Next Article in Journal
The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Aging and Age-Related Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Coffee Compounds Protection Against Lipotoxicity Is Associated with Lipid Droplet Formation and Antioxidant Response in Primary Rat Hepatocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mimicking the Effects of Antimicrobial Blue Light: Exploring Single Stressors and Their Impact on Microbial Growth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Generated By Protoporphyrin IX

1
Electronic & Nanoscale Engineering, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G128QQ, UK
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
3
Department of Medical Biophysics, University Health Network/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2025, 14(2), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14020176
Submission received: 28 October 2024 / Revised: 10 January 2025 / Accepted: 29 January 2025 / Published: 31 January 2025

Abstract

:
The effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for cancer treatment relies on the generation of cytotoxic singlet oxygen (1O2) in type II PDT. Hence, monitoring of 1O2 generation during PDT enables optimal treatment delivery to the tumor target with reduced off-target effects. Direct 1O2 observation by measuring its luminescence at 1270 nm remains challenging due to the very weak signal. This study presents 1O2 luminescence measurements using a time-resolved singlet oxygen luminescence detection system (TSOLD) applied to protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in different solvents (ethanol and acetone) and biological media (bovine serum albumin and agarose-based solid phantom). The compact experimental setup includes a nanosecond diode laser with a function generator, a cuvette with photosensitizer solution, optical filtering and mirrors, an InGaAs single-photon avalanche diode detector, and time-tagger electronics. Increasing the concentration of PpIX in these media from 1 to 10 µg/g resulted in a 3–5 × increase in the 1O2 luminescence signal. Furthermore, increasing light scattering in the sample using Intralipid from 0.1 to 1% led to a decrease in the 1O2 luminescence signal and lifetime. These results confirm the marked effect of the microenvironment on the 1O2 signal and, hence, on the photodynamic efficacy.

1. Introduction

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive therapeutic modality that has been used for a variety of malignant and non-malignant conditions [1,2,3]. PDT for cancer treatment utilizes light, a photosensitizer (PS) and molecular oxygen to induce localized cell death by multiple mechanisms such as cell death by immune response [3,4,5]. In the so-called Type I pathway, the photoexcited triplet-state photosensitizer interacts with cellular substrates, most commonly membranes, to produce free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide, hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide [6,7]. As shown in Figure 1, in the Type II pathway that pertains to most clinical photosensitizers, the excited triplet-state PS transfers energy to triplet ground-state molecular oxygen (3O2), generating highly reactive singlet oxygen (1O2) [8,9,10]. Hence, sensitive monitoring of 1O2 during PDT should enable optimal treatment delivery to the tumor target with reduced off-target effects [3]. A variety of approaches have been investigated for PDT dosimetry, including biophysical/biological tissue response monitoring, explicit dosimetry in which the light, photosensitizer and tissue oxygenation are measured and combined into a biophysical model, and implicit dosimetry in which a surrogate measure such as photosensitizer photobleaching is used [4,10,11].
The direct technique of singlet oxygen luminescence dosimetry (SOLD) uses observation of the 1270 nm near-infrared luminescence emission of the 1O23O2 transition [12,13,14]. Since this directly quantifies the concentration of cytotoxic species, it can be considered the “gold standard” for PDT dosimetry. However, measurement is challenging due to the very low signal and the short half-life in biological media. Detection is significantly improved by the use of single-photon counting using NIR photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), InGaAs single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) and superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) [15,16,17,18]. Time-resolved single-photon counting (TSOLD) and gating allow for the subtraction of the contribution of the substantial background due to photosensitizer fluorescence and phosphorescence [13,17,19,20,21], while fitting the temporal spectrum yields the singlet oxygen and PS triplet-state lifetimes. Typically, measurements are made on and at wavelengths either side of the 1270 nm peak to subtract the residual background after long-pass filtering of the total emission. TSOLD has been validated through multiple in vitro and in vivo studies in cells, tumors and normal tissues [13,22].
TSOLD can be implemented using commercially available SPADs and SNSPDs with low dark count rates, low timing jitter and free-running operation. Here, we developed a versatile TSOLD testbed that incorporates a nanosecond diode excitation laser with a function generator that provides external triggering to select a suitable repetition rate, a cuvette containing the photosensitizer solution, custom optical filtering and mirrors, an InGaAs SPAD detector and time-resolved electronics.
The choice of photosensitizer plays a critical role in the efficacy and specificity of PDT treatments. An ideal photosensitizer should possess a high 1O2 quantum yield, strong absorption in the therapeutic window (~600–800 nm) and selective accumulation in the target cells/tissues [2,23]. Porphyrin-based compounds, such as porfimer sodium (Photofrin®), and protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) synthesized in target cells by administration of aminolevulinic acid, were among the first photosensitizers approved for clinical use [24,25]. However, there is a gap in knowledge of the lifetime and efficacy of 1O2 produced by PpIX photoactivation in various microenvironments [26]. Here, we performed a comprehensive study utilizing our in-house TSOLD system with PpIX in ethanol, acetone, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and agarose-based solid phantoms. The impact of light scattering on the 1O2 generation was determined by adding the lipoprotein Intralipid with either ethanol or methanol solvents to mimic a tissue-like microenvironment. This study of 1O2 luminescence detection by PpIX in various solvents and biological media is the first set towards future applications such as dosimetry for PDT.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Time-Resolved 1O2 Luminescence System

The system (Figure 2) is designed to measure the near-infrared singlet oxygen luminescence that comprises a nanosecond diode excitation laser with a function generator, a quartz cuvette (CV10Q35, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) containing photosensitizer solution, customized optical filtering and mirrors, a single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) detector, and time-tagger electronics for time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC).
The 6–129 ns pulse-width tunable diode laser (NPL52C: Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) has a broad spectral output of 515–525 nm and a variable repetition rate up to 50 kHz. The wavelength of the illuminated laser (520 nm) was selected corresponding to the secondary absorption region of PpIX. The output is coupled into a multimode optical fiber (core diameter 400 µm, 0.22 numerical aperture (M146L01, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA)) connected to a collimation system consisting of a parabolic mirror (RC04FC-P01, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) and 25 mm diameter short-pass (optical density OD = 5.0 at >950 nm) (FESH0950, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) and band-pass (304–785 nm: out-of-band OD = 4.0) (FGS550, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) filters to produce a 4 mm collimated beam that is reflected by a dichroic mirror (DMLP950, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) and focused into the cuvette using a parabolic mirror to illuminate the sample. The 1270 nm luminescence emission passes through a dichroic mirror and the combination of long-pass (OD = 5.0 at <1200 nm: FELH1200, Thorlabs) and band-pass filters (bandwidth 1260–1280 nm, out-of-band OD = 6.0) (1270BP20, Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT, USA). The beam is then coupled to a multimodal, 65 μm core diameter fiber to the SPAD detector (ID230, IDQ, Geneva, Switzerland) using a parabolic mirror. The TCSPC module (Time Tagger Ultra, Swabian Instruments, Stuttgart, Germany) counts the input signals from the function generator, sending a START signal through an electrical synchronization pulse, and the detector output then provides the STOP signal. Temporal histograms are thereby generated from single-photon detection events. Pulse pile-up can cause errors in the determination of the 1O2 lifetime so that the detection count rate is kept below 5% of the excitation laser pulse rate.

2.2. Photosensitizer in Various Media

The photosensitizer solutions were prepared by dissolving protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) (P8293, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) powder in ethanol or acetone. The molecular weight of PpIX is 562.66 g/mol and its molecular structure is shown in Figure 3. For the bovine serum albumin (BSA) and solid phantoms, the PpIX was dissolved first in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). A 50 µg/g BSA solution was prepared by dissolving BSA powder (A9647, Sigma Aldrich) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The solid phantoms were prepared using 1% agarose (A9539, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in deionized water as the base material [27], mixed with the PpIX-DMSO solution and maintained at room temperature (20–25 °C) to solidify. For each TSOLD experiment, the PpIX was used at 1, 3, 5, 8 and 10 µg/g concentrations in 1 mL samples.

2.3. Determination of Singlet Oxygen Lifetime

Singlet oxygen generation occurs due to energy transfer from a triplet-state photosensitizer exchanging energy with triplet ground-state oxygen (3O2). For short pulse activation (≤100 ns), the lifetime of singlet oxygen and triplet-state photosensitizers at time t following the pulse is given by Refs. [12,29]:
[ 1 O 2 ] ( t ) = N σ [ S 0 ] φ D .   τ D τ T τ D ( exp ( t τ T ) exp ( t τ D ) )
where [1O2] (t) is the singlet oxygen concentration, N is the number of photons per pulse, σ is the photosensitizer absorption cross-section at the excitation wavelength, [S0] is the photosensitizer concentration, φD is the photosensitizer singlet oxygen quantum yield, and τ D and τ T are the lifetimes of the singlet oxygen and triplet-state photosensitizer, respectively. After subtracting the background signal due to other sources of near-infrared emission, the measured time histograms were fitted using Equation (1) to calculate the two lifetimes.

2.4. Validation of TSOLD System

Before measuring the 1O2 luminescence signature from PpIX in different microenvironments, the TSOLD system performance was validated against measurements made with a set of 20 nm bandwidth band-pass filters centered at 1200, 1240, 1270, 1300 and 1340 nm. A solution of 10 µg/g PpIX in ethanol was illuminated by the 520 nm laser beam (520 nm ± 7.5 nm, 129 ns at 25 kHz) with a beam waist of 0.2 mm and an average intensity of 32 mW.mm−2. Signal acquisition was conducted with the SPAD, operating with 10% single-photon detection efficiency and a 41 µs dead time.

2.5. 1O2 Luminescence from PpIX in Ethanol and Acetone

Measurements were made using 10 min signal integration with 1–10 µg/g PpIX solution in 1 mL cuvettes with a path length of 10 mm, using a 1 mm diameter beam at 520 nm ± 7.5 nm, at 20 or 3.2 mW.mm−2 in ethanol and acetone, respectively. The SPAD was operated at 10% efficiency with 41 µs dead time to avoid pulse pile-up. Histograms were generated with 610 bins with a 65 ns width. These were fitted using Equation 1 using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm.

2.6. 1O2 Luminescence from PpIX in Biological Media

Measurement of singlet oxygen generation in cells and tissues is of value for dosimetry in photodynamic therapy. BSA and tissue-mimicking phantoms were excited by a 2 mm diameter laser beam at 5.5 mW.mm−2, 129 ns pulse width and 30 kHz repetition rate. The luminescence was measured after passing through a 1270 nm, 20 nm bandwidth filter using a SPAD with 25% efficiency and 34 µs dead time. Time histograms of 520 bins with a bin width of 65 ns were generated by capturing single-photon arrival events using the Time Tagger. These plots were fitted with Equation 1, used to calculate the 1O2 and photosensitizer triplet-state lifetimes.

2.7. Impact of Scattering on Singlet Oxygen Generation and Luminescence Lifetime

The scattering properties of a sample can affect the production of singlet oxygen [30] due to altered light fluence in the sample. Intralipid emulsion is commonly used as a light-scattering medium [31]. Here, 20% Intralipid (I141, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) diluted to 0.1–1% (after accounting for the 20% concentration of the stock commercial material) was added to a solution of 10 µg/g PpIX in 100% pure ethanol or acetone.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 4 shows the results of measuring the singlet oxygen luminescence of 10 µg/g PpIX in ethanol using the multiple band-pass filters.
Figure 5 shows the 1270 nm luminescence over time data for PpIX at different concentrations in ethanol and acetone. The derived 1O2 and photosensitizer triplet-state lifetimes are summarized in Table 1.
As expected, increasing the PpIX concentration had a minimal effect on the 1O2 lifetime in both solvents, but markedly increased the triplet-state lifetimes. The concentration-dependent triplet-state lifetime trend is consistent with previously reported data by Gemmell et al. [19] and is due to the high dose of PpIX.
The corresponding time histograms for PpIX in BSA and the solid phantom with different mass concentrations are shown in Figure 6.
From Figure 6, it is evident that the optimized SPAD efficiency and setup allow time-resolved detection of PpIX in biological-type media, despite the very weak signal. The total time-integrated counts increased 5–6-fold as the PpIX concentration increased from 1 to 10 µg/g. The corresponding 1O2 and triplet-state lifetimes are shown in Table 2.
The concentration of PpIX in agarose solid phantom directly impacts the 1O2 and triplet-state lifetimes. As the concentration of PpIX increases, excitonic interactions resulting from PPIX stacking and self-absorption become more pronounced, which causes a reduced triplet-state lifetime due to increased quenching and energy dissipation among closely packed PpIX molecules [32,33,34]. Meanwhile, the 1O2 lifetime increases with concentration in both BSA and agarose due to more efficient energy transfer to oxygen and potentially reduced non-radiative decay in the denser PpIX environment [35]. The photophysical properties and hydrophobicity of the surrounding medium are influenced by the specific interactions of PpIX with its microenvironment, such as protein binding in BSA or the gel matrix in agarose phantoms [36]. These effects are absent in the non-biological solvents. Also, the increase in viscosity of agar can impede the diffusion of singlet oxygen, consequently impacting its longevity and transport mechanisms. The reported studies showed that an increase in viscosity results in a decreased diffusion coefficient for singlet oxygen, thereby reducing diffusion distances and modifying its reactivity [37].
The time curves and fits by using Equation 1 for 10 µg/g PpIX in ethanol and acetone with different concentrations of added Intralipid are shown in Figure 7. The 1O2 luminescence counts decreased with increasing Intralipid concentration by ~5-fold and ~1.5-fold in ethanol and acetone, respectively. Qualitatively, this can be attributed to the increased scattering of the medium the excitation, and collected light reduces 1O2 luminescence detection [17,38]. The corresponding 1O2 and PpIX triplet-state lifetimes are shown in Table 3.
The addition of Intralipid has only a minor impact on the lifetime of singlet oxygen, except for some concentration-dependent reduction with acetone. Also, the PpIX binding to lipoproteins can alter the lifetime of singlet oxygen, which may occur due to the quenching of singlet oxygen by lipoprotein [39,40]. The PpIX triplet-state lifetime is significantly higher in ethanol in the presence of Intralipid and increases markedly with Intralipid concentration, while this effect is much less pronounced with acetone. Increased scattering can result in a prolonged residence time of the triplet state in the excited state, leading to diminished energy transfer efficiency and an extension of the triplet lifetime [41]. Due to different solubility properties of Intralipid in ethanol and acetone, variations in triplet-state lifetime are observed [42]. The residence time of the triplet state in the excited state can range from 100 ns to 10 s, contingent upon intrinsic factors, such as molecular photophysics, as well as extrinsic factors including environmental conditions and quenching agents [43]. Although the scattering properties of the solution do not exert a direct influence on the lifetime, they may affect measurements indirectly by altering signal detection within the scattering medium. Furthermore, variations in oxygen concentration can have a pronounced effect on triplet decay, as this can lead to quenching of the triplet state of protoporphyrin IX (PPIX), resulting in a reduced lifetime through chemical or collisional interactions.
The illumination laser diode (520 nm) wavelength was selected corresponding to the secondary absorption region of PpIX, which allows more effective excitation as well as minimizing background autofluorescence as compared to blue light. Also, the corresponding absorption coefficients of PpIX are higher at 520 nm than red wavelength which makes a better choice for studies such as optimizing singlet oxygen generation and detection under specific experimental conditions.
Finally, we note that, as with other reactive oxygen species, antioxidants can quench 1O2. This is used, for example, as a protective mechanism against oxidative damage in plants [44]. In mammalian cells, Soares et al. [45] have reported that the local oxidative stress produced by 1O2 during PDT can be mitigated through three main antioxidant mechanisms, namely superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione, and that the magnitude of this protective effect is cell type-dependent because of different endogenous levels of these reactants. An important translational issue is whether the “therapeutic window” for PDT damage to tumor versus normal tissues is impacted by their having different concentrations of antioxidants or could be enhanced by the tissue-specific administration of antioxidants. Direct 1O2 luminescence, as presented here, provides an excellent tool for studying these antioxidant effects directly and quantitatively without the potentially confounding use of secondary fluorescent reporters such as 1O2 sensor green.

4. Conclusions

The above results showed that the singlet oxygen (1O2) lifetime in PpIX photosensitizer is solvent- and microenvironment-dependent, ranging from ~14, ~49, ~29 and ~29 µs in ethanol, acetone, BSA and solid agarose, respectively. Acetone generally exhibits fewer non-radiative decay pathways for singlet oxygen in comparison to ethanol and biological media. This is attributed to the absence of hydrogen bonding, thereby leading to an extended lifetime [46,47,48]. The longer lifetime of 1O2 in BSA and agarose phantom, compared to ethanol, can be attributed to a combination of factors, including quenching interactions facilitated by protective protein interactions, viscosity, restricted diffusion due to the presence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic grooves, and physical properties (air-filled porosity, bulk density, shrinkage, etc.) of the biological media [49,50,51]. The singlet oxygen is highly reactive and short-lived; therefore, a small variation in 1O2 lifetime alters its reactivity and diffusivity. Esben Skovsen et al. (2005) demonstrated that singlet oxygen can have a surprisingly long lifetime within cells, allowing it to diffuse over considerable distances [52]. Also, a shorter lifetime of triplet-state photosensitizers such as 0.16 µs has been reported in BSA compared to agarose or ethanol due to quenching interactions with the protein and the complex microenvironment within BSA [51,53].
In the context of Intralipid studies, it has been observed that the binding of PpIX to lipoproteins has the potential to modify the lifetime of singlet oxygen. This modification arises from the possible quenching of singlet oxygen by lipoproteins [40]. The phenomenon of increased scattering can lead to a prolonged residence time of the triplet state in the excited state. Consequently, this can result in diminished energy transfer efficiency and an extension of the triplet lifetime [41]. Overall, the effects on the measurement are altered due to light scattering and possible binding/interactions of the PpIX with the Intralipid lipoproteins.
The TSOLD system used in this study is a significant advance over earlier instruments [16,17], featuring a nanosecond pulsed diode laser with a tunable pulse width and pulse rate capabilities. Notably, this system is considerably more compact and lower-cost than its predecessors [19,29]. The system’s performance was confirmed through the detection of the 1O2 signal from PpIX in ethanol, where the 1270 nm counts were significantly higher relative to the background than published values [19]. In the next stage of system engineering, the bifurcated fiber bundle coupled with an ns pulsed laser will further reduce the footprint of the system, further improving its practicality, especially for in vivo and clinical use.
In summary, the measurement of the PpIX concentration dependence of the luminescence generation in different solvents and biological media demonstrated that the 1O2 generation and lifetime are affected by changes in microenvironmental factors. Optical scattering in biological tissues also affects the spatial distribution of excitation light, and thereby of the 1O2 generation, as well as the near-infrared luminescence [54,55]. Also, quenching and diffusion limitations in biological media further reduce the 1O2 lifetime [54]. Hence, these multiple factors need to be taken into account during 1O2 luminescence measurements for PDT dosimetry, especially where absolute singlet oxygen concentrations are used to predict or correlate with the biological outcomes of the treatment. In addition, the singlet oxygen lifetime directly affects the effective diffusion range at cellular/subcellular scales [51], and previous studies have shown that, because of the very short 1O2 lifetime, the localization of the photosensitizer in different organelles has a marked impact on the cytotoxicity even for the same concentration of singlet oxygen [56].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V., B.C.W., T.C.Z. and R.H.H.; methodology, V.V., B.C.W., T.C.Z. and R.H.H.; software, V.V. and R.H.H.; validation, V.V. and R.H.H.; formal analysis, V.V., B.C.W. and R.H.H.; investigation, V.V. and R.H.H.; resources, V.V. and R.H.H.; data curation, V.V.; writing—original draft preparation, V.V.; writing—review and editing, V.V., W.Y., B.C.W., T.C.Z. and R.H.H.; visualization, V.V., B.C.W., T.C.Z. and R.H.H.; supervision, B.C.W., T.C.Z. and R.H.H.; project administration, T.C.Z. and R.H.H.; funding acquisition, T.C.Z. and R.H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) NIBIB, grant number R01 EB032821.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brown, S.B.; Brown, E.A.; Walker, I. The Present and Future Role of Photodynamic Therapy in Cancer Treatment. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Agostinis, P.; Berg, K.; Cengel, K.A.; Foster, T.H.; Girotti, A.W.; Gollnick, S.O.; Hahn, S.M.; Hamblin, M.R.; Juzeniene, A.; Kessel, D.; et al. Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer: An Update. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2011, 61, 250–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dolmans, D.E.J.G.J.; Fukumura, D.; Jain, R.K. Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wilson, B.C.; Patterson, M.S.; Lilge, L. Implicit and Explicit Dosimetry in Photodynamic Therapy: A New Paradigm. Laser Med. Sci. 1997, 12, 182–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bankó, C.; Nagy, Z.L.; Nagy, M.; Szemán-Nagy, G.G.; Rebenku, I.; Imre, L.; Tiba, A.; Hajdu, A.; Szöllősi, J.; Kéki, S.; et al. Isocyanide Substitution in Acridine Orange Shifts DNA Damage-Mediated Phototoxicity to Permeabilization of the Lysosomal Membrane in Cancer Cells. Cancers 2021, 13, 5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Castano, A.P.; Demidova, T.N.; Hamblin, M.R. Mechanisms in Photodynamic Therapy: Part One—Photosensitizers, Photochemistry and Cellular Localization. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2004, 1, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gunaydin, G.; Gedik, M.E.; Ayan, S. Photodynamic Therapy—Current Limitations and Novel Approaches. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 691697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Plaetzer, K.; Krammer, B.; Berlanda, J.; Berr, F.; Kiesslich, T. Photophysics and Photochemistry of Photodynamic Therapy: Fundamental Aspects. Lasers Med. Sci. 2009, 24, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Montaseri, H.; Kruger, C.A.; Abrahamse, H. Review: Organic Nanoparticle Based Active Targeting for Photodynamic Therapy Treatment of Breast Cancer Cells. Oncotarget 2020, 11, 2120–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, M.; Penjweini, R.; Gemmell, N.; Veilleux, I.; McCarthy, A.; Buller, G.; Hadfield, R.; Wilson, B.; Zhu, T. A Comparison of Singlet Oxygen Explicit Dosimetry (SOED) and Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Dosimetry (SOLD) for Photofrin-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy. Cancers 2016, 8, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, M.M.; Darafsheh, A. Light Sources and Dosimetry Techniques for Photodynamic Therapy. Photochem. Photobiol. 2020, 96, 280–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Niedre, M.; Patterson, M.S.; Wilson, B.C. Direct Near-Infrared Luminescence Detection of Singlet Oxygen Generated by Photodynamic Therapy in Cells In Vitro and Tissues In Vivo. Photochem. Photobiol. 2002, 75, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jarvi, M.T.; Niedre, M.J.; Patterson, M.S.; Wilson, B.C. Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Dosimetry (SOLD) for Photodynamic Therapy: Current Status, Challenges and Future Prospects. Photochem. Photobiol. 2006, 82, 1198–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hackbarth, S.; Islam, W.; Fang, J.; Subr, V.; Röder, B.; Etrych, T.; Maeda, H. Singlet Oxygen Phosphorescence Detection in Vivo Identifies PDT-Induced Anoxia in Solid Tumors. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019, 18, 1304–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, I.-W.; Park, J.M.; Roh, Y.J.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, M.-G.; Hasan, T. Direct Measurement of Singlet Oxygen by Using a Photomultiplier Tube-Based Detection System. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 159, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boso, G.; Ke, D.; Korzh, B.; Bouilloux, J.; Lange, N.; Zbinden, H. Time-Resolved Singlet-Oxygen Luminescence Detection with an Efficient and Practical Semiconductor Single-Photon Detector. Biomed. Opt. Express 2016, 7, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gemmell, N.R.; McCarthy, A.; Liu, B.; Tanner, M.G.; Dorenbos, S.D.; Zwiller, V.; Patterson, M.S.; Buller, G.S.; Wilson, B.C.; Hadfield, R.H. Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Detection with a Fiber-Coupled Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detector. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hadfield, R.H.; Leach, J.; Fleming, F.; Paul, D.J.; Tan, C.H.; Ng, J.S.; Henderson, R.K.; Buller, G.S. Single-Photon Detection for Long-Range Imaging and Sensing. Optica 2023, 10, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gemmell, N.R.; McCarthy, A.; Kim, M.M.; Veilleux, I.; Zhu, T.C.; Buller, G.S.; Wilson, B.C.; Hadfield, R.H. A Compact Fiber-optic Probe-based Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Detection System. J. Biophotonics 2017, 10, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morozov, P.; Lukina, M.; Shirmanova, M.; Divochiy, A.; Dudenkova, V.; Gol’tsman, G.N.; Becker, W.; Shcheslavskiy, V.I. Singlet Oxygen Phosphorescence Imaging by Superconducting Single-Photon Detector and Time-Correlated Single-Photon Counting. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hackbarth, S.; Pfitzner, M.; Pohl, J.; Röder, B. Time-Resolved Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Ex Vivo. In Singlet Oxygen Detection and Imaging; Synthesis Lectures on Materials and Optics; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 61–80. ISBN 978-3-031-01263-1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Niedre, M.J.; Patterson, M.S.; Giles, A.; Wilson, B.C. Imaging of Photodynamically Generated Singlet Oxygen Luminescence In Vivo. Photochem. Photobiol. 2005, 81, 941–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sarbadhikary, P.; George, B.P.; Abrahamse, H. Recent Advances in Photosensitizers as Multifunctional Theranostic Agents for Imaging-Guided Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer. Theranostics 2021, 11, 9054–9088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sun, H.; Guo, R.; Guo, Y.; Song, J.; Li, Z.; Song, F. Boosting Type-I and Type-II ROS Production of Water-Soluble Porphyrin for Efficient Hypoxic Tumor Therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2023, 20, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, T.; Alimu, G.; Zhu, L.; Fan, H.; Zhang, L.; Du, Z.; Ma, R.; Chen, S.; Alifu, N.; Zhang, X. PpIX/IR-820 Dual-Modal Therapeutic Agents for Enhanced PDT/PTT Synergistic Therapy in Cervical Cancer. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 44643–44656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Myrzakhmetov, B.; Arnoux, P.; Mordon, S.; Acherar, S.; Tsoy, I.; Frochot, C. Photophysical Properties of Protoporphyrin IX, Pyropheophorbide-a, and Photofrin® in Different Conditions. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vikas, V.; Kumar, R.; Soni, S. Dynamic Change in Optical Properties of a Nanoparticle Embedded Tumor Phantom for Plasmonic Photothermal Cancer Therapeutics. J. Biophotonics 2023, 16, e202200179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Protoporphyrin IX = 95 553-12-8. Available online: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/ (accessed on 6 May 2024).
  29. Tsimvrakidis, K.; Gemmell, N.R.; Erotokritou, K.; Miki, S.; Yabuno, M.; Yamashita, T.; Terai, H.; Hadfield, R.H. Enhanced Optics for Time-Resolved Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Detection. IEEE J. Select. Top. Quantum Electron. 2019, 25, 7000107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jones, L.R.; Grossweiner, L.I. Singlet Oxygen Generation by Photofrin® in Homogeneous and Light-Scattering Media. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1994, 26, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Flock, S.T.; Jacques, S.L.; Wilson, B.C.; Star, W.M.; van Gemert, M.J.C. Optical Properties of Intralipid: A Phantom Medium for Light Propagation Studies. Lasers Surg. Med. 1992, 12, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Krasnovsky, A.A. Singlet Molecular Oxygen in Photobiochemical Systems: IR Phosphorescence Studies. Membr. Cell Biol. 1998, 12, 665–690. [Google Scholar]
  33. Vinklárek, I.S.; Scholz, M.; Dědic, R.; Hála, J. Singlet Oxygen Feedback Delayed Fluorescence of Protoporphyrin IX in Organic Solutions. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2017, 16, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Aebisher, D.; Serafin, I.; Batóg-Szczęch, K.; Dynarowicz, K.; Chodurek, E.; Kawczyk-Krupka, A.; Bartusik-Aebisher, D. Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Cancer—The Selection of Synthetic Photosensitizers. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. DeRosa, M. Photosensitized Singlet Oxygen and Its Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 233–234, 351–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ricchelli, F. Photophysical Properties of Porphyrins in Biological Membranes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1995, 29, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ogilby, P.R. Singlet Oxygen: There Is Indeed Something New under the Sun. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, Y.; Lin, L.; Liu, L.; Yu, Y.; Liao, X.; Gu, Y.; Li, B. Detection of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence in Skin Phantom Based on Optical Fiber Detection. In Proceedings of the Optics in Health Care and Biomedical Optics IX; Luo, Q., Li, X., Tang, Y., Gu, Y., Zhu, D., Eds.; SPIE: Hangzhou, China, 2019; p. 106. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sitte, E.; Senge, M.O. The Red Color of Life Transformed—Synthetic Advances and Emerging Applications of Protoporphyrin IX in Chemical Biology. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 3171–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yeh, P.-S.; Li, C.-C.; Lu, Y.-S.; Chiang, Y.-W. Structural Insights into the Binding and Degradation Mechanisms of Protoporphyrin IX by the Translocator Protein TSPO. JACS Au 2023, 3, 2918–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hussain, M.; Razi, S.S.; Tao, T.; Hartl, F. Triplet-Triplet Annihilation Photon up-Conversion: Accessing Triplet Excited States with Minimum Energy Loss. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2023, 56, 100618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Solubility of Softisan 100 in Ethanol + Water and Acetone + Water Solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55, 2333–2337. [CrossRef]
  43. Sakamoto, K.; Ohno-Okumura, E. Syntheses and Functional Properties of Phthalocyanines. Materials 2009, 2, 1127–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tournaire, C.; Croux, S.; Maurette, M.-T.; Beck, I.; Hocquaux, M.; Braun, A.M.; Oliveros, E. Antioxidant Activity of Flavonoids: Efficiency of Singlet Oxygen (1Δg) Quenching. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1993, 19, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Soares, H.T.; Campos, J.R.S.; Gomes-da-Silva, L.C.; Schaberle, F.A.; Dabrowski, J.M.; Arnaut, L.G. Pro-Oxidant and Antioxidant Effects in Photodynamic Therapy: Cells Recognise That Not All Exogenous ROS Are Alike. Chembiochem 2016, 17, 836–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Figueiredo, T.L.C.; Johnstone, R.A.W.; Sørensen, A.M.P.S.; Burget, D.; Jacques, P. Determination of Fluorescence Yields, Singlet Lifetimes and Singlet Oxygen Yields of Water-Insoluble Porphyrins and Metalloporphyrins in Organic Solvents and in Aqueous Media. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999, 69, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wilkinson, F.; Helman, W.P.; Ross, A.B. Quantum Yields for the Photosensitized Formation of the Lowest Electronically Excited Singlet State of Molecular Oxygen in Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1993, 22, 113–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mano, C.M.; Prado, F.M.; Massari, J.; Ronsein, G.E.; Martinez, G.R.; Miyamoto, S.; Cadet, J.; Sies, H.; Medeiros, M.H.G.; Bechara, E.J.H.; et al. Excited Singlet Molecular O2 (1Δg) Is Generated Enzymatically from Excited Carbonyls in the Dark. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Giménez, R.E.; Vargová, V.; Rey, V.; Turbay, M.B.E.; Abatedaga, I.; Morán Vieyra, F.E.; Paz Zanini, V.I.; Mecchia Ortiz, J.H.; Katz, N.E.; Ostatná, V.; et al. Interaction of Singlet Oxygen with Bovine Serum Albumin and the Role of the Protein Nano-Compartmentalization. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 94, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Miranda-Apodaca, J.; Hananya, N.; Velázquez-Campoy, A.; Shabat, D.; Arellano, J.B. Emissive Enhancement of the Singlet Oxygen Chemiluminescence Probe after Binding to Bovine Serum Albumin. Molecules 2019, 24, 2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kuimova, M.K.; Yahioglu, G.; Ogilby, P.R. Singlet Oxygen in a Cell: Spatially Dependent Lifetimes and Quenching Rate Constants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Skovsen, E.; Snyder, J.W.; Lambert, J.D.C.; Ogilby, P.R. Lifetime and Diffusion of Singlet Oxygen in a Cell. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8570–8573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Takemura, T.; Ohta, N.; Nakajima, S.; Sakata, I. Critical Importance of the Triplet Lifetime of Photosensitizer in Photodynamic Therapy of Tumor. Photochem. Photobiol. 1989, 50, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Codognato, D.C.K.; Pena, F.S.; dos Reis, E.R.; Ramos, A.P.; Borissevitch, I.E. Effects of Serum Albumin on the Photophysical Characteristics of Synthetic and Endogenous Protoporphyrin IX. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2022, 55, e12272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Reinert, M.; Piffaretti, D.; Wilzbach, M.; Hauger, C.; Guckler, R.; Marchi, F.; D’Angelo, M.L. Quantitative Modulation of PpIX Fluorescence and Improved Glioma Visualization. Front. Surg. 2019, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Weston, M.A.; Patterson, M.S. Chapter 33. Singlet Oxygen Dosimetry in Biological Media. In Comprehensive Series in Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences; Nonell, S., Flors, C., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2016; Volume 2, pp. 151–168. ISBN 978-1-78262-697-8. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Jablonski diagram illustrating the generation of the 1270 nm near-infrared luminescence emission of singlet oxygen (1O2) and triplet-state photosensitizer luminescence.
Figure 1. Jablonski diagram illustrating the generation of the 1270 nm near-infrared luminescence emission of singlet oxygen (1O2) and triplet-state photosensitizer luminescence.
Antioxidants 14 00176 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic and optical setup of the TSOLD experiment (upper). An optical beam from a nanosecond diode laser with a function generator illuminates the photosensitizer cuvette through a parabolic mirror and short-pass filters. The collected 1270 nm luminescence emission is coupled into an InGaAs-SPAD. TCSPC then generates time histograms of the 1O2 luminescence signal. (b) A photograph of the optical setup is shown (lower).
Figure 2. (a) Schematic and optical setup of the TSOLD experiment (upper). An optical beam from a nanosecond diode laser with a function generator illuminates the photosensitizer cuvette through a parabolic mirror and short-pass filters. The collected 1270 nm luminescence emission is coupled into an InGaAs-SPAD. TCSPC then generates time histograms of the 1O2 luminescence signal. (b) A photograph of the optical setup is shown (lower).
Antioxidants 14 00176 g002
Figure 3. Molecular structure of PpIX [28].
Figure 3. Molecular structure of PpIX [28].
Antioxidants 14 00176 g003
Figure 4. TCSPC histograms for 10 µg/g PpIX in ethanol with 10 min acquisition time using discrete band-pass filters showing the 1270 nm 1O2 luminescence peak and signal decay.
Figure 4. TCSPC histograms for 10 µg/g PpIX in ethanol with 10 min acquisition time using discrete band-pass filters showing the 1270 nm 1O2 luminescence peak and signal decay.
Antioxidants 14 00176 g004
Figure 5. TSOLD single-photon counting time curves (measured dots, fitted lines) at 1270 nm for 1–10 µg/g PpIX in (a) ethanol and (b) acetone. 10 min integration.
Figure 5. TSOLD single-photon counting time curves (measured dots, fitted lines) at 1270 nm for 1–10 µg/g PpIX in (a) ethanol and (b) acetone. 10 min integration.
Antioxidants 14 00176 g005
Figure 6. TSOLD single-photon counting time curves (measured dots, fitted lines) at 1270 for 1–10 µg/g PpIX at different concentrations in (a) BSA and (b) solid agarose. 15 min integration time.
Figure 6. TSOLD single-photon counting time curves (measured dots, fitted lines) at 1270 for 1–10 µg/g PpIX at different concentrations in (a) BSA and (b) solid agarose. 15 min integration time.
Antioxidants 14 00176 g006
Figure 7. Measured and fitted luminescence plots for 10 µg/g PpIX in (a) ethanol and (b) acetone at Intralipid concentrations up to 1% using a 10 min acquisition time.
Figure 7. Measured and fitted luminescence plots for 10 µg/g PpIX in (a) ethanol and (b) acetone at Intralipid concentrations up to 1% using a 10 min acquisition time.
Antioxidants 14 00176 g007
Table 1. Singlet oxygen and photosensitizer triplet-state PpIX lifetimes in ethanol and acetone.
Table 1. Singlet oxygen and photosensitizer triplet-state PpIX lifetimes in ethanol and acetone.
PpIX Concentration
(µg/g)
PpIX in EthanolPpIX in Acetone
Singlet Oxygen Lifetime
(µs)
PpIX Triplet-State Lifetime
(µs)
Singlet Oxygen Lifetime
(µs)
PpIX Triplet-State Lifetime
(µs)
1 13.8 0.10 47.9 0.16
314.4 0.13 48.2 0.21
514.6 0.14 48.3 0.27
814.40.18 48.4 0.17
1014.6 0.22 48.6 0.25
Table 2. Singlet oxygen and photosensitizer triplet-state PpIX lifetimes in BSA and solid agarose, as per Table 1.
Table 2. Singlet oxygen and photosensitizer triplet-state PpIX lifetimes in BSA and solid agarose, as per Table 1.
PpIX Concentration
(µg/g)
PpIX in BSAPpIX in Agarose-Based Solid Phantoms
Singlet Oxygen Lifetime (µs)PpIX Triplet-State Lifetime (µs)Singlet Oxygen Lifetime (µs)PpIX Triplet-State Lifetime (µs)
118.9 0.51 21.1 0.54
323.0 0.20 25.4 0.44
526.9 0.1927.5 0.38
828.4 0.17 28.8 0.36
1028.5 0.16 28.9 0.34
Table 3. Singlet oxygen and PpIX triplet-state lifetimes for 10 µg/g PpIX in ethanol and acetone with varying Intralipid concentration.
Table 3. Singlet oxygen and PpIX triplet-state lifetimes for 10 µg/g PpIX in ethanol and acetone with varying Intralipid concentration.
Intralipid Concentration
(%)
PpIX in EthanolPpIX in Acetone
Singlet Oxygen Lifetime (µs)PpIX Triplet-State Lifetime (µs)Singlet Oxygen Lifetime (µs)PpIX Triplet-State Lifetime (µs)
014.6 0.30 48.6 0.18
0.114.4 0.32 48.0 0.24
0.314.2 0.34 45.9 0.25
0.513.8 0.36 42.10.28
0.813.3 0.51 40.4 0.31
1.012.7 0.55 38.7 0.33
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vikas, V.; Yang, W.; Wilson, B.C.; Zhu, T.C.; Hadfield, R.H. Analysis of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Generated By Protoporphyrin IX. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14020176

AMA Style

Vikas V, Yang W, Wilson BC, Zhu TC, Hadfield RH. Analysis of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Generated By Protoporphyrin IX. Antioxidants. 2025; 14(2):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14020176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vikas, Vikas, Weibing Yang, Brian C. Wilson, Timothy C. Zhu, and Robert H. Hadfield. 2025. "Analysis of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Generated By Protoporphyrin IX" Antioxidants 14, no. 2: 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14020176

APA Style

Vikas, V., Yang, W., Wilson, B. C., Zhu, T. C., & Hadfield, R. H. (2025). Analysis of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Generated By Protoporphyrin IX. Antioxidants, 14(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14020176

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop