that many psychiatric disorders have some overlapping clinical features (e.g., psychotic symptoms can happen in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder), and it is thus hypothesized that there may be some common pathogenesis between them [32]. Therefore, investigating the common and different features of the brain network’s temporal stability across different psychiatric disorders may help to strengthen our understanding of their shared and distinct pathogenesis. Actually, several studies have evaluated the differences in temporal stability of brain networks between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [32], and between major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder [76]. Nevertheless, the number of studies simultaneously including multiple disorders is still limited to our knowledge, and more studies are needed in the future.
Furthermore, besides the common psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder, the current knowledge is much limited on possible relationships between the brain network’s temporal stability and several relatively rarer but important disorders. For example, schizoaffective disorder is a separate disorder between schizophrenia and bipolar spectra [87,88]. To our knowledge, however, there are only a limited number of dFC studies on schizoaffective disorder, most of which used the state-clustering algorithm [89,90], and no published study has investigated possible associations between schizoaffective disorder and the brain network’s temporal stability using the measures we focused on in the current manuscript. Therefore, further studies on other disorders such as schizoaffective disorder are warranted.
Future studies can also benefit from longitudinal follow-ups, while most of the current studies mentioned were cross-sectional designs. This is partly because some patients may be misdiagnosed at base-line and obtaining a correct diagnosis requires time. For example, it has been reported that a considerable proportion of schizophrenia patients may receive a new diagnosis (e.g., secondary schizophrenia) during the follow-up [91].
Finally, many psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia) have been proved to be accompanied by structural changes in the brain, such as a significant decline in the white matter integrity [92]. Moreover, some of these disorders (e.g., schizophrenia) have been associated with a changed stability of the rhythm from a chronobiological point of view, which can be measured by other biological measures such as temperature, pulse, and blood pressure [93,94]. However, to the best of our knowledge, it is still poorly known whether there are links between these changes and altered temporal stability of the brain network in patients with psychiatric disorders. These questions above may deserve further exploration in future studies.
This manuscript has several limitations. Firstly, as mentioned earlier, some of the existing measures of brain network temporal stability can be referred to differently by various researchers; e.g., the “flexibility” is also called “switching rates” by some researchers. Thus, because of this reason, some published studies might have been missed during the literature search. Secondly, while the current manuscript provides only a narrative review on current studies on temporal stability, conducting a well-designed systematic review or a meta-analysis may further improve our understanding of the relationships between common psychiatric disorders and the temporal stability of brain networks.

Author Contributions

X.L., Y.L. and Z.L. conceived the idea and structured the manuscript. X.L. and Y.L. drafted the manuscript. Y.L. designed the figures and tables. Z.L. reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82201692 to Y.L., 82071506 to Z.L.), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2021JJ40851 to Y.L.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Additional information about the studies on schizophrenia (SZ) as mentioned in this manuscript. DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Table A1. Additional information about the studies on schizophrenia (SZ) as mentioned in this manuscript. DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
ReferenceDiagnostic Criteria for SZWas Drug Abuse History Excluded?Were Other Severe Psychiatric or Somatic Disorders Excluded?
Zhang et al. [18]DSM-IVYesYes
Dong et al. [34]DSM-IVYesYes
Long et al. [32]DSM-IVYesYes
Gifford et al. [67]DSM-IVYesYes
Guo et al. [70]DSM-IVYesYes
Wang et al. [68]DSM-IVYesYes
Sheng et al. [69]DSM-IVYesYes
Table
Table A2. Additional information about the studies on major depressive disorder (MDD) as mentioned in this manuscript. DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Table A2. Additional information about the studies on major depressive disorder (MDD) as mentioned in this manuscript. DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
ReferenceDiagnostic Criteria for MDDWas Drug Abuse History Excluded?Were Other Severe Psychiatric or Somatic Disorders Excluded?
Demirtaş et al. [74]DSM-IVYesYes
Long et al. [17]DSM-IVNot mentionedNot mentioned
Wise et al. [73]DSM-IVYesYes
Zhao et al. [39]DSM-IVYesYes
Hou et al. [71]DSM-IVYesYes
Ouyang et al. [40]DSM-IVYesYes
Zhou et al. [30]DSM-IVYesYes
Tian et al. [75]DSM-IVYesYes
Han et al. [76]DSM-IVYesYes
Table
Table A3. Additional information about the studies on bipolar disorder (BD) as mentioned in this manuscript. DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Table A3. Additional information about the studies on bipolar disorder (BD) as mentioned in this manuscript. DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
ReferenceDiagnostic Criteria for BDWas Drug Abuse History Excluded?Were Other Severe Psychiatric or Somatic Disorders Excluded?
Nguyen et al. [79]DSM-IVYesYes
Han et al. [76]DSM-IVYesYes
Wang et al. [81]DSM-IVYesYes
Long et al. [32]DSM-IVYesYes
Liang et al. [80]DSM-IVYesYes
Luo et al. [82]DSM-VYesYes

References

  1. Canario, E.; Chen, D.; Biswal, B. A Review of Resting-State FMRI and Its Use to Examine Psychiatric Disorders. Psychoradiology 2021, 1, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lin, Z.; Long, Y.; Wu, Z.; Xiang, Z.; Ju, Y.; Liu, Z. Associations between Brain Abnormalities and Common Genetic Variants for Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review of Structural and Functional Neuroimaging Findings. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2021, 10, 10031–10052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cao, H.; Zhou, H.; Cannon, T.D. Functional Connectome-Wide Associations of Schizophrenia Polygenic Risk. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26, 2553–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Du, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Ji, E.; Han, X.; Huang, G.; Liang, Z.; Shi, L.; Yang, H.; Zhang, Z. Abnormal Transitions of Dynamic Functional Connectivity States in Bipolar Disorder: A Whole-Brain Resting-State FMRI Study. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 289, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Macoveanu, J.; Stougaard, M.E.; Kjærstad, H.L.; Knudsen, G.M.; Vinberg, M.; Kessing, L.V.; Miskowiak, K.W. Trajectory of Aberrant Reward Processing in Patients with Bipolar Disorder—A Longitudinal FMRI Study. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 312, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, Z.B.; Li, L.; Li, X.Y.; Castellanos, F.X.; Bai, T.J.; Bo, Q.J.; Cao, J.; Chang, Z.K.; et al. Disrupted Intrinsic Functional Brain Topology in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26, 7363–7371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yan, C.G.; Chen, X.; Li, L.; Castellanos, F.X.; Bai, T.J.; Bo, Q.J.; Cao, J.; Chen, G.M.; Chen, N.X.; Chen, W.; et al. Reduced Default Mode Network Functional Connectivity in Patients with Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 9078–9083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hutchison, R.M.; Womelsdorf, T.; Gati, J.S.; Everling, S.; Menon, R.S. Resting-State Networks Show Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Awake Humans and Anesthetized Macaques. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34, 2154–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang, C.; Glover, G.H. Time-Frequency Dynamics of Resting-State Brain Connectivity Measured with FMRI. Neuroimage 2010, 50, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cavanna, F.; Vilas, M.G.; Palmucci, M.; Tagliazucchi, E. Dynamic Functional Connectivity and Brain Metastability during Altered States of Consciousness. Neuroimage 2018, 180, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shunkai, L.; Chen, P.; Zhong, S.; Chen, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.; He, J.; Su, T.; Yan, S.; Luo, Y.; et al. Alterations of Insular Dynamic Functional Connectivity and Psychological Characteristics in Unmedicated Bipolar Depression Patients with a Recent Suicide Attempt. Psychol. Med. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Preti, M.G.; Bolton, T.A.; van de Ville, D. The Dynamic Functional Connectome: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives. Neuroimage 2017, 160, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, J.; Liao, X.; Xia, M.; He, Y. Chronnectome Fingerprinting: Identifying Individuals and Predicting Higher Cognitive Functions Using Dynamic Brain Connectivity Patterns. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018, 39, 902–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Long, Y.; Ouyang, X.; Yan, C.; Wu, Z.; Huang, X.; Pu, W.; Cao, H.; Liu, Z.; Palaniyappan, L. Evaluating Test–Retest Reliability and Sex-/Age-Related Effects on Temporal Clustering Coefficient of Dynamic Functional Brain Networks. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Omidvarnia, A.; Zalesky, A.; Mansour, L.S.; van de Ville, D.; Jackson, G.D.; Pedersen, M. Temporal Complexity of FMRI Is Reproducible and Correlates with Higher Order Cognition. Neuroimage 2021, 230, 117760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhao, X.; Sha, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, J.; Ni, H.; Ming, D. Age-Related Decline in the Variation of Dynamic Functional Connectivity: A Resting State Analysis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Long, Y.; Cao, H.; Yan, C.; Chen, X.; Li, L.; Castellanos, F.X.; Bai, T.; Bo, Q.; Chen, G.; Chen, N.; et al. Altered Resting-State Dynamic Functional Brain Networks in Major Depressive Disorder: Findings from the REST-Meta-MDD Consortium. Neuroimage Clin. 2020, 26, 102163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.; Cheng, W.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, K.; Lei, X.; Yao, Y.; Becker, B.; Liu, Y.; Kendrick, K.M.; Lu, G.; et al. Neural, Electrophysiological and Anatomical Basis of Brain-Network Variability and Its Characteristic Changes in Mental Disorders. Brain 2016, 139, 2307–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rubinov, M.; Sporns, O. Complex Network Measures of Brain Connectivity: Uses and Interpretations. Neuroimage 2010, 52, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, D.; Tang, S.; Wu, Z.; Yang, J.; Liu, Z.; Wu, G.; Sariah, A.; Ouyang, X.; Long, Y. Changes in Brain Network Properties in Major Depressive Disorder Following Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Combined Static and Dynamic Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2022, 11, 1969–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sizemore, A.E.; Bassett, D.S. Dynamic Graph Metrics: Tutorial, Toolbox, and Tale. Neuroimage 2018, 180, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Long, Y.; Chen, C.; Deng, M.; Huang, X.; Tan, W.; Zhang, L.; Fan, Z.; Liu, Z. Psychological Resilience Negatively Correlates with Resting-State Brain Network Flexibility in Young Healthy Adults: A Dynamic Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Ann. Transl. Med. 2019, 7, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Y.; Cui, Q.; Xie, A.; Pang, Y.; Sheng, W.; Tang, Q.; Li, D.; Huang, J.; He, Z.; Wang, Y.; et al. Abnormal Dynamic Functional Connectivity Density in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 261, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, Y.; Collinson, S.L.; Suckling, J.; Sim, K. Dynamic Reorganization of Functional Connectivity Reveals Abnormal Temporal Efficiency in Schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 2019, 45, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Xie, H.; Zheng, C.Y.; Handwerker, D.A.; Bandettini, P.A.; Calhoun, V.D.; Mitra, S.; Gonzalez-Castillo, J. Efficacy of Different Dynamic Functional Connectivity Methods to Capture Cognitively Relevant Information. Neuroimage 2019, 188, 502–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Allen, E.A.; Damaraju, E.; Plis, S.M.; Erhardt, E.B.; Eichele, T.; Calhoun, V.D. Tracking Whole-Brain Connectivity Dynamics in the Resting State. Cerebr. Cortex 2014, 24, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leonardi, N.; Richiardi, J.; Gschwind, M.; Simioni, S.; Annoni, J.M.; Schluep, M.; Vuilleumier, P.; van de Ville, D. Principal Components of Functional Connectivity: A New Approach to Study Dynamic Brain Connectivity during Rest. Neuroimage 2013, 83, 937–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Guo, L.; Han, J.; Hu, X. Test–Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Naturalistic Paradigm Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2022, 43, 1463–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Choe, A.S.; Nebel, M.B.; Barber, A.D.; Cohen, J.R.; Xu, Y.; Pekar, J.J.; Caffo, B.; Lindquist, M.A. Comparing Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Methods. Neuroimage 2017, 158, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhou, W.; Yuan, Z.; Yingliang, D.; Chaoyong, X.; Ning, Z.; Chun, W. Differential Patterns of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Variability in Major Depressive Disorder Treated with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 291, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, C.; Baum, S.A.; Adduru, V.R.; Biswal, B.B.; Michael, A.M. Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Resting State FMRI. Neuroimage 2018, 183, 907–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Long, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chan, C.K.Y.; Wu, G.; Xue, Z.; Pan, Y.; Chen, X.; Huang, X.; Li, D.; Pu, W. Altered Temporal Variability of Local and Large-Scale Resting-State Brain Functional Connectivity Patterns in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sun, J.; Liu, Z.; Rolls, E.T.; Chen, Q.; Yao, Y.; Yang, W.; Wei, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Feng, J.; et al. Verbal Creativity Correlates with the Temporal Variability of Brain Networks during the Resting State. Cerebr. Cortex 2019, 29, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dong, D.; Duan, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jia, X.; Li, Y.; Xin, F.; Yao, D.; Luo, C. Reconfiguration of Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Sensory and Perceptual System in Schizophrenia. Cerebr. Cortex 2019, 29, 3577–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bassett, D.S.; Wymbs, N.F.; Porter, M.A.; Mucha, P.J.; Carlson, J.M.; Grafton, S.T. Dynamic Reconfiguration of Human Brain Networks during Learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7641–7646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pedersen, M.; Zalesky, A.; Omidvarnia, A.; Jackson, G.D. Multilayer Network Switching Rate Predicts Brain Performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 13376–13381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, D.; Liu, Z.; Cao, H.; Yang, J.; Wu, Z.; Long, Y. Childhood Trauma Is Linked to Decreased Temporal Stability of Functional Brain Networks in Young Adults. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 290, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Betzel, R.F.; Satterthwaite, T.D.; Gold, J.I.; Bassett, D.S. Positive Affect, Surprise, and Fatigue Are Correlates of Network Flexibility. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, N.; Li, Y.; Guo, H.; Guo, M.; Yao, Z.; Hu, B. Altered Temporal Reachability Highlights the Role of Sensory Perception Systems in Major Depressive Disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 112, 110426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ouyang, X.; Long, Y.; Wu, Z.; Liu, D.; Liu, Z.; Huang, X. Temporal Stability of Dynamic Default Mode Network Connectivity Negatively Correlates with Suicidality in Major Depressive Disorder. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liao, W.; Li, J.; Duan, X.; Cui, Q.; Chen, H.; Chen, H. Static and Dynamic Connectomics Differentiate between Depressed Patients with and without Suicidal Ideation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018, 39, 4105–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Li, Z.; Zhao, L.; Ji, J.; Ma, B.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, M.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, Z. Temporal Grading Index of Functional Network Topology Predicts Pain Perception of Patients with Chronic Back Pain. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 899254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. de Lacy, N.; McCauley, E.; Kutz, J.N.; Calhoun, V.D. Sex-Related Differences in Intrinsic Brain Dynamism and Their Neurocognitive Correlates. Neuroimage 2019, 202, 116116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, C.; Cahill, N.D.; Arbabshirani, M.R.; White, T.; Baum, S.A.; Michael, A.M. Sex and Age Effects of Functional Connectivity in Early Adulthood. Brain Connect. 2016, 6, 700–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Tian, L.; Wang, J.; Yan, C.; He, Y. Hemisphere- and Gender-Related Differences in Small-World Brain Networks: A Resting-State Functional MRI Study. Neuroimage 2011, 54, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mao, N.; Zheng, H.; Long, Z.; Yao, L.; Wu, X. Gender Differences in Dynamic Functional Connectivity Based on Resting-State FMRI. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, (EMBS), Jeju, Korea, 11–15 July 2017; pp. 2940–2943. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cai, B.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, A.; Hu, W.; Stephen, J.M.; Wilson, T.W.; Calhoun, V.D.; Wang, Y.P. A GICA-TVGL Framework to Study Sex Differences in Resting State FMRI Dynamic Connectivity. J. Neurosci. Methods 2020, 332, 108531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, Z.; Liu, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Tao, H.; Ouyang, X.; Wu, G.; Chen, M.; Yu, M.; Zhou, L.; et al. Sex Difference in the Prevalence of Psychotic-like Experiences in Adolescents: Results from a Pooled Study of 21,248 Chinese Participants. Psychiatry Res. 2022, 317, 114894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, R.; Wang, D.; Tian, Y.; Du, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhou, H.; Chen, D.; Wang, L.; Alonzo, B.A.; Emily Wu, H.; et al. Sex Difference in Association between Insomnia and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2022, 240, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, Z.; Wang, B.; Xiang, Z.; Zou, Z.; Liu, Z.; Long, Y.; Chen, X. Increasing Trends in Mental Health Problems Among Urban Chinese Adolescents: Results from Repeated Cross-Sectional Data in Changsha 2016–2020. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xia, Y.; Chen, Q.; Shi, L.; Li, M.Z.; Gong, W.; Chen, H.; Qiu, J. Tracking the Dynamic Functional Connectivity Structure of the Human Brain across the Adult Lifespan. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019, 40, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Marusak, H.A.; Calhoun, V.D.; Brown, S.; Crespo, L.M.; Sala-Hamrick, K.; Gotlib, I.H.; Thomason, M.E. Dynamic Functional Connectivity of Neurocognitive Networks in Children. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2017, 38, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Qin, J.; Chen, S.G.; Hu, D.; Zeng, L.L.; Fan, Y.M.; Chen, X.P.; Shen, H. Predicting Individual Brain Maturity Using Dynamic Functional Connectivity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Tang, S.; Wu, Z.; Cao, H.; Chen, X.; Wu, G.; Tan, W.; Liu, D.; Yang, J.; Long, Y.; Liu, Z. Age-Related Decrease in Default-Mode Network Functional Connectivity Is Accelerated in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 13, 809853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hilger, K.; Fukushima, M.; Sporns, O.; Fiebach, C.J. Temporal Stability of Functional Brain Modules Associated with Human Intelligence. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2020, 41, 362–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Braun, U.; Schäfer, A.; Walter, H.; Erk, S.; Romanczuk-Seiferth, N.; Haddad, L.; Schweiger, J.I.; Grimm, O.; Heinz, A.; Tost, H.; et al. Dynamic Reconfiguration of Frontal Brain Networks during Executive Cognition in Humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11678–11683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Douw, L.; Wakeman, D.G.; Tanaka, N.; Liu, H.; Stufflebeam, S.M. State-Dependent Variability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity between Frontoparietal and Default Networks Relates to Cognitive Flexibility. Neuroscience 2016, 339, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. He, L.; Zhuang, K.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Meng, J.; Zhu, W.; Mao, Y.; Chen, Q.; Chen, X.; Qiu, J. Brain Flexibility Associated with Need for Cognition Contributes to Creative Achievement. Psychophysiology 2019, 56, e13464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, D.; Liu, X.; Long, Y.; Xiang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Bian, D.; Tang, S. Problematic Smartphone Use Is Associated with Differences in Static and Dynamic Brain Functional Connectivity in Young Adults. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 1010488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, H.; Li, L.; Li, K.; Li, P.; Xie, W.; Zeng, Y.; Kong, L.; Long, T.; Huang, L.; Liu, X.; et al. Abnormal Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in Male Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Data-Driven Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 977917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Savva, A.D.; Kassinopoulos, M.; Smyrnis, N.; Matsopoulos, G.K.; Mitsis, G.D. Effects of Motion Related Outliers in Dynamic Functional Connectivity Using the Sliding Window Method. J. Neurosci. Methods 2020, 330, 108519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hutchison, R.M.; Womelsdorf, T.; Allen, E.A.; Bandettini, P.A.; Calhoun, V.D.; Corbetta, M.; della Penna, S.; Duyn, J.H.; Glover, G.H.; Gonzalez-Castillo, J.; et al. Dynamic Functional Connectivity: Promise, Issues, and Interpretations. Neuroimage 2013, 80, 360–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Specht, K. Current Challenges in Translational and Clinical FMRI and Future Directions. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 10, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Hodkinson, D.J.; O’Daly, O.; Zunszain, P.A.; Pariante, C.M.; Lazurenko, V.; Zelaya, F.O.; Howard, M.A.; Williams, S.C.R. Circadian and Homeostatic Modulation of Functional Connectivity and Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Humans under Normal Entrained Conditions. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2014, 34, 1493–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Murphy, K.; Fox, M.D. Towards a Consensus Regarding Global Signal Regression for Resting State Functional Connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 2017, 154, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Leonardi, N.; van de Ville, D. On Spurious and Real Fluctuations of Dynamic Functional Connectivity during Rest. Neuroimage 2015, 104, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gifford, G.; Crossley, N.; Kempton, M.J.; Morgan, S.; Dazzan, P.; Young, J.; McGuire, P. Resting State FMRI Based Multilayer Network Configuration in Patients with Schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin. 2020, 25, 102169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Y.; Hu, M.; Chen, A. Aberrant Intra-Salience Network Dynamic Functional Connectivity Impairs Large-Scale Network Interactions in Schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia 2016, 93, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sheng, D.; Pu, W.; Linli, Z.; Tian, G.L.; Guo, S.; Fei, Y. Aberrant Global and Local Dynamic Properties in Schizophrenia with Instantaneous Phase Method Based on Hilbert Transform. Psychol. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Guo, S.; Zhao, W.; Tao, H.; Liu, Z.; Palaniyappan, L. The Instability of Functional Connectivity in Patients with Schizophrenia and Their Siblings: A Dynamic Connectivity Study. Schizophr. Res. 2018, 195, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hou, Z.; Kong, Y.; He, X.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Y. Increased Temporal Variability of Striatum Region Facilitating the Early Antidepressant Response in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2018, 85, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Whitfield-Gabrieli, S.; Ford, J.M. Default Mode Network Activity and Connectivity in Psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 8, 49–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wise, T.; Marwood, L.; Perkins, A.M.; Herane-Vives, A.; Joules, R.; Lythgoe, D.J.; Luh, W.M.; Williams, S.C.R.; Young, A.H.; Cleare, A.J.; et al. Instability of Default Mode Network Connectivity in Major Depression: A Two-Sample Confirmation Study. Transl. Psychiatry 2017, 7, e1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Demirtaş, M.; Tornador, C.; Falcón, C.; López-Solà, M.; Hernández-Ribas, R.; Pujol, J.; Menchón, J.M.; Ritter, P.; Cardoner, N.; Soriano-Mas, C.; et al. Dynamic Functional Connectivity Reveals Altered Variability in Functional Connectivity among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016, 37, 2918–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Tian, S.; Zhang, S.; Mo, Z.; Chattun, M.R.; Wang, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhu, R.; Shao, J.; Wang, X.; Yao, Z.; et al. Antidepressants Normalize Brain Flexibility Associated with Multi-Dimensional Symptoms in Major Depressive Patients. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2020, 100, 109866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Han, S.; Cui, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, L.; Li, D.; He, Z.; Guo, X.; Fan, Y.S.; Guo, J.; Sheng, W.; et al. Resting State Functional Network Switching Rate Is Differently Altered in Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2020, 41, 3295–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Chen, X.; Lu, B.; Yan, C.G. Reproducibility of R-FMRI Metrics on the Impact of Different Strategies for Multiple Comparison Correction and Sample Sizes. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018, 39, 300–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Tan, W.; Ouyang, X.; Huang, D.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Z.; He, Z.; Long, Y. Disrupted Intrinsic Functional Brain Network in Patients with Late-Life Depression: Evidence from a Multi-Site Dataset. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 323, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Nguyen, T.T.; Kovacevic, S.; Dev, S.I.; Lu, K.; Liu, T.T.; Eyler, L.T. Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Bipolar Disorder Is Associated with Executive Function and Processing Speed: A Preliminary Study. Neuropsychology 2017, 31, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Liang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, W.; Shen, Y.; Xue, F.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z. Disturbances of Dynamic Function in Patients With Bipolar Disorder I and Its Relationship With Executive-Function Deficit. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 537981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, H.; Jia, Y.; Zheng, S.; Zhong, S.; Chen, G.; Huang, L.; Huang, R. Abnormal Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in Unmedicated Bipolar and Major Depressive Disorders Based on the Triple-Network Model. Psychol. Med. 2020, 50, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Luo, Z.; Chen, G.; Jia, Y.; Zhong, S.; Gong, J.; Chen, F.; Wang, J.; Qi, Z.; Liu, X.; Huang, L.; et al. Shared and Specific Dynamics of Brain Segregation and Integration in Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 280, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yang, J.; Ouyang, X.; Tao, H.; Pu, W.; Fan, Z.; Zeng, C.; Huang, X.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Liu, Z.; et al. Connectomic Signatures of Working Memory Deficits in Depression, Mania, and Euthymic States of Bipolar Disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 274, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Harlalka, V.; Bapi, R.S.; Vinod, P.K.; Roy, D. Atypical Flexibility in Dynamic Functional Connectivity Quantifies the Severity in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Huang, X.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, D.; Huang, D.; Long, Y. Acute Effect of Betel Quid Chewing on Brain Network Dynamics: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 701420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Braun, U.; Schäfer, A.; Bassett, D.S.; Rausch, F.; Schweiger, J.I.; Bilek, E.; Erk, S.; Romanczuk-Seiferth, N.; Grimm, O.; Geiger, L.S.; et al. Dynamic Brain Network Reconfiguration as a Potential Schizophrenia Genetic Risk Mechanism Modulated by NMDA Receptor Function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12568–12573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Gama Marques, J.; Ouakinin, S. Schizophrenia-Schizoaffective-Bipolar Spectra: An Epistemological Perspective. CNS Spectr. 2021, 26, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Marques, J.G.; Arantes-Gonçalves, F. A Perspective on a Possible Relation between the Psychopathology of the Schizophrenia/Schizoaffective Spectrum and Unconjugated Bilirubin: A Longitudinal Protocol Study. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Du, Y.; Pearlson, G.D.; Lin, D.; Sui, J.; Chen, J.; Salman, M.; Tamminga, C.A.; Ivleva, E.I.; Sweeney, J.A.; Keshavan, M.S.; et al. Identifying Dynamic Functional Connectivity Biomarkers Using GIG-ICA: Application to Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Psychotic Bipolar Disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2017, 38, 2683–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Du, Y.; Hao, H.; Wang, S.; Pearlson, G.D.; Calhoun, V.D. Identifying Commonality and Specificity across Psychosis Sub-Groups via Classification Based on Features from Dynamic Connectivity Analysis. Neuroimage Clin. 2020, 27, 102284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Marques, J.G. Organic Psychosis Causing Secondary Schizophrenia in One-Fourth of a Cohort of 200 Patients Previously Diagnosed With Primary Schizophrenia. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 2020, 22, 19m02549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Long, Y.; Ouyang, X.; Liu, Z.; Chen, X.; Hu, X.; Lee, E.; Chen, E.Y.H.; Pu, W.; Shan, B.; Rohrbaugh, R.M. Associations among Suicidal Ideation, White Matter Integrity and Cognitive Deficit in First-Episode Schizophrenia. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Madjirova, N.P.; Petrova, N.S.; Delchev, N.K. Daily Rhythmicity of Temperature, Pulse and Blood Pressure in Schizophrenic Patients. Schizophr Res. 1995, 14, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Madjirova, N.P.; Tashev, T.G.; Delchev, N.N.; Bakalova, R.G. Interrelationship between Cortisol Levels in Plasma and the Circadian Rhythm of Temperature, Pulse and Blood Pressure in Depressed Patients with Good and Disturbed Sleep. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1995, 20, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brainsci 13 00429 g001 550
Figure 1. A summary of the steps for constructing dynamic networks and estimating the temporal stability of brain networks, and the relationships between temporal stability and other brain network measures. Note that lines with different colors represent time series of different brain nodes (different brain regions).
Figure 1. A summary of the steps for constructing dynamic networks and estimating the temporal stability of brain networks, and the relationships between temporal stability and other brain network measures. Note that lines with different colors represent time series of different brain nodes (different brain regions).
Brainsci 13 00429 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Long, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z. Temporal Stability of the Dynamic Resting-State Functional Brain Network: Current Measures, Clinical Research Progress, and Future Perspectives. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030429

AMA Style

Long Y, Liu X, Liu Z. Temporal Stability of the Dynamic Resting-State Functional Brain Network: Current Measures, Clinical Research Progress, and Future Perspectives. Brain Sciences. 2023; 13(3):429. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030429

Chicago/Turabian Style

Long, Yicheng, Xiawei Liu, and Zhening Liu. 2023. "Temporal Stability of the Dynamic Resting-State Functional Brain Network: Current Measures, Clinical Research Progress, and Future Perspectives" Brain Sciences 13, no. 3: 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030429

APA Style

Long, Y., Liu, X., & Liu, Z. (2023). Temporal Stability of the Dynamic Resting-State Functional Brain Network: Current Measures, Clinical Research Progress, and Future Perspectives. Brain Sciences, 13(3), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030429

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop