Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Modality and Task Complexity on Cognitive Workload: An fNIRS Study
Previous Article in Journal
Neutral Position or Contralateral Head Rotation in Vagus Nerve Stimulation Surgery: A Study of Surgical Pathway and Nervus Vagus Position with Peroperative Ultrasonography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Outcomes of Blood Transfusions in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of 47,835 Patients

by
Ankita Jain
1,2,†,
Eseiwi Aifuwa
1,†,
Raphael Bienenstock
1,
Shayna Kar
3,
Eris Spirollari
1,2,
Ariel Sacknovitz
1,2,
Elad Mashiach
2,
Feliks Koyfman
3,
Ji Chong
3,
Chaitanya Medicherla
3,
Chirag D. Gandhi
1,2 and
Fawaz Al-Mufti
1,3,*
1
School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
3
Department of Neurology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(4), 386; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15040386
Submission received: 1 March 2025 / Revised: 27 March 2025 / Accepted: 31 March 2025 / Published: 8 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Despite advances, large vessel occlusion strokes (LVO) remain associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have suggested that blood transfusions may help manage critically ill LVO patients. We sought to evaluate the patient characteristics, complications, and clinical outcomes associated with blood transfusions in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Methods: A query of the 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample was conducted to identify AIS patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy, using International Classification of Disease 10th Revision diagnostic codes. Demographic, clinical characteristics, severity of presentation, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to assess complications, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality. Results: A total of 47,835 AIS patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy were identified. Of these patients, 1215 (2.5%) received blood transfusions. After controlling for age, gender, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and location of stroke, blood transfusions were significant positive predictors for higher rates of inpatient death (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.681, 2.286; p < 0.001), lower rates of routine discharge (OR: 0.425; 95% CI: 0.342, 0.527; p < 0.001), and prolonged LOS (OR: 2.928; 95% CI: 2.572, 3.333; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Blood transfusions in AIS patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy are associated with elevated complication rates, extended hospital stays, and increased mortality, even after for controlling for predictors of poor outcome. Understanding the broader effects of blood transfusions in AIS patients is essential to ensure that the balance between potential benefits and risks upholds best care practice for all patients.

1. Introduction

Large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulting in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a critical and prevalent condition, significantly contributing to the overall burden of stroke in the United States. In 2019, strokes accounted for 5.26% of all deaths in the United States [1]. LVO strokes comprise up to 38% of AIS, resulting in larger infarct size, increased presenting severity, and poorer long-term outcomes, compared to non-LVO AIS [2,3]. Common causes of LVO-induced AIS include large artery atherosclerosis and cardioembolism [4,5].
With strong potential for significant morbidity and mortality in the setting of LVO stroke, management of this condition focuses on swift restoration of blood flow to minimize ischemic time and improve outcomes. Initial treatment typically involves intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or tenecteplase [6]. However, the effectiveness of these thrombolytics in LVO stroke is limited, with successful recanalization rates ranging from 8% to 32% [7]. Mechanical thrombectomy, otherwise known as endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), offers significant benefits in the treatment of LVO and can be performed up to 24 h from the last known well in select patients [8]. Combining timely thrombolytic administration with EVT represents the current standard of care, enhancing recovery and mitigating the long-term impact of LVO strokes.
Recent literature on large-vessel AIS has suggested that blood transfusions may play a role in managing AIS. Concomitant anemia is found in 40% of AIS patients, and AIS patients presenting with anemia have a 15.2% increase in risk of mortality compared to those without anemia [9]. As a result, ensuring blood homeostasis through transfusions may be a valuable strategy to maintain cerebral perfusion and prevent progression and complications in patients experiencing AIS. Furthermore, previous animal studies demonstrated that transfusing fresh, nonischemic blood markedly reduced infarct size and neurologic deficits, and provided platelets that helped maintain microvascular integrity and decreased the risk of adverse tPA-associated hemorrhage [10,11]. However, there is limited literature addressing the direct impact of blood transfusions on post-stroke morbidity and mortality in human subjects. This population-based, cross-sectional study explores patient characteristics, complications, and outcomes of blood transfusions in LVO-induced AIS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source and Patient Selection

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, created for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project by the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality, was utilized for this study. The NIS is the largest, all-payer inpatient database in the United States. It is a stratified discharge database encompassing data from 4550 hospitals across 48 states, representing 20% of all inpatient admissions and over 7 million hospital stays annually [12]. NIS was queried from 2016–2019 for patients with AIS using International Classification of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes. Patients were further stratified to those undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Since NIS does not contain any identifying patient information, approval from an institutional review board was not required for this study.

2.2. Data Characteristics and Outcome Measures

Demographics and clinical characteristics—including patient age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities, risk factors, and insurance status—were analyzed for AIS patients who received blood transfusions during their inpatient admission and those who did not. Severity of presentation, complications during admission, and other sequelae, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), acute kidney injury (AKI), aphasia, hemiplegia, herniation, coma, seizure, cerebral edema, requirement of tracheostomy, and requirement of mechanical ventilation, were assessed. The primary outcome measures examined were prolonged length of stay (≥6 days; LOS), discharge disposition, and inpatient death.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s Chi-square test. A multivariate binary logistic regression was conducted to assess the outcomes of complications, prolonged LOS, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality. The regression analysis controlled for age, gender, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and location of stroke. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (V. 28; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

A total of 47,835 AIS patients who underwent EVT were identified. Of these patients, 1215 (2.5%) received blood transfusions. Of the AIS patients who received blood transfusions, 66.7% were female (OR: 1.932; 95% CI: 1.712, 2.179; p < 0.001), 66.3% were Caucasian (OR: 0.957; 95% CI: 0.848, 1.079; p = 0.477), and 53.1% were in the lower 50th percentile median income (OR: 1.023; 95% CI: 0.913, 1.147; p = 0.705) (Table 1).

3.1. Complications

Patients who received blood transfusions had higher rates of DVT (OR: 1.635; 95% CI: 1.279, 2.092; p < 0.001), AKI (OR: 2.519; 95% CI: 2.218, 2.862; p < 0.001), cerebral edema (OR: 1.538; 95% CI 1.353, 1.748; p < 0.001), cerebral herniation (OR: 2.381; 95% CI: 2.028, 2.796; p < 0.001), requirement of tracheostomy (OR: 5.13; 95% CI: 4.205, 6.259; p < 0.001), and requirement of mechanical ventilation (OR: 2.648; 95% CI: 2.326, 3.014; p < 0.001), compared to patients who did not receive blood transfusions. The rate of coma was not significantly different between patients who received blood transfusions and those who did not (OR: 1.041; 95% CI: 0.918, 1.18; p = 0.539). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the rates of aphasia (OR: 0.972; 95% CI: 0.867, 1.09; p = 0.642), PE (OR: 1.276; 95% CI: 0.853, 1.909; p = 0.249) or hemiplegia (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.993, 1.354; p = 0.064) between the two groups. However, the rate of seizure was lower in AIS patients who received blood transfusions (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.466, 0.879; p = 0.006) compared to patients who did not (Table 2).

3.2. Outcomes

AIS patients with EVT receiving blood transfusions were more likely to experience prolonged LOS (OR: 3.389; 95% CI: 2.989, 3.842; p < 0.001), transfer to a skilled nursing facility (OR: 1.163; 95% CI: 1.036, 1.306; p = 0.01), and inpatient death (OR: 1.563; 95% CI: 1.492, 1.638; p < 0.001) compared to AIS patients who did not receive blood transfusions (Table 3). Furthermore, rates of routine discharge (OR: 0.342; 95% CI: 0.279, 0.418; p < 0.001) were decreased in those receiving blood transfusions. There was no significant difference in the rates of home health care (OR: 0.991; 95% CI: 0.816, 1.203; p = 0.961) or transferring patients to a short-term hospital (OR: 1.024; 95% CI: 0.744, 1.409; p = 0.934). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, blood transfusions in AIS patients were independent positive predictors for higher rates of inpatient death (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.681, 2.286; p < 0.001), lower rates of routine discharge (OR: 0.425; 95% CI: 0.342, 0.527; p < 0.001), and prolonged LOS (OR: 2.928; 95% CI: 2.572, 3.333; p < 0.001) (Table 4).

4. Discussion

This study is the first of its kind to analyze the clinical outcomes of blood transfusions in patients undergoing EVT for LVO stroke. We found that patients who received blood transfusions were more likely to be female (OR: 1.932; 95% CI: 1.712, 2.179; p < 0.001) and have a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (6.2646 ± 2.00033; p < 0.001) compared to patients who did not receive blood transfusion. Notably, after controlling for age, gender, NIHSS scores, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and location of stroke, blood transfusions were positive predictors for prolonged LOS (OR: 2.928; 95% CI: 2.572, 3.333; p < 0.001) and higher rates of inpatient death (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.681, 2.286; p < 0.001).
We investigated LOS as one of several complications examined in AIS patients receiving EVT and blood transfusions. The current findings align with those of a previous retrospective cohort study that compared the outcomes of patients with various acute brain injury subtypes who received blood transfusions with those who did not [13]. The study analyzed outcomes in 1142 patients with AIS and found that, among the 67 patients who received blood transfusions, there was a significant increase in LOS compared to patients who did not receive blood transfusions. An additional retrospective study demonstrated that transfused patients at similar hemoglobin levels of 7–9 g/dL had longer ICU (8 vs. 3.5 days; p < 0.001) and hospital stays (20 vs. 11 days; p < 0.001) [14]. A separate retrospective cohort study found that patients who were transfused a single unit of red blood cells were more likely to have an increased LOS and had 1.42 times higher odds of 28-day readmission (95% CI: 1.20–1.69; p < 0.001) [15]. The results of the current study corroborate and expand on previous findings that blood transfusions are associated with increased LOS in AIS patients. This study emphasizes the need for greater attention to various markers and conditions in these patients, so as to proactively optimize their care and potentially limit LOS and other complications.
This study found an increased mortality rate for AIS patients who were treated with EVT and blood transfusions. A recent worldwide audit of ICU and hospital outcomes in critically ill patients found that hospital mortality rates were higher in transfused patients compared to non-transfused patients (30.0% vs. 19.6%; p < 0.001) [16]. It was also demonstrated that the mortality rate increased with increasing numbers of transfused units [16]. The PATCH trial observed the relationship between platelet transfusion and mortality in patients who experienced acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage. This trial found that the odds of dependence or death at three months were higher in the platelet transfusion group than in the standard care group (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.18, 3.56; p = 0.0114) [17]. This contradicts prior animal studies that demonstrated that blood and platelet transfusions helped protect neuro-vasculature and decreased the risk tPA-associated hemorrhage [10,11]. In addition, a previous observational retrospective study found that patients who received transfusions in cardiac surgery also suffered from increased mortality. The transfusion of unidentified pro-inflammatory cytokines in the blood samples could exacerbate tissue ischemia [18]. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that blood transfusions are associated with electrolyte disturbances, volume overload, and transfusion reactions [19,20,21]. These outcomes emphasize the importance of careful evaluation of the necessity and timing of blood transfusions in AIS patients to effectively balance the benefits and risks of transfusion.
It is important to recognize that the necessity for blood transfusions in AIS patients undergoing EVT is often associated with a generally worse condition of the patients and a higher likelihood of serious complications. As such, the correlative relationship between blood transfusions and worse clinical outcomes in these patients needs to be interpreted with caution. The need for blood transfusions in AIS patients receiving EVT may indicate more severe underlying conditions in the patients, as opposed to direct contribution to poor clinical outcomes.

Limitations

Several limitations are inherent to the utilization of the NIS database. The use of ICD-10 codes to identify patient cohorts and outcomes can introduce variability and potential misclassification, due to inconsistent coding practices across hospitals. However, this study sought to mitigate further heterogeneity and errors by focusing the analysis on 2016–2019, thus avoiding the shift from ICD-9 to ICD-10 coding that occurred in 2015. Additionally, the NIS lacks detailed clinical data—such as specifics of transfusion practices, recanalization measurement, procedure-related hemorrhagic complications, etc.—which may affect the interpretation of outcomes. For example, estimated blood loss during each EVT procedure is not reported in the NIS database, which could impact the overall necessity of a blood transfusion. Furthermore, the NIS does not provide long-term follow-up data, restricting the analysis to in-hospital outcomes and preventing assessment of long-term morbidity and mortality. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the findings of this study and to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of blood transfusions on AIS patients undergoing EVT.

5. Conclusions

This population-based, retrospective study found that blood transfusions in the setting of AIS patients undergoing EVT are associated with higher rates of complications, prolonged hospital stays, and increased inpatient mortality. These findings highlight the importance of weighing the potential advantages and disadvantages of blood transfusion when managing AIS patients undergoing EVT. Ultimately, these findings warrant a careful reevaluation of blood transfusion practices in the management of AIS as understanding the critical interplay between intervention and outcome may inform the difference between recovery and fatality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A.-M.; methodology, F.A.-M., A.J., E.A. and E.S.; formal analysis, A.J., E.A., R.B., S.K. and E.S.; investigation, A.J., E.A., R.B., S.K. and E.S.; data curation, A.J., E.A., R.B., S.K. and E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.J., E.A., R.B., S.K., E.S., A.S., E.M., F.K., J.C., C.M., C.D.G. and F.A.-M.; writing—review and editing, A.J., E.A., R.B., S.K., E.S., A.S., E.M., F.K., J.C., C.M., C.D.G. and F.A.-M.; visualization, F.A.-M., A.J. and E.A.; supervision, F.A.-M., A.J. and E.A.; project administration, A.J. and E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Since the NIS is publicly available and contains no identifiable information, approval by an institutional review board was not required for this study.

Informed Consent Statement

Since the NIS is publicly available and contains no identifiable information, informed consent was not required for this study.

Data Availability Statement

This study data can be requested from the corresponding author after completing the required procedures outlined by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no known potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
LVOLarge Vessel Occlusion
AISAcute Ischemic Stroke
tPATissue Plasminogen Activator
EVTEndovascular Thrombectomy
NISNational Inpatient Sample
ICDInternational Classification of Disease
DVTDeep Vein Thrombosis
PEPulmonary Embolism
AKIAcute Kidney Injury
LOSLength of Stay
NIHSSNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

References

  1. Tsao, C.W.; Aday, A.W.; Almarzooq, Z.I.; Alonso, A.; Beaton, A.Z.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Boehme, A.K.; Buxton, A.E.; Carson, A.P.; Commodore-Mensah, Y.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022, 145, e153–e639. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Sweid, A.; Hammoud, B.; Ramesh, S.; Wong, D.; Alexander, T.D.; Weinberg, J.H.; Deprince, M.; Dougherty, J.; Maamari, D.J.-M.; Tjoumakaris, S.; et al. Acute ischaemic stroke interventions: Large vessel occlusion and beyond. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2020, 5, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Malhotra, K.; Gornbein, J.; Saver, J.L. Ischemic Strokes Due to Large-Vessel Occlusions Contribute Disproportionately to Stroke-Related Dependence and Death: A Review. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pirson, F.A.V.A.; Boodt, N.; Brouwer, J.; Bruggeman, A.A.E.; Hinsenveld, W.H.; Staals, J.; van Zwam, W.H.; van der Leij, C.; Brans, R.J.B.; Majoie, C.B.L.M. Etiology of Large Vessel Occlusion Posterior Circulation Stroke: Results of the MR CLEAN Registry. Stroke 2022, 53, 2468–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hendrix, P.; Sofoluke, N.; Adams, M.D.; Kunaprayoon, S.; Zand, R.; Kolinovsky, A.N.; Person, T.N.; Gupta, M.; Goren, O.; Schirmer, C.M.; et al. Risk Factors for Acute Ischemic Stroke Caused by Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion. Stroke 2019, 50, 1074–1080. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Zhu, A.; Rajendram, P.; Tseng, E.; Coutts, S.B.; Yu, A.Y. Alteplase or tenecteplase for thrombolysis in ischemic stroke: An illustrated review. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2022, 6, e12795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leslie-Mazwi, T.M.; Chandra, R.V.; Hirsch, J.A. To tPA or Not to tPA, That Is the Question. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2017, 38, 1464–1466. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Inoue, M.; Yoshimoto, T.; Tanaka, K.; Koge, J.; Shiozawa, M.; Nishii, T.; Ohta, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Satow, T.; Kataoka, H.; et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy Up to 24 Hours in Large Vessel Occlusions and Infarct Velocity Assessment. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e022880. [Google Scholar]
  9. Desai, A.; Oh, D.; Rao, E.M.; Sahoo, S.; Mahajan, U.V.; Labak, C.M.; Mauria, R.; Shah, V.S.; Nguyen, Q.; Herring, E.Z.; et al. Impact of anemia on acute ischemic stroke outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0280025. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ren, X.; Hu, H.; Farooqi, I.; Simpkins, J.W. Blood substitution therapy rescues the brain of mice from ischemic damage. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4078. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Luo, H.; Wei, L.; Lu, L.; Kang, L.; Cao, Y.; Yang, X.; Bai, X.; Fan, W.; Zhao, B.-Q. Transfusion of Resting Platelets Reduces Brain Hemorrhage After Intracerebral Hemorrhage and tPA-Induced Hemorrhage After Cerebral Ischemia. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 338. [Google Scholar]
  12. Introduction to the HCUP National Inpatient Sample (NIS). 2018. Available online: https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2018.jsp (accessed on 10 September 2024).
  13. Moman, R.N.; Kor, D.J.; Chandran, A.; Hanson, A.C.; Schroeder, D.R.; Rabinstein, A.A.; Warner, M.A. Red blood cell transfusion in acute brain injury subtypes: An observational cohort study. J. Crit. Care 2019, 50, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Naderi-Boldaji, V.; Zand, F.; Asmarian, N.; Banifatemi, M.; Masjedi, M.; Sabetian, G.; Ouhadian, M.; Bayati, N.; Saeedizadeh, H.; Naderi, N.; et al. Does red blood cell transfusion affect clinical outcomes in critically ill patients? A report from a large teaching hospital in south Iran. Ann. Saudi Med. 2024, 44, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Trentino, K.M.; Leahy, M.F.; Erber, W.N.; Mace, H.; Symons, K.; Budgeon, C.A.; Murray, K. Hospital-Acquired Infection, Length of Stay, and Readmission in Elective Surgery Patients Transfused 1 Unit of Red Blood Cells: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesth. Analg. 2022, 135, 586–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vincent, J.-L.; Jaschinski, U.; Wittebole, X.; Lefrant, J.-Y.; Jakob, S.M.; Almekhlafi, G.A.; Pellis, T.; Tripathy, S.; Birri, P.N.R.; Sakr, Y. Worldwide audit of blood transfusion practice in critically ill patients. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Baharoglu, M.I.; Cordonnier, C.; Al-Shahi Salman, R.; de Gans, K.; Koopman, M.M.; Brand, A.; Majoie, C.B.; Beenen, L.F.; A Marquering, H.; Vermeulen, M.; et al. Platelet transfusion versus standard care after acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy (PATCH): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2016, 387, 2605–2613. [Google Scholar]
  18. Murphy, G.J.; Reeves, B.C.; Rogers, C.A.; Rizvi, S.I.; Culliford, L.; Angelini, G.D. Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity, and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation 2007, 116, 2544–2552. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Sihler, K.C.; Napolitano, L.M. Complications of massive transfusion. Chest. 2010, 137, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Raval, J.S.; Griggs, J.R.; Fleg, A. Blood Product Transfusion in Adults: Indications, Adverse Reactions, and Modifications. Am Fam Physician 2020, 102, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Perrotta, P.L.; Snyder, E.L. Non-infectious complications of transfusion therapy. Blood Rev. 2001, 15, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Baseline demographics and comorbidities of patients undergoing EVT for AIS stratified by blood transfusion status.
Table 1. Baseline demographics and comorbidities of patients undergoing EVT for AIS stratified by blood transfusion status.
VariablesTotal
Cohort (47,835)
Non-Blood Transfusion
(46,620, 97.5%)
Blood
Transfusion
(1215, 2.5%)
Blood Transfusion
OR (CI 95%)p-Value
Demographics
Female24,525 (51.3%)23,715 (50.9%)810 (66.7%)1.932 (1.712, 2.179)<0.001
Lower 50th
Percentile
Median Income
25,125 (52.5%)24,480 (52.5%)645 (53.1%)1.023 (0.913, 1.147)0.705
Private Insurance10,920 (22.8%)10,630 (22.8%)290 (23.9%)1.061 (0.929, 1.213)0.387
Medicare Insurance29,285 (61.2%)28,570 (61.3%)715 (58.8%)0.903 (0.805, 1.014)0.089
Medicaid Insurance4610 (9.6%)4460 (9.6%)150 (12.3%)1.331 (1.119, 1.584)0.001
White Race32,150 (67.2%)31,345 (67.2%)805 (66.3%)0.957 (0.848, 1.079)0.477
Comorbidities
Diabetes Mellitus13,005 (27.2%)12,695 (27.2%)310 (25.5%)0.915 (0.803, 1.043)0.191
Hypertension25,000 (52.3%)24,500 (52.6%)500 (41.2%)0.631 (0.562, 0.709)<0.001
Hyperlipidemia23,440 (49%)22,970 (49.3%)470 (38.7%)0.65 (0.578, 0.73)<0.001
Obesity4755 (9.9%)4660 (10%)95 (7.8%)0.764 (0.618, 0.944)0.013
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease5565 (11.6%)5415 (11.6%)150 (12.3%)1.072 (0.901, 1.274)0.441
Congestive
Heart Failure
2330 (4.9%)2255 (4.8%)75 (6.2%)1.294 (1.021, 1.641)0.036
Smoker Status9140 (19.1%)8965 (19.2%)175 (14.4%)0.707 (0.601, 0.831)<0.001
Alcohol
Abuse Disorder
2670 (5.6%)2590 (5.6%)80 (6.6%)1.198 (0.952, 1.508)0.128
Chronic Anticoagulant/
Antiplatelet Use
8920 (18.6%)8725 (18.7%)195 (16%)0.83 (0.711, 0.969)0.019
Intravascular Thrombolytics11,040 (23.1%)10,810 (23.2%)230 (18.9%)0.774 (0.669–0.894)0.001
Patients with
Stroke
Location Identified
Posterior Circulation Stroke43,205 (90.3%)42,100 (90.3%)1105 (90.9%)1.079 (0.884–1.315)0.462
Anterior Circulation Stroke3160 (6.6%)3080 (6.6%)80 (6.6%)0.996 (0.792–1.254)1
VariablesTotal
Cohort Mean
(St. Dv.)
Non-Blood Transfusion
Mean (St. Dv.)
Blood
Transfusion
Mean (St. Dv.)
p-Value
Age68.86 (±14.839)68.85 (±14.841)69.35 (±14.789)0.240
Elixhauser Comorbidity Index5.2785 (±1.88642)5.2554 (±1.87780)6.2646 (±2.00033)<0.001
NIHSS15.8003 (±7.60538)15.7706 (±7.61439)16.9383 (±7.16195)<0.001
NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score.
Table 2. Hospital course of patients undergoing EVT for AIS stratified by blood transfusion status.
Table 2. Hospital course of patients undergoing EVT for AIS stratified by blood transfusion status.
VariablesTotal
Cohort
(47,835)
Non-Blood Transfusion
(46,620, 97.5%)
Blood
Transfusion
(1215, 2.5%)
Blood Transfusion
OR (CI 95%)p-Value
DVT1750 (3.7%)1680 (3.6%)70 (5.8%)1.635 (1.279, 2.092)<0.001
PE780 (1.6%)755 (1.6%)25 (2.1%)1.276 (0.853, 1.909)0.249
AKI6685 (14%)6340 (13.6%)345 (28.4%)2.519 (2.218, 2.862)<0.001
Tracheostomy1095 (2.3%)975 (2.1%)120 (9.9%)5.13 (4.205, 6.259)<0.001
Aphasia24,935 (52.1%)24,310 (52.1%)625 (51.4%)0.972 (0.867, 1.09)0.642
Hemiplegia39,180 (81.9%)38,160 (81.9%)1020 (84%)1.16 (0.993, 1.354)0.064
Herniation3455 (7.2%)3270 (7%)185 (15.2%)2.381 (2.028, 2.796)<0.001
Coma13,400 (28%)13,050 (28%)350 (28.8%)1.041 (0.918, 1.18)0.539
Mechanical Ventilation6085 (12.7%)5755 (12.3%)330 (27.2%)2.648 (2.326, 3.014)<0.001
Seizure2395 (5%)2355 (5.1%)40 (3.3%)0.64 (0.466, 0.879)0.006
Cerebral Edema9585 (20%)9250 (19.8%)335 (27.6%)1.538 (1.353, 1.748)<0.001
DVT = Deep Vein Thrombosis; PE = Pulmonary Embolism; AKI = Acute Kidney Injury.
Table 3. Outcomes of patients undergoing EVT for AIS stratified by blood transfusion status.
Table 3. Outcomes of patients undergoing EVT for AIS stratified by blood transfusion status.
VariablesTotal
Cohort
(47,835)
Non-Blood Transfusion
(46,620, 97.5%)
Blood
Transfusion
(1215, 2.5%)
Blood Transfusion
OR (CI 95%)p-Value
Prolonged Length of Stay > 6 Days20,525 (42.9%)19,660 (42.2%)865 (71.2%)3.389 (2.989–3.842)<0.001
Routine Discharge10,210 (21.3%)10,105 (21.7%)105 (8.6%)0.342 (0.279–0.418)<0.001
Home Health Care4565 (9.5%)4450 (9.5%)115 (9.5%)0.991 (0.816–1.203)0.961
Transfer to Short Term Hospital1540 (3.2%)1500 (3.2%)40 (3.3%)1.024 (0.744–1.409)0.934
Transfer to Skilled Nursing Facility26,220 (54.8%)25,510 (54.7%)710 (58.4%)1.163 (1.036–1.306)0.01
Leave
Against
Medical Advice
130 (0.3%)130 (0.3%)0 (0%)0.997 (0.997–0.998)0.084
Inpatient Death40,745 (22%)38,055 (21.6%)2690 (30.1%)1.563 (1.492–1.638)<0.001
VariablesTotal
Cohort Mean
(St. Dv.)
Non-Blood
Transfusion Mean
(St. Dv.)
Blood
Transfusion Mean
(St. Dv.)
p-Value
Length of Stay8.01 (±9.016)7.82 (±14.098)15.19 (±18.572)<0.001
Total Charges193,262.15 (±158,504.767)190,477.39 (±153,188.438)302,633.31 (±279,289.332)<0.001
Table 4. Independent predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
Table 4. Independent predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
Variables *Inpatient DeathRoutine DischargeProlonged Length of Stay > 6 Days
OR
(CI 95%)
p-ValueOR
(CI 95%)
p-ValueOR (CI 95%)p-Value
Blood Transfusion1.96
(1.68–2.286)
<0.0010.425
(0.342–0.527)
<0.0012.928
(2.572–3.333)
<0.001
* Multivariate logistic regression controlling for age, gender, NIHSS, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and location of stroke.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jain, A.; Aifuwa, E.; Bienenstock, R.; Kar, S.; Spirollari, E.; Sacknovitz, A.; Mashiach, E.; Koyfman, F.; Chong, J.; Medicherla, C.; et al. Outcomes of Blood Transfusions in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of 47,835 Patients. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15040386

AMA Style

Jain A, Aifuwa E, Bienenstock R, Kar S, Spirollari E, Sacknovitz A, Mashiach E, Koyfman F, Chong J, Medicherla C, et al. Outcomes of Blood Transfusions in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of 47,835 Patients. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(4):386. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15040386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jain, Ankita, Eseiwi Aifuwa, Raphael Bienenstock, Shayna Kar, Eris Spirollari, Ariel Sacknovitz, Elad Mashiach, Feliks Koyfman, Ji Chong, Chaitanya Medicherla, and et al. 2025. "Outcomes of Blood Transfusions in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of 47,835 Patients" Brain Sciences 15, no. 4: 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15040386

APA Style

Jain, A., Aifuwa, E., Bienenstock, R., Kar, S., Spirollari, E., Sacknovitz, A., Mashiach, E., Koyfman, F., Chong, J., Medicherla, C., Gandhi, C. D., & Al-Mufti, F. (2025). Outcomes of Blood Transfusions in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of 47,835 Patients. Brain Sciences, 15(4), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15040386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop