Next Article in Journal
Serum Vitamin D Is Associated with Antioxidant Potential in Peri-Parturient Cows
Previous Article in Journal
Fruit of Gardenia jasminoides Induces Mitochondrial Activation and Non-Shivering Thermogenesis through Regulation of PPARγ
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oxidative-Stress-Induced Cellular Toxicity and Glycoxidation of Biomolecules by Cosmetic Products under Sunlight Exposure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antioxidant Role of Kaempferol in Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

1
Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Noida 201313, Uttar Pradesh, India
2
Amity Institute of Molecular Medicine & Stem Cell Research, Amity University, Noida 201313, Uttar Pradesh, India
3
Medical Laboratory Department, Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(9), 1419; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091419
Submission received: 14 June 2021 / Revised: 2 September 2021 / Accepted: 3 September 2021 / Published: 5 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Natural Antioxidants in Free Radical Biology and Human Health)

Abstract

:
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are noxious to cells because their increased level interacts with the body’s defense mechanism. These species also cause mutations and uncontrolled cell division, resulting in oxidative stress (OS). Prolonged oxidative stress is responsible for incorrect protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), causing a stressful condition, ER stress. These cellular stresses (oxidative stress and ER stress) are well-recognized biological factors that play a prominent role in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC is a critical global health problem and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The application of anti-oxidants from herbal sources significantly reduces oxidative stress. Kaempferol (KP) is a naturally occurring, aglycone dietary flavonoid that is present in various plants (Crocus sativus, Coccinia grandis, Euphorbia pekinensis, varieties of Aloe vera, etc.) It is capable of interacting with pleiotropic proteins of the human body. Efforts are in progress to develop KP as a potential candidate to prevent HCC with no adverse effects. This review emphasizes the molecular mechanism of KP for treating HCC, targeting oxidative stress.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Kaempferol is a yellow-colored dietary flavonoid, present in numerous fruits and vegetables including apples (Malus domestica), aloe (Aloe vera), beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), broccoli (Brassica oleracea), carrot (Daucus carota), gooseberry (Ribes uva-crispa), strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa), saffron (Crocus sativus), tea (Camellia sinensis), and honey (Apis mellifera) [1,2,3,4,5]. It is a tetrahydroxyflavone that has hydroxy groups located at positions 3, 5, 7, and 40 [6]. Kaempferol and its glycosylated derivatives are found to possess cardioprotective [7], neuroprotective [8], anti-inflammatory [4], antidiabetic [9], antioxidant [10], antimicrobial, [11] and anti-cancer activities [12,13] (Figure 1). Kaempferol gets absorbed by the small intestine due to its lipophilicity [14] or either by passive absorption, facilitated diffusion, or active transport [15]. Kaempferol, being a polyphenolic neutraceutical compound, exhibits high cytotoxicity, and thus has a promising role in cancer therapy. It has been demonstrated to invoke several mechanisms in the regulation of cancer cells. Cancer prevention is largely accomplished by inducing apoptosis, inhibiting cell proliferation [16], and promoting cell cycle arrest mainly in the G2/M phase [17]. Researchers have reported that kaempferol reduces cell viability and proliferation in the lungs [18], and colorectal cancer [19]. It inhibits the cell viability in HCC in a dose- and time-dependent manner [20]. Epidemiological data showed that a good intake of kaempferol is connected with low incidences of liver cancer [21]. Encouragingly, a kaempferol-rich diet has reduced the risk of cancer in smokers [22]. It has proved to be a better candidate molecule in increasing the efficacy of other anticancer drugs. Kaempferol, in combination with sorafenib (at subtoxic concentration), enhances the efficacy of sorafenib chemotherapy [23]. It is a potent scavenger of ROS that works by reducing cellular oxidative stress [24]. It augments the antioxidant potential of normal cells via modulating heme oxygenase (HO)-1 expression and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways [25]. The HO-1 is a redox-sensitive inducible enzyme whose overexpression enhances cell resistance to oxidative injury.
Free radicals are moieties with one or more unpaired electron in atomic or molecular orbitals formed during a variety of biochemical reactions and cellular functions [26]. ROS are the active metabolites of healthy cells, which include free radicals such as superoxide (O2) and hydroxyl radical (OH), as well as nonradical species, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [27]. The sequential reduction of oxygen leads to the genesis of these species. The physiological concentration of ROS is essential in carrying out vital cellular processes including proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and cell senescence, whereas high ROS flux damages cell macromolecules including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) [28]. Therefore, the smooth conduction of all metabolic functions requires a balanced redox state. Overproduction of ROS due to endogenous (e.g., mitochondria, peroxisomes, and oxygen-handling enzymes) and exogenous reactions (e.g., UV, heavy metals, and micronutrients) or inefficient/exhausted antioxidants leads to oxidative stress [27]. It may lead to the development of various chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases [29,30], neurodegenerative diseases [31,32], allergy [33], and carcinogenesis [34].
HCC is the most lethal type of cancer, and is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide [35,36]. Risk factors such as hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), aflatoxin-contaminated food, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, obesity, alcohol abuse, smoking, and non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) are involved directly and indirectly in the pathogenesis of HCC [37,38]. Management of HCC patients depends on the stage of the tumor. Surgery is the main curative therapy for HCC, but there are very high chances of tumor recurrence in patients with HCC [39]. The treatment options comprise repeated liver resection, transarterial therapy, ablative therapy, and systemic medical therapies [40]. A recent study proposed the beneficial role of salvage liver transplant in treating HCC recurrence, but this remains controversial due to organ shortage and the overall low rate of patients that may fulfill transplant criteria at the time of recurrence [41]. Many scientists have reported the better long-term effects of redo surgery over thermoablation. Palliative treatment of HCC includes trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE), targeted molecular therapy, and systemic medical therapies such as Sorafenib treatment, etc. [42]. HCC is a multi-stage process that involves various complex pathways in its pathogenesis, including RAF/ERK/MAPK, PI3K/Akt/Mtor, Ras and JAK-STAT, Wnt- and RB1-dependent signaling cascade [43]. However, oxidative stress emerged as a key player in the development and progression of HCC [44]. Dysregulation of ROS-producing and ROS-scavenging enzymes contributes to the development of HCC leading to poor patient survival. This review summarizes the mechanism of the antioxidant potential of kaempferol in treating HCC.

2. Regulated Cell Death and Kaempferol

Regulated cell death (RCD) is beneficial in maintaining the organism’s hemostasis. Autophagy and apoptosis are the two important parts of RCD [45]. Autophagy is an evolutionary conserved cellular process targeting the damaged cells and organelles in lysosomal degradation. Autophagy is induced in response to the metabolic crisis and damaged organelles [46]. Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, governs the autonomous removal of infected and damaged cells. Activation and suppression of the two arms of RCD (apoptosis and autophagy) have been suggested as methods for curing liver cancer, including HCC [47,48,49,50]. Several hypotheses have been considered regarding the antitumor potential of kaempferol via RCD. Kaempferol is reported to induce autophagic cell death against SK-Hep1 (human hepatic cancer cell line) via AMPK and AKT signaling pathways [17]. Kaempferol inhibits cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion and induces apoptosis in HepG2 liver cancer cells by reducing the expression of miRNA [51]. Kaempferol, in combination with luteolin, induces apoptosis and causes cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase, thus preventing cell migration and invasion [14].

3. Oxidative Stress (OS) in Hepatocarcinogenesis

Various mechanisms involved in hepatocarcinogenesis include the attenuation of tumor suppressor function, oncogene activation, and oxidative stress [52].
Oxidative stress could be promoted by any dangerous or inflammatory signal which damages hepatocytes, promotes pathological polyploidization, and triggers inflammation [53]. Increased levels of ROS and oxidative stress promote genetic and epigenetic alterations which contribute to the regulation of onco-suppressor, onco-promoter, and several proinflammatory genes involved in the development of HCC [54]. Additionally, they also promote the migration, invasion, and metastasis of HCC for different etiologies [55]. More the 80-90% of HCC cases are associated with chronic hepatic inflammation, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) [56].
In the hepatocytes, ROS cause the activation of several cellular pathways including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB), phosphatidylinositol 3- kinase (PI3K), p53, b-catenin/Wnt, and angiogenesis. Notably, these pathways play a vital role in mutagenesis, tumor promotion, and progression [57], and for this reason, oxidative stress has a strong connection with hepatocarcinogenesis.

3.1. HBV and HCV Related HCC and Oxidative Stress

Chronic HBV and HCV infection are often associated with the development of cirrhosis, and HCC [58]. These unrelated viruses belong to two different viral families and exhibit strong hepatotropism, but their molecular mechanism to produce HCC is still under investigation. Some researchers have found that the viral encoded proteins alter the cellular phenotype and host gene expression, which is the hallmark of cancer [59]. HBV- and HCV-related fibrosis and chronic inflammation of the liver are induced by OS, which eventually contributes to the development of HCC. HBV infection leads to the activation of macrophages or Kupffer cells to produce proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α [60]. Irregular cytokine generation and ROS production have an influential role in hepatocarcinogenesis. The HBV genome encodes a variety of gene products, including a multifunctional HBx protein, which has carcinogenic potential. This protein promotes replication of the virus and protects the virus-infected cells from damage [61]. This process takes place in hepatocytes only, which further progresses to HCC [62].
Genetic mutations found in the samples from HBV patients have a strong correlation with the initiation and development of liver cancer [63]. Recent studies proved that the mutant genes and their products accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and promote carcinogenesis through ER stress and ROS production. On the other hand, during HCV infection, immunomodulatory molecules such as programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1) become activated, affecting inflammatory signaling pathways. Continuous inflammation leads to the development of HCC via PKR, STAT3, and TNFR pathways [64]. Moreover, serological markers and iron accumulation are usually elevated during chronic HCV infection, and excessive bivalent iron is strongly toxic, leading to the induction of Fenton’s reaction and ROS [65]. Thus, oxidative stress plays an important role in HBV- and HCV-related liver cancer development.

3.2. Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Related HCC and OS

NASH is a chronic liver injury causing steatosis, inflammation, and progressive fibrosis, ultimately leading to cirrhosis and HCC [66]. As proposed by Day and James, the pathogenesis of NASH is a two-hit theory [67]. The first hit includes the progression of steatosis, correlated with the accumulation of triglycerides in the liver cells. The second hit includes a wide variety of cellular stress factors, e.g., gut-derived stimulation, intestinal circumstances, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and ER stress, etc. [68]. Overconsumption of carbohydrates or saturated fatty acids and less polyunsaturated fatty acids leads to lipid accumulation in hepatocytes. The adipose tissues release adiponectin, resistin, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), leading to inflammation of the cells, induction of mitochondrial destruction, and ROS generation [69]. Among the above-mentioned factors, adiponectin is a fat factor that modulates cell proliferation, inhibits cancer cell growth, metastasis [70], and induces apoptosis [71]. Oxidative stress is an important process regulated by the 1L-17 protein, whose receptors are widely distributed on the surface of liver cells. Patients with an elevated level of serum IL-17 have a higher risk of early recurrence of liver cancer after surgery [72]. ROS are the metabolic by-products in hepatocytes generated due to elevated mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and inadequate mitochondrial respiratory chain activity. The ROS level tends to increase in NASH [73] and results in the disruption of hepatic fatty acid homeostasis and accumulates non-metabolized fatty acids in the cytoplasm [74]. Thus, oxidative stress is a harmful key component causing the progression of NASH to HCC. The mechanism of oxidative stress in HBV, HCV, and NASH-related HCC is summarized in Table 1.

4. Antioxidant Potential of Kaempferol in Preventing HCC

Kaempferol possesses a remarkable spectrum of pharmacological activities, including antidepressant, anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, etc. [76,77]. Researchers have indicated the antioxidant potential of kaempferol in both in vitro and in vivo models [78]. It causes the scavenging of the free radicals and other ROS molecules, as their generation transforms the normal cells into malignant ones [79]. So, inhibition of these species alters the tumor cell phenotype. Kaempferol pre-treatment of CCl4 challenged mice showed normalized activities of liver enzymes [80]. Further, kaempferol 3-O-β-d-(2,6-di-O-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl) galactopyronoside (KG) pretreatment showed improvement in the level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in the liver, indicating that KG alleviates liver injury [80], which might be due to its antioxidant properties. Kaempferol reduces liver damage in acetaminophen-treated rats by upregulating silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1). It suppresses the acetylation of all SIRT1 targets, including PARP1, p53, NF-jB, FOXO-1, and p53 that mediate antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects [81]. It also showed a hepatoprotective effect in alcohol-induced liver injury in mice by suppressing the expression of key microsomal enzyme cytochrome 2E1 (Cyp2E1) and by enhancing the protective role of the antioxidative defense system [82]. Various works citing the role of kaempferol in managing severe liver injuries are summarized in Table 2.
Several signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms have been identified that play prominent roles in reducing oxidative stress. Targeting the critical pathways which include peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) and nuclear factor erythroid related factor 2 (Nrf2) using kaempferol has shown a positive effect in relieving oxidative stress.

4.1. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR)

PPAR belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily [97]. Among the various PPAR receptors identified, PPARα and PPARγ play an important role in the regulation of lipids and glucose metabolism [98]. The subtypes of PPAR receptors have been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of HCC. Due to the increased consumption of nutrients, HCC cells experience oxygen and nutrient deficiency leading to a stressful metabolic environment [99]. PPARα acts as a master regulator of liver metabolism. Therefore, PPARα-regulated processes are involved in most liver diseases. HCC is associated with the down-regulation of PPARα receptors [99]. Thus, stimulation of PPARα is expected to treat HCC. Kaempferol, a polyphenolic compound shows the protective effect by elevating the expression of the PPARα gene and/or protein [100].

4.2. Nuclear Factor Erythroid Related Factor 2 (Nrf2)

Nrf2, a cytosolic transcription factor, is the principal regulator of cellular defense through the antioxidant machinery [101]. In normal liver cells, Nrf2 offers protective effects against oxidative stress, whereas, in the tumor cells it causes deleterious effects, encouraging the proliferation and survival of cancerous cells [102]. Under normal physiological conditions, Nrf2 and Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) orchestrate the NRF2-dependent oxidative stress response and maintain liver homeostasis. Upon continuous stress exposure, Keap 1 is degraded in the cytoplasm. Further, Nrf2 is phosphorylated and translocated to the nucleus, forming a heterodimer with transcription factor Maf. It binds to the antioxidant response element (ARE) sequence and activates the expression of endogenous antioxidants, phase II detoxifying enzymes and transporters [103]. Nrf2 can act as the potential target for managing severe cancers including HCC [101]. Thus, kaempferol can regulate the Nrf2 transcriptional pathway and reduce cell redox homeostasis, and can play a promising role in combatting cancer [14]. Figure 2 exhibits the antioxidant role of kaempferol during HCC.

5. Role of Oxidative Stress in Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Hemostasis

The ER is involved in protein folding, synthesis, and secretion [104,105]. Nutrient distress, pH imbalance, and, hypoxia perturb ER homeostasis, thus affecting the protein folding machinery and the generation of misfolded proteins [106]. The accumulation of misfolded proteins causes cellular damage and induces ER stress [107]. Prolonged ER stress activates a self-protective mechanism, the unfolded response (UPR). It reduces protein synthesis and enhances the expression of the ER molecular chaperones glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and GRP94 to facilitate the correct folding of proteins. UPR is the complex cellular response that is associated with the various membrane biosensors; protein kinase RNA (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), inositol requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) [97]. Other studies have also indicated that oxidative stress is strongly connected with ER stress [108,109]. Both of them trigger various inflammatory molecules and apoptosis cascades which are involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases, specifically liver injuries. In the ER lumen, stable protein folding requires the formation of disulfide bonds between cysteine residues of the proteins [110]. Glutathione (GSH), a non-protein thiol present abundantly in eukaryotic cells, can be reduced to glutathione disulfide (GSSG), which is important in maintaining ER redox hemostasis and which ensures correct protein folding [111]. An imbalance between the glutathione (GSH/GSSH) ratio and the generation of misfolded proteins leads to the production of ROS [112]. In eukaryotes, protein folding is regulated by multifunctional chaperons and oxidoreductases (protein disulfide isomerase (PDI)). PDI accepts a pair of electrons from the cysteine residues in polypeptide substrates, resulting in its reduction and the oxidation of its substrates. Further, PDI transfers the electrons to the ER oxidoreductase 1 (ERO1), which further transfers it to the molecular oxygen and produces H2O2 to start a new cycle (Figure 3) [113].
Oxidative stress activates ER stress cascade and alleviates the expression of ER transmembrane proteins, e.g., ATF6, CHOP, and ATF4. A decrease in oxidative stress means a decrease in ER stress [114]. The correlation of oxidative stress with ER stress in liver injuries has been reported by a number of authors. Kim et al. (2018) showed that TM-induced ER stress increases MDA levels, GRP 78, and CHOP, and decreases GSH levels in liver cancer cell lines [97]. Moslehi et al. (2019) showed that TM-induced ER stress attenuates amygdalin. It can be said that amygdalin works through antioxidant machinery to combat ER stress [115]. Zhang et al. (2019) reported the pathogenic role of oxidative stress and ER stress in the early initiating stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) [116].

6. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signaling Pathways

The ER stress pathway has been considered the most efficient apoptosis signaling pathway and has a vital role in human liver cancer. IRE1α-XBP1, PERK-eIF2α-ATF4, ATF6 are the UPR signaling pathways that promote cell death in response to ER stress (Figure 4). The functions of each UPR mediator and their possible links to apoptotic signaling are discussed below.

6.1. IRE1α-XBP1 Pathway

IRE1 is the transmembrane type-I protein that possesses both kinase and endoribonuclease (RNAse) activities and helps in modulating ER stress [117]. IRE1 exists in two isoforms, IRE1α and IRE1β. The IRE1α is expressed extensively, whereas IRE1β expression is confined to the intestinal epithelium and gastrointestinal tract. IRE1α-knockout mice exhibit embryonic lethality, while IRE1β knockout in mice is viable. Thus, IRE1α is considered a positive regulator for mammalian cell survival [118]. During ER stress, IRE1α disassociates from GRP78/Bip [119], undergoes dimerization, and autophosphorylation. X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1) mRNA is the first substrate described for IRE1α endonuclease activity [120], which stimulates the non-conventional splicing of XBP-1 mRNA to produce its active form that is spliced XBP-1 [121]. This activated form of XBP1 encourages the expression of ER quality-control genes, thus enhancing the protein folding capacity of the ER. Spliced XBP1 modulates the expression of genes involved in protein folding, secretion, redox homeostasis, oxidative stress response, and ER-associated degradation (ERAD) [122]. IRE1α-XBP1 signaling has been reported to possess a prominent role in human cancer including HCC [123].

6.2. PERK-eIF2α-ATF4 Pathway

The enzyme protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) is an ER transmembrane protein that is associated with BiP/GRP78 in its inactive form. On UPR activation, it becomes dissociated from the Bip/GRP78 complex and undergoes oligomerization and autophosphorylation, and thus becomes activated [124]. Active PERK plays an important role in suppressing global protein synthesis by attenuating mRNA translation and inhibiting the entry of new proteins into the ER lumen. This process is regulated by phosphorylation-mediated inactivation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2α). Phosphorylation of eIF2α at Ser51 residue inhibits protein translation by reducing the Cyclin D1 pool and cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase, which ultimately diminishes protein burden and helps the cells to overcome the stressful conditions [125]. The activated PERK- eIF2α promotes the translation of ATF4, which encourages cell survival by regulating protein biosynthesis and transport. Cells lacking PERK are reported to be supersensitive to ER stress conditions. Thus, inhibition of the PERK- eIF2α-ATF4 signaling pathway could be a promising target for cancer prevention.

6.3. ATF6 Pathway

ATF6 is a type II transmembrane protein from the leucine zipper family of transcription factors [126]. It is the cytoprotective factor and ER stress modulator that participates actively in the UPR signaling pathway [127]. Under chronic ER stress, an isoform ATF6α disassociates from the GRP78 proteins and translocates to the Golgi apparatus, where it undergoes proteolysis by the resident Site 1 (S1P) and Site 2 (S2P) proteases. This releases a cytosolic fragment that migrates to the nucleus and regulates transcription [125]. To maintain ER hemostasis, cleaved ATF6α plays a prominent role in the regulation of genes involved in protein synthesis and ER-associated degradation (ERAD) [128].

7. Role of Kaempferol in ER Stress and Oxidative Stress-Induced Apoptosis

Uncontrolled and sustained ER stress leads to cellular damage and eventually induces apoptosis by activating the mitochondrial intrinsic apoptotic pathway. This pathway is activated by various micro-environmental stimuli, such as DNA damage, ER stress, ROS overload, and replication stress [129]. During prolonged ER stress, PERK induces selective translation of ATF4 and transcription of the CHOP gene, which ultimately results in the activation of apoptotic machinery [130]. Several studies have shown the importance of kaempferol in ER stress and oxidative stress-induced apoptosis through a different mechanism (Table 3). Kaempferol induces apoptosis in the liver cancer cell line via the ER stress-CHOP signaling pathway by increasing the protein expression levels of Grp78, Grp94, PERK, IRE1α, ATF6, caspase 4, CHOP, and cleaved caspase 3 [131]. Kaempferol pretreatment impedes hepatocyte apoptosis to protect mice from liver failure by regulating the ER stress-Grp78-CHOP signaling pathway [132]. Kaempferol has shown a protective effect in rat hepatoma cells over a broad concentration range by inducing oxidative stress and apoptosis [133]. Additionally, some researchers have revealed the antioxidant ability of kaempferol (present in aqueous Pepino leaf extract (AEPL)) on HepG2 cells by promoting the expression of Nrf2 and its target genes (SOD1 and GPX3), reducing ER stress and inhibiting apoptosis [134].

8. Modulation of ER Stress and Autophagy Machinery by Kaempferol

Oxidative stress and ER stress tend to function through autophagy, which is a self-degradative process and plays an essential role in removing misfolded and degradative proteins and clearing damaged cellular organelles [135]. Interestingly, some researchers have found that autophagy itself is capable of preventing cancer in some phases via tissue damage and genomic instability, etc [136].
The ER, being a trafficking organelle, drives the cell towards death. The autophagy machinery is activated in response to ER stress [137]. Disruption in the autophagic process and alteration in ER hemostasis may promote serious liver diseases. Therefore, identifying and targeting the pathways with the help of traditional drugs appears to be beneficial in its treatment. Kaempferol exerts a positive effect on the autophagic machinery in combatting cancer [118]. Many researchers have demonstrated the modulatory effect of kaempferol on autophagy in different human cancers. In gastric cancer cells, kaempferol induces autophagic cell death via activating the IRE1-JNK-CHOP signaling pathway and inhibiting G9a cells [97]. Furthermore, another study validates the inhibitory effect of kaempferol in autophagy in lung cancer cells. Cells treated with kaempferol showed miR-340 overexpression, elevated PTEN, and reduced p-PI3K and p-AKT levels. The autophagic induction was confirmed through the increased expression of LC3-II, ATG7 and Beclin 1, and the reduced expression of p62 [18]. Kaempferol is found to inhibit cell proliferation, motility, and invasion by stimulating apoptosis and autophagy in RKO, HCT-116, HT-29, and DLD-1 colon cancer cell lines [138]. Kaempferol possesses anti-glioma activity by generating ROS and subsequently autophagy followed by pyroptosis (an inflammatory form of programmed cell death activated by some inflammasomes) in glioblastoma cell lines [83].
Kaempferol helps in modulating ER stress and autophagy, thus protecting the cells against malfunction [139]. Few reports are available indicating the potential of kaempferol in preventing HCC via autophagy and ER stress (Table 3). It induces cell mortality derived from autophagy by triggering the AMPK signaling pathway [140]. Kaempferol showed a concentration- and time-dependent inhibitory effect on liver cancer cells by inducing autophagy via the ER stress-CHOP signaling pathway [48].

9. Conclusions and Future Perspective

Kaempferol has been introduced into medical research due to its cancer-preventive activity. It specifically inhibits cancerous cells without disturbing the normal ones. It exerts chemopreventive effects against HCC by inducing mitochondrial apoptosis, autophagy, cell cycle arrest, ER stress, etc. The latest research on kaempferol shows it as an immune checkpoint modulator. Moreover, it can be used in combination with sorafenib and doxorubicin to enhance its efficacy in treating HCC and liver cancer.
Most of the research on the anti-cancer potential of kaempferol was carried out using human cell lines (in vitro). There are inadequate data on animal (in vivo) studies and clinical trials. There is an immense need for more in-depth in vivo experiments which will establish kaempferol as a more suitable and potent candidate as a chemopreventive agent against HCC.
Additionally, oxidative stress and ER stress both play a prominent role in different liver diseases, including HCC. Various reports show a close connection between oxidative stress and ER stress, but the molecular mechanism behind this association in hepatocarcinogenesis has not yet been completely explored. Therefore, further studies are required to determine the molecular mechanism of the interaction between OS and ER stress signaling in liver diseases.
Moreover, there are limitations in using kaempferol for the treatment of cancer, because of its poor solubility and bioavailability. This can be enhanced if it is given in combination with other anti-cancer drugs. Nanoformulations of kaempferol can also be prepared to increase its bioavailability.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Meenakshi Gupta (Research Scholar, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Noida, and Uttar Pradesh, India) for her insightful comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moratalla-López, N.; Lorenzo, C.; Alonso, G.L.; Sánchez, A.M. Kaempferol glycosides in Crocus: Sources, biosynthesis, and uses. In Kaempferol: Biosynthesis, Food Sources and Therapeutic Uses, 2016th ed.; Nova Science Publisher: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 151–195. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dabeek, W.M.; Marra, M.V. Dietary quercetin and kaempferol: Bioavailability and potential cardiovascular-related bioactivity in humans. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sumaiya, S.; Sharma, A.; Naved, T.; Sarwat, M. Amelioration of liver ailments by saffron (Crocus sativus) and its secondary metabolites. In Saffron: The Age Old Panacea in New Light; Sarwat, M., Sumaiya, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alam, W.; Khan, H.; Shah, M.A.; Cauli, O.; Saso, L. Kaempferol as a dietary anti-inflammatory agent: Current therapeutic standing. Molecules 2020, 25, 4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Afrin, S.; Haneefa, S.M.; Fernandez-Cabezudo, M.J.; Giampieri, F.; Al-Ramadi, B.K.; Battino, M. Therapeutic and preventive properties of honey and its bioactive compounds in cancer: An evidence-based review. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2020, 33, 50–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, H.; Ji, H.S.; Kang, J.H.; Shin, D.H.; Park, H.Y.; Choi, M.S.; Lee, C.H.; Lee, I.K.; Yun, B.S.; Jeong, T.S. Soy leaf extract containing kaempferol glycosides and pheophorbides improves glucose homeostasis by enhancing pancreatic β-cell function and suppressing hepatic lipid accumulation in db/db mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 7198–7210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhou, M.; Ren, H.; Han, J.; Wang, W.; Zheng, Q.; Wang, D. Protective effects of kaempferol against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated rat heart via antioxidant activity and inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 481405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, A.; Du, Y.; Ye, M.; Pu, X.; Qi, X. Intestinal absorption and neuroprotective effects of kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 31408–31416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chandramohan, G.; Al-Numair, K.S.; Alsaif, M.A.; Veeramani, C. Antidiabetic effect of kaempferol a flavonoid compound, on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats with special reference to glycoprotein components. Prog. Nutr. 2015, 17, 50–57. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vellosa, J.C.; Regasini, L.O.; Khalil, N.M.; Bolzani, V.D.; Khalil, O.A.; Manente, F.A.; Netto, H.P.; Oliveira, O.M. Antioxidant and cytotoxic studies for kaempferol, quercetin and isoquercitrin. Eclética Quim. 2011, 36, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tatsimo, S.J.; de Dieu Tamokou, J.; Havyarimana, L.; Csupor, D.; Forgo, P.; Hohmann, J.; Kuiate, J.R.; Tane, P. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of kaempferol rhamnoside derivatives from Bryophyllum pinnatum. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kim, S.H.; Choi, K.C. Anti-cancer effect and underlying mechanism (s) of kaempferol, a phytoestrogen, on the regulation of apoptosis in diverse cancer cell models. Toxicol. Res. 2013, 29, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Patel, S.; Sarwat, M.; Khan, T.H. Mechanism behind the anti-tumour potential of saffron (Crocus sativus L.): The molecular perspective. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 2017, 115, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Imran, M.; Salehi, B.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Gondal, T.A.; Saeed, F.; Imran, A.; Shahbaz, M.; Fokou, P.V.T.; Arshad, M.U.; Khan, H.; et al. Kaempferol: A key emphasis to its anticancer potential. Molecules 2019, 24, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Crespy, V. The splanchnic metabolism of flavonoids highly differed according to the nature of the compound. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003, 284, G980–G988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ren, J.; Lu, Y.; Qian, Y.; Chen, B.; Wu, T.; Ji, G. Recent progress regarding kaempferol for the treatment of various diseases. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 2759–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Huang, W.W.; Tsai, S.C.; Peng, S.F.; Lin, M.W.; Chiang, J.H.; Chiu, Y.J.; Fushiya, S.; Tseng, M.T.; Yang, J.S. Kaempferol induces autophagy through AMPK and AKT signaling molecules and causes G2/M arrest via downregulation of CDK1/cyclin B in SK-HEP-1 human hepatic cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 42, 2069–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Han, X.; Liu, C.F.; Gao, N.; Zhao, J.; Xu, J. Kaempferol suppresses proliferation but increases apoptosis and autophagy by up-regulating microRNA-340 in human lung cancer cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, Q.; Wei, L.; Lin, S.; Chen, Y.; Lin, J.; Peng, J. Synergistic effect of kaempferol and 5-fluorouracil on the growth of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, G.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Yan, Y.; Hong, X.; Lin, Z. Kaempferol inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of liver cancer HepG2 cells by down-regulation of microRNA-21. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2018, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zamora-Ros, R.; Fedirko, V.; Trichopoulou, A.; González, C.A.; Bamia, C.; Trepo, E.; Nöthlings, U.; Duarte-Salles, T.; Serafini, M.; Bredsdorff, L.; et al. Dietary flavonoid, lignan and antioxidant capacity and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition study. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 2429–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Woo, H.D.; Kim, J. Dietary flavonoid intake and smoking-related cancer risk: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Nair, B.; Anto, R.J.; Sabitha, M.; Nath, L.R. Kaempferol-mediated sensitization enhances chemotherapeutic efficacy of sorafenib against hepatocellular carcinoma: An in silico and in vitro approach. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2020, 10, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kampkötter, A.; Nkwonkam, C.G.; Zurawski, R.F.; Timpel, C.; Chovolou, Y.; Wätjen, W.; Kahl, R. Effects of the flavonoids kaempferol and fisetin on thermotolerance, oxidative stress and FoxO transcription factor DAF-16 in the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans. Arch. Toxicol. 2007, 81, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liao, W.; Chen, L.; Ma, X.; Jiao, R.; Li, X.; Wang, Y. Protective effects of kaempferol against reactive oxygen species-induced hemolysis and its antiproliferative activity on human cancer cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 114, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Halliwell, B. Antioxidant defence mechanisms: From the beginning to the end (of the beginning). Free Radic. Res. 1999, 31, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ciccarone, F.; Castelli, S.; Ciriolo, M.R. Oxidative stress-driven autophagy acROSs onset and therapeutic outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 6050123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Redza-Dutordoir, M.; Averill-Bates, D.A. Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biochim. Biophys. Acta -Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863, 2977–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shah, A.M.; Channon, K.M. Free radicals and redox signalling in cardiovascular disease. Heart 2004, 90, 486–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Misra, M.K.; Sarwat, M.; Bhakuni, P.; Tuteja, R.; Tuteja, N. Oxidative stress and ischemic myocardial syndromes. Med. Sci. Monit. 2009, 15, 209–219. [Google Scholar]
  31. Uttara, B.; Singh, A.V.; Zamboni, P.; Mahajan, R.T. Oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases: A review of upstream and downstream antioxidant therapeutic options. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2009, 7, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Namgyal, D.; Ali, S.; Mehta, R.; Sarwat, M. The Neuroprotective effect of curcumin against Cd-induced neurotoxicity and hippocampal neurogenesis promotion through CREB-BDNF signaling pathway. Toxicology 2020, 442, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bowler, R.P.; Crapo, J.D. Oxidative stress in allergic respiratory diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2002, 110, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Klaunig, J.E.; Kamendulis, L.M. The role of oxidative stress in carcinogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 44, 239–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rawla, P.; Sunkara, T.; Muralidharan, P.; Raj, J.P. Update in global trends and aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Contemp. Oncol. 2018, 22, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gupta, M.; Chandan, K.; Sarwat, M. Role of miRNA and long non-coding RNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Suresh, D.; Srinivas, A.N.; Kumar, D.P. Etiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Special Focus on Fatty Liver Disease. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 601710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chandan, K.; Gupta, M.; Sarwat, M. Role of host and pathogen-derived micrornas in immune regulation during infectious and inflammatory diseases. Front. Immunol. 2020, 10, 3081–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Raza, A.; Sood, G.K. Hepatocellular carcinoma review: Current treatment, and evidence-based medicine. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 4115–4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pasini, F.; Serenari, M.; Cucchetti, A.; Ercolani, G. Treatment options for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: Review of the literature and current recommendations for management. Hepatoma Res. 2020, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zheng, S.; Xie, Q.; Cheng, J. Salvage liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma: Rescues and benefits. Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 3, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Paul, S.B.; Manjunatha, Y.C.; Acharya, S.K. Palliative treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Has it made any difference? Trop. Gastroenterol. 2010, 30, 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gupta, M.; Akhtar, J.; Sarwat, M. MicroRNAs: Regulators of immunological reactions in hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sasaki, Y. Does oxidative stress participate in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma? J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 41, 1135–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Napoletano, F.; Baron, O.; Vandenabeele, P.; Mollereau, B.; Fanto, M. Intersections between regulated cell death and autophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 2019, 29, 323–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Pang, L.; Liu, K. Tumor-suppressing effects of autophagy on hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Res. 2018, 2, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, S.; Yang, L.; Li, X.; Li, B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Y.; Peng, X.; Jin, H.; Li, H. New insights into autophagy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2019, 9, 1329–1353. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Guo, H.; Lin, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Z.; Li, L.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Ren, F. Kaempferol induces hepatocellular carcinoma cell death via endoplasmic reticulum stress-CHOP-autophagy signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 82207–82216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Yazdani, H.O.; Huang, H.; Tsung, A. Autophagy: Dual response in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cells 2019, 8, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Marquardt, J.U.; Edlich, F. Predisposition to apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: From mechanistic insights to therapeutic strategies. Front. Oncol. 2019, 13, 1421–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Neuhouser, M.L. Dietary flavonoids and cancer risk: Evidence from human population studies. Nutr. Cancer 2004, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Takaki, A.; Yamamoto, K. Control of oxidative stress in hepatocellular carcinoma: Helpful or harmful? World J. Hepatol. 2015, 7, 968–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gentric, G.; Maillet, V.; Paradis, V.; Couton, D.; L’hermitte, A.; Panasyuk, G.; Fromenty, B.; Celton-Morizur, S.; Desdouets, C. Oxidative stress promotes pathologic polyploidization in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 981–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Tarocchi, M.; Galli, A. Oxidative stress as a mechanism for hepatocellular carcinoma. In Liver Pathophysiology; Elsevier B.V: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 279–287. [Google Scholar]
  55. Marra, M.; Sordelli, I.M.; Lombardi, A.; Lamberti, M.; Tarantino, L.; Giudice, A.; Stiuso, P.; Abbruzzese, A.; Sperlongano, R.; Accardo, M.; et al. Molecular targets and oxidative stress biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview. J. Transl. Med. 2011, 9, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Ye, Y.; Xie, L.; Li, W. Oxidative stress and liver cancer: Etiology and therapeutic targets. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ha, H.L.; Yu, D.Y. HBx-induced reactive oxygen species activates hepatocellular carcinogenesis via dysregulation of PTEN/Akt pathway. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 4932–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. El-Serag, H.B. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 1264–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Li, Y.; Li, S.; Duan, X.; Yang, C.; Xu, M.; Chen, L. Macrophage Phenotypes and Hepatitis B Virus Infection. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2020, 8, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Xu, C.; Zhou, W.; Wang, Y.; Qiao, L. Hepatitis B virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2014, 345, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sung, W.K.; Zheng, H.; Li, S.; Chen, R.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Lee, N.P.; Lee, W.H.; Ariyaratne, P.N.; Tennakoon, C.; et al. Genome-wide survey of recurrent HBV integration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jung, S.Y.; Kim, Y.J. C-terminal region of HBx is crucial for mitochondrial DNA damage. Cancer Lett. 2013, 331, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shen, S.; Niso-Santano, M.; Adjemian, S.; Takehara, T.; Malik, S.A.; Minoux, H.; Souquere, S.; Mariño, G.; Lachkar, S.; Senovilla, L.; et al. Cytoplasmic STAT3 represses autophagy by inhibiting PKR activity. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 667–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Formanowicz, D.; Radom, M.; Rybarczyk, A.; Formanowicz, P. The role of Fenton reaction in Ros-induced toxicity underlying atherosclerosis-modeled and analyzed using a Petri net-based approach. Biosystems 2018, 165, 71–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Negro, F. Natural history of NASH and HCC. Liver Int. 2020, 40, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Day, C.P.; James, O.F. Steatohepatitis: A tale of two “hits”? Gastroenterology 1998, 114, 842–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Romeo, S.; Kozlitina, J.; Xing, C.; Pertsemlidis, A.; Cox, D.; Pennacchio, L.A.; Boerwinkle, E.; Cohen, J.C.; Hobbs, H.H. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1461–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Uchida, D.; Takaki, A.; Oyama, A.; Adachi, T.; Wada, N.; Onishi, H.; Okada, H. Oxidative Stress Management in Chronic Liver Diseases and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Booth, A.; Magnuson, A.; Fouts, J.; Foster, M. Adipose tissue, obesity and adipokines: Role in cancer promotion. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2015, 21, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Byeon, J.S.; Jeong, J.Y.; Kim, M.J.; Lee, S.M.; Nam, W.H.; Myung, S.J.; Kim, J.G.; Yang, S.K.; Kim, J.H.; Suh, D.J. Adiponectin and adiponectin receptor in relation to colorectal cancer progression. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2758–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wu, J.; Du, J.; Liu, L.; Li, Q.; Rong, W.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zang, M.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Elevated pretherapy serum IL17 in primary hepatocellular carcinoma patients correlate to increased risk of early recurrence after curative hepatectomy. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Begriche, K.; Massart, J.; Robin, M.A.; Bonnet, F.; Fromenty, B. Mitochondrial adaptations and dysfunctions in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2013, 58, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Masarone, M.; Rosato, V.; Dallio, M.; Gravina, A.G.; Aglitti, A.; Loguercio, C.; Federico, A.; Persico, M. Role of oxidative stress in pathophysiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 9547613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dixon, S.J.; Lemberg, K.M.; Lamprecht, M.R.; Skouta, R.; Zaitsev, E.M.; Gleason, C.E.; Patel, D.N.; Bauer, A.J.; Cantley, A.M.; Yang, W.S.; et al. Ferroptosis: An iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell 2012, 149, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Santos, J.S.D.; Cirino, J.P.G.; de Oliveira Carvalho, P.; Ortega, M.M. The Pharmacological Action of Kaempferol in Central Nervous System Diseases: A Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 2143–2158. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wang, J.; Fang, X.; Ge, L.; Cao, F.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Z.; Xiao, W. Antitumor, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of kaempferol and its corresponding glycosides and the enzymatic preparation of kaempferol. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kashyap, D.; Sharma, A.; Tuli, H.S.; Sak, K.; Punia, S.; Mukherjee, T.K. Kaempferol–A dietary anticancer molecule with multiple mechanisms of action: Recent trends and advancements. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 30, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, F.; Wang, L.; Qu, C.; Chen, L.; Geng, Y.; Cheng, C.; Yu, S.; Wang, D.; Yang, L.; Meng, Z.; et al. Kaempferol induces ROS-dependent apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells via TGM2-mediated Akt/mTOR signaling. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 396. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yu, C.; Jin, C.; Igarashi, K. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity of kaempferol 3-O-β-D-(2, 6-di-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl) galactopyronoside against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in mice. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. BinMowyna, M.N.; AlFaris, N.A. Kaempferol suppresses acetaminophen-induced liver damage by upregulation/activation of SIRT1. Pharm. Biol. 2021, 59, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, M.; Sun, J.; Jiang, Z.; Xie, W.; Zhang, X. Hepatoprotective effect of kaempferol against alcoholic liver injury in mice. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2015, 43, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Chen, J.; Xuan, Y.H.; Luo, M.X.; Ni, X.G.; Ling, L.Q.; Hu, S.J.; Chen, J.Q.; Xu, J.Y.; Jiang, L.Y.; Si, W.Z.; et al. Kaempferol alleviates acute alcoholic liver injury in mice by regulating intestinal tight junction proteins and butyrate receptors and transporters. Toxicology 2020, 429, 152338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fan, X.; Bai, J.; Hu, M.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Sun, Y.; Wang, B.; Hu, J.; Li, Y. Drug interaction study of flavonoids toward OATP1B1 and their 3D structure activity relationship analysis for predicting hepatoprotective effects. Toxicology 2020, 437, 152445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Singab, A.N.; Youssef, D.T.; Noaman, E.; Kotb, S. Hepatoprotective effect of flavonol glycosides rich fraction from egyptianVicia calcarata desf. Against CCI 4-induced liver damage in rats. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2005, 28, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cho, S.S.; Yang, J.H.; Seo, K.H.; Shin, S.M.; Park, E.Y.; Cho, S.S.; Jo, G.U.; Eo, J.H.; Park, J.S.; Oh, D.S.; et al. Cudrania Tricuspidata Extract and Its Major Constituents Inhibit Oxidative Stress-Induced Liver Injury. J. Med. Food 2019, 22, 602–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Cai, F.F.; Bian, Y.Q.; Wu, R.; Sun, Y.; Chen, X.L.; Yang, M.D.; Zhang, Q.R.; Hu, Y.; Sun, M.Y.; Su, S.B. Yinchenhao decoction suppresses rat liver fibrosis involved in an apoptosis regulation mechanism based on network pharmacology and transcriptomic analysis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 114, 108863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Xu, T.; Huang, S.; Huang, Q.; Ming, Z.; Wang, M.; Li, R.; Zhao, Y. Kaempferol attenuates liver fibrosis by inhibiting activin receptor–like kinase 5. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 6403–6410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, Q.; Cheng, G.; Qiu, H.; Zhu, L.; Ren, Z.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, T.; Liu, L. The p53-inducible gene 3 involved in flavonoid-induced cytotoxicity through the reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in human hepatoma cells. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 1518–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mylonis, I.; Lakka, A.; Tsakalof, A.; Simos, G. The dietary flavonoid kaempferol effectively inhibits HIF-1 activity and hepatoma cancer cell viability under hypoxic conditions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 398, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yusof, H.M.; Ng, M.S.; Lam, T.W.; Kassim, M.N. Hypolipidemic effects of quercetin and kaempferol in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 241–245. [Google Scholar]
  92. Wonganan, O.; He, Y.J.; Shen, X.F.; Wongkrajang, K.; Suksamrarn, A.; Zhang, G.L.; Wang, F. 6-Hydroxy-3-O-methyl-kaempferol 6-O-glucopyranoside potentiates the anti-proliferative effect of interferon α/β by promoting activation of the JAK/STAT signaling by inhibiting SOCS3 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2017, 336, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Du, Y.C.; Lai, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhong, F.R.; Cheng, H.L.; Qian, B.L.; Tan, P.; Xia, X.M.; Fu, W.G. Kaempferol from Penthorum chinense Pursh suppresses HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 7925–7934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shrivastava, S.; Uthra, C.; Reshi, M.; Shukla, S. Protective Role of Kaempferol against Acrylamide Intoxication. Free Radic. Antioxid. 2017, 7, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lu, Y.; Shao, M.; Xiang, H.; Zheng, P.; Wu, T.; Ji, G. Integrative transcriptomics and metabolomics explore the mechanism of kaempferol on improving nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Food Funct. 2020, 2020, 10058–10069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wei, T.; Xiong, F.F.; Wang, S.D.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhang, Q.H. Flavonoid ingredients of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract regulate lipid metabolism through Sp1-mediated carnitine palmitoyltranferase 1A up-regulation. J. Biomed. Sci. 2014, 21, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Kim, C.; Kim, B. Anti-cancer natural products and their bioactive compounds inducing ER stress-mediated apoptosis: A review. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Mello, T.; Materozzi, M.; Galli, A. PPARs and mitochondrial metabolism: From NAFLD to HCC. PPAR Res. 2016, 2016, 7403230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Xiao, Y.B.; Cai, S.H.; Liu, L.L.; Yang, X.; Yun, J.P. Decreased expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha indicates unfavorable outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018, 10, 1781–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Chang, C.J.; Tzeng, T.F.; Liou, S.S.; Chang, Y.S.; Liu, I.M. bIntroduction. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 1876–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Raghunath, A.; Sundarraj, K.; Arfuso, F.; Sethi, G.; Perumal, E. Dysregulation of nrf2 in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role in cancer progression and chemoresistance. Cancers 2018, 10, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Shin, S.M.; Yang, J.H.; Ki, S.H. Role of the Nrf2-ARE pathway in liver diseases. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 763257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Haque, E.; Karim, M.R.; Teeli, A.S.; Śmiech, M.; Leszczynski, P.; Winiarczyk, D.; Parvanov, E.D.; Atanasov, A.G.; Taniguchi, H. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Hepatocellular Carcinoma Induction by Aberrant NRF2 Activation-Mediated Transcription Networks: Interaction of NRF2-KEAP1 Controls the Fate of Hepatocarcinogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Sarwat, M.; Tuteja, N. Calnexin: A versatile calcium binding integral membrane chaperone of endoplasmic reticulum. Calcium Bind. Proteins 2007, 2, 36–50. [Google Scholar]
  105. Schwarz, D.S.; Blower, M.D. The endoplasmic reticulum: Structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Mori, K. The unfolded protein response: The dawn of a new field. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. B 2015, 91, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Sarwat, M.; Naqvi, A.R. Heterologous Expression of Rice Calnexin (OsCNX) Confers Drought Tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 5451–5464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Maamoun, H.; Benameur, T.; Pintus, G.; Munusamy, S.; Agouni, A. Crosstalk between oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in endothelial dysfunction and aberrant angiogenesis associated with diabetes: A focus on the protective roles of heme oxygenase (HO)-1. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Bhattarai, K.R.; Riaz, T.A.; Kim, H.R.; Chae, H.J. The aftermath of the interplay between the endoplasmic reticulum stress response and redox signaling. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021, 53, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Creighton, T.E.; Hillson, D.A.; Freedman, R.B. Catalysis by protein-disulphide isomerase of the unfolding and refolding of proteins with disulphide bonds. J. Mol. Biol. 1980, 142, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hwang, C.J.; Sinskey, A.J.; Lodish, H.F. Oxidized redox state of glutathione in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 1992, 257, 1496–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bhandary, B.; Marahatta, A.; Kim, H.R.; Chae, H.J. An involvement of oxidative stress in endoplasmic reticulum stress and its associated diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 434–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Pollard, M.G.; Travers, K.J.; Weissman, J.S. Ero1p: A novel and ubiquitous protein with an essential role in oxidative protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell 1998, 1, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Plaisance, V.; Brajkovic, S.; Tenenbaum, M.; Favre, D.; Ezanno, H.; Bonnefond, A.; Bonner, C.; Gmyr, V.; Kerr-Conte, J.; Gauthier, B.R.; et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress links oxidative stress to impaired pancreatic beta-cell function caused by human oxidized LDL. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Moslehi, A.; Komeili-movahed, T.; Moslehi, M. Antioxidant effects of amygdalin on tunicamycin-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in the mice liver: Cross talk between endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress. J. Rep. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 8, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, B.; Li, M.; Zou, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhang, B.; Xia, C.; Zhang, H.; Yang, W.; Xu, C. NFκB/Orai1 facilitates endoplasmic reticulum stress by oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Riaz, T.A.; Junjappa, R.P.; Handigund, M.; Ferdous, J.; Kim, H.R.; Chae, H.J. Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor ire1α in cellular physiology, calcium, ROS signaling, and metaflammation. Cells 2020, 9, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chen, A.Y.; Chen, Y.C. A review of the dietary flavonoid, kaempferol on human health and cancer chemoprevention. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 2099–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Gong, J.; Wang, X.Z.; Wang, T.; Chen, J.J.; Xie, X.Y.; Hu, H.; Yu, F.; Liu, H.L.; Jiang, X.Y.; Fan, H.D. Molecular signal networks and regulating mechanisms of the unfolded protein response. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Yu, C.Y.; Hsu, Y.W.; Liao, C.L.; Lin, Y.L. Flavivirus infection activates the XBP1 pathway of the unfolded protein response to cope with endoplasmic reticulum stress. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 11868–11880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Sheng, X.; Nenseth, H.Z.; Qu, S.; Kuzu, O.F.; Frahnow, T.; Simon, L.; Greene, S.; Zeng, Q.; Fazli, L.; Rennie, P.S.; et al. IRE1α-XBP1s pathway promotes prostate cancer by activating c-MYC signaling. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Preston, G.M.; Brodsky, J.L. The evolving role of ubiquitin modification in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 445–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Shi, W.; Chen, Z.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Zhang, R.; Cheng, Q.; Xu, D.; Wu, L. Unravel the molecular mechanism of XBP1 in regulating the biology of cancer cells. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 2035–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Gorman, A.M.; Healy, S.J.; Jäger, R.; Samali, A. Stress management at the ER: Regulators of ER stress-induced apoptosis. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 134, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Limonta, P.; Moretti, R.M.; Marzagalli, M.; Fontana, F.; Raimondi, M.; Marelli, M.M. Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the anticancer activity of natural compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Liu, X.; Green, R.M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and liver diseases. Liver Res. 2019, 3, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Walczak, A.; Gradzik, K.; Kabzinski, J.; Przybylowska-Sygut, K.; Majsterek, I. The role of the ER-induced UPR pathway and the efficacy of its inhibitors and inducers in the inhibition of tumor progression. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 5729710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Hirsch, I.; Weiwad, M.; Prell, E.; Ferrari, D.M. ERp29 deficiency affects sensitivity to apoptosis via impairment of the ATF6–CHOP pathway of stress response. Apoptosis 2014, 19, 801–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Galluzzi, L.; Vitale, I.; Aaronson, S.A.; Abrams, J.M.; Adam, D.; Agostinis, P.; Alnemri, E.S.; Altucci, L.; Amelio, I.; Andrews, D.W.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 486–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Rozpedek, W.; Pytel, D.; Mucha, B.; Leszczynska, H.; Diehl, J.A.; Majsterek, I. The role of the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway in tumor progression during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Curr. Mol. Med. 2016, 16, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Guo, H.; Ren, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Yang, R.; Xie, B.; Li, Z.; Hu, Z.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, J. Kaempferol induces apoptosis in HepG2 cells via activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 13, 2791–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, H.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Xu, L.; Xie, B.; Shi, H.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Ren, F. Kaempferol protects mice from d-GalN/LPS-induced acute liver failure by regulating the ER stress-Grp78-CHOP signaling pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Niering, P.; Michels, G.; Wätjen, W.; Ohler, S.; Steffan, B.; Chovolou, Y.; Kampkötter, A.; Proksch, P.; Kahl, R. Protective and detrimental effects of kaempferol in rat H4IIE cells: Implication of oxidative stress and apoptosis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 209, 114–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hsu, J.Y.; Lin, H.H.; Chyau, C.C.; Wang, Z.H.; Chen, J.H. Aqueous Extract of Pepino Leaves Ameliorates Palmitic Acid-Induced Hepatocellular Lipotoxicity via Inhibition of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Apoptosis. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Glick, D.; Barth, S.; Macleod, K.F. Autophagy: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. J. Pathol. 2010, 221, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Li, X.; He, S.; Ma, B. Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in cancer. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 12–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Qi, Z.; Chen, L. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy. Autophagy Biol. Dis. 2019, 1206, 167–177. [Google Scholar]
  138. Budisan, L.; Gulei, D.; Jurj, A.; Braicu, C.; Zanoaga, O.; Cojocneanu, R.; Pop, L.; Raduly, L.; Barbat, A.; Moldovan, A.; et al. Inhibitory effect of CAPE and kaempferol in colon cancer cell lines—Possible implications in new therapeutic strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Ashrafizadeh, M.; Tavakol, S.; Ahmadi, Z.; Roomiani, S.; Mohammadinejad, R.; Samarghandian, S. Therapeutic effects of kaempferol affecting autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 911–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Han, B.; Yu, Y.Q.; Yang, Q.L.; Shen, C.Y.; Wang, X.J. Kaempferol induces autophagic cell death of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via activating AMPK signaling. Oncotarget. 2017, 8, 86227–86239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Xiang, H.; Shao, M.; Lu, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, T.; Ji, G. Kaempferol Alleviates Steatosis and Inflammation during Early Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Associated With Liver X Receptor α-Lysophosphatidylcholine Acyltransferase 3 Signaling Pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 59, 146–156. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Pharmacological activities of kaempferol.
Figure 1. Pharmacological activities of kaempferol.
Antioxidants 10 01419 g001
Figure 2. Antioxidant mechanism of KP via Nrf2-Keap1 pathway. KP inhibits the metabolism of ROS by acting on the Nrf2-Keap1 complex. The level of Nrf2 is augmented by KP after its disassociation from the complex. Nrf2 translocates to the nucleus and binds with ARE along with Maf transcription factor, which triggers the expression of the genes, inducing autophagy, inhibiting oxidation and inflammation. KP also plays a vital role in suppressing the mitochondrial membrane potential disruption and thus leading to restoration of normal physiological condition. Abbreviations: KP, kaempferol; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factors 2; Keap1, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1.
Figure 2. Antioxidant mechanism of KP via Nrf2-Keap1 pathway. KP inhibits the metabolism of ROS by acting on the Nrf2-Keap1 complex. The level of Nrf2 is augmented by KP after its disassociation from the complex. Nrf2 translocates to the nucleus and binds with ARE along with Maf transcription factor, which triggers the expression of the genes, inducing autophagy, inhibiting oxidation and inflammation. KP also plays a vital role in suppressing the mitochondrial membrane potential disruption and thus leading to restoration of normal physiological condition. Abbreviations: KP, kaempferol; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factors 2; Keap1, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1.
Antioxidants 10 01419 g002
Figure 3. Protein folding in ER in the presence of oxidative stress. In eukaryotic cells, protein folding in ER is regulated by different proteins (PDI and ERO1). Impaired disulfide bond formation leads to the accumulation of misfolded proteins resulting in oxidative stress. Abbreviations: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ERO1, ER oxidoreductin 1; FFA, free fatty acids; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, glutathione disulfide; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; PDI, protein disulfide isomerase.
Figure 3. Protein folding in ER in the presence of oxidative stress. In eukaryotic cells, protein folding in ER is regulated by different proteins (PDI and ERO1). Impaired disulfide bond formation leads to the accumulation of misfolded proteins resulting in oxidative stress. Abbreviations: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ERO1, ER oxidoreductin 1; FFA, free fatty acids; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, glutathione disulfide; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; PDI, protein disulfide isomerase.
Antioxidants 10 01419 g003
Figure 4. Adaptive pathways of ER stress. ER stress is induced due to the accumulation of misfolded and poorly folded proteins in the ER lumen. ER stress triggers UPR, which attenuates protein translation, enhances protein folding capacity, and thus re-establishes ER hemostasis. ER-resident chaperons interact with each other. Grp78/BiP interacts with three ER transmembrane proteins, viz. IRE-1α, PERK and ATF6. IRE-1α regulates the splicing of XBP1, which regulates the upregulation of ERAD. PERK phosphorylates eIF2α, which further activates ATF4 and thus increases the ER’s protein folding capacity. ATF6 gets cleaved by the specific proteases residing in the Golgi bodies, thus enhancing the expression of UPR genes and ERAD. Abbreviations: UPR, unfolded protein response; Grp78, glucose-regulated protein 78; BiP, binding protein; IRE-1α, Inositol requiring enzyme 1 α; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase; ATF6, activation transcription factor; XBP1, X- box-binding protein; ERAD, ER-associated degradation; eIF2α, eukaryotic transcription factor 2; ATF4, Activation transcription factor.
Figure 4. Adaptive pathways of ER stress. ER stress is induced due to the accumulation of misfolded and poorly folded proteins in the ER lumen. ER stress triggers UPR, which attenuates protein translation, enhances protein folding capacity, and thus re-establishes ER hemostasis. ER-resident chaperons interact with each other. Grp78/BiP interacts with three ER transmembrane proteins, viz. IRE-1α, PERK and ATF6. IRE-1α regulates the splicing of XBP1, which regulates the upregulation of ERAD. PERK phosphorylates eIF2α, which further activates ATF4 and thus increases the ER’s protein folding capacity. ATF6 gets cleaved by the specific proteases residing in the Golgi bodies, thus enhancing the expression of UPR genes and ERAD. Abbreviations: UPR, unfolded protein response; Grp78, glucose-regulated protein 78; BiP, binding protein; IRE-1α, Inositol requiring enzyme 1 α; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase; ATF6, activation transcription factor; XBP1, X- box-binding protein; ERAD, ER-associated degradation; eIF2α, eukaryotic transcription factor 2; ATF4, Activation transcription factor.
Antioxidants 10 01419 g004
Table 1. Role of oxidative stress on HCC and associated diseases.
Table 1. Role of oxidative stress on HCC and associated diseases.
CauseFactors ActivatedMechanism InvolvedImpact on Oxidative Stress and HCCReferences
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)HBx protein↑ Oncogene expression,
activation of macrophages to release proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL-8, and TNF-α), activation of apoptosis
↑ ROS and HCC[61]
Gene mutationInduce ER stress
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)Core ProteinActivates signaling pathways (TNFR, PKR, and STAT3 pathways), induces apoptosis, metastasis, and DNA damage.↑ ROS and HCC[64,75]
Fe2+ accumulationFenton reaction (Iron toxicity)
NASHFatty toxicity↑ IL-17↑ ROS and HCC[71]
Central ObesityReduces the level of adiponectin, leading to increased cell growth, proliferation, and metastasis
Table 2. The role of kaempferol in alleviating liver diseases.
Table 2. The role of kaempferol in alleviating liver diseases.
Diseases TypeIn Vitro/In Vivo ModelMechanism of ActionConcentrations/DosesReferences
Alcoholic liver injuryMice↑ expression of butyrate receptors, transporters, and TJ proteins in the intestinal mucosa.25, 50 and 100 mg/kg[83]
Alcoholic liver injuryALI mice modelIncreased antioxidant defense activity, decreased oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation.10 and 20 mg/kg[82]
Liver injuryBosentan-induced rat liver injury model and HEK-293 cellsInhibition of OATP1B1 transporter, maintaining a level of AST, ALT25 mg/kg and 1–150 μM[84]
Liver injuryMale Swiss albino ratsInhibition of lipid peroxidation caused by CCL4 reactive free radicals.25 mg/kg[85]
Liver injuryMale ddY mice↓ TBARS and TNF-α level in CCL4 treated mice.4.9 mg/kg[80]
Liver injuryMice and HepG2 cells Reduces AA+Fe-induced ROS production and reversed glutathione depletion, ↓ cell death.250 and 500 mg/kg and 100, 200 and 400 μM[86]
Liver fibrosisL02, LX2 and Rats↓ Protein levels of cleaved caspase-3, ↑ p-ERK1/2, PI3K, and Bcl-XL protein expression in TNF-α-stimulated L02 cells. The suppressed proliferation of LX2 cells and up-regulation of Bax and cleaved caspase-8.20 μM[87]
Liver fibrosisHSCs/Ccl4 induced mouse modelDown-regulation of hyaluronic acid, ALT, AST, Smad2/3.
Inhibits collagen synthesis and activation of HSCs cells.
Suppression of activin receptor-like kinase 5.
2–10 μmol/L[88]
Liver cancerHepG2Apoptosis, reduced expression of miR-21, upregulation of PTEN expression and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways inactivation.0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 μM [20]
Liver cancerHepG2 cells↑ PIG3 level at mRNA and protein level, ↑ROS production, cytochrome C release, ↓ mitochondrial membrane potential, upregulation of Bax/Bcl-2, activation of caspases-9 and -3, and maintaining the pro-oxidant activity.10, 20, 40 and 80 μM[89]
Human hepatic cancerSK-HEP-1↑ protein levels of p-AMPK, LC3-II, Atg 5, Atg 7, Atg 12 and Beclin 1, ↓ level of CDK1, cyclin B, p-AKT, and p-Mtor. Downregulation of CDK1/Cyclin B pathways, Induces autophagy.0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 μM [17]
HCCHuh 7HIF-1a activity inactivation by cytoplasmic mislocalization and MAPK pathway inhibition.1–100 µM[90]
HCCHepG2↑ The hypolipidemic effect through LDL-c uptake.15 µM[91]
HCCHepG2 cells↑ phosphorylation of JAK1, Tyk2, and STAT1/2, ↓ phosphorylation of STAT3, promoted endogenous IFN-α-regulated genes expression, ↓ expression of SOCS3, ↑the anti-proliferative effect of IFN-α, activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway 10 µg/mL[92]
HepatotoxicityMale C57BL/6 miceDecreased level of ALT, AST. Induce hepatocellular damage, ↑ expression of antioxidant enzymes, and apoptosis. Reduces NLRP3 expression and pro-inflammatory factors. Inhibition of HMGBI/TLR4/NF-KB signaling pathway.30 and 60 mg/kg[93]
Acrylamide hepatic intoxicationWistar female albino ratsReduced TBAR and GSH level5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg[94]
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)Male C57BL/6 mice↓ level of ALT, LDL, triglycerides, total cholesterol, lipid droplets and inflammatory cells infiltration in the liver, Upregulation of DEGs, Regulation of fatty acid degradation, expression of cytochrome P450, ↓ level of urinary proteins family (Mup17, Mup7, and Mup16).4 mg/mL[95]
NAFLDHepG2 cells↓ hepatic lipid accumulation, promote β oxidation in mitochondria and up-regulation of the expression of CPT1A20 μg/mL[96]
Table 3. Role of kaempferol in the induction of cell death (apoptosis/autophagy) through ER stress and oxidative stress pathways [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141].
Table 3. Role of kaempferol in the induction of cell death (apoptosis/autophagy) through ER stress and oxidative stress pathways [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141].
Diseases TypeIn Vitro/In Vivo ModelMechanism of ActionConcentations/DosesReferences
Acute liver failureMurine ALF model induced by D-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide miceRegulation of ER stress-Grp78-CHOP pathway5 mg/kg[132]
HCCHepG2Apoptosis, and Upregulation of CHOP gene expression.0, 5, 10, 25 50 and 100 µM [131]
HCCH4IIEH2O2 mediated lipid peroxidation leading to cell death and DNA damage, ↑ the activity of caspases-2, -3/7, -9, and -8/10, and apoptosis.5–25 µM[133]
HCCHepG2 and Huh 7↑ The protein level of Atg5, Atg7, Beclin1, and Overexpression of CHOP induces autophagy.5~100 μM[48]
NASHHepG2 cells/C57BL/6 NASH mice modelDecresed expression of LXRα, LPCAT3 and ERS-related factors PERK, eIF2α, ATF6, ATF4, XBP1, CHOP, IRE1α and GRP78 and induction of apoptosis.20, 40, 60 μmol/L and 20 mg/kg[141]
Hepatocellular lipotoxicityHepG2Decreased ER stress, increased antioxidant ability and inhibited apoptosis.1, 5, 10, 100 µg/mL[134]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, N.; Biswas, S.; Al-Dayan, N.; Alhegaili, A.S.; Sarwat, M. Antioxidant Role of Kaempferol in Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091419

AMA Style

Sharma N, Biswas S, Al-Dayan N, Alhegaili AS, Sarwat M. Antioxidant Role of Kaempferol in Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(9):1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Nidhi, Subhrajit Biswas, Noura Al-Dayan, Alaa Saud Alhegaili, and Maryam Sarwat. 2021. "Antioxidant Role of Kaempferol in Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma" Antioxidants 10, no. 9: 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop