Next Article in Journal
In-Silico Molecular Modeling Studies to Identify Novel Potential Inhibitors of HPV E6 Protein
Next Article in Special Issue
SARS-CoV-2 Specific Humoral Immune Responses after BNT162b2 Vaccination in Hospital Healthcare Workers
Previous Article in Journal
Parental Willingness and Associated Factors of Pediatric Vaccination in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immunization of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Broodstock with Tilapia Lake Virus (TiLV) Inactivated Vaccines Elicits Protective Antibody and Passive Maternal Antibody Transfer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/vaccines10091454
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Maternal COVID-19 Vaccine May Reduce the Risk of MIS-C in Infants: A Narrative Review

by
Chetna Mangat
1,
Siva Naga Srinivas Yarrarapu
2,
Gagandeep Singh
3 and
Pankaj Bansal
4,*
1
Department of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic Health System, 733 W Clairemont Ave, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Monmouth Medical Center/RWJBH, Long Branch, NJ 07740, USA
3
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, 733 W Clairemont Ave, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA
4
Department of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic Health System, 1400 Bellinger Street, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2022, 10(9), 1454; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091454
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 29 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Response to Infection and Vaccination)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
COVID-19 infection in the pediatric population usually leads to a mild illness; however, a rare but serious complication of MIS-C has been seen in children. MIS-C usually presents 2–4 weeks after COVID-19 infection or exposure, and rare reports have been documented in neonates. Vaccinations for COVID-19 have been approved for children aged 6 months and above in the United States, and recent reports suggest significantly low prevalence and risk of complications of Multi-organ Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children. Vaccinations for COVID-19 are safe and recommended during pregnancy and prevent severe maternal morbidity and adverse birth outcomes. Evidence from other vaccine-preventable diseases suggests that through passive transplacental antibody transfer, maternal vaccinations are protective against infections in infants during the first 6 months of life. Various studies have demonstrated that maternal COVID-19 vaccination is associated with the presence of anti-spike protein antibodies in infants, persisting even at 6 months of age. Further, completion of a 2-dose primary mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series during pregnancy is associated with reduced risk for COVID-19–associated hospitalization among infants aged 6 months or less. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that maternal COVID-19 vaccination can reduce the risk of and severity of MIS-C in infants. In this article, we review the literature to support this hypothesis.

1. Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes relatively mild illness in children as compared to adults, and children usually recover without any adverse clinical course [1,2]. During this pandemic, an increasing incidence of Kawasaki-like disease has been seen in otherwise healthy children which is now termed multiorgan inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C). MIS-C is a rare but serious consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection which occurs 2–5 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection or exposure [3]. Most of the cases are reported in children aged 8 to 12 years but young children and even neonates are not spared this severe multi-organ inflammatory disease [4]. Cardiac complications are reported in 50% of the cases and due to the complicated course, most children who develop MIS-C require care in the intensive care unit (ICU) [5,6]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) started tracking MIS-C cases in May 2020 and since then, 8210 cases of MIS-C and 66 deaths due to MIS-C have been identified [7].
An increasing number of MIS-C cases in infants 0–6 months of age are being reported and most of the data is emerging in the form of case reports and case series. As per the latest systematic analysis, a total of 90 cases of MIS-C and MIS-N were identified in 0–6-month-old infants [8]. However, there is no formal definition of MIS-N, and this term is used by some clinicians for case identification in neonates born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers [8,9]. Both vertical and horizontal transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the proposed etiology for MIS-C in infants [8].
The COVID-19 vaccine is approved for children 6 months of age and above in the United States and it decreases the severe complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death [10]. There is growing evidence that MIS-C incidence is lower in vaccinated adolescents [11,12,13]. Further, hospitalization rates are lower in vaccinated children, and infants 0–6 months of age born to vaccinated mothers [14]. COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for pregnant females, and have been proven to be safe and effective in preventing COVID-19 incidence and its complications in pregnant mothers [15]. Transfer of IgG antibodies to infants after maternal vaccination has been well-documented for other vaccines, and these antibodies can persist in the infant beyond the neonatal period, providing protective effects in the infant [16]. It can therefore be hypothesized that maternal vaccination for COVID-19 can lead to transplacental transfer of IgG antibodies to the infant, and render protection against not only COVID-19 but also its complications, such as MIS-C in infants. In this article, we aimed to review the available literature that evaluated: (1) transplacental transfer of antibodies to the newborn and during early infancy after maternal COVID-19 vaccination, and (2) the risk of COVID-related hospitalization and MIS-C incidence in vaccinated children and infants born to mothers vaccinated during pregnancy.

2. Materials and Methods

Our search was aimed at identifying studies (1) evaluating transplacental transfer of antibodies to the newborn following maternal COVID-19 vaccination, and (2) evaluating the impact of COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization and MIS-C incidence in vaccinated children and infants born to mothers who were vaccinated during pregnancy. Data for this review were identified by searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, and references from relevant articles using the search terms “maternal”, “vaccine”, “vaccination”, “BNT162b2”, “Pfizer-BioNTech”, “mRNA-1273”, “mRNA”, “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “COVID-19”, “2019-nCoV” and “coronavirus”. Only articles published in English from inception to 18 May 2022 restricted to humans, and directly related to this review were included.

3. Results

3.1. Studies Evaluating Transplacental Transfer of Antibodies to Newborns and Young Infants after Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination

Our search yielded 19 studies that have thus far evaluated the transplacental transfer of antibodies after maternal vaccination (Table 1). Most of these case reports/case series and prospective cohort studies are reported from the United States and Israel. After a detailed review, all the studies demonstrated that anti-spike protein (anti-S) IgG antibodies were detected in the umbilical cord samples of neonates at birth after maternal vaccination. Trostel et al (2021) studied that these antibodies were positive in all the neonates at birth [17]. Interestingly, the fetal titers could reach the maternal level just after 15 days of the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, but neonates born to vaccinated parturients had higher antibody titers and prolonged protection compared to those born to infected parturients [18,19,20,21]. Vaccination in the third trimester and a booster dose in this trimester were also found to be associated with high maternal anti-spike IgG levels [22]. Six of the studies tested the neutralizing properties of transplacentally transferred maternal antibodies and revealed that the neutralizing capacity of neonatal sera was comparable to maternal sera, which could protect infants from SARS-CoV-2 infection and its complications [21,23,24,25,26].
The next question relates to the durability of these antibodies. Two of the studies evaluated the duration for which the transplacentally transferred maternal anti-S IgG antibodies were present in the infant. Shook et al. (2022) studied 77 vaccinated pregnant women and 12 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and tested the durability of these antibodies in both of these groups [27]. Vaccinated parturients had high titers at birth, with respective high levels in cord blood samples. Furthermore, these antibodies were positive in 98% of infants at 2 months of age and declined to 57% at 6 months of age, but compared to infants born to parturients with SARS infection in pregnancy, only 8% of these infants had positive titers at 6 months of age. Mangat et al. (2021) also reported case reports in which antibodies were persistently positive at 6 months of age, but the titers were declining [28].
Table
Table 1. Summary of studies showing the transplacental transfer of antibodies to newborns and early infants after maternal COVID-19 vaccination.
Table 1. Summary of studies showing the transplacental transfer of antibodies to newborns and early infants after maternal COVID-19 vaccination.
Author & YearStudy TypeLocationType of VaccineStudy GroupsTime of Vaccine in PregnancyMeasureResults
Beharier, 2021 [18]Prospective cohortIsraelBNT162b2
(2 doses)
(a)
Vaccinated parturients (n = 86);
(b)
PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected during pregnancy (n = 65)
(c)
Unvaccinated non-infected parturients (n = 62)
34.5 ± 7.5 weeksAnti-S and RBD antibodies in maternal blood and in umbilical cord blood (Sera Ig G and IgM)
(1)
Vaccination elicited strong maternal humoral IgG response
(2)
Maternal titers in the fetus attained within 15 days following the first dose.
Collier, 2021 [25]Prospective cohortIsraelBNT162b2 or MRNA-1273
(2 doses)
(a)
30 pregnant, 16 lactating, 57 neither pregnant nor lactating vaccinated women
(b)
22 pregnant and 6 non-pregnant unvaccinated women with SARS-CoV-2 infection
1st trimester (17%), 2nd trimester (50%), 3rd trimester (33%)Immunogenicity of the mRNA vaccines in pregnant and lactating women: median RBD and anti-S IgG and IgA antibody titers
(1)
Vaccination was immunogenic in pregnant women.
(2)
Vaccine-elicited antibodies were transported to infant cord blood and breast milk.
Kashani-Ligumsk, 2021 [19]Prospective cohortIsraelBNT162b2
(2 doses)
(a)
Women who were vaccinated during pregnancy (n = 29)
(b)
Infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy (n = 29)
(c)
Women not infected and not vaccinated (n = 21)
3rd trimesterTiters of anti-S IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in umbilical cord blood in vaccinated pregnant womenNeonates born to vaccinated parturients had higher antibody titers and prolonged protection compared to those born to infected parturients.
Shook, 2022 [27]Prospective cohortUnited StatesBNT162b2 or MRNA-1273
(a)
77 vaccinated pregnant mothers
(b)
12 pregnant women with natural SARS-CoV-2 infection
27 weeksPersistence of anti-S IgG in infants after vaccine vs. natural infection.Most infants had anti-S IgG persistently positive at 6 months of life.
Nir, 2021 [20]Prospective cohortIsraelBNT162b2
(2 doses)
(a)
64 vaccinated parturient women
(b)
11 parturient women who had COVID-19 during pregnancy
33.5 ± 3.2 weeks at second dosageRBD IgG antibodies in maternal blood and in umbilical cord bloodAntibodies detected in cord blood, newborn dried blood spot, and breast milk samples were higher in vaccinated women than in COVID-19-recovered women.
Gray, 2021 [21]Prospective cohortUnited StatesBNT162b2 or MRNA-1273
(2 doses)
(a)
Vaccinated (84 pregnant, 31 lactating, and 16 non-pregnant women)
(b)
Unvaccinated pregnant women (n = 37) with natural SARS-CoV-2 infection
23.2 weeks(IQR 16.3–32.1) Titers of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike and receptor-binding domain IgG, IgA, and IgM were quantified in participant sera and breastmilk
(1)
Robust IgG titers were observed across pregnant, lactating, and nonpregnant women, and were significantly higher than in pregnant women with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.
(2)
Immune transfer to neonates occurred via placenta and breastmilk.
Trostle, 2021 [17]Prospective case seriesUnited StatesBNT162b2 or MRNA-1273 (at least 1 dose)36 vaccinated pregnant women1st trimester (6%), 2nd trimester (83%), 3rd trimester (11%)Positive Anti-S IgG antibodies and negative anti-N IgG antibodies in maternal blood and umbilical cord blood
(1)
Transplacental antibody transfer following vaccination during pregnancy.
(2)
100% of cord blood specimens had high levels of anti-S antibodies.
Rottenstreich, 2021 [29]Prospective case seriesIsraelBNT162b2
(at least 1 dose)		20 vaccinated pregnant women3rd trimesterAnti-S and RBD IgG antibodies in maternal blood and umbilical cord blood
(1)
Vaccination during pregnancy was immunogenic, with transplacental antibody transfer
(2)
A positive correlation between maternal and cord blood antibody concentration was seen.
Mithal, 2021 [30]Prospective case seriesUnited StatesBNT162b2 or
mRNA-1273		27 vaccinated pregnant women33 ± 2 weeksTransfer of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies to infants
(1)
Pregnant women vaccinated during the 3rd trimester had transplacental antibody transfer.
(2)
Infant IgG levels were about equal to maternal levels.
Prabhu, 2021 [31]Prospective case seriesUnited StatesBNT162b2 or MRNA-1273
(at least 1 dose)		122 vaccinated pregnant womenNAAnti-S IgG antibodies in maternal blood and umbilical cord blood
(1)
All women and cord blood samples, except for one, had detectable IgG antibodies by 4 weeks after vaccine dose 1.
(2)
Timing between vaccination and birth may be an important factor to consider in vaccination strategies of pregnant women.
Yang, 2022 [22]Retrospective cohortUnited StatesBNT162b2
mRNA-1273
or Johnson		1359 vaccinated pregnant womenBoth in pre-pregnant state and pregnancyTransfer of maternal anti-S IgG in cord blood.Assess the association of prior infection and vaccine booster on anti-S IgG levels
(1)
Maternal anti-S IgG antibodies were detectable at delivery regardless of timing of vaccination
(2)
Highest antibody levels detected with 3rd trimester vaccination.
(3)
A booster dose in the 3rd trimester was associated with maternal anti-spike IgG levels greater than 3rd trimester vaccination in women with/without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cassaniti, 2021 [24]Retrospective cohortItalyBNT162b2
(2 doses)
(a)
2 vaccinated pregnant women
(b)
7 non-vaccinated controls with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy
31+4 and 27+6 weeksanti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG and IgA antibodies in pregnant women and newborns
(1)
Transplacental transfer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG at delivery after infection or vaccination.
(2)
Median neutralizing antibody titer was twofold reduced in newborns with respect to mothers.
Gloeckner, 2021 [26]Retrospective cohortGermanyBNT162b2 or MRNA-1273 after a prime vaccination with Oxford–AstraZeneca ChAdOx1
(a)
3 vaccinated pregnant women
(b)
25 vaccinated non-pregnant controls
NAanti-spike IgG antibody kinetics in pregnant women in comparison to their newborns, as well as to a healthy nonpregnant control group
(1)
Vaccination-induced immunogenic response in pregnant women showed no significant difference compared with non-pregnant controls 16 weeks after the initial vaccination.
(2)
Vaccination induced a strong passive humoral immunity in the newborns.
Zdanowski, 2021 [32]Retrospective case seriesPolandBNT162b2 (2 doses)16 vaccinated pregnant women31.8 ± 2.1 weeksAnti-S IgG antibodies in maternal blood and umbilical cord blood
(1)
Maternal immunization provided neonatal protection through the transplacental transfer of antibodies.
(2)
Antibody transfer was correlated with the time from vaccination to delivery.
Douxfils, 2021 [23]Case reportBelgiumBNT162b2
(2 doses)		1 vaccinated pregnant woman25 weeksanti-S IgG antibodies in umbilical cord blood compared to maternal blood
(1)
Successful maternal–fetal transfer of neutralizing antibodies.
(2)
Levels of neutralizing antibodies were 5-fold higher in the umbilical cord than in the maternal blood.
Gill, 2021 [33]Case reportUnited StatesBNT162b2
(2 doses)		1 vaccinated pregnant woman32+6 weeksIgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in maternal blood and umbilical cord bloodVaccination in pregnancy produced a robust immune response for the patient, with subsequent transplacental transfer of neutralizing antibodies.
Mangat, 2021 [28]Case reportUnited StatesBNT162b21 vaccinated pregnant woman22 and 26 weeksSerial anti-S IgG antibody titers in infantAntibodies in preterm infants were persistently positive at 6 months of age.
Mehaffey, 2021 [34]Case reportUnited StatesBNT162b2
(2 doses)		1 vaccinated pregnant woman29 and 32 weeksIgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in maternal and umbilical cord bloodVertical transmission of IgG SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies from a vaccinated mother to her son with no evidence of prior infection.
Paul, 2021 [35]Case reportUnited StatesMRNA-1273
(1 dose)		1 vaccinated pregnant woman36+3 weeksIgG SARS-CoV-2 in umbilical cord blood after maternal vaccinationSARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were detectable in a newborn’s cord blood sample after only a single dose of the vaccine.

3.2. Studies Evaluating the Risk of COVID-19-Related Hospitalization and MIS-C Incidence in Vaccinated Children and Infants Born to Mothers Vaccinated during Pregnancy

Our search yielded 10 studies in this section, including 5 case-control studies, 3 population-based surveillance studies, 1 prospective cohort, and 1 patient registry. Most of the studies are case-control studies from the United States.
Between June 1 and September 30, 2021, during Delta variant predominance, 2 doses of BNT162B2 were effective in reducing 93% of COVID-19-related hospitalizations among patients aged 12–18 years [36]. Comparison of the data during Delta and Omicron predominance showed that COVID-19 vaccination decreased the hospitalization rate during the Omicron surge from 93 to 79% in the 12–18 age group, whereas vaccine effectiveness (VE) against hospitalization among children 5 to 11 years of age was 68%, for which the data is available only during the Omicron surge [37]. From April 2021 to January 2022, VE against hospitalization in the 5-to-11-year age group was 78% but VE was reduced in older children when the 2nd dose of vaccine was given >150 days from infection [38]. Furthermore, completion of 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy showed VE of 61% against hospitalization in infants 0–6 months of age [14]. On the other hand, an increased hospitalization rate was noted in children 1–4 years of age during the Omicron surge, as the vaccination was not available for this age group during that time [39].
Receipt of 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine showed protection against MIS-C, which is a life-threatening complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children aged 12–18 years (July–December 2021) with estimated effectiveness of 91% against MIS-C, and along with this, MIS-C complications were also decreased in vaccinated children, and all MIS-C patients requiring life support were unvaccinated [11]. Studies from France reported similar findings, in which decreased MIS-C likelihood was noted after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (From 1 September 2021 to 31 October 2021) [12]. Oduldali et al. (2022) reported that the risk of MIS-C in children 12–17 years of age in France was significantly lower after vaccination (1.5 per 1,000,000 doses of COVID-19 vaccine) as compared to the risk of MIS-C due to infection by SARS-CoV-2 (113 per 1,000,000 infected by SARS-CoV-2) [13].
Approved vaccine for children 12–18 is available in the USA since May 2021, and for children 5–11 years of age it has been available since November 2021 [40]. Vaccination has been found to be safe and effective and is being administered under the most intensive vaccine safety surveillance effort in history. Based on benefit-risk assessment, it’s estimated that approximately 1000 COVID-19 hospitalizations may have been prevented during the Omicron surge among fully vaccinated children ages 5–11 years, in the United States [41] (Table 2).
At the time of writing this paper, no study is available that has examined MIS-C in vaccinated younger children aged 5–11 years, although the vaccine has been available for this group since November 2021 in the United States. Risk of MIS-C has also not been examined yet in infants born to vaccinated mothers.

4. Discussion

CDC defines MIS-C as an individual aged less than 21 years presenting with fever, laboratory evidence of inflammation, and evidence of clinically severe illness requiring hospitalization, with more than two organ involvement with no alternative plausible diagnoses, and with current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 exposure within the 4 weeks prior to the onset of symptoms. [44] Most cases of MIS-C are clustered in the 8–11-year age group and the number of cases in neonates and infants reported thus far has been low [7] In a systematic meta-analysis, DeRose et al. (2022) analyzed 48 studies, which include 29 case reports, 6 case series and 13 cohort studies [8]. They identified 25 papers, which included a total of 32 cases of MIS-C in the form of case studies in infants aged 0–6 months. Additionally, 31 infants 0–6 months of age with MIS-C were identified in 12 existing cohort studies, which included a total of 1062 children 0–18 years old. The youngest case of MIS-C reported was in a 7-day-old infant [45]. MIS-N is the definition proposed by some clinicians for infants born to mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection, but there is no formal definition of MIS-N. Based on this proposed definition, Del Rose et al. (2022) identified 33 neonates with MIS-N and interestingly, only 18.2% had fever as compared to fever as a major criterion in the diagnosis of MIS-C in children [8]. The true incidence of MIS-C is not known. Based on a multicenter study of a large cohort in the United States, the cumulative incidence of MIS-C in those younger than 21 years of age was 2.1 per 100,000 persons, with a mortality rate of 1.4% [4]. Incidence in newborns and infants is unknown due to scarcity of data and difficulty in diagnosis as newborns could be afebrile, and due to many overlapping symptoms, it can be difficult to differentiate MIS-C from sepsis in early infancy [8]. Although there are only a few cases reported so far, risk of cardiac complications and critical illness is high in this population, with very a high mortality of 12.5% reported in infants 0–6 months of age [4,8].
MIS-C is temporally associated with current or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, but the exact pathogenesis of MIS-C is not fully understood. Available literature proposes the multilineage activation of the immune system, which includes both innate and adaptive signatures [46]. Viral load at the time of MIS-C diagnosis is lower, and it has been hypothesized to be an autoimmune and hyperinflammatory response to the initial infection. High levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interferon alpha and gamma, and interleukin (IL) -1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-17, are reported but no pathognomonic marker has yet been identified [47,48]. Decreased expression of angiotensin convertase enzyme (ACE) receptors in early infancy and predominantly stronger innate immune response with less adaptive immune development are the proposed reasons behind the decreased incidence of severe COVID-19 infection and eventually, the development of MIS-C in infants.
The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in children > 5 years of age has been well documented. Further, a multistate study from the US hospital network by Zambrano et al. (2022) revealed that receipt of 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was associated with protection against MIS-C in patients aged 12–18 years. The likelihood of developing MIS-C was 91% less in vaccinated children, and vaccinated children who developed MIS-C were less likely to develop respiratory or cardiac complications [11]. Similar studies from France also revealed a lower incidence of MISC-C in vaccinated children [12,13].
Our review identified several studies that have documented transplacental transfer of antibodies following maternal COVID-19 vaccination and a reduced risk of hospitalization related to COVID-19 in infants 0–6 months of age. Further, these antibodies can persist in infants up to 6 months of age, after which, a decline in their titers was reported [14,28]. It is unknown if the risk of COVID-19 and its complications increases corresponding to the decline in titers of these antibodies after 6 months or not. The risk of MIS-C in infants born to vaccinated mothers has not been extensively evaluated. Maternal vaccination leads to anti-spike protein IgG antibody production in maternal circulation, which then gets passively transferred to the fetus through transplacental transport and is detected in newborns after birth and early infancy and has a neutralizing effect against COVID-19 infection and its complications, including MIS-C [17,23,28,31] (Figure 1).
Vaccination for children in the 6 months through 4 years age group was recently approved, but so far, it is unknown if and when a vaccine for infants 0–6 months will be available. Our review supports the evidence that maternal COVID-19 vaccination could provide protection to the infant in the first 6 months of life, as seen with other recommended vaccines during pregnancy, e.g., Tdap and influenza, which have been successful in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with these infections in infants [16].
Our review has many limitations. Due to heterogeneity of the available studies, a quantitative analysis could not be performed. Since the search was limited to English only and was not systematic, some studies could have been missed. Most of the available studies were case reports or case series, and thus, the level of evidence is low. Further, well-conducted randomized clinical trials can strengthen the evidence and provide clearer information about the risk of MIS-C in infants following maternal vaccination for COVID-19.

5. Conclusions

Maternal vaccination for COVID-19 may be effective in rendering passive immunity to infants under 6 months of age. There is emerging evidence that it can prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and its complications, and hence, the life-threatening consequence of MIS-C in infants < 6 months. The data is still premature and further studies can elicit the exact impact and timing of vaccination during pregnancy on the risk of MIS-C in infants.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study design, critically reviewed the first draft, approved the final version, and agreed to be accountable for the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. C.M. and P.B. were involved in the initial conception and design of the study. S.N.S.Y. and G.S. were involved in the literature search, table creation and analysis. C.M. and P.B. wrote the first draft of the study. S.N.S.Y., G.S. and P.B. provided critical review and revision of the manuscript for intellectual content and contributed to the final draft. All authors (C.M., S.N.S.Y., G.S., and P.B.) agree to be accountable for the work and have full access to the manuscript and all the data in the study. All authors (C.M., S.N.S.Y., G.S. and P.B.) controlled the decision to publish. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

There was no funding for the work associated with this publication. None of the authors have been paid by any agency or pharmaceutical company to write this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bailey, L.C.; Razzaghi, H.; Burrows, E.K.; Bunnell, H.T.; Camacho, P.E.F.; Christakis, D.A.; Eckrich, D.; Kitzmiller, M.; Lin, S.M.; Magnusen, B.C.; et al. Assessment of 135 794 Pediatric Patients Tested for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Across the United States. JAMA Pediatr. 2021, 175, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wanga, V.; Gerdes, M.E.; Shi, D.S.; Choudhary, R.; Dulski, T.M.; Hsu, S.; Idubor, O.I.; Webber, B.J.; Wendel, A.M.; Agathis, N.T.; et al. Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Children and Adolescents Aged <18 Years Hospitalized with COVID-19—Six Hospitals, United States, July-August 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1766–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Feldstein, L.R.; Tenforde, M.W.; Friedman, K.G.; Newhams, M.; Rose, E.B.; Dapul, H.; Soma, V.L.; Maddux, A.B.; Mourani, P.M.; Bowens, C.; et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of US Children and Adolescents With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Compared With Severe Acute COVID-19. JAMA 2021, 325, 1074–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Belay, E.D.; Abrams, J.; Oster, M.E.; Giovanni, J.; Pierce, T.; Meng, L.; Prezzato, E.; Balachandran, N.; Openshaw, J.J.; Rosen, H.E.; et al. Trends in Geographic and Temporal Distribution of US Children With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Pediatr. 2021, 175, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Son, M.B.F.; Murray, N.; Friedman, K.; Young, C.C.; Newhams, M.M.; Feldstein, L.R.; Loftis, L.L.; Tarquinio, K.M.; Singh, A.R.; Heidemann, S.M.; et al. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children—Initial Therapy and Outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alsaied, T.; Tremoulet, A.H.; Burns, J.C.; Saidi, A.; Dionne, A.; Lang, S.M.; Newburger, J.W.; de Ferranti, S.; Friedman, K.G. Review of Cardiac Involvement in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. Circulation 2021, 143, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. CDC, COVID Data Tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#mis-national-surveillance (accessed on 30 April 2022).
  8. De Rose, D.U.; Pugnaloni, F.; Calì, M.; Ronci, S.; Caoci, S.; Maddaloni, C.; Martini, L.; Santisi, A.; Dotta, A.; Auriti, C. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Neonates Born to Mothers with SARS-CoV-2 Infection (MIS-N) and in Neonates and Infants Younger Than 6 Months with Acquired COVID-19 (MIS-C): A Systematic Review. Viruses 2022, 14, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pawar, R.; Gavade, V.; Patil, N.; Mali, V.; Girwalkar, A.; Tarkasband, V.; Loya, S.; Chavan, A.; Nanivadekar, N.; Shinde, R.; et al. Neonatal Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-N) Associated with Prenatal Maternal SARS-CoV-2: A Case Series. Children 2021, 8, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Federal Drug Administration. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech VCOVID-19 Vaccines for Children Down to 6 Months of Age. 2022. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-moderna-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccines-children (accessed on 16 August 2022).
  11. Zambrano, L.D.; Newhams, M.M.; Olson, S.M.; Halasa, N.B.; Price, A.M.; Boom, J.A.; Sahni, L.C.; Kamidani, S.; Tarquinio, K.M.; Maddux, A.B.; et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA Vaccination Against Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Among Persons Aged 12-18 Years—United States, July-December 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Levy, M.; Recher, M.; Hubert, H.; Javouhey, E.; Fléchelles, O.; Leteurtre, S.; Angoulvant, F. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children by COVID-19 Vaccination Status of Adolescents in France. JAMA 2022, 327, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ouldali, N.; Bagheri, H.; Salvo, F.; Antona, D.; Pariente, A.; Leblanc, C.; Tebacher, M.; Micallef, J.; Levy, C.; Cohen, R.; et al. Hyper inflammatory syndrome following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in children: A national post-authorization pharmacovigilance study. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2022, 17, 100393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Halasa, N.B.; Olson, S.M.; Staat, M.A.; Newhams, M.M.; Price, A.M.; Boom, J.A.; Sahni, L.C.; Cameron, M.A.; Pannaraj, P.S.; Bline, K.E.; et al. Effectiveness of Maternal Vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy Against COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization in Infants Aged <6 Months—17 States, July 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shimabukuro, T.T.; Kim, S.Y.; Myers, T.R.; Moro, P.L.; Oduyebo, T.; Panagiotakopoulos, L.; Marquez, P.L.; Olson, C.K.; Liu, R.; Chang, K.T.; et al. Preliminary Findings of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2273–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Marchant, A.; Sadarangani, M.; Garand, M.; Dauby, N.; Verhasselt, V.; Pereira, L.; Bjornson, G.; Jones, C.E.; Halperin, S.A.; Edwards, K.M.; et al. Maternal immunisation: Collaborating with mother nature. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e197–e208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Trostle, M.E.; Aguero-Rosenfeld, M.E.; Roman, A.S.; Lighter, J.L. High antibody levels in cord blood from pregnant women vaccinated against COVID-19. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2021, 3, 100481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Beharier, O.; Plitman Mayo, R.; Raz, T.; Nahum Sacks, K.; Schreiber, L.; Suissa-Cohen, Y.; Chen, R.; Gomez-Tolub, R.; Hadar, E.; Gabbay-Benziv, R. Efficient maternal to neonatal transfer of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. J. Clin. Invest. 2021, 131, e150319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kashani-Ligumsky, L.; Lopian, M.; Cohen, R.; Senderovich, H.; Czeiger, S.; Halperin, A.; Chaim, A.B.; Kremer, I.; Lessing, J.B.; Somekh, E.; et al. Titers of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in cord blood of neonates whose mothers contracted SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) during pregnancy and in those whose mothers were vaccinated with mRNA to SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. J. Perinatol. 2021, 41, 2621–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nir, O.; Schwartz, A.; Toussia-Cohen, S.; Leibovitch, L.; Strauss, T.; Asraf, K.; Doolman, R.; Sharabi, S.; Cohen, C.; Lustig, Y.; et al. Maternal-neonatal transfer of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibodies among parturient women treated with BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2022, 4, 100492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gray, K.J.; Bordt, E.A.; Atyeo, C.; Deriso, E.; Akinwunmi, B.; Young, N.; Baez, A.M.; Shook, L.L.; Cvrk, D.; James, K.; et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine response in pregnant and lactating women: A cohort study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 225, e1–e303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, Y.J.; Murphy, E.A.; Singh, S.; Sukhu, A.C.; Wolfe, I.; Adurty, S.; Eng, D.; Yee, J.; Mohammed, I.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Association of Gestational Age at Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination, History of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection, and a Vaccine Booster Dose With Maternal and Umbilical Cord Antibody Levels at Delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 139, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Douxfils, J.; Gillot, C.; De Gottal, É.; Vandervinne, S.; Bayart, J.L.; Dogné, J.M.; Favresse, J. Efficient Maternal to Neonate Transfer of Neutralizing Antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination with BNT162b2: A Case-Report and Discussion of the Literature. Vaccines 2021, 9, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cassaniti, I.; Percivalle, E.; Zelini, P.; Ngaradoumbe Nanhorngue, K.; Parolo, A.; Bernardi, V.; Jorizzo, G.; Santer, P.; Perotti, F.; Spinillo, A.; et al. Both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in pregnancy elicited neutralizing antibodies in pregnant women and newborns. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021, 27, 1708–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Collier, A.Y.; McMahan, K.; Yu, J.; Tostanoski, L.H.; Aguayo, R.; Ansel, J.; Chandrashekar, A.; Patel, S.; Apraku Bondzie, E.; Sellers, D.; et al. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Pregnant and Lactating Women. JAMA 2021, 325, 2370–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gloeckner, S.; Hornung, F.; Heimann, Y.; Schleussner, E.; Deinhardt-Emmer, S.; Loeffler, B.; Zoellkau, J. Newborns’ passive humoral SARS-CoV-2 immunity following heterologous vaccination of the mother during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 226, 261–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shook, L.L.; Atyeo, C.G.; Yonker, L.M.; Fasano, A.; Gray, K.J.; Alter, G.; Edlow, A.G. Durability of Anti-Spike Antibodies in Infants After Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination or Natural Infection. JAMA 2022, 327, 1087–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mangat, C.; Milosavljevic, N. BNT162b2 Vaccination during Pregnancy Protects Both the Mother and Infant: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S Antibodies Persistently Positive in an Infant at 6 Months of Age. Case Rep. Pediatr. 2021, 2021, 6901131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rottenstreich, A.; Zarbiv, G.; Oiknine-Djian, E.; Zigron, R.; Wolf, D.G.; Porat, S. Efficient Maternofetal Transplacental Transfer of Anti- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike Antibodies After Antenatal SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 1909–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mithal, L.B.; Otero, S.; Shanes, E.D.; Goldstein, J.A.; Miller, E.S. Cord blood antibodies following maternal coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 192–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prabhu, M.; Murphy, E.A.; Sukhu, A.C.; Yee, J.; Singh, S.; Eng, D.; Zhao, Z.; Riley, L.E.; Yang, Y.J. Antibody Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Messenger RNA Vaccination in Pregnant Women and Transplacental Passage Into Cord Blood. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 138, 278–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zdanowski, W.; Waśniewski, T. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Antibody Titers in Cord Blood after COVID-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy in Polish Healthcare Workers: Preliminary Results. Vaccines 2021, 9, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gill, L.; Jones, C.W. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antibodies in Neonatal Cord Blood After Vaccination in Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 137, 894–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mehaffey, J.H.; Arnold, M.; Huffstetler, E.; Mehaffey, R.L.; Quillian, H.; Mehaffey, J.H. Successful vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after maternal vaccination. Birth 2021, 48, 451–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Paul, G.; Chad, R. Newborn antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 detected in cord blood after maternal vaccination—A case report. BMC Pediatr. 2021, 21, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Olson, S.M.; Newhams, M.M.; Halasa, N.B.; Price, A.M.; Boom, J.A.; Sahni, L.C.; Irby, K.; Walker, T.C.; Schwartz, S.P.; Pannaraj, P.S.; et al. Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA Vaccination Against COVID-19 Hospitalization Among Persons Aged 12-18 Years—United States, June-September 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1483–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Price, A.M.; Olson, S.M.; Newhams, M.M.; Halasa, N.B.; Boom, J.A.; Sahni, L.C.; Pannaraj, P.S.; Irby, K.; Bline, K.E.; Maddux, A.B.; et al. BNT162b2 Protection against the Omicron Variant in Children and Adolescents. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1899–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Klein, N.P.; Stockwell, M.S.; Demarco, M.; Gaglani, M.; Kharbanda, A.B.; Irving, S.A.; Rao, S.; Grannis, S.J.; Dascomb, K.; Murthy, K.; et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination in Preventing COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Nonimmunocompromised Children and Adolescents Aged 5-17 Years—VISION Network, 10 States, April 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 352–358. [Google Scholar]
  39. Marks, K.J.; Whitaker, M.; Agathis, N.T.; Anglin, O.; Milucky, J.; Patel, K.; Pham, H.; Kirley, P.D.; Kawasaki, B.; Meek, J.; et al. Hospitalization of Infants and Children Aged 0-4 Years with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19—COVID-NET, 14 States, March 2020-February 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine. 2021. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccineexternal (accessed on 1 May 2022).
  41. Oliver, S.E.; Wallace, M.; Link-Gelles, R. COVID-19 Vaccines: Safe and Effective in Children Ages 5-11 Years. Pediatrics 2022, 150, e2022057314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fowlkes, A.L.; Yoon, S.K.; Lutrick, K.; Gwynn, L.; Burns, J.; Grant, L.; Phillips, A.L.; Ellingson, K.; Ferraris, M.V.; LeClair, L.B.; et al. Effectiveness of 2-Dose BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) mRNA Vaccine in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children Aged 5-11 Years and Adolescents Aged 12-15 Years—PROTECT Cohort, July 2021-February 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, D.S.; Whitaker, M.; Marks, K.J.; Anglin, O.; Milucky, J.; Patel, K.; Pham, H.; Chai, S.J.; Kawasaki, B.; Meek, J.; et al. Hospitalizations of Children Aged 5-11 Years with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19—COVID-NET, 14 States, March 2020-February 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. CDC Case Definition for MIS-C. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mis/mis-c/hcp/index.html (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  45. Diggikar, S.; Nanjegowda, R.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, V.; Kulkarni, S.; Venkatagiri, P. Neonatal Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2021, 58, 900–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bohn, M.K.; Yousef, P.; Steele, S.; Sepiashvili, L.; Adeli, K. MultiInflammatory Syndrome in Children: A View into Immune Pathogenesis from a Laboratory Perspective. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 2022, 7, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ramaswamy, A.; Brodsky, N.N.; Sumida, T.S.; Comi, M.; Asashima, H.; Hoehn, K.B.; Li, N.; Liu, Y.; Shah, A.; Ravindra, N.G.; et al. Immune dysregulation and autoreactivity correlate with disease severity in SARS-CoV-2-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Immunity 2021, 54, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Moreews, M.; Le Gouge, K.; Khaldi-Plassart, S.; Pescarmona, R.; Mathieu, A.L.; Malcus, C.; Djebali, S.; Bellomo, A.; Dauwalder, O.; Perret, M.; et al. Polyclonal expansion of TCR Vbeta 21.3(+) CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells is a hallmark of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. Sci. Immunol. 2021, 6, eabh1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vaccines 10 01454 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed hypothesis for reducing the risk of MIS-C in infants after material COVID-19 vaccination. (Created with BioRender.com) access date 25th May 2022.
Figure 1. Proposed hypothesis for reducing the risk of MIS-C in infants after material COVID-19 vaccination. (Created with BioRender.com) access date 25th May 2022.
Vaccines 10 01454 g001
Table
Table 2. Summary of studies showing the decrease in COVID-19-related hospitalization and MIS-C incidence in vaccinated children and infants born to mothers vaccinated during pregnancy.
Table 2. Summary of studies showing the decrease in COVID-19-related hospitalization and MIS-C incidence in vaccinated children and infants born to mothers vaccinated during pregnancy.
AuthorCountryType of Studyn: Study Group vs. Control Group (if Any)AgeInterventionStudy PeriodMeasureResults:
Olson, 2022 [36]United StatesCase-control179 cases (SARS-CoV-2 test positive)
vs.
285 controls (SARS-CoV-2 test negative)		12–18 years2 Doses of BNT162b2June– September 2021
  • Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19-associated hospitalization
  • VE = 93% (95% CI, 83–97%); predominant variant: Delta
Klein, 2022 [38]United StatesCase-control9640 cases (SARS-CoV-2 test positive)
vs.
31,276 controls (SARS-CoV-2 test negative)		5–17 years2 Doses of BNT162b2April 2021–January 2022
  • Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalizations (ED/UC encounters)
  • Age 5–11 years; VE = 46%.
  • Age 12–17 years; VE ≥ 90% (protection within 149 days of second dose administration.)
Price, 2022 [37]United StatesCase-control1185 cases (SARS-CoV-2 test positive)
vs.
1627 controls (SARS-CoV-2 test negative)		5–18 years2 Doses of BNT162b2 m RNA vaccineJuly–February 2022
  • Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization, critical COVID-19 and non-critical COVID-19
  • Age 12–18 years; VE = 93% (95% CI, 89–95%) at 2–22 weeks following vaccination and VE = 92% (95% CI, 80–97%) at 23 44 weeks, predominant variant: Delta
  • Age 12–18 years; VE = 40% (95% CI, 9–60%) against COVID-19-associated hospitalization, 79% (95% CI, 51–91%) against critical COVID-19, and 20% (95% CI, −25–49%) against noncritical COVID-19 (median interval of 162 days following vaccination) predominant variant: Omicron
  • Age 5–11 years, VE = 68% (95% CI, 42–82%; median interval of 34 days since vaccination). predominant variant: Omicron
Halasa, 2022 [14]United StatesCase-control176 cases (SARS-CoV-2 test positive)
vs.
203 controls (SARS-CoV-2 test negative)		0–6 monthsMaternal 2-dose mRNA vaccinationJuly 2021–January 2022
  • Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization
  • Infants aged < 6 months; VE = 61% (95% CI, 31–78%).
  • VE = 32% (95% CI, −43–68%), (vaccination in first 20 weeks), and VE = 80% (95% CI, 55–91%), (vaccination later in pregnancy: 21 weeks through 14 days before delivery)
Zambrano, 2022 [11]United StatesCase-control102 cases (diagnosed with MIS-C)
vs.
181 controls (no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection)		12–18 years2 Doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in 12–18 year-oldsJuly 2021–January 2022
  • Vaccine effectiveness against MIS-C
  • VE = 91% (95% CI = 78–97%)
Fowlkes, 2022 [42]United StatesProspective cohort1364 participants5–15 years2 Doses of BNT162b2July 2021–February 2022
  • Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization
  • Age 5–11 years, VE = 31% (95% CI, 9–48%) (14–82 days after dose 2 administration) against Omicron infection
  • Age 12–15 years, VE = 87% (95% CI, 49–97%) (14–149 days after dose 2 administration), variant: Delta infection, and 59% (95% CI, 22–79%), variant: Omicron infection
Shi, 2022 [43]United StatesPopulation-based surveillance1475 (laboratory- confirmed COVID-19)5–11 years1–2 Doses of BNT162b2March 2020–February 2022
  • COVID-19-associated hospitalizations in unvaccinated children
  • Cumulative hospitalization rates among unvaccinated children were 2.1 times that of (19.1) vaccinated.
Ouldali, 2022 [13]FrancePopulation-based surveillanceNA12–17 years2 Doses of mRNA vaccine15 June 2021 and 1 January 2022
  • Vaccine effectiveness against MIS-C
  • MIS-C incidence = 2.9 per 1,000,000 in vaccinated children
  • MIS-C incidence = 113 per 1,000,000 in children infected with SARS-CoV-2
Marks, 2022 [39]United StatesPopulation-based Surveillance2818 (laboratory- confirmed COVID-19)12–17 years1–2 Doses of BNT162b2July 2021–January 2022
  • Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 associated hospitalization
  • Monthly hospitalization rates in unvaccinated adolescents aged 12–17 years (23.5) was 6 times as much as in fully vaccinated adolescents (3.8).
  • Increased rate of hospitalization in 0–4-year-olds among unvaccinated
Levy, 2021 [12]FrancePatient Registry107 (diagnosed with MIS-C)12–18 years1–2 Doses of mRNA vaccineSeptember 2021 and October 2021
  • Vaccine effectiveness against MIS-C
  • HR for MIS-C = 0.09 (95% CI, 0.04–0.21%; p  <  0.001)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mangat, C.; Yarrarapu, S.N.S.; Singh, G.; Bansal, P. Maternal COVID-19 Vaccine May Reduce the Risk of MIS-C in Infants: A Narrative Review. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091454

AMA Style

Mangat C, Yarrarapu SNS, Singh G, Bansal P. Maternal COVID-19 Vaccine May Reduce the Risk of MIS-C in Infants: A Narrative Review. Vaccines. 2022; 10(9):1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mangat, Chetna, Siva Naga Srinivas Yarrarapu, Gagandeep Singh, and Pankaj Bansal. 2022. "Maternal COVID-19 Vaccine May Reduce the Risk of MIS-C in Infants: A Narrative Review" Vaccines 10, no. 9: 1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop