Next Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody and T Cell Response after a Third Vaccine Dose in Hemodialysis Patients Compared with Healthy Controls
Next Article in Special Issue
Seroprevalence of Pertussis in Adults at Childbearing Age Pre- and Post- COVID-19 in Beijing, China
Previous Article in Journal
Neutralizing Antibody Response to BBIBP-CorV in Comparison with COVID-19 Recovered, Unvaccinated Individuals in a Sample of the Pakistani Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immunogenicity of a Candidate DTacP-sIPV Combined Vaccine and Its Protection Efficacy against Pertussis in a Rhesus Macaque Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/vaccines10050693
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Immunogenicity upon Pertussis Booster Vaccination in Young Adults and Children in Relation to Priming Vaccinations in Infancy

by
Pauline Versteegen
1,2,*,
Axel A. Bonačić Marinović
1,
Pieter G. M. van Gageldonk
1,
Saskia van der Lee
1,3,
Lotte H. Hendrikx
4,
Elisabeth A. M. Sanders
1,3,
Guy A. M. Berbers
1 and
Anne-Marie Buisman
1,*
1
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
2
Public Health Service (GGD) of Utrecht, Department of Corona Vaccinations, P.O. Box 51, 3700 AB Zeist, The Netherlands
3
Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA Utrecht, The Netherlands
4
Department of Paediatrics, Bovenij Hospital, P.O. Box 37610, 1030 BD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2022, 10(5), 693; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050693
Submission received: 31 March 2022 / Revised: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bordetella pertussis Infection and Vaccination)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Booster vaccinations for pertussis are advised in many countries during childhood or adulthood. In a phase IV longitudinal interventional study, we assessed long-term immunity following an extra pertussis booster vaccination in children and adults. Children (9 years of age) were primed in infancy with either the Dutch whole cell pertussis (wP) vaccine (n = 49) or acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines (n = 59), and all children received a preschool aP booster. Adults (25–29 years, n = 86) were wP-primed in infancy and did not receive a preschool booster. All were followed-up for approximately 6 years. After the additional booster, antibody responses to pertussis were more heterogeneous but generally higher in adults compared with children, and additional modelling showed that antibody concentrations remained higher for at least a decade. Serologic parameters indicative of recent pertussis infection were more often found in aP-primed children (12%) compared with wP-primed individuals (2%) (p = 0.052). This suggests that the aP booster vaccination in aP-primed children offers less long-term protection against pertussis infection and consequently against transmission. Together, these data show that aP priming in combination with aP boosting may not be sufficient to prevent circulation and transmission, while wP-primed adults may benefit from enhanced long-lasting immunity.

1. Introduction

Pertussis is an infectious disease that may have a severe course and can be life-threatening, particularly in infancy [1]. Older adults and individuals with pulmonary comorbidities are prone to its complications [2]. The introduction of a whole cell pertussis (wP) vaccine in the 1940–1950s almost completely eliminated pertussis cases in countries with high vaccination coverage during the first decades after implementation [3]. Although global pertussis incidence is still decreasing, a resurgence in pertussis has been seen in many countries over recent decades, despite high vaccine coverage [4]. In the Netherlands, an increase in pertussis reporting began in 1996, presumably following the introduction, in the early 1990s, of a Dutch wP vaccine with low effectiveness [5,6]. Since then, several changes in the Dutch national immunisation programme (NIP) have been made (Table S1). Currently, acellular pertussis (aP) immunisations are advised at 3, 5, and 11 months of age and at 4 years of age but not for school aged children or adults.
Because of the reactogenicity profile of wP vaccines, many high-income countries switched to aP vaccines when these became available in the 1990s [7,8]. Next to the lower reactogenicity, the short-term immunogenicity based on humoral responses of the aP vaccines seemed superior compared with wP vaccines. Following the switch to aP vaccines, however, an increase in pertussis incidence was noted in many countries [9]. The Netherlands switched from wP to aP vaccines in 2005 and later observed an increase in reported disease incidence [6,8]. The increase was observed in children, adolescents, and adults who can serve as an important reservoir of pertussis circulation and may be the source of transmission to infants who need to be protected to avoid severe disease or death [10]. For this reason, many countries added aP booster doses not only at preschool age, but also for school-aged children, adolescents, adults, and older adults or specific target groups such as pregnant women, healthcare workers, and military conscripts [11,12,13,14].
Long-term immunogenicity studies that compare adolescent and adult immune responses to aP booster vaccinations are rare and in general show similar antibody kinetics [15,16]. However, some differences have been reported, with initially higher humeral responses against pertussis toxin (Ptx) in adolescents, while follow-up antibody concentrations against pertactin (Prn) were higher in adults. In both adolescents and adults, Ptx-specific antibody concentrations declined to almost pre-vaccination levels within 5 years, although in a prediction model, adult long-term antibody concentrations would remain above a presumed protective level of 20 international units (IU)/mL for over 9 years after aP booster vaccination in the case of wP-primed young adults [17]. In paediatric immunogenicity studies, aP- and wP-priming in infancy was compared after an aP booster vaccination at 4 years and an additional booster at 9 years of age. Higher Ptx and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibody concentrations one month post the additional aP booster vaccination in wP-primed children at age 9 years were reported [18]. The differences in Ptx and FHA IgG had disappeared one year post-booster vaccination.
Here we investigate differences in the long-term pertussis antibody concentrations after an additional aP booster vaccination at 9 years of age comparing aP- and wP-primed children. With respect to age, wP-primed children and wP-primed adults 25–29 years of age were followed-up until 6 years post the additional aP booster vaccination. These types of data provide information for vaccine policy concerning additional booster vaccinations in the current Dutch NIP to reduce infection, transmission, and the disease burden of Bordetella pertussis in the Netherlands.
Our data implies that extra aP pertussis booster vaccinations for aP-primed children offer only limited protection against infection and circulation of B. pertussis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

Two groups of healthy children and one group of adult participants included in this immunology study originated from three different interventional cohort studies in the Netherlands as previously described, with the flow scheme presented in Figure 1 [17,18,19]. For the present long-term follow-up study, a single additional sampling timepoint around 6 years post the study aP booster vaccination was added in all three study cohorts. Paediatric study participants were routinely primed in infancy with either the Dutch wP vaccine or different aP vaccines at 2, 3, 4 and 11 months of age. All children were aP-boosted at 4 years, and at 9 years of age received the additional study booster vaccine containing diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, pertussis toxoid, filamentous haemagglutinin, pertactin, and inactivated poliovirus (dTap3-IPV, Boostrix-IPV, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Rixensart, Belgium). This was in 2009 for wP-primed children and in 2013 for aP-primed children. Results of previous studies at baseline, 28 days post-vaccination and one-year post-vaccination are reported [18,19]. For the present study, a single additional blood sample was drawn by venepuncture 5 years and 8 months post-vaccination in wP-primed children (study number 2013-001864-50/NTR4089) and by fingerprick 6 years and 9 months post-vaccination in the aP-primed children (study numberISRCTN644117538) [18,19]. In addition, young adults, who were primed in infancy with the Dutch wP vaccine at 3, 4, 5 and 11 months without a booster at 4 years, received the study dTap3 booster (Boostrix, GSK) in 2014 at age 25–29 years. Data at baseline, day 14, day 28, 1 year, and 2 years post the aP booster vaccination are published [17]. For the current study, a single additional blood sample was collected by fingerprick 6 years and 3 months post the booster vaccination in these adults (study number 2013-005355-32/NTR4494) [17]. An overview of timelines and recruitment regions is provided in Figure S1, and the cumulative local disease notifications in the included regions at times of the studies can be viewed in Figure S2. All participants filled out a questionnaire at the last timepoint concerning information regarding self-reported, laboratory confirmed and/or clinically treated pertussis infection during the study and regarding extra pertussis vaccinations (i.e., a maternal aP booster) during the follow-up period (in addition to the study booster vaccination).

2.2. Serological Analysis

The small volumes obtained per participant were sufficient to measure serum IgG concentrations against Ptx (Netherlands Vaccine Institute (NVI)), Bilthoven, Netherlands), FHA (Kaketsuken, Kumamoto, Japan), Prn [20], diphtheria toxoid (Dtxd) (NVI), and tetanus toxin (Ttx) (T3194, Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and were quantified using a fluorescent-bead-based multiplex immunoassay (MIA) with independent duplicates, as previously described [21,22].
Briefly, the conjugated fluorescent microbeads were incubated with plasma or serum samples in two dilutions (200 and 4000), and a reference serum in a dilution series, and control sera on each plate. The measurement was performed using a BioPlex LX 200 combined with BioPlex Manager 6.2 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). To express antibody concentrations in international units (IU)/mL, an in-house standard, calibrated on the pertussis antiserum (human) 1st WHO International Standard, was used. For each analyte, the mean fluorescent intensity was converted to IU/mL by interpolation from a five-parameter logistic standard curve. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQs) was 0.85 IU/mL for Ptx, 0.82 IU/mL for FHA, 1.0 IU/mL for Prn, 0.001 IU/mL for Dtxd, and 0.001 IU/mL for Ttx. For Dtxd and Ttx, 0.1 IU/mL was defined as the cut-off of protection [23,24]. For IgG-Ptx, 20 IU/mL was defined as arbitrary cut-off for protection against clinical disease [25,26,27]. Pertussis infection at baseline was defined as IgG-Ptx ≥100 IU/mL in the absence of a recent vaccination which conforms to the Dutch pertussis infection diagnostic criterion using a single serum/plasma sample [28]. Infection during the study was defined as a three-fold increase in IgG-Ptx between the 1-year timepoint and the last timepoint, combined with IgG-Ptx ≥20 IU/mL at the last timepoint, which conforms to the Dutch pertussis infection diagnostic criterion using a paired serum/plasma sample [28].

2.3. Stastical Analyses

The primary outcome is the difference in IgG antibody concentration kinetics between the age groups and between the different priming vaccination backgrounds for pertussis toxin (Ptx), filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (Prn), diphtheria toxoid (Dtxd), and tetanus toxin (Ttx).
At all study timepoints, geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were calculated for the three cohorts. Additionally, the GMCs at the last timepoints were separately calculated for (1) participants who developed a pertussis infection during the study based on antibody concentrations as indicated in the serological analysis, (2) participants who received an extra vaccination during the study (in addition to the study intervention) indicated by the questionnaire, and (3) participants who did not get infected nor received an extra pertussis vaccine during the study. One participant was excluded from all analyses because antibody concentrations on multiple antigens did not match the questionnaire nor the patterns of the different antigens measured.
Predictions from a bi-exponential IgG antibody decay model was used to compare antibody decay rates among the cohorts [29,30,31]. This model gave insight in kinetics and offered us the possibility to calculate the estimated duration of protection. The model was fitted under a Bayesian statistical framework to the participant antibody data by using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations run with the sampling software JAGS, and interfaced with the R Statistical Software [32,33]. Pertussis antigen data from participants with a possible recent pertussis infection at baseline were excluded from the decay model because of potential recent infection at the start of the study (diagnostic criterion based on a single serum/plasma sample) [28]. The final datapoints from participants who became infected during the study and participants who received an extra vaccination during the study (based on the questionnaire) were also excluded from the decay model. Additionally, the last datapoint from participants who showed an increase in antibody concentration between the 1-year timepoint and the last timepoint were excluded from the decay model for the concerning antigen. Although they might not have met the criteria for pertussis infection using a paired serum/plasma sample, natural boosting with B. pertussis could not be excluded; an increase in diphtheria toxoid (Dtxd) and tetanus toxin (Ttx) could have been caused by a Dtxd and/or tetanus toxoid (Ttxd) containing vaccination, since this was not specifically asked in the questionnaire.
The proportion of individuals with protective antibody concentrations was calculated based on the decay model per study cohort based on a Ttx and Dtxd IgG-antibody concentration cut-off of 0.1 IU/mL against tetanus and diphtheria respectively, and an arbitrary cut-off of 20 IU/mL for pertussis toxin (Ptx) for the proportion with protective antibody concentrations against pertussis disease [23,24,25,26,27].
Serum/plasma infection prevalence during the study was also studied, including a 2-step risk analysis for contracting pertussis. Step 1: we included all participants to calculate a crude odds ratio to determine whether there were risk factors independently associated with an increased chance of contracting pertussis, using logistic regression analysis. All variables were first tested in a univariate model and variables with a p value < 0.1 were included in the multivariable model. By stepwise backward selection, variables independently associated with infection were identified. Step 2: to avoid the influence of age or priming vaccination background, significances found in the multivariable model were analysed using an appropriate statistical test comparing two out of three cohorts: either the acellular pertussis (aP) primed children to the whole cell pertussis (wP) primed children or the wP-primed children to the wP-primed adults.

3. Results

3.1. Geometric Mean Antibody Concentrations (GMCs) per Timepoint

To investigate differences in the long-term immunogenicity of an aP booster between age groups and vaccination backgrounds, we measured antibody GMCs in aP-primed children, wP-primed children, and wP-primed adults at baseline, 28 days, 1 year, and approximately 6 years post the aP booster vaccination. For adults, there were additional timepoints at 14 days and 2 years post the aP booster vaccination. Antibody GMC data are presented in Table 1 and the individual responses in Figure S3. Antibody concentrations in adults were highest 14 days post-vaccination for all antigens. Children showed the highest antibody concentrations 28 days post-vaccination; no blood was drawn at day 14. Approximately 6 years post-vaccination, GMCs still tended to be higher compared with baseline in all three study groups. Infection during the study was defined as a three-fold increase in IgG-Ptx between the one-year timepoint and the last follow-up timepoint after approximately 6 years, combined with IgG-Ptx ≥20 IU/mL at the last timepoint. Based on this definition, 12% (7/59) of the aP-primed paediatric cohort contracted pertussis between 1 year and 6–7 years post the booster vaccination in contrast to 2% (1/49) in the wP-primed paediatric cohort between 1 year and 5–6 years post the booster vaccination. No adults met the criterion for pertussis infection between 1 year and 6 years post the booster vaccination, while 21% (18/85) of adults received an extra pertussis vaccination during the study (in addition to the study intervention). This included vaccination during pregnancy, or incidentally was as a work-related requirement. In both paediatric cohorts, no additional pertussis vaccinations were reported, though in contrast to adults, all had been routinely aP-boosted at 4 years of age.

3.2. Antibody Kinetics

In Figure 2, we present model predicted antibody concentrations up to 10 years (120 months) post-vaccination for the five vaccine antigens. This was based on the majority of the participants’ individual datapoints over time until approximately 6 years post-vaccination, as presented in Figure S3. For all antigens, we observed an increase in antibody concentrations caused by vaccination which peaked within the first month post-vaccination, followed by a biphasic antibody decay with a rapid decline in the first phase, as described in previous studies, with 1-year follow-up and a slower decline in the second phase between 1 year and 6 years [17,18,19].
For Ptx, the initial peak was higher in wP-primed children and adults compared with aP-primed children (Figure 2a). The initial decline in both wP- and aP-primed children started early and resulted in similar antibody concentrations and antibody kinetics in both groups within a year after vaccination. Adults tended to have a slower decline in the second phase leading to a higher upkeep of Ptx antibodies over time, however, the distribution of antibody concentrations was more heterogeneous in adults at all times compared to children.
For FHA, the highest peak in antibody concentrations was seen in wP-primed adults, followed by wP-primed children, and was lowest in aP-primed children (Figure 2b). Antibody kinetics for wP- and aP-primed children were initially different. Children with a wP-priming background tended to have a slower initial decline, but the duration of decline seemed to be over a longer period compared with aP-primed children, resulting in similar concentrations between both groups from approximately 30 months (2.5 years) post the booster vaccination onwards. Adults had similar FHA antibody kinetics compared to aP-primed children, but since they started with higher peak concentrations, their antibody concentrations remain higher for a longer period.
The Prn antibody peak concentrations were similar for the three groups, but the initial and second decay phases were much slower in the adults compared to both paediatric groups (Figure 2c). Similar to the responses against FHA, the initial decline in Prn-specific antibody concentrations in wP-primed children was slower compared to aP-primed children with a longer duration, resulting in similar kinetics between wP- and aP-primed children from approximately 30 months (2.5 years) post-vaccination onwards.
The peak concentrations for Dtxd antibodies were slightly higher in adults, but the main difference between wP-primed adults and both paediatric groups is the extremely slow second decay phase leading to higher upkeep of antibodies in adults over time (Figure 2d).
For Ttx, antibody concentrations of only the wP-primed adults and children were compared since the aP-primed children received a Ttxd conjugated meningococcal vaccine during the study, which boosted their immune response to Ttxd (Figure 2e). Antibody decay differences between the adults and the children were similar to that of Dtxd, again showing an extremely slow second decay phase in the adult cohort compared to the children.

3.3. Proportion with Protective Antibody Concentrations

Figure 3 shows the modelled proportion of individuals protected against pertussis, diphtheria, and tetanus per cohort. The presumed protection against clinical pertussis (arbitrary cut-off of IgG-Ptx ≥20 IU/mL) over 10 years (120 months) is illustrated in Figure 3a. The height of the peak concentration as well as the speed of the initial fast decay and the second slow decay phase influenced the proportion of participants with protective antibody concentrations at a certain timepoint. This resulted in 50% of children with antibody concentrations already below the limit of protection against clinical pertussis in both paediatric cohorts around 1 year (12 months) post-vaccination, whereas in the wP-primed adults this 50% point was only reached around 7.5 years (90 months) post-vaccination.
The Dtxd antibodies illustrated in Figure 3b wane more slowly compared to the Ptx antibodies, and 50% of children (both aP- and wP-primed) were clinically protected (IgG-Dtxd ≥ 0.1 IU/mL) for approximately 4 years (48 months), while adults reach this 50% protection point after approximately 9 years (108 months).
The Ttx antibodies illustrated in Figure 3c barely declined in adults and started to decline after 5 years (60 months) in wP-primed children, resulting in almost 100% of adults still protected even after 10 years (120 months) and more than 75% of wP-primed children still protected. From the decay model, it can be calculated that the GMC of the wP-primed children reached the limit of clinical protection (IgG-Ttx ≥ 0.1 IU/mL) after 14 years and for adults only after 38 years.

3.4. Risk Factors to Contract Pertussis

From the questionnaires, it appeared that there were no clinically symptomatic cases diagnosed as pertussis reported in any of the three cohorts during approximately 6 years follow-up time. However, there appeared to be multiple participants who showed a three-fold increase in IgG-Ptx antibodies reaching at least 20 IU/mL during the study, pointing to pertussis infection according to the Dutch criterion based on a paired serum/plasma sample. Based on this definition, one participant became infected in the cohort of wP-primed children in contrast to seven in the cohort of aP-primed children, and no adults became infected. In Table 2, we performed a 2-step risk analysis. In step 1, a number of risk factors for contracting pertussis is listed and was used for logistic regression analysis on the entire cohort. Univariately tested aP priming, Ptx antibody concentrations <20 IU/mL at 1 year post-vaccination, and low FHA antibody concentrations 1 month post-vaccination predicted a higher risk of contracting pertussis. Using the multivariable model, only the type of priming vaccination was significantly associated with periods of pertussis infection. Individuals primed with aP vaccines in infancy had 11 times higher odds of contracting pertussis compared to wP-primed individuals. In step 2, we used a Pearson Chi-Square test to compare the proportion of infected children in the aP-primed cohort with the proportion of infected children the wP-primed cohort. Adults were not included in this analysis to avoid the influence of age. The risk of contracting pertussis almost reached significance (p = 0.052), though we cannot correct for differences in the follow-up time and the degree of exposure to B. pertussis.

4. Discussion

We set out to determine the long-term humoral immunity after an aP booster vaccination in both children and adults and compared the initial priming vaccinations in infancy in children. We found that pertussis antibody concentrations after an aP booster vaccination are higher in adults compared with children and antibody concentrations persist at a higher level for over a decade. Serological evidence of recent pertussis infection was more often found after aP-priming vaccinations in infancy compared with wP priming vaccinations.
Differences in antibody kinetics between wP-primed children and wP-primed adults with ultimately higher antibody concentrations in the young adults, are probably caused by the exposure to B. pertussis during life. Cumulative local pertussis disease notification data obtained from the RIVM indicates that the degree of exposure to B. pertussis during the study was highest in the wP-primed children cohort and lowest in the wP-primed adults. Nevertheless, the young adults had a longer life with more opportunity to become infected considering the high pertussis infection prevalence in the Netherlands [34]. These possible infections are likely to have boosted their immune systems and might explain the slower waning in antibodies in the young adults. The slow waning in Ptx antibody concentrations in adults has been previously described in a Danish study by Dalby et al. where they used a study vaccine that contained 20 µg Ptx, instead of 8 µg as in our study [35]. In contrast, Pool et al. observed fast waning in Ptx antibody concentrations in adolescents as well as in adults that were already almost back to pre-vaccination levels 5 years post-vaccination in a study in the USA [15]. From this we can assume that the antibody decay rate is multifactorially determined. The dose of the booster vaccine, but possibly also the dose and number of previous vaccinations, in combination with the frequency of natural boosting, will probably influence the antibody response and the decay rate.
Antibodies rapidly waned in the wP-primed paediatric cohort with ultimately comparable kinetics to aP-primed children. However, most of the wP-primed children, unlike aP-primed children, appeared to still be protected against infection during the follow-up, based on the serological defined cut-off of infection. In the aP-primed paediatric cohort, 12% met our serological criterion of pertussis infection after six years compared with 2% in the wP-primed paediatric cohort. The observed difference in the proportion of pertussis infected individuals in aP-primed children compared to the wP-primed children is close to significance (p = 0.052). This is in line with findings described in non-human primates, where aP priming compared with wP priming led to higher infectious susceptibility [36]. Therefore, protection in the long term is likely to be dependent not only on humoral immunity but also on cellular immunity, which has been suggested before, however, a correlate of protection against pertussis has not yet been established [37]. Previous reports regarding our two paediatric cohorts showed that aP-primed children had a higher proportion of IgG4 antibodies following aP boosting, indicating more Th2 skewing compared with wP-primed children [38,39]. One year post-booster vaccination, the difference in the proportion of IgG4 still existed. The higher proportion of IgG4 might be caused by the relatively lower T helper (Th) 1/Th2 ratio in aP-primed children [39]. A Th2-skewed response has frequently been described in aP-primed individuals in contrast to a more Th1/Th17-skewed immune response in wP-primed individuals [18,40]. In baboon studies, it has been shown that Th2 responses protect against clinical disease, but Th1 and Th17 responses are needed to protect against colonisation and transmission [36]. The Th2 skewing in our aP-primed children in combination with rapidly waning antibodies after the booster might have increased their vulnerability to infection.
A limitation of the study is the fact that other aspects may have affected the number of pertussis infections, such as a longer observation period in the aP-primed children compared to the wP-primed children (13 months later) and wP-primed adults (6 months later) (Figure S1). Humoral and cellular immunity may have waned more in the aP-primed paediatric cohort after a longer time compared to the wP-primed cohorts, possibly resulting in higher susceptibility to infection. We cannot discern the time of infection, either early or later, after the aP booster since we have only a single blood sample at the end of the follow-up. Furthermore, the cyclic pattern of pertussis outbreaks as well as the studies not being executed in the same period nor in the same municipalities, may have caused differences in pertussis exposure among the cohorts. In 2012 and 2014, the Netherlands experienced pertussis outbreaks where most disease cases were observed in adolescents [22]. Cumulative local pertussis disease notification data obtained from the RIVM indicates that exposure to B. pertussis during the study period was highest in the wP-primed children cohort, which is expected considering the most recent outbreaks, followed by the aP-primed children, and was lowest in the wP-primed adults. Therefore, the degree of pertussis circulation is unlikely to explain the serological differences associated with the proportion of infected participants in the three study cohorts. Taken together, not only priming vaccination background but potentially also in combination with the longer post-booster follow-up time, may have resulted in a higher proportion of infected individuals in the aP-primed paediatric cohort.
Some of the individuals that are aP-primed might form a reservoir for B. pertussis and transmit the bacterium to others. Since the proportion of aP-primed individuals in the population is increasing, additional population-wide boosters are unlikely to substantially increase the overall herd immunity to pertussis. If herd immunity is insufficient to achieve protection to vulnerable individuals such as infants and other risk groups such as individuals with pulmonary co-morbidity and older adults, these risk groups might benefit from an extra aP booster at the individual level [2]. Furthermore, certain groups who are prone to transmit infection, such as health care personnel and professionals working with very young children or vulnerable older adults, might benefit from an extra booster [36]. Since most professionals in the Netherlands are currently still wP-primed in infancy, an aP booster may offer reduced transmission by protecting professionals against infection. However, little is known regarding repeated boosters and their advantages or disadvantages [41].
Although some individuals in our study became infected, we had no reported pertussis cases in any of our cohorts. In the Netherlands, the number of reported cases in adolescents and young adults is quite low [6,34]. This might be an underestimation because pertussis generally presents less severe symptoms in adolescents and adults [42]. From a nationwide serosurveillance study in the Netherlands we know that serum infection prevalence in the studied age groups is approximately 200 times higher compared to the number of reported cases. Considering that only eight individuals in total became infected, it was not surprising that we did not find any symptomatic pertussis cases. Therefore, we cannot conclude from our data if an aP booster protects against the disease, however, from the literature it is known that aP boosters do protect against the disease in the short term in aP- and wP-primed individuals [43]. In the long term, aP-primed individuals are less protected against the disease compared to their wP-primed peers [44].
Antibody kinetics of our young adult cohort might be translatable to maternal vaccination since Huygen et al. found that pregnant and non-pregnant women respond comparably to an aP booster vaccine up to at least one year post-vaccination [45]. This means that we could expect the same major inter-individual variability in antibody responses between pregnant women as we have seen between our young adult participants. The current recommendation is to boost expectant women every pregnancy to induce high antibody concentrations necessary for sufficient transplacental transmission [46]. However, considering the slow decline in antibodies, it is questionable if all pregnant women would benefit from a booster at subsequent pregnancies, as some might still have very high antibody concentrations from a previous (maternal) booster. Determination of IgG-Ptx antibody concentrations early in pregnancy for every subsequent pregnancy after the first could help to substantiate whether expectant mothers would benefit from a subsequent booster. Since blood is already drawn early in pregnancy for several other (immunological) measurements such as lupus, this is not difficult to implement in the Netherlands.
Pertussis vaccines are always part of a multi-component combination vaccine, including at least Dtxd and Ttxd. Therefore, not only immunity against pertussis but also immunity against diphtheria and tetanus will be boosted. In line with our data and other studies, a decennial booster in adults seems adequate for diphtheria [47]. However, Ttx antibody concentrations decrease much more slowly and IgG-Ttx concentration seems sufficient for a much longer period. Furthermore, tetanus hyper-immunisation could lead to hypersensitivity responses [48,49]. Our results seem to substantiate a tetanus booster approximately every 35 years for adult individuals who participated in the NIP, in line with Hammarlund et al. who also found protective immunity against tetanus for more than 30 years [50]. Current recommendation in the Netherlands is to boost after possible exposure to tetanus if the last vaccination is more than 10 years ago [51]. Antibody concentrations of Ttx seem to decrease faster among children compared to young adults, and therefore, it seems reasonable to retain a 10-year interval after the booster at 9 years of age before the first possible exposure.
In conclusion, in this phase IV longitudinal interventional study, where we assessed long-term immunity following a pertussis booster vaccination in children and adults, we found heterogeneous but high antibody concentrations in adults. Children primed with aP vaccines had the highest prevalence of serologic parameters indicative of recent pertussis infection. Therefore, an extra aP booster vaccine does not seem to sufficiently protect against infection for more than 6 years after a booster vaccination in aP-primed school aged children. Since the proportion of aP-primed individuals is increasing in the population, it is not likely that the implementation of additional aP boosters after the previous preschool booster would reduce transmission of B. pertussis. Protecting risk groups seems most important, with the maternal vaccination as the most essential measure.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines10050693/s1, Figure S1: Timelines for the different study cohorts; Figure S2: Cumulative local pertussis disease notifications; Figure S3: Individual antibody concentrations; Table S1: B. Pertussis vaccine schedules and vaccines in the Netherlands.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.-M.B., G.A.M.B. and E.A.M.S., with input from L.H.H., S.v.d.L. and P.V.; methodology, A.A.B.M. and P.G.M.v.G., with input from L.H.H., S.v.d.L. and P.V.; software, A.A.B.M. and P.V.; validation, L.H.H., S.v.d.L., P.V. and P.G.M.v.G.; formal analysis, A.A.B.M. and P.V.; investigation, L.H.H., S.v.d.L., P.V. and P.G.M.v.G.; resources, L.H.H. and S.v.d.L.; data curation, P.V., S.v.d.L. and L.H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, P.V.; writing—review and editing, G.A.M.B., A.-M.B., A.A.B.M., S.v.d.L., L.H.H. and P.V.; visualization, A.A.B.M. and P.V.; supervision, A.-M.B., G.A.M.B. and E.A.M.S.; project administration, L.H.H., S.v.d.L. and P.V.; funding acquisition, A.-M.B. and G.A.M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment of the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport, The Netherlands.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United (NL44640.100.13, 22 July 2013, and NL47382.094.13, 6 March 2014) and the Central Committee in Research Involving Human Subjects (NL23149.000.08, 1 February 2009).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or parents involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the participants who participated at the additional timepoint 6 years post-vaccination. We also want to thank Natasha Kaagman for her help in the clinical trial management and the sample processing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cherry, J.D. Pertussis in Young Infants Throughout the World. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, S119–S122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kandeil, W.; Atanasov, P.; Avramioti, D.; Fu, J.; Demarteau, N.; Li, X. The burden of pertussis in older adults: What is the role of vaccination? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2019, 18, 439–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cherry, J.D. Historical review of pertussis and the classical vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 1996, 174 (Suppl. S3), S259–S263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jackson, D.W.; Rohani, P. Perplexities of pertussis: Recent global epidemiological trends and their potential causes. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014, 142, 672–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Health Council of the Netherlands. Vaccination against Pertussis; Health Council of the Netherlands: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 2004. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schurink-van ‘t Klooster, T.; de Melker, H. The National Immunisation Programme in the Netherlands: Surveillance and Developments in 2019–2020; Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM): Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lambert, L.C. Pertussis vaccine trials in the 1990s. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 209 (Suppl. S1), S4–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. David, S.; Vermeer-de Bondt, P.E.; van der Maas, N.A.T. Reactogenicity of infant whole cell pertussis combination vaccine compared with acellular pertussis vaccines with or without simultaneous pneumococcal vaccine in the Netherlands. Vaccine 2008, 26, 5883–5887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clark, T.A. Changing pertussis epidemiology: Everything old is new again. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 209, 978–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wiley, K.E.; Zuo, Y.; Macartney, K.K.; McIntyre, P.B. Sources of pertussis infection in young infants: A review of key evidence informing targeting of the cocoon strategy. Vaccine 2013, 31, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zoldi, V.; Sane, J.; Nohynek, H.; Virkki, M.; Hannila-Handelberg, T.; Mertsola, J. Decreased incidence of pertussis in young adults after the introduction of booster vaccine in military conscripts: Epidemiological analyses of pertussis in Finland, 1995–2015. Vaccine 2017, 35, 5249–5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cassimos, D.C.; Effraimidou, E.; Medic, S.; Konstantinidis, T.; Theodoridou, M.; Maltezou, H.C. Vaccination Programs for Adults in Europe, 2019. Vaccines 2020, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Haviari, S.; Bénet, T.; Saadatian-Elahi, M.; André, P.; Loulergue, P.; Vanhems, P. Vaccination of healthcare workers: A review. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2015, 11, 2522–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Voysey, M.; Kelly, D.F.; Fanshawe, T.R.; Sadarangani, M.; O’Brien, K.L.; Perera, R.; Pollard, A.J. The Influence of Maternally Derived Antibody and Infant Age at Vaccination on Infant Vaccine Responses: An Individual Participant Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017, 171, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pool, V.; Tomovici, A.; Johnson, D.R.; Greenberg, D.P.; Decker, M.D. Humoral immunity 10years after booster immunization with an adolescent and adult formulation combined tetanus, diphtheria, and 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine in the USA. Vaccine 2018, 36, 2282–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Squeri, R.; Genovese, C. Immunogenicity and antibody persistence of diphteria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination in adolescents and adults: A systematic review of the literature showed different responses to the available vaccines. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2020, 61, E530–E541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. van der Lee, S.; van Rooijen, D.M.; de Zeeuw-Brouwer, M.L.; Bogaard, M.J.M.; van Gageldonk, P.G.M.; Marinovic, A.B.; Sanders, E.A.M.; Berbers, G.A.M.; Buisman, A.M. Robust Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to Pertussis in Adults after a First Acellular Booster Vaccination. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. van der Lee, S.; Hendrikx, L.H.; Sanders, E.A.M.; Berbers, G.A.M.; Buisman, A.M. Whole-Cell or Acellular Pertussis Primary Immunizations in Infancy Determines Adolescent Cellular Immune Profiles. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schure, R.M.; de Rond, L.; Oztürk, K.; Hendrikx, L.; Sanders, E.; Berbers, G.; Buisman, A.M. Pertussis circulation has increased T-cell immunity during childhood more than a second acellular booster vaccination in Dutch children 9 years of age. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hijnen, M.; van Gageldonk, P.G.M.; Berbers, G.A.M.; van Woerkom, T.; Mooi, F.R. The Bordetella pertussis virulence factor P.69 pertactin retains its immunological properties after overproduction in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr. Purif. 2005, 41, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. van Gageldonk, P.G.M.; van Schaijk, F.G.; van der Klis, F.R.; Berbers, G.A.M. Development and validation of a multiplex immunoassay for the simultaneous determination of serum antibodies to Bordetella pertussis, diphtheria and tetanus. J. Immunol. Methods 2008, 335, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. van der Lee, S.; Stoof, S.P.; van Ravenhorst, M.B.; van Gageldonk, P.G.M.; van der Maas, N.A.T.; Sanders, E.A.M.; Buisman, A.M.; Berbers, G.A.M. Enhanced Bordetella pertussis acquisition rate in adolescents during the 2012 epidemic in the Netherlands and evidence for prolonged antibody persistence after infection. Euro Surveill. 2017, 22, 17-00011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. World Health Organization. Module 3: Tetanus. In The Immunological Basis for Immunization Series; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. World Health Organization. Module 2: Diphtheria. In The Immunological Basis for Immunization Series; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. Long, S.S.; Welkon, C.J.; Clark, J.L. Widespread silent transmission of pertussis in families: Antibody correlates of infection and symptomatology. J. Infect. Dis. 1990, 161, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sato, Y.; Sato, H. Anti-pertussis toxin IgG and anti-filamentous hemagglutinin IgG production in children immunized with pertussis acellular vaccine and comparison of these titers with the sera of pertussis convalescent children. Dev. Biol. Stand. 1985, 61, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Olin, P.; Hallander, H.O.; Gustafsson, L.; Reizenstein, E.; Storsaeter, J. How to make sense of pertussis immunogenicity data. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33 (Suppl. S4), S288–S291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mollers, M.; Ruijs, W.L.M. Kinkhoest Richtlijn. Available online: lci.rivm.nl/richtlijnen/kinkhoest (accessed on 19 September 2020).
  29. Slifka, M.K.; Antia, R.; Whitmire, J.K.; Ahmed, R. Humoral immunity due to long-lived plasma cells. Immunity 1998, 8, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Teunis, P.F.; van Eijkeren, J.C.; de Graaf, W.F.; Marinović, A.B.; Kretzschmar, M.E. Linking the seroresponse to infection to within-host heterogeneity in antibody production. Epidemics 2016, 16, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. van Ravenhorst, M.B.; Bonacic Marinovic, A.; van der Klis, F.R.; van Rooijen, D.M.; van Maurik, M.; Stoof, S.P.; Sanders, E.A.; Berbers, G.A. Long-term persistence of protective antibodies in Dutch adolescents following a meningococcal serogroup C tetanus booster vaccination. Vaccine 2016, 34, 6309–6315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Plummer, M. JAGS: A Program for Analysis of Bayesian Graphical Models Using Gibbs Sampling. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 20–22 March 2003; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  33. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. Versteegen, P.; Berbers, G.A.M.; Smits, G.; Sanders, E.A.M.; van der Klis, F.R.M.; de Melker, H.E.; van der Maas, N.A.T. More than 10 years after introduction of an acellular pertussis vaccine in infancy: A cross-sectional serosurvey of pertussis in The Netherlands. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2021, 6, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dalby, T.; Petersen, J.W.; Harboe, Z.B.; Krogfelt, K.A. Antibody responses to pertussis toxin display different kinetics after clinical Bordetella pertussis infection than after vaccination with an acellular pertussis vaccine. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 59, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Warfel, J.M.; Zimmerman, L.I.; Merkel, T.J. Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. PERISCOPE Consortium. PERISCOPE: Road towards effective control of pertussis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, e179–e186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. van der Lee, S.; Sanders, E.A.M.; Berbers, G.A.M.; Buisman, A.M. Whole-cell or acellular pertussis vaccination in infancy determines IgG subclass profiles to DTaP booster vaccination. Vaccine 2018, 36, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aalberse, R.C.; Stapel, S.O.; Schuurman, J.; Rispens, T. Immunoglobulin G4: An odd antibody. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. da Silva Antunes, R.; Babor, M.; Carpenter, C.; Khalil, N.; Cortese, M.; Mentzer, A.J.; Seumois, G.; Petro, C.D.; Purcell, L.A.; Vijayanand, P.; et al. Th1/Th17 polarization persists following whole-cell pertussis vaccination despite repeated acellular boosters. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 3853–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. McAlister, S.M.; van den Biggelaar, A.H.J.; Woodman, T.L.; Hutton, H.; Thornton, R.B.; Richmond, P.C. An observational study of antibody responses to a primary or subsequent pertussis booster vaccination in Australian healthcare workers. Vaccine 2021, 39, 1642–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Macina, D.; Evans, K.E. Bordetella pertussis in School-Age Children, Adolescents and Adults: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology and Mortality in Europe. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2021, 10, 2071–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wilkinson, K.; Righolt, C.H.; Elliott, L.J.; Fanella, S.; Mahmud, S.M. Pertussis vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2021, 39, 3120–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sheridan, S.L.; Frith, K.; Snelling, T.L.; Grimwood, K.; McIntyre, P.B.; Lambert, S.B. Waning vaccine immunity in teenagers primed with whole cell and acellular pertussis vaccine: Recent epidemiology. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2014, 13, 1081–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huygen, K.; Caboré, R.N.; Maertens, K.; Van Damme, P.; Leuridan, E. Humoral and cell mediated immune responses to a pertussis containing vaccine in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Vaccine 2015, 33, 4117–4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). RVP-Richtlijn Uitvoering Rijksvaccinatieprogramma. 2022. Available online: rijksvaccinatieprogramma.nl/professionals/richtlijnen/rvp-richtlijn-uitvoering (accessed on 6 February 2022).
  47. Berbers, G.; van Gageldonk, P.; Kassteele, J.V.; Wiedermann, U.; Desombere, I.; Dalby, T.; Toubiana, J.; Tsiodras, S.; Ferencz, I.P.; Mullan, K.; et al. Circulation of pertussis and poor protection against diphtheria among middle-aged adults in 18 European countries. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Aboud, S.; Matre, R.; Lyamuya, E.F.; Kristoffersen, E.K. Antibodies to tetanus toxoid in women of childbearing age in Dar es Salaam and Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2001, 6, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gentili, G.; D’Amelio, R.; Wirz, M.; Matricardi, P.M.; Nisini, R.; Collotti, C.; Pasquini, P.; Stroffolini, T. Prevalence of hyperimmunization against tetanus in Italians born after the introduction of mandatory vaccination of children with tetanus toxoid in 1968. Infection 1993, 21, 80–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hammarlund, E.; Thomas, A.; Poore, E.A.; Amanna, I.J.; Rynko, A.E.; Mori, M.; Chen, Z.; Slifka, M.K. Durability of Vaccine-Induced Immunity Against Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxins: A Cross-sectional Analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis 2016, 62, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. National Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control (LCI). Tetanus-Richtlijn. Available online: https://lci.rivm.nl/richtlijnen/tetanus (accessed on 6 February 2022).
Vaccines 10 00693 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow scheme. aP: acellular pertussis; wP: whole cell pertussis.
Figure 1. Flow scheme. aP: acellular pertussis; wP: whole cell pertussis.
Vaccines 10 00693 g001
Vaccines 10 00693 g002 550
Figure 2. Modelled IgG antibody concentrations from time of vaccination (0 months) up to 10 years (120 months) post-vaccination in acellular pertussis (aP) primed children, whole cell pertussis (wP) primed children, and wP-primed young adults, as the colours in the legend indicate. Modelled geometric mean IgG concentrations are shown (solid lines) with their respective 95% confidence interval (ribbons). Dashed lines show the range where 95% of most probable predictions lie. Datapoints underlying this model can be viewed in Supplementary Figure S2. Acellular primed children are missing in the tetanus toxin model because of interference from another (non-pertussis) vaccine in between the last two timepoints. IU: international units; Ptx: pertussis toxin; FHA: filamentous haemagglutinin; Prn: pertactin; Dtxd; diphtheria toxoid; Txt: tetanus toxin; IgG: immunoglobulin G. Modelled IgG antibody concentrations for (a): pertussis toxin, (b): filamentous haemagglutinin; (c): pertactin; (d): diphtheria toxoid; and (e): tetanus toxin.
Figure 2. Modelled IgG antibody concentrations from time of vaccination (0 months) up to 10 years (120 months) post-vaccination in acellular pertussis (aP) primed children, whole cell pertussis (wP) primed children, and wP-primed young adults, as the colours in the legend indicate. Modelled geometric mean IgG concentrations are shown (solid lines) with their respective 95% confidence interval (ribbons). Dashed lines show the range where 95% of most probable predictions lie. Datapoints underlying this model can be viewed in Supplementary Figure S2. Acellular primed children are missing in the tetanus toxin model because of interference from another (non-pertussis) vaccine in between the last two timepoints. IU: international units; Ptx: pertussis toxin; FHA: filamentous haemagglutinin; Prn: pertactin; Dtxd; diphtheria toxoid; Txt: tetanus toxin; IgG: immunoglobulin G. Modelled IgG antibody concentrations for (a): pertussis toxin, (b): filamentous haemagglutinin; (c): pertactin; (d): diphtheria toxoid; and (e): tetanus toxin.
Vaccines 10 00693 g002
Vaccines 10 00693 g003 550
Figure 3. The modelled proportion with protective antibody concentrations is based on the antibody decay model (Figure 2). For pertussis toxin, an arbitrary cut-off of protection of ≥20 IU/mL was used. For both diphtheria toxoid and tetanus toxin, the WHO cut-off for clinical protection of 0.1 IU/mL was used. Acellular primed children are missing in the tetanus toxin model because of interference from another (non-pertussis) vaccine in between the last two timepoints. aP: acellular pertussis; wP: whole cell pertussis. The modelled proportion with protective antibody concentrations for (a): pertussis; (b): diphtheria; and (c): tetanus.
Figure 3. The modelled proportion with protective antibody concentrations is based on the antibody decay model (Figure 2). For pertussis toxin, an arbitrary cut-off of protection of ≥20 IU/mL was used. For both diphtheria toxoid and tetanus toxin, the WHO cut-off for clinical protection of 0.1 IU/mL was used. Acellular primed children are missing in the tetanus toxin model because of interference from another (non-pertussis) vaccine in between the last two timepoints. aP: acellular pertussis; wP: whole cell pertussis. The modelled proportion with protective antibody concentrations for (a): pertussis; (b): diphtheria; and (c): tetanus.
Vaccines 10 00693 g003
Table
Table 1. Geometric mean concentrations calculated per cohort per timepoint.
Table 1. Geometric mean concentrations calculated per cohort per timepoint.
nGMC Ptx (95% CI)GMC FHA (95% CI)GMC Prn (95% CI)GMC Dtxd (95% CI)GMC Ttx
(95% CI)
Children aP-primed 1
Baseline837 (5–9)27 (23–33)36 (29–45)0.04 (0.03–0.05)0.35 (0.29–0.44)
28 days8368 (57–81)158 (140–179)307 (267–352)0.61 (0.49–0.75)7.44 (6.31–8.76)
1 year8019 (15–24)60 (50–71)99 (84–117)0.15 (0.12–0.19)1.94 (1.65–2.30)
6 years 9 months5914 (10–19)46 (38–57)46 (36–60)0.05 (0.04–0.07)3.69 (2.95–4.61) *
 6 years 9 months: infected7 (12%)57 (37–87)128 (80–202)84 (22–319)N/AN/A
 6 years 9 months: non-infected52 (88%)12 (8–16)41 (33–50)43 (33–55)N/AN/A
Children wP-primed 2
Baseline837 (5–10)34 (26–44)13 (10–18)0.05 (0.04–0.06)0.46 (0.38–0.56)
28 days81112 (91–139)282 (244–325)343 (275–429)0.88 (0.69–1.12)9.10 (7.90–10.5)
1 year7924 (18–30)105 (92–121)93 (70–124)0.19 (0.14–0.25)2.09 (1.78–2.45)
5 years 8 months4913 (9–18)34 (27–43)34 (24–47)0.07 (0.05–0.10)0.66 (0.52–0.82)
 5 years 8 months infected1 (2%)41 (–)183 (–)43 (–)N/AN/A
 5 years 8 months non-infected48 (98%)13 (9–18)33 (27–41)33 (23–47)N/AN/A
Adults wP-primed 3
Baseline1045 (4–7)11 (8–13)11 (8–14)0.09 (0.07–0.11)1.28 (1.07–1.53)
14 days103130 (94–179)408 (343–485)369 (277–492)1.56 (1.30–1.89)11.7 (10.1–13.5)
28 days102122 (93–161)341 (289–402)364 (275–483)1.27 (1.07–1.52)9.44 (8.36–10.7)
1 year10043 (33–55)133 (110–160)186 (136–253)0.35 (0.29–0.43)2.97 (2.63–3.34)
2 years9934 (26–44)109 (90–132)146 (107–199)0.24 (0.20–0.29)2.15 (1.90–2.43)
6 years 3 months8532 (25–43)72 (59–89)132 (97–180)0.23 (0.19–0.29)2.47 (2.13–2.86)
 6 years 3 months: extra vaccination18 (21%)84 (48–146)131 (92–187)214 (114–401)0.38 (0.22–0.65)3.69 (2.86–4.77)
 6 years 3 months: no extra vaccination67 (79%)25 (19–34)62 (49–78)116 (81–166)0.20 (0.17–0.25)2.21 (1.88–2.61)
If relevant, the group was additionally split up to represent infected individuals and/or participants who received an extra vaccination during the study in addition to the study intervention. 1 aP priming vaccinations at 2, 3, 4, and 11 months of age and aP-boosted at 4 years of age. 2 wP priming vaccinations at 2, 3, 4, and 11 months of age and aP-boosted at 4 years of age. 3 wP priming vaccinations at 3, 4, 5 and 11 months of age, no preschool booster. * Antibody concentrations increased because of meningococcal A, C, W, Y catch-up vaccination as the concerning vaccine contained tetanus toxoid conjugate. n: number; GMC: geometric mean concentration, Ptx: pertussis toxin; CI: confidence interval; FHA: filamentous haemagglutinin; Prn: pertactin; Dtxd: diphtheria toxoid; Ttx: tetanus toxin; aP: acellular pertussis; wP: whole cell pertussis; N/A: not applicable.
Table
Table 2. Risk factors for contracting pertussis.
Table 2. Risk factors for contracting pertussis.
n (%)N Recent Pertussis Infection (%)Univariate Crude OR (95% CI)p-ValueMultivariate Adjusted OR (95% CI)p-Value
Step 1: multivariable model with all participants combined
Sex0.322
Male79 (45%)5 (6.3%)Ref.
Female96 (55%)3 (3.1%)0.477 (0.110–2.063)
Age at inclusion0.997
9 years108 (62%)8 (7.4%)Ref.
25–29 years67 (38%)0 (0.0%)<0.001 (N/A)
Priming vaccinations 0.011 0.028
wP116 (66%)1 (0.9%)Ref. Ref.
aP59 (34%)7 (12%)15.481 (1.857–129.067) 11.061 (1.293–94.604)
Ptx < 20 IU/mL at 1 year 0.025 0.063
no102 (59%)1 (1.0%)Ref. Ref.
yes70 (41%)7 (10%)11.222 (1.349–93.380) 7.701 (0.895–66.294)
Antibody concentrations one moths post-vaccination
Ptx Ab at 1 month *1738 (4.6%)0.440 (0.123–1.577)0.208
FHA Ab at 1 month *1738 (4.6%)0.069 (0.005–0.877) 0.039
Prn Ab at 1 month *1738 (4.6%)0.618 (0.146–2.627)0.515
Ptx Ab at 1 year *1728 (4.7%)0.316 (0.087–1.146)0.080
FHA Ab at 1year *1728 (4.7%)0.088 (0.011–0.736) 0.025
Prn Ab at 1 year *1728 (4.7%)0.582 (0.168–2.019)0.148
Step 2: Pearson’s chi-squared test on priming vaccinations between aP- and wP-primed children (adults excluded)
wP-primed children49 (45%)1 (2.0%)N/A0.052
aP-primed children59 (55%)7 (12%)
* Added as a continuous variable. n: number; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; aP: acellular pertussis; wP: whole cell pertussis; Ptx: pertussis toxin; FHA: filamentous haemagglutinin; Prn: pertactin; Ab: antibody concentrations; N/A: not applicable.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Versteegen, P.; Bonačić Marinović, A.A.; van Gageldonk, P.G.M.; van der Lee, S.; Hendrikx, L.H.; Sanders, E.A.M.; Berbers, G.A.M.; Buisman, A.-M. Long-Term Immunogenicity upon Pertussis Booster Vaccination in Young Adults and Children in Relation to Priming Vaccinations in Infancy. Vaccines 2022, 10, 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050693

AMA Style

Versteegen P, Bonačić Marinović AA, van Gageldonk PGM, van der Lee S, Hendrikx LH, Sanders EAM, Berbers GAM, Buisman A-M. Long-Term Immunogenicity upon Pertussis Booster Vaccination in Young Adults and Children in Relation to Priming Vaccinations in Infancy. Vaccines. 2022; 10(5):693. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Versteegen, Pauline, Axel A. Bonačić Marinović, Pieter G. M. van Gageldonk, Saskia van der Lee, Lotte H. Hendrikx, Elisabeth A. M. Sanders, Guy A. M. Berbers, and Anne-Marie Buisman. 2022. "Long-Term Immunogenicity upon Pertussis Booster Vaccination in Young Adults and Children in Relation to Priming Vaccinations in Infancy" Vaccines 10, no. 5: 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050693

APA Style

Versteegen, P., Bonačić Marinović, A. A., van Gageldonk, P. G. M., van der Lee, S., Hendrikx, L. H., Sanders, E. A. M., Berbers, G. A. M., & Buisman, A. -M. (2022). Long-Term Immunogenicity upon Pertussis Booster Vaccination in Young Adults and Children in Relation to Priming Vaccinations in Infancy. Vaccines, 10(5), 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050693

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop